Galaxy Tab 4 is not compatible with the CC form

Nobody knows why the Galaxy Tab 4 is not compatible with the CC form, and when it will be?  Thank you!

Hello!

Sorry for the late response: the apps for android should be downloaded on mobile devices only. Some users might get a few apps on the shelves, but it is not the rule.

There is no official date for the release, so I can't give you a straight answer. My speculation is probably something could happen in the fall, but honestly, I don't know. So far, mobile only.

Tags: Adobe Capture

Similar Questions

  • Samsung galaxy tab 2 is not compatible with flash player 11

    I just bought a samsung galaxy tab 2 with this model GT - P 5113, I tried to install flash player 11 and it says that it is not compatible with the model GT - P 5113,

    my friend has a samsung galaxy tab 2 with this model GT - P 5110, and he doesn't have a problem at all. can someone tell me what is the problem and how can I solve it?

    Thank you.

    Loading side older versions of Flash Player leaves your device at a significant risk of malware infection.  Versions of Flash Player for Android are 2011 and lack of hundreds of vulnerabilities disclosed publicly at this stage.  Install an older version of Flash Player on your Android device is a very bad idea.

    The only decent option at this point for security is to use a browser based on a cloud that streams Flash content on your device, like:

    Puffin Web browser - the fastest mobile browser with Flash support on cloud on iPad, iPhone and Android.

  • Galaxy S7 Edge is not compatible with the mixture (android)?

    I used to have a mix on my android cell.  I read on update 2.0 for Mix (android) and went to the game store.  Could not find it.  I returned to the article and there was a link, and he took me to the game store, but said "your motto is not compatible with this version."  What's the story?  Y at - it an update for android?

    Hi Mike,.

    I apologize as update 2.0 for Mix (android) is not yet compatible with the Galaxy S7 edge. The dedicated team working on getting one set for the device.

    The version currently supported for Galaxy S7 Egde is Version 1.2.512.

    Hope that helps!

    Kind regards

    Sheena

  • "This version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows you are using. Check your computer's system information to see if you need a x 86 (32 bit) or x 64 (64-bit) version of the program.

    Hello

    I seem to be having problems when you try to install a program on my Windows 7 that allows to launch on my Windows XP and Windows Vista. I used the tool to solve compatibility problems and selected these settings in the CONFIGURATION file, but nothing seems to work the error message I get is as follows:

    "This version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows you are using. Check your computer's system information to see if you need a x 86 (32 bit) or x 64 (64-bit) version of the program, and then contact the software publisher. »

    Is it possible to set my computer to allow this program to run successfully? Any solution would be greatly useful.

    Hello Rdforbe,

    The problem is a software that was created for Windows 95, 98, and Windows XP has no way to work correctly with an operating system that didn't even exist when the software was written. However, the error message you get normally means that you have a 32-bit software that you are trying to install on a 64-bit system.

    To find out if your computer is running 32-bit Windows or 64-bit, follow these steps:
    System opened by clicking on the button start , by clicking on the Control Panel, click System.
    Under system, you can view the system type. This will describe if you have 32-bit or 64-bit.

    You can also try compatibility mode.

    If the program is not compatible, then you try to install and run the program in compatibility mode.

    Use the following steps:

    (1) right click on the program

    2) click Properties

    3) click on the Compatibility tab

    (4) select run this program in compatibility mode and select Windows Vista or other operating system, the program has been run successfully.

    Check out the link here: make sure to run older programs in this version of Windows

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/make-older-programs-run-in-this-version-of-Windows

    If you are running Windows 7 Professional or Ultimate version, install Windows Virtual PC and Windows XP mode (http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtual-pc/default.aspx) and run your software in Windows XP.

    If you run Windows 7 Home Premium, try VirtualBox (www.virtualbox.org) or VMware Player (www.vmware.com), or any other software virtualization part 3rd and install a separate copy of Windows XP (family or professional edition) for this purpose. You can find the virtualization software free that will run on Windows 7 Home Premium.

    I hope this helps.

    Sincerely,

    Marilyn
    Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think

  • Error message: "the version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows that you are using", when you try to run an old ms - based back program in Win-7 Ultimate 64 bit.

    Original title: program compatibility Application Applications App Apps game games Legacy Crash crashes Hang hangs

    I get this message when you try to run an old MS-DOS - based program in Win-7 Ultimate 64-bit.

    "The version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows you are using. Check your computer system information to see whether you need a x 86 (32 bit) or x 64 (64-bit) version of the program and then contact the software publisher. »

    I understand that I am under a 64 bit OS, but is it possible to get this program to run? I was wondering if anyone has tips :)

    Hi Bcopeland,

    Thanks for posting your question in the Microsoft Community.

    Based on the information, you are trying to install and use an old ms - dos program based in Windows-7 Ultimate 64-bit.

    The problem is a software that was created for Windows 95, 98, and Windows XP has no way to work correctly with an operating system that didn't even exist when the software was written. However, the error message you get normally means that you have a 32-bit software that you are trying to install on a 64-bit system.

    You can check the compatibility of the program with Windows 7, in the Compatibility Center.

    Compatibility Center

    If the program is not compatible, then you try to install and run the program in compatibility mode.

    a. click right on the program.

    b. click Properties.

    c. click on the tab compatibility.

    d. Select run this program in compatibility mode and select Windows Vista or whatever to use the system, the program was executed successfully.

    Here is an article that gives you more information on this:

    Make older programs in this version of Windows

    If the problem persists, you can get in touch with the software vendor to see for the latest version of the program to use the same system of 64-bit Windows 7.

    Hope the helps of information.

    If you need assistance in the future to resolve any issues related to Windows, post your query and we will be happy to help you.

  • Old favorites are not compatible with the version 20 + Firefox

    General information:
    I use the old client version 3.6 given that an old utility addon author stopped update and will not work with the new revisions. Despite disabling the update featured on: config and in preferences, the browser refreshes still finished (initially I was using 3.4 and would prefer to use that, but no matter how I try I can is no longer cancel 3.6 to 3.4 even if I reinstall using an Installer 3.4). Accordingly, I had the habit of keeping a copy of my directory of firefox where it updates again without asking, she has. This could help the guy out to meet countless people who have lost their favorites because of the upgrade released this year and I hope that someone to investigate and release a patch/utility to fix the problem.

    Question:
    I checked that the most recent customer since at least version 20 and leave, are not compatible with the old bookmark JSON files. Those who have been upgraded to the latest revision not only lose their favorites, but cannot restore them either, as Firefox only returns the error message: "unable to process the Backup File.

    I confirmed that the files themselves are perfectly intact with no sign of corruption and are as expected. Restore ok old revisions of browser (in my case specifically 3.6), they will not restore the most recent customer reviews. This isn't a fault with bookmark backups, but with new clients (I guess they changed the way they store information in the JSONs at some point. I note in the code for the JSONs GUID has never been used in old revisions, but it is in the most recent revision. Maybe it's causing an incompatibility problem? You just need to adjust the client so that it looks for the GUID and if none can be found to ignore it rather than decide that the file is corrupted.

    Old JSON Code snippet: {"title":"","id":1,"dateAdded":1306666129870000,"lastModified":1306670152435000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"placesRoot","children":[{"title":"Bookmarks Menu","id":2,"parent":1,"dateAdded":1306666129870000,"lastModified":1381254048121000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"bookmarksMenuFolder","children":[{"title":"Recently Bookmarked","id":6,"parent":2,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4,"mimeType":null,"type":3,"value":"RecentlyBookmarked"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:folder=BOOKMARKS_MENU&folder=UNFILED_BOOKMARKS&folder=TOOLBAR&sort=12&excludeQueries=1&excludeItemIfParentHasAnnotation=livemark%2FfeedURI& maxResults = 10 & queryType = 1 "}, {'index': 1,"title":"Recent Tags", 'id': 7, 'parent': 2,"annos": [{'name':" places/SmartBookmark', 'flags': 0, 'expires': 4, 'mimeType': null, 'type': 3, 'value': 'RecentTags'}], 'type': ' text/x-moz-place', 'uri' ":" place: sort = 14 & type = 6 & maxResults = 10 & queryType = 1 ""}, {'index': 2, 'title': id '',' ': 8, 'parent': 2, 'dateAdded': 1294868015246000, 'lastModified': 1294868015246000, 'type': "text/x-moz-place-separator"}

    New JSON Code Snippet: {"title":"","guid":"5rkFafJ6AnRZ","id":1,"index":0,"dateAdded":1396387525168000,"lastModified":1396387525168000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"placesRoot","children":[{"title":"Bookmarks Menu","guid":"m7vLM41-lzQi","id":2,"index":0,"parent":1,"dateAdded":1396387525168000,"lastModified":1396387526173000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"bookmarksMenuFolder","children":[{"title":"Recently Bookmarked","guid":"BEffyw6xva93","id":13,"index":0,"parent":2,"dateAdded":1396387526172000,"lastModified":1396387526172000,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4 ,"value":"RecentlyBookmarked"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:folder=BOOKMARKS_MENU&folder=UNFILED_BOOKMARKS&folder=TOOLBAR&queryType=1&sort=12&maxResults=10&excludeQueries=1"},{"title":"Recent Tags","guid":"WmnlbVv38Bjv","id":14,"index":1,"parent":2,"dateAdded":1396387526172000,"lastModified":1396387526172000,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4,"value":"RecentTags"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:type=6&sort=14&maxResults=10"}

    Solution?
    In my case, I had a copy backup of the old directory for review. To restore I opened the copy and export bookmarks as an HTML, that I restored in the most recent client. If you don't have a copy of the former client, the best thing would be to try and re-install an older revision of the customer and either make a copy of the program folder and use another copy of that you can use the new and old customers and you worry about the loss of an older revision, since you'll always have 2 copies of the former client (the one you use the one that you use to restore in the case of at level). Or export bookmarks to an HTML element, and then upgrade the client to the newest and import the HTML instead of JSON files.

    Please review and create a more simple solution to a problem of stupid incompatibility. ^_^

    There are a number of operations in the file places.sqlite which are obsolete.
    For example,.

    setItemGUID (aItemId, aGUID) obsolete since Gecko 14.0 - returns a unique global identifier for the element. This is mainly for use by extensions that synchronize data between different profiles bookmark.



    Former id snippit:
    "title": "','id': 1,"dateAdded": 1306666129870000,"
    New snippit
    {"title": "","guid": "5rkFafJ6AnRZ",""id ": 1, 'index': 0, 'dateAdded': 1396387525168000"}

    There are other identifier here has changed, I think in version 14
    «Note: the importHTMLFromFileToFolder() method has been removed in Gecko 14.0 (14.0 Firefox / Thunderbird 14.0 / SeaMonkey 2.11).»

    But more likely the former is Netscape format: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libra.../aa753582%28VS.85%29.aspx

    I tried this however: I installed the old version (3.5) and updated to the current version. All my favorites were there. I had to check the updates and could not skip certain steps of 3.5 to 3.6 for example. He then went from 3.6 to 12, then with todays update went straight to 30. They're all here. However nothing is perfect, backup is recommended as well.

    Back to your question, makes it easier for backward compatibility, my hypothesis is that they changed with the updates and ignored some versions. Saved profiles or places.sqlite files may be missing this change because the format changes in the update?

    My suggestion would be filing a bug at this request, providing a few cases where this would be necessary. Currently only the current version of Firefox is supported, which can leave us to the work around that you are currently using.

    Reference documentation for the developer of the places :

  • My Itunes does not save my iPhone saying that the backup is damaged or is not compatible with the iPhone.

    I / m trying to backup my iPhone 5, but the iTunes says it is not possible because the backup is damaged or is not compatible with the iPhone... What should I do?

    What version of iTunes you have? The most recent is 12.4.1. Try downloading this version and controlled again.

  • Not compatible with the version26.* Add-on

    LightBeam add-on not compatible with the latest version of android firefox. What should do?

    Hello BudIsland, add-on (currently?) is available for firefox on desktop, not the android version: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/lightbeam/

  • Firefox worked, today has not started with the error the version of this file is not compatible with the version of windows you are using.

    Computer is Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit. Firefox has work fine for over a year on this computer. Nothing has been changed or updated updated except Windows update indicates that it installed updates on August 19. I had computer week before because only out of town, back entrance and began August 18, but Firefox has worked that day. Does not use FF again until today. Today August 22, firefox does not start, shortcut icon changed program not there. Exe in the folder when you click Poster error message says the version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows, I am running. Exe of Firefox shows created on 20 August. I suspect the update, Windows or FF but lean towards windows, which was spent, who broke things. I noticed that IE 10 updates, updates of .NET framework and the malicious software removal tool have been installed. I tried to restart the computer, has not set. Tried to run as administrator, did not work. I don't want to uninstall FF, at least have to because of all the things I have here, bookmarks, last past passwords, etc..

    Hello

    Some Firefox problems can be solved by performing a clean reinstall. This means that you remove Firefox program files (not the profile folder, where the bookmarks are stored) and then reinstall Firefox. Please follow these steps:

    Note: You can print these steps or consult them in another browser.

    1. Download the latest version of Firefox from http://www.mozilla.org office and save the installer to your computer.
    2. Once the download is complete, close all Firefox Windows (click on quit in the file menu or Firefox).
    3. Remove the Firefox installation folder, which is located in one of these locations, by default:
      • Windows:

        • C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
        • C:\Program Files (x 86) \Mozilla Firefox
      • Mac: Delete Firefox in the Applications folder.
      • Linux: If you have installed Firefox with the distribution-based package manager, you must use the same way to uninstall: see Install Firefox on Linux. If you have downloaded and installed the binary package from the Firefox download page, simply remove the folder firefox in your home directory.
    4. Now, go ahead and reinstall Firefox:
      1. Double-click on the downloaded Setup file and go through the steps in the installation wizard.
      2. Once the wizard is completed, click to open Firefox directly after clicking the Finish button.

    Please report back to see if this helped you!

    Thank you.

  • 16.0.2 Firefox is not compatible with the zone alarm Forcefield AGAIN. Please, help users with that. No current positions

    Before I updated to the current version, I checked for "reserves" and found nothing to indicate that the Zone Alarm Extreme Security, ForceField was not compatible with the Version 16.0.2. If I had known that I would not have updated. Y at - it no use for those of us who have this problem. ? The only post I noticed on this problem is 'closed' and dated about 8 months ago.

    Thanks for the reply, the old Fox!

    I agree with you 100%. This occurred without fault to each new update of Firefox.

    I wish that Firefox had warned users of the incompatibility issues with ZA ForceField, as they have done with other problems before users downloading the latest version of Firefox.

    Thank you also for the link to the "release notes", which I didn't have before. It is a help in the future.

    Warm greetings,

        Boudica
    
  • Why use my original USB cable charger for more than a year now is startig to show a sign that it is not compatible with the device? o

    I used without problem my USB cable for over a year, it is original Apple and yesterday began to show a sign that it is not compatible with the device. How can not be supported if it's Apple.

    This can occur if the cable is damaged in any way. See: recharge your iPhone, iPad and iPod touch - Apple Support for more information.

  • I uninstalled Firefox 7 because it was not compatible with the Yahoo toolbar. They will never fix this? I need my Yahoo.

    I've upgraded to Firefox 7, but it is not compatible with the Yahoo toolbar. I uninstalled my previous Firefox back. They will never fix the Yahoo toolbar addon?

    Why not ask Yahoo? It's their toolbar.

  • I have Webroot Security and Firefox is not compatible with the malicious URL part of the program? How can I protect myself?

    When I downloaded Firefox and checked my extensions, I've been informed that Firefox is not compatible with the prevention of malware from my Webroot security package. I use it successfully with Windows and just renewed for another year. What do you do to protect myself? I'm not a computer expert, so if you can answer in plain language that would be appreciated. In addition, we stream video much and I noticed that DivX is also not compatible. What should I do about it? Thank you.

    Firefox has had its own fake Web / since 2008 malware protection.

    http://www.Mozilla.com/en-us/Firefox/phishing-protection/

    Firefox Add-ons developers are responsible for these add-ons up to date as new versions of Firefox are available. Check with Webroot & DivX on updates for their Firefox extensions.

    That said, the modules that are hosted on the official website of the AddonsMozilla.Org are tested and 'hit' by compatibility automatically, if these modules are considered to be compatible with a new version of Firefox that is about to be released. For modules that are not "compatible", the developer of the add-on Gets an email telling them basically what needs to be fixed. AMO extensions hosted are automatically updated as required by Firefox. The 'check' available updates each time is that Firefox is open.

    For modules that are not hosted on AMO, there is a 'updateURL' function that allows to have Firefox check for an update across the internet, the a particular extension developer said. Unfortunately, too many developers take advantage of this feature and needlessly let their users to search an update themselves. who then need to manually install the hotfix or update version.

    It's like a bunch of clowns of circus without master ring to 'bring in the clowns' at the right time in the show.

  • Why wireless keyboards are not compatible with the Apple TV (4th generation)?

    Why wireless keyboards are not compatible with the Apple TV (4th generation)?  Similarly, why didn't the App compatible with Apple TV Remote (4th generation)?  They will be in the future?

    No one here knows why Apple have so far decided not to support Bluetooth keyboards, or if they are likely to do so in the future. The iOS app is compatible with the 4 ATV in its latest version (4.2.3) - https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/remote/id284417350?mt=8

  • Mivue Navman is not compatible with the el captain

    I got a new GPS unit with built in front in front of the camera for Christmas - the NavMan MIVUEDRIVE LM

    In the box, it says it's compatible with osx 10.6 and higher - NavDesk (it is for the software needed to access the features and download maps, etc.),

    in order to have a new macbook pro with El Captain 10.11.2 installed, I thought it's above 10.6 - but no!  When I called I was told it is not compatible with the El captain and they are working on software that will be available before the end of February or March but would not guarantee, this would be the case and could take more time.

    In addition to being furious that the development of a mac to work with their products interface was obviously not high on their radar, but surely they would have been given access to coding etc needed well before El captain had even published us - passionate Mac users.

    This is the case, or is an international company, the size of the NavMan have play still catch up six months after the release of a new osx?

    BTW, thanks for letting me than get off my chest ;-)

    Mike

    Apple makes updates available to developers months before publication so that the developers can work to make their products compatible with the new OS. Some developers are more Rapids and/or care more than others - it is totally up to them.

Maybe you are looking for