Guest access with ISE and WLC LWA

Hi guys,.

Our company try to implement access as guest with dan ISE WLC with the local Web authentication method. But there is problem that comes with the certificate. This is the scenario:

1. the clients are trying to connect wifi with guest SSID

2. once it connects, you can open the browser and try to open a Web page (example: cisco.com)

3, because guests didn't connect, so this link redirect to "ISE Guest Login Page" (become): url

https://ISE-hostname:8443/guestportal/login.action?switch_url= https://1.1.1.1/login.html&wlan=Guest&redirect=www.cisco.com/

)

4. If there is no Login to ISE not installed comments Page, no reliable connection of message message, but it will be fine is they "Add Exception and install the certificate".

5. once the Guest Login Page will appear and you can enter their username and password.

6 connection success and they will be redirected to www.cisco.com and there pop-up 1.1.1.1 (IP of the Virtual Interface WLC) with the logout button.

The problem occur in scenario 6, after the success of the opening session, the Web page with the address and the error of certificate ISE IP to 1.1.1.1 is appear.

I know that it happened when you can has no Page of Login of WLC certificate...

My Question is, is there a way of tunneling WLC certificate to EHT? Or what we can do for ISE validate certificate WLC, invited didn't need to install the certificate WLC / root certificate before you connect to the Wifi?

THX 4 your answer and sorry for my bad English...

Do not mix WLC with ISE comments Portal local Web authentication. Choose one or the other. I suggest the portal + WLC CWA.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Cisco ISE and WLC Access-List Design/scalability

    Hello

    I have a scenario that wireless clients are authenticated by the ISE and different ACL is applied depending on the rules in the ISE. The problem I have seen is due to the limitation on the Cisco WLC that limit only 64 input access list. As the installer has only a few IVR/interfaces and several different access lists are applied to the same base on user groups interface; I was wondering if there may be an evolutionary design / approach according to which the access list entries can evolve next to create a vlan for each group of users and apply the access list on the interface of layer 3 instead? I illustrated the configuration below for reference:

    Group of users 1 - apply ACL 1 - on Vlan 1

    User 2 group - apply ACL 2 - on the Vlan 1

    3 user group - apply ACL 3 - on the Vlan 1

    The problem appears only for wireless users, he does not see on wired users as the ACLs can be applied successfully without restriction as to the switches.

    Any suggestion is appreciated.

    Thank you.

    In fact, you have limitations on the side of the switch as well. Long ACL can deplete resources AAGR of the switch. Take a look at this link:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/Catalyst-3750-series-switches/68461-high-CPU-utilization-cat3750.html

    The new WLCs based on IOS XE and not the old OS Wireless/Aironet will provide the best experience in these matters.

    Overall, I see three ways to overcome your current number:

    1. reduce the ACL by making them less specific

    2 use L3 interfaces on a switch L3 or FW and the ACL is applied to them

    3. use the SGT/SGA

    I hope this helps!

    Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

  • ISE and WLC for sanitation of the posture

    Please can someone clarify a few things regarding the ISE and posture wireless.

    (1) is the ACL-POSTURE-REDIRECT used for conversion, or is it just an ACL to redirect some of the posture of the kickoff checking traffic?

    (2) can / a dACL/wACL list must be specified as a sanitation ACL?

    (3) the WLC ACL should be written in long format (manually specify source and dest ports/doesny direction any job?)

    (4) does anyone have working example ACL for redirect (CPC) posture and sanitation (dACL)?

    (5) any other advice or pointers would be as useful as any docs I have found so far, what he TrustSec2, CiscoLive or anything else, do not seem to help me understand sanitation and WLC posture

    Thank you

    Nick

    Yes,

    This means that strategy available to your customer does not have a rule that will correspond to an entrepreneur who joined the network. Can you post a screenshot of the provisioning of customer policy?

    Thank you

    Tarik Admani
    * Please note the useful messages *.

  • Guest access with CWA on ISE 1.3

    Hi, we have implemented CWA for wireless using ISE. However there is a problem, the redirect URL is a name, not an IP address and public use DNS servers dhcp, so CWA scope comments does not work unless we put society DNS servers.

    Is it possible to configure ISE to send the ip address instead of the name of redirection in CWA?

    Concerning

    Yes, you can set a static NHP to use for redirection in the authz profile:

    But you'll find yourself with a cert for the user experience error unless you have IP addresses in the areas of SAN of the ISE certificate.  I guess you're unwanted by using internal DNS for the guest can resolve host PSN names correctly?

    Tim

  • Guest access with CWA on ISE

    Hi community support

    We implemented just CWA for wireless using ISE. However there is a problem, the redirect URL is a name, not an IP address and public use DNS servers dhcp, so CWA scope comments does not work unless we put society DNS servers.

    so... is my question possible to configure ISE to send the ip address instead of the name of redirection in CWA?

    Thanks in advance...

    Hello Julio,.

    So far, there is no way to use the name instead of IP. ISE has always required the IP of URL redirection. To understand how to work the CWA you can see the attached PDF file.

  • some computers are not authenticated successfully with ISE and join comments vlan

    Hello

    We have deployed ISE in a company and set the workstations for authentication of the computer. When jobs are authentication, they are placed in the VLAN Data (5), if they fail, then they must be placed in the VLAN (50). WiredAutoConfig service as supplicant is set with gpo to all the workstations have the same settings.

    Certificate of the ISE is signed by our internal CA and workstations have also imported CA in their trusted CA list.

    The problem is that few jobs are placed in the VLAN. Previously on these workstations, we got a pop-up as below. When you click on 'connect' work stations have been placed properly in the data VLAN (5). We do not get this security alert more on these machines and they just join them VLAN that is don't want we want.

    However, most of the workstations is authenticated successfully.

    switchports configuration:

    switchport access vlan 5
    switchport mode access
    switchport voice vlan 6
    authentication event fail following action method
    action of death event authentication server allow vlan 5
    action of death event authentication server allow voice
    no response from the authentication event action allow vlan 50
    living action of the server reset the authentication event
    multi-domain of host-mode authentication
    authentication order dot1x mab
    authentication priority dot1x mab
    Auto control of the port of authentication
    periodic authentication
    authentication violation replace
    MAB
    MLS qos trust dscp
    dot1x EAP authenticator
    dot1x tx-time 10
    spanning tree portfast
    spanning tree enable bpduguard

    Journal of ISE authentication;

    Everyone is in a similar situation?

    I guess that the machines in the domain have the root CA certificate checked under the 'Protected EAP Properties' window?

  • Compatibility of switches access with ISE

    Hi all

    I need some advice on models of switches buy to support almost all of the features that the ISE offeres... Mainly...

    MAB, 802. 1 x, Web Auth, CoA, dACL, SGA...

    Now, I've been reviewing the Cisco 2960 switches and sheets advise that they support some features, but then when I look at the compatibility of the access network Cisco ISE device list that was updated in December 2013... When you look under Cisco 2960, he advises that they support only 802.1 x, & MAB?

    I'm planning for the future deployment of ISE features to access switches in our network, but need to ensure that A) existing switches support these features and B) new switches that we buy will support these features.

    Is there a more accurate document available, or someone has had experience with the current Cisco 2960 switches and how they work well with the ISE?

    Thank you

    Mario

    Take a look at this link instead:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ISE/1-2/compatibility/ise_sdt.html

    DACL, WebAuth (both local and Central) is certainly supported. SGA/SGT isn't right...

    Thanks for the note!

  • ASA VPN with ISE and different backends WBS for authentication

    Hello

    I have an AAA-problem I hope to have a few problems help.

    The problem ultimately is: how the ASA via ISE send Radius Access requests to different given OTP backends provided a connection to a certain group of Tunnel.

    BACKGROUND:

    I'll try to give you a brief picture of the scenario, this is what I currently have.

    A VPN system (ASA 8.4 (4)) where I let my users to choose among 3 different methods of authentication being

    (1) certificate (on chip card)

    (2) token - token of the OTP (One Time Password provided via the smartphone application: using pledge of Nordic OTP-Edge transport server)

    (3) SMS - OTP token (Nordic OTP - Edge transport server SMS OTP)

    The choice corresponds to different groups of profiles/Tunnel connection.

    Today, all authentication requests go directly to the OTP server and authorization goes directly to the AD via LDAP.

    THE PROBLEM:

    The problem occurs when I try to put in the ISE in the mixture.

    What I obviously (?) would like to do is have all the network authentication/authorization to go through my ISE platform to take advantage of a centralized administration, monitoring etc.

    Again I would need to use data bases different backend such as AD and Nordic OTP - Edge server, but then mandated by ISE.

    For me to be able to know what back-end AAA to the proxy system, to somehow be able to distinguish the incoming Radius Access-requests.

    WHAT WE CALL:

    At the time of the ASA 8.4.3 Radius access request contains 2 new attributes, the name of Group of Tunnel and the Type of customer, when a VPN user connects.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/ref_extserver.html#wp1802187

    QUESTION:

    The seams, that I can achieve what I want by looking at the access request attribute Radius "Tunnel Group Name" and forward my request to different backends OTP for the authentication part therefore in theory. But, how do I actually go ahead and set that up in ISE?

    I don't see this attribute when I look at the details of Radius Authentication for an authentication AAA of the ASA at the ISE.

    Best regards

    / Mattias

    I think you can hit the following problem:

    CSCtz49846: ISE does not match the condition with VPN 146 Tunnel-Group-Name attribute

    This issue is not specific to this attribute, as shown in the solution shown in the accompanying note

    Workaround

    Ensure that the attribute name does not include a '.' character. This also applies to some of the existing attributes in the dictionary of Cisco-VPN300. Attribute names should be changed so that they do not include a "." character.

  • WRT160N + RTP300 + questions with others for access with PSP and teamspeak

    Seen with the RTP300 Vonage phone service, I was able to port forward to allow TeamSpeak work properly. In other words, others may join my server. I installed the WRT160N, with a secure network, to work the long side of the RTP300 last night and now nobody is able to join the server. Get the error is that the server is offline, when it is not. I went through and made the redirection of port, as directed by portforwad.com, nothing helped.

    As I have had this set up prior to the installation of the new router, long set my firewall to allow this program to run/gain access.

    In addition to that, my stepson is now having problems when it tries to connect to the internet with his PSP and I don't know exactly how to go about this peripheral access via the wireless router.

    The IP address of your new router is 192.168.1.1.

    Assuming that your RTP300 router running the IP 192.168.15.1 default, connect the router to the ethernet port RTP300 1 for the WRT160N router to the ethernet port 1 (not the Internet Port)... To connect to a computer to Port 2 of the WRT160N router...

    Press and hold the reset button on your router (WRT160N) for 30 seconds... Release the reset button... Unplug the power cable from your router, wait 30 seconds and reconnect the power cable... Now re - configure your router...

    Access to the web interface of the router WRT160N, open an Internet Explorer browser on your computer (desktop) wired page. In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1 and press ENTER... Let the empty user name & password use admin lowercase...

    On the configuration in Network Configuration tab, change the IP Address of the router to 192.168.15.10, disable the DHCP server and click on save settings... Wait a while and unplug the power cable from your router, wait 30 seconds and reconnect the power cable...

    Your wireless router needs to be configured, and the computers connected to the wireless router should be able to access the Internet...

  • VPN to ASA with ISE and Posture

    Hello

    I'll put up a new facility of ISE. I want to install AnyConnect 4.1 and use ISE for authentication & posture validation. I'm ok with the side of the authentication of things.

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/Adaptive-Security-app...

    This configuration applies to time AnyConnect 3.1 & 4.x?

    Any help would be appreciated.

    Thank you

    Hi Stuart,

    Yes - this configuration applies as well to the AC3 and AC4.

    The new feature of AC4 is available directly from ISE ability:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/AnyConnect-secure-mob...

    But the posture itself works in a similar way.

    Thank you

    Michal

  • ISE and WLC for CWA (Web Central Auth)

    Hi all

    As we know that WLC (i.e. 5508) is intolerant of MAB (MAC Auth Bypass) and it supports CWA in 7.2.x.

    CWA is the result of successful MAB. So, how CWA to work for the wireless? So that means WLC support MAB?

    Hello

    The term in the wireless world is mac filtering. When mac filtering is fired, you will return the CWA portal in the access-accept.

    Don't forget to set your condition in the authentication policy to continue if the user is not found, while the device can hit the CWA default rule.

    Thank you

    Tarik Admani
    * Please note the useful messages *.

  • VMware Guest works with IPv4 and not IPv6 - ideas everything?

    Well, have a little patience with me. I have a very complicated setup which works perfectly with IPv4, but does not work with IPv6. I hope that one of you superstars can help me to understand how to enable IPv6. Here are the basic configuration:


    Mac mini:

    • Mac mini (end 2012) Mavericks 10.9.5 and VMware Fusion 7.1.0 Server
      • A KDLINKS up one1 account USB 3.0 to Gigabit Ethernet adapter is installed. It is functionally identical to all other brands of USB3/Gigabit Ethernet, which is based on the 6 AX88179 chipset adapter; which is the latest version.
      • (I have another identical USB 3.0 to Gigabit Ethernet adapter, still in the box, do not set, in case this might help the solution.)
      • The most recent 6 Mac driver is installed in the Mac mini, downloaded from ASIX. (The driver on the driver of the KDLINKS Web site is a little older).

    Internet connection:

    • Our Internet connection is a regular cable modem. The cable modem is a simple bridge, Ethernet cable. He gets a public (Internet) IP address on the ISP using DHCP Ethernet interface, as you can imagine.

    VMware Fusion Guest - a firewall device:

    • The VMware Fusion guest is a firewall device. Here's its network configuration:
      • The internal interface is bridged to the Mac mini integrated Ethernet adapter. It has a private IP (10-net). It serves as a one-stop shop for all of your home LAN.
      • The external interface is bridged to the USB/Ethernet adapter. The device of host firewalls Gets the address public Internet IP from the ISP via DHCP.

    Mini Mac Network Configuration:

    • Network Configuration Mac mini (OS X System Preferences network 10.9.5,):
      • The Mac mini integrated Ethernet is configured with a fixed IP on the LAN private address and is configured to use the private IP address of the firewall device of comments as the gateway and DNS server.
      • Adapter USB/Ethernet of the Mac mini is defined as:
        • Configure IPv4: Off
        • Advanced... Configure IPv6: Link-local only
        • The goal is to ensure that the Mac mini can be reached or attacked from the Internet. All Internet traffic should be a device of host firewalls.

    Totally works with IPv4.

    Surprisingly, this all works with IPv4 without any problem whatsoever.


    IPv6 taken in charge by the provider of Internet services and tested with Time Capsule:

    There is no problems with IPv6 when I use an Apple Time Capsule as the firewall / router between the home network and the Internet, using the same cable modem. It is easy to configure, and IPv6 works inside the LAN House and all as well go to the servers on the Internet that support IPv6. Tested, working, as expected.

    I'd do it want to use this device to host VMware Fusion as our firewall router firewalls House for IPv4 and IPv6, the time Capsule not.

    THE PROBLEM:

    The device of host firewalls cannot acquire an IPv6 address of the ISP. He obtains an IPv4 address, but not an IPv6 address.

    THE QUESTION:

    What can I do to make the apparatus of host firewalls acquires an address IPv6, the same way as did the Time Capsule?

    • The Mac mini (host) does not expose its interfaces directly to the Internet.
    • The Mac mini (host) would carry its IPv6 Internet traffic via the comments, the same as its IPv4 Internet traffic firewall application.

    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

    I solved my problem. It was a setting of configuration of the firewall of comments and had nothing to do with VMware Fusion. Here are the details, in case others have the same problem:

    Comments firewall device has been configured as a gateway IPv4, but not as an IPv6 gateway. As a result, the firewall received a single IPv6 address of the ISP. It was a 128, of course.

    Once I enabled the 'IPv6 Default Gateway' setting for the interface external unit of firewall of comments (which translates as the USB3/Ethernet interface to the cable modem) and rebooted the modem cable and firewall, the firewall has asked an IPv6 network block instead (a 64 network). After that, everything worked as expected.

    I know that nobody has answered this detailed query, but I know that a lot of people read it. Thanks for taking a peek. I hope this solution helps others.

  • Lock Keychain Access with session and lock screen

    Hi guys,.

    I work on a macbook (which belongs to my boss) and he asked me to give him the password for the session.

    So far, it is quite logical since it is a work computer and not mine itself. But like all mac users, I use iCloud for share my keychain and passwords, so I'm pretty reluctant to give him my password for the session.

    There must be a way to lock the Keyring when the screen is locked so that the next time I log in, and I want to use build-in password management in Safari (for example), the system wonder a password. Is there a way to achieve this?

    Thank you.

    Hello!

    Please open Keychain Access via spotlight, take your cursor on the menu bar and select Preferences in the access of the main chain, click on Legeneralonglet.

    To select Preferences Keychain Access, you can also use command-comma

    Select view status of keychain from the menu bar, a padlock icon appears in the menu at the top of the screen bar.

    To lock the screen manually click the padlock icon and choose lock screen.

    Note: when its done do not click locking ring in the menu bar at the top like pop-up will appear and prompts for the password.

    Thank you!

  • How to restrict access with usernames and passwords?

    I'm an intern in a manufacturing company who hired me to do a series of tutorials using Captivate.  The goal is to have a handful of employees (scattered throughout the world) to be able to go to the company Web site and take the tutorials & quizzes that I do.  I played with the advanced options vary a bit to get a feel for them, but I'm not finding what I need.  The employee that the company chooses to take these courses online should be able to sign in with a username and a password for a page that contains the courses listed there.

    Should I get our server/Web site managers to code all this, or is it easier (and it would make more sense) to make a presentation of Captivate referring to a list of the specific company e-mail address and allows them only these email address to have a user name and password created for her.  From this point, once the user connects, they see hyperlinks to the online course, they need to take.

    Any input on this would be very useful and thanks in advance!

    Close enough...

    And LMS is not the ONLY way to follow the scores and information, it is just the most common these days.

    Captivate allows alternatives, as for an acrobat.com account as you point out, or you can create a custom report page:

    http://help.Adobe.com/en_US/Captivate/CP/using/WS5b3ccc516d4fbf351e63e3d119e958285f-8000.h tml #WS365a66ad37c9f510-67fa130d1265cad66a2-7fff

    However, these methods do not provide for any security from the start.

    If your TI people are ready to set up a folder protected by password on your Web server and you configure your lessons to Captivate him make the acrobat.com account or a custom report page, perhaps you could accomplish what you need fairly easily (low cost). However, this approach can specifically permits not to track people. If you have a site with one generic login (i.e. the user: password), you can just about anyone with this user/pass. If you want each user to have their own username and password, which becomes much more complex. Can your IT configuration guy such a login page that syncs with a centralized database users (e.g. Active Directory)?

    So how do follow you that user through Captivate so the results of the lesson are recorded for the related user on your personalized page?

    It starts to get complicated, so an LMS may be easier:

    Moodle is a very popular, free LMS.

    http://Moodle.org

    Installation can be something internally (find a server, find people to install), but there are people out there who offer to host it for you.

    Here are some more:

    http://www.openelms.org/

    http://sakaiproject.org/

    There are also a variety of LMS commercial products out there, costs vary widely.

    This is what we use: http://www.inquisiqR3.com (link prices are on this page)

    Otherwise, here is a list of good references where you can choose a variety of filtering criteria.

    http://www.Capterra.com/learning-management-system-software

    Hope that helps!
    Erik

  • Guest access with a 1240AG

    I have a 1240AG connected to a 3560 connected to ASA5505 greater security.

    I can't the VLAN to work properly. One SSID will work at the time, and only when it is connected to the vlan native.

    I have attached my configs

    Hi, you have a mismach in configuring VLAN native. I guess, that the VLAN 1 is for the management and VLAN 20/30 are intended for users.

    So firstly - do the FastEthernet0.1 interface originate and Fa0.20 to be disadvantaged by 20 and bridge-group 20. BVI 1 will be automatically connected to Fa0.1 and the VLAN 1 on the switch.

    Secondly - even on X.20 Dot11Radio interface. Dot11RadioX.1 can be removed.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Ios10 of 3rd generation Apple TV

    I just updated my iPad to ios10 and now I can not mirror to my 3rd gen Apple TV (7.2.1). How can I fix it?

  • Pavilion zd8398ea: laptop will not be upgraded to win7 Win10

    My mavhine has been upgraded to Windows 7 service pack 1.  He is current with the updates of Windows 7.  I Win 10 App display, but he informs me that in can not be upgraded tp win 10 because there is a compatibility issue with the ATI RAdeon x 600: '

  • Unrecognizable USB

    As I did the updates of Windows, I can't fix anything via the USB port. When I attach my cell phone, I get a message that says: it is unrecognizable. When I attach my camera, I get nothing. It brings nothing to the top in the my computer window. Befo

  • Probe FBUS node

    Is it possible to continuously send sensor nodes to the field device and monitor the response of the probe to check if a package is missed? I want to program the NOR-FBUS configurator to send PNs programmatically.

  • T40 fan error

    I have a T40 Type 2373 and when I turn it on, it reads Fan Error and turns off after a few seconds. I guess I have to buy a new fan, but I don't know which fan to buy. A replacement parts site says that he wears a LONG FAN and FAN SHORT for the T40.