HELP how much extra space ESXI 5.0 snapshot consolidation require?

Similar Questions

• How much disk space Windows 7 will have?

  Original title: help with Windows 7 Ultimate edition.

  I had Windows XP laptop and 2 GB of Ram and 74.5 GB of disk space and I want to get Windows 7 Ultimate how much disk space will it take?

  Hello

  I would only advise upgrade Windows 7 to check things other than running disk space...

  http://www.Microsoft.com/en-GB/download/details.aspx?ID=20

  System requirements for Windows 7...

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/is-is/Windows7/products/system-requirements

  See also advice about how to update itself...

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/is-is/Windows7/help/upgrading-from-Windows-XP-to-Windows-7

  Tricky

• How much free space do I have on creative cloud?

  How much free space do I?

  Try to Browse, sync and manage the assets of the Adobe Creative Cloud

• How much free space will be left after you import?

  Hallo. I need to replace all the patterns on the integration server using those on the production server. I want to know how much free space is left on/off data to the integration server after this kind of refreshment. The two databases are Oracle 9 so I'll use exp/IMP. Here's how I do it. Could check you if I think that good? It is 72 GB of free space on/data on the target server.
  
  Size used Avail capacity mounted file system
  / dev/vgsmxdata/lvsmxcopy G 194,74 122,56 72,18 G G 63% / data
  
  Overall size of the exported schemas of the SOURCE_DB is 150 GB. The same patterns on TARGET_DB takes 90 GB. If the difference is 60GB. Free space in the data files in TARGET_DB is 30 GB. This means that in the first place, the free space in the data files is filled and after that datafiles extend? This would mean that a database would extend up to 150 GB and data/free space would be 40 GB after updating. Am I wrong?
  
  SELECT ' TOTAL :'|| SUM (ALLOCATED_MB),
  ' USE :'|| SUM (USED_MB) USED,
  "FREE :'||". SUM (FREE_SPACE_MB)
  FROM (SELECT SUBSTR (df.NAME, 1, 40) file_name, df.bytes / 1024 / 1024 allocated_mb,)
  ((df.bytes/1024/1024)-NVL (SUM (dfs.bytes) / 1024 / 1024, 0)) used_mb,)
  NVL (SUM (dfs.bytes) / 1024 / 1024, 0) free_space_mb
  V $ datafile df, dfs dba_free_space
  WHERE df.file # = dfs.file_id (+)
  GROUP OF dfs.file_id, df.NAME, df.file #, df.bytes
  ORDER BY file_name);
  
  SOURCE_DB@Server1
  TOTAL (MB): 170860.984375
  USED (MB): 152777.859375
  FREE (MB): 18083.125
  
  TARGET_DB@Server2
  TOTAL (MB): 121634,984375
  USED (MB): 92853,109375
  FREE (MB): 28 781 875
  
  Published by: Przemek P on October 9, 2012 10:48

  There are a few potential pitfalls. First of all, when you import, the definition of the INITIAL segment may be too big, using more place you expect. This can be things like adding many lines, remove them and do not reset the high watermark before an insertion above the upper limit, or sometimes old problems that nobody noticed have stayed or reproduced. Second, if you have tables that have been updated, by using the pctfree in most blocks, then pctfree is honored to import, leaving more room never-to-be-used in blocks.

  From my experience, those who do rarely estimate more than 10% to the title, but sometimes previous misadventures are not completely fixed, wasting a lot of space or using excessive space. I spend usually less computing time and time of observation. But then again, I know what to expect of my App YMMV.

• Should we leave how much free space on the C drive before affecting the performance and speed?

  Hello!

  Hard drive of my new PC (C) is 1 TB (processor Samsung 7i, Windows 8.1). It doesn't have any other disk/partition. How this space is safe to use to store large files (videos, esp., stored in the native video library file) without harming the performance and speed?

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Thank you!

  Anna

  Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:59 + 0000, AnaFilipaLopes wrote:

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Planning your Partitions

  The Question

  Partitions, how much should I have on my hard drive, what do I use
  each of them for, and what size should each one be?

  It s a common question, but unfortunately this doesn t have a
  only simple, just answer to all the world. A lot of people will respond with
  the way they do, but their response isn't necessarily best for the
  person seeking (in many cases it isn't right even for the person)
  response).

  Terminology

  First, let's rethinking the terminology. Some people ask "should I".
  partition my drive? That s the wrong question, because the
  the terminology is a little strange. Some people think that the word
  "partition" means divide the drive into two or more partitions.
  That s not correct: to partition a drive is to create one or several
  partitions on it. You must have at least one partition to use
  He who think they have an unpartitioned disk actually
  have a player with only one partition on it and it s normally
  Called C:. The choice you have is to have more than one
  partition, not that it's the partition at all.

  A bit of history

  Back before Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2 (also known as Windows
  95 (b) was published in 1996, all MS-DOS and Windows hard drives have been set
  using the file system FAT16 (except for very tiny to aid
  FAT12). That 16-bit only because were used for addressing, FAT16 has a
  maximum 2 GB partition size.

  More than 2 GB of hard disks were rare at the time, but if you had
  one, you must have multiple partitions to use all the available
  space. But even if your drive was not larger than 2GB, FAT16 created
  Another serious problem for many people - the size of the cluster has been
  more great if you had a larger partition. Cluster sizes increased from 512
  bytes for a partition to no greater than32Mb all the way up to 32 KB for a
  partition of 1 GB or more.

  More the cluster size, the space more is wasted on a hard drive.
  That s as space for all the files is allocated in whole clusters
  only. If you have 32 KB clusters, a 1 byte file takes 32 KB, a file, a
  greater than 32 k byte takes 64 k and so on. On average, each file
  about half of his last group waste.

  If large partitions create a lot of waste (called "soft"). With a 2 GB
  FAT16 drive in a single cluster, if you have 10,000 files, each
  lose half a cluster of 32 KB, you lose about 160 MB for relationships. This s
  back in an important part of a player that probably cost more than $400
  1996 - around $ 32.

  So what did the people? They divided their 2 GB drive in two,
  three or more logical drives. Each of these logical drives has been
  smaller the real physical disk, had smaller clusters, and
  so less waste. If, for example, she was able to keep all the partitions
  less than 512 MB, cluster size was only 8 KB, and the loss was reduced to a
  a quarter of what it would be otherwise.

  People partitioned for other reasons also, but back in the days of
  FAT16, it was the main reason to do so.

  The present

  Three things have changed radically since 1996:

  1. the FAT32 and NTFS file systems came along, allowing a larger
  partitions with smaller clusters and so much less waste. In
  with NTFS, cluster sizes are 4 K, regardless of the size of the partition.

  2 hard drives have become much larger, often more than 1 TB (1000 GB) in
  size.

  3 hard drives have become much cheaper. For example, a 500 GB drive
  can be bought today for about $50. That s 250 times the size of this
  Player 2Gb typical 1996, about one-eighth of the price.

  What these things mean together which is the reason to be old to have
  multiple partitions to avoid the considerable wastage of disk space left.
  The amount of waste is much less than it used to be and the cost of
  that waste is much less. For all practical purposes, almost nobody does
  should no longer be concerned about slack, and it should no longer be
  has examined when planning your partition structure.

  What Partitions are used for today

  There are a variety of different ways people put in place several
  scores of these days. Some of these uses are reasonable, some are
  debatable, some are downright bad. I'll discuss a number of Commons
  partition types in the following:

  1. a partition for Windows only

  Most of the people who create such a partition are because they believe
  If they never have to reinstall Windows properly, at least they
  He won t lose their data and he won t have to reinstall their applications.
  because both are safe on other partitions.

  The first of these thoughts is a false comfort and the second
  is downright bad. See the analysis of the types of partition 2 and 4
  below to find out why.

  Also note that over the years, a lot of people who find their windows
  partition that has begun to be the right size proves to be too
  small. For example, if you have such a partition for Windows and later
  upgrade to a newer version of Windows, you may find that your Windows
  partition is too small.

  2. a partition for installed programs

  This normally goes hand in hand with the partition type 1, a partition for
  just Windows. The thought that if you reinstall Windows, your
  installed application programs are safe if they are in another
  partitions is simply not true. That s because all programs installed
  (with the exception of an occasional trivial) have pointers to the inside
  Windows, in the registry and elsewhere, as well as associated files
  buried in the Windows folder. So if Windows, pointers and
  the files go with it. Given that the programs need to be reinstalled if Windows
  the fact, this reasoning to a separate partition for programs not
  work. In fact, there is almost never a good reason to separate
  Windows of the software application into separate partitions.

  3. a partition for the pagefile.

  Some people think mistakenly that the pagefile on another
  score will improve performance. It is also false; It doesn t
  help and often I hurt, performance, because it increases the movement of the head
  to get back to the page to another file frequently used
  data on the disk. For best performance, the paging file should normally
  be on the most widely used score of less used physical player. For
  almost everyone with a single physical disk than the same drive s
  Windows is on C:.

  4. a partition for backup for other partitions.

  Some people make a separate partition to store backups of their other
  or partitions. People who rely on a "backup" are a joke
  themselves. It is only very slightly better than no backup at all.
  because it leaves you likely to be simultaneously the original losses
  and backup for many of the most common dangers: the head crashes and other
  types of drive, serious glitches to power failure, near lightning
  strikes, virus attack, even stolen computer.  In my opinion,.
  secure backup must be on a media removable and not stored in the
  computer.

  5. a partition for data files

  Above, when I discussed separate Windows on a clean partition,
  I pointed out that separate data from Windows is a false comfort if
  He of done with the idea that data will be safe if Windows ever
  must be reinstalled. I call it a false comfort that's because
  I'm afraid many people will rely on this separation, think that their
  data are safe there and so do not take measures to
  Back it up. In truth the data is not safe there. Having to reinstall
  Windows is just one of the dangers to someone a s hard disk and not
  probably even one. This kind of "backup" falls into the same
  category, as a backup to other partitions partition; It lets you
  sensitive to the simultaneous loss of the original and the backup on many of
  the most common dangers that affect the entire physical disk, not
  just the particular partition. Security comes from a solid backup
  diet, not how partition you.

  However, for some people, it may be a good idea to separate Windows and
  programs on the one hand of the data on the other, putting each of the
  two types into separate partitions. I think that most people
  partitioning scheme must be based on their backup system and backup
  plans are generally of two types: whole hard disk imaging
  or data only backup. If you back up data, backup is
  usually facilitated by the presence of a separate with data only partition;
  to save just the score easily, without having to
  collect pieces from here and elsewhere. However, for
  those who backup by creating an image of the entire disk, there is
  usually little, if any, benefit the separation of data in a partition of
  its own.

  Furthermore, in all honesty, I must point out that there are many
  very respected people who recommend a separate partition for Windows,
  Whatever your backup plan.  Their arguments haven t convinced
  me, but there are clearly two views different here.

  6. a partition to image files

  Some people like to deal with the images and videos as something separate
  other data files and create a separate partition for them. To my
  the spirit, an image is simply another type of data and there is no
  the advantage in doing so.

  7. a partition for music files.

  The comments above related to the image files also apply to music
  files. They are just another type of data and must be dealt with the
  just like the other data.

  8. a partition for a second operating system to dual-boot to.

  For those who manage several operating systems (Windows Vista, Windows
  XP, Windows 98, Linux, etc.), a separate partition for each operating
  system is essential. The problems here are beyond the scope of this
  discussion, but simply to note that I have no objection to s
  all these partitions

  Performance

  Some people have several partitions because they believe that it
  somehow improves performance. That s not correct. The effect is
  probably low on modern computers with modern hard disks, but if
  whatever it is, the opposite is true: more music mean poorer
  performance. That's because normally no partition is full and it
  so are gaps between them. It takes time for the drive s
  read/write heads to cross these gaps. Close all files
  are, faster access to them will be.

  Organization

  I think a lot of people overpartition because they use scores as a
  organizational structure. They have a keen sense of order and you want to
  to separate the apples from the oranges on their readers.

  Yes, separating the different types of files on partitions is a
  technical organization, but then is to separate different types of
  files in folders. The difference is that the walls are static and
  fixed in size, while the files are dynamic, changing size automatically
  as needed to meet your changing needs. This usually done records
  a much better way to organize, in my opinion.

  Certainly, partitions can be resized when necessary, but except with the latter
  versions of Windows, which requires a third-party software (the and the
  possibility to do so in Windows is primitive compared to the third-party
  solutions). These third party software normally costs money and not
  any point and how stable it is, affects the entire disk.
  with the risk of losing everything. Plan your partitions in
  first place and repartitioning, none will be necessary.  The need
  to repartition usually occurs as a result of overpartitioning in
  the first place.

  What often happens when people organize with partitions instead
  records are that they make a miscalculation of how much room they need on each
  This partition, and then when they run out of space on the partition
  When a file is logically, while having plenty of space
  on the other hand, they simply saving the file in the score of "poor".
  Paradoxically, therefore, results in this kind of score structure
  less organization rather than more.

  So how should I partition my drive

  If you read what came before, my findings will not come as a
  surprise:

  1. If your backup set is the image of the entire disk, have just one
  single (usually c partition :));

  2. If you backups just data, have two partitions one for Windows and
  application programs installed (usually c :)), the other for data
  (normally D :).)

  With the exception of multiple operating systems, it is rarely
  any advantage to have more than two partitions.

• How much free space is an SSD should run optimal?

  I'm setting up an order of iMacs to be used in a working environment and my first choice is to get 256SSD and edit all photos/videos on external drives and use the internal SSD for just the OS and applications. How much space drives SSD should I run optimal?

  Thank you.

  Read the User tip linkInfo: https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-6484

  

• How much disk space for RT OS

  Hi all

  RT OS (office) has a problem: If the disk is full RT OS does not start.

  So I have to limit the volume of output of my RT application file to a reasonable value.

  To do that I read the free space on the disk with the start of my application (via GetFreeDiskSpaceEx), so that I can enshure this MY apllication will not write more data than the amount of available space (for example by removing old data).

  But I don't know how much space the operating system disk will need during the race.

  Can someone tell me a value to calculate with?

  Thanks in advance!

  Yeti0815

  A general rule is that the OS needs about 25 MB of storage for temporary files, .ini, similar persistent storage files.  Don't suck your consumption below 25 MB and you should be able to minimize your surprises.

  NOTE: This figure was obtained empirically by not-so-very rigorous tests.  Your mileage may vary.

  -Danny

• How much disk space will install and run creative cloud?

  Thinking about buying a Mac book pro and I was wondering what size hard disk to get, how will use creative cloud during installation?

  There is an indication of the size of the files for the installers here:

  Direct download links of Adobe CC 2014: 2014 creative cloud release | ProDesignTools

  Any standard Mac will have plenty of hard disk space to run the software Cloud.

  A bigger problem is how much space you need to store your data files (the files that you create with the cloud software), especially if you do a lot of audio or video.

• How much free space should I leave on a DATA partition?

  I can find discussions about why we should give adequate free space on a Windows 7 OS partition, but I can't find anything about the question to know if performance suffers if a partition used strictly for the * data * is too full.  For example, Windows 7 has a requirement to free space for Defrag to work properly?  If so, what is it?  I know that for XP defrag wouldn't even run with less than 15% free space in partition, but I don't see anything on such a restriction in 7.  And are there other aspects?  Thank you.  (Wasn't sure to put this question in "Performance and Maintenance" or "files and folders," so I chose the first.)

  AFAIK, the hard disk Windows fault detection mechanism, where the CHKDSK command is a part (the big cannon), which allows to cope with errors in small scale more or less on the fly. If the problem worsens, CHKDSK is called, and Windows stops and restarts to give a best shot at fixing the issue without distractions of CHKDSK.

  If you're lucky, CHKDSK will report the broken clusters as death, moving away from the dead zone data, and Windows will continue as usual. If the disk is full to the top, none of the foregoing can or will happen, there is no room for errors of any kind.

  So, let us free space on the disk... A data reader may not get the rigorous use that gets the C drive, but it's always a dynamic environment where files are read and re-writings on demand.

  Some bad clusters on a disk is no big deal, and the player works pretty well. The trouble begins seriously when the grapes begin to fail on a regular basis, and you will get WARNING that because Windows will appear to hang during playback of files. If you ignore this warning, CHKDSK will be finally called whenever the computer is started.

  So, no, you do not rush out and buy a new hard drive, all simply because a few bad clusters have been detected.

  Large free space reduces the loss of data? Just as much as Windows has a fairly reliable place to re - write files that had been a real struggle read less of good grapes. In this way, it also buys you time to do regular backups until you can plan to replace the drive

  Even if the 15% limit has been removed from the Defragmenter, you must always leave at least 15% free especially if you store large file sizes, but it is only a recommendation, not a hard and fast rule. Personally, I think it was a mistake to remove the limit that it just encourages computer users to fill the readers to the absolute ability to believe that everything will be fine.

• How does the merger decide how much swap space is needed when I create a CentOS guest

  I use Fusion 7 on MacBook Pro with 16 GB of RAM on OS X Yosemite. I created a VM with 4BG of RAM, but I myself only 1983 MB of swap space. I created an another VM with 2 GB of RAM and got 3999MB of swap space. Is there a formula to follow? Thank you.

  Here's what I found on the CentOS document on rules of swap space:

  https://www.CentOS.org/docs/5/HTML/Deployment_Guide-en-us/ch-swapspace.html

  I don't know how VMware products to determine what size to make the swap partition, or important to me personally because I do not use the Easy Install feature should not you if you do not want to accept the default values it uses.

  There are three basic choices, installation of a guest operating system... Using the Easy Install, manually by browsing setup of operating systems accepting the default values along the way and or modification in addition the installation along the way.  Specifically with regard to the vHDD, you can choose manually set how the disk will be partitioned partitioning and the size of the partitions.  For example, you can choose any size you want for the swap partition.

• How much creative space cloud can I create with the lightroom / photoshop lisc.

  I have 2 GB of space and not the 20 concerts that I think I'm supposed to have. How to fix?

  JMitch,

  The plan of creative photography cloud comes with 2 GB of storage. Simple Photoshop app subscription comes with 20 GB.

  Guinot

  Creative photography plan Cloud

  $9.99 / month

  Photoshop CC included + more future updates

  Lightroom included CC + more future updates

  Lightroom included Mobile

  Online creative Cloud Storage 2 GB

• How much free space should be sufficient for XP?

  My C: drive contains 23 GB to 50 GB of free space, will it be enough to run the application smoothly?

  Does anyone have any suggestions?

  Thanks in advance for your suggestions

  Well, it depends on the application you want to run. If the application requires only a small amount of memory, such as: Basic programs such as microsoft office and a few mini-games.

  I suggest to buy a larger disk memory hard if you install many applications on your computer.

• How much disk space should require a clean installation of vista?

  I want to repartition my laptop so that I can dual boot with Ubuntu. I intend to allocate 15 GB for each operating system. Will it be enough for Vista?

  Hello

  buy a bigger hard drive

  This is the best solution

  That's what I informed on updates, etc. and short on space

• I am on the Plan of A PHOTOGRAPH but I would like to add Premier Pro, how can I do and how much extra I end up paying?

  Can someone help me with this?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Please consult the pricing plans and subscription pricing to creative cloud | Adobe Creative Cloud

  Concerning

• How much space is needed to remove/cosolidating snapshots

  Hello

  I would like to delete/consolidate a snapshot. How much free space do I need on the vmfs LUNS volume.

  The virtual machine is approximately 237 GB, with all its files and snapshots.

  I only have free 44gig on the VMFS where this virtual machine.

  Any thoughts?

  Thank you

  50 + 30 + 130 = 236--> is an interesting calculation

  The foregoing is the basic disks that already exist in their (thick) full size. So when the principal/remove catches instant, you have more space.

  André