Highway-E and H.323

Similar Questions

• SX10 and H.323 by highway

  For the record, is not on the track express-E and CUCM...

  I a SX10 recorded a highway of VCS and have run into some problems when I call a Polycom RMX customers. If I call from a SX20 forced to call H.323, everything works fine, but with SIP my client will receive my audio.

  As the SX10 cannot force H.323, there is simply not yet this option, I would like the VCSE make interoperability for me. How can I configure the VCSE so that it always uses the H.323 when a specific end point registered calls him a specific endpoint or MCU point? Is this possible? The RMX meets SIP calls, if she only answered calls H.323 the VCSE course automatically would make interoperability.

  Appreciate any reply :)

  / Christian

  You should pass the SX10 at CE8.2 that just came out, it adds support for H323 for the SX10 and should solve your problem of having to use SIP only, here are the Release Notes for CE8 for reference.

  It is not an easy way to force a call using this device or this Protocol, if the calling endpoint can answer using the Protocol it is called, it will be. Yoi simply can't do with just a search rule, you must create an entirely second course area between your VCS-C/E, having active H323 and have the rule search - C for this new game of the Polycom alias box and have a higher priority than your other crossing area.

• Highway-C and highway-E and VCS Expressway

  Hello

  I'm confused by these three

  I know that expressway-E is used with Express-C track

  Their function is like VCS Expressway? or am I wrong?

  Please help to know when to use each one?

  Also why use us next to the firewall? What is the average of the crossing of firewall?

  Also, when I connect external with Jabber, is there any type of registration with each of them? I see a number taken in charge of registeration of 2500 and 5000 in the VCS Expressway data sheet

  Thank you

  Haitham

  Hi Haitham,

  In general, a point of endpoints/client must register for a 'device' so that it can be used as part of a company dial plan. This 'device' could be CUCM or a VCS and will determine if an endpoint/client is used to connect, or how the calls and form, it can be done.

  If the endpoint does NOT have one of these devices (CUCM or VCS), it could still be used (for example, a videoconferencing device stand alone), it's just that we do not see within the company structure of appeal. It may not appear in the directories, it cannot give priority to call outside, etc etc. The Jabber client has to register with CUCM either a VCS to make it work at all.

  If you use CUCM with a VCS-E, endpoints will record to CUCM. If the endpoints are internal to the company, they apply directly to the CUCM and if are external, then they will be connect via VCS-E and the recording will be dug through CUCM, so still save with CUCM.

  VCS-C/e with environment of TMS, endpoints will record VCS - c when internal and again use the VCS-E for tunnel applications from external device to the VCS - C. Depending on how you want to deploy these devices, external devices/clients could actually register directly with VCS-E, but I'm getting ahead of things. Jabber in this environment use of TMS to provide authentication of the user, even if the actual recording takes place on the VCS.

  Does that help?

  Chris

• CUCM with highways of Collaboration and mobility, a traditional VCS environment

  Hi all

  I'm positive, that I've read this in many posts before mine, or in related presentations, or the deployment of the guides, but I find it difficult to find this info now.

  I'm looking for is a simple real explanation of how VCS-C/E or Expressway-C/E pairs (or single instances) would be required for a deployment of CUCM that wanted to allow external Collaboration (if communication B2B, both the SIP and H.323), more access mobility (i.e. remote workers using Jabber or other devices for VPN less access), as well as integration with the existing H.323 estate and maybe even the comments Jabber thrown into the mix?

  As far as I understand, MRA and external Collaboration must be on separate pairs of the highway, but I can't remember if the license VCS without Expressway (although I think that it's free) can be used to provide collaboration B2B access, or if something is necessary precisely for H.323.

  See you soon

  Chris

  Hi Chris,

  you will find in the annex a PDF where on page 6-7, 16-20 is a short explanation of the difference between VCS - C/E and Expressway-C/E, also on their differences in license.
  In short - used only for ARM Expressway, Expressway-C cannot be SIP/H.323 in the office, just as a proxy for CUCM (AFAIK).

  Here is the discussion and the replica of the Cisco employee who comments Jabber and MRA may not be on the same pair of VCS/Expressway - https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12289446/jabber-guest-and-mra-same-expressway

  And you can configure B2B (XMPP Federation for example) on the motorway-E but before deployment, you must consider some limitations:

  Simultaneous internal Federation Unified CM IM and presence services, as well as the Federation-controlled external
  managed by VCS Cisco only is not supported. If a single internal Federation is required, you must use
  cross-domain Federation unified CM IM and presence Service. The deployment of the available Federation
  configuration options are:
  l the external Federation only (managed by Cisco VCS).
  l internal Federation only (managed by Cisco Unified CM IM and presence Service).
  l internal and external Federation run by Cisco Unified CM IM and presence Service, but requires
  setting up your firewall to allow incoming connections.
  the information in this document - http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/config_guide/X8-5/XMPP-Federation-with-Cisco-Expressway-and-IM-and-Presence-Service.pdf

• Customers SIP third can save CUCM via Highway and road Express-Core

  Hi all

  We are the kind of partner with Cisco in China. Our SIP in the Intranet clients can register to CUCM and make calls to the other. Now, we intend to let our customers SIP Internet CUCM registry. As far as we know, Cisco edge expressway and highway-core are required for Cisco devices is registered to the CUCM. However, we wonder if the third-party SIP clients in the Internet can join CUCM via Highway-core and Highway? After Google search, could not find a clear answer to this question. Any feedback is greatly appreciated.

  Best regards

  Chen-Che

  MRA does NOT with any 3rd party (SIP or H.323) device, endpoints only Cisco working with ARM.

  Deepak is just saying that internally, you can register as a VCS - C (and the trunk then to CUCM), and in fact, if they are SIP, x8.8 also allows recording on EXP - C, once again, internally NOT on ARM.

  You say you already save those of CUCM internally, there is even no need registration VCS - C.

• Why the 2011 State reg Highway parameters are incorrect and to run the installation program - does not work

  Highway 2011 inserted from the original disc. Indicates that the registry files have been copied incorrectly and that the installation must be executed again from the original source.

  Disc reinserted after repair, yet no different, remove program and reinsert and the message reappears. The program was OK when it is used first on 24/10/11

  and the fault appeared later that no other programs have been added since. Thank you

  Hello

  ·         What operating system do you use?

  ·         Were there recent changes made on the computer before the show?

  I suggest you follow the troubleshooting steps form the article and check if it helps.

  Error message when you install a Microsoft game or a mapping program

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/258496

  Also, try to contact the highway help and support site and check if it helps.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/UK/Autoroute/support.aspx

• Client Jabber and even ARM Highway

  Hello

  We just installed highway E and C worm X.8.2 for mobile and remote a Jabber Vpnless access and we intend to deploy comments of jabber.

  My question is this:

  • Can I use the same highway C/E for ARM and jabber comments or should I deploy an another cluster of Highway?

  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  The highway does not support the MRA and Jabberguest on the same server/cluster. Therefore, you will need to deploy an another cluster of highway...

• Upgrade to Windows 7 Ultimate and highway 2010 receives the error: "your registry settings for this application no were not copied correctly."

  I updated from XP Pro to Win7 Ultimate.

  When I try to install Highway 2010 (that I had before) I get the following message

  "Your registry settings for this application were not copied correctly. To correct these settings, run the installation of this application from the location where you originally installed it. »

  I tried the suggestions without success. So what do I do to fix this?

  I have found since that when I uninstall several files are missing, 41ce1.rbf & 41d81.rbf are later. It seems that highway will not properly work without their files (I guess here).

  So where they are or how can I get the.

  I get the same problems when I try to install Highway 2011 test, I don't buy the full program so the custom of trial run.

  Chris Townsend

  Now, I know the .rbf files are files of Roll-back.

  Hello Lrchr,

  Your question would be better addressed in the highway, streets and trips and MapPoint.
  Click here for a link to repost in the forum of the highway. They will be better able to solve your problem here.

  I hope this helps.

  Marilyn

• Need activation key for Highway 2013.

  Hello

  Someone has an activation code for MS Highway 2013 and not not not using the software.

  I am willing to pay a reasonable sum for the software and/or the key of activation/series/product number.

  I won't use misleading key generation or crack code, but Microsoft website is no help because the software is interrupted.

  Thank you very much

  Gary1181

  [Moved from the community centre of Participation]

  Hello

  Highway, Streets & Trips, MapPoint

  https://social.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?category=streetsandtrips&filter=AllTypes&sort=lastpostdesc

  Don

• Highway 2010 0xc004d301 Setup error

  Have had to reinstall Highway 2010 and towards the end of the installation, I get this error, 0xc004d301.
  I tried to uninstall via Add/Remove Programs, and then put it back.
  I get the same error during installation and when I try to run the program.

  I find references in the knowledge base for what is a corruption in the licensing system, but no idea how to fix.

  Can you please help?

  The machine running windows XP Professional and ran it perfectly last year. My relocation was an attempt to correct the error that showed up after I had not used it for a few months, that is to say last year it worked very well, this year it broke, I haven't changed anything in the meantime.

  Thank you very much.
  Bill Murphy

  Hello Bill Murphy,.

  There is a forum for problems with the highway. It is for the highway, the streets and trips and MapPoint.
  Please ask your question in the following forum.
  http://social.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/streetsandtrips/threads

  Thank you

• Highway do not authenticate outside the network

  Hello

  I followed the following procedures and documents: http://pandaeatsbamboo.blogspot.fr/2014/06/collaboration-edge-expressway...

  First question: we should set up a server of zone "course" or a "path to Unified Communications" in the area?

  I have configured a server of crossing area, but I have been warned because I have no Unified Communications Traversal area.

  My configuration:

  * X VLAN: CUCM 10.5 10.5 unit, 10.5 CUPS, ExpressWay C X8.5.1, highway E X8.5.1 (1 of 2 network adapter), DNS server, ad server

  * VLAN DMZ: highway E (the second network card)

  * Outside: External DNS

  Client Jabber works in the network, but not outdoors.
  I want to know why...

  My external DNS configuration:

  _collab - edge._tls.mydomain.fr. 86400 IN SRV 10 10 8443 expe.mydomain.fr.
  _sips._tcp.mydomain.fr. expe.mydomain.fr 86400 IN SRV 10 10 5061.
  _sips._tls.mydomain.fr. expe.mydomain.fr 86400 IN SRV 10 10 5061.
  _sip._tcp.mydomain.fr. 86400 IN SRV 10 10 5060 expe.mydomain.fr.
  _sip._udp.mydomain.fr. 86400 IN SRV 10 10 5060 expe.mydomain.fr.
  _sip._tls.mydomain.fr. expe.mydomain.fr 86400 IN SRV 10 10 5061.
  _h323ls._udp.mydomain.fr. 86400 IN SRV 10 10 1719 expe.mydomain.fr.
  _h323cs._tcp.mydomain.fr. 86400 IN SRV 1720 10 10 expe.mydomain.fr.
  _h323rs._tcp.mydomain.fr. 86400 IN SRV 10 10 1719 expe.mydomain.fr.
  _turn._udp.mydomain.fr. 86400 IN SRV 10 10 3478 expe.mydomain.fr.
  expe.mydomain.fr. 86400 IN a 130.79.192.51

  I also put my internal DNS (same name-online expe.mydomain.fr).

  Internal and external domain name is the same.

  My jabber - config.xml:

  
  
   
     fake
     mail
   
   
    CUPS_IP
    mydomain.fr
   
   
    
        mail
    
     true
     mail
     UDS
     CUPS_IP
     expe.mydomain.fr
     CUCM_IP
   
  

  A small part of my jabber log:

  *-* The query DNS _cisco - uds._tcp.mydomain.fr. has failed (QUERY_FAILED).

  *-* _Cuplogin._tcp.mydomain.fr of the DNS request. has failed (QUERY_FAILED).

  *-* _Collab - edge._tls.mydomain.fr of the DNS request. has succeeded.

  *-* HTTP request at: https://expe.mydomain.fr:8443 / oauthcb
  error message = [unable to connect to expe.mydomain.fr port 8443: Connection refused] result = [HOST_UNREACHABLE_ERROR]

  Check the connectivity of name server, querying the DNS record for "mydomain.fr."
  DetectDirectConnectUnavailable.Idle: Ignoring the event HintNetworkInterfaceDropped
  Reactor event loop incoming wait()
  About to send a dns query against mydomain.fr.
  Make a record demand. mydomain.fr.
  The purpose of dns response was NULL. Return of the query failed.
  *-* Mydomain.fr of the DNS request. has failed (QUERY_FAILED).
  *-* Available nameservers: No.

  [YLCNetworkAvailability getLocalAddress] - found IP address 0:127.0.0.1 with the interface lo0 and hardware address (null)
  [YLCNetworkAvailability getLocalAddress] - 1:x.x.x.x of found IP address, with the interface pdp_ip0 and hardware address (null)
  [TCTOnDemandVpnController connection checkForVPNConnection] - VPN triggered: failure
  [38c149dc] - checkForVPNConnection: VPN still not active, continue a loop
  -2015-05-12 15:45:33.743 DEBUG [38c149dc] - checkForVPNConnection:
  [YLCNetworkAvailability getLocalAddress] - found IP address 0:127.0.0.1 with the interface lo0 and hardware address (null)
  [YLCNetworkAvailability getLocalAddress] - 1:x.x.x.x of found IP address, with the interface pdp_ip0 and hardware address (null)
  [38c149dc] - checkForVPNConnection: loop more than 5 times, just notified listener fails
  .
  .
  .
  [csf.edge] [doNetworkSensing] DetectDirectConnectAvailable.Polling: control data: {PollingStateQuietPeriodInSeconds 60}, observeQuietPeriod: 0
  [csf.edge] [doNetworkSensing] DetectDirectConnectAvailable.Polling: will probe the visibility on the internal network, old timestamp: 0, now: 1431445609.857550
  [csf.dns] [makeDnsQuery] about to present a dns query against _cisco - uds._tcp.mydomain.fr.
  [csf.dns] [makeQuery] apply for an SRV record. _cisco - uds._tcp.mydomain.fr.
  [csf.dns] [makeDnsQuery] the response number is 1
  [csf.dns] [logResult] *-* the query DNS _cisco - uds._tcp.mydomain.fr. has succeeded.

  *-* GlobalEdgeState: connectivity news came EdgeDetectionController. Internal connectivity: 1, Edge connectivity: 1

  *-* The query DNS _cisco - uds._tcp.mydomain.fr. has failed (QUERY_FAILED).

  *-* _Collab - edge._tls.mydomain.fr of the DNS request. has succeeded.

  *-* GlobalEdgeState: connectivity news came EdgeDetectionController. Internal connectivity: 0, Edge connectivity: 1

  *-* _Collab - edge._tls.mydomain.fr of the DNS request. has succeeded.

  [csf.httpclient] [configureEasyRequest] *-* HTTP to request: https://expe.mydomain.fr:8443 / oauthcb [1]
  [csf.httpclient] [CurlHeaders] number of request headers: 1
  [csf.edge] [runEventLoop] reactor event loop incoming wait()
  [csf.httpclient] [curlCodeToResult] curlCode = error message [28] = result [timeout] = [CONNECTION_TIMEOUT_ERROR] active fips = [false]
  [csf.httpclient] [executeImpl] *-* response from HTTP: https://expe.mydomain.fr:8443 / oauthcb [1]-> 0.
  .

  2015 05-22 T 08: 48:32 + 02:00 expedition tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2015-05-22 06:48:32, 887" Module ="network.sip" Level = "INFO": Action = "Sent" Local-ip = port-Local "ExpE_IP" = "7001" Dst - ip = "ExpC_IP" Dst-port = "25064" detail = "sent response Code = 401, method = OPTIONS, CSeq = 20259, To = sip: ExpE_IP:7001, [email protected]/ * / _IP, de-Tag = 0dcff8b2490d866d, -Tag = 999d3cd6df490a60, Msg-Hash = 12398197674350600819"
  2015 05-22 T 08: 48:32 + 02:00 expedition tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2015-05-22 06:48:32, 887" Module ="network.sip" Level = "DEBUG": Action = "Sent" Local ip = port-Local "ExpE_IP" = "7001" Dst - ip = "ExpC_IP" Dst-port = "25064" Msg-Hash = '12398197674350600819' "
  SIPMSG:
  | SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
  Via: SIP/2.0/TLS ExpC_IP:5061; direction = z9hG4bK9551955efb34a48c2cd6b792a536bd371178722; has received = ExpC_IP; rport = 25064
  Call ID: [email protected]/ * / _IP
  CSeq: 20259 OPTIONS
  Starting at: ; tag = 0dcff8b2490d866d
  To: ; tag = 999d3cd6df490a60
  Server: 4130-TANDBERG / (X8.5.1)
  WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm = "Covered box (server)", nonce = "a838530126df30cd74ba54325744529a9566dbc242d5c3481360e7bd85b2", opaque = "" AQAAAMcbPL6xhSYZ8h8OfCAII / / MI6s5 "stale = FALSE, algorithm = MD5, qop ="auth""
  Content-Length: 0

  |

  2015 05-22 T 08: 48:32 + 02:00 expedition tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2015-05-22 06:48:32, 887" Module ="network.sip" Level = "INFO": Action = 'Receipts' Local-ip = "ExpE_IP" - Local port = "7001" Src - ip = "ExpC_IP" Src-port = "25064" detail = "receive the Request OPTIONS, CSeq = 46488 = method, Request-URI = sip: ExpE_IP:7001; transport = tls, [email protected]/ * / _IP, de-Tag = a809d06b2aa97ffb, -Tag is, Msg-Hash = 287994198056993872 "
  2015 05-22 T 08: 48:32 + 02:00 expedition tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2015-05-22 06:48:32, 887" Module ="network.sip" Level = "DEBUG": Action = "Receipts" Local ip = port-Local "ExpE_IP" = "7001" Src - ip = "ExpC_IP" Src-port = "25064" Msg-Hash = '287994198056993872' "
  SIPMSG:
  | Sip OPTIONS: ExpE_IP:7001; transport = tls SIP/2.0
  Via: SIP/2.0/TLS ExpC_IP:5061; direction = z9hG4bK6fe2c21c126d46e2d1b46845fd3b36071178723; rport
  Call ID: [email protected]/ * / _IP
  CSeq: 46488 OPTIONS
  Starting at: ; tag = a809d06b2aa97ffb
  TO:
  Max-Forwards: 0
  User-Agent: TANDBERG/4130 (X8.5.1)
  Support: com.tandberg.vcs.resourceusage
  Content-Type: text/xml
  Content-Length: 390

  3001500001432277312auto|

  2015 05-22 T 08: 48:32 + 02:00 expedition tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2015-05-22 06:48:32, 887" Module ="network.sip" Level = "INFO": Action = "Sent" Local-ip = port-Local "ExpE_IP" = "7001" Dst - ip = "ExpC_IP" Dst-port = "25064" detail = "sent response Code = 401, method = OPTIONS, CSeq 46488 =, To = sip: ExpE_IP:7001, [email protected]/ * / _IP, de-Tag = a809d06b2aa97ffb, -Tag = d57bee002d984276, Msg-Hash = 1512667970392998102"
  2015 05-22 T 08: 48:32 + 02:00 expedition tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2015-05-22 06:48:32, 887" Module ="network.sip" Level = "DEBUG": Action = "Sent" Local ip = port-Local "ExpE_IP" = "7001" Dst - ip = "ExpC_IP" Dst-port = "25064" Msg-Hash = '1512667970392998102' "
  SIPMSG:
  | SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
  Via: SIP/2.0/TLS ExpC_IP:5061; direction = z9hG4bK6fe2c21c126d46e2d1b46845fd3b36071178723; has received = ExpC_IP; rport = 25064
  Call ID: [email protected]/ * / _IP
  CSeq: 46488 OPTIONS
  Starting at: ; tag = a809d06b2aa97ffb
  To: ; tag = d57bee002d984276
  Server: 4130-TANDBERG / (X8.5.1)
  WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm = "Covered box (server)", nonce = "2ca920f1fc8da51e9d0e82f593610987449534d4fa5a4c7418f35c08dca6", opaque = "" AQAAAMcbPL6xhSYZ8h8OfCAII / / MI6s5 "stale = FALSE, algorithm = MD5, qop ="auth""
  Content-Length: 0

  I strongly suggest that you look over the deployment of the MRA guide.

  The area on Highway-C and E should be 'Unified Communications traversal area' as stated in the guide.  You should not use the ordinary Client/Server path box.

• Tests EX60 UCM and VCS registration

  Hello

  I did a few test with Cisco EX60 a few days ago a the following infrastructure:

  -UCM 8.6.2

  -Cisco VCS control X7.2.2

  -Cisco EX60 series

  -Csco EX90 series

  -Cisco CPIC

  -Cisco IP Phone

  The goal was to try to save the EX60 in SIP mode with UCM and H.323 mode in VCSC and make some calls with EX60 register in both devices, because I have found no documents where it was stated that only I can save EX60, EX90 in VCS or Complutense University of MADRID, but not in both at the same time.

  I recorded the EX90 in VCS and EX60 in VCS (H.323) and UCM (SIP).

  All calls to H.323 devices EX60 send control VCS and all calls all works fine without any problems. If I try to call EX90 to EX60 in SIP mode, the call will be fails. When the EX90 with EX60 H.323 call is connected, the University Complutense of MADRID and using RTMT I saw that the EX60 was on appeal or in busy state.

  -Audio call of the registered IP phone or CPIC to the AAU to EX60: I saw the call in the call control in the EX60 and RTMT and Complutense University of MADRID, but I did not see the call to the control VCS Cisco. If I try to call to EX90 to EX60 using H.323 right now, I got an EX60 busy tone. Also, if I make an audio call to EX60 for an IP phone I can do another audio EX60 call to an IP phone or an EX90. EX90 try to video negotited but calls finally was audio only.

  -The presence does not work when the EX60 is under appeal with the other end H.323 in the Complutense University of MADRID, too the BLFs do not work and does not appear the call at the Complutense University of MADRID.

  -Si EX60 is videoconferencing with EX90, the EX60 can receive an audio call to UCM get connect and the presence and the BLFs working properly.

  I find no more problems at the moment.

  Kind regards.

  This isn't a Setup program that you want to use, or register them both to the VCSC or

  Let CUCM control your end point, then h323 must be disabled.

• How can I set the resolution to 1080 p using SIP H.323 or SIP protocols H.323 by VCS on EX90, C60 both?

  Hi, I'm an engineer junior network in Korea.

  and, for the first time, I apologize for my bad writing to read in uncomportable. Sorry, as eng is not my mother tongue.

  I tested on SIP to SIP and H.323 to H.323 call. These cases are all correctly, in 1080P(1920*1080),

  BUT

  SIP to H.323 or H.323 SIP dosen't work through VCS. The types of devices are EX90, C60.

  Status of devices: HD-resolution activated license, 6000K, the default bandwidth

  and there is no external problems, because it is the TURN of test on the same LAN.

  I tried several times, but these devices connect sometimes 720P(1280*720) and sometimes each other 1080 p resolution.

  Is anyone knows how to put the devices in trouble their 1080 p not 720 p resolution?

  I'll look forward to your good kindness.

  Please read my bad writing.

  Jinsung salvation.  It would be important to know what SW version running on the CV.  Before X7.1, VCS would set lines for SIP step of BW calling in 1920, and this is fixed in this version.  I would like to ask, if you can, upgrade your VCS to X7.1 and try the call again.  It is perhaps what is you covering for the moment and achieve 1080 p on Interworking call.

  CSCtx32717

  Symptoms: A call interworked will find its video bandwidth, capped at 2 Mbps in one direction.

  Conditions: Video sent by the side of the SIP in the H323 will be capped at 2 Mbps. This may cause a different codec being chosen, or a lower bandwidth on the favorite codec.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/VCs/release_note/Cisco_VCS_Release_Note_X7-1.PDF

  You can try:

  Workaround would be to set optimal definition to high on both
  
  endpoints or avoid interworking to achieve 1080p in the meantime.
  
  Let us know the outcome.
  Thanks in advance.
  VR
  
  P2

• Highway-C & E MRA connection TLS certificates

  Unable to get X8.2.1 Expressway-C & E to form a TLS connection to the course of ARM.  We have generated an SSL certificate using a client certificate template and server on a Windows Server CA and downloaded this certificate to the highway-C and the chain of authority to the express-E track, but the TraversalClient area is unable to establish a TLS connection.  The event log shows "unable to get local issuer certificate".  Yet the certificate Client test tool shows the certificate is good when checked.  Under SIP of certificate revocation checking is set to Off.  Can anyone tell why the TLS connection form?  Thank you.

  I'm pretty sure that one of the deployment guides (perhaps with respect to the certificates, perhaps with regard to the deployment of VCS) said that wildcard certificates are NOT supported. This seems to be common on another type (e.g. Lync) UC platform

• Can we use licenses of the highway on the highway VCS?

  Dear team,

  We have 10.5 CUCM, control VCS, MCU, ISDN GW TMS Infrastructure deployed in one of our customer place. Now the client asking the Internet settings to be able to join CUCM registered endpoints. But we got the highway licenses and so we installed aboard the VMinstance Highway and installed licenses, now my query is this set works? Otherwise, we can transfer those licenses to expressway VCS?

  Please suggest!

  Hi Eric,.

  In brief - customer is working to achieve both Business - to - Business (B2B). Yes, that can be reached. Note: You will need to have the right set of licenses.

  Note: you mentioned VCS control and the edge of the highway. So, what are the components you have in the network? Control of VCS and VCS Expressway or VCS Expressway-Core and VCS Expressway-edge?

  Kind regards
  Chirag