Host CPU is not compatible with the requirements of the virtual machine to CPUID

Similar Questions

• Cannot use 'lab1' host because the host CPU is not compatible with the judgment of the virtual machine suspend state.

  I see that this error was mailed here, but can't seem to find a position with a resolution.

  We use Lab Manager 4.0.4 and just upgraded the hosts in our laboratory.  Before updating to ESXi 4.1 ESX 4.0 u1, we cancelled all VMs in all configurations.  There is none who were suspended, they were all turned off.  We have improved vcenter 4.0 to 4.1 as well.  We moved from a dell poweredge 1950 with two quad core intel L5410 to a r610 with two quad core intel processor E5506.

  When I try to turn on some of the lab configurations (our VM models all work fine), I get this error:

  • Cannot use 'lab1' host because the host CPU is not compatible with the judgment of the virtual machine suspend state.

  I threw the State for the lab configuration (even if it was turned off and cancelled) and still get this message.  I guess the processor architecture of these chips is quite similar, and both are Intel.

  If I go into this directory of Manager of laboratory inside the data store for one of these virtual machines that does not light and add to the inventory, he turned and starts fine on my server esxi 4.1.  So how do Lab Manager to get account it's well deploy and start it?

  Hey billk.

  Although not supported completely, you can solve it by going to the SQL of Lab Manager database.  Make sure that you back up your database before you do anything like that.

  Open the table "fsdir" and corresponds to the dir_id with the id Lab Manager VM.  Once you find the relevant line, change suspend_proctype_id to null (Zero-Ctrl).  You can do this while Lab Manager is still running.

  The results can be unstable (i.e. Windows can crash if it was a drastic change of CPU), but at least you look at a hard reset.  The bat reset certainly not being able to return to the previous state.

  Also note that while Lab Manager does not include CVS, if you activated, your virtual machines still work in CVS mode.  If you have a mixture of heterogenious of hosts in a cluster for Lab Manager, you can see this question pop up a lot.  There is absolutely nothing wrong with take back the virtual machine because of the VCA, but Lab Manager thinks otherwise and prevents it.

• Host CPU is not compatible with the requirements of the virtual machine in the level 0 CPUI register x 1 'ecx '.

  I have a cluster of three ESX servers.  They are IBM 3650 and they are the exact same material bought at the same time.  They even the same exact versions of the firmware (bios, bmc, nic firmware, HBAs, raid, HDD firmware, rsa, etc.).  I started their reclassification of ESX 3.5u3 to ESX4 with all the latest patches.  Then I updated one moved some top vm and upgraded vmware tools and virtual materials without problem.  So, I went and upgraded the following ESX Server and has started moving the machines on that one and upgraded vmware tools and virtual hardware.  I tested the functionality of the ESX servers and they seem to work fine.  I vmotioned machine version 4 hardware virtual machine between the two developed level ESX host very well so I me with the upgrade process.  Then I had to vmotion, one of the virtual machines updated (version 7 of material) between the two ESX hosts newly improved and they won't vmotion.  It gives me the error CPU host is not compatible with the requirements of the judgment of the VM to CPUID level register 0 x 1 'ecx '.  The full error message is in the attachment.

  Apparently, the virtual machine hardware upgrade exposed a few additional things virtual machine that prevents vmotion to work.  I don't know what and I'm quite surprised because these machines are identical identical hardware and firmware.

  All of the suggestions.

  This is a known unfortunately problem

  http://KB.VMware.com/kb/1011294

• VMotion error: host vmware cpu is not compatible with the requirements of the judgment of the VM to CPUID level register 0 x 1 'ecx '.

  Problem: I can't move my Exchange vmserver2 a vmserver1 server.

  Error: "host vmware cpu is not compatible with the requirements of the judgment of the VM to CPUID level register 0 x 1"ecx"

  
  Details:

  Vmware KB:

  * Ensure that the hosts have the same features enabled in the BIOS of the servers. If there is an incompatibility between the servers BIOS configuration even if they are physically identical, they always show a compatibility error message. The two most common to check features are the No-Execute memory Protection (NX / XD) and virtualization technology (VT / AMD - V).

  A ran the CPU utility Vmware as referenced by

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 1003718

  
  "CPU that have similar features. "This means that the need of processors from the same manufacturer (AMD or Intel), be of the same family (Pentium, Xeon, etc.), and have common features extended between ESX servers involved in the VMotion.

  My results:

  vmserver1 Dell Inc.    PowerEdge 2950 2 Intel Xeon E5405 of CPU @ 2.00GHz
  vmserver2 Dell Inc.    PowerEdge 2950 2 Intel Xeon L5410 of CPU @ 2.33 GHz

  They both share exactly the same characteristics:
  FT support
  Enable VT
  VT Capable
  NX/XD
  FFXSR
  RDTSCP
  SSE
  SSE2
  SSE3

  Support Relaxations:
  NX/XD
  RDTSCP

  Relaxations unsupported:
  All THE features of the SSE
  FFXSR
  CMPXCHG18B

  In the 'Show Windows debug' it reads 'of the compatible CPU"

  This virtual Exchange machine works since Esxi version 3.5.  I am testing now vCenter Server 5.0 with version 5.0.1 on the Esxi server.

  Note: I've also been meeting random uses CPU high, leading from Windows Server 2008 to lock up completely.  I have found no trace of problems within the Windows host and Vcenter is not questions.  I have "reset" of the virtual machine in order to get the server back online.  The CPU to the top lock is random and the server can run for days with no problems. * Don't know if it's related...

  Virtual host config Exchange computer:
  Guest operating system: MS Windows Server 2008 64 bit
  version 8 of virtual machine
  CPU: 4vCPU
  Memory: 10240MB
  Overload memory: 420,61 MB
  vSphere HA Protection: protected
  Host CPU consumed: the 209 MHz

  Maps: vmserver1 watch "CPU is not compatible" CPU: 0% (none of the virtual machine running)
  Consumed host memory: 9823,00 MB
  Active memory of Fords: 409,00 MB

  Views of storage: I have a warning symbol on the QNAP iSCSI disk that hosts the virtual Exchange computer but I see no record... I'm new here...

  I understand that vmotion apply restrictions on the movement of VM compatibility to avoid it.  The components of the HA does not apply to these requirements.  We tested yesterday HA, succsessfully and this how we came to be stuck with the Exchange vm on vmserver2 and it cannot migrate to vmserver1.

  I appreciate your time and consideration,
  Tim

  It seems that you have two different processor speeds. Try the VCA mode and also check the BIOS version you and make sure they match.

• VMware ESXI host Client is not compatible with the Ipad

  Hi all

  First of all I want to say that I am very happy with the introduction of the ESXI host Client, it's a very good start for not having a vSphere client to be installed.

  One thing I was hoping too is compatible with mobile devices, for example, an IPad. Unfortunately this isn't the case. Not for IOS 8 or 9

  I tried several browsers without a bit of luck.

  There are several problems;

  • The page is not scaling properly
  • The top bar is not visible, you can, for example, sign out
  • The Web page expands when you rotate the page on the iPad horizontally, not having not not able to see the Web page complete.

  I found these problems in Tech Preview, build 2015.08.25.3015331 combined with ESXI 6 with the latest patch

  Kind regards

  Marcel

  Hi Marcel,.

  Thanks for pointing out these problems. We have made a few improvements wrt. support iPad in the last version of the adventure. Could you update and let me know how it goes?

• the other hard drive to the host system does not show in the virtual machine

  I tried but I couldn't find an article on how to get the other host hard disk appears in the my window of the computer of the VM guest.  I don't want a virtual disk or anything like that, just access the other hard disk of the local host without having to map a drive to it if possible.  Thank you!

  Physical disks are not supported on VMware Server 2 (at least not via GUI options).

• Host CPU is not compatible

  Recently, I have rebuilt my VM relax from U 1 4.0 ESX to ESXi 4.1 with the latest updates. I have a 3 hosts who are identical in specs, all three are ML370 G5 HP servers. I have a Virtual Machine that gives me headaches. I can not migrate from the last host, I created. I get the following error message:

  Host CPU is not compatible with the requirements of the virtual machine to CPUID level 0 x 1 'ecx' register

  Bits of the host: 0000:0100:0000:1000:0010:0000:0001

  Required: x 000: x 000: 0000:10xx:xxx0:xx1x:xxxx:x 001

  Inconsistency detected for these features:

  * General incompatibilities

  If possible, use an active cluster with vMotion compatibility (EVC) Enhanced; See article 1003212. In the absence of EVC, see article 1993.

  The weird thing is that I can move to two other guests very well. I have all hosts patches at the same level, VMtools upgraded the virtual machine. I have no problem moving any other VM to this host. I'm going to create a cluster, but I want to assure that I can move all the VMS to all guests, first of all. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Pete

  If you can try this

  1. Turn off the virtual machine.
  2. Click on the link change the settings of the virtual machine.
  3. Click the Options tab.
  4. Select mask CPUID under Advanced.
  5. Click Advanced.
  6. Click on reset default.
  7. Click OK.
  8. Click OK again.
  9. Turn on the virtual machine and migrate.

  .. .or you can just try and it turns off, remove the inventory, browse the data store, add to the inventory on the other host.  Then see if you can vMotion.

• Win2K8 - this processor is not compatible with the 64-bit mode

  This is my first shot to create a virtual machine VMware

  We just got a new server in a data center

  Its windows 2008 Server. (the 64-bit version)

  My plan is to run a Server 2008 ontop of a host of Server 2008 virtual machine

  First I used a converter for P2V - this bit has been successful, so basically I took a picture of the host and converted to a Virtual Machine.

  I put the image to use 1 core of the dual core CPU and the memory (4gig) half and half of disk space on drive D (50 GB)

  Then I installed virtual server 2, and any

  Then I installed the thing that makes you see the window in Internet Explorer (some may be active x thing?)

  In any case, at the time of starting the server VM, I get the message:

  -

  ---

  Windows Boot Manager

  Windows could not start. A recent hardware or software change might be the cause. to solve the problem:

  1. Insert your windows installation disc, and then restart your computer

  2. choose your language settings

  3. click on repair your computer

  If you do not have the disk contact sys admin...

  file: \windows\system32\winload.exe

  status: 0xc000035a

  Info: attempt to load a 64-bit application, however this CPU is not compatible with the 64-bit mode.

  -

  ---

  I'm a little confused on this, the server is located in a datacenter somewhere and I don't think that the CD option is viable, because they will probably be responsible for a lot of things to do

  Any ideas what I should try?

  the cpu is 64-bit but because I split at the image, I'm not sure if that is break things

  Any advice appreciated

  Thank you

  You can run virtual servers, they simply can be 64-bit because your processor doesn't support VT

• After the installation of Windows Vista, I get this error: winload.exe tries to load a 64-bit application, but this processor is not compatible with the 64-bit mode.

  I recently installed Windows Vista on my Dell Inspiron 6000. This installation is completed successfully, but when I tried to start, I got an error message:

  Winload.exe

  Attempt to load a 64-bit application, however this CPU is not compatible with the 64-bit mode.

  I've been clean installation Windows Vista Home Premium. I already had Windows XP Media Center 2004. What should I do?

  Thank you

  Ryan

  Hello

  Do a clean install of XP with the XP disk provided by Dell, if you.

  http://pcsupport.about.com/od/OperatingSystems/SS/instxpclean1.htm

  If you do not have your XP disk, you can contact Dell and ask them to send you a XP disc.

  They should do this for a small fee.

  You need to change the Boot order to make the DVD/CD drive 1st in the order of startup and startup disk:

  How to change the Boot order in BIOS:

  http://pcsupport.about.com/od/fixtheproblem/SS/bootorderchange.htm

  "How to replace Microsoft software or hardware, order service packs and replace product manuals.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/326246

  Vista installation was able to destroy this option of relocation:

  And if you have never received a recovery disk when you bought your computer, there should be a recovery Partition on the hard drive to reinstall XP back on how you purchased your computer.

  The recovery process can be started by pressing a particular combination of the key or keys at startup. (Power on / start)

  A Dell must rely on Ctrl + F11 at STARTUP to reinstall XP

  See you soon.

• I have Webroot Security and Firefox is not compatible with the malicious URL part of the program? How can I protect myself?

  When I downloaded Firefox and checked my extensions, I've been informed that Firefox is not compatible with the prevention of malware from my Webroot security package. I use it successfully with Windows and just renewed for another year. What do you do to protect myself? I'm not a computer expert, so if you can answer in plain language that would be appreciated. In addition, we stream video much and I noticed that DivX is also not compatible. What should I do about it? Thank you.

  Firefox has had its own fake Web / since 2008 malware protection.
  
  http://www.Mozilla.com/en-us/Firefox/phishing-protection/

  Firefox Add-ons developers are responsible for these add-ons up to date as new versions of Firefox are available. Check with Webroot & DivX on updates for their Firefox extensions.

  That said, the modules that are hosted on the official website of the AddonsMozilla.Org are tested and 'hit' by compatibility automatically, if these modules are considered to be compatible with a new version of Firefox that is about to be released. For modules that are not "compatible", the developer of the add-on Gets an email telling them basically what needs to be fixed. AMO extensions hosted are automatically updated as required by Firefox. The 'check' available updates each time is that Firefox is open.

  For modules that are not hosted on AMO, there is a 'updateURL' function that allows to have Firefox check for an update across the internet, the a particular extension developer said. Unfortunately, too many developers take advantage of this feature and needlessly let their users to search an update themselves. who then need to manually install the hotfix or update version.

  It's like a bunch of clowns of circus without master ring to 'bring in the clowns' at the right time in the show.

• Old favorites are not compatible with the version 20 + Firefox

  General information:
  I use the old client version 3.6 given that an old utility addon author stopped update and will not work with the new revisions. Despite disabling the update featured on: config and in preferences, the browser refreshes still finished (initially I was using 3.4 and would prefer to use that, but no matter how I try I can is no longer cancel 3.6 to 3.4 even if I reinstall using an Installer 3.4). Accordingly, I had the habit of keeping a copy of my directory of firefox where it updates again without asking, she has. This could help the guy out to meet countless people who have lost their favorites because of the upgrade released this year and I hope that someone to investigate and release a patch/utility to fix the problem.

  Question:
  I checked that the most recent customer since at least version 20 and leave, are not compatible with the old bookmark JSON files. Those who have been upgraded to the latest revision not only lose their favorites, but cannot restore them either, as Firefox only returns the error message: "unable to process the Backup File.

  I confirmed that the files themselves are perfectly intact with no sign of corruption and are as expected. Restore ok old revisions of browser (in my case specifically 3.6), they will not restore the most recent customer reviews. This isn't a fault with bookmark backups, but with new clients (I guess they changed the way they store information in the JSONs at some point. I note in the code for the JSONs GUID has never been used in old revisions, but it is in the most recent revision. Maybe it's causing an incompatibility problem? You just need to adjust the client so that it looks for the GUID and if none can be found to ignore it rather than decide that the file is corrupted.

  Old JSON Code snippet: {"title":"","id":1,"dateAdded":1306666129870000,"lastModified":1306670152435000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"placesRoot","children":[{"title":"Bookmarks Menu","id":2,"parent":1,"dateAdded":1306666129870000,"lastModified":1381254048121000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"bookmarksMenuFolder","children":[{"title":"Recently Bookmarked","id":6,"parent":2,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4,"mimeType":null,"type":3,"value":"RecentlyBookmarked"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:folder=BOOKMARKS_MENU&folder=UNFILED_BOOKMARKS&folder=TOOLBAR&sort=12&excludeQueries=1&excludeItemIfParentHasAnnotation=livemark%2FfeedURI& maxResults = 10 & queryType = 1 "}, {'index': 1,"title":"Recent Tags", 'id': 7, 'parent': 2,"annos": [{'name':" places/SmartBookmark', 'flags': 0, 'expires': 4, 'mimeType': null, 'type': 3, 'value': 'RecentTags'}], 'type': ' text/x-moz-place', 'uri' ":" place: sort = 14 & type = 6 & maxResults = 10 & queryType = 1 ""}, {'index': 2, 'title': id '',' ': 8, 'parent': 2, 'dateAdded': 1294868015246000, 'lastModified': 1294868015246000, 'type': "text/x-moz-place-separator"}

  New JSON Code Snippet: {"title":"","guid":"5rkFafJ6AnRZ","id":1,"index":0,"dateAdded":1396387525168000,"lastModified":1396387525168000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"placesRoot","children":[{"title":"Bookmarks Menu","guid":"m7vLM41-lzQi","id":2,"index":0,"parent":1,"dateAdded":1396387525168000,"lastModified":1396387526173000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"bookmarksMenuFolder","children":[{"title":"Recently Bookmarked","guid":"BEffyw6xva93","id":13,"index":0,"parent":2,"dateAdded":1396387526172000,"lastModified":1396387526172000,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4 ,"value":"RecentlyBookmarked"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:folder=BOOKMARKS_MENU&folder=UNFILED_BOOKMARKS&folder=TOOLBAR&queryType=1&sort=12&maxResults=10&excludeQueries=1"},{"title":"Recent Tags","guid":"WmnlbVv38Bjv","id":14,"index":1,"parent":2,"dateAdded":1396387526172000,"lastModified":1396387526172000,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4,"value":"RecentTags"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:type=6&sort=14&maxResults=10"}

  Solution?
  In my case, I had a copy backup of the old directory for review. To restore I opened the copy and export bookmarks as an HTML, that I restored in the most recent client. If you don't have a copy of the former client, the best thing would be to try and re-install an older revision of the customer and either make a copy of the program folder and use another copy of that you can use the new and old customers and you worry about the loss of an older revision, since you'll always have 2 copies of the former client (the one you use the one that you use to restore in the case of at level). Or export bookmarks to an HTML element, and then upgrade the client to the newest and import the HTML instead of JSON files.

  Please review and create a more simple solution to a problem of stupid incompatibility. ^_^

  There are a number of operations in the file places.sqlite which are obsolete.
  For example,.

  setItemGUID (aItemId, aGUID) obsolete since Gecko 14.0 - returns a unique global identifier for the element. This is mainly for use by extensions that synchronize data between different profiles bookmark.
  
  
  
  Former id snippit:
  "title": "','id': 1,"dateAdded": 1306666129870000,"
  New snippit
  {"title": "","guid": "5rkFafJ6AnRZ",""id ": 1, 'index': 0, 'dateAdded': 1396387525168000"}

  There are other identifier here has changed, I think in version 14
  «Note: the importHTMLFromFileToFolder() method has been removed in Gecko 14.0 (14.0 Firefox / Thunderbird 14.0 / SeaMonkey 2.11).»

  But more likely the former is Netscape format: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libra.../aa753582%28VS.85%29.aspx

  I tried this however: I installed the old version (3.5) and updated to the current version. All my favorites were there. I had to check the updates and could not skip certain steps of 3.5 to 3.6 for example. He then went from 3.6 to 12, then with todays update went straight to 30. They're all here. However nothing is perfect, backup is recommended as well.

  Back to your question, makes it easier for backward compatibility, my hypothesis is that they changed with the updates and ignored some versions. Saved profiles or places.sqlite files may be missing this change because the format changes in the update?

  My suggestion would be filing a bug at this request, providing a few cases where this would be necessary. Currently only the current version of Firefox is supported, which can leave us to the work around that you are currently using.

  Reference documentation for the developer of the places :

• My Itunes does not save my iPhone saying that the backup is damaged or is not compatible with the iPhone.

  I / m trying to backup my iPhone 5, but the iTunes says it is not possible because the backup is damaged or is not compatible with the iPhone... What should I do?

  What version of iTunes you have? The most recent is 12.4.1. Try downloading this version and controlled again.

• Not compatible with the version26.* Add-on

  LightBeam add-on not compatible with the latest version of android firefox. What should do?

  Hello BudIsland, add-on (currently?) is available for firefox on desktop, not the android version: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/lightbeam/

• Firefox worked, today has not started with the error the version of this file is not compatible with the version of windows you are using.

  Computer is Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit. Firefox has work fine for over a year on this computer. Nothing has been changed or updated updated except Windows update indicates that it installed updates on August 19. I had computer week before because only out of town, back entrance and began August 18, but Firefox has worked that day. Does not use FF again until today. Today August 22, firefox does not start, shortcut icon changed program not there. Exe in the folder when you click Poster error message says the version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows, I am running. Exe of Firefox shows created on 20 August. I suspect the update, Windows or FF but lean towards windows, which was spent, who broke things. I noticed that IE 10 updates, updates of .NET framework and the malicious software removal tool have been installed. I tried to restart the computer, has not set. Tried to run as administrator, did not work. I don't want to uninstall FF, at least have to because of all the things I have here, bookmarks, last past passwords, etc..

  Hello

  Some Firefox problems can be solved by performing a clean reinstall. This means that you remove Firefox program files (not the profile folder, where the bookmarks are stored) and then reinstall Firefox. Please follow these steps:

  Note: You can print these steps or consult them in another browser.

  1. Download the latest version of Firefox from http://www.mozilla.org office and save the installer to your computer.
  2. Once the download is complete, close all Firefox Windows (click on quit in the file menu or Firefox).
  3. Remove the Firefox installation folder, which is located in one of these locations, by default:
     • Windows:
       • C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
       • C:\Program Files (x 86) \Mozilla Firefox
     • Mac: Delete Firefox in the Applications folder.
     • Linux: If you have installed Firefox with the distribution-based package manager, you must use the same way to uninstall: see Install Firefox on Linux. If you have downloaded and installed the binary package from the Firefox download page, simply remove the folder firefox in your home directory.
  4. Now, go ahead and reinstall Firefox:
     1. Double-click on the downloaded Setup file and go through the steps in the installation wizard.
     2. Once the wizard is completed, click to open Firefox directly after clicking the Finish button.

  Please report back to see if this helped you!

  Thank you.

• 16.0.2 Firefox is not compatible with the zone alarm Forcefield AGAIN. Please, help users with that. No current positions

  Before I updated to the current version, I checked for "reserves" and found nothing to indicate that the Zone Alarm Extreme Security, ForceField was not compatible with the Version 16.0.2. If I had known that I would not have updated. Y at - it no use for those of us who have this problem. ? The only post I noticed on this problem is 'closed' and dated about 8 months ago.

  Thanks for the reply, the old Fox!

  I agree with you 100%. This occurred without fault to each new update of Firefox.

  I wish that Firefox had warned users of the incompatibility issues with ZA ForceField, as they have done with other problems before users downloading the latest version of Firefox.

  Thank you also for the link to the "release notes", which I didn't have before. It is a help in the future.

  Warm greetings,

      Boudica