HP DL360 gen9: logical processor of difference

Similar Questions

• How do you calculate the logical processors in vmware

  When I see via Vcenter console to below two hosts:

  first host via vcenter console found Dell R900 there 4 physical CPU taken each socket supports 6 hearts. The Socket is Intel Xeon x 7640 it shows 24 logical processors.

  The second host via console found R910 Dell vcenter, she has 4 CPU sockets physical each socket supports 6 cores. The Socket is Intel Xeon x 7540 it shows 48 logical processors.

  why there is difference of logical processors. and how it was calculated.

  The difference is that on the second host hyperthreading is enabled - a logical processor is a physical core or the Hyperthreaded where a virtual cpu will be scheduled.

• Logical processors against vCPUs per ESXi host

  Hello

  I am watching the host ESXi Configuration of maximum and to matters that I don't know what's the distinction between the logical processors for each ESXi host (160) and vCPUs per ESXi host (2048). Any explanation is greatly appreciated. Thank you!

  Hmm...

  OK I'll try to explain.

  1LCPU can be pinned to several virtual machines.

  If I have 1 quad core CPU, I have 4 LCPUs

  I can create as many virtual machines

  (1) 1 VM with vcpus 1

  (2) 1 VM with 2 vcpus

  (3) 1 VM with 4 vcpus

  1st VM will be pinned to 1 LCPU.

  2nd VM will be pinned on the 2nd, 3rd LCPU.

  3rd VM will be pinned to LCPU 1,2,3,4.

  If the processor reqquest comes from 1 VM and VM 3rd at the same time, she will be the process queue and do accordingly!

  I hope you have it now!

• Quick Q on logical processors on ESXi 4.1

  Hello

  On our server Esxi 4.1, we have 2 x processors quad core (xeon e5640)

  In the VI Client lists:

  processor = 2 Sockets

  cores per socket = 4

  and then the bit I do not understand...

  logical processors = 16

  Can someone explain why the logical processors = 16 and not 8? Someone asked me and I didn't know the answer!

  See you soon,.

  Huw

  Hello

  HT is enabled which is why you see 16 logical processors instead of 8

  See you soon
  Artur
  

  Please, do not forget the points of call of the "useful" or "correct" answers

• Logical processors

  Hi guys,.

  Maybe this is a stupid Question.

  If I have a cluster that has 4 hosts. Each host has 4 x Quad Core Processors (not Hyper Threading), that gives me 16 logical processors for each host a total of 64 logical processors in my Cluster.

  Does that mean that I could create only 16 VMS with 4 CPU?

  Thank you

  VMware currently recommended as a guide for vSphere - 4-8 vCPUs per core - 6 usually. so a box Quad-cores should accommodate 96 VMS, assuming there is enough memort, disk and network - but you're right more resource consuption the virtual machine requires less of these virtual machines you can host on a single ESX/ESXi server - this is why it is essential to have the resources the VMS invited-

  If you find this or any other answer useful please consider awarding points marking the answer correct or useful

• What is a difference between 'Logical processors' and 'logical processors for each host?

  Hi all!

  In the official document VMware "vsphere-51-configuration-maxima" or "vsphere-55-configuration - maximums.pdf" in the section "ESXi host maximum rates------Maximums calculation" exists in the elements:

  "Maximum CPU------logical CPU for each host ' (vSphere 5.1: 160;)   vSphere 5.5: 320)

  and

  "Machine virtual maximums------virtual CPU by host ' (vSphere 5.1: 2048;)    vSphere 5.5: 4096)

  Question: what is the difference between the two?

  And a more complex thing to maximum rates:

  Virtual machines per host: 512

  Number of hosts per cluster: 32

  Therefore, the cluster may be Virtual Machines (maximum): 521 * 32 = 16384

  But in the document, we have only 4000 VMs in maximum.

  Why?

  Thank you

  Ramirez,

  I understand your question as difference between 1. logic virtual CPU vs / by the hosts and 2. cluster/host Max County VM.

  Consider the case below;

  2 servers ESXi - 20 mV

  ESXi taken 1-4, 2 cores / socket

  ESXi 2-8 Sockets, 2 cores / socket

  Now here number of CPU logic-(4 x 2) + (8 x 2) = 24

  20 virtual machines - 2 jacks, 2 core / socket

  Virtual CPU count - 20 x (2 * 2) = 80

  Hope your first confusion is clear now.

  And a more complex thing to maximum rates:

  Virtual machines per host: 512

  Number of hosts per cluster: 32

  Therefore, the cluster may be Virtual Machines (maximum): 521 * 32 = 16384

  But in the document, we have only 4000 VMs in maximum.

  Why?

  This means that even if you have 32 Guest and each host can accommodate 512 VMs each the maximum number of virtual machines per cluster may not exceed 4000. And it does not mean that you can have a maximum of VMS (512 * 32).

  ~ dGeorgey

• Server has 80 logical processors, but I can only use 8 cores for a virtual machine

  We have a host of ESXi 4.1 with four 10 processors and we want to give a VM 20 vCPUs for a test, but I can choose only 2 virtual Sockets with 4 cores per socket or 1 virtual socket with 8 cores. What is the maximum I can do? I'll attach screenshots so you can see what I'm looking at.

  With vSphere 4.1 eight-way virtual SMP is the maximum that you can configure with the Enterprise Plus license. With vSphere 5.1 the maximum has been increased to 64 channels for businesses more (32 channels for the company).

  André

• Codec DivX 6.8.5 (4 logical processors) problem. Need help!

  
  

  Hi Yangtze,

  For the codec problem - I would recommend test avi different filters and see which works best.  To see what filters you have available on your computer, use the GetAVIFilterNames and this will fill a list for you.  From there, you can test to see which gives you the desired playback performance and compression.

  For the problem of Eve - in your VI, call an AVI fence and fence IMAQdx?   It sounds like you might not close all your references, and if you leave them open, even closing LabVIEW is not guaranteed that this.   Tryadding to your program.

  See you soon,.

• Processors logics esxi

  Hello world.

  I know there is a lot of documentation on the issue, but all the information that makes me feel even more confused.

  The question is simple: "in esxi 5.5" ".

  • NO HyperThreading
  • Intel Xeon CPU E5-2407 v2
  • processor 1 socket
    
  • Cores per socket 4
  • 4 logical processors.

  
  

  How many virtual machines can I run?

  I understand just 4. One by logical processors.  But I'm running 5, so I do not understand the question.

  
  

  Thank you all
  

  
  

  Hello

  the amount of virtual machines, you can run is more limited by the amount of RAM that you allocate to the virtual machines, since each VM you start needs at least little RAM to start.

  ESXi has no problem with the use of a logical basis for several virtual machines.

  When you create more and more virtual machines, each logical heart will serve X vCPUs. If it's good or not depends on your applications and their need for resources.

  I run up to 5 by heart logical vCPUs in our environment and it works well because the applications need a lot of time CPU.

  Tim

• The ideal comments processor for a CPU i7 3820 host settings?

  Hello world

  I use a Windows 7 (x 64) computer that uses a processor Intel Core i7 CPU 3820 (@3.6 - 3, 8 GHz). The processor consists of 4 physical processors and a total of 8 logical processors.

  

  I noticed in VMware Workstation (10 v) that there are a number of settings of the processor for the guest operating systems. I can only imagine that different guests work best with a variety of settings of the processor.

  Of particular interest to me optimizes the processors for XP (SP3), Windows 7 (x 64) and invited Windows 8.1.

  If anyone can shed some light on the following comments related issues processor it will be greatly appreciated-

  (1) 1) which is the ideal combination of the 'number of processors' versus 'Number of cores per processor', for example: if I want my guest to run with 4 cores, is it better to have one), or b) after?

  one).

  

  (b).

  

  I noticed that none of the guests accept the settings below (However, I suspect that the limitation is in fact with the guests of CPU!).

  

  (2) with regard to the "Preferred Mode" setting under "virtualization engine" section is each any merit using one setting other than "auto"? Assuming that there is a preferred mode, so what's the preferred mode for my host CPU?

  

  (3) what is the effect of tick "disable acceleration for binary translation"?

  

  All the answers to the above questions will be greatly appreciated.

  Kind regards

  David

  iVirtual75 wrote:

  Hello world

  I use a Windows 7 (x 64) computer that uses a processor Intel Core i7 CPU 3820 (@3.6 - 3, 8 GHz). The central unit consists of 4 physical processors and a total of 8 logical processors.

  

  I noticed in VMware Workstation (10 v) that there are a number of settings of the processor for the guest operating systems. I can only imagine that different guests work best with a variety of settings of the processor.

  Of particular interest to me optimizes the processors for XP (SP3), Windows 7 (x 64) and invited Windows 8.1.

  If anyone can shed some light on the following comments related issues processor it will be greatly appreciated-

  (1) 1) which is the ideal combination of the 'number of processors' versus 'Number of cores per processor', for example: if I want my guest to run with 4 cores, is it better to have one), or b) after?

  one).

  

  (b).

  

  It makes no difference.

  I noticed that none of the guests accept the settings below (However, I suspect that the limitation is in fact with the guests of CPU!).

  

  Consumer versions of Windows won't make use of more than two takes.  The virtual machine should work correctly, but you two completely inactive vCPUs.

  (2) with regard to the "Preferred Mode" setting under "virtualization engine" section is each any merit using one setting other than "auto"? Assuming that there is a preferred mode, so what's the preferred mode for my host CPU?

  

  The automatic setting is intended to be the most powerful.  However, in some cases, it is not.  For modern Windows clients on your CPU, the Auto selection will be Intel VT-x/EPT.  While EFA (extended page tables) provides the best performance for most workloads, it suffers from a large fine of TLB miss.  If your workload is a TLB (e.g. specjbb) buster, so you might get better performance without EPT.  Binary translation can be a victory for some workloads on 32-bit Windows XP, due to frequent bouts of TPR.

  (3) what is the effect of tick "disable acceleration for binary translation"?

  

  Normally, the binary translation only applies to the kernel code and user code runs directly on the processor.  If you disable acceleration for binary translation, all the code will be run using the binary translation.  The result will usually be catastrophic performance.  Why would you do?  Due to the nature of binary translation, some things aren't quite reason code user running directly on the processor-level.  If your applications are particularly sensitive to these differences to run natively, you may need to disable acceleration if you want to use the binary translation.  On hardware that supports Intel VT - x, hardware-assisted virtualization is usually a better option than VT without acceleration.

• vCPU vs logical CPU

  Hello

  I would like to know, when a vm (1vCPU) runs and to stay on the same host, it remains on the same logical processor? If this is not the case, what are the conditions for the coscheduler for the calendar on an another lCPU?

  I myself remember a long time ago I read something saying that the Scheduler changes the lCPU manages the vm vCPU several times per second?

  is this still true in vi3.5 or vsphere?

  Thanks for your replies!

  L2 cache memory is bound to nuclei.

  It's true!  MATERIAL.  There is your answer.  You are overthinking the situation.

  You install ESX or you install Windows, what has changed?  NOTHING.

  It makes no difference to HOW they manage their internal process.  The L2/L3 cache is at the hardware level.

  Yes, I know you are thinking about a virtual machine has its own nuclei, but you would be wrong, that those are time sliced on the material through the visor Hyper.

  the cache is on the hardware of the CPU.

• HP Pavillion P6347c: Allow the processor cores

  This is the second time that I post this question, now with more information. I ran the HP Hardware Diagnostic and Test "Multicore" informed me that "only two of the four cores are enabled. How to activate the other two hearts? When I search the computer for the amount of available cores, it is said that two nuclei, yet all other research say that there are four cores of the processor. When checking with the Manager tasks two cores work. The processor is the AMD Athlon II X 4 630 processor. I checked in msconfig and still only 2 cores are available. Here, any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Hello

  Device Manager displays both physical and logical processors.

  Download CPU - Z to verify that you have actually 4 cores and 4 wires. The default CPU tab shows the number of hearts and son down.  This tools will flush out the inaccuracies with Windows may report errors.  This tool should "dispel" you.

• Pavilion dv6 Notebook PC: I can pass on my HP Pavilion dv6 Notebook PC (memory, processor, graphics)

  My dv6 became very slow. I am running Windows 10 and now it takes 15-20 minutes to wake him up from his sleep and connect. Ive done a lot of cleanup and optimization, but nothing got better on that. It get very hot very quickly and the fan always seems to be at the top. I'm looking to try to upgrade the memory and perhaps the (quad-core) processor at least if possible, to see if the performance is going to do better. I can hardly do anything on this issue now because it takes too long! I have a 1 TB of HDD installed there a few years and who works well, but everyday navigation, products microsoft office and editing photo/video light from time to time are almost impossible! What memory and processors are compatible with my device that I could look in the upgrade? Any help is greatly appreciated! I'm new to upgrades of memory and others so I had a bit of a problem of the research/understand exactly what I would like to search! I will post the form below!

  Thank you!

  Data sheet:

  Name of the OS	Microsoft Windows 10 Pro
  
  Version	10.0.10586 build 10586

  System manufacturer	Hewlett-Packard
  
  System model	HP Pavilion dv6 Notebook PC
  
  Type of system	PC x 64
  
  System SKU	XG740UA #ABA
  
  Processor	Intel (r) Core i3 CPU       M 370  @ 2.40 GHz, 2 Lossnay, 2399 Mhz, 4 logical processors
  
  Version of the BIOS/Date	Hewlett - Packard F.29, 07/11/2011
  
  SMBIOS Version	2.6
  
  Embedded Controller Version	101.56
  
  BIOS mode	Legacy	

  Physical memory (RAM) installed	4.00 GB
  
  Total physical memory	GB 3.80
  
  Available physical memory	716 MB
  
  Total virtual memory	7.67 GB
  
  Available virtual memory	1.26 GB
  
  Page file space	3.86 GB	

  You have a model dv6-3155dx. Here are your specs:

  http://h20564.www2.HP.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docid=emr_na-c02548013

  Here is the Service Manual:

  Manual

  See p. 23. Your laptop has the CPU i3 - 370 M and UMA (Intel HD) video so, unfortunately, the processor is not extensible because it is soldered to the motherboard. Put video updated would also require the replacement of the motherboard. CPU upgrades are very difficult and rarely justify financially, in any case, but in your case is not possible at all unless you replace the motherboard, which is even more expensive and less be justified financially. The cost of high end motherboard and CPU and work, you might as well buy a new laptop.

  But all is not lost. The best upgrade, you can do is to install an SSD. You can also switch to 8 GB of RAM. An upgrade will be useful, together, they would be a game-changer.

  You would need 2 x 4 GB modules specified thus:

  Memory module (DDR3 PC3 - 10600 1333 MHz) - 4096 MB 599092-001

  https://www.Amazon.com/HP-VH641AT-4-GB-DDR3-PC3-10600/DP/B0030L3B8E/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8 & qid = 1472066313 & SR = 8-1 & Keywords = 599092-001

  This model is very, very picky about the memory and it must have 8 black blocks on the side, not 4. Also very intolerant of memory not specified in general. Remember that I bound will work. 'How to' on the manual p.60.

  SSDS are a little harder to choose (as many options) and what I need to know is your budget. I recommend at least a concert 500 class SSD and which will cost $120-160. Since you have 10 Windows, it would be easy to download the Microsoft recovery media directly and simply reinstall, then find the drivers and applications and migrate the data. The installation will be ignited automatically the first time that the computer is connected to the internet. You can also clone the existing content of the new SSD hard drive, but I do not recommend with a facility that is malfunctioning.

  We also probably discuss blowing dust and verification of thermal management in general. A laptop that suddenly becomes very slow, as you describe may have a hard drive problem, too. You need to run diagnostics on the hard drive and also just to check to see if it is full. Drops of performance as a rock if the hard disk reaches 90 percent and more capacity.

  Let us know if you have any other questions.

  If it's 'the Answer' please click on 'Accept as Solution' to help others find it.

• What happens when you specify multiple iterations of the parallel loop that you have processors?

  I have an app that does the same things together up to 10 times for different material resources. For example, I have a list of 10 COM ports I want to send orders series. I want that they be executed as close to synchronous as possible, but up to 200 ms sync would be acceptable. Currently, I use a loop set up to 10 parallel iterations and assume that LabVIEW will juggle processors according to the needs, the iterations run it as simultaneously as possible. Experimentally, LabVIEW indeed seems to create 10 parallel loops, even when running on a computer with only 4 logical processors, otherwise you go 10-element inside the loop would only be not able to complete, right?

  My question is, I'm doing something verboten with my number of iterations of the loop? According to the help of LabVIEW for loop iteration parallelism dialog box: "If you plan to distribute the VI on multiple computers, set number of instances of parallel loop generated equal to the maximum number of logical processors, you wait for one of these computers contain never.» Clearly I'm violating this opinion and yet it seems to work. My performance will essentially be the same as if I had 10 blocks of code in parallel on the block diagram?

  "Reading'how many Threads don't LabVIEW allocates?" links to this page, it seems that, at worst, LabVIEW is hungry for thread and switching of threads between iterations, but my short demand slowing down enough to accommodate this suboptimal situation. At best, LabVIEW has allocated 4 threads per the enforcement system, so as long as I have at least 3 processors, there are at least more son than the parallelized loop iterations. It's all a bit confusing.

  RnDMonkey wrote:

  I have an app that does the same things together up to 10 times for different material resources. For example, I have a list of 10 COM ports I want to send orders series. I want that they be executed as close to synchronous as possible, but up to 200 ms sync would be acceptable. Currently, I use a loop set up to 10 parallel iterations and assume that LabVIEW will juggle processors according to the needs, the iterations run it as simultaneously as possible. Experimentally, LabVIEW indeed seems to create 10 parallel loops, even when running on a computer with only 4 logical processors, otherwise you go 10-element inside the loop would only be not able to complete, right?

  My question is, I'm doing something verboten with my number of iterations of the loop? According to the help of LabVIEW for loop iteration parallelism dialog box: "If you plan to distribute the VI on multiple computers, set number of instances of parallel loop generated equal to the maximum number of logical processors, you wait for one of these computers contain never.» Clearly I'm violating this opinion and yet it seems to work. My performance will essentially be the same as if I had 10 blocks of code in parallel on the block diagram?

  "Reading'how many Threads don't LabVIEW allocates?" links to this page, it seems that, at worst, LabVIEW is hungry for thread and switching of threads between iterations, but my short demand slowing down enough to accommodate this suboptimal situation. At best, LabVIEW has allocated 4 threads per the enforcement system, so as long as I have at least 3 processors, there are at least more son than the parallelized loop iterations. It's all a bit confusing.

  In this case (where you're interacting with the external hardware and have an appointment) there will be a delay of inheirant at each iteration.  THUS, "Oversubscibing" or by allowing the parallel proceedings as logical processors, actually improves performance by running another period of waiting during the iteration.  In fact, you're not "Violate the advice" of oversubscibing.  You use this technique correctly! Just may not have read about this.  See Esp PP 4

• WinXPx64 6core i7 machine running a single processor. Is winXPx64 a multiprocessor system?

  OS WinXPx64, the Intel i7 6core, 2xATI over-pants 2450, 12 GB DDR, 1 TB of HARD drive.
  I heard that Windows XPx64 OS was a SMP support bone, but when the system using Cacheman 7.1 monitoring and execution of the trading platform of Ninjatrader 6.5 I see one processor CPU manages the data and all other core sporadically lower than 11% data processing.
  Complex system runns platform Ninjatrader very well, but when I open a profile chartting that consumes about 3.5 GB of DDR memory, only processors core is doing ALL the work and the system hang.
  If it is 'Idea' of Microsoft to an acceptable method of multiprocessor manipulation it sorely lacking, big time.

  Windows XP Professional x 86 & x 64 are the two able multiprocessors.  Please note that multi-core is not the same thing as multiprocessor and all versions of Windows XP manages the multi-core as logical processors processors and that they can manage and make use of multiple cores.  Please note that Cacheman is nothing else that snake oil and powder would be better without this useless application (it does that push code and data on labor sets in the pagefile, productively enough silly and contrary to 'improve' the memory usage!).

  The request must be written correctly to make effective use of multiple cores or multiprocessor, according to software publishers that NinjaTrader 6.5 is not fully optimized to take full advantage of the multi-core or multi processors.  On their web site:

  [Quote]

  NinjaTrader 6.5 supports multi-core/multi-multiprocesseur material. Internally, NinjaTrader supports multiple threads of executions, which would be managed by the Windows operating system on different cores/processors. However, NinjaTrader 6.5 is not optimized to make full use of material multicore / multiprocessor.

  NinjaTrader 7 comes with optimized multi core/multi-multiprocesseur support. Please see the link below for more information.
  http://www.NinjaTrader.com/webnew/NT7/NinjaTrader7.html

  General application performance
  This is an area that we spent a lot of time on the preparation of NinjaTrader 7. We re-written the basic sections of the application to be more efficient in terms of memory usage and CPU usage.

  However, due to the nature of the operating system Window, NinjaTrader 7 would not be able to use fully all the available multi-cores/multi-processors at some point.

  [excerpt]

  http://www.NinjaTrader.com/support/forum/showthread.php?t=30000

  John