HP Elitebook RAM running frequency values lower than possible hardware (factory setting)

Similar Questions

• Remove values lower than the desired increment

  Hello

  When you perform a simulation of multi-body with a step size fix that I receive some additional values smaller than the normal increment in output data or values are duplicated. The time channel looks like:

  0

  0.0002738

  0.001

  0.002

  0.002

  0.003

  0.004

  ....

  I think that with a simple script I can remove the extra valuues (in this case 0.0002738, 0.002).

  E offer this code, but it does not work:

  Hello Fischerg,

  I would like to know how it works:

  Option Explicit
  Dim timechannel, CLength CNumber, dBase, limit, K, CurrValue, Epsilon, Delta

  timechannel = "[1] / TIME."
  CLength = Val (ChnPropGet (timechannel, 'length'))
  CNumber = NOC (timechannel)

  Epsilon = 0.00001
  Limit = 0.001 - Epsilon

  dBase = CHDx(1,CNumber)
  For K = 2-CLength
  CurrValue = CHDx (K, CNumber)
  Delta = CurrValue-dBase
  "Compare using the value of the Epsilon. Compare float numbers
  "with '=' does not always work
  If (Delta< limit="" )="" then="">
  CHDx (K, CNumber) = NULL
  On the other
  "Set new base
  CurrValue = dBase
  End If
  Next
  Call ChnCharacter (timechannel)
  'Delete tagged values. If there are more channels in parallel to the string "TIME."
  "those who can be adjusted with the same call. See the online help for ChnNovHandle for more details
  Call ChnNovHandle(timechannel,"","Delete","X",1,1,0)

• Percentage of battery PC stopping at values lower than 100%

  I have a Samsung laptop for almost 5 years, running Windows 7, and last year, I had some problems with my battery that couldn't charge more. I decided to replace the battery and so I bought a new 3/4 months ago. However, this battery is already getting a few problems I've ever seen. It is possible to recharge, which is good, but the battery percentage never reaches the value of 100%. In addition, the values that it prevents become lower and lower: last week it stopped at 80%, but this week can't go more than 50%. I presume that in several 1/2 weeks I won't be able to use it.

  I think it is my laptop that is, somehow, to "destroy" the batteries, but I already searched on the internet and not a clue. How can I solve this problem?

  Thank you

  Nuno

  Hello!

  the power on the power cable converter box may sometimes have problems. Unplug the device from the laptop, inspect the cable, see how hot the box is. Check the PIN that goes into the laptop. All the lights indicating the load or the power cable. the small icon in the taskbar wiggle cable see if the icon changes.

• Memory running at a lower frequency

  I recently added 1 GB 667 DDR2 ram to my office, a1514in Pavilion (previously 1 GB 667 stick). But now the bios is show my DRAM frequency as 266 MHz (PC2-4200), these are the cases with different configs:

  -If I put only OLD stick of 1 GB 333 MHz (PC2-5300) show

  -If I put only NEW stick of 1 GB it will show 266 MHz (PC2-4200)

  -If I put both OLD & NEW 1 GB stick will show at 266 MHz (PC2-4200)

  Has also tried different machines slot but no use (I have only 2 slots and memory support for my system max is 2GB BIOS version 3.24)

  I am not able to understand what the problem is. In CPU - Z under the SPD, the two sticks are showing similar settings (I have not so good idea on these parameters). Please help me why the new RAM runs at a lower frequency... What should I do?

  Hello Khot
  
  What is the model of your Samsung of RAM stick?
  
  According to the specifications of your motherboard RAM supported, speed isn't PC2-4200 and PC2-5300.
  
  Another thing, usually by mixing different RAM is a bad idea. The reasoning is that each RAM stick is intended to be run at a specific frequency, timings and voltage. If two sticks use different frequencies, timings, tensions that the BIOS will be all run the highest common denominator. In your case, that your new stick of RAM PC2-4200 and, therefore, the BIOS reads your second stick is run at the same speed for stability purposes.

• REP-1213: field refers to the column at a frequency lower than his group

  Is it possible to do a field that is located on a lower level group to be displayed in a group that is at a higher level in the report?
  
  I have a field that is in a group of lower level on a report, and I want it to appear as a header, a group which is a level above his own group. The field must remain in the original group, but should not appear in the report as a column within the original group but should appear under the heading.
  
  I tried and received the error REP-1213: reference field column to a frequency lower than his group, but how can I get what I want to do without getting this error? Is there a way to show this field in the header without moving in the group header? Should I create an alias or function or what and how?
  Help, please.

  user8655468 wrote:
  Sorry, I do not seem to get to you. MY report has 2 groups of repetition. The first group student_name, course_code, course_name and the 2nd group academic_year, module_name, module_code and module_grade. Academic_year which is the 2nd group should appear as a Cape as well as the elements of the first group, but may not be moved from its original group because it goes with the modules. The report displays a history of modules of a 1st year student for the current year for the school year the header will present the current academic year for a student.

  I do not understand how I should use a column of synthesis to achieve what I want to do. Please can you explain more. Thank you.

  I think you know about the analytical column. If your school year is filed, you can use it to the analytical column. Being a function of synthesis sum. You take this analytical column to group 1 and select the source of the 2nd group. Then display the 1st frame.

  Hope this will help you...

  If someone useful or appropriate, please mark accordingly.

• Is there a new 'fix' for a 9 year old XP Home computer that runs a lot slower than it used to? I do the interview, but nothing works

  In 9 years. I re XP 5 times because it was the ONLY done fixthat my Dell Dimension 8250 run fast. I kept all the updates, ran the cleaners of files, defragmented the hard drive, put the parameters to performance don't not Visual, even added more than 512 MB ram (1 GB total) that has MADE for a month or 2 really speed things up, but it is also to slow. The last time I put the XP disk in there was this msg: "Setup cannot continue because the version of windows on your computer is newer than the version on the CD. ANY HELP is HIGHLY appreciated as this is the measure of my ability of fix - it - happy to post here any info you need to diagnose this bottleneck problem, thanks, Patrick

  Do yourself a favor. After your next relocation and after you get it until you're happy with it (install SP3 and all subsequent security patches, install all the programs that you use regularly, install a good antivirus, install the latest versions of Adobe Flash and Java, etc.), make an image of your hard drive. This way you will EVER need to reinstall your OS again! Acronis and Paragon are good programs. DriveImageXML is a good gift (but doesn't have as many features as imaging programs paid).

  About the General slowness, here are the usual causes:

  1. malware (malware). You need to rule out first! This page has excellent information:

  http://Web.archive.org/Web/20080610163247/http :// www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Removing_Malware

  2. some programs aimed at combating malware (for example, Norton and McAfee). Ironically, they can slow things down because they use simply much too many resources. Sometimes they cause conflicts with other programs. And their default mode is to scan your entire hard drive whenever you start. Fortunately, there are other programs of anti-malware software available that use much less resources (p. ex., NOD32, Avast and Avira).

  3. too much of certain types of programs still running in background - with or without your consent. (Then again, a lot of programs running in the background of the consequences trivial.)

  To determine each program and process, you are running, use the task (Ctrl + Alt + Delete) Manager and click the processes tab. You should be able to sort by CPU usage or memory usage for a good ideas that are resource/memory hogs. You must write the names of all the processes for future detective work (or take a snapshot and print it).

  Use these sites to determine what these programs are, and learn how configure them to not always run when starting:

  http://www.PACS-portal.co.UK/startup_content.php#THE_PROGRAMS
  http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/startups/
  http://www.AnswersThatWork.com/Tasklist_pages/Tasklist.htm

  Sometimes, it is recommended to use msconfig to configure programs to run at startup. A better, more thorough program is Autoruns:

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb963902.aspx

  But before that, you must use the settings preference of the program in question. Otherwise, for some programs, they will return to the list of startup anyway!

  If you do not want to use msconfig, it can be accessed in this way:

  Start | Run | Type "msconfig" (without the quotes). Enter (or OK)

  4. not enough RAM, causing the PC too rely on the pagefile. A quick way to determine if what is happening is to open (Ctrl + Alt + Delete) Task Manager, and then click the performance tab. Then the three values under Commit Charge (k) Note: in the lower left corner: Total, limit and peak.

  The Total number represents the amount of memory you are using right now. The vertex figure represents the maximum amount of memory you made since the last boot. If these figures are lower than the value of the amount of physical memory (K), then you probably have lots of RAM. In case you want to study it more, you can run the Page queue Monitor for Windows XP:

  http://www.dougknox.com/XP/utils/xp_pagefilemon.htm

  5. you can also verify that the access mode of your hard drive has not changed from DMA to PIO:

  http://www.technize.com/2007/08/02/is-your-hard-disk-CDDVD-drives-too-slow-while-copying/

  and

  http://winhlp.com/node/10

• The SAR values lower blackBerry 10-&gt; BB phones sold!

  Dear community,

  Dear BB smartphone antenna developers,

  I would like to highlight the fact that the lowest values of SAR (specific absorption rate) of mobile phones have been achieved by Samsung in the last six years. Models Samsung Galaxy have extremely low values of about < 0.4="" w/kg.="" a="" detailed="" list="" of="" phone="" models="" and="" sar="" values="" can="" be="" found="" on="" the="" german="" website=""> http://handywerte.de/index.php.

  Samsung Galaxy phones are a very good quality of voice despite the fact that they «radiate less» Therefore, I wonder why Blackberry is not to low values of SAR, either? There is a great sales potential for Blackberry that there are a lot of clients who have chosen a phone regarding the SAR value - and today chose Samsung.

  Despite the fact that there is no scientific study that shows a harmful effect of radiation of mobile phones on human health, Blackberry could sell a lot more phones with lower values of SAR - threre is still a lot of people out there attention to the value of the DAS.

  With greetings

  BBsupporter

  Hi BillJ,

  you're right, of course, values low SAR are not the only reason to buy a phone and, thus, do not automatically match higher sales rates.

  If you find people who are interested in ras values or not, depends on the audience target, you ask: for example, if you support the business customers who need to ensure security and stability in the communication systems of their company, the fantastic features of the phones blackberry and services (I love blackberry, incidentally) is the main goal.

  However, I am an engineer in electrical engineering and have worked in the field of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). When you work with EMC, after awhile, I had to deal with a citizen initiative about the radiation from cell phones. I was surprised and realized that there are actually people who think a probably harmful effect of radiation of mobile phones on human health.

  As I said, I am an electrical engineer, and it is until today NO scientific evidence for any harmful effect of the radiation from cell phones. But let's look at it with a BB sale economic point of view: there are different reasons for people to buy a cell phone: a good OS, bright screen, good camera, long term, battery, comfortable keyboard, elegant body, large memory, brilliant speakers, etc... If there are people out there, who want a low das, then let me tell you that there is NOTHING that can be done more easily than a lower SAR!

  For example, to significantly improve the camera, you will need to use better lenses, a better sensor and maybe the software will need to be adjusted for a better signal image processing (noise suppression). This means a significant effort for BlackBerry. As an EMC engineer I can tell you that the effort to change the SAR is significant - it requires only slight changes in the design of the antenna. So if the effort is practically zero, why not do it?

  What's my motivation? I love BlackBerry devices and want just BB to succeed again. It is sad to see that blackberry had so much problems in the past. For example, I think that opening the door for Android in the OS 10 is absolutely necessary and will win back customers.

  So, my post on the SAR was just to suggest how BlackBerry can accomplish some specific wishes of customers even better. If the effort to change the design of the antenna is practically zero, if there is virtually no cost for the changes, and the voice quality can still be excellent (as indicated by Samsung Galaxy devices), so why not reduce the SAR?

  Kind regards

  BBsupporter

• JPS-00080: credentials 12.1.2.0.0 store schema Version is lower than the latest version of schema 12.1.3.0.0, upgrade the store schema of credentials to the latest version.

  JPS-00080: credentials 12.1.2.0.0 store schema Version is lower than the latest version of schema 12.1.3.0.0, upgrade the store schema of credentials to the latest version.

  Hi all

  When you try to extend my domain, it fails with the above error.

  any suggestions on a fix?

  is this related to the Fusion Infrastructure ADF RCU utility?

  Thank you

  Hi JCGO,.

  Installed on your DB schema is 12.1.2.0.0, but the Extension of domain requires 12.1.3.0.0.

  One solution is to run the 12.1.3.0.0 UCR, fall of the existing on your DB schema followed by installation 12.1.3.0.0 on the DB schema, so that the extension of area Gets the 12.1.3.0.0 schema

  Something more is to open the template on which you spread the field. The models are present in ${MW_HOME} / oracle_common/common/models/wls, explore requirements inside the yourtemplate.jar and comment out the store schema version prerequisite credentials. This is not a good approach, but again, it's going to be a good solution since the schema 12.1.2.0.0 and 12.1.3.0.0 won't much difference.

  Thank you

  Shiva Shankar B N

• ORA-01438: value larger than the precision specified for this column?

  Hi guys:
  
  I'm stuck in this error when I try to do an insert into a table. My Source has 581K records, but only this code and the values described below gives me a headache.
  
  Here's the DDL for the source and the target.
  
  CREATE TABLE WRK. VL_FREED
  ('CODE' VARCHAR2 (9))
  NUMBER (15.7) "VL_FREED".
  )
  
  CREATE TABLE WRK. VL_RENEG
  ('CODE' VARCHAR2 (9))
  NUMBER (15.7) "VL_RENEG".
  )
  
  CREATE TABLE WRK. WRK_XPTO
  ('CODE' VARCHAR2 (9))
  NUMBER (15,10) "VL_XPTO".
  )
  
  ------------------------------------------------
  The values for the VL_FREED AND VL_RENEG tables:
  
  
  CODE = 458330728 (same on both)
  VL_FREED = 191245.3000000
  VL_RENEG = 74095.3800000
  
  -------------------------------------------------
  
  When I try to run this insert:
  
  INSERT INTO WRK. WRK_XPTO
  (
  CODE,
  VL_XPTO
  )
  Select
  T1. CODE,
  T1. VL_FREED - T2. VL_RENEG
  of WRK. VL_FREED T1, WRK. VL_RENEG T2
  WHERE
  (T1. CD_CODE = T2. CODE);
  
  I got the error:
  ORA-01438: value larger than the precision specified for the column
  
  But how can this be? The result of 191245.3000000 - 74095.3800000 is not greater than a number (15,10).
  
  Can someone help me on this?

  Number (15,10) means 15 total digits, 10 of which are to the right of the decimal separator, leaving only 5 on the left.

  190 000 - 75 000 = 115 000 (6 digits).

• Does anyone else have a problem with the left speaker is much lower than the right?

  Any source that I use the left speaker is much lower than the left. If I put my finger on the right I can feel the pressure of air pushed but not by the left. Is it an iPhone defective 7?

  Hello, TopDog16!

  Welcome to congratulations on getting a new iPhone and Apple support communities 7.  From what I see in your post, you have any questions on the stereo speakers in your new iPhone.  I would be happy to help you with that!

  Indeed, your iPhone has holes on both right and left sides on the lower edge (on each side of the connector of the Lightning).  The holes on the right are only speaker on this edge of the phone, however.  The other speaker in the pair is at the top of the phone, where the cut is, just above the screen.  Check here to see if sound comes out.

  This page has a large diagram of the iPhone of 7 speakers (in the section entitled "Buttons and external connectors"): iPhone 7 - technical specifications

  Have a great rest of your week!

• Audio MP3 and .mov audio playback in a lower than normal field.

  Randomly, some Web sites audio mp3 or audio .mov plays at a lower than normal tilt in Firefox.

  Have you checked the settings in QuickTime player?

• Read byte with a value up to 127 lire byte with an ASCII value greater than 7F (127 dec)

  Hello

  I have to read a byte with a value greater than 127, Labview turn 27.

  In help I saw that Labview provides a description of ASCII that pour values ranging up to ' 127.

  What do I need to do?

  LabVIEW 6.1

  Windows XP

  Hello

  I want to read a byte with a maximum value of 127, but Labiew reurn arround 27 value

  How do I do?

  

  Rigid wrote:

  Thanks for your help. I'm not changing lyke I understand (my English is poor quiet...)

  I have another program that communicate with the instrument. I know byte (6) must be greater than 18 (greater than 7F actually).

  But with Labview, I'm only 18.

  While it might be higher than 18 x, an I8 is signed, and therefore it cannot be greater than x7F - it has a range of-128 to 127. A U8 is not signed, and it's why he has a range from 0 to xFF. However, x 18 is the same if you treat as signed or not signed. I don't see how LabVIEW can read a wrong value on the serial port. Are you sure you're looking at the correct byte? Your code shows that you split the chain twice. Are you sure that you do this properly?

  Given that you use on Windows you can recheck the chain received using PortMon. Allows you to see what is actually received by the driver for the serial port on Windows.

  P.S. I actually meant the whole byte function.

• Why the 2d graphics score is much lower than the 3d

  upper graphical desktop score is significantly lower than any other partition on the windows experience index. The index is just a waste of time or is there a reason for this 1 score to be much lower

  upper graphical desktop score is significantly lower than any other partition on the windows experience index. The index is just a waste of time or is there a reason for this 1 score to be much lower

  The score is less on your computer because your video (graphics) card was obviously designed for its 3D graphics was paramount while 2D was a secondary function.  (You have a game system).

  What specific video card do you have?

• Validation rule of error to a value greater than $999,999,999,999.99.

  A validation rule of error for an input value of the user of something higher to $999,999,999,999.99 seems to work only when the amount is 1,000,000,000,100.00 in Oracle policy Automation when written as a Word document rule.

  If the value is implemented at the level of the attribute, then it works for the maximum value of $999,999,999,999.99. And immediately places an error for any value greater than $999,999,999,999.99 even a value of $1,000,000,000,000 is picked up. However, it will be against best practices which is the mixture of source and validation rules.

  I tried all kinds of conditions such as rounding, truncation etc and none seem to work correctly outside validation of the attribute levels.

  @

  Looks like you have to face a maximum value for the validation.

  Do you really need set a very high maximum value? I suggest you enter a maximum value that is a little less than 999,999,999,999.99

  See you soon

  Frank

• Store the value less than the current week and the year.

  Hi all
  
  I have a table called BACK, which structure is like this
  

  ITEM_NUMBER   YEAR_WEEK   MS
  ...........   .........   ..
  1N58          2012-WK02   01/15/2012
  1N58          2011-WK02   01/15/2011

  current my procedure I store the value in my new table that is less than the current week. But I want to retain the value less than the current week and the current year. Please, help me to get how I can do this.
  

  PROCEDURE BACKLOG_PROC_LT_CW IS
    BEGIN
   DELETE BACKLOG_LT_CW;
   COMMIT;
        INSERT INTO BACKLOG_LT_CW
          SELECT 
                DC_UTIL.GEN_YEAR_WEEK(MS) YEAR_WEEK,
                ITEM_NUMBER,
                MSD
  
                FROM BACKLOG
            where to_char(MS, 'IW')<to_char(sysdate, 'IW');
  
    END BACKLOG_PROC_LT_CW;

  Currently, with the above code is to store the value in my table of BACKLOG_LT_CW but if you see the data in the table from the BACK you will find YEAR_WEEk 2012-WK02 falls next year, but again it is store in my table because IW took only. Please help me get the soln
  
  Thanks in advance
  
  Concerning

  Are you looking for this?

  ...
  where to_char(MS, 'YYYYIW')