Ideal for RAID array

Because have a new video workstation built last autumn I used installer disk hard next five:

C: / OS & programs

D: / sound & video Media & CS5Projects

E: / swap file & media Cache

F: / Previews and exports

H: / other multimedia files (Photoshop, and al.)

This week I pick up a controller from Areca ARC-1880ix-16. With it, I will implement an array of RAID3 eight discs with a hot swap.

I tend to simply set up a unique folder for every video project that will contain all files previously stored on drives D, E and F. Before that, however, I want to solicit the comments or suggestions of others using RAID arrays.

The IMO = Im my opinion. See your the Internet Dictionary

The disk performance for the reader where export is stored is not very critical on export. CPU/GPU/memory is the usual bottleneck and exporting to: keep the fill rate on your lower raid, that you access two drives (raid and (H) at the same time instead of one (raid).

Tags: Premiere

Similar Questions

  • Dell PowerEdge 2900 - need to use internal drives for RAID

    Hi all

    I am the I.T. guy for small business from my father. I help them on the side.

    They have recently purchased a PowerEdge 2900 server used with 4 internal SCSI drives

    This server also has a Dell SAS 5 / i integrated controller

    I want to install Windows 2008 R2 standard on this server and use it as a file server and a place to host QuickBooks Enterprise.

    The problem, in that I am running is that I can't find in the Bios or anywhere in the server startup utilities where I can configure the 4 internal drives as a RAID 5 array. I want to do this and THEN install the Windows Server operating system. I used the last Build Server utility Dell and also updated all the firmware to the latest versions. The Build Server utility doesn't let me configure the RAID array.  What I'm missing here?

    Thank you very much for your help!

    I upgraded to a PERC 6 / i integrated RAID controller and now problem is solved. Just need a new controller internal RAID.

    Problem is solved!

  • PowerEdge T110ii using PERC S100 for RAID 10

    I read that I can use S100 to implement a RAID 10. I bought 4 new drives (1 TB). I have installed in the system. They're all here and work. I went to the disk installation and created the virtual and selected drive all THE DRIVES and RAID 10. I then RECORDED. Now, he wants to install the operating system. I click and get to the point where it says WHICH DRIVE DO YOU WANT to INSTALL? It shows all 4 disks. What's wrong? I thought that since it's now a RAID on 1 disk. So I thought that maybe it would do during the installation of the operating system. No, it does not. When I get the OS installed it shows now 4 readers of all readers in a distinct way. What I am doing wrong? What is the size of the disks? Now, I have done this process 3 times and I keep hope for something different.

    Hello

    You create the table of the system and Documentation or System Build and Update Utility disc management tools? The configuration of the berries for the S100 work well with this installation disc.

    Boot from THE RAID controller's BIOS via R CTL and create the matrix RAID it. Then boot from the installation disc and go to the section where you create the RAID array.

    Thank you

  • Need for Raid-1 Setup in Windows 7 operating system.

    Aims to set up a House on RAID-1, accessible via Internet server in the future, hopefully with a domain name.
    Refurb purchased HP A6528 and two 2 nine WD Black 750 GB HARD disk.
    HARD drive connected to SATA 0 and SATA1.
    Compatible RAID in the BIOS.
    The machine restarted, you press F4, then Ctrl + I and creating a RAID volume using maximum (two volumes of 698 GB show as 'members')
    Clean install Win7 Home Premium (64) obtained via the participation of the College via MSDN.
    The installation program set aside space 100 MB 'reserved' and OS loaded in C:\ with a 698 GB boot volume.
    Open disk management. As a single volume (volume0) is displayed. Right clicked and making 'dynamic', and rebooted.
    Reopened on disk management, and fault tolerance indicates 'no '.
    Tried to do a right click to "Extend Volume", but it has always been grayed out (I AM an administrator).
    Repeat this process with the same results.
    What Miss me to set RAID 1 fault tolerance?

    Hi FSLoar,

    Thanks for posting. If I understand your facility, you have a hardware RAID on your motherboard configuration. With this you will not be able to make another RAID using Windows. Because you did the RAID on a level of Windows don't control hardware and looks like it, it's just a disk. If the fault tolerance that you are looking for is actually already in place.

    Because it is a hardware raid and not controlled by Windows software RAID, you will not be able to change all of the portions of the mirror and must perform these actions at the level of the BIOS/hardware. If you want to use Windows to control your RAID array you need to format both drives, break the hardware mirror. This will allow Windows to detect this than 2 hard drives. From there, you can go to disk management, convert dynamic disks, and then create your mirror.

    I hope this helps. Shawn - Support Engineer - MCP, MCDST
    Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think

  • OptiPlex 7020 and RAID array

    Greetings.

    I bought an Optiplex 7020 and controller card SATA referenced in this post after you speak with a representative and come far from believing the 7020 and the SATA controller card combination would allow me to set up a RAID 1 array. I bought both the 7020 and the controller Dell card.

    However, after several conversations with the Dell and Technical Support Technical Support Startech, I'm still not able to get this working. I am able to enter in the configuration menu of controller card at startup in addition to being able to access the system BIOS. The BIOS shows 'Mass Storage' assigned to the PCI Express slot (as it should), but complains without hard drive being found when I try to start.

    Just for clarity: I'm not trying to use a built-in RAID configuration and try instead to use a controller card to take care of the RAID array. So I am (perhaps erroneous) belief that the 'RAID ON' in the BIOS setting is unimportant because the controller card takes care of the RAID array. BTW: My BIOS is not a parameter "RAID ON". I say just that to prevent an answering machine to take me on the way to the RAID configuration integrated. The 7020 does not come with built-in RAID.

    In fact, this Dell page said I need to "buy additional hardware", which is exactly what I did when I bought the controller card - or at least I thought.

    So the questions are: what should I do to be able to get my Optiplex 7020 to mirror the first drive on a second so that the second is bootable immediately in case one breaks down?  Do I need a software solution instead? Do I need extra hardware yet?

    Thanks in advance!

    If this card requires a driver, so it is probably not responsible until Windows loads BIOS will not be able to see the drives connected on this card to boot from one of them.

    And according to the Manual, the startup options are:

    To specify the order in which the computer attempts to find an operating system. The options are:

    1. Floppy drive
    2. WDC WD2500AAKX-75U6AA0
    3. USB storage device
    4. CD/DVD/CD-RW drive
    5. Integrated NETWORK interface

    Therefore, there is no option to say BIOS to get a boot on PCI - e drive.

    That said, it is made reference to the Intel RAID controller in the manual, which suggests it could work with this system.

    Win 8/8.1 and win 10, there is a built-in utility called "storage space" to create a mirror. Two drives must be connected to the SATA ports on the motherboard and probably identical in size. So give that a try...

  • Data store missing after the reconstruction of the raid array

    One of the players in my raid array has failed a few days ago.

    I had a spare drive in the table so the controller immediately began the process of rebuilding and all servers were running throughout.

    When the reconstruction has been completed (I checked this via the user interface of raid array and the newspaper), I had to stop the server to remove disc defective (not replaceable chassis hot) and when I restarted the server, the data on the raid array store isn't there anymore.  I also checked through the raid controller interface that I removed the (defective) drive and that the table was always in a ready state when he came.

    In vsphere client, when I click on the storage... Add link, the server sees the material but if I click then it tells me that it will be re - format the volume.  See attachment.  I have most certainly does not take the next step and reformat.  Simply, I took the screenshot and regularized.

    I found these instructions, but they are for an older version of ESXi and am unsure if they are correct for ESXi 6.0.0 338124

    VMware KB: Lack of data store after the reconstruction of the RAID disk/LUN

    Here are the steps I should follow?

    If these aren't the right instructions can you tell me the version which is for ESXi 6.0.0 338124 that I couldn't find anything either.

    Thank you

    Hi ThompsG,

    Yes, there are two data stores for the virtual machine located on the RAID array.  The virtual machine itself was stored in a different data store that was not in the raid array.

    I spent about 48 hours last week, including this morning, trying to coax ESXi recognizing volumes, with no luck.  Finally, I gave up and I removed the virtual computer hard drives that were on the corrupt data store.  Then the virtual machine came without problem.

    Finally, since I have everything on these 2 volumes backed up to a cloud provider, I have recreated the two data stores in the raid array and began the restoration process. It is currently running and has about 16 days left to go.

  • After a failed raid array recovery my data store is missing

    Hi all

    I'm under ESXi at home, but I have a problem with that I need help

    First of all, let me start with the specs:

    ESXI: 5.1.0,799733

    RAID Controller: Adaptec 6805 (driver of the community with the support)

    Configuration of RAID: RAID 5 12,71 TB of disk

    I had some problems with my RAID controller which I solved it using the Adaptec article: a table failed can be recovered? I ended up drop the table and re-create it.

    The RAID array is now in OPTIMUM condition, so I started ESXi and connected using vSphere to find all my virtual machines as unknown (Inaccessible).

    I started googling and found some information, but nothing so far to solve this problem.

    I tried info from these links:

    - Problems after RAID5 which are now resolved, I am not able to mount VMFS

    - VMware KB: Re-create a missing partition of VMFS datastore in VMware vSphere 5.0/5.1/5.5

    ~ # df k

    1 k-blocks used available use % mounted on file system

    VMFS-5 483131392 319600640 163530752 /vmfs/volumes/500 GB 66%

    vfat 4192960 141952 4051008 3% / vmfs/volumes/51f45583-c7047877-9ff7-0015178fcc59

    vfat 255716 138872 116844 54% / vmfs/volumes/55f80475-edb62e49-366c-1f1975e107c2

    vfat 255716 135420 120296 53% / vmfs/volumes/8367f77f-57cb0e3e - 888-b-046f29890a95

    vfat 292688 206792 85896 71% / vmfs/volumes/51f4556a-e6c74124 - 5A 63-0015178fcc59

    ~ # fdisk-l

    ***

    The fdisk command is deprecated: fdisk does not support GPT partitions.  Thank you for using partedUtil

    ***

    Disk/dev/disks/t10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000: 500,1 GB, 500107862016 bytes

    255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders

    Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

    Device boot start end blocks Id system

    / dev/Disks/T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000p1 1 115 917504 5 extended

    Partition 1 does not stop the limit of cylinder

    / dev/Disks/T10. 115 637 4193280 6 FAT16 ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000p2

    Partition 2 will not stop the limit of cylinder

    / dev/Disks/T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000p3 637 60802 483271704 fb VMFS

    / dev/Disks/T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000p4 * 1 1 4080 4 FAT16 < 32M

    Partition 4 does not stop the limit of cylinder

    / dev/Disks/T10. 1 33 255984 6 FAT16 ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000p5

    / dev/Disks/T10. 33 65 255984 6 FAT16 ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000p6

    / dev/Disks/T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000p7 65 79 112624 VMKcore fc

    / dev/Disks/T10. 79 115 292848 6 FAT16 ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000p8

    Partition table entries are not in the order of disc

    Fdisk: device has more than 2 ^ 32 sectors, each of them is unusable

    Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT

    Disk /dev/disks/mpx.vmhba1:C0:T0:L0: 4294967295 sectors, 4095 M

    Logical sector size: 512

    Identifier (GUID) of disc: 0652d5d8-10f3-4264-9d35-1e12b2d23b76

    Partition table contains up to 128 entries

    First usable sector is 34, last usable area is 27304898526

    Starting number (sector) end (sector), Code name of size

    1 2048 27304898526 25.4 G 0700

    ~ # esxcfg - volume - l

    < no results >

    # ls/vmfs/devices/drives.

    MPX.vmhba1:C0:t0:l0 vml.0100000000343130313131435043353336363200000000000053414d53554e

    MPX.vmhba1:C0:t0:l0:1 vml.0100000000343130313131435043353336363200000000000053414d53554e:1

    T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000 vml.0100000000343130313131435043353336363200000000000053414d53554e:2

    T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000:1 vml.0100000000343130313131435043353336363200000000000053414d53554e:3

    T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000:2 vml.0100000000343130313131435043353336363200000000000053414d53554e:4

    T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000:3 vml.0100000000343130313131435043353336363200000000000053414d53554e:5

    T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000:4 vml.0100000000343130313131435043353336363200000000000053414d53554e:6

    T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000:5 vml.0100000000343130313131435043353336363200000000000053414d53554e:7

    T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000:6 vml.0100000000343130313131435043353336363200000000000053414d53554e:8

    T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000:7 vml.01000000003630356634396164524149443520

    T10. ATA___SAMSUNG_HD501LJ___410111CPC53662000000000000:8 vml.01000000003630356634396164524149443520:1

    # partedUtil getptbl /vmfs/devices/disks/mpx.vmhba1:C0:T0:L0

    TPG

    1699651 255 63 27304898560

    1 2048 27304898526 AA31E02A400F11DB9590000C2911D1B8 vmfs 0

    [EDIT] I have not noticed before that the mpx.vmhba had an additional entry in/vmfs/devices/disks

    # partedUtil getptbl /vmfs/devices/disks/mpx.vmhba1:C0:T0:L0:1

    unknown

    1699651 255 63 27304896479

    I have attached vmkernel.log

    I hope someone can point me in the right direction, I have a backup of my criticism/personal data, but it would be nice to recover the rest as well...

    Thanks in advance for the help!

    Post edited by: Sebastiaan Grob adding info on /vmfs/devices/disks/mpx.vmhba1:C0:T0:L0:1

    Running orders more:

    ~ # esxcli instant vmfs storage list

    51f4625a-6482a0da-c112-0015178fcc59

    Volume name: Adaptec RAID 1

    VMFS UUID: 51f4625a-6482a0da-c112-0015178fcc59

    Can mount: true

    Reason of mountability-United Nations:

    Can will: true

    Reason for non-resignaturability:

    County of measure pending: 1

    Then I tried add the option of storage as described in the present (KB VMware: vSphere management LUNS identified as LUN snapshot ) KB article and my data store is back, no loss!

  • Restore virtual machines after building the new RAID array

    Hi all

    I am new to the virtual machines, so I'm sorry for the newbie question. Currently, I have a HP ML350 G6 ESXi 5.0.0 running on 4 GB Flash hosting SD cards two virtual machines and licenses for 5 Essentials vSphere and vCenter Server 5 Essentials. I also have a RAID5 configuration with drives SAS 146 GB (6). I intend to remove all six readers and their replacement by 300 GB disks and build a RAID6 array. My question is, what would be the best practice to move the two VMS in the current RAID array to the new RAID array? Wouldn't be also simple to make backups of virtual machines or clones, exchanging the readers, the new array of construction and restoring virtual machines? If someone could point me in the right direction would be great!

    Thank you all!

    Personally, I would go with backup & restore. In addition, use the downtime to upgrade the firmware of the host (HP published recently a few critical fixes on the RAID controller and some models of HARD drive).

    What I would do - to avoid any problem - is to remove the host ESXi, vCenter, replace disks, update the firmware, re - install ESXi and as final step add the host to vCenter again.

    André

  • Install ESXi cannot see the RAID array

    I tried to install ESXi 5.1 on a HP Proliant Dl160 G6, with 4 hard drives of 2 TB in RAID 1 + 0 array, using a HP b110i controller. When it comes time to select the installation media ESXi to, the installer sees the 4 physical disks, rather than the logical disk that I created with the controller.

    The b110i is a RAID controller-based software that does not support the ESXi.  As you have noticed it will not recognize the individual disks and it work perfectly with them as individual disks.  But if you are looking for a RAID array, you need to add another RAID controller.

  • I would like to migrate from Aperture. What happens to my masters that are on a RAID array and then what should I do with my safe which is located on a separate drive please?

    I'm sorry, but I'm loud understand what happening to my master original RAW files, I keep offline on a RAID array and then what I do with my safe that, like all my photos modified? Sorry for this simple question, but would someone help please my lift the fog?

    Thank you

    Rob

    One of the major downfalls of Aperture is that it shows you where are your pictures. They always favored it as a feature (even as a ' new paradigm'), but it's not so wonderful when you need to do something about Apple never intended. Then, it sounds really like it led to you not knowing where your files or files that correspond to which elements of the UI opening. I suggest that you need to nail for yourself - images from Aperture to right click and choose Show in Finder, until you know where everything is.

    Otherwise, make sure you have plenty of available disk space, stop asking questions and just see what happens when you run plugin import LR with the options I suggested. It won't damage the opening.

  • Undetected RAID array

    I use a HP DL180 G5 equipped of an E200 HP controller.

    I built two RAID arrays using the E200 controller

    1 65 GB hard drive

    4 HDDs of 750 GB in RAID 5

    I was able to successfully install ESXi 4.1 and everything seems to work without problems.  Except that I am unable to see the matrix RAID 2 to.  I am able to see the 1 65 GB drive, because that's where ESXi is installed.  But I can't seem to find the matrix RAID 2 to anywhere.

    I tried to do a new analysis of all storage cards, but it is not always see it.  I tried to rebuild RAID 5, but it is not always see it.

    When you run fdisk-l on the tech support console it does not show the RAID 5 array anywhere. I also ran lspci and it does not detect the Smart Array E200 mass storage, but it does not detect the RAID array.  DF not to see no more.

    I don't know where to go from here.

    What are the troubleshooting steps I can go through to find the missing RAID array?  I'm assuming that they will have to be performed from the CLI.

    I have not tried to install 4 independent labels still to see if we can see them or not.  I'm sure that the disks are always good as I was running this server as a target iSCSI using Solaris 10 until a few weeks before.

    Welcome to the community,

    ESX has a limitation for the disk/LUN 2 TB sizes less than 512 bytes. Assuming that you are running the latest firmware on the E200 and the upgrade of cache installed (required for RAID5) I recommend you remove the 65GB disk and create a RAID5 with 4 x 750GB disks. Since the RAID 5 create 3 logical volumes, for ESXi and 2 x 10 GB ~ 1 TB for VMFS data storage. You need to do this, use the ACU on the SmartStart CD utility.

    See http://bizsupport1.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00688683/c00688683.pdf for more details E200

    André

  • What is the best way to always increment at index 0 only for an array of multiple elements?

    The principle is to complete a worksheet of left right in the same line but the increment of the column letter only (IE - B4 and C4 etc.). Herewith, I adapted an existing example VI that works for an array of 2 elements (ie - B4) but does not work for a 3-element array (ie - B40, B50 becomes). Keeping simple, what is the best way easier to modify my existing code to always check that the size of the table and the index automatically return to 0 to correctly increment the first letter only (IE - B) and not the number (IE - 4)?

    Thank you!

    Barry

    Instead of 'index automatically to zero', why not just make a zero instead of the size of table manipulation-1-1?

    Of course it will all fall apart once you get to column Z.

    Also look into the Board of Excel.   Do not post question.  This is just a link to the other discussions related to Excel.  Some of them might give you ideas how to manipulate your cell references.

  • How do the function of table 1 d search case-insensitive for the array of strings

    How do the function of table 1 d search case-insensitive for the array of strings

    Hi Karine,.

    convert the two (table and search for the string) to lowercase before using this feature...

  • Raid array configured on PowerVault 220 s

    Please help, I can build on my s 220 PowerVault Raid array if I don't have management software? Data storage connect to the Dell PowerEdge 4600 Server but drives raid hard configuration utility can set up one server.


  • Advice on which drive hard buy for Raid

    I'm going to buy http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136544 8 these hard drives, and I'll use a http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816131004 raid controller to implement RAID 3. Western Digital know that these drives are not suitable for the raid, disk only I can find, is a http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136797. I was wondering if there is a difference actaul between these two that makes the difference. Also, I was wondering if anyone of you knows another hard drive that would be good for the raid which is less than $ 100.

    Your choice of reader and the controller look good for me.

    I have used a controller Areca with WD black for the past two years, and as long as you do not have a form any backup other than redundancy RAID 5 on your PC, you should be OK with the readers of 'consumer' (aka black WD, Hitachi sister, etc.) as opposed to "enterprise" drives for RAID (AKA WE RE3 RE4, Hitachi Ultrastar etc) systems.

    Records of the company are:

    -usually best parts - possibly some companies choose the best boards with defects less for their dearest readers

    -Sometimes a few features that help with vibrations caused by multiple drives in a PC working in tandem

    -almost always a feature that will keep the drive of the company to continue to try to correct any error while reading or writing beyond a certain number of seconds. WD calles this TLER (time limited error recovery);

    I've seen individuals suggesting that setting the spin-up time is increased from the default.7 seconds up to 1 second when you use consumer readers to help prevent consumer drives marked as bad. I did this and I have never had a car abandoned in two years.

    I have about 50% business (RE3 1 TB WD) and about 50% of consumer records (Black 1 TB 32 MB cache) that are very similar, with the exception of the firmware. In two years, I had a bad drive; No data has been lost, performance just the RAID and even that was pretty subtle. And by the way, it was one of the RE3 drives aren't infected, one of consumer readers! When I started with the WD drives, it was possible to download a software and to set the time on consumer drives TLER and gain many of the benefits models company without having to pay for more expensive readers. Then, a year ago WD changed their line WD Black to defeat this utility (it was a utility WD TLER!) to work with their readers of consumers; Yes, their were some upset users on this one!

    Jim

Maybe you are looking for

  • Iphone7 and questions of Verizon's LTE

    I've recently upgraded to Iphone7 128 GB with Verizon. I am constantly having problems with LTE. My phone drops to 3 grams, or 1 x in areas that my partners (Iphone6s) phone still works like for LTE. I was restarting my phone or turning data cell pow

  • Another version of Firefox on two PCs.

    I have a pc and a laptop, both running Windows 7 Home Premium, and the two version of Firefox 14.1NL. When I check the version of my pc via "about" I see: 14.0.1. In my laptop, exactly as shown on the screen: Firefox14.0.1Funnelcake Jul 2012mozilla14

  • Music white App

    After the upgrade of my iPhone iOS 9.2 6s (and yesterday to 9.3), my music App is just a white screen.  I don't get access to the stored music.  In the configuration, the only options I can find is to join Apple Music, which is not of interest to me.

  • PS_App could not be found in foglight monitor agent areas

    Hi all We have configured the monitor agent PS App for Peoplesoft-Windows machine monitoring. We gave the home path and the path of smoking in the properties of the Agent and the cartridge is 5.6.2.1 we use. the agent is unable to find the areas for

  • What to learn how to create a 'ghost image' when hovering over a picture

    Can I make photographs of product for e-commerce with the PS?