Image size vs image quality/compression ratio Powershot A3000

Picked up this camera on Ebay because I read good reviews, but for the life of me I can't get a resolution of more than 180 dpi, if I followed the instructions given in the manual of setting manually in P mode for the size or quality. If I want to print something, it must be at least 300 dpi. I want that my images have enough pixels for a beautiful impression. Is there something that I don't see? This unit still has the ability to do this? Thanks for any input.

Unless you want to print using Photoshop to make it IGNORE the IPR news. Turn on your RULE to see what size PHOTOSHOP says he will be at 180 DPI. I'd be willing to bet that this will be much bigger than expected.  Not resample upward or down from your original file, which is not necessary. Set your camera to film in large fine jpg & check the width of size & pixel file & height to check that they match the camera speccs.

Tags: Canon Camera

Similar Questions

  • Who has the highest image quality?

    I'm working on a huge project, analysis of the thousands of books, documents and files that I have collected over the years in the form of PDF files. I use a scanner high speed when possible, using a dish only for items that cannot be digitized with a scanner high speed (large size files and folders in several pages for example). My plan is to digitize everything as quickly as possible, so I can have a digital copy safely stored in my computer and some external hard drives. This is probably what I need to do for only text files, which I can throw then (the copy of the paper, that is).

    However, I want to make a new image analysis (and perhaps some elements of text) at a higher resolution on my scanner so I can have copies of higher quality. Then I'll try to figure out the best resolution and what file type to save as. I use a scanner Epson Perfection V33. Am I right in thinking that quality would be offered by a .tiff file, followed by a .jpg with a .pdf file file lower quality?

    The quality of most of my material is not extraordinary, and I probably won't be much as TIFF, scanner due to the huge file size. So I think that the best option for images (and the text that I might want to scan as an image) is jpg. Is there any particular optimal resolutions that you would recommend?

    Thank you.

    "Image quality" in a document PDF is created by the image quality of the image that is presented in the PDF document.

    A PDF file can and often there are a lot of images with each having a different image resolution.

    If you have content text on paper and that you want to scan it, go to TIFF and then create a PDF of TIFF.

    This optimises the accuracy of OCR recognition.

    JPEG production involves typically "ugly" compression (compression by destructive removal of content) - not too goof to images of text that you want to pass by OCR.

    Analysis of the text to TIFF - 300 dpi will suffice in most situations. Avoid JPEG compression.

    Be well...

  • Image quality on responsive project CP8

    Has anyone met image quality fell when a sensitive to the CP8 project publishing?

    I currently have a little. I need to use transparently and on different screen sizes that they resize as you would expect ic? NES PNG.

    But the quality really falls on iOS (iPhone 5) while when showing your desktop they look very good.

    Even seen when the image size is fixed correct pixels the. PNG always looks pixelated on the iPhone.

    I tried to change the quality settings but nothing works, my first thought was network compression is more 4 g / 3G, but it's the same on the WiFi.

    I hope I'm missing something obvious?

    Find this image file in output files and see if CP it can be compressed.

  • Toshiba Camileo Pro HD - bad image quality camcorder

    I recently bought a toshiba camileo pro hd camcorder due to its size and 720 hd quality.

    I connected through my wlt toshiba tv via the component cable, but the picture quality is bad. It seems very grainy. I thought it was the connection, but these have been checked and were perfect.

    IM pretty impressed if this is how it will run even if it was valuable.

    I'm doing something wrong?

    Cheers for all the advice

    Hello

    If you image quality is bad check details in the menu setting by choosing the right standard of TV (try PAL and NTSC as an alternative).

    And if the LCD screen image is unclear when shooting, try to turn the ring to 'Focus' on the circumference of the lens on the proper position: (general/Figure/Macro)

    Good bye

  • The flattening (or economy without diapers) compromises image QUALITY?

    I'm save a large .tiff with multilayered image, but do not need to access the different layers, so my question is simple, if I can save the image without layers in order to reduce the size, or which would also reduce the image QUALITY?

    Long as you save it as a TIFF, PSD, PSB or PDF, also there is no loss of quality.

    It's perfectly fine in principle, if you are absolutely certain "have really no need to access the different layers later.

    If you have vector layers or text that you need to print, it is much better not to flatten the image like that rasterizes all layers.

    Just stay far, far away from JPEG files, which are deteriorating in quality whenever you save or resave them.

  • Adobe Muse image quality full screen slide show

    Hello

    I have a question. What if I add an image to my slide show the quality of the Muse in my browser or adobe is worse than the size of naturally occurring? My image is big enough x 3400 and when it is exported to muse I see pixels and blur effect etc. Is it possible to do not resample an image quality in muse is an option to stay with the original quality?

    Hello

    Slideshow fullscreen is currently implemented Muse is resampling images of hero to the size they are in Design mode. For most of the cases that work very well, but there is no easy way to force an image of higher resolution than the output. The only solution that comes to mind would be to replace the image after publish/download/export.

    I hope this helps.

    Kind regards

    Aish

  • low image quality

    Why the quality of the image is so low that "Lossless" is selected in the settings?

    I used the image you provided and published three versions of it through presenter 8.0.1.

    The parameter without loss of image quality produced the worst result.

    http://realeyesconnect.adobeconnect.com/p6ur1ich3eq/

    The high quality setting produces the most beautiful version of the image (and the file more large size enough curiously).

    http://realeyesconnect.adobeconnect.com/p6bly926qu0/

    The medium quality setting produces an image that seemed acceptable, but noticibly less in quality at high speed.

    http://realeyesconnect.adobeconnect.com/p1t9fyfx3fi/

    I would use the high quality setting as this seems to yield the best results for this image.

  • Image quality in flash

    When you load an online image - the image is skewed or stretched and its quality is bad. The image type is gif because we need transparency. Pls help for a better image quality in spite of changing its size.

    import flash.display. *;
    function loadBitmapSmoothed (url: String, target: MovieClip) {}
    var bmc:MovieClip = target.createEmptyMovieClip ("bmc", target.getNextHighestDepth ());
    var listener: Object = new Object();
    Listener.TMC = target;
    listener.onLoadInit = {function (mc:MovieClip)}
    MC._visible = false;
    var bitmap: BitmapData = new BitmapData (mc._width - mc._height, 50-50, true, 0x000000);
    this.tmc.attachBitmap (bitmap, this.tmc.getNextHighestDepth (), "auto", true);
    bitmap. Draw (MC);
    };
    var loader: MovieClipLoader = new MovieClipLoader();
    loader.addListener (listener);
    loader.loadClip (url, bmc);
    }
    translate;
    createEmptyMovieClip ("myMC", getNextHighestDepth());
    loadBitmapSmoothed ("one.gif", myMC);
    Stop();

    In the code above, if I reduce the width and height of the image is cut into pieces
    :(

  • The image quality of MacBook Air vs Pro

    Hello

    I just bought a MacBook Air 13 "and I got a MacBook Pro 13" (non-retine) till now.
    If I compare the image quality between Air and Pro there is a difference of contrast and sharpness of the colors. The monitors setting is the same on both Macs, the Air is even supposed to have high resolution (1440 x 900 instead of 1280 x 800, the MacBook Pro). Graphics card is Intel HD Graphics 6000 1536 MB vs 4000 in my MacBook Pro.

    Anyone know if there is a difference in both computers display technology, or if this could be a problem in my Macbook Air?

    THX in advance and best regards

    Products and specifications:

    MacBook Air (13 ", Anfang 2015)

    Intel Core i7 2.2 GHz

    8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3

    Intel HD Graphics 6000 1536 MB

    LCD display is different between Pro and Air. Don't know which group is better.

  • S70 satellite image quality - A - 11 H web camera is not good

    Hello

    Running windows 8.1 which came with the laptop.
    New out of the box.

    According to the title.

    I find the quality of the image of the camera very grainy color image, poor etc.

    When I start the webcam using the search bar on the right, he begins using the Microsoft application, when you access all the parameters that is available under settings/options is Photo image format, the grid lines, the location information.

    I've been in touch with Toshiba support who advised to do a refresh of laptop, I did.
    It made no difference.

    After which they asked me to find the Toshiba web camera application on your laptop, it should have been in the Program Files folder in the folder of Toshiba.
    This application does not exist on my laptop.

    Technology verified the same laptop model, that he was available, he said when he selected the webcam, he opened using Web of Toshiba, Microsoft no camera app.

    I looked at the other portable Toshiba with web cameras and found the picture quality to be better. Unable to get to settings and these computers portable on-screen and in demo mode, so locked up to a certain extent.

    I can't believe a web camera in this day and age for this value of laptop to have this bad image quality. My digital camera of 10 years ago has a better picture quality.

    I checked through the laptop, and I don't have this app installed.

    I have checked for software and drivers updated to my laptop and cannot find this application applies to my laptop. Etc drivers seem to be up to date.

    I would like to know, other users of this series S have any camera image quality problem.
    What application is used when the camera is selected, Toshiba or Microsoft.

    Is Toshiba web camera application for Windows 8.1, that I don't see not listed for 8.1
    This sounds like a hardware failure or a problem with the application/software.

    Any guidance or help on this would be appreciated, because I came to a point of the return of this laptop for a refund.

    Thanks in advance.

    D.

    Yes, I tried using FORCE!

    > Technology checked the same laptop model, that he was available, he said when he selected the webcam, he opened using Web of Toshiba, Microsoft no camera app.

    Toshiba webcam app is available for the system Win 7 but win it 8 and 8.1 of Windows system use the webcam from Microsoft to the own address application.

    > I looked at the other portable Toshiba with web cameras and found the picture quality to be better.
    Different Toshiba laptops are equipped with different webcams.
    Satellite S70 - A - 11 H was fitted with a * 0.92 mega pixel webcam *.

    For example a Satellite A660 was equipped with a mega pixel webcam_ _1.3M

    There is therefore a difference of resolution of the webcam

  • Satellite L755D - Webcam: very bad image quality?

    Hello @all,

    I have a SAT. 755 (OS: win7 64 bit). The webcam returns a very bad image quality and I noticed that the driver is from the year 2006 (Microsoft, Version 6.1.760.17514).

    I installied the last 'pilot' vom site of Toshiba (version 2.0.0.19), which actually just updated the CAM software.

    It is a fact, that this webcam is of very poor quality, or could someone please help me improve the photos, which are not only in poor Skype, but also when I just test the cam.

    Greetings from the Austria
    erkg1959

    Hello

    Please check the film in front of the lens is detached.
    I think that many models is delivered with a protective film in front of the goal and it is not too easy to do.

    See you soon!

    Tom

  • IdeaPad Yoga 13 - HDMI of bad image quality on the TV 1080 p screen?

    Hi people, I have recently connected my Yoga via HDMI to my TV Samsung 40 ". Unfortunately, the image quality does not as good as my old T61 via VGA hooked up to my TV. Image via HDMI on my TV has some sort of "shadows" around the edges at all. I use a HDMI Basics Amazon cable that is capable of 3D and Ethernet over HDMI - I think this cable should be ok.

    Did it someone else faced with problems with the picture quality of the Yoga on a TV via HDMI before?

    Just for completeness: it was my TV sharpness settings. I had to turn off completely disable the artifacts.

  • Bad PCI-1405 image quality

    I just got a fg PCI-1405 to replicate an old Imaging System. I use a Sony XC - ST50 (PAL) monochrome camera.

    The image quality is poor. He has a blurry pixelated, look to it. I remember that the last time I bought the fg of low-end of NOR, I had a similar problem and had to switch to the Commission more expensive which worked very well. I find it had to believe that NEITHER would sell a POS, so what am I doing wrong? Is there some sort of configuration that I'm missing?

    Note: I have the camera set up like a PAL camera standard.

    Thank you!

    It is a device of XC-ST50CE. However, I was playing around with some parameters. This combination gave me good results:

    Luma - full bandwidth

    Luma comb - disabled

    Trap of Chroma - off

    Luma peaked - disabled

    Bandwidth of Chroma - high (probably any)

    Comb of Chroma - off (probably any)

    Treatment of Chroma - always off (probably any)

  • The image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs... The 5Dmark3?

    I use Leica lenses on a canon with an adapter body.  Is the image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs.the 5Dmark3 similar?  A reason to get one against the other?  I like the idea that I can change the viewfinder on the Mk 2 screens. Any overwhelming improvement in the 5Dmark 3 that would justify the review?  Thanks to those who have used the two boxes.

    The main advantage of a Mk3 on the Mk2 is the AF.  Most points and it can focus with f/8.   If your Leica lens is manual focus, then you would not care to this topic.  3 5 has a bit of an advantage in the ISO but not a huge factor.  Another one, I'd say that IQ is the same.

  • C720 image quality

    Hello

    I bought a new acer chromebook C720. Everythings are perfect, except the image quality. Photos either on Youtube or resemble other pages on photo of day old negative (sepia). He did the chromebook useless for me. Can someone help me find the solution. Is that the question of parameters or the problem is the machine/operating system.

    Thank you

    Valerie

    I found the problem. I had checked for high contrast. Once I unchecked, all right. I found the Acer excellent C720 chromebook.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Store the Spanish: Star Wars in English

    A few comments. I am British and live in Spain. I suffer by your Spanish store with her Spanish dubbed movies that sometimes are not available in their original language. Despite the fact that you're the best option I have, the Microsoft store and Go

  • Satellite 2410-303 does not illuminate

    Hello We have a system here on the bench with the following problem: -system does not light-with the inserted battery power LED keeps blinking yellow-connected to the network of continuous flashing yellow LED power-no fan or turns HARD drive noise-ot

  • Windows 7 - updates are ready to install for hours

    Windows update says preparation to installation, its been said that for more than 4 hours, I only want to install an update, no idea why its taking so long? Thanks vince

  • BlackBerry phone passport number non-active links in the emails

    The blue highlight phone # s in an e-mail message are not active as a hyperlink; more annoying, is not available in the OS 10?  My 9900 if she had Thank you

  • PIX 515ER spending 6.3 (4) 6.3 (5) and PDM

    Hi all I'm looking for documentation on upgrading a v6.3 (4) PIX515ER to v6.3 (5) and 3.0 (2) v PDM to PDM v3.0 (4) but cannot find them anywhere. Can you please help. Additional advice on the upgrade process is greatly appreciated.