Instruments GPIB remote access through the GPIBConf device names

Hello

I am trying to run the Labwindows 2009 SP1 code on a PC based office while trying to exploit the GPIB instruments

on another part of the network.

Normally, this isn't problem with VISA server on the target computer and the use of names of Alias VISA within the

Office PC code.

But this code was inherited and uses a different method which has been the best over time.

The code uses device name strings that have been defined using the GPIB utility: GpibConfig.exe,.

on the target computer. So when a device is first initialized, the name defined in the GPIB utility is used

by the code and the associate instrument access are reached. It works fine when the code and

the instruments are located on the same PC.

My question: is there some way I can use VISA access server remote GPIB instruments help

defined names on the computer target with the GpibConfig.exe utility?

Thank you

Gary.

The low-level GPIB functions have no knowledge functions VISA or aliases. This must be a very old application since the VISA has been around for 10 years. Have you always the source code so you can change your GPIB for VISA?

Tags: NI Hardware

Similar Questions

  • AppPortal error: remote access to the server is not enabled

    I'm lost on this one.

    Using the full client of AppPortal on a Win7 64 bit machine (version 8.0 of the customer)

    Double-click the icon, download authenticated - published applications show, then double click a published application, the end user receives:

    Remote access to the server is not enabled.

    This happens only on a single computer

    From this profile of users on the given computer I can MSTSC on the same server without problem

    The error also follows the profiles on the given computer.

    I have closed the Antivirus and Windows Firewall and still can not get this to work.

    Even uninstalled and reinstalled the client.

    From my computer, I can easily log in as this user.

    Customers get automatically configured through an XML file.

    After installation, I tested this laptop and he always gave the same error.

    I ended up him to give me the phone for a few hours.

    Uninstalled the version that was there (build 8.0.0.forget) and scoured the Windows Explorer for all left overs (a little here and there in user profiles and delete).

    Then scoured the registry for expressions; vWorkspace, Quest Software and Provision Networks and remove all instances

    Reinstalled all THE SUCCESS with the new connector to our servers (8.0.306.1427)

    Thanks for the help Dave

  • Sharing of readers do not reconnect - error "an error occurred during connection [drive letter]: [share name] Microsoft Windows network: the local device name is already in use." This connection has not been restored. »

    Original title: Shared readers do not reconnect

    I have two PCs connected wireless. A laptop (Vista Business) was the drives mapped to actions on the other PC (XP). Whenever the Vista PC is started or out of hibernation, or after only a short period of time these discs are not available. Click on the drive in Explorer to display the message "an error occurred during connection [drive letter]: [share name] Microsoft Windows network: the local device name is already in use." This connection has not been restored. »

    If I click on 'Network' within Solution Explorer, the XP PC is not visible. The only way that I can "reconnect" these disks is to go into my anti-virus (Trend) and open the network map. This shows the XP PC and then the shares are available through Explorer - XP PC is still not visible by clicking network however.

    It started only happens in the last two months - cannot locate exactly when, but quite recently. I use connections to store small files and backup critical files a few before nailing the laptop away and it is quite annoying to have to go through this routine every time.

    Any ideas?

    Just in case it helps others - I found that if I make sure that my XP PC has a fixed IP address, and then set up the shares so that they are defined using the IP address and not share names, then I do have more problems - seems like it's something to do with Windows solve the share names rather than something to do with the personal firewall after all.

  • Impossible to rename a folder in COM error "the specified device name is invalid.

    Original title: A picturesque problem!

    Hi dear friends
    I came across a picturesque problem, someone at - it also have problems? : D

    http://seorooz.IR/WP-content/uploads/2014/06/capture.PNG

    Hello

    Thank you for writing to Microsoft Community Forum.

    The error "the specified device name is invalid" is displayed if you try to name a folder with a name that represents a limit of MS-DOS device name.

    The MS-DOS device driver names cannot be used as file names in Windows. As a result, we cannot name as records con, zero, etc.

    Microsoft MS-DOS booked these names for these system device drivers.

    • CON: Keyboard and display
    • PRN: System list device, usually a parallel port
    • To THE: auxiliary device, usually a serial port
    • CLOCK$: the system real-time clock
    • DRAW: Bit-Bucket device
    • A:-Z:: the drive letters
    • COM1: First communications port series
    • LPT1: First parallel printer port
    • LPT2: Second parallel printer port
    • LPT3: The third parallel printer port
    • COM2: Second communication port series
    • COM3: Third serial communications Port
    • COM4: Fourth serial communications Port

    For more information, you can also consult:

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/74496/en-us

    Hope the helps of information provided. Let us know in case you need any help/information to windows.

  • Static IP remote access for the media center

    I NMH410 work through a WRT610N router.   My ports are configured for static IP access.  Seems to just going through www.ciscomediahub.com does not work well for me.

    Can someone provide the 'exact' URL I would enter in order to access my media center?

    Documentation of assistance through Cisco shows: https://Wan_IP_Address but that doesn't seem to work.  The demand is just there and finally once outside.

    To everyone:

    Apparently, I discovered and corrected the problem that I had with 'Remote access' to my Media Hub.

    Somehow, there are two configurations of router that had to be done.  On two port forwarding configurations has been necessary and once allowed me to access the media center.

    It seems that my ISP has a 192.168.x.x address router that was different from the address of my router 192.168.x.x.  It is on the home router when I incoming and make changes to the information of port forwarding.  The fact that I was getting an error message indicating that I wasn't even reached my router alerted me to the fact that my ISP was blocking remote access.  In the end, that's where my problem was discovered.

    Translate:

    If you have problems to access your media "at a distance" pole through its IP address (and not by the cisco media center), make sure that you configure the ports of the router specified by your Internet provider address, as well as the ports of the router that you have on your network home.

    I have forwarded port 443 on the two addresses of router port, and I can now access my media hub remotely.  Now if I can't play videos remotely, I'll be set.  This leads to another problem that I'll send it in another thread.

    Thanks for the help and suggestions of each.

  • Remote access to the site to site VPN

    We currently have a VPN site-to-site set up on a direct line between our two data centers. Hosts on site one can speak to guests at site B, and talk to the hosts to site A to site B guests.

    I've recently implemented a site A. VPN VPN remote access clients can access all of the resources behind the ASA at A site without problem. However, strange things happen when they try to contact the site B.

    I have set up corresponding exemptions of NAT on each side of the connection. The remote site reported no abnormalities. When you attempt to connect to a remote VPN client to site B, the only errors that appear are on the SAA to site A. When a remote client attempts to connect to a host at site B, the following errors appear in the log:

    % ASA-3-305005: no group of translation not found for tcp src outside:10.3.0.1/60851 dst ds3:10.0.1.42/22

    I have the exemption following NAT set up on site A:

    access-list sheep; 3 items

    access-list 1 permit line sheep extended ip 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 (hitcnt = 0)

    allowed to Access-list sheep lengthened 2 ip line 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.3.0.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0)

    allowed to Access-list sheep line 3 extended ip 10.3.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 (hitcnt = 0)

    I work on it for a few days now and hesitate to open a ticket of TAC. I've seen a few similar questions on the forums, but have found zero with a working solution. I tried to follow the technical notes on Cisco's Web site for a configuration similar to, but had no luck.

    Also, I enabled same-security-traffic on intra and inter-interface interface.

    Any help would be appreciated.

    HUB of the ASA, is this your topology? If so try below suggestions.

    Inside 10.1.1.0/16 Net

    Net 172.16.0.0/28 - net through Tunnel L2L 10.0.0.0/16 end DS3

    VPN RA Net 10.3.0.0/24

    To RA to access the L2L tunnel end hosting you will need to exempt sheep rule applied to the ds3 interface.

    based on the journal

    % ASA-3-305005: no group of translation not found for tcp src outside:10.3.0.1/60851 dst ds3:10.0.1.42/22

    Try this

    no scope list ip 10.3.0.0 access test allow 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0

    test the ip 10.0.0.0 allowed extended access list 255.255.0.0 10.3.0.0 255.255.255.0

    test access list 0 Tan (ds3)

    on the end of the tunnel (spoke), to allow the network of RA from the FOCUS of the ASA in the interesting traffic.

    Let us know how it works

    Concerning

  • Lost remote access to the internal network after upgarding PIX to 7.0

    I improved our box of PIX 515E Cisco to release 6.3 7.0 (5) and lost connectivity outside of the internal servers through a VPN connection. Any ideas as to why or how this happened?

    If you use the split tunneling, this is probably the question.

    Is the bug id: CSCeh69389

    This Bug says:

    When you upgrade a PIX 6.x to 7.0, if split tunneling is underway

    used for remote access clients, then the conversion of config

    process will not convert the list of split tunnel command, because

    the ACL of splitting 6.x tunnel was allowed to be of type 'expanded '.

    whereas in 7.0 the ACL must be ' standard '.

    To solve the problem, take the extended ACL and manually convert it to a

    Standard ACL, specifying the networks you want encrypted. Times

    the new ACL is in the config, it must be applied under the

    Group Policy.

    EX:

    SplitTunnel list standard access allowed 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

    internal RemoteAccess group strategy

    Group Policy attributes RemoteAccess

    Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

    value of Split-tunnel-network-list SplitTunnel

  • No remote access to the admin page local account mynetgear

    I used happily log into my RN10200 remote and access to everything, including the local administration page. Who has been using ReadyCloud, i.e. before the access of the Web page without hope we get using mynetgear. Page Web tells me that it is no longer accessible on the same network?

    It's pretty useless, because I want to manage my remote NAS box as well!

    I want my access admin back please!

    I would add that I always get very happy fully my ReadyNAS Duo ReadyNAS Remote, even the admin page via. This makes me wonder why I got a downgrade from my accessibility on a new product?

    The images worked and I saw them, they just had not been approved yet (just fixed).

    Have you tried to download the ReadyCLOUD application using a different web browser?

  • Routing and remote access to the Server 2003

    I configured the remote access and routing service in my Server 2003 duly NAT enabled. All my clients are not in the field. All use internet and intranet connection using my proxy authentication provided by the administrator of the proxy server. I would like to restrict the clients except intranet connection. How to limit the customer?

    Post in the Windows Server Forums:
    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer/

  • Remote access via the internet between Windows 7 PCs and a Windows 7 Pro and a Windows PC Vista Home

    I am running Windows 7 Professional on a laptop Dell Studio 1569 (64-bit). I want remote access to one Dell Inspiron, Windows 7 family, but also an another Dell Inspiron running Windows Vista Home edition, via an IP connection over the internet. I can do this and if so, how? I used GoToMeeting.com, but I hope that I can avoid paying their connecting directly. Thanks in advance.

    Take a look at TeamViewer. Boulder computer Maven

  • Allow specific access through the Interfaces ASA 5510

    Hi all

    In my quest to learn Cisco IOS and devices, I need help in smoothing traffic, or access lists, allowing traffic between internal interfaces on the SAA specifically.

    I have an ASA 5510:

    WAN/LAN/DMZ ports labled E0/0 (LAN), E0/1 (WAN), E0/2 (DMZ).

    Connected to the port E0/0 is a 2811 router

    Connected to the port E0/1 is the (external) Internet

    Connected to the port E0/2 is a 2821

    (I'll add a 3745 for VOIP) port E0/3, but it has not yet happened.

    I want to allow traffic between the 2821 and the 2811 routers so that devices on the networks behind them can talk to each other.

    I've specified specific subnets between the ASA and the routers because I want to learn how to shape traffic behind routers, as well as on the ASA. So behind the routers I have different VLANS, but I'm not restrict access between them, still, at least I don't think I am. But as it is, behind the 2821 devices cannot access the DNS / DOMAIN SERVER that is located behind the 2811. Right now I have the routers DHCP power, who works there. Currently devices behind the router 2821-3560 switch cannot access the domain server, primary dns server.

    How can I set the ASA to allow traffic to flow between the two routers and their VLANS?

    Here's the configs of each device and I have also included my switch configs, incase something should be set on them. I only removed the passwords and the parts of the external IP address. I appreciate the help in which States to create and on which devices.

    I think it is best that I put the links to the files of text here.

    Thank you!

    You must remove the following statements on the two routers:
    -# ip nat inside source... overload
    -for each # ip nat inside/outside interface, if they have configured.

    Remove ads rip of the networks that are not directly connected:
    -2821: 172.16.0.0, 192.168.1.0, 199.195.xxx.0
    -2811: 199.195.xxx.0
    -ASA: 128.0.0.0

    No way should be added to the routers, since he is the one by default, put in scene to ASA.

    Check the tables of routing on routers and the ASA.

    On ASA:

    -Remove:
    object-group network # PAT - SOURCE
    # nat (indoor, outdoor) automatic interface after PAT-SOURCE dynamic source

    -create objects of the networks behind the LAN router and enable dynamic NAT:
    network object #.
    subnet
    NAT (inside, outside) dynamic interface

    -review remains NAT rules.

    -to set/adjust the lists access penetration on the interfaces. Do not forget to allow the rip on the LAN and DMZ interfaces.

    -Disable rip on the outside interface.

  • Remote access to the apex applications

    Hi all

    I I find a way to allow access to applications apex of remote machines in my local network. Local access works very well. I need allow users to access their customers-browser web applications by using the URL as http://lugao-pc:8282 / apex. I use Apex 4.1.1 in Oracle 11 g 2, using Embedded PL/SQL gateway

    I've seen other posts that say remote HTTP connection allow the database using DBMS_XDB EXEC. SETLISTENERLOCALACCESS (false); in SQLPlus as SYSDBA. But that doesn't did not help me. I think it is because I use the PL/SQL no Oracle HTTP Server gateway. If am not wrong how do I allow remote access using existing installation?

    Concerning

    Sadik

    Hello

    You must run DBMS_XDB EXEC. SETLISTENERLOCALACCESS (FALSE); If you use Embed PL/SQL gateway.
    If you want to use another HTTP server then it is useless.

    Did you try to turn your firewall server to and see works the connection then?

    Kind regards
    Jari
    -----
    My Blog: http://dbswh.webhop.net/htmldb/f?p=BLOG:HOME:0
    Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jariolai

  • Embedded Web access through the PL/SQL gateway

    Hello

    I'm trying to use the PL/SQL gateway embarked on an application written for 10g XE with APEX 3.2. I can access the application from the computer on which APEX is installed by going to http:// < hostname >: 8080/apex /, but this page does not load on any other computer. I followed all the steps to configure the EPG that I could find in the guide on this forum and installation, and it still does not work.

    Here's what I've done so far:
    (1) run the apex_epg_config.sql script to configure the EPG
    (2) unblocked the anonymous user account (EDIT USER ANONYMOUS ACCOUNT UNLOCK)
    3) updated the directory of the images (apxldimg.sql)
    (4) set the port HTTP (EXEC DBMS_XDB. SETHTTPPORT (8080))
    (5) enabled remote access (exec dbms_xdb.setListenerLocalAccess (l_access = > FALSE))

    Any thoughts on why web access may not work? Is there something else I need to do before users can access my application on the internet?

    Thank you
    Josh

    Well, you tried to shut down (or add an exception) / firewall/antivirus?

    Published by: Felipe Bertaglia on July 28, 2009 19:36 - / antivirus

  • PDF files accessed through the Explorer freeze

    Using Window 7 and Acrobat X Pro.  Have had this problem for some time.  If the PDFs are open short Adobe cut files work fine and can be moved to different screens.  However, if the files are opened through the Explorer 80% of the time they open and missing the top of the header, is unable to move the file or drag to another screen.  Need to minimize and bring back several times before it corrects itself (now, it does not correct itself).  Have to spend a lot of time to open the main shortcut files.

    I ran the updates, repairs etc with no luck.  All of the suggestions.

    BZ

    Hi wmz96531208,

    Install the drive using this link Adobe - Adobe Acrobat Reader DC Distribution, then check if it makes a difference.

    Kind regards

    Nicos

  • If I buy a monthly account of xfinity wifi (which allows internet access through the device unique registred) can I use apple TV connected to my TV to the stream of the device on my TV?

    using apple tv to stream xfinity wifi

    The Apple tv needs Internet - wifi or Ethernet. Access normally means places that they have agreements with wifi (i.e. from Starbucks, McDonald's etc.). But you will need a connection Internet for the Apple TV work from your home. Although some use the hotspot on their phone.  You need a speed of ISP at 8mbps for HD streaming on iTunes or netflix requires only 5 for HD (due to compression).

    short answer is that you must get xfinity as your ISP not only access hotspot...

Maybe you are looking for