Intrinsic safety

Similar Questions

• Standards for guaranteed merge pdf

  Well, the question might be quite basic, but like many others I noticed that it is possible to merge PDFs secured with another program or another tool. My question is: is it ok to merge the secure pdf files, or is it the intention of a pdf secured shouldn't power fusion - as it is not editable?

  Acrobat will merge PDFs secure in a portfolio; He won't do otherwise.

  The standard definines method of security and a degree of expectation. Since the merger of the two documents in a secure delete intrinsically safety since at least one of them, that is not a responsible thing to do.

  It may seem a simple exercise of programming by changing encryption for the first file (for example), but that basically offers an 'easy' option off for security, since if one of the files has cast security, then the user can easily use a document with known security seize unknown security. Many apps does not respect the security, but then many programmers do not buy into the ideas expressed in the standard.

• 1366 versus 1155, 970 against 2600K

  Hello

  I know that this has been discussed in various topics, but I want to start my own because there are a few things I want to go right on competition between 1155 and 1366 socket or i7970 against i7 - 2600K.

  I know that most of the "experts" here, including the guys behind the Benchmark PPBM5 prefer the platform 1366, rating of the 1155 platform platform only a budget that will not be able to handle the most demanding tasks in CS5, or at least it won't be a quick system. My question is this:

  Why are there so many platforms 1155, i7 - 2600K, scoring high marks on the PPBM5 Benchmark when it is only classified as a platform of 'budget '?

  To be honest, it seems that many here haven't advice to use the platform 1155 at all due to the absence of channels pci against 1366 and less run memory dual channel (although a few sites/tests show that the dual channel on SB performs as well as the triple channel on 1366).

  The cue point not focus on the system to show the real differende between 4 or 6 hearts?

  Or is the number of the i7 - 2600K so high due to the fact that more people can afford a system like this rather than the 980/990 overpriced and a bit overrated 970?

  Among the 100 best results on the test bench, here are some results:

  16 i7 - 2600K systems

  5 i7-970

  12 i7 950

  24 i7 980

  It is pretty darn good for a 'budget' system, I guess... or is it just for trash when same (1155), a lot of people seem to claim that if I ask. Benchmark shows that it can do a great job compared to many 980 systems configured as its propperly. It is then the right to simply call it a budget system? A budget system is in my mind a 'less efficient' system... no mather if you are a reseller or not (I build players, it's my first high-end system (4 +))...

  Unfortunately it is assigned false assumptions on HARD drive configurations. Those who have already made people to purchase configurations that have little done for performance or have actually caused a new headache or complications and at a high cost. The main consideration with HARD drive configurations is to achieve the transfer rate optimum for the hardware codec you are dealing with. Once you are in addition the performance gain is minimal or non-existent. So once you answer in the examination of optimal training for codecs that you treat, the configuration must be based around what type of redundancy data, you need in partnership with a strategy of backup. The standard of the golden rule is all the data which costs you or loss of the company needs 2 data recovery/fail safe minimum points. So if you have data on the working disks in the system, you can at least 2 recovery points of where these readers would fail. Redundant RAID arrays give you one level of intrinsic safety, but life is the main reason for the raid beyond performance matrices. The second foolproof would be an external backup or image to shoot if the raid fails. Now if you are running a raid 0 for performance, you want to 2 points of external backup/image to shoot since the raid 0 is not considered to be no protection. If you maintain that those are not safe points then raid 0 has small disadvantage compared to the performance of gain until you go over 3 discs. At this time, the risk of failure of disc 1 of these readers is quite high with the failure rate current in the car that you want a rather redundant raid volume to protect the table. This is the point of you compare performance/redundancy pro and cons for levels of Raid 3, 5, 6 and 10.

  Summary and application of all this is that a player 2 raid 0 of mechanical controls or a single SSD gives you transfer rate optimal for XDCam, H264, Canon XF, HDV, AVCHD, most versions Pro Res, DVCPro HD, AVCIntra, M-Jpeg, most versions of DNxHD and 1080 Cineform. R3D, Cineform Raw, Pro Res compressed and 444 will use according to the amount of layers higher transfer rates. In addition, your drive considerations are and should be articulated around the points of redundancy/backup. That is why the SB2600 platform is more that sufficient for 50% workflows, given the requirements of raid array really rely on the protection data more performance. If you configure large raids for a performance with any of the codecs listed first then you are throwing money. Take what your data protection needs should be for your needs and then determine if matrices raid great sense financially or not. Which will then lead you to the necessary platform for your configurations.

  Eric

  ADK

• Intrinsic blackBerry smartphones?

  I'm curious to know if anyone can tell me which Blackberry phones are inherently safe. I work in an environment where only intrinsically safe phones are allowed and I don't see any reference to that in any Blackberry handset specifications. Thank you.

  Hi and welcome to the forums!

  Here, it is the safety and product information, you will need. Page 11.

  http://NA.BlackBerry.com/eng/deliverables/4641/english_9530_SIB.PDF

  Thank you

  Don't forget to adjust your thread. Put the check mark in the green box containing your answer! Thank you

• How can I connect to a wifi network when I get the message 'safety recommendation' when I try to join?

  I have problems connecting to the WiFi at the hotel, as I have upgraded to iOS 10. When I try to join, I get a message "safety recommendation", and then it does nothing else. Prior to the update of the iOS, it would open an another Popup screen that lets me enter the password for the hotel but is not past with iOS 10. How do go?

  Please read use captives Wi - Fi networks on your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch - Apple Support.

  You may need to deselect Auto-Join and/or auto-connect on some networks in captivity. Otherwise, it may seem to connect for a second or two, only to disconnect immediately, leaving you without the possibility to open a session.

• IOS 10.2 safety recommendation

  I come home and my iPhone 6 s & iPad Pro have trouble connect to my router, Cisco (by ComCast).

  I use iOS version 10.0.2.

  Under settings > Wi - Fi > I get a new notice saying "safety recommendation".

  Low security

  WPA is not considered safe

  Configure your router to use WPA2-Personal (AES) security type for this network.

  This message does not appear on my Mackbook Pro (using the wireless) or on my iMac via Ethernet connection.

  My router did change? Should Qwest reconfigure it?

  10 iOS upgrade caused this difference?

  If you use a router to older model, it can only use the WPA setting.  As says the message configuration WPA is not sure the new security settings.  I doubt that the router has changed or updated IOS 10 has changed.  If your router does not have the new settings, I would recommend that you get a new more secure router.  If the century link provided the router, yes they should replace it.

• Teach the navigation safety for seniors

  Hello world

  I am currently teacher long term unemployed and people in the 1950s the use of the internet.
  Most of my students is not convinced, most of them never used internet before.
  I try to help the digital devide providing a glimpse into the digital world, cramped opportunities for work, shopping, networking, everything that
  I would like to know if there is an official of the firefox org program. that I could download and send my students to learn.

  Thank you very much

  There are some programs in reading, writing and participate in the web. It does not resemble an accurate adjustment so you should look at and see what you think would be helpful:

  • https://teach.Mozilla.org/teach-like-Mozilla/Web-literacy/
  • https://teach.Mozilla.org/activities/

  (Ignore the parties on the creation of websites like that it is beyond the scope of what you are looking for).

  Moreover, not Mozilla, but relevant:

  • https://www.FBI.gov/scams-safety/fraud/internet_fraud

• 'webplugin' does not support the maximum safety level of safari plugins

  Last night, I got connected to my Svat security system using Safari and left the computer with the browser showing all the security cameras. Early in the morning about 3 or 04:00 I was awake by restarting the computer I noticed that the OS has been updated.

  For now, I am trying to connect to my security system and Safari can not access the server. I went into properties and noticed the ['webplugin' does not support the maximum safety level of safari plug-ins] my security system stop working in windows because of the plugins for a long time so my only option is to use my mac-mini to access the system and now what happens.

  The name of the plugin in the security system is called HiDVRPlugin.dmg and the system is Svat. I tried to go to Safari preferences and enabling the plugin, but it still does not work.

  Any ideas on how to re activate or difficulty this plugin?

  Thank you

  Go back to an earlier version of Mac OS X is not an option? Or may be using a different browser?

• Firefox version 37.0.1 - "serious safety defect".

  I went to http://www.greenpasture.org/public/Home/index.cfm , and it displayed the following message is displayed:

  We see that you use as browser Firefox version 37.0. This browser presents a serious safety defect and is not recommended for use on this Web site. Please change to Internet Explorer, Chrome, Safari or Opera or another browser to continue to navigate this site without problem.

  Is this true?
  -If not, why they display it, who else thinks that this is the case, and whence this rumor?
  -If Yes, when is this corrected?

  PS - I'll send you a print/copy of my computer screen to your Web page of "Feedback" feature, but I could not submit it here. You can add this feature in the feature?

  I have just returned to the scene to capture a screenshot of the Message Security and it is no longer present. I guess that Mozilla or greener pastures solved the problem.

• I have a new idea called (active safety) and would be happy if I can have apple as my sponsor because the idea is new and I have a great expectations most apple applications will be part of my idea. So who can help? who should I contact at apple?

  I have a new idea called (active safety) and would be happy if I can have apple as my sponsor because the idea is new and I have a great expectations most apple applications will be part of my idea. So who can help? who should I contact at apple?

  Apple does not project sponsor, but you can contact Apple directly here > http://www.apple.com/contact/

• Try to link the large file to send. Keep is asked master pw to the safety device. I changed master pw on firefox and TB but still the same response.

  I've tried time and again to send this file. I've never synced before so I got that all set in place. Then ask master passwork safety device. So don't think that I had never set up an account and created the password. When you try to send email that I ask to link it goes to 'box' and I allow thunderbird to use use it. can he request master password and I type that in and it doesn't work. I have reset master pw for firefox and thunderbird and still can't make it work. I don't really know what I'm doing here so any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you!

  If the error message is:
  The message is "Please enter the master password for the software security device."

  then, it is possible that you have defined a master password in Thunderbird.

  The password protects the passwords of account that Thunderbird remembered. You can reset the password. More information in this article.

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Master_password

  Each account will have a password is the same one used to access the webmail account using a browser.
  However, it is quite easy to find this password, if other people have access to your computer user account.

  A master password is used to protect against people to see these passwords if they get access to your computer user and Thunderbird account.

• Google says that Thunderbird does not respect safety standards. They specficly the list, Thunderbird and MS Outlook. Will there be an update that resolves this problem?

  I tried to have thunderbird connect and download email from one of my google accounts. I kept getting errors of password, then one email from Google on another account, telling me that this account has failed. partial quote below. They indicate that Thunderbird no longer meets modern safety standards. Will there be an update that will fix this?

  Quote and links of google with details about the new security configuration. --------

  Hi Bruce,
  

  Recently, we have blocked an attempt to connect to your account [...].

  Connect attempt details
  Date & time: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 02:54:40 UTC
  Geographical area: New York, USA.

  If it was you
  You can switch to an application made by Google like Gmail to access your account (recommended) or change your settings to https://www.google.com/settings/security/lesssecureapps so that your account is no longer protected by modern security standards.

  For more information, see https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6010255.

  There may be an update, it is highly debated. "modern safety standard" Google are trying to force all power is a web standard not a standard mail. To work properly, the application should act as a browser. Something of a security problem for an email client that is not a browser.

  They mention Outlook or Thunderbird, as they are the soloists. The truth is there is not an email on the planet other than Google apps web client in a browser or on a mobile device that meet the standard. Want your Yahoo or Hotmail account to collect your messages to Gmail... No, they are less secure and in this function. Wish that Google can use to retrieve the messages of others... wow they use the less secure approach to POP and IMAP with password authentication.

  But Google now have your phone number to add to their gold mine limited personal information to serve adds with.

  The bottom line is to enable less secure apps. They are in line with standards applications. They are not less safe, they do not respect arbitrary authentication standard Googles.

• Command line to install a safety device

  Is there one was to install security via command line?
  Example: ActivClient (acpkcs211.dll) in order to allow the CAC/PKI authentication.

  Normally scrolls the Options - tab - certificates - safety in the graphical interface of advanced devices.

  Thanks for your support!

  You will need to do this, use the specific NSS utilities.

  • https://developer.Mozilla.org/NSS/tools
  • https://developer.Mozilla.org/NSS/tools/NSS_Tools_modutil
  • https://developer.Mozilla.org/NSS/tools/NSS_Tools_certutil

• Norton Security no longer works with Firefox update, if I'm afraid to use it. I want safety navigation

  According to my info in Firefox I have Firefox 15.0.1 & it is up-to-date.
  I can no longer use Firefox with all my saved bookmarks and familiarity that Norton Security programs I got Comcast no longer work with Firefox. Whenever I use it, it says that my safety is compromised. I don't have any protection. Currently I use internet for purchases, that I count on privacy and security, so I now use Sarari, which I don't like at the well.

  Using Firefox, I Googled, found the info that says everything I need to do is to upgrade my Norton with Live Update and then restart Firefox. Do it, but it doesn't help, still has the same lack of protection.

  See [935636/questions/935636] [MAC] norton does not support firefox 15

• I can't retrieve my password to iCloud and I forgot my answers to the question of safety

  I can't retrieve my password to iCloud and I forgot my answers to the question of safety

  You must ask security team account Apple to reset your security questions. To contact them, click here and choose a method; If this page does not list one for your country or if you are unable to call, complete and submit this form.

  
  (141868)