IPSEC and routing protocols

Hello world

I read that IPSEC does not support routing with VPN's Site to the other protocols because both are Layer4.

This means that if Site A must reach the B Site over a WAN link, we use static IP on the Site A and Site B router?

In my lab at home I config Site to Site VPN systems and they work correctly using OSPF does that mean that IPSEC supports the routing protocol?

IF someone can explain this please?

Thank you

Mahesh

There is no problem with the routing on IPsec protocol, there are limits to some implmentations.

Our old (strives, but still popular) crypto maps where such implemtation.

What you need to remember, is that to make routing protocols (more) on IPsec, you must ensure that multicast is allowed through, i.e. your traffic selectors should be postponed. Another thing is that some of these protocols do a check if Hellos were recived leave a subnet connected etc etc. Of course, this isn't a problem with BGP (or most of the problems can be overcome easily).

New implementations - side Cisco using protections of tunnel - we can run protcols routing on IPsec with very few restrictions.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

IPSEC tunnel and Routing Support protocols

Hello world

I read that IPSEC does not support routing with VPN's Site to the other protocols because both are Layer4.

This means that if Site A must reach the B Site over a WAN link, we use static IP on the Site A and Site B router?

In my lab at home I config Site to Site VPN systems and they work correctly using OSPF does that mean that IPSEC supports the routing protocol?

IF someone can explain this please?

OSPF config one side

router ospf 1

3.4.4.4 router ID

Log-adjacency-changes

area 10-link virtual 10.4.4.1

passive-interface Vlan10

passive-interface Vlan20

3.4.4.4 to network 0.0.0.0 area 0

network 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 10

network 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

network 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

network 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

network 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

network 192.168.98.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

network 192.168.99.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

3550SMIA #sh ip route

Code: C - connected, S - static, mobile R - RIP, M-, B - BGP

D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone

N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2

E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2

i - IS - Su - summary IS, L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS level - 2

-IS inter area, * - candidate failure, U - static route by user

o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded route static

Gateway of last resort is 192.168.5.3 to network 0.0.0.0

192.168.12.0/24 [13/110] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

100.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

O 100.100.100.100 [110/3] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

3.0.0.0/8 is variably divided into subnets, 2 subnets, 2 masks

O 3.3.3.3/32 [110/2] via 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

C 3.4.4.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0

C 192.168.30.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan30

64.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

O E2 64.59.135.150 [110/300] through 192.168.5.3, 1d09h, FastEthernet0/11

4.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

O 4.4.4.4 [110/2] via 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

C 192.168.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10

172.31.0.0/24 is divided into subnets, 4 subnets

O E2 172.31.3.0 [110/300] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

O E2 172.31.2.0 [110/300] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

O E2 172.31.1.0 [110/300] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

O E2 172.31.0.0 [110/300] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

O 192.168.11.0/24 [110/3] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

O 192.168.98.0/24 [110/2] via 192.168.99.1, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/8

C 192.168.99.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/8

192.168.20.0/24 C is directly connected, Vlan20

192.168.5.0/31 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

C 192.168.5.2 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/11

C 10.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Tunnel0

192.168.6.0/31 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

O 192.168.6.2 [110/2] via 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

192.168.1.0/24 [13/110] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

O * E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.5.3, 1d09h, FastEthernet0/11

B side Config

Side A

router ospf 1

Log-adjacency-changes

network 192.168.97.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

network 192.168.98.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

network 192.168.99.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

1811w # sh ip route

Code: C - connected, S - static, mobile R - RIP, M-, B - BGP

D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone

N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2

E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2

i - IS - Su - summary IS, L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS level - 2

-IS inter area, * - candidate failure, U - static route by user

o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded route static

Gateway of last resort is 192.168.99.2 to network 0.0.0.0

192.168.12.0/24 [110/14] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

100.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

O 100.100.100.100 [110/4] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

3.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, 2 subnets

O 3.3.3.3 [110/3] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

O 3.4.4.4 [110/2] via 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

O 192.168.30.0/24 [110/2] via 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

64.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

O E2 64.59.135.150 [110/300] through 192.168.99.2, 1d09h, FastEthernet0

4.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

O 4.4.4.4 [110/3] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

O 192.168.10.0/24 [110/2] via 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

172.31.0.0/24 is divided into subnets, 4 subnets

O E2 172.31.3.0 [110/300] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

O E2 172.31.2.0 [110/300] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

O E2 172.31.1.0 [110/300] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

O E2 172.31.0.0 [110/300] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

O 192.168.11.0/24 [110/4] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

C 192.168.98.0/24 is directly connected, BVI98

C 192.168.99.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0

O 192.168.20.0/24 [110/2] via 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

192.168.5.0/31 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

O 192.168.5.2 [110/2] via 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

192.168.6.0/31 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

O 192.168.6.2 [110/3] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

192.168.1.0/24 [110/14] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

O * E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.99.2, 1d09h, FastEthernet0

Thank you

Mahesh

Mahesh.

Indeed, solution based purely crypto-card are not compatible with a routing protocol. Crypto card however is the legacy config we support on IOS. The best practice is to use the protection of tunnel. Any routing protocol would work then.

for example

https://learningnetwork.Cisco.com/docs/doc-2457

It's the best solution we currenty have

QoS and routing VPN IPSEC protocols

Hello world

You must confirm if the QOS is usable on IPSEC Site to site VPN?

IPSEC VPN it can also participate in routing protocols.

Example of

An address 192.168.10.1 site source

B Source 192.168.10.2 site address

Now for Site A to Site B IPSEC to join a way is that we can use our ISP as static IP address

Site has

192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0 address 10.x.x.x ISP

Using routing protocols

Is it possible to use OSPF between two sites and advertise routes in OSPF?

Will they see each other as ospf neis?

Thank you

MAhesh

Hello Manu,

Yes, we can do,

Let me provide you with the following information:

On the quality of service

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008080dfa7.shtml

On OSPF

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00804acfea.shtm

Private of IPSec VPN-private network between ASA and router

Hello community,

This is first time for me to configure IPSec VPN between ASA and router. I have an ASA 5540 at Headquarters and 877 router to EH Branch

Headquarters ASA summary.

Peer IP: 111.111.111.111

Local network: 10.0.0.0

Branch

Peer IP: 123.123.123.123

LAN: 192.168.1.0/24

Please can someone help me set up the vpn.

Hello

This guide covers exactly what you need:

Establishment of ASDM and SDM - http://www.netcraftsmen.net/resources/archived-articles/273.html

Tunnel VPN - ASA to the router configuration:

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a9a7a3.shtml#ASDM

Kind regards

Jimmy

The IPSec VPN and routing

Hello

I was polishing my PSAB on since I am currently in a job where I can't touch a lot of this stuff. By a laboratory set up a site to IPSec VPN between two routers IOS.

For example:

https://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps9422/products_configuration_example09186a0080ba1d0a.shtml

The routers must specify how to route to the protected network. Although I guess they could just use a default route to 172.17.1.2 as well.

for example IP road 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.17.1.2

172.17.1.2 won't have the slightest clue as to how to route for 10.10.10.0

Even in an example with a tunnel between the ASA and the router IOS ASA failed to indicate a direct route to the subnet protected from 10.20.10.0, but it must still have a default route configuration. (https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a9a7a3.shtml#CLI)

So it is basically saying, to reach the protected subnet to resolve the next hop on a device that has no idea where this subnet is anyway. Shouldn't all the peer IP-based routing, and not on a subnet that routers between the two should have no idea they exist?

The main hypothesis that I have here is that the protected subnets are not accessible unless the VPN tunnel is up. Most of my experience of the VPN site-to-site is with PIX / ASA, and I've never had to specify a route towards the protected subnet (for example 172.16.228.0). I guess he just used his default gateway that has an Internet IP belonging to the ISP. However the ISP has no idea where is 172.16.228.0.

Edit: I found a thread, do not report with Cisco but IPSec in general, this seems to be the question in case I don't have a lot of sense:

http://comments.Gmane.org/Gmane.OS.OpenBSD.misc/192986

He still does not seem logical to me. If I have a tunnel linking the two class C networks by internet, the only routers having knowledge of these networks are the two counterparts. Why a course should be (static, dynamic, default etc,) which seems to send traffic to a device that do not know where is the class C networks? Although I have to take in my example with the 172.17.228.0 my ASA was not actually sends out packets to my ISP gateway with 172.17.228.0 in them.

The purpose of the trail is * not * to send traffic to your next jump. You are right that the next hop router has no idea what to do with this package. This way is important for the local operation. The router must find the interface of output for the package. 'S done it with the road to the next-hop-router. If you remember that the road to your peer IPSec, your router must do a recursive search routing. After the outging interface is found, traffic is sent to this interface, the card encryption on this interface jumps and protects your traffic that is routed to your IPSec peer.

--
Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

Site to Site between ASA VPN connection and router 2800

I'm trying to get a L2L VPN working between a ASA code 8.4 and a 2800 on 12.4.

I first saw the following errors in the debug logs on the side of the ASA:

Error message % PIX | ASA-6-713219: KEY-GAIN message queues to deal with when
ITS P1 is complete.

I see the following on the end of 2800:

ISAKMP: (0): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 157
ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is NAT - T v3
ISAKMP: (0): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 69
ISAKMP (0): provider ID is NAT - T RFC 3947
ISAKMP: (0): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (0): treatment of frag vendor id IKE payload
ISAKMP: (0): IKE Fragmentation support not enabled
ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM1 = IKE_R_MM1

ISAKMP: (0): built NAT - T of the seller-rfc3947 ID
ISAKMP: (0): send package to x.x.x.x my_port 500 peer_po0 (R) MM_SA_SETUP
ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM1 = IKE_R_MM2

ISAKMP (0): packet received from x.x.x.x dport 500 sports global (R)

MM_SA_SETUP
ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM2 = IKE_R_MM3

ISAKMP: (0): processing KE payload. Message ID = 0
ISAKMP: (0): processing NONCE payload. Message ID = 0
ISAKMP: (0): found peer pre-shared key x.x.x.x corresponding
ISAKMP: (2345): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (2345): provider ID is the unit
ISAKMP: (2345): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (2345): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 54
ISAKMP: (2345): provider ID is XAUTH
ISAKMP: (2345): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (2345): addressing another box of IOS!
ISAKMP: (2345): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (2345): vendor ID seems the unit/DPD but hash mismatch
ISAKMP: receives the payload type 20
ISAKMP (2345): sound not hash no match - this node outside NAT
ISAKMP: receives the payload type 20
ISAKMP (2345): no NAT found for oneself or peer
ISAKMP: (2345): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
ISAKMP: (2345): former State = new State IKE_R_MM3 = IKE_R_MM3

ISAKMP: (2345): sending package x.x.x.x my_port Exchange 500 500 (R)

MM_KEY_EXCH

----------

This is part of the configuration of the ASA:

network of the ABCD object
10.20.30.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

network of the ABCD-Net object
172.16.10.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

cry-map-77-ip object-group XXXX object abc-site_Network allowed extended access list

access list abc-site extended permitted ip object-group XXXX object abc-site_Network

ip access list of abc-site allowed extended object abc-site_Network object-group XXXX-60

NAT (any, any) static source 20 XXXX XXXX-20 destination static abc-site_Network abc-site_Network

NAT (any, any) static source 20 XXXX XXXX-20 destination static abc-site_Network abc-site_Network

XXXX-20

object-group network XXXX-20
ABCD-Net network object
object-abcd-Int-Net Group

XXXX_127

object-group network XXXX-20
ABCD-Net network object
object-abcd-Int-Net Group

ip access list of abc-site allowed extended object abc-site_Network object-group XXXX-60

Crypto card off-map-44 11 match address cry-map-77
card crypto out-map-44 11 counterpart set 62.73.52.xxx
card crypto out-map-44 11 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5

cry-map-77-ip object-group XXXX object abc-site_Network allowed extended access list

Crypto card off-map-44 11 match address cry-map-77
card crypto out-map-44 11 counterpart set 62.73.52.xxx
card crypto out-map-44 11 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5

card crypto out-map-44 11 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA ikev1

object-group network XXXX
ABCD-Net network object
object-abcd-Int-Net Group

------------------------

Here is a part of the 2800:

!
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
ISAKMP crypto key r2374923 address 72.15.21.xxx
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
!
card crypto cry-map-1 1 ipsec-isakmp
the value of 72.15.21.xxx peer
game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
match address VPN
!
type of class-card inspect match class-map-vpn
game group-access 100
type of class-card inspect cm-inspect-1 correspondence
group-access name inside-out game
type of class-card inspect correspondence cm-inspect-2
match the name of group-access outside
!
!
type of policy-card inspect policy-map-inspect
class type inspect cm-inspect-1
inspect
class class by default
drop

type of policy-card inspect policy-map-inspect-2
class type inspect class-map-vpn
inspect
class type inspect cm-inspect-2
class class by default
drop
!

!
interface FastEthernet0
IP address 74.25.89.xxx 255.255.255.252
NAT outside IP
IP virtual-reassembly
security of the outside Member area
automatic duplex
automatic speed
crypto cry-card-1 card
!
interface FastEthernet1
no ip address
Shutdown
automatic duplex
automatic speed
!
IP nat inside source overload map route route-map-1 interface FastEthernet0
!
IP access-list extended inside-out
IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any
IP nat - acl extended access list
deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 0.0.255.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
refuse the 10.10.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255
refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 0.0.255.255
refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
allow an ip
outside extended IP access list
allow an ip
list of IP - VPN access scope
IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255
IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 0.0.255.255
IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
IP 10.200.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
28.20.14.xxx.0.0 0.0.255.255 ip permit 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
ip licensing 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 23 allow 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 23 allow 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 23 allow 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 123 note category class-map-LCA-4 = 0
access-list 123 allow ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 123 allow ip 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 123 allow ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 123 allow ip 0.0.255.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 123 allow ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
!
!
!

!
route-map-1 allowed route map 1
match the IP nat - acl
!

Hello

I quickly browsed your config and I could notice is

your game of transformation (iskamp) on SAA and router are not the same, try to configure the same on both sides.

in the statement of the ASA NAT you gave (any, any) try to give the name of the interface instead of a whole.

15.1 TMS does not respect the preferred routing protocol

TMS 15.1

C series: TC7.2.1, TC7.3.4

SX20 and 80: TC7.3.4 and EC8.01

All the saved settings to VCS with addresses both H.323 and SIP.

Conference TMS-settings of parameters / advanced: shares of routing protocol: H.323

By default the Protocol of appeal located on all the evaluation criteria: H.323

When creating new conferences, connection parameter is defined as "SIP" despite the preference above, this to H.323 does not change the connection string to [email protected] / * / the alias preferred without any suffix.

I do not see anything either in the TMS open and resolved the issues list, then, until I opened a case with TAC, has anyone already opened a file, or found a way to solve this problem? (Couldn't see this issue in TMS 14.4.x)

Thank you/Bravo

/Jens

Hi Jens,

I can't reproduce your problem here. I have two end points recorded on my VCSes, and when their scheduling in TMS 15.1.0 it is showing that H.323 in connection settings.

If I click on "Settings" under the Action on the far right of the display of connection settings in MSD, I can change it to "IP - SIP" and used addresses change to SIP, and if I change it back to "IP - H.323", it changes again in the H.323 addresses.

Wayne

L2TP/IPSec and VRRP on Cisco VPN3000

Hello. I don't know if this is the right forum, please excuse me if this is not (of course a pointer to the right we'd appreciate it :)

I'm experimenting with the implementation of VPN 3000 Concentrator series VRRP, and it seems that when the unit of "backup" takes over, no L2TP/IPsec tunnel can be established more.

When the switch takes place, the backup device takes over VRRP group IP addresses, which are the IP address of the master own as well on VPN 3000. Thus, the backup unit manages two different IP addresses, its own ad group.

Well, what I observed using a sniffer is that while the IKE/IPSec packets come well to the group address, L2TP packets are by IP address of the backup device physical and clear instead of be encapsulated in IPSec travel packages. The client computer (PC Windows 2000) clearly ignores the L2TP packets and no L2TP/Ipsec tunnel can be established. PPTP tunnels work, however.

The foregoing does not occur when the VPN 3000 master works, like the VRRP group addresses are the same as its own interface addresses.

Now, VPN 3000 documentation or TAC documents explicitly say that L2TP/IPSec and VRRP are incompatible, but they do not mention compatibility as well (although they do mention the VRRP Protocol PPTP compatibility).

Did someone better informed than me? Is there a technical reason for the incompatibility between L2TP with VRRP, or it's a bug any?

Thank you

Roberto Patriarca

This has proved quite recently and a high severity bug has been open about it and is currently under review.

See http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCeb77328&Submit=Search for more details.

Nice work well in the survey.

LAN to lan vpn between ASA and router 7200

Hi friends,

I need to configure the lan to lan between ASA vpn (remote location) and router 7200 (on our network).

<7200 router="" (ip="" add:="" 10.10.5.2)="">-(Internet) -<(IP add:="" 192.168.12.2)="" asa(5510)="">---192.135.5.0/24 network

I will have the following configuration:

7200 router:

crypto ISAKMP policy 80

the enc

AUTH pre-shared

Group 1

life 3600

ISAKMP crypto key cisco123 address 192.168.12.2

Cryto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac VPNtrans

map VPNTunnel 80 ipsec-isakmp crypto

defined by peer 192.168.12.2

game of transformation-VPNtrans

match address 110

int fa0/0

IP add 10.10.5.2 255.255.255.192

IP virtual-reassembly

no ip route cache

Speed 100

full duplex

card crypto VPNTunnel

access-list 110 permit ip any 192.135.5.0 0.0.0.255

ASA:

int e0/0

nameif inside

security-level 100

192.135.5.254 Add IP 255.255.255.0

int e0/1

nameif outside

security-level 0

IP add 192.168.12.2 255.255.255.240

access-list ACL extended ip 192.135.5.0 allow 255.255.255.0 any

Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0 192.168.12.3 1

"pre-shared key auth" ISAKMP policy 10

ISAKMP policy 10-enc

ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

10 1 ISAKMP policy group

ISAKMP duration strategy of life 10-3600

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac VPNtran

card crypto VPN 10 matches the ACL address

card crypto VPN 10 set peer 10.10.5.2

card crypto VPN 10 the transform-set VPNtran value

tunnel-group 10.10.5.2 type ipsec-l2l

IPSec-attributes of type tunnel-group 10.10.5.2

cisco123 pre-shared key

card crypto VPN outside interface

ISAKMP allows outside

dhcpd address 192.135.5.1 - 192.135.5.250 inside

dhcpd dns 172.15.4.5 172.15.4.6

dhcpd wins 172.15.76.5 172.15.74.5

dhcpd lease 14400

dhcpd ping_timeout 500

dhcpd allow inside

Please check the configuration, please correct me if I missed something. I'm in a critical situation at the moment...

Please advise...

Thank you very much...

Where it fails at the present time?

Can you share out of after trying to establish the VPN tunnel:

See the isa scream his

See the ipsec scream his

Please also run the following debug to see where it is a failure:

debugging cry isa

debugging ipsec cry

Conflict of IPSec between IPSec and business VPN tunnels

I crushed a 2821 current c2800nm-adventerprisek9 - mz.124 - 22.YB8 at home with 2 gre IPSec tunnels for personal use, and my office will be held that a customer based IPSec VPN to connect to the corporate VPN. My problem is that when I want to connect to the corporate VPN, I see packages being encrypted and sent, but I would have never received the return packets. It seems that the IPSec VPN tunnels with IPSec from my office and router packages conflict trying to decrypt and gives this error. (I removed the public addresses for anonymity)

CRYPTO-4-RECVD_PKT_INV_SPI: decaps: rec would be package IPSEC a bad spi to destaddr = "myaddress", prot = 50, spi = 0xDB32344E (3677500494), port = "corpvpn".

When I remove the card encryption off-side WAN router, my Office VPN works immediately. I can change the configuration, either on the side of the IPSec GRE tunnels, but has no way for me to change any configuration on the corporate VPN. Does anyone know of a workaround on the cisco router? I can provide the running configs or view orders.

The 2821 also performs NAT overload for internet access.

Hello, Reed.

1. try to remove the interface crypto map and add "protection... profile ipsec tunnel." "to your VTI:

Crypto ipsec IPSEC profile

solid Set trans

int g0/0

No crypto map card

int tu1

Ipsec IPSEC protection tunnel profile

int tu2

Ipsec IPSEC protection tunnel profile

2. try to force your corpVPN to use encapsulation UDP instead of ESP.

Press L2L VPN, IPSEC, and L2TP PIX connections

Hi all

I'm trying to implement a solution on my FW PIX (pix804 - 24.bin) to be able to support a VPN L2L session with VPN dynamic user sessions where clients will use a mix of IPSEC(Nat detection) and L2TP. We have always supported things IPSEC and that worked great for many years. I'm now trying to Add L2TP support, so that I can support Android phones/ipads, etc. as well as Windows with built in VPN l2tp clients clients. Everything works well except for the new features of L2TP. Allows you to complete one phase but then tries to use the card encryption that is used for the VPN L2L. It seems to fail because IP addresses are not in the configured ACL to the crypto-map L2L. Does anyone know if there are any questions all these configurations support both. And if not can you see what I have wrong here, which would make it not work. Here are the relevant training:

C515 - A # sh run crypto
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set of society-ras-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac company-l2tp
life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
Dynamic crypto map company-ras 1 correspondence address company-dynamic
company Dynamics-card crypto-ras 1 set pfs
Dynamic crypto map company-ras 1 transform-set ESP-SHA-3DES ESP-3DES-MD5 company-ras
Dynamic crypto map company-ras 1 lifetime of security association set seconds 28800
company Dynamics-card crypto-ras 1 kilobytes of life together - the association of safety 4608000
crypto dynamic-map-ras company 2 address company-dynamic game
crypto dynamic-map company-ras 2 transform-set of society-l2tp
crypto dynamic-map company-ras 2 set security association lifetime seconds 28800
company Dynamics-card crypto-ras 2 kilobytes of life together - the association of safety 4608000
card crypto company-map 1 correspondence address company-colo
card crypto company-card 1 set pfs
card crypto company-card 1 set counterpart colo-pix-ext
card crypto card company 1 value transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 SHA-ESP-3DES
company-map 1 lifetime of security association set seconds 28800 crypto
card company-card 1 set security-association life crypto kilobytes 4608000
company-card 1 set nat-t-disable crypto card
company-card 2 card crypto ipsec-isakmp dynamic company-ras
business-card interface card crypto outside
crypto isakmp identity address
crypto ISAKMP allow outside

Crypto isakmp nat-traversal 3600

crypto ISAKMP policy 1
preshared authentication
3des encryption
sha hash
Group 2
life 86400
crypto ISAKMP policy 2
preshared authentication
3des encryption
md5 hash
Group 2
life 86400
C515 - A # sh run tunnel-group
attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
company-ras address pool
Group-LOCAL radius authentication server
Group Policy - by default-l2tp
IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
pre-shared-key *.
tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup ppp-attributes
PAP Authentication
No chap authentication
ms-chap-v2 authentication
eap-proxy authentication
type tunnel-group company-ras remote access
tunnel-group global company-ras-attributes
company-ras address pool
Group-LOCAL radius authentication server
tunnel-group company-ras ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *.
type tunnel-group company-admin remote access
attributes global-tunnel-group company-admin
company-admin address pool
Group-LOCAL radius authentication server
company strategy-group-by default-admin
IPSec-attributes of tunnel-group company-admin
pre-shared-key *.
PPP-attributes of tunnel-group company-admin
No chap authentication
ms-chap-v2 authentication
tunnel-group x.x.x.x type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group ipsec-attributes x.x.x.x
pre-shared-key *.
ISAKMP keepalive retry threshold 15 10
C515 - A # sh run Group Policy
attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
Server DNS 10.10.10.20 value 10.10.10.21
Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
enable PFS
Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
Split-tunnel-network-list value company-SPLIT-TUNNEL-ACL
company.int value by default-field
NAC-parameters DfltGrpPolicy-NAC-framework-create value
internal strategy of company-admin group
attributes of the strategy of company-admin group
WINS server no
DHCP-network-scope no
VPN-access-hour no
VPN - 20 simultaneous connections
VPN-idle-timeout 30
VPN-session-timeout no
Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec
disable the IP-comp
Re-xauth disable
Group-lock no
enable PFS
Split-tunnel-network-list value company-ADMIN-SPLIT-TUNNEL-ACL
L2TP strategy of Group internal
Group l2tp policy attributes
Server DNS 10.10.10.20 value 10.10.10.21
Protocol-tunnel-VPN l2tp ipsec
disable the PFS
Split-tunnel-policy tunnelall
company.int value by default-field
NAC-parameters DfltGrpPolicy-NAC-framework-create value

Relevant debug output

C515 - Has # Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 66.25.14.195, Oakley proposal is acceptable
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 66.25.14.195, IKE Peer included IKE fragmentation capability flags: Main Mode: real aggressive Mode: false
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 66.25.14.195, IKE SA proposal # 1, turn # 1 entry IKE acceptable Matches # 3 overall
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, status of automatic NAT detection: remote endpoint IS behind a NAT device this end is NOT behind a NAT device
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, previously allocated memory of liberation for permission-dn-attributes
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, for this connection Keep-alive type: None
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, Keep-alives configured on, but the peer does not support persistent (type = None)
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, timer to generate a new key to start P1: 21600 seconds.
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, data received in payload ID remote Proxy Host: address 172.16.0.104 17 of the Protocol, Port 0
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, data received in payload ID local Proxy Host: address x.x.x.x, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, detected L2TP/IPSec session.
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, QM IsRekeyed its not found old addr
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, static check card Crypto, check card company card, seq = 1 =...
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, static check card Crypto card = company-map, seq = 1, ACL does not proxy IDs src:66.25.14.195 dst: x.x.x.x
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, tunnel IPSec rejecting: no entry for crypto for proxy card proxy remote 66.25.14.195/255.255.255.255/17/0 local x.x.x.x/255.255.255.255/17/1701 on the outside interface
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x501c1f0, mess id 0xa181b866).
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, case of mistaken IKE responder QM WSF (struct & 0x501c1f0) , : QM_DONE EV_ERROR--> QM_BLD_MSG2 EV_NEGO_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_IS_REKEY--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_CONFIRM_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_PROC_MSG--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_HASH_OK--> QM_BLD_MSG2, NullEvent--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_COMP_HASH
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, peer table correlator Removing failed, no match!
Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: ignoring msg SA brand with Iddm 204910592 dead because ITS removal
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 66.25.14.195, Oakley proposal is acceptable
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 66.25.14.195, IKE Peer included IKE fragmentation capability flags: Main Mode: real aggressive Mode: false
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 66.25.14.195, IKE SA proposal # 1, turn # 1 entry IKE acceptable Matches # 3 overall
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, status of automatic NAT detection: remote endpoint IS behind a NAT device this end is NOT behind a NAT device
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, previously allocated memory of liberation for permission-dn-attributes
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, for this connection Keep-alive type: None
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, Keep-alives configured on, but the peer does not support persistent (type = None)
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, timer to generate a new key to start P1: 21600 seconds.
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, data received in payload ID remote Proxy Host: address 172.16.0.104 17 of the Protocol, Port 0
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, data received in payload ID local Proxy Host: address x.x.x.x, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, detected L2TP/IPSec session.
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, QM IsRekeyed its not found old addr
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, static check card Crypto, check card company card, seq = 1 =...
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, static check card Crypto card = company-map, seq = 1, ACL does not proxy IDs src:66.25.14.195 dst: x.x.x.x
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, tunnel IPSec rejecting: no entry for crypto for proxy card proxy remote 66.25.14.195/255.255.255.255/17/0 local x.x.x.x/255.255.255.255/17/1701 on the outside interface
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x501c1f0, mess id 0xa5db9562).
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, case of mistaken IKE responder QM WSF (struct & 0x501c1f0) , : QM_DONE EV_ERROR--> QM_BLD_MSG2 EV_NEGO_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_IS_REKEY--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_CONFIRM_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_PROC_MSG--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_HASH_OK--> QM_BLD_MSG2, NullEvent--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_COMP_HASH
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, peer table correlator Removing failed, no match!
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: ignoring msg SA brand with Iddm 204914688 dead because ITS removal

The outputs of two debugging who worry are the following:

Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, data received in payload ID remote Proxy Host: address 172.16.0.104 17 of the Protocol, Port 0
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, data received in payload ID local Proxy Host: address x.x.x.x, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701

Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, static check card Crypto, check card company card, seq = 1 =...
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, static check card Crypto card = company-map, seq = 1, ACL does not proxy IDs src:66.25.14.195 dst: x.x.x.x
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, tunnel IPSec rejecting: no entry for crypto for proxy card proxy remote 66.25.14.195/255.255.255.255/17/0 local x.x.x.x/255.255.255.255/17/1701 on the outside interface
Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x501c1f0, mess id 0xa5db9562).

This seems to indicate that his NAT detection but then do not assign to the entry card cryptography because networks are encrypted are not in the configured ACL that is true. He needs to use dynamic input and it doesn't seem to be.

I need to create another dynamic map entry to make it work instead of add lines to the same dynamic with a lower (higher) priority map entry?

Thanks in advance for any help here.

Hello

That won't do the trick, l2tp clients are picky kindda, so you know if they do not hit the correct strategy first they just stop trying. Follow these steps:

correspondence from the company of dynamic-map crypto-ras 1 address company-dynamic

No crypto-card set pfs dynamic company-ras 1

No crypto dynamic-map company-ras-1 transform-set ESP-SHA-3DES ESP-3DES-MD5 company-ras

Dynamic crypto map company-ras 1 transform-set company-l2tp SHA-ESP-3DES ESP-3DES-MD5 company-ras

The foregoing will not affect existing customers of IPsec at all, these clients will not use the statement of pfs and will link even if the correspondence address is not configured (it is optional), besides Cisco IPsec clients will be affected first the mode of transport policy and fail however they will continue to try and hit another police PH2.

Regarding your last question, I was referring specifically to the support of l2tp for android, and Yes, you will need to run one of these versions.

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa82/release/notes/asarn82.html#wp431562

Tavo-

Wireless connection unavailable on laptop, but shows all ok on pc and router

I was at Midway through a conversation today on msn when my wireless connection (on my laptop) disappeared. I checked my pc and everything seems ok, here, my netgear router shows that everything is fine. When I click on 'Find a wireless network' his party! I can access the net very well by plugging it but as soon as I go wireless, I still lost.

Tried to connect manually - says network with that name already there
Tried to re start all
All cables checked

It's a laptop Toshiba L300
Virgin cable broadband
Router NETGEAR Wireless

everything works fine as long as I'm using the cables.

I only had my laptop and router wireless for a month.

Please any other ideas what to do, I really need to be wireless for work as soon as possible

Hello severina_falls,

Thanks for posting on the Microsoft answers Community Forum.

I have some suggestions for you to see if we can provide you with your wireless connection.

(1) check that the WiFi switch is on on the front panel of your laptop. It is a quick check
(2) Recycle the router wireless on and outside. Wait at least one minute, then turn it back on. Retest with your wireless network.
(3) are getting you the error messages in the case where connects to deal with your wireless connection?
To join the event logs: click on the Start button, right-click computer, click on manage.
If you receive a notification of user account control , simply click on continue.
Double-click Event Viewer. Study summary of the the event logs for errors dealing with wireless.
(4) use System Restore to get your iIf wireless upward and running, you have a System Restore Point that was before starting the problem with your wireless network.
Use the following KB to get the procedure on the system restore.
936212 KB - how to repair the operating system and how to restore the configuration of the operating system to an earlier point in time in Windows Vista
http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/936212

If please post again and let us know if it helped to solve your problem or if you need further assistance.

Sincerely, Marilyn
Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

IPSEC and SSH2

Does anyone know if the switch Cisco 3750 G supports IPSEC and SSH2?

Mohsen

Yep, that's what I would do as well.

I'm happy to have helped.

Jon

Issue of ASA NAT and routing

Hello

I have a question about NAT and routing on the SAA. I'm relatively new to ASA and don't know if it works or not. I have a pool of public IP (209.x.x.x/28) that routes my ISP to the external interface of my ASA. IP was assigned address for the outside of the ASA is an address of 206.x.x.2/24 with a default GW of 206.x.x.1. I intend using NAT to allow my web/mail servers on the DMZ (192.168.x.x) use 209.x.x.x addresses. However, I do know how to make it work since I'm not arping on any interface for 209.x.x.x addresses as they will be sent to the 206.x.x.2 address by the ISP. Can I just set up a translation NAT (on the external interface?) of the 209.x.x.x on 192.168.x.x address and the ASA will figure it out?

Thanks for the help.

Todd

The ASa will figure it out, he will answer ARP queries for all that he has set up in a "static" command As long as th PSIA routes 209.x.x.x directly to the ASA addresses then it should all work fine.

You just need to add lines like the following:

static (dmz, external) 209.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.255 192.168.x.x

for each of your internal servers in the DMZ. Then an access-list to allow only HTTP/SMTP/etc through these addresses 209.x.x.x.

list of allowed inbound tcp access any host 209.x.x.x eq smtp

list of allowed inbound tcp access any host 209.y.y.y eq http

Access-group interface incoming outside

Client certificate and router WebVPN

Hello!

In my test harness I can not to run my webvpn configuration =.

I have several components: AD MS, MS CS (but without NDE), 2911 router and client computer. Client and router have a certificate of MS CS. In my setup I use certificate or aaa (LDAP) authentication and authentication work aaa good. But the client certificate authentication does not work. And my internal https services do not work too--"no certificate or invalid", but this strange because I imported the CA certificate for that.

Can you help me it work?

My version of 2911:

Cisco IOS software, software C2900 (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1 (3) T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

My Config:

AAA authentication login webvpn group local ldap

IP local pool webvpn 192.168.200.1 192.168.200.254

bind authenticates root-dn cn = webvpn, OU = team, dc = domain, dc = com password [email protected]/ * /.

WebVPN vpn gateway

IP address port 4443

SSL root-ca trustpoint

development

!

WebVPN install svc flash0:/webvpn/anyconnect-dart-win-2.5.3055-k9.pkg sequence 1

!

employee framework WebVPN

SSL authentication check all

!

connection message 'Portal VPN'

!

the policy group peche1

List of URLS "on the inside".

functions compatible svc

filter VPN SPLIT tunnel

SVC-pool of addresses "webvpn" netmask 255.255.255.0

SVC by default-domain "domain.com".

SVC Dungeon-client-installed

SVC split dns "domain.com".

SVC split include 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0

SVC-Server primary dns 192.168.1.1

SVC-Server secondary dns 192.168.1.2

Citrix enabled

virtual-model 1

strategy-group-by default peche1

AAA authentication list webvpn

vpn gateway

authentication certificate

user name - sign up

root CA trustpoint-AC

User location flash0 profile: / userprof

development

!

Crypto pki trustpoint root-ca

Terminal registration

revocation checking no

rsakeypair root-ca

!

I imported with CA pkcs12 certificate.

My debug (it happened so I am trying to access my webvpn portal and I choose my certificate of MS CS for access)

5 Jun 11:22:39: WV: validated_tp: cert_username: matched_ctx:

5 Jun 11:22:39: WV: could not get opssl appinfo sslvpn

5 Jun 11:22:39: WV: could not get opssl appinfo sslvpn

5 Jun 11:22:39: WV: error: no certificate validated for the customer

Can someone explain to me why it does not work?

Resolved by the update IOS - version 15.2 (4) M2.

Concerning

IPSEC and routing protocols

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for