IPSEC encryption beyond the borders of the country

A question about creating encrypted VPN tunnels in the United States to the Ireland and/or the United Kingdom:

Are the limits or restrictions on encrypt an IPSEC Tunnel with regard to connections sent outside the United States?  My brain has a few blurred memories of "export restrictions".

You can use crypto enough everywhere, but you can use crypto "fort" in us of the countries 'limited '.  In some cases, there is a limit of flow crypto (85 Mb/s of memory).

The United Kingdom and the Ireland wouldn't the American controlled export destinations for strong cryptography, so you won't have any problems.

Note that most of the Cisco routers with base licenses comply with the speed limit, and you must purchase the HSEC license to activate the additional throughput.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • My screen goes beyond the borders of my TV screen. How can I adapt to fit the edges of my screen with to lose part of the picture displayed?

    Was a g43/g45 chipset update, now my screen goes beyond its borders, and I can't find the setting to define the borders. I found once, so I know it's possible. Simply forgotten where it is.

    did a restore in safe mode, and it fixed the problem... Ty... always want to find that place of _ where I adjusted 'aspect ratio' before... but thanks for the help david, problem solved.

  • How is the ComboBox extends beyond the borders of the window?

    I noticed that the ComboBox control may extend beyond the borders of the window. I would like to implement something like that to a custom control of the mine, but can't find a way to do it. I know that happens simply to allocate a large enough value via setVisibleRowCount, but what interests me is how the combobox can be larger than the pane that is in that I can copy this behavior for my own control.

    Here is a screenshot to clarify what I mean.

    Thanks in advance

    The part of the ComboBox popup is represented by a PopupControl. It's a subclass of window, it is not constrained by the limits of the window in which is placed the ComboBox control.

  • EFS is encrypted using the Local System account

    Hey all. I created a Server 2008 R2 to encrypt a set a record by using the domain administrator account. All is well for about a week. Now I can't decrypt files. I looked in the file properties, click Advanced and details and it sees 'SYSTEM (SYSTEM@NT AUTHORITY) as users who can access this file. In the previous files can I decrypt shows administrator. I can't understand why the system account is encryption now all my files in this folder and how do I get those decrypted?

    This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

    http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  • Windows desktop extends beyond the edges of the screen to the external monitor.

    I have a laptop Sony Vaio with Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit. I connected the laptop to my Samsung HDTV via HDMI 24 ". I put it to only show the desktop on the HD TV, but the Office extends beyond the borders of the HDTV screen. The screen resolution is set at 1280 x 720, which is native to the computer, I assume (and is a native of HDTV), because it is "recommended" setting windows I tried other resolutions without success, at some resolutions of the Office does extend as far beyond the borders of the HDTV, but no resolution, I can get a full view of the desktop. I went through the menu of the HDTV, and there are no settings that affect the problem. I think I saw something, somewhere has said how to solve this problem the first time I plugged the computer laptop to this HDTV (in this context), that the Office has been shown correctly after you follow the instructions on the popup dialog box, or any that I have seen this information) , but now I am facing this problem with no instruction on how to fix the problem at this time. A screenshot shows the entire office, not only what I see on the HDTV screen.

    After having said all that, I found that a resolution of 1600 x 900 puts the entire desktop on the screen, but it has very thin black borders and the text is so small I can barely read. Also at this resolution, screen appears nervous, but I can't change the Hz, who looks like 50 Hz or 60 Hz, it is too small and the text is indistinct. I don't think that I couldn't bear to look at the screen for a long time at this resolution.

    What intrigues me the most is that it worked the first time I'm connected. I have also a desktop connected to the HDTV, but by the VGA connector and the resolution, it is set at 1280 x 720 native resolution of the HDTV and the office is very well, printing is clearly readable and there is no jitteryness.

    TV is designed to "overscan" the area of the input signal.  This is why video editors must ensure that labels and legends fit within the "security of title area.

    Some TV designed to be used as product views or big screens (for example the retail stores) have options to disable overscan, but most of the consumption patterns are not.
    Your best bet is to use the "native resolution" of television, or the exact number of points, he did, so that he doesn't have to stretch or scale the image.  Sometimes your graphic card has overscan settings options too.  I know with certainty that most model ATI video cards do.  To access it, right click on your desktop and go to the resolution of the screen, then click the advanced settings link.
  • Asymmetric encryption of the symmetric encryption

    I read through a few documents and see that IPsec uses asymmetric key cryptography in Phase 1 to create SAs ike and encryption to the symmetric key for IPsec security associations that are data in bulk.

    Please can someone confirm if this is true. What key (symmetric key or asymmetric) set for pre shared key counterpart specific belngs to.

    Thanks in advance

    Following a simple rule: whenever userdata must be protected, symmetric cryptography is used because it is built for this task and is much faster then asymmetric crypto. Asymmetric cryptography is not built to protect large amounts of data.

    With this, IPsec security associations use only the symmetric algorithms to protect data.

    For Phase 1, it depends on how authentication is performed.

    If you are using PSK and ROUTER1 wants to authenticate ROUTER2, there are the following (slightly simplified) process:

    1. R1 sends a nonce to R2. It is essentially a random number.
    2. R2 takes this value for single use, axe with the PSK and sends the result to R1.
    3. R1 uses its own generated nonce and the PSK and also calculates a hash.
    4. If the received hash and the local calculation are the same, R1 knows that R2 has made the calculation with the Nuncio as R1 provided and used the same PSK R1: R2 is authenticated.
    5. In IPsec, these authentication is done each other, also R2 authenticates R1.

    No asymmetric cryptography is involved when PSK is used which allows fast enough treatment.

    If you use digital certificates for authentication (rsa - sig in the config method) the following happens (even simpler):

    1. R1 sends a nonce to R2. This single value gets axe and the hash is encrypted with the private key of R2s (here we have asymmetric cryptography). If a hash is encrypted with a private key, the result is called a digital signature.
    2. The signature is returned to R1.
    3. R1 uses the R1 certificate to prove the correctness of the signature which is again an asymmetric cryptographic operation. Prior to this, the received certificate has be validated which also has one ore more Asymmetric cryptographic operations.
    4. And the same thing happens the other way around.

    With authentication using digital certificates we have asymmetric cryptography.

    In addition, he is also asymmetric cryptography when DH calculates keymaterial for session keys.

  • Proof of encryption for the DMVPN Tunnel

    I've been setting up VPN for a short time and Im trying to get a better

    understanding of mechanics.

    I configured DMVPN between a router HQ and two branches. Im running eigrp between routers by gre tunnel interfaces. I can see neighbors eigrp via the tunnel which is good. The part is Im trying to understand, I have not created any ACL and I seem to form relationships neighbor eigrp in the tunnels. If I ping or telnet from the HQ router to one of the branches, I assume that Im going through the tunnel and the traffic is encrypted. I would like to be able to prove and to see evidence.

    I have to have ACL is configured to tell the router what to encrypt? Or the fact that the tunnel has a profile applied crypto doesn't take care of it?

    I did a test and telneted from Headquarters to Division 1 to aid private addresses that were sent through the tunnel and then entered the command

    SH crypto ipsec his. My telnet source address is the closure of the router which is 172.22.3.1 I though I'd see 172.22.3.1 or 172.22.1.1 in the out command has turned down and I do not have that make me wonder if the traffic is being encryption. Maybe my configs are incorrect or I need a different show command?

    I have attached my router configs also. If someone could help understand me a little more it would be appreciated.

    Andy

    Lab-HQ-rtr #telnet 172.22.1.1 it's Branch1rtr
    172.22.1.1 by train... Open

    User access audit

    Username: andrewb
    Password:

    Lab-branch1-rtr #sh crypto ipsec his

    Interface: Tunnel0
    Tag crypto map: addr Tunnel0-head-0, local 50.50.50.1

    protégé of the vrf: (none)
    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (50.50.50.1/255.255.255.255/47/0) * thought I'd see the src and dst the telnet address *

    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (50.50.50.3/255.255.255.255/47/0)
    current_peer 50.50.50.3 port 500
    LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},
    #pkts program: 14307, #pkts encrypt: 14307, #pkts digest: 14307
    #pkts decaps: 14286, #pkts decrypt: 14286, #pkts check: 14286
    compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
    #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0
    #pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
    #send 24, #recv errors 0

    local crypto endpt. : 50.50.50.1, remote Start crypto. : 50.50.50.3
    Path mtu 1500, mtu 1500 ip, ip mtu IDB Serial0/0/0
    current outbound SPI: 0x61D48BA8 (1641319336)

    SAS of the esp on arrival:
    SPI: 0x555FD9F (89521567)
    transform: esp-3des esp-sha-hmac.
    running parameters = {Transport}
    Conn ID: 2037, flow_id: VPN:37 on board, card crypto: head-Tunnel0-0
    calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4598507/3044)
    Size IV: 8 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Status: ACTIVE

    the arrival ah sas:

    SAS of the CFP on arrival:

    outgoing esp sas:
    SPI: 0x61D48BA8 (1641319336)
    transform: esp-3des esp-sha-hmac.
    running parameters = {Transport}
    Conn ID: 2038, flow_id: VPN:38 on board, card crypto: head-Tunnel0-0
    calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4598507/3033)
    Size IV: 8 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Status: ACTIVE

    outgoing ah sas:

    outgoing CFP sas:
    Lab-branch1-rtr #.

    Lab-HQ-rtr #sh ip route
    C 50.50.50.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0/0
    172.22.0.0/16 is variably divided into subnets, 4 subnets, 2 masks
    C 172.22.3.1/32 is directly connected, Loopback0
    D 172.22.2.1/32 [90/2944000] via 192.168.254.2, 21:18:04, Tunnel0
    D 172.22.1.1/32 [90/2944000] via 192.168.254.1, 21:19, Tunnel0
    D 172.22.64.32/27 [90/2816256] via 192.168.254.2, 21:18:04, Tunnel0
    [90/2816256] via 192.168.254.1, 21:18:04, Tunnel0
    10.0.0.0/24 is divided into subnets, 5 subnets
    D 10.10.10.0 [90/2816256] via 192.168.254.1, 21:19, Tunnel0
    D 10.10.20.0 [90/2816256] via 192.168.254.1, 21:19, Tunnel0
    D 10.10.30.0 [90/2816256] via 192.168.254.2, 21:18:04, Tunnel0
    D 10.10.40.0 [90/2816256] via 192.168.254.2, 21:18:04, Tunnel0
    D 10.10.50.0 [90/2816256] via 192.168.254.1, 21:19:02, Tunnel0
    C 192.168.254.0/24 is directly connected, Tunnel0
    C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0

    IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association
    status of DST CBC State conn-id slot
    50.50.50.3 50.50.50.2 QM_IDLE 1002 ASSETS 0
    50.50.50.3 50.50.50.1 QM_IDLE 1001 ASSETS 0

    Hi Andy,.

    DMVPN will use routing to control this traffic will be encrypted. You can add ACLs as the regular crypto-plan to specify the traffic of interest, but which is not must have.

    When the traffic leaving the router, it will do the routing research first; If the next hop points on your tunnel interface and the traffic is encapsulated and encrypted; If the next hop points to another interface, the traffic will leave the router without encryption.

    ISAKMP SAs are built between your tunnel end points, as see you in the output of "show isakmp crypto his." You can check the traffic was encrypted or not by looking at the
    #pkts program: 14307, #pkts encrypt: 14307, #pkts digest: 14307
    #pkts decaps: 14286, #pkts decrypt: 14286, #pkts check: 14286

    If you really want to see the package, you can EXTEND it to a monitor station traffic.

    HTH,

    Lei Tian

  • Disable encryption of the user export packages

    Hello

    When you try to import users, we get an error to v6.2.  The error indicates that addictive "-unspecified" is missing.  We believe that it is P4P enveloping the error in a kind of error handling, because we have all the data related to the user called "-unspecified" from what we can tell.  We have disabled the encryption for the export packages so we can see what is happening, but that covers only exports ADMN, not export UGM, apparently.  Is it possible to disable encryption for exports of the UGM as well?

    Thank you

    Drew

    Yes, this configuration covers only exports ADMN but not UGM exports. Have you checked "-not specified ' value of the user interface? What country or group field?

  • Lightroom CC 2015 11 x 17 prints beyond the right margin - Epson Expression XP-906

    In another thread of printing problem 11 x 17, I saw that the original question has not been addressed and that others appeared to have my problem have been add to the discussion, they seem related problems with print 11 x 17, but not the same exact problem. Here's my problem. Thanks in advance for reading.

    It is a newer version of 6 color Epson all in one printer, and exit 11 x 17 look nice. However with the latest drivers and 10 Windows and Mac Book os X when I put in place to print a 11 x 17, every time, printing continues beyond the right margin. With margins 0.25 in. and cell size 10.50 height and width 16.50, my image extends approximately 0.125 in. beyond the right margin line. When I'm saying, I mean the short edge that is not inserted in the printer to start a unique landscape of 11 x 17 print. I took the suggestions of the other thread using a Lightroom color management profile, reduced to fit, stretch to fit, use margins without borders and always set to nothing does not. Mac and Windows 10.

    I'm out of the idea and the Epson Ultra Premium Luster is expensive for just to try this or that... Anyone have the same printer, or delivers and solve it?

    Once again thank you for taking the time.

    Concerning

    Jason C

    I think I found my problem in my manual.

    I've always used Epson presentation matte paper, which comes in "11 × 17 inches (279 x 432 mm)."

    The new document I'm working on Epson Ultra Premium Luster Photo paper is real paper A3 "A3 (11.7 × 16.5 inches [297 × 420 mm])."

    I guess that (Yes for sure me) once I put the size of the paper correctly, it will be printed within the margins of model.

    Oops.

    Jason C

  • Part masking of a jpg that extends beyond the edges of the document?

    Hi all

    Trying to get my head ' around a good workflow in PS.

    Here's the scenario:

    I created a document with an A4 size.

    I import a large (larger than A4) jpg on a layer.

    I only use a very small part of the jpg and hide the rest, I have to go ahead and do this.

    BUT! When, after creating the mask, I begin to move the layer autour, I noticed that the created mask extended only insofar as the borders of the A4 document, therefore the jpg areas that are found beyond the A4 are were not masked.

    So when I move the layer around, these no hidden boxes appear on the sides.

    So what (I guess) I ask basically, is: How do I create a mask that affects the entire layer and not just areas that appears with the borders of document?

    Thank you very much! ......... D

    Start with layer > layer mask > hide all.

  • beyond the image mask color

    I often have people mask images to put them in an architectural setting. I so everything first open the image with a person, to convert the bottom of layer 0, add a layer mask and paint around the person with the black.

    When I drag this layer to another then (enlargement), the mask around the person is black only as much as the original image size image of this person. around him he is white. When the scaling this image + mask, a thin frame appears sometimes, while the outer edge of pixel is interpolated and not completely black more. This must be retouched every time.

    now, by chance, I did it 'right', in the sense that when you drag the image of the little person, the mask was completely black around the person. so there must be a way to make things right from the beginning. I tried to find what I have done in history, but the last 20 acts were brushing.

    Anyone know how I can put the entire area of a layer beyond the borders of the image mask to black? I tried, but did not work:

    activate the layer mask, select all, reverse, fill it with black (cmd + backspace when bg color is black).

    I found a solution that works, but it's more complicated than the contours of the new layout of the image-editing.

    Thank you.

    Wim

    I know exactly what you talk about and very glad you posted this.

    What works is if you start with a new layer with no mask. Then draw a rough selection lasso around your object, then click adding a layer mask icon.

    What also works is hold the option key before clicking on the Add layer mask button. Your mask is filled with black, then paint to keep the areas with a white brush.

    What causes the problem is if you click on add a layer mask button and then start to use the brush to paint the areas.

    It has to do with, if you helped photoshop know what color the mask is filled beyond your exisitng Web.

  • Impossible to go beyond the lock screen

    My wife and I are unable to go beyond the lock screen today. It's an iphone 6s and 7 times iphone running iOS 10. At the same time happened when we returned in the evening. When we enter the password, the screen freezes / hangs. Then, a minute or so later, it looks like to reboot the phone or reboot UI. then return to the lock screen. This is crazy. I feel like we're pirated! What is happening to someone else? Two of us do not have access to our phones!

    Have you tried a reboot?

    Reset?

    Restore?

  • I need my iPhone 5 to numbers automatically several times a month to keep my number as I am out of the country

    IPhone 5

    I want the phone to make a call by month automatically while I'm out of the country to keep my phone number.

    This seems unusual to me. Why and who do you call to keep your phone number? Do you take your phone with you when you travel? Just set up a reminder that you make the call. I'm not aware of any way to have the phone to make the call. Should what type of response you do when you get that call? I don't see how having the phone automatically call a number no response after that the call would end would solve anything.

  • Why am I UNABLE TO CHECK NAME or PASSWORD I was out of the country recently.  Connection?  Thank you.

    I was out of the country recently and I had a pop window asking me to type my password for an e-mail account.  I did nothing, didn't get into while I was absent and e-mail continued to work until just at the time, about 24 hours. After my return.

    Maybe, I need to rest overnight, but would appreciate input.

    Thank you.

    Hey BrownChair,

    Thank you for using communities Support from Apple. We can see in your message that you receive a "cannot verify the name of the account...". "error message when you use your computer. We understand the importance of being able to access your email and we would be happy to provide you with advice for this problem. If it is in reference to your iCloud account, the following link has a series of steps for various issues that you may experience when you use your troubleshooting iCloud account.

    iCloud: Troubleshooting account

    Let us know if that helps.

    Kind regards.

  • Why can't I enter the country code of my phone number for the 2-step verification process?

    I just upgrade my iPhone 6 to 10.0.2. In the home screen, you asked me to provide my phone number to register in the system of validation in 2 steps. However, + 82 (South Korea) is not on your scrolling list.

    https://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=aPFbPt3KGqY

    Hey aramkim80,

    I see from your post that you are not able to enter the country code for the South Korea when setting up for your Apple ID security two-step verification of your Apple ID as much as possible is always a good thing, so I understand your concern.

    Take a look at this article: frequently asked questions about two steps checking of Apple ID. This article presents a list of countries is available in two-step verification. I do not see the Korea of the South on the list of countries currently supported, it's why you're not able to do this.

    Hope that answered this question for you.

    See you soon.

Maybe you are looking for