IPSEC tunnels are trying the connection

I have a 5510 and a 5505 I'm trying to set up a simple VPN tunnel above. I tried CISCO configs ASA form of patterns step by step, as well as all the sources I can find. I've walked through the config with the IOS commands, but also of the assistants. All my packages are lost to the inside or the outside interface.

When I show SH ISAKMP command all get them are 0s right down. Any ideas how I can troubleshoot-done it

Try the following on the 5505 (assuming that your object groups are compatible with the example in configs)

outside_1_cryptomap to access extended list ip 192.168.5.0 allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.13.0 255.255.255.0

NAT (inside, outside) static static source NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.13.0_24 destination NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.5.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.5.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.13.0_24

Try this on the ASA 5510

access extensive list ip 192.168.13.0 outside_1_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0

NAT (inside, outside) static static source NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.5.0_24 destination NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.13.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.13.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.5.0_24

Thank you

Tarik Admani
* Please note the useful messages *.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • IPSec tunnel between a client connection mobility and WRV200

    Someone has set up an IPSec tunnel between a client connection mobility and WRV200? I can't get the right configuration.

    Agitation, these products are treated by the Cisco Small Business support community. Please refer to the URL: https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/small-business

  • "" My internet connection is constantly down and back on the error "negotiating IPsec year failure prevents the connection.

    Original title: The IPsec negotiation failure prevents the connection

    My internet connection is constantly visitor drop-off and restarted, and when I troubleshoot I get this message "the IPsec negotiation failure prevents the connection." I don't use VPN or anything so I have no idea what it means. I restarted the router several times. Any other ideas?

    Hello

    1. you are using a wired or a wireless connection?

    2. If it works well before?

    3 did you changes to the computer before the show?

    Method 1: Reset the router and see if that helps.

    Note: To help you reset the router, you can consult the manual that came with the router or the router contact manufacturer.

    Method 2: Uninstall and reinstall the NIC drivers and see if that helps.

    See the following steps:

    (a) click Start, right click on computer.

    (b) click on properties, click on Device Manager

    (c) expand the network card, right-click the wireless adapter option

    (d) click on uninstall

    (e) now go to your computer/wireless device manufacturer's website, download the updated drivers and install them.

    Reference:

    Updated a hardware driver that is not working properly:

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/update-a-driver-for-hardware-that-isn ' t-work correctly

  • Demand blackBerry smartphones is understood, but it was denied. "When you are trying to connect

    When I use twitter on the device, this is the message I get "the request is understood, but it has been denied." when trying to connect to Can someone let me know how or what I neeed to do this, I can access my twitter account

    Happened to me yesterday too.  I checked the edits, there wasn't one, installed and all was well again.

  • I get an error code 80070005 when all users outside of the administrator are trying to connect to the Internet.

    On a recently purchased HP laptop, access to internet and "computer" are blocked and trigger an error 80070005 Windows for all users other than the administrator. Is there a solution?

    Original title: error 80070005 blocking internet connection (and more) for all users other than the administrator.

    Hi tired of flamel,

     

    Thank you for keeping us posted.

    Glad to know that the problem is solved. Do not hesitate to contact Microsoft Windows Forums for issues related to Windows in the future.

  • IM stops working after a minute or two - troubleshooting explains internet connection problems found (the IPsec negotiation failure prevents the connection)

    Need to patch to get IPsec to start working in Internet instant Mesasenger - I fought this for about 3 months. I can't do a Messenger call for more than a minute before having to re - connect - it's driving me crazy - fix your product - Paul * address email is removed from the privacy *.  Settings information (network security) Diagnostics that can block connections:

    filter name: Messaging microsoft instant - name for the provider context: windows Instant Messenger - provider name: Microsoft Corp.Provider - description: Microsoft Windows Firewall: IPsec provider

    Hi paulrhea,
     
    -What version of the operating system are you using?
    -You are able to go online with no problems?
    -Have you been able to use the Messenger without any problem before?
     
    If you use Windows 7 or Windows Vista, follow the suggestion given here.
     
    Try to disable the firewall for the moment and check if it helps fix the problem.
     

    If the problem is resolved, you may need to contact the manufacturer of the program for the settings that can be changed or if there are other updates for this program.

    Note: Firewall can keep the computer worm, pirates etc. Therefore, be sure to turn on the firewall once you are finished with the test.

    If it is Windows Firewall, see the article below:

    Allow a program to communicate through Windows Firewall

    Additional reference on:

    Windows Firewall is blocking a program

  • How to configure ASA5520 of Checkpoint IPsec tunnel configuration

    Hi guys and under tension, a lot of it!

    I have a problem, I set up an IPsec tunnel between my ASA5520 at a Checkpoint Firewall (PE) CONFIG below (not true FT)

    network of the ASA_MAPPED object

    4.4.4.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

    network of the CHECKPOINT_MAPPED object

    5.5.5.5.0 SUBNET 255.255.255.0

    OUT_CRYPTO extended access list permit ip object ASA_MAPPED object CHECKPOINT_MAPPED

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ikev1 CHECKPOINT_SET aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

    destination NAT (INSIDE, OUTSIDE) static source ALLNETWORKS(10.0.0.0/16) ASA_MAPPED CHECKPOINT_MAPPED of CHECKPOINT_MAPPED static

    NAT (INSIDE, OUTSIDE) source of destination ALLNETWORKS(10.0.0.0/16) static ASA_MAPPED static 4.4.4.11 5.5.5.11

    card crypto OUTSIDE_MAP 5 corresponds to the address OUT_CRYPTO

    OUTSIDE_MAP 5 set crypto map peer X.X.X.X

    card crypto OUTSIDE_MAP 5 set transform-set CHECKPOINT_SET ikev1

    card crypto OUTSIDE_MAP 5 defined security-association life seconds 3600

    CHECKPOINT_MAP interface card crypto OUTSIDE

    tunnel-group X.X.X.X type ipsec-l2l

    tunnel-group ipsec-attributes X.X.X.X

    IKEv1 pre-shared-key 1234

    ISAKMP crypto 10 nat-traversal

    Crypto ikev1 allow outside

    IKEv1 crypto policy 10

    preshared authentication

    aes encryption

    sha hash

    Group 5

    life 86400

    IPsec Tunnel is in place and I can access the server on the other side via the beach of NATTED, for example a server behind the checkpoint with the IP 10.90.55.11 is accessible behind the ASA as 4.4.4.11, the problem is that I have never worked on a Checkpoint Firewall and servers/Server 4.4.4.11 that I can't connect to my environment to that checkpoint is configured with a Tunnel interface that is also supposed to to make NAT because of the superimposition of networks, at one point, I added an access to an entire list and bidirectional routing has been reached, but I encountered a new problem, I could not overlook from my servers public became unaccessecable, since all traffic was encrypted and get dropped to VPN: ipsec-tunnel-flow... for now the Tunnel is up and I can access the server via NAT 4.4.4.11, but can't access my internal servers. What did I DO WRONG (also, I don't have access to the Checkpoint Firewall (PE)) how their installation would be or how it should be to allow bidirectional routing?

    ========================================================

    Tag crypto map: CHECKPOINT_MAP, seq num: 5, local addr: X.X.X.X

    Access extensive list ip 4.4.4.0 OUT_5_CRYPTO allow 255.255.255.0 5.5.5.0 255.255.255.0

    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (4.4.4.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)

    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (5.5.5.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)

    current_peer: X.X.X.X

    #pkts program: 3207, #pkts encrypt: 3207, #pkts digest: 3207

    #pkts decaps: 3417, #pkts decrypt: 3417, #pkts check: 3417

    compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0

    #pkts uncompressed: 3207, model of #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0

    success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0

    Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0

    #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

    local crypto endpt. : X.X.X.X/0, remote Start crypto. : X.X.X.X/0

    Path mtu 1500, fresh ipsec generals 74, media, mtu 1500

    current outbound SPI: 5254EDC6

    current inbound SPI: 36DAB960

    SAS of the esp on arrival:

    SPI: 0x36DAB960 (920303968)

    transform: aes - esp esp-sha-hmac no compression

    running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel}

    slot: 0, id_conn: 19099648, crypto-card: CHECKPOINT_MAP

    calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (3914999/3537)

    Size IV: 16 bytes

    support for replay detection: Y

    Anti-replay bitmap:

    0 x 00000000 0x0000000F

    outgoing esp sas:

    SPI: 0x5254EDC6 (1381297606)

    transform: aes - esp esp-sha-hmac no compression

    running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel}

    slot: 0, id_conn: 19099648, crypto-card: CHECKPOINT_MAP

    calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (3914999/3537)

    Size IV: 16 bytes

    support for replay detection: Y

    Anti-replay bitmap:

    0x00000000 0x00000001

    unless I include any any on my access-list and the problem with that is  that my Public servers then get encrypted from the OUTSIDE interface  unless you know of a way to bypass the VPN

    No, u certainly shouldn't allow 0.0.0.0 for proxy ACL. Again, your config is very good. In addition, package account, this show that traffic is going throug the tunnel in two ways:

    #pkts program: 3207

    #pkts decaps: 3417

    Also, looking at the meter, I can guess that some of the traffic comes from the other site, but does not return back (maybe that's where you can not connect from behing Checkpoint). If you say that 0.0.0.0 solved the problem, are there no other NAT rules for subnet behind ASA, so the server IP, for which you are trying to connect behind the checkpoint, translates into something else (not the beach, included in proxy ACL), when to come back?

  • Windows PE and 7 clients trying to connect to servers on port UDP 500

    We have a lot of nie on our internal firewall from various machines in our area who are trying to connect to servers on port UDP 500 that are fill newspapers on the firewall. Servers usually aren't domain controllers, some are Terminal Server servers and one our imaging Server (LANDesk). Clients fail to connect to the VPN either. We do not use IPSEC anywhere in their own country.

    It seems that UDP500 traffic is generated when accessing other services on the server such as RDP or file-sharing, not all clients are and stop the IKE and AuthIP IPsec Keying Modules service on the client seems to stop packets. So I think I know what it does but I don't know why. I have some screenshots of our managed service provider package and connected remotely to a system running Windows PE, looked with TCPView and valid traffic that packages stop when the IKE and AuthIP IPsec Keying Modules service is stopped. I do not think its malware.

    I'm really excited to know what mechanism is causing these packages and knowledge if we accept it or not.

    Any advice would be much appreciated.

    Thank you

    Paul

    Paul


    This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN

    http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  • Configuration of a timeout for an IPSEC tunnel

    With a VPN connection from site to site between two Cisco 837 s, is it possible that I can set up the IPSEC tunnel to be razed after a period of inactivity and, then, the tunnel is built again when more traffic is passed?

    Hi mitchen

    A sense (but probably not what you're looking for), to "timeout" the IPSEC Session is to use the SA IPSEC-life expectancy.

    If the connection is still required (crypto acl are triggered) the connection will be restored, otherwise it will be demolished.

    HIS life is without delay of inactivity but it is used to "re-authenticate/restore / offer more security" for the IPSEC tunnel on a regular basis.

    With a "Newer" IOS, there is a feature called:

    seconds of downtime ipsec crypto - security association

    This can be created or specified by peers worldwide.

    You will find all the details here:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/SW/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide09186a00801541d4.html#wp1027129

    "Remember messages useful rate."

    Greetings

    Jarle

    Greetings

    Jarle

  • Tine Capsule loses the connection to iMac on El Capitan

    So I thought to myself - allows to change Windows XP for IMac OS - X and I liked the theory behind Time Capsule.  So in Dec 15 bought the new iMac with El-Capitan installed - very nice - steep to overcome - but very nice learning curve.  In January 2016, I bought the capsule and time the iMac continues to lose track of it and the backup fails.

    I read a lot of posts on this problem with earlier versions of Mac OS x, but none with El Capitan.  I tried many suggestions.  I'm willing to stick to this, but concluded that Apple have big network problems - is there any known firm resolution that I missed

    If I unplug power of TC and plug it again TC restarts and fix the link and he stays for a while, but when the iMac system sleeps it seems to lose track of the TC.  The TC continues to work as a hub WiFi in bridge in the whole mode, although the link of TC - Mac itself is ethernet.

    I have the network as [router ISP-> switch-> TC-> IMac].  I have a PC, NAS, hooked to the switch and the printer off the TC - all (other than the iMac/TC) connections continue to work all the time (even the printer connected through the CT.

    Suggestions for things to try would be useful, but nobody knows if Apple are working on it?

    is there a known strong resolution that I missed

    No, it's still coming every day in the posts here.

    Apple tries to do new things via DNS and she has so far trained more than problems solved... It has to do with the hand and swapping the standard network structure and network on equal terms with the iphone or ipad. At least as far as I know. Don't hold me to him as we all users here... and some of the information Apple provide are extremely sketchy.

    I tried many suggestions.

    It is difficult to make suggestions that we really have no idea what you tried... I'll post a link to my standard list below...

    BUT el capo has introduced different bugs... and I find it hard to reproduce... Note that I have not really had most of the questions are people here. I do not use the TC in bridge... but actually force it to take in charge the functions of dhcp for these devices that connect directly to it... and you have TO connect the Mac directly to the CT... He got buried... I'm usually carefully noted the location... but Apple said you need on the computer directly connected to the TC... If it is ethernet or wireless is not a problem... but if you are trying to connect to the switch or the main router, it is not a good idea.

    So, I would recommend that you try this method.

    Re: time capsule Airport Guard disconnection

    There are screenshots of it... and if all that is hard to follow if you please tell me where you are stuck.

    I found I can now exchange the main router with a degree of immunity, as I reconfigure the DHCP and IP LAN on it to match my setup of origin... it's not hard... but it may take some time to wrap your mind around it.

    In fact right now I use a secondary antibody Airport extreme as a WAP browser on the primary... again to help people having to abandon the questions... and I have so far after that many days are perfectly stable.

    If you can do it... change the domain in the main router at the local level

    Maybe it's nothing or it could be something else, such as lan. So in fact, all your names are the. But if the main router uses a field other than mess a few things... Apple seems also is recommended to use the TC as the main router as preferable to the bridge... They recommend same NAT double bridge... IMHO, my static IP method solves the problem, where you can not replace the main router, and the TC regularly loses on the network...

  • I am trying to connect to a site web I have bee on several times and get an error code 10061

    I received an error code 10061 he States, "when the server gateway or proxy contacted the connection was refused, this is usually to try to connect to a service that is not active on the top stream server.

    Hello

    1. which version of the Windows operating system is installed on your computer?

    2. which site you are trying to connect to?

    3. what web browser do you use? (Internet Explorer, Firefox, etc.)

    4. what version of IE are you using?

    I suggest you to refer to the following Microsoft article and check if it helps.

    "Connection Refused" Message connecting to IIS server: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/272494

    Hope the information is useful.

  • WiFi, tries to connect but do not. No error. Work on other machines

    Yes I saw this sticky.

    1 5 PCs stopped connecting to the WiFi router. He had worked for a while. The SSID is listed as "automatic". Click on connect and it runs for minutes before stopping without error message. Nothing is displayed in the event viewer. Virus scan says own. I can run an Ethernet cable to it and it will work. It happened during a month. Because it is used occasionally by a 9 year old child I let go. Another computer is now too from Saturday. We ran on the second PC Ethernet cable and it will work. Recently the 9 year old had used this computer for school work. His computer (a 1st) worked very well until some time after starting his homework on it. Of course, it could be something else. It is now two machines not connect is not without error. Could be related to something he does inadvertently.

    Any ideas on troubleshooting?

    Once you connect to a wireless network, the connection details are often recorded as a 'profile' in your wireless network application and re-used the next time the wireless network is met.  If this profile has been changed somehow, the default information collected may not be sufficient to authenticate on the subject at a later date.

    Look in your system tray for your wireless internet application, double-click on it or otherwise run it on the screen.  Find a 'Profiles' button and open the window profiles.  Then, remove all the profiles you see here such that it is no longer a story for a connection attempt.  At a minimum, remove the profile that is associated with the SSID that you are trying to connect to.  After that, try to re-scan and reconnect to your network.

    HTH,
    JW

  • How to force the connection sharing network and update password for the partnership offline synchronization of existing file?

    I use Windows 7.  When I connect to my VPN, I sync to a network folder.  I have an existing installation of offline file partnership to synchronize.  Often, it takes a while after that I connect to my VPN for Windows in order to get account I am connected and are trying to connect to the network share where the "synchronization of offline files" option, likewise, becomes available.  I have no way to force a try.  I tried to leave the computer at night and it connects.

    The other problem is that it means that I can't access all the folders not synchronized because when I try to connect to the network share server, it only shows the files offline.  He's not trying to connect to the real server.

    Now, I have a new problem.  I changed the password on the server.  Now when windows determines that the network share is available to sync, and I try to sync, I receiver a sync about login/password error.

    1. is there a way to force windows to try to connect to the share?

    2. How can I change the password saved?

    Hello

    Thanks for posting your question on the Forum of the Microsoft community.

    The question will be better suited to the audience of it professionals on the TechNet forums.

    I would recommend posting your query in the TechNet Forums.
     
    TechNet Forum
    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?category=w7itpro

    Thank you

  • DefaultL2LGroup keeps trying to connect to an old IP address

    Hi all

    We have a Cisco ASA 5510, who had a VPN tunnel established with the connection of the previous home network administrator.  When he resigned, we have removed the tunnel-group.  I noticed, though, in the newspapers, that can still be seen:

    4 December 28, 2014 07:51:26           Group = DefaultL2LGroup, IP = x.x.x.x, FAULT, had decrypt packets, probably due to problems not match pre-shared key. Abandonment

    Where the x.x.x.x is the IP the guy. I tried grepping its IP in a show run and all I found were an acl entry.  Is it possible to get DefaultL2LGroup to stop trying to restore this tunnel?

    Thank you!

    Given that you see

    ERROR, had problems decrypting package

    I would say that its configuration is still trying to send you encrypted packets.

  • IPsec tunnel ACLs

    If I create a card encryption there is the address for correspondence control (acl). My question is; This acl sets the only traffic that is allowed in the tunnel or will other types of traffic that are allowed in the tunnel and all simply not encrypted.

    Hi Chris and Daniel,

    All traffic authorized by the crypto acl will be led by the IPSec tunnel.

    The rest of the traffic will not use the tunnel, but is passed by the link.

    "license ip any any" is allowed on crypto as on any other ACL ACL. Its use depends on how you want to define your valuable traffic.

    Cheers:

    István

Maybe you are looking for