Is it possible to put behind a NAT DMVPN hub? (Speaks has a public IP address)

I he tried for a few days and couldn't make it work. The schema and configuration is in the attachment.

Crypto isakmp profile: QM slowed down on both sides.

Profile of crypto ipsec: NO ipsec profile established on both sides.

Show ip PNDH (side hub): nothing is saved at all. Empty.

Any ideas?

Thank you!

Difan

As long as the HUB has a static nat translation it should work, try to set your transformation mode of Transport rather than tunnel on two spokes and hub, close your tunnel on the hub and the spokes and then turn it back on, does make a difference?

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Static NAT & DMVPN Hub

    Hello

    I don't think that will be a problem DMVPN supports the rays behind NAT devices, but I anticipate change my network for reasons of security and redudancy autour and putting a pair of ASA firewalls on my Internet collocation.  Right now I have a DMVPN race 3845, NAT & ZBFW.  I'm going to remove the ZBFW and move the NAT to the ASA, leaving only the DMVPN hub and routing.  If I create a static NAT mapping on my ASA to point to the DMVPN hub that will work?

    I think it will be, but I just wanted to be 110% sure.

    Thank you!

    Hi Brantley,

    DMVPN with static NAT on the hub is supported in the installer. Just be awear it there are limits.

    1, all DMVPN router, hub and spokes must be running at least 12.3(9a) and 12.3 (11) T code.

    2, must use ipsec transport mode.

    3, so need dynamic tunnel talk to rays, hub should work at least 12.3 (13), 12.3 (14) T and 12.3 (11) T3 code.

    See the configuration guide

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/guide/sec_DMVPN_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1122466

    HTH,

    Lei Tian

  • Site to Site VPN Possible behind routers NAT on both ends?

    Nice day

    After extensive research I have not found an answer so I turn to the community.

    I'm trying to help a friend facility a VPN but it's a scenario that I have not dealt and hope that someone has.

    Here's the basic scheme;

    Site 1 - 172.16.23.0/24

    Site 2 - 172.16.24.0/24

    (Site of ASA 1 - router 172.16.23.5) - Linksys w / static public IP - Internet - Linksys router w / static public IP-(ASA Site 2 - 172.16.24.5)

    Is this possible scenario with port forwarding?  The warnings, I need to watch out for?

    I read that I'll need a route to my ASA, say Site 1 ASA, who said... Route 172.16.24.0 255.255.255.0 1.1.1.1 (point to ASA local public IP).

    I also read I'll need one additional lane in my (site 1) linksys router that says... Route 172.16.24.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.23.5 (point to the local interface of the ASA)

    Thanks for all comments and suggestions.

    A

    Hi Adam,.

    You are right with a port forwarding, you can create an IPSEC tunnel, even if NAT is present on both ends.

    Also, NAT - T is a feature enabled by default on the ASA that automatically detects if the camera is behind a NAT and pass the IPSEC UDP 4500 port. Here is the syntax of the command:

    ASA (config) # crypto isakmp nat-traversal 20

    How NAT - T works

    So, here is a document for your reference build the VPN tunnel:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-next-generation-firewalls/119141-configure-ASA-00.html

    About routing, all traffic will go out of the ASA using intellectual property where the card encryption is applied, routing on linkysys devices just take care that this IP is routed Internet and that there is connection between the 2 ASAs.

    It may be useful

    -Randy-

  • multiple clients behind a NAT IPSec

    In our head office, I have a Pix 515e which acts as our VPN server.

    Several clients at a remote office are requiring VPN access to the corporate network, but can only connect at once. If a second connects the premiera is abandoned.

    I suspect that this is because they are sitting behind a Natted router and all share the same public address.

    When I was installing all first the VPNGroups I read an article that has discussed this problem and offered a solution, but I can't seem to locate it. Is this possible on a 6.3 (4) Version FOS Pix

    Denny,

    Sounds to me that you must enable (on your PIX, config mode):

    > isakmp nat-traversal

    Let me know if this helps and if she please post rates as if you need an explanation on the NAT - T then let me know.

    Jay

  • Is it possible to put a server on the DMZ SQL

    Hi all

    He would ask about the deployment of PIX. Is it possible to put a server on DMZ SQL (or one of 5 exclusion inside the interface interfaces) and simply define a NAT to allow inside the user access to the DMZ? Also without allowing the outside user access to SQL server. We intend to set a SQL on a DMZ server, such that unathourized internal users will not be able to know the actual address of the SQL Server.

    Are there problems which should be considered on this deployment?

    Thanks in advance,

    udimpas

    Hi Udimpas,

    Yes, your scenario is possible. You can put SQL Server on the DMZ network and allow access to inside users. at the same time, you can also block the access from the outside.

    Let's say, your sql IP address is 192.168.1.10 & your home LAN is 10.1.1.0/24. You can do the following:

    NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

    access-list allowed sheep ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 host 192.168.1.10

    by doing this, you have not nat all traffic from your inside sql server. In case you have defined everything inside your network access lists, you must open port 1433.

    list of access within permit udp 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 host 192.168.1.10 eq 1433

    You should not add the ACL above, if you have no restrictions from the inside, from now.

    I hope this helps... all the best...

    REDA

  • Therefore, it is possible to put pictures in group conversations?

    I noticed that you can not set a picture for new group conversations, however it is still possible to put them for much older groups.

    http://community.Skype.com/T5/Mac/I-can-t-change-the-profile-picture-of-my-group-chat/m-p/3188002#M6...

  • Is it possible to put 2 GB of memory in the Portege R500-11 b?

    Hello.
    is it possible to put 2 GB memory in toshiba R500-11 b?
    because by default, there is 1 GB of RAM?

    Thanks in advance!

    Hey!

    Normally, it can be upgraded up to 2 GB memory. Therefore, you need DDR2-667 modules with 200pins.

    You can buy it from each computer store or an authorized service provider. Upgrading RAM is also fairly easy. ;)

  • Is it possible to put a password that would prevent the program turn accidentally closed?

    We have a person in our laboratory which is spirit very scatter. Several times he wanted to reduce Labview program running, but doesn't actually not paid attention and accidentally closed it by clicking X instead of _, thus negating the whole experience. When the program was closed he didn't ask if he wanted to save or if he didn't know that he wanted to close it. Is it possible to put a password that would prevent the program turn accidentally closed?

    You have two options.

    1. You can hide the X in total in the properties of VI.  Go to the appearance of the window, click Customize, and then uncheck the option to allow the user to close the window.  You would need another method, for example a file-> Quit or exit option button.
    2. If you use a version higher than the Base, you can use a structure of the event to capture the narrow window? event.  This will allow you to ask the user to confirm to get out and do something else required.  If the user cancels, or you need to cancel, you have the abaility to cancel the event.
  • Is it possible to put any kind of 'stop' on a netbook stolen to make it unusable by microsoft, or any other way?

    Is it possible to put any kind of 'stop' on a netbook stolen to make it unusable by microsoft, or any other way?

    Since this forum is not for questions about stolen laptops, you don't ask in the right place.

    Unless you load something like LoJack or TrueCrypt beforehand, there is nothing you can do to turn off a laptop flew.  Well, I hope that there is no personal data, like numbers of bank account on this PC.

  • Is it possible to put in place a wake-up call to the PC/computer Windows Vista laptop? Then, he can wake up in the morning.

    Is it possible to put in place a wake-up call to the PC/computer Windows Vista laptop? Then, he can wake up in the morning.

    Hello Xltdnbl,

    Thank you for using the Microsoft Windows Vista Forums.  In Windows Vista, there is not a revival on the operating system, but you can add a.  The site below has different types of alarms that can be added.  You can set the alarm to wake up with the sidebar.

    http://Gallery.live.com/liveItemDetail.aspx?Li=354455a7-0b97-42d7-adb1-09aeebee0c46&BT=1

    Please let me know if this was helpful, or if you're still having problems. Engineer James Microsoft Support answers visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

  • Sourcefire - module behind a nat

    How to configure the module and how it the module is located behind a nat device? That means be id nat?

    Let's say the remote SFR module is 192.168.1.1 and the public ip address is 1.1.1.1. The management center of SFR is 10.10.10.10 and appears as 2.2.2.2 on the internet.

    The nat id is just a value randomly selected and used on both sides?

    What is the configuration for the sourcefire module, configure the Manager add 2.2.2.2 Council nat - id 50000?

    What the MC LICO, 1.1.1.1 Council nat - id 50000?

    The manual of 5.4 in Chapter 4 article 8 (page 128) icover this topic, but I don't think that does it pretty well.

    Thank you

    Rich

    Hello

    Yes you are right. It should work. If the nat works correctly, you should be able to register the sensor with DC.

    Let me know if you get a specific error?

    Kind regards

    Aastha Bhardwaj

    Rate if this is useful!

  • Using Cisco Client to site VPN on a behind a NAT ASA 5520

    I apologize if this has been asked and we answered in the forums.  I looked, and while I found a large number of entries that were dancing all around this question, I never found nothing which addressed this specific issue.   We currently use an ASA 5520 as the head end of a relatively large customer to site IPSEC VPN (approximately 240 users, not consecutively).   This ASA is currently sitting behind a Checkpoint firewall with a real publicly addressable IP address on its public interface.  All of our customers use the legacy Cisco VPN (not the one anyconnect) client.  We plan to a few controllers F5 link set up between ISPS and firewalls.   For VPN connectivity F5 recommends that we NAT IP address (called a broad IP) to point back to a private IP address on the ASA and F5.  My question is, will this work?   I've always heard say that the head of line needed to have a public IP address on this subject because this is what will be placed in packages for the client to respond to.

    For further information, here's what we have now and what we are invited to attend.

    Current

    ISP - router - firewall-fire - ASA (public IP address as endpoint)

    Proposed

    ISP - router - F5 (public IP address as endpoint using a NAT to ASA) - Firewall - ASA (10.X.X.X as its external interface)

    Proposed alternative

    ISP - router - F5 (public IP address as endpoint using a NAT to ASA) - ASA (10.X.X.X as its external interface)

    All thoughts at this moment would be greatly appreciated.   Thank you!

    Hello

    If there is a static NAT one by one on F5 to the external interface of the ASA, then I don't think they would be any problems.
    Because when the client will attempt to connect to IKE to the translated public IP, F5 will redirect the request to ASA outside interface that is configured for the VPN.

    In addition, to ensure the udp500, 4500 and esp is allowed and then you should be good to go.

    HTH

    Concerning
    Mohit

  • DMVPN behind a NAT

    Hello

    is there a way to configure a router as a router spoke, where it doesn't have a PUBLIC IP address?

    It's like this:

    Spoke router-> private-> NAT-> Internet-> DMVPN Hub router router IP

    I tried on 12.3 (14) T7.

    There is no problem to have talks DMVPN behind NAT.

    Empty:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/guide/dmvpn_dt_spokes_b_nat_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1060395

    Usually on a device with State there is no need to allow all ports for inbound traffic.

    However, UDP/500 and UDP/4500 will be required if you use the DMVPN or GRE tunnel protection if you don't protect it with IPsec.

    I suggest trying on a device with a more recent software. 12.4 (15) Tx or 12.4 (24) Tx?

    Marcin

  • Is it possible to put a video during running on the app or an image?

    Is it possible to put a video during running on the app or an image?

    You can't put a video instead of the boot image.

  • Is it possible to put photoshop on a flash drive?

    Is it possible to put Photoshop or software adobe on a flash drive and run it with the ability to save files? If this is the case, wouldn't be Adobe againist service conditions and my plan would be violated? I speak especially if I want to get some work and my primary configuration is a desk top that is not portable. I could run the software on a library computer or a friends laptop?

    I speak especially if I want to get some work and my primary configuration is a desk top that is not portable. I could run the software on a library computer or a friends laptop?

    To run it on the computer of someone else (library or a friend), the only is to install with administrator rights and a compatible operating system as you would on your own computer and activate.

Maybe you are looking for