ISA500 site by site ipsec VPN with Cisco IGR
Hello
I tried a VPN site by site work with Openswan and Cisco 2821 router configuration an Ipsec tunnel to site by site with Cisco 2821 and ISA550.
But without success.
my config for openswan, just FYI, maybe not importand for this problem
installation of config
protostack = netkey
nat_traversal = yes
virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%4:!$RIGHT_SUBNET
nhelpers = 0
Conn rz1
IKEv2 = no
type = tunnel
left = % all
leftsubnet=192.168.5.0/24
right =.
rightsourceip = 192.168.1.2 rightsubnet=192.168.1.0/24 Keylife 28800 = s ikelifetime 28800 = s keyingtries = 3 AUTH = esp ESP = aes128-sha1 KeyExchange = ike authby secret = start = auto IKE = aes128-sha1; modp1536 dpdaction = redΘmarrer dpddelay = 30 dpdtimeout = 60 PFS = No. aggrmode = no Config Cisco 2821 for dynamic dialin: crypto ISAKMP policy 1 BA aes sha hash preshared authentication Group 5 lifetime 28800 ! card crypto CMAP_1 1-isakmp dynamic ipsec DYNMAP_1 ! access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255 ! Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-SHA1 esp - aes esp-sha-hmac crypto dynamic-map DYNMAP_1 1 game of transformation-ESP-AES-SHA1 match address 102 ! ISAKMP crypto key
ISAKMP crypto keepalive 30 periodicals ! life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0.4002 card crypto CMAP_1 ! I tried ISA550 a config with the same constelations, but without suggesting. Anyone has the same problem? And had anyone has a tip for me, or has someone expirense with a site-by-site with ISA550 and Cisco 2821 ipsec tunnel? I can successfully establish a tunnel between openswan linux server and the isa550. Patrick, as you can see on newspapers, the software behind ISA is also OpenSWAN I have a facility with a 892 SRI running which should be the same as your 29erxx. Use your IOS Config dynmap, penny, you are on the average nomad. If you don't have any RW customer you shoul go on IOS "No.-xauth" after the isakmp encryption key. Here is my setup, with roardwarrior AND 2, site 2 site. session of crypto consignment logging crypto ezvpn ! crypto ISAKMP policy 1 BA 3des preshared authentication Group 2 lifetime 28800 ! crypto ISAKMP policy 2 BA 3des md5 hash preshared authentication Group 2 lifetime 28800 ! crypto ISAKMP policy 3 BA 3des preshared authentication Group 2 ! crypto ISAKMP policy 4 BA 3des md5 hash preshared authentication Group 2 ! crypto ISAKMP policy 5 BA 3des preshared authentication Group 2 life 7200 ISAKMP crypto address XXXX XXXXX No.-xauth key XXXX XXXX No.-xauth address isakmp encryption key ! ISAKMP crypto client configuration group by default key XXXX DNS XXXX default pool ACL easyvpn_client_routes PFS ! ! Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac FEAT ! dynamic-map crypto VPN 20 game of transformation-FEAT market arriere-route ! ! card crypto client VPN authentication list by default card crypto VPN isakmp authorization list by default crypto map VPN client configuration address respond 10 VPN ipsec-isakmp crypto map Description of VPN - 1 defined peer XXX game of transformation-FEAT match the address internal_networks_ipsec 11 VPN ipsec-isakmp crypto map VPN-2 description defined peer XXX game of transformation-FEAT PFS group2 Set match the address internal_networks_ipsec2 card crypto 20-isakmp dynamic VPN ipsec VPN ! ! Michael Please note all useful posts Tags: Cisco Support IPsec VPN with Cisco AnyConnect and 1921 ISR G2 router Hello Is it possible to establish a remote access VPN IPSec using Cisco Anyconnect client with router Cisco ISR G2 1921. If someone does share it please the sample configuration. as I've been on this topic since last week a. My Cisco rep recommended I have not try AnyConnect a router ISR or ASR. So I used an Open Source client. Don't say that AnyConnect won't work, just the route I took on my project. I work good known configuration for a 1921 with strongSwan as a Client. It is with IPSEC and IKEV2 using certificates for authentication. Hi all I am trying to create a VPN between a PIX and a Cisco 877W tunnel but can't seem to get the tunnel. When I do a 'sho crypto session"on the Cisco 877, I get, he said session state is declining, then changed to NEGOTIATE DOWN, but it is now down again... Please find attached the configs for both ends... Are there commands to confirm that the tunnel is up other than to try to ping the remote end? I would greatly appreciate any help lift this tunnel. Kind regards REDA Hello Based on the configurations of joined, to do some changes. For example: 1. the isakmp policies do not match on the router and the pix. Make sure the hash group Diffie-Hellman and life correspond on the 877 and pix. 2. the access list for the ipsec traffic must be images of mirror of the other. 3. make sure life of ipsec on the two peers. I hope it helps. Kind regards Arul Rate if this can help. IPSEC VPN with Dynamics to dynamic IP Hello I tried IPSEC VPN with dynamic IP to dynamic (router to router) for some time. But still can not auto-établir the tunnel. Is someone can you please tell me if it is possible to do? If so, please share with me the secret to do work. Thank you! Best regards Rather than the Crypto map, I would use the profile of Crypto. Then, establish you an IPSEC tunnel. The beauty of the profile, is that you can run through it routing protocols, and you do not have to change constantly the cards whenever you change the topology of the network. The "* * *" in the timer event is "minute hour day week month" so "* * *" is updated every minute. In Tunnel destination, it's an IP address, not a hostname that is stored, but when you set it, you can put in a HOST name and it converts to the moment where you configure it to an IP address. So, if you type: config t interface tunnel100 output See the race int tunnel100 It shows: interface Tunnel100 That's why the event handler goes and becomes the destination of tunnel every minute what ever the DDNS says that is the new IP address. I have seen that two of your routers running DDNS. They will have to do this. Local router: crypto ISAKMP policy 1 IP route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.220.9 Change-tunnel-dest applet event handler -------- Remote router: crypto ISAKMP policy 1 IP route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.220.10 Change-tunnel-dest applet event handler Thank you Bert Hello I'll get an ASA 5520, and put it in our main office as a VPN router. also, we have 20 to 25 remote users who need VPN access to HQ. some of them have already Sonicwall TZ-100 and some are already using VPN client. I get a Cisco router for remote users. Could you please let me know which device cisco (Hardware) is better for end users? also, most of them have dynamic IP on their DSL lines. is this ok with Cisco to establish a tunnel with a device that has a dynamic IP address? Thank you Mike Hello To find out which platform would be ideal, please check that: http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html Usually for small offices a 5505 works very well, but it depends on your needs. On the other hand, it does not matter if the remote end has a dynamic IP address, please check that: Thank you. Portu. Please note any workstation that will be useful. Router configuration Cisco for the IPSec VPN with VPN in Windows 7 builtin client Where can I find an example config for IPSec VPN where Windows 7 native client to connect to the Cisco routers. I use the cisco 881w, in this case. Thomas McLeod Native Client Windows supports only L2TP over IPSec. Example at the end of this doc may be enough for you: I've not personally configured L2TP/IPSec on IOS, only on ASA, so cannot be 100% sure that the config in the link works, but the general idea should be ok. ASA IPSEC VPN with public IP dynamic Hey,. I have never deployed IPSEC VPN tunnel using ASA on two sides of a side using public IP dynamic production. I normally deploy VPN Tunnels with both sides using public static IP addresses (not always a public IP address on ASA directly however). So I wonder how stable it works with a static public IP and the other side uses dynamic public IP? Thank you Shuai If you use certificates and psk or main mode and aggressive it will work very well. I have a number of production sites using this method. Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App IPSec VPN with DynDNS host problems after change of address Hi guys,. I have a weird problem on an IOS router. I need to implement IPSec VPN L2L. Because of the security requirements of each site needed a clean pre-shared key. Sites dynamic IP and it's why I use dyndns. ISAKMP crypto key KEY hostname XXXXXXXXXXX.dyndns.org CMAP_1 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map First of all, it works fine, but after the change of IP address it no longer works. Debugging, I discovered that it resolves the new IP address but IPSec attempts to connect to the previous INVESTIGATION period. I tried this on two other IOS, 15.0 and 12.4 This debugging output: 01:02:39.735 Mar 1: IPSEC: addr of Peer Link70 (70.1.1.3) is out of date, triggering DNS I'm building a lab to find a solution for this. The other side is a VPN Linksys router, I tried with an IOS router on both sites also, but I got same results. I tried with DPD, ISAKMP profiles don't... no help. Hi Smailmilak83, Configuration of a static encryption with a specific peer card creates a society of surveillance for the peer. Dns lookup he's now only the first time, he tries to connect, after which it's just going to be her generate a new key. If she would ideally use the value peer in the his and not the config or a dns lookup. So, it is wise to use a dynamic encryption card. Please try to use a dynamic encryption instead of a static map. Although there are some limitations including crypto being initiated only at the other end, we can work around keeping the tunnel directly. Hope that helps. Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App -Please note the solutions. Configure several IPSec VPN between Cisco routers I would like to create multiple ipsec VPN between 3 routers. Before applying it, I would like to check on the config I wrote to see if it works. It's just on RouterA configuration for virtual private networks to RouterB, and RouterC. As you can apply in a cyptomap by interface, I say with the roadmap, that it should be able to manage traffic for both routers. Or is there a better way to do it? RouterA - 1.1.1.1 RouterB - 2.2.2.2 RouterC - 3.3.3.3 RouterA crypto ISAKMP policy 10 BA 3des preshared authentication Group 2 ISAKMP crypto key RouterB address 2.2.2.2 ISAKMP crypto keys RouterC address 3.3.3.3 invalid-spi-recovery crypto ISAKMP ISAKMP crypto keepalive 5 10 periodicals ISAKMP crypto nat keepalive 30 ! life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800 ! Crypto ipsec transform-set AES - SHA esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac ! outsidemap 20 ipsec-isakmp crypto map defined peer 2.2.2.2 game of transformation-AES-SHA match address 222 outsidemap 30 ipsec-isakmp crypto map defined peer 3.3.3.3 game of transformation-AES-SHA match address 333 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0 Description * Internet *. NAT outside IP outsidemap card crypto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 Description * LAN *. IP 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 IP nat inside ! IP nat inside source map route RouterA interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload ! access-list 222 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 223 deny ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 223 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 333 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 3.3.3.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 334 deny ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 3.3.3.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 334 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any ! ! RouterA route map permit 10 corresponds to the IP 223 334 Hi Chris, The two will remain active. The configuration you have is for several ste VPN site is not for the redundant VPN. The config for the redundant VPN is completely different allows so don't confuse is not with it. In the redundant VPN configuration both peers are defined in the same card encryption. Traffic that should be passed through the tunnel still depend on the access list, we call in the card encryption. This access-lsist is firstly cheked and as a result, the traffic is passed through the correct tunnel HTH! Concerning Regnier Please note all useful posts Hello. I work at Sunrise a site to site VPN, but I'm running a problem when I apply the plan of the cry to the external interface. I already have a remote IPSec VPN access to the top with this cry map applied to the external interface. When I apply the plan that I created for the L2L, it will drop the RA VPN when applied to this interface. I was wondering how I can make this work with the two IPSec VPN. Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac IPSec ikev1 Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac ikev1 l2lvpn Crypto dynamic-map IPSecVPNDM 1 set ikev1 IPSec transform-set Crypto-map dynamic IPSecVPNDM 1jeu reverse-road card crypto IPSecVPNCM 1-isakmp dynamic ipsec IPSecVPNDM IPSecVPNCM interface card crypto outside card crypto IPSecL2L 1 corresponds to the address CSM_IPSEC_ACL_1 card crypto IPSecL2L 1 set counterpart x.x.x.x card crypto IPSecL2L 1 set transform-set l2lvpn ikev1 Crypto ca trustpoint ASDM_TrustPoint0 registration auto full domain name no name of the object CN = IPSec-SMU-5505 Configure CRL Crypto ikev1 allow outside IKEv1 crypto policy 1 preshared authentication 3des encryption sha hash Group 2 life 86400 IKEv1 crypto policy 2 preshared authentication 3des encryption sha hash Group 2 life 43200 Thank you Hello I guess that you may need to remove these also Crypto dynamic-map IPSecVPNDM 1 set ikev1 IPSec transform-set Crypto-map dynamic IPSecVPNDM 1jeu reverse-road card crypto IPSecVPNCM 1-isakmp dynamic ipsec IPSecVPNDM And again with the sequence number of 65535 for example instead of 1 Dynamic crypto map IPSecVPNDM 65535 define ikev1 IPSec transform-set Crypto-map dynamic IPSecVPNDM 65535 the value reverse-road map of crypto IPSecVPNCM 65535 - isakmp dynamic ipsec IPSecVPNDM Then use a different number of VPN L2L sequence. For example, the sequence number indicates where order ASA tries to find a match for a VPN connection. Also, it probably gives this error message because you have dynamic configurations already with this sequence number and try to use the same with VPN L2L configurations. Yet once if you can configure a second VPN L2L at some point then again would you use a different sequence number for this connection -Jouni The IOS IPSec VPN configuration Cisco router Hi experts, I have not configured the VPN for a long time on the routers so I want your recommendation on best practices. I need to run OSPF over it, so it must be GRE over IPSec I googled and I see the old type of config that I used to do with the use of the crypto map. Then I see config with profile Ipsec that is applied to the interface of tunnel (tunnel protection). I also see on the manual on isakmp profile... Is there an example of configuration that you can provide? This is site to site VPN with PAT most basic on the interface for the remote desktop for surfing the Internet. My routers are fairly recent. One is 2821 with new 12.4 T code and another 2921 router. Thank you Hello! I didn't have a corresponding exactly to your needs, but I did a. I set it up by hand while there might be errors in config. IOS IPSEC VPN with NAT - translation problem I'm having a problem with IOS IPSEC VPN configuration. /* crypto ISAKMP policy 10 BA 3des preshared authentication Group 2 ISAKMP crypto keys TEST123 address 205.xx.1.4 ! ! Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac CHAIN ! ! Map 10 CRYPTO map ipsec-isakmp crypto the value of 205.xx.1.4 peer transformation-CHAIN game match address 115 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 Description FOR the EDGE ROUTER IP address 208.xx.xx.33 255.255.255.252 NAT outside IP card crypto CRYPTO-map ! interface FastEthernet0/1 INTERNAL NETWORK description IP 10.15.2.4 255.255.255.0 IP nat inside access-list 115 permit 192.xx.xx.128 0.0.0.3 ip 172.xx.1.0 0.0.0.3 */ (This configuration is incomplete / NAT configuration needed) Here is the solution that I'm looking for: When a session is initiated from the "internal network" to the "distance IPSEC - 172.xx.1.0/30 ' network I want the address scheme '10.15.0.0/16' NAT translation deals with '192.xx.xx.128/30' before forwarding via the IPSEC VPN Tunnel. For more information, see "SCHEMA ATTACHED". Any help is greatly appreciated! Thank you Clint Simmons Network engineer You can try the following NAT + route map approach (method 2 in this link) http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080093fca.shtml Thank you Raja K WILL IPSec VPN with mapped IP question Hello I am trying to configure two Cisco routers (1801 & 837) for VPN IPSec de ERG. One of them has a static IP and the other is a DSL connection; so a dynamic IP address. We have a few additional static IP assigned to us through DSL connection. So I try to use a static NAT to get the VPN connection. Unfortuantely, the VPN connection does not come to the top. Can anyone help... ? The configuration of the two routers is attached here. R1 crypto ISAKMP policy 10 ! ! interface Tunnel10 IP nat inside source 192.168.3.1 static 22.33.44.55 R2 crypto ISAKMP policy 11 ! FYI:-J' I try the same config with a loop back, also without success. But if I just change the IP address of the source R1 to be the dynamic IP address, it works fine. But, since it is a dynamic IP, I can't implement this. Thank you in advance to you all... Nimal Hi Chris, If public IP address 22,33,44,55 is routable R2, you can use the p2p gre + ipsec vpn. You can test it by creating an address of loopback on R1 lo10 int 22.33.44.55 Add IP 255.255.255.255 and ping 22.33.44.55 source R2 11.22.33.44. If this public IP address is routable, you can use your configuration. HTH, Lei Tian Hi all I find this compression of supporting IPPCP 2600XM for IPSec VPN. It seems that it is supported only with a VPN module, is it? What would you say if I don't have module VPN, but the IPSec VPN configuration and compression for a connection low speed? BTW, the IPSec VPN and "compress stac" can co-exist? Also, what kind of compression support in 28xx with IPSec VPN? Thank you very much. MAK MAK, It depends on the installed vpn module. The previous support compression, but the compression is performed in software, not on the card, which offers only encryption. For this to work, you must run IOS 12.2 (13) T or later. If your previous IOS running, you cannot use compression alongside encryption PURPOSE cards at all. The latest maps AIM-VPN /? P II IPPC support in hardware. More information is here: http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/routers/ps259/products_data_sheet09186a0080088750.html This link displays information related to the release of functionality of software compression of 12.2 (13) T Thus, the options you have depend on the IOS and the card BUT you have. Beginning IOS and card without compression 12.2 (13) T and IOS beginning, hardware encryption software compression Last map and supporting encryption and hardware compression IOS. I'm unsure of the 2800 series, I expected that they support the latest novelty of compression and hardware encryption. Andy IPSec VPN between Cisco and ScreenOS Hello I'm trying to set up a simple IPSec VPN between a Cisco 2911 router and a Juniper Netscreen ScreenOS (not exactly now the model) device. Initially the debbuging seems good (QM_IDLE), but the ISAKMP Security Association is deleted. The guy managing the Juniper device send me an extract from his diary: ########################################################################### 2012-08-28 10:24:16 info 00536 IKE Phase 2 msg ID
9b 839579: negotiations failed. 2012-08-28 10:24:16 info system 00536 rejected a package of IKE loopback.11 of
217.150.152.45:500 with cookies 87960e39d074ca49 and 9302d26c7ce324a5 because there is no acceptable Phase 2 proposals... It has defined the following phase 2 proposals: IKE the value p2-proposal "G2_esp_aes256_sha_1800s" group2 esp aes256-sha-1, 1800 second ########################################################################### And I use these: ########################################################################### crypto ISAKMP policy 1 BA aes 256 preshared authentication Group 2 ! ISAKMP crypto key
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac card crypto ipsec vpn 2 isakmp Description * VPN Anbindung nach PKI in Magdeburg *. defined by peer 217.150.152.45 define security-association life seconds 1800 the value of the transform-set esp - aes match address PKI-TRAFFIC ! ########################################################################### Here is my Log: ################################################################################################################# 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): profile of THE request is (NULL) 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: created a struct peer 217.150.152.45, peer port 500 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: new position created post = 0x2A2D7150 peer_handle = 0x8000003A 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x2A2D7150, refcount 1 to peer isakmp_initiator 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): insert his with his 31627E04 = success 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): cannot start aggressive mode, try the main mode. 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 217.150.152.45 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-rfc3947 ID 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-07 ID NAT - t 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-03 ID 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-02 ID NAT - t 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SA_REQ_MM 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_I_MM1 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): Beginner Main Mode Exchange 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_NO_STATE 28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE. 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP (0): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) MM_NO_STATE 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM1 = IKE_I_MM2 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): treatment ITS payload. Message ID = 0 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 239 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is DPD 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE frag vendor processing id payload 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE Fragmentation support not enabled 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 217.150.152.45 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): pre-shared key local found
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: analysis of the profiles for xauth... 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 1 against the policy of priority 1 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: AES - CBC encryption 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: SHA hash 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: group by default 2 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: keylength 256 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 1 0 x 51 0x80
28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): atts are acceptable. Next payload is 0 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): Acceptable atts: real life: 0 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): Acceptable atts:life: 0 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): fill atts in his vpi_length:4 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): fill atts in his life_in_seconds:86400 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): return real life: 86400 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): timer life Started: 86400. 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 239 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is DPD 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE frag vendor processing id payload 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE Fragmentation support not enabled 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM2 = IKE_I_MM2 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_SA_SETUP 28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE. 28 August 08:23:46.452: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE 28 August 08:23:46.452: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM2 = IKE_I_MM3 28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP (0): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) MM_SA_SETUP 28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH 28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM3 = IKE_I_MM4 28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP: (0): processing KE payload. Message ID = 0 28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (0): processing NONCE payload. Message ID = 0 28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 217.150.152.45 28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE 28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM4 = IKE_I_MM4 28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): send initial contact 28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): ITS been pre-shared key, using id ID_IPV4_ADDR type authentication 28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP (1049): payload ID next payload: 8 type: 1 address: 92.67.80.237 Protocol: 17 Port: 500 Length: 12 28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): the total payload length: 12 28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH 28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): sending a packet IPv4 IKE. 28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE 28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM4 = IKE_I_MM5 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP (1049): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): payload ID for treatment. Message ID = 0 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP (1049): payload ID next payload: 8 type: 1 address: 217.150.152.45 Protocol: 17 Port: 500 Length: 12 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (0): peer games * no * profiles 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): HASH payload processing. Message ID = 0 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): SA authentication status: authenticated
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): SA has been authenticated with 217.150.152.45 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: try inserting a peer
28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM5 = IKE_I_MM6 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM6 = IKE_I_MM6 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM6 = IKE_P1_COMPLETE 28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): start Quick Mode Exchange, M - ID of 1582159006 28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): initiator QM gets spi 28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE 28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): sending a packet IPv4 IKE. 28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): entrance, node-1582159006 = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_INIT_QM
28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_QM_READY = IKE_QM_I_QM1 28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_COMPLETE 28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP (1049): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) QM_IDLE 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: node set-452721455 to QM_IDLE 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): HASH payload processing. Message ID =-452721455 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): treatment protocol NOTIFIER PROPOSAL_NOT_CHOSEN 1 SPI 0, message ID =-452721455, his 0x31627E04 = 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): peer does not paranoid KeepAlive. 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): remove the reason for HIS "fatal Recevied of information' State (I) QM_IDLE (post 217.150.152.45) 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): node-452721455 error suppression FALSE reason 'informational (en) State 1. 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_INFO_NOTIFY 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: node set 494253780 to QM_IDLE 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): sending a packet IPv4 IKE. 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): purge the node 494253780 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_DEST_SA 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): remove the reason for HIS "fatal Recevied of information' State (I) QM_IDLE (post 217.150.152.45) Intertoys_Zentrale_Waddinxveen_01 #. 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: Unlocking counterpart struct 0x2A2D7150 for isadb_mark_sa_deleted(), count 0 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: delete peer node by peer_reap for 217.150.152.45: 2A2D7150 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): node-1582159006 error suppression FALSE reason 'IKE deleted. 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH 28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_DEST_SA = IKE_DEST_SA ################################################################################################################# Is there something special that needs to be addressed when creating a VPN for Juniper devices? Greetings Thomas The peer IPSec a PFS enabled, do the same in your crypto-map: card crypto ipsec vpn 2 isakmp PFS group2 Set -- don't you remember that helps my security questions cannot get into my account to change your number because don't remember my security questions Unable to login to system or BIOS password guests Original title: lockout need someone to help me find why my computer is locked keeps saying system out or enter in bios password .screen she says protected by an automatic lock, how can I get into a habit accept my administrator or original password Why your list of games that are windows 7 is compatible if small and with games that I have ever heard. What is the list of incompatible biggest games? and why don't you show it. If you do not provide a list of popular games that are compatible, how Hello Is someone out there can tell me why whenever I turn on my computer, it runs a check of the drive to Cdrive? Cannot download and install programs or well they will not start when it is installed In the past two months all of a sudden some programs no longer work and I can't install new programs. Ex 1 that I downloaded and installed SKYPE and used it no problem, now I can't open it for use on my computer. If someone calls me, I can access andSimilar Questions
destination remote.dyndns.com tunnel
tunnel destination 75.67.43.79
BA aes 256
preshared authentication
Group 2
ISAKMP crypto key XXXXXXX address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 no.-xauth
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-SHA esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac
!
Profile of crypto ipsec CRYPTOPROFILE
game of transformation-ESP-AES-SHA
!
interface Tunnel100
Description of remote.dyndns.org
IP 10.254.220.10 255.255.255.252
IP virtual-reassembly
IP tcp adjust-mss 1400
source of Dialer0 tunnel
tunnel destination 75.67.43.79
ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode
Tunnel CRYPTOPROFILE ipsec protection profile
cron-event entry timer cron name "CHRON" * * *"
command action 1.0 cli 'enable '.
action 1.1 cli command "configures terminal.
Action 1.2 command cli "interface tunnel100".
Action 1.3 cli command "destination remote.dyndns.org tunnel".
!
BA aes 256
preshared authentication
Group 2
ISAKMP crypto key XXXXXXX address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 no.-xauth
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-SHA esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac
!
Profile of crypto ipsec CRYPTOPROFILE
game of transformation-ESP-AES-SHA
!
interface Tunnel100
Description of local.dyndns.org
IP 10.254.220.9 255.255.255.252
IP virtual-reassembly
IP tcp adjust-mss 1400
source of Dialer0 tunnel
tunnel destination 93.219.58.191
ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode
Tunnel CRYPTOPROFILE ipsec protection profile
cron-event entry timer cron name "CHRON" * * *"
command action 1.0 cli 'enable '.
action 1.1 cli command "configures terminal.
Action 1.2 command cli "interface tunnel100".
Action 1.3 cli command "destination local.dyndns.org tunnel".
define peer dynamic XXXXXXXXX.dyndns.org
* 01:02:39.735 Mar 1: IPSEC: Peer has the address 70.1.1.3 (DNS cache). New IP address
* 1 Mar 01:02:41.731: IPSEC (sa_request):,.
(Eng. msg key.) Local OUTGOING = 1.1.1.2, distance = 70.1.1.200, OLD IP
local_proxy = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 (type = 4),
remote_proxy = 10.254.70.0/255.255.255.0/0/0 (type = 4),
Protocol = ESP, transform = esp-3des esp-sha-hmac (Tunnel),
lifedur = 240 s and KB 4608000,
SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 0, flags = 0 x 0
* 1 Mar 01:02:41.739: ISAKMP: (0): profile of THE request is (NULL)
* 01:02:41.739 Mar 1: ISAKMP: created a struct peer 70.1.1.200, peer port 500
* 01:02:41.739 Mar 1: ISAKMP: new created position = 0x673FB268 peer_handle = 0 x 80000008
* 01:02:41.739 Mar 1: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x673FB268, refcount 1 to peer isakmp_initiator
* 01:02:41.743 Mar 1: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500
* 01:02:41.743 Mar 1: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE
* 01:02:41.743 Mar 1: insert his with his 650AE400 = success
* 01:02:41.747 Mar 1: ISAKMP: (0): cannot start aggressive mode, try the main mode.
* 01:02:41.747 Mar 1: ISAKMP: (0): no pre-shared with 70.1.1.200! PROBLEM!
* 1 Mar 01:02:41.747: ISAKMP: (0): pre-shared key or Cert No. address. PROBLEM!
* 1 Mar 01:02:41.747: ISAKMP: (0): construct_initial_message: cannot start main mode
* 01:02:41.751 Mar 1: ISAKMP: Unlocking counterpart struct 0x673FB268 for isadb_unlock_peer_delete_sa(), count 0
* 01:02:41.751 Mar 1: ISAKMP: delete peer node by peer_reap for 70.1.1.200: 673FB268
* 01:02:41.751 Mar 1: ISAKMP: (0): serving SA., his is 650AE400, delme is 650AE400
* 01:02:41.755 Mar 1: ISAKMP: (0): purge the node-267512777
* 01:02:41.755 Mar 1: ISAKMP: error during the processing of HIS application: failed to initialize SA
* 01:02:41.755 Mar 1: ISAKMP: error while processing message KMI 0, error 2.
* 1 Mar 01:02:41.759: IPSEC (key_engine): had an event of the queue with 1 KMI messages...
Success rate is 0% (0/5)
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 5
life 3600
XXXX address 11.22.33.44 isakmp encryption key
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set 10 ah-sha-hmac esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
!
Crypto ipsec profile myprof
the value of the transform-set 10
IP 192.168.100.1 address 255.255.255.0
tunnel source 22.33.44.55
tunnel destination 11.22.33.44
protection of ipsec profile myprof tunnel
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 5
life 3600
!
XXXX address 22.33.44.55 isakmp encryption key
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set 10 ah-sha-hmac esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
!
Crypto ipsec profile myprof
the value of the transform-set 10
interface Tunnel10
192.168.100.2 IP address 255.255.255.0
tunnel source 11.22.33.44
tunnel destination 22.33.44.55
protection of ipsec profile myprof tunnel
Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteniMaybe you are looking for