ISE - restrict access to the BYOD Portal

Similar Questions

• Restrict access from the view of external endpoint

  Hello world

  I got an interesting question to come today: is it possible to restrict access to the view of physical endpoint?  This client does not support BYOD somehow and provided instead of thin laptops HP for their users access to the view since then at home, via a security gateway.  I know that you can disable the web interface from view completely, but they seek to block connections to nothing but these thin laptops.  Thank you!

  Here's a more recent document - https://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/VMware-View-KioskMode-WP-EN.pdf

• How to restrict access to the drive of Wndows xp sp3?

  I have 3 user account on my computer, it is has the administrator rights and the other is a standard user account.

  I want to restrict access to all readers for the standard player.
  I used gpedit.msc to enable the administrative model, but it also limits the account admin and me to access the road
  OS: windows XP SP3
  Please advice
  Hi Utkarsh.Ranjan,
   
  If you want to restrict access to a drive by using the Group Policy Editor, you can not apply for a particular user account. This will change for the user accounts.
   
  You can't restrict access to the complete transmission. However, you can resrtict access to folders and files inside a car to a particular user.
   
  Refer to the section "set, view, change, or remove special permissions for files and folders" in the following article and follow the steps to remove the authorization of the user access to the file/folder.
  How to set, view, change, or remove special permissions for files and folders in Windows XP

• How to restrict access to the service web application deployed on weblogic for user group only

  I built the web service application in jdevelopler 11.1.1.7. Their security policy applied in the web service of the default Oracle policy which is (policy: Wssp1.2 - 2007-Https-UsernameToken - Plain.xml)

  Now all want to access the web service application must provide the name of user and password in the header section of the SOAP request to meet the requirement of the policy.

  the following steps I'm trying to restrict access to the application of web service with a specific group of users among users of weblogic:

  Connect to the weblogic administration console

  Create user or group of users

  Click on the links of deployments

  Select your web service

  Click the Security tab

  Click the sub-tab political

  Choose your authorization provider in the menu drop-down (looks like by default)

  Choose Add Conditions-> Group-> Type in the name of the Group

  Finishing

  But access is always available for all weblogic users (IE users not in the group specified in the above security configuration). How can I restrict access to only authorized group? Any thing lacking in my approach?

  There is nothing wrong with the steps mentioned in the question. In addition, you must do the following

  At the time of the application deployment with regard to the security part, there is a list in the title of the question (which security template you want to use with this application?)

  You must select (Advanced: use a custom template that you have configured on the page of configuration of the Kingdom) a configuration mentioned in the question will be work

• Restrict access to the Page of the user in the relational database

  I have a relational database with two tables on a common ID field. The user can access all their entries in the child table with simple SQL queries and then select from a list of correspondence which of its documents records in the child table that they wish to change (i.e. ['ID'] ParentTable, ChildTable ['ID'])). Registration is then displayed using $_GET passed through the URL as parameter "recordID". However, when the user is connected and accessing a folder that matches the query, they can then enter another "RecordID" number in the URL and go to any record in the table child whether they are 'owner' of the record or not.
  
  I tried to put a statement of equivalence in the authorization user code to restrict the access to the child records users since ParentTable ['ID'] == ['ID'] ChildTable only when you are connected the user accesses the records they created previously. (In other words, when a user type a different "RecordID" in the URL, the ParentTable ['ID'] and ChildTable ['ID] are not equivalent.) The code that I entered in the authentication of the user generated by DW is as follows:
  
  If ((isset ($HTTP_SESSION_VARS ["MM_Username"]) & & ($row_ParentTable ['ID'] == ['ID'] $row_ChildTable))) {}
  ...
  
  Is still not accessible, even if tests show the ParentTable ['ID'] and ChildTable ['ID'] are not equivalent
  
  Any ideas on how to restrict access to the child records "unknown"? I'm sure it's relatively simple, but I'm having trouble to get through this obstacle.
  
  Thank you

  Thank you, Philo. In fact I got it to work by initializing a session variable of tha parent ID of the table and comparing it to the variable ID of child table, then using a header redirect in case of inequality. Part of my problem was where I put the code in the page. Anyway, it works now. It seems that the answer is always just after you have posted the question.

• How to restrict access to the system.

  Hello
  
  I thought it is possible to restrict access to the system during the processing of payroll is. The GI company is currently working to, so is distributed departments in a different location across the country during the payroll run payroll users are still transaction, insert/update of the data in the entry of the item, monthly data on the pay to play.
  
  It is technically possible to restrict access to the system or component during the race entry window? no idea to proceed accordingly?
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: user10893201 on March 3, 2010 07:27

  Hi user;

  Please check:

  Security profile is not limiting access to payroll employees [ID 344649.1]
  How install bank account maintenance and security of access to the account in Release 12 [403975.1 ID]
  Restrict access to security of payroll is not working correctly on the safety profile of set [244652.1 ID]

  Also, check search below:
  http://forums.Oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=restrict+access+&objid=f475&DateRange=all&userid=&NumResults=15

  It may be useful

  Respect of
  HELIOS

• Restrict access to the Portlet producer

  I want to restrict access to the Portlet producer.
  I mean, it is supposed that there 5 portlets to the producer.
  I want user1 will have access to only 2 portlets and user2 will have access to another 3 portlets.
  
  Could you please suggest how to achieve this type of authorization.
  
  I know everything right and single sign on in WSRP. My hypothesis is to combine these two long I can achieve.
  
  Thank you
  
  Bénédicte

  Ah ok
  something like that then?
  http://eDOCS.BEA.com/WLP/docs102/Federation/chap-entitlements.html

• Restricting access to the CPO?

  Hi team,

  Currently, we are facing two problems different w.r.t. limiting access to the CPO.

  Question 1: User should be added to the Admin group in order to access all the features of CPO.

  Description: We have added a new user groups authors definition TEO and TEO operators on one of our servers of CPO. When the user tries to create a new target, under Advanced properties, no option not being listed for the type of default profiles. That when we added the user to the Administrators group of TEO, the user can create the target successfully.  Is there anyway that we can restrict the user to not have admin access and still be able to have access to all the functions of developer?

  Question 2: In the CPO Windows user

  Description: One of our customers noticed that needed to add a windows user to the CPO, the user must be part of the management of the host group and this gives access to this same windows user to windows TEO host as an administrator.

  We believe that the above two questions are similar and what steps we can take to limit access to users. It is extremely important that users using our POC environment have access to all the useful features as developers not part of the Admin group.

  Appreciate your help.

  Thank you
  Greg

  To add users, they must be a part of the Group of Directors TEO. Or you can create your own custom security with create/update for users of the run time.

  For users of windows runtime, users must be able to interactively connect with box and must have the log on as a service/connection as batch in local security policy / group.

• Restrict access to the administration to WLC5500

  Hi all
  We have configured all our devices in WLC5500 with a service port interface, which helps us to management and monitoring. Given that in our situation, the management interface is accessible from enterprise networks, this means that desktop clients have the ability to achieve the WLC logon screens.

  Is the only way to restrict access to ports to place an on the management interface access ports, or am I missing a GUI/SSH secret command / button that will allow me to disable or limit the management of devices through the management interface?

  In which case I'll have to use an ACL on the WLC management interface, are there any known issues with denying them access to the ports http, https, telnet, ssh and LWAPs trying to connect?

  Thank you
  Leon

  You have hit it on the nose.  You must have an ACL that blocks the terminals "non-admin" to http/https/telnet/ssh/snmp on the device.  as long as you have the permit ip any at the end of the ACL, you should have no problems, or explicitly allow udp 5246/5247

• IPSEC RA - activate crossed but restrict access to the web

  ASA5520 8.2 (5) 30

  Greetings,

  I have an IPSEC RA strategy that has implemented to tunnel all traffic (no split tunnel) by the ASA (which ends on the external interface).  I need to be able to allow VPN users to access a web page (crossed) thesesame on the external interface.

  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

  Here are the current settings:

  Group Policy Admins L internal

  attributes of Group Policy L_Admins

  value of server WINS 172.16.0.33 172.16.0.9

  value of 172.16.0.33 DNS server 172.16.0.9

  VPN-idle-timeout 60

  VPN-session-timeout 480

  VPN-value filter-admin-l

  IP 172.30.4.0 allow Access-list l-admin-test-filter extended 255.255.255.252 host 172.16.0.33

  IP 172.30.4.0 allow Access-list l-admin-test-filter extended 255.255.255.252 host 172.16.0.9

  IP 172.30.4.0 allow Access-list l-admin-test-filter extended 255.255.252.252 172.16.1.4 host

  IP 172.30.4.0 allow Access-list l-admin-test-filter extended 255.255.252.252 welcome 172.16.1.2

  access-list extended l-admin-test-filter permit ip 172.30.4.0 255.255.252.252 10.24.0.0 255.252.0.0

  IP 172.30.4.0 allow Access-list l-admin-test-filter extended 255.255.252.252 the host 172.16.0.233

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelall

  value by default-field IHI.local

  type tunnel-group L_Admins remote access

  attributes global-tunnel-group L_Admins

  address ili_global pool

  PhoneFactor authentication-server-group

  Group Policy - by default-L_Admins

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group L_Admins

  pre-shared-key *.

  ++++++++++++++++++++++

  Crossed is not currently enabled, so I guess I have to add:

  permit same-security-traffic inter-interface

  and (I guess)

  mask IP local pool l_admins 172.30.4.1 - 172.30.4.2 255.255.255.252

  Global (outside) 1 interface * PAT IP

  NAT (outside) 1 mask 172.30.4.1 - 172.30.4.2 255.255.255.252

  But from there I don't know how to restrict access to a single external IP on the web on port 80.

  Hello

  Enter the correct command to permit traffic and the same interface of leave is

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  The command you posted allow traffic between 2 different interfaces that have the same value of 'security level'

  permit same-security-traffic inter-interface

  What about PAT Dynamics for Internet traffic

  If you have already

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  Then you will need the command "nat" for the VPN pool

  NAT (outside) 1 172.30.4.0 255.255.255.252

  In what concerns the control of Internet traffic, should not be able to simply add this destination IP address to the VPN filter ACL you have ever used? I mean the ACL named "l-admin-test-filter".

  For example

  L-admin-test-filter access list note allow the external server connection

  access-list l-admin-filter-test permit tcp 172.30.4.0 255.255.255.252 host eq 80

  access-list l-admin-filter-test permit tcp 172.30.4.0 255.255.255.252 host eq 443

  access-list l-admin-filter-test permit tcp 172.30.4.0 255.255.255.252 host eq 8080

  -Jouni

• How to restrict access to the particular presentation table in a given area?

  My current configuration in the presentation layer is:

  Business generic sale-> field

  -Sales-> presentation Table measures

  -TotalSalesofGoods ->field

  -The costs of the measures -> presentation Table

  -CostOfGoods ->field

  -Customer Dimensions -> presentation Table

  -Items-> field

  I have two built roles, 'ShouldSeeGenericSalesSubjectArea' and 'ShouldSeeCostFields '.

  • Permissions
    • "Domain generic sales."
      • User authenticated-> no access
      • ShouldSeeGenericSalesSubjectArea-> read
      • ShouldSeeCostFields-> default
    • "Measures of sales."
      • User authenticated-read >
      • ShouldSeeGenericSalesSubjectArea-> default
      • ShouldSeeCostFields-> default
    • "Measures of costs".
      • User authenticated-> no access
      • ShouldSeeGenericSalesSubjectArea-> default
      • ShouldSeeCostFields-> read
    • "Dimensions of the client".
      • User authenticated-read >
      • ShouldSeeGenericSalesSubjectArea-> default
      • ShouldSeeCostFields-> default
    • All fields have permissions to:
      • User authenticated-read >
      • ShouldSeeGenericSalesSubjectArea-> default
      • ShouldSeeCostFields-> default

  Given two users:

  • UserA
    • The user has following roles:
      • ShouldSeeGenericSalesSubjectArea
      • ShouldSeeCostFields
    • The user can see everything except the table of fees
  • UserB
    • The user has following roles:
      • ShouldSeeGenericSalesSubjectArea
    • The user can see everything except the table of fees
  • My ultimate goal is:
    • "ShouldSeeGenericSalesSubjectArea" allows access to see the "generic sales subject area", but does not measure cost
    • "ShouldSeeCostFields' allows you to see the presentation layer of"measures of cost. "
    • Example:
      • UserA from above should see everything (including the "cost measures").
      • UserB above should see everything, except 'measures of cost. "

  I tried several different combinations of levels of authorization without result. From my understanding, Oracle security works by taking the path of any restriction. I do something wrong with my permissions on the presentation layer of "measures of cost? Please let me know if there is anything I can clarify or if you need more information.

  I was able to make it work by giving access to role of cost at the level of the subject area. Then each material is no access on the cost, but access if had the other role.

• Restrict access to the page

  Hello

  Appreciate if some web developers who are more experienced can help a beginner like me:

  I already used the Dreamweaver Server behavior to restrict access to a page... for example, localhost/xxx/xxx.php

  However, when I have a link that has a php echo as localhost/xxx/xxx.php?id= <? PHP echo $row_rsListing ["ListingID'];? ">" > < button type = "button" class = "btn, btn - sm btn - default" style = "background-color: #add8e6" > change list < / button > < / has > and I click on the link and it goes to a URL that says localhost/xxx/xxx.php?id=1, I can then go to the URL line and changed manually to localhost/xxx/xxx.php?id=5 which is under a different user and page restrict access doesn't stop me access to this page.

  What should I do to prevent this?

  Thanks in advance.

  Peter

  The best advice you can get as a beginner is to stop using Dreamweaver server behaviors. They have been deprecated by Adobe many years ago and have been removed from Dreamweaver, because PHP code they use is not reliable. All the database-driven server behaviors rely on what is called the original MySQL extension in PHP, which has been removed from PHP 7. Even if your site currently still support the original MySQL extension, you will be forced to redo all your code when it is upgraded to PHP 7.

  Adobe has not created versions updates to server behaviors. You must either learn how to manually code PHP yourself (not particularly difficult) or buy third-party extensions created by DMXZone or WebAssist.

• Restrict access to the PROD, but not DR.

  I use version 11.2.0.3.0 Production. I have questions.

  1 Prod DB is frequently asked by developers and QA guy with intensive queries of resources resulting in production down? So we intend to restrict access to these users of prod and don't give access to functional users. And for the developer/qa guys, give them access to Dr. (stand-by). So, how do I restrict user to prod but not the doctor (copy of Prod), how can this be achieved? Or any other way to do this?

  2. our production DBAs, complain that they are facing a problem (mighyt be performance related) because of sessions connected for long hours with the inactive state of developer/qa people. But my understanding was, he simply eats low memory (much lower), but will not set any CPU load, so need advice of experts, how session idle could cause problem?

  Use of theSERVER_HOST environment variable.

  See SYS_CONTEXT in the doc of the SQL language.

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e26088/functions184.htm

  The host name of the computer on which the instance is running.

  SELECT SYS_CONTEXT (' USERENV', 'SERVER_HOST' ') FROM DUAL;

• Reasons to restrict access to the Virtual Center Console

  We have the latest version of Virtual Center 2.5 with the latest version of ESX 3.5.

  Our technical staff has full access to Virtual Center but, I limited our permissions of LWOP. A common request of the NOC is the console access. I hesitate to give them that because in our group I have see it used for convenience rather than need. If that's my only reason, I'll probably have to acquiesce. I wanted to see if there are other reasons to restrict access to VC console which I think not. Perhaps around resources or other?

  Hello

  OK, you don't want the users to use the VIC, as it will take away from your service console resources.

  The COS runs by default on the heart of processor 0 0. So even if other CPU resources are available after having users end up using the console instead of remote desktop software such as RDP/Citrix means that your server becomes past. It might even cause problems on execution of virtual machines with lots of CPU available on the rest of the host.

  If you use appropriate remote desktop software - in a VMware guest - he gets the ability to run on any kernel and it is properly limited to the resources that you assign to it have.

  So YES you are right, you don't want anyone to give access to the consoles of VIC.

  Hope this helps,

  --

  Wil

  _____________________________________________________

  VI-box tools & scripts wiki at http://www.vi-toolkit.com

• Restrict access to the content to some participants

  Hello
  
  Is it possible in a workspace to restrict access to content such as wiki pages, documents,... to some of the participants?
  
  For example, only employees of oracle can see what file, folder, or wiki page and not the other participants in the same workspace who are the clients.
  
  Thank you
  Greg

  Greg,

  Restrict access to files is possible see http://weblog.oraclecorp.com/weblog/team/Beehive/2010/03/using_acls_to_selectively_hide.html.

  However, the documents and Wiki pages can be hidden the ACL for the entities are not available to any client user.

  Phil