issue of Nexus 5548UP architecture base

Similar Questions

• Nexus 5548UP L3 VLAN & implementation of OSPF

  Ladies and gentlemen,

  I would like to know what I need to do to configure a VLAN L3 in Nexus 5548UP 2. Each link is connected to two Catalyst 4500 s (Core - LAN). The kernel is running ospf so I thisnk a need to activate it in the Nexus and perhaps hsrp.

  You already did something like this?

  Here is the schema

  Thanks in advance,

  JC

  Jorge,

  Check private Inbox, I hope this helps you...

  -Kenny

• Cisco Nexus 5548UP switch current Version 5.2 (1) N1 (4)

  Hi, we are currently have Cisco Nexus 5548UP switch current Version 5.2 (1) N1 (4)

  It is not listed as affected version:

  Known affected releases:

  (5)

  5.2 (1) N1(8A)

  6.0 (2) N2 (5)

  7.0 (3) N1 (0.125)

  7.0 (4) N1 (1)

  7.1 (0) N1 (0.349)

  The fixed versions known as follows:

  Known fixed releases:

  (7)

  6.0 (2) N2 (4.3)

  6.0 (2) N2(5A)

  7.0 (1) ZN (0.615)

  7.0 (5) N1 (0.173)

  7.0 (5) N1 (1)

  7.1 (0) N1 (0.371)

  7.1 (0) N1 (1)

  It needs to be updated to the latest versions?

  If Yes, what version of the fixed known better adapt our current version

  Cisco Nexus 5548UP switch current Version 5.2 (1) N1 (4)

  Thank you.

  I had the same question, so I opened a folder of TAC to find the version of the software. I was told that the software listed as available in the bug report are versions of NX - custom OS and that there was no version patched for the 5548p. The support engineer also said that the updates of Nexus 5 k should not until November or December. The best advice I could get was to subscribe to the bug report and wait to be notified of an available upgrade.

• How a policy without moving can be configured for iSCSI traffic in Nexus 5548UP? Are there side effects?

  How a policy without moving can be configured for iSCSI traffic in Nexus 5548UP? Are there side effects?

  Hello

  Side effect depends on your network config, but I can tell you how config no iscsi traffic reduction policy...

  We have three-stage configuration in link below is image...

  1. QOS class - for the first traffic ranking

  2 queue (INPUT/OUTPUT) - this is where you book or traffic police

  3 Netwrok QOS - where you key or setting MTU for classified traffic at the bottom of the basket which tissue in the nexus program

  

  (config) # class-map type qos myTraffic / / traffic ISCSI of Match
  (config-WCPA-qos) # match iscsi Protocol

  #policy - type myQoS-QoS policy map / / qos Set group 2 ISCSI traffic so that it can be recognized
  class myTraffic
  the value of qos-Group 2

  (config-WCPA-may) # class-map type networks myTraffic
  (nq-WCPA-config) # match qos-Group 2

  (nq-WCPA-config) # type network-qos policy-map myNetwork-QoS-policy
  (nq-pmap-config) # class type networks myTraffic
  (config-pmap-nq-c) # break without moving
  (config-pmap-nq-c) # mtu 2158
  (config-pmap-nq-c) # sh type of network-qos policy-map myNetwork-QoS-policy

  (config-pmap-c-qos) # class-map type myTraffic queues
  (config-WCPA-may) # match qos-Group 2

  (config-pmap-nq-c) # policy - map type queues myQueuing-policy
  (config-pmap-may) # class type myTraffic queues
  % of bandwidth (config-pmap-c-only) # 50
  (config-pmap-c-only) # class type class default queues
  % of bandwidth (config-pmap-c-only) # 25
  (config-pmap-c-only) # sh policy-map type myQueuing-policy Queuing

  (config-sys-qos) # type of service-QoS policy entry strategy myQoS
  (config-sys-qos) # type of service-network-qos myNetwork-QoS-policy policy
  -service policy (qos-sys-config) # type myQueuing-policy input queues
  (config-sys-qos) # type of service-policy output myQueuing-policy queuing

  Let me know your concerns

• Nexus 5548UP uplinks to the Catalyst 4510R

  I design my entirely 10g data center access layer with a pair of 5548UP switches in an EvPC and a pair of double hosted 2232PP FEX. I need to be able to uplink my pair of 5500 s up to my pair of classic 4510R aggregation switches. Each 4510R has two supervisors SUP of v, each with two ports 10g X 2. I have a trunk double 10g in a port between each 4510R channel.

  What is the ideal method for uplink to the 5500's to 4510R switches? Like many, I understand that one of the two ports of 10 g on each V Sup can be active. I should double home each 5548 to each 4510R STP and let it do its thing? I am able to do it with my SUP of V? And if so, I've always will be able to junction ports dual 10g in a port between the two switches 4510R channel? I need to maintain a large pipe between the regular for my campus traffic aggregation swithces which do not cross to the data center.

  Thank you!

  Well since you cannot cluster the 45K as a virtual switch (Cisco with new sup will start the supported VSS in the 4500 try to check which sup exactly and if you get like this will make a significant improvement in your design)

  Anyway the only method you can use currently is the traditional way, which is a function of STP (use rapid-PVST)

  each N5K use a separate link for each 45K and STP will be on links in blocking mode

  However, you could do some STP design and vlan for load sharing where you can send the vlan x more link1 and vlan y b at 45 K using cost PLEASE link

  HTH

• Issues of Nexus 1000v

  Hi all

  How Nexus 1000v (DVS) are that a Vcenter version 5.1 can connect?

  Thank you.

  By the release notes

  Support of the unique VMware data center

  The Cisco Nexus 1000V can be connected to a data center VMware vCenter Server unique object. Note that this virtual data center can span several physical data centers.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/Datacenter/nexus1000/SW/4 _...

  See also table 1 Configuration limits for Cisco Nexus 1000V

• Issues of user Firefox Touch base...

  I use FF Touch for a few days now - and love! Since I'd like even more when it is available in the Windows store so I can install it on my RT of Surface. However I have a few basic questions of the user:
  1. the only way I can find to access the Favorites and history is launching a new tab - is there another way?
  2. How can I set home, search prefs, etc.?
  3 touch is not sync with the desktop version; What is the production version?
  4. any idea on when this will be available in store Windows 8?
  5. clear the cache?

  currently bookmarks Office will not appear in the metropolitan region as suggestions as soon as you start typing in the address bar - this will probably change in a later version of the application as the bookmarking system is more sophisticated. See also the answer of mbrubeck at https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/985166

  with respect to RT: I think this train has already left. platform did not really get much traction throughout the industry (perhaps these restrictive policies were part of that?), so even if there was a complete turnaround, I doubt that mozilla would be investing resources for the browser for windows to port rt.

• set up to bring the Fibre Channel between UCS of interconnection fiber and Nexus 5548UP.

  by using the following configuration between Nexus5k and UCS FI. the status of channel comes to ini and change to notConnected.

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  FC1/31 431 notConnected swl - 100 F
  FC1/32 431 notConnected swl - 100 F

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  The system version: 5.2 (1) N1(1b)

  1 on FCoE
  1 active FEX
  active toy-channel-trunk 1
  interface vlan 1 on
  1 active LACP
  1 active LLDP
  1 active NPIV
  1 active sshServer
  1 on GANYMEDE
  1 active telnetServer
  Uni-directional active 1
  1 active VPC

  san-port-channel interface, 100
  active channel mode
  switchport mode F
  switchport trunk allowed vsan 431

  interface fc1/31
  switchport 'SAN PO to UCS - one' description
  channel-group 100
  no downtime

  interface fc1/32
  switchport 'SAN PO to UCS - one' description
  channel-group 100
  no downtime

  interface fc1/31
  switchport mode F
  interface fc1/32
  switchport mode F

  Help, please

  You must update your 5 k at least

  6.0 (2) N1 (2)

• Impossible to compile examples of NOR-DAQmx Base 3.4 installation of Red Hat

  By typing 'make' in/usr/local/natinst/nidaqmxbase/examples/I gives the following error: $ make gcc-I /... / include - O2 - lnidaqmxbase o acquireNScans/usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/libnidaqmxbase.so incompatible to jump when you're looking for a lnidaqmxbase - / usr/bin/ld: cannot find lnidaqmxbase - collect2: ld returned 1 exit status is: * [acquireNScans] error 1 it seems that libraries are not compatible with my version of Red Hat/gcc. Are pre-built libraries are built during installation? Don

  In case anyone else has this problem, I managed to solve it by (1) adding - m32 for INDICATORS in the Makefile and (2) by following these instructions:

  «During the generation of the examples, the linker can point out that liblvrtdark.so»
  unresolved symbols in the Standard C++ library.  It is a known issue as the
  NOR-DAQmx Base 3.4 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 4.  For good link and run
  examples, make the following changes to the Makefile.

  Add /usr/local/lib/LabVIEW-2010/patchlib/libstdc++.so.6 to nilibs.
  Add - Wl, - rpath, ' / usr/local/lib/LabVIEW-2010/patchlib "for flags. "since the README file:

  http://FTP.NI.com/support/softlib/multifunction_daq/nidaqmxbase/3.4/Linux/Readme.txt

  Don

• L3 Nexus 7000 routing Proxy

  Hello

  I propose Nexsu 7000 as backbone switch for my client.

  But I do not understand why proxy L3 routing must be used under M & F2 mixed condition.

  But module F2 also bear all capacity of L3, L3 routing dosen't support of the F2 module with module of the M series.

  Could you tell me why this is happening and explain Nexus 7000 architecture?

  Thank you

  Yun.

  M2 + F2e in same VDC works dated 6.2 (2), in which case F2e module returns to the classic transmission L2 mode, leaving all L3 decisions up to the M2 module, so you still need L3 routing proxy.

  I think the reasoning behind this is because of the motor M2 L3 being much more potent than the freight forwarder F2e L3.  For example, the motor M2 can make OTV, the impossible F2e.  Logic to return L3 decisions for a more powerful card.

  What I find strange is that although F2e online map has an integrated transmission of L3 engine, that I can not configure the IP of L3 addresses directly on F2e ports.  Creating a VLAN SVI and by setting the port access mode F2e work, but if I only need a link point single point of L3 between the Nexus 7 K and another device, and I have configured the vPC, vPC then in an inconsistent with Type 2 State, because the VLAN and/or IVR is not present on the switch of peers.

• Nexus 5000 operating as a standalone FibreChannel Switch

  Hello world

  Does anyone know if the Nexus 5000 can be used as a standalone FibreChannel Switch? Which means I don't want to run NPV on this and connect it up to a MDS or a different type of switch FibreChannel. I'm looking to create a 'Pod' scenario. Where a few servers and a storage Bay would hang the 5K on a login F_Ports is local FLOGI DB and be able to use zoning and traffic went immediately from the 5K, etc etc? I know that 5 K is not a full blown fibre channel switch such that it has some limitations, but again I think to a "Pod" as scenario.

  If the script above won't work for some reason any using CF can achieve us with FCoE CNAs on servers & storage Bay?

  Finally, FC domain IDS how 5 K can cause?

  Sorry for the questions. I'm new to SAN switching at this stage.

  Thank you all!

  Yes, it works even FC code NX - OS like a switch MDS switch.

  You connect FC HBAS, ports SAN or FCoE CNAs to Nexus.

  However, you need to license storage.

  Nexus 5010 supports up to 8 4 G FC or FC G 6 8 ports with the expansion module

  Nexus 5020 supports up to 16 4 G FC or 12 8 G FC ports with the expansion module

  Nexus 5548UP supports up to ports FC 32 4 / 8G without the expansion module

  Nexus 5548UP supports up to 48 4 FC ports / 8G with the expansion module

  Nexus 5596UP supports up to 48 4 FC ports / 8G without the expansion module

  Nexus 5596UP supports up to 96 4 FC ports / 8G with the expansion module

• Double room Nexus 2348UPQ / Max ports for vPC links

  Hi people,

  Cisco Nexus 2348UPQ has 24 to 10 GB uplink interfaces. Supposedly on the distribution layer, we have a pair of Cisco Nexus 5548UP, how many ports we can group about 2348 for vPC for double-homing links.

  Thank you very much!!!

  Hi Chris,

  Using an Extender of fabric with a Cisco Nexus 5000 and 6000 Series Switch Cisco Nexus

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/Datacenter/nexus2000/HW/installation/guide/nexus_2000_hig/overview.html#pgfId-1415984

  -If you decide to use the drop cable instead of the 40 G uplinks, please note the following limitation:

  The 2348TQ of Cisco Nexus and Nexus 2348UPQ FEX, if a port channel is used to connect a switch parent with a tissue Expander device, the port channels can have up to 8 ports.

  Nexus 2348 FEX devices have a total of 6 * 40 Gigabit Ethernet uplink ports to the parent switch. If these are used with native port of 40G uplinks on a switch of parent, there is no limitation. 6 ports can be used in a hosted configuration only hosted or double. You can also use 40 Gigabit Ethernet uplink ports on the extensor of N2348 fabric with 10 Gigabit Ethernet ports on the switch to parent when it is used with the appropriate wiring. A maximum of 8 ports can be added to the string of port between the parent switch and the fabric Extender. If it's a double hosted configuration, VPC for the extensor of fabric, only 4 ports per switch are allowed in the channel of the port.

  Cisco Nexus 5600 series NX - OS Layer 2 switching Configuration Guide, version 7.x - configuration of the fabric Extender

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/Datacenter/nexus5600/SW/Layer2/7x/b_5600_Layer2_Config_7x/b_6k_Layer2_Config_7x_chapter_01110.html

  -SFP support and cables are listed in the Cisco Nexus 2300 platform fabric Extender card (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/nexus-2000-series-fabric-extenders/datasheet-c78-731663.html).

  I'd be suspicious of this bug;

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuu88175/?reffering_site=dumpcr

  "If it's a double configuration hosted, vpc for fex, that only 4 ports per switch are permitted in the Port-Channel"

  HTH,

  Qiese Sa'di

• FMW: Links Portal Upgrade Advisor to the page build Middleware of Oracle 11 g Architecture

  Perhaps a link in the Advisor to each document for installation/upgrade is needed.   Would be very useful.  And, if the document refernence is not specific to the step, but it is more general in nature, then a shor comment indicating to view only the relevant sections of the document.   That, to me, would be the most valuable contribution.  Please ask for clarification if necessary.   The page I am referring here would be 'Building the Middleware of Oracle 11g Architecture basis'. Each of the steps listed there is extremely useful.   Also, small change to it would be great for it is according to put it as follows in the next video that Dan is putting together to address upgrade scenario.

  And as mentioned in a previous debate. Would be really nice if we know exactly what is supposed to be running for each of these steps.  Not so much after we're done, but how to start.  Also, what environment should be set to.

  Example: Ensure that portal db, earphone, IDM and former/current levels are rising and runing and environment is set for new construction/PFRD area (where are the new binaries) for the portal 11g Upgrade Wizard.

  Example: Ensure that db, listener, old idm level runs and defined environment to the new layer IDM of IDM Upgrade Wizard.

  NOTE: These are examples only and may be wrong, but (and please let me know if so)... There you have something to run with.

  FYI... So I made changes at the stage 'The base Middleware of Oracle 11g Architecture site'... so we have documentation References inline + some additional details added. When you find the time, take a look and let me know if the changes are for the clearest reading / understanding of the build process.

• vPC and VSS port-channel uplinks

  Hello Forum team!

  Currently I have a configuration of a couple of Nexus 5548UP in a field of vPC with a couple of Nexus 2248TP aircraft in a double scenario hosted for the access layer (FEX in a vPC also). Core/distribution, there are a pair of 6509 cluster VSS. Now I configured a regular port-channel every 5K to the VSS functionality and works as expected. My question is this: given that in the vPC a 5K is the main and the other is secondary, a configurable vPC for the uplinks to the VSS instead of a channel of regular port of each 5 K?

  In addition, configurations must be replicated manually on both Nexus 5 K? I'm in denial about this. I'm used to how VSS works.

  Thanks to the advanced guys!

  Hello

  You can use a vPC of the pair of Nexus 5 K to the VSS cluster. There is a white paper Cisco Catalyst 6500 VSS and Cisco Nexus 7000 vPC of interoperability and best practices that will in this. While the white paper is for Nexus 7000 are you interested to do probably is the configuration shown in Figure 2 and so the scenario and considerations are the same.

  On the Nexus switches with vPC there are still two control i.e. plans, the primary and secondary that you mention. For all the configurations that should be applied at the primary and secondary, you can manually configure on the two switches or use the synchronization of Configuration characteristic Nexus (see Configuration synchronization Operations for more details).

  He was 15-months we have looked at the function so probably things have changed, but following issues with our tests, and we were see reported here in the forum at this time, we decided not to use the config Sync feature. Outside all bugs, there are some operational changes to consider and then make sure that you are comfortable with how config-sync works before putting it in a production environment.

  Concerning

• Firmware upgrade standalone network C-Blade problems

  Hello

  Recently, I have improved my own blade C22 M3 version 1.5.5 for version 2.0 (3d)
  VIC 1225 had firmware version 4.0(1b) (version 2.2(1b))

  After the upgrade by using the utility to upgrade host, I removed all the old drivers and installed the new versions.
  well, but almost immediately, I noticed very poor nateworking base.

  • The DNS lookups fail
  • Ping is lost
  • tracerts can be instant or take forever to fill

  We use this blade as a commvault backup server and two NIC VIC 1225 in a LACP team (State is active)
  on the Nexus 5548UP switch host there is a CF interface linking to the network interface, so we have our libraries available on the host backup

  If I continue to ping servers I want to backup the network remains stable connection, otherwise the backups fail.
  after downgrading the firmware of the VIC back to 2.2(1b), that all happened again to normal.

  y at - it an explanation for that? known bug?

  Thank you

  Ivo

  You also have an etherchannel configured on your nexus 5K, isn't it good?

  Take a look at the recording of messages and try to find a message MAC_FLAPPING on the MAC addresses of servers.

  See also this bug: https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuf65032.

  This has been fixed on 2.22(1b) (your old) version, but it may be on the 4.0(1b).

  Try to apply the workaround suggested and see if it works.

  See you soon,.

  Kauy Gabriel.