JKI event response time

Hello

I discovered jki awhile but, never had the opportunity to use it. Today I'm trying to see how it works

but I'm having problems when the task are back on themselves a mount of idle time is not attentive

before the end of this taks: for example waiting for an instrument prior to prepare you.

Its there a way to have a response time of more short UI

here a basic example of 8,6 it could takes between 0 to 3 s to stop

Best regards

Tinnitus

I often force them to pass through a State of rest when I'm waiting like this.  It has been discussed on the forum JKI here.  You will need to use a time-out value<= 0="" for="" this="" to="">

Tags: NI Software

Similar Questions

  • Delaying exponentially more event response

    LabView 2010

    With the help of a state machine in queue due to producer/consumer model with 6 events I'm having a problem.

    The response time to events increases each time an event occurs.

    It is a very simple application. It uses strict type dev enums to select States in the loop of the consumer.

    Clicking on one of 6 events increases the response time of the subsequent event.

    The loop of consumer has a period of 250ms. No other calendar is used anywhere.

    Any ideas as to why the response time of event continues to increase?

    Thank you

    Chris

    Christian,

    Thank you very much.

    I learned many things today.

    Not sure why I don't have any problems being programmed. Nice to have someone to point out what is happening.

    For some time that we had a meeting of LVUG here in the South Bay.

    Best regards

    Chris

  • Improves the response time

    Here's my current situation. I'm in MARCH the version 4.2.1 of the application I have a test environment 1-2821 router with IPS version of the module 12.4 T, 1-2621 router with net stream is running version 12.2, OS 1-2950 switch and a stand alone server MARCH. When I run the script to test the response time (the time it takes MARCH to warn me of the attack) it takes anywhere from 1/2 hour and 1 hour before the alarm appears where the dashboard is a way to improve the response time? Second, I see the IPS signatures in the syslog, but I don't see them on my request of MARCH during investigations into an attack. If I run a query for real-time, I see everything but cannot investigate the attack.

    I wonder the usefulness of a VINE if you are not running the latest version of the software. Cisco is expected to provide the latest update for you. The question of the DST, for example, causing some of the major problems for us.

    Run a real-time event query to determine if the events you generate are 'collected' immediately. If they are, what are the events? What rule expect you fire? Here is a description of the rules should work (they should take immediately before the start of any limitation).

    http://ciscomars.blogspot.com/2007/02/guest-article-Mars-inspection-rule.html

  • Response time

    One of my customer/user access to our database is having a problem with respect to the response time of the database. The response time is very slow, this problem occurred recently, but before the answer time is about 2 to 3 minutes but now a query will consume almost 1 hour before the database to react. The request includes this statement VIEW_ACCOUNT_PAYM_STATUS.

    Hope you can help me with this.

    Thank you

    Hello
    Are all applications started slow response or a single applicaiotn/report?
    What version of oracle you are using. You should try to trace the user's session when it starts executing the statement. If you're on 10g, you can use the followins as the user SYS command to start tracing, and it will show you events in files of follow-up to find out where your query is spend more time waiting.

    SQL> EXEC DBMS_MONITOR.session_trace_enable(session_id =>1602, serial_num=>1091, waits=>TRUE, binds=>FALSE);
    

    Salman

  • Satellite M100-165 - for the LCD Panel response time

    Hello.

    Anyone know where I can find information on the reaction time of my LCD screen on my M100-165?

    Does anyone know what is the response time LCD m100-165 (or m100 series)?

    Thx for replies :)

    Hello

    The M100 series was delivered with a display type 200 WXGA 14.1 LTN141W1-L03-0.
    To my knowledge this display should support a response speed of 25ms.

  • Can I create a spreadsheet to track events over time?  If so, how?

    Is it possible to use the numbers to track events over time?  Dates would be the only numbers you use.

    Can you give more details on what you are looking to do?  Surely you don't want only a column of dates...

    SG

  • Get the response time data VI

    Hi guys,.

    I am trying to use CD get time response data VI my VI. When I choose the pair of input-output, I can get the response data determined by the digital input to the output value. However, I need more of a pair of response data. I try to use the list of input-output, but there is no output data and response time of the VI with table 1 d of numbers.

    My question is how to use the CD get time VI data response with the list of inputs-outputs configuration? Thank you.

    Hey, Shapiro,.

    I think the problem is you have two 0 items in the above table for you will be out this definition data twice. Let me know if this does not solve the problem for you.

  • Response time of PCI-6602

    Dear users of the forum,

    I use a Counter/Timer OR PCI - 6602 for send TTL signals to another device in our laboratory. I send the signal every ~ 1-5 ms, but this time is not fixed (it depends on some other process that I do in my program of LabVIEW), so I can't use a continuous waveform.

    So, I wrote a short test program to familiarize yourself with the PCI-6602 (see attachment).

    If I send a pulse, it seems I can do this just about every 14 ms (at least this is calculated with the tick counts lag which is not very accurate; but to count the pulses with a meter gives almost as much time). So, it seems that the PCI-6602 has too long a response time for my application!

    Can someone tell me if he made the same comment? Either I use the bad vi/treat the PCI-6602 in the bad sense? If Yes, what should I do to make my small test program and finally my main program faster?

    I would be recognizing all the help and the comment!

    partial81,

    I have another idea for you to try.  Starting the 6602 being the operation that takes the most time I wrote an example which uses a trigger to start to generate the impulse and puts in place the meter to retriggered.  Basically whenever you issue a start trigger, the meter will generate a pulse.  I then use a digital line on the 6602 to generate this trigger to start (I use PFI0 and Port0/$line0 which is actually the same line in the material).  For the reenclenchee generation, wait until what is not useful, so I replaced it with a 1 ms wait.

    Can you try this and see if it works better for you?

    Dan

  • DAC single sample write response time

    I use the acquisition of data USB-6259. I wrote a simple loop to write permanently a single sample of an output to check the next time of turing analog voltage pos & neg. I have the 'writing analog DBL 1Chan 1Samp' connected to a 'multiply by neg 1 "in a loop. I run the application, and it seems that the response time is about 3msec between +/-. It's far too slow for my application. My application requires constantly reading and setting of the tensions. I get a high sampling frequency if I'm out a waveform. However, I didn't go out a waveform. I went out a voltage in response to a voltage reading. Is it possible to have a shorter response time? Is there another method (using C?) to improve response times?

    Erik,

    Windows is deterministic up to 1 ms, so there is no way we could get this application in the field of speed you need with the current hardware.  I think that you could implement this with an FPGA, and we have many options available.

  • Incredibly slow Internet response time.

    Original title: taskbar

    I had a problem with incredibly response times Internet. After reboot, I discovered in the taskbar, the icon of the single computer that deals with network connections, i.e. wifi had an x in it, which means it is turned off. (This isn't the icon to connect to the LAN of double work). Because my PC is using wifi and is not also connected to the cable, I was wondering what task is connected to wifi.

    I also noticed that my Internet speed of response actually works at an acceptable speed now that the icon shows it is off. Which task is this icon, so that I can disable it using msconfig and task is WiFi so that one is not?

    I use a Dell desktop computer, through Time Warner Cable. I had the SP3 for some time and that you have not added any new programs or updates, that I remember for a while.

    The only change in my computer added wifi (after moving to a new House/State) about six months ago.
    As a further complication, when I logged on today, connecting to the wifi network shown in the taskbar opened and ran into a mode of connection 'very good '. So yesterday and the previous week, I had access to the Internet with it NOT connected. My taskbar displays a computer screen green with waves in the upper left corner and says "Netgear WNA3100 is connected to...". "my camera wifi router in the basement next to the TW modem.
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that there are two connections wifi different trying to run... one that was working yesterday and one today showing tasks in my bar.
    I blame that for my calculation of the slow speeds.

    Looks like you have three icons of network connection...

    1. area (cable) connection icon - two screens - probably with a red X

    2. the icon of Windows wireless - a blue screen with 'waves '.

    3 - Netgear wireless connection icon describe you it as 'green with waves screen '.

    It also seems that maybe you think that 2 and 3 are separate connections. This is not the case, they will just separate indicators of the same wireless connection.

    Reading between the lines a bit, my guess is that you used to have only 1 and 2, but now you have the 3rd too. If I'm right, probably, what happened is that you have started the application of Netgear wireless configuration, which experience tells me tends to 'support' of Windows wireless configuration without even asking if you want that to happen. All you need to do to get rid of this icon of the green screen is open the Netgear configuration (via its system tray icon) and find a check box saying "let Windows to manage my wireless network connection" (or words to that effect, in addition, it is that the word 'zero' in the text). If you have no network connection after doing this, then you were always in a Netgear configuration and you will have two choices...

    1. Start the Netgear form the menu start and reverse the changes that you just made
    2. Configure Windows to control the wireless connection

    If you want to Setup Netgear instead of Windows use, I think that you will have to put up with the two icons.

    Tricky

  • Pavilion 17-F001dx: 'Windows 8 using 100% of the HARD drives with high average response time and low write speed '.

    It turns out that it is a pretty known issue windows 8.1 users infestation since at least 2013 and there is not a simple fix, then it cannot be * completely * lack of hp. but I've had two of these laptops, both the same model, one needing to be returned and exchanged for a problem absolutely no report with (hardware failure: ethernet port does not work with lights taped). Both are renovated. Both have been extreemly slow and unresponsive even compared to the lower Brazos powered by the laptop that I had before, but I recently decided to investigate why.

    So if there is something specific HP going on here, I hope that there is a simple fix. My average response time went upward as well more than a minute (> 60, 000ms), so that I'm an aberrant case here against this problem of reactivity/band bandwidth hardrive typical windows 8.1.

    Edit: there is a case with another HP pavilion laptop (intel powered, so there may be a problem of storage driver intel described in the first link) being much worse.

    Did not want to resort to that, but,.
    Going to a new facility to clean up an image of Windows Pro 8.1 from DreamSpark for my school.

    Disappointed by the lack of response. Given the odd subdomain name (h30434), I'm wondering if this forum has been abandoned.

  • WebMonitor strong expression of mailBody response time

    Hello

    Please, help me to create expression for WebMonitor strong expression of response time mailBody.

    I got the expression for the availability of transaction webMonitor, I've pasted below.

    could someone please help me create a same response time?

    def message = "Page is not available. Cannot access the URL "+ scope.get("measuredObject/url") +". ";" "
    def httpStatus = null;
    def values = $scope #httpStatus # .values (scope);
    {if (values)}
    httpStatus = values.last ()?. GetValue;
    }
    If {(httpStatus)
    def httpStatusMessage = getWebMonitorHttpStatusMessage(httpStatus?.) (ToString());
    message = message & "HTTP status is ${httpStatus} - {httpStatusMessage}.";
    }
    message += "Please contact technical support.";
    return the message;

    Hi Vicky,

    Just try to understand what is missing from the message into the existing rule.

    WebMonitor Transaction Response Time Check rule

    has a variable of severity level of alarmMsg that references 2 other variables are variables rule.

    -alarmMsgPrefix rule variable named transaction - "high response time. "The response time of ${scope.measuredObject.name} of the transaction exceeds.

    -variable rule alarmMsgSuffix retrieves the response time

    def data = $scope #responseTime # .values (scope);
    responseTime def = 0;
    {if (Data)}
    responseTime = data [0] .getValue (.avg)? : 0 ;
    return "ms, current response time is" responseTime + "ms".
    }

    Golan

  • Response time of the provider for BlackBerry World Portal

    Is it just me or response time to requests for change appear to have increased? I usually get 1 to 2 days for an update of the app and 1 day for app list changes.

    During the last two weeks, I've waited a week for an update of the app. Even more, I've been waiting 3 days for the list of updates (images, text) so that registration corresponds to the app update.

    The funny thing is, I submit the updated list of the next day to submit the app. They got approved within 1 to 2 days. I deleted them after waiting for 5 days and no updates to the app.

    Any ideas?

    We always have to approve new and updated applications updated in 2 to 5 business days, and that has not changed.  Monday was a day public holiday here in the Canada, what would elimate that as a working day for this week.  The team strives to make upward and toward the more usual period of 2 days.

  • Analysis of response time of NAM

    I have 2 small question:

    First: How Cisco NAM can calculate server, client and network responses while it is not the initiator of the traffic? It is based on the timestamps in data packets? All protocols put a timestamp in the header?

    The second question is: how NAM classify clients and servers? as I see the servers appear as a customer.

    Thanks in advance.

    Performance (IAP) intelligent application monitoring is a key feature that provides the Nam: an ability to measure the response time of the transactions between the client and the server.

    NAM monitors the flow of TCP packets between the client and the server and data response time to bring more visibility in time of response measures (ART) and the latency of the network.

    Next image will share more details:

    NAM request time response (it shows a representation of the total time of the operation as opposed to application response time)


    Transaction time / response time measurements (lists and describes measures ART measured by NAM)

    Possible NAM monitors conversation and the TCP packet flow between applications/server customers and where it grows the clients and servers.

    -Thank you

    Vinod

    To encourage contributors. RATE besoin.*

  • GPS vs V5 V6 slow response time

    I use the sample code in html5_geolocation_sample.zip.

    On a Bold 9700 running 5.0.0.714 version the response time to get a fix with enableHighAccuracy set to false is 3.5 seconds.

    On a Torch 9800 running the version 6.0.0.246 response time using the same code as before with enableHighAccuracy again set to false was 429 secinds.

    Has anyone encountered this?

    Any ideas on how to improve the response time?

    I am located in a major metro area in the United States less than 1/4 mile of a pylon.

    Thank you

    Seems to be a problem of carrier. When I switched to the use of enableHighAccuracy: true, I was able to get the response time for version 6 on the torch down to 10 seconds.

    I remember one of those Blackberry developer days one of the presenters mentioned that some GSM carriers do not support cell tower fixed well. I guess I know that one of them now.

Maybe you are looking for

  • The BYU - TV app is available for Apple TV (tvOS)?

    We know that BYU - TV app is available for the last Apple TV (tvOS)?  I'm not able to find a complete list of tvOS applications and I don't want to buy an Apple TV unless I know ahead of time.  Thank you

  • PSK MOD DEMO

    Hi all I want to set up a channel of communication with filtering and simple in the Labview Communications using PSK modulation. I know that while, due to filtering as told in the details of Modulation PSK MT. So I used a bit of padding zeros as we h

  • World of warcraft does not not on windows 7

    Im having this same problem for a sony vaio I installed recently, in the last 48 hours, Windows 7 64 bit when I used Vista. Since I installed windows 7, I found that I can't play WoW. every time I tried to open it a message "cannot find the display d

  • Question I just bought a rocket 'old '?

    Hello- I finally bought a 8 GB Fuze today!  My first mp3 player... so excited... except that I realized (and maybe it seems ridiculous) but the packaging is not one that is currently using Sansa and the date on the back says 2008.  There was a rocket

  • Individual images WVC80N FTP on an interval defined by the user to a remote server does

    Hello I'm shopping for a wireless webcam to provide periodic fixed images that are accessible via any web browser. I'm not interested in live streaming video, or what I must have remote users to directly access the camera. I currently own a Panasonic