L2l AAS behind router

Similar Questions

• Termination of VPN on Pix behind router IOS with private subnet

  OK, basically, I wonder if it is possible to terminate a VPN connection on a Pix 506 Firewall which is behind a router IOS. The public interface of the Pix 506 have a private on a 29 ip address will IOS within the interface. Network is configured as follows:

  Internet as 10Base T

  | (5 public - X.X.X.34. 38)

  | (In WIC-1ENET)

  | (.34 assigned to interface)

  Cisco 1760

  | (Pomp) | (WIC-4PORTSWITCH)

  | | (10.0.0.1 29 on 1760)

  Net private Pix 506

  (192.168.1.0) (10.0.0.2 29 on Pix)

  Now, two internal interfaces of the 1760 are configured to PAT on the IP of the interface of the 1760 and all internet traffic goes perfectly. None of the access lists are currently applied anywhere on the 1760 and a static translation on the 1760 is configured pour.35 to 10.0.0.2 ('public' ip pix). RDP and other services authorized in the pix access list work perfectly well from the outside world when you enter a.35, but if I try to terminate a VPN from a pix 501 for the pix 506 offsite using the Intellectuelle.35 property, it does not work.

  Is it possible to do this type of work setting.

  I realize I could put an external switch to 1760 and run the public subnet directly and individually in the 1760 and Pix 506, however, I really would prefer not no need to do so if it is possible to avoid it.

  Remove the crypto map to the interface on the PIX and reapply.

• The managed behind router switch remote access?

  What is the best way to access remotely to a switch behind a router?  I will use a switch SF300, and there is no server.

  For points of access (PA) behind a router, I give each a diffferent LAN address and port number.  In router I have forward TCP traffic with the single port/LAN IP.  Then using the port numbers with the address of the static router, the browser can remote access to the router or the attached AP.  But where do I put the managed switch LAN port number?  Assume default is port 80 and I would change to 8001 to switch #1; 8002 to switch #2; etc.  Could not find this info in the manual of configurtion.

  Hello

  At this point, I would recommend a call to the Cisco Small Business Centre at 1-866-606-1866 support so that action can be taken and your configuration can be reviewed.

  I have reproduced the concern here and I am able to remotely manage my switch SF300 with an RV082 as the router.

  My rule in the RV082 are as follows:

  Creating a custom topic UPnP service.  Create SF300 application name (it is a basic text field and can be any name), 8001 an external port and internal port 80.  I send to the address IP internal SF300 switch and click the check box.  From there on, I select Add to the list.  Once it appears in my list, I then click Save settings at the bottom of the page.

  Thank you!

  Dave

• L2l multiple rays routing traffic

  I have a problem I hope you can shed some light on this. I have all 3 sites connected with VPN/IPsec ikev2 tunnels using ASA 5505 and 5510 with 8.4 + code. Please see the image below for more details on my installation. All VPN tunnels are up and send traffic across the immediate neighbor, the problem is that I can't ping or access the ASA2 subnet ASA3 subnet or ASA2 of ASA3, that I'm missing in my setup? Please see below and thank you in advance for any help you can provide this.

  

  ASA 3 VPN Config:
  protocol esp integrity sha-1
  crypto ipsec security-association pmtu-aging infinite
  crypto map crypto_map 1 match address AS3_ACL
  crypto map crypto_map 1 set peer 1.1.1.1
  crypto map crypto_map 1 set ikev2 ipsec-proposal aes_256
  crypto map crypto_map interface outside
  crypto ca trustpool policy
  crypto ikev2 policy 1
  encryption aes-256
  integrity sha256
  group 2
  prf sha256
  lifetime seconds 86400
  tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 general-attributes
  default-group-policy ipsec_group_policy
  tunnel-group 1.1.1.1 ipsec-attributes
  ikev2 remote-authentication pre-shared-key *****
  ikev2 local-authentication pre-shared-key *****
  vpn-idle-timeout 6000
  vpn-session-timeout none
  vpn-tunnel-protocol ikev2
  nat (inside,outside) source static all_inside_networks all_inside_networks destination static all_outside_networks all_outside_networks no-proxy-arp route-lookup
  object-group network all_inside_networks
  network-object 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0
  object-group network all_outside_networks
  network-object 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
  network-object 10.0.18.0 255.255.255.0
  access-list ASA3_ACL extended permit ip object-group all_inside_networks object-group all_outside_networks
  

  Hello

  Seems to me that your ASA1 missing certain rules in the 'card crypto' ACL

  ASA3_ACL list extended access permitted ip object-group objects ASA3 ASA2-group

  ASA2_ACL list extended access permitted ip object-ASA3 group ASA2 object

  You miss also the "nat" command I mentioned

  public static ASA2 ASA2 destination NAT (outside, outside) static source ASA3 ASA3

  You do not have a second order of "nat" because this must match the connection management training is the

  Hope this helps

  -Jouni

• VPN to ASA behind router

  Hello

  I have ASA 5505 behind a router, which is also a dmvpn (the router), on my ASA RADIUS I configured a remote access vpn.

  But when I try to forward the VPN ports to my asa, I get problems with stability, with my talk about vpn on the router.

  Is it possible to have a dmvpn to the router and vpn for remote access to my ASA?

  I have attached the running configuration.

  Thank you

  Joelle,

  The problem here is that your router and the ASA want to use udp port 500 and udp port 4500.  Of course if you forward incoming ports then the dmvpn is not going to work and vice versa.  What you can try to have your ezvpn use ipsec-over-tcp on port 10000 and that transmits to the place.

  On the SAA configure "crypto isakmp ipsec-over-tcp port 10000.

  On the change of the client connection information, click the transport tab and select ipsec-over-tcp.

  On the router port forward tcp 10000 to the ASA.

  Hope that helps.

  -Jay

• ISA-570W behind router 1921

  Hi all

  We just bought a 570W ISA.  I have a router in 1921 that we use for our DSL connection.  Basic configuration on 1921 only for the DSL connection and pass-through.  How do you get the NATTING on ISA to allow internal users internet.  External interface on the ISA will be IP private inside the interface on 1921, so I know you do a NAT static external interface of the ISA, but not familiar with GUI CÉP.  Someone, can someone help me?

  Thank you

  Mike

  A few final things to check on the ISA

  1. Make sure that the changes above do not affect the routing table.
     • Networks--> routing--> routing table, make sure there is still a 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 for gateway 10.255.0.1
       • If it is gone, you can add it in back via the static routing in networks--> routing
  2. You can also try to change the Mode of WAN/LAN routing on IT.
     • Go to networks--> routing--> routing Mode
       • I don't think this is necessary, but read the description, I could see where it might be.  I think it's more like SHEEP bridge

  Still, I don't think you need to perform one of these, but thought I would mention them as you go over there to help expedite your resolution.

• VPN problem - "C1712 behind router Linksys ' connection to PIX515e

  Hi all

  I have a question about VPN (lan-to-lan).

  My setup is the following:

  10.1.20.x-[PIX515e_central site VPN concetrator]-(( ISP ))-[LINKSYS BEFSX41 router]-[Cisco1712_branch] - 192.168.14.x

  I would like to create tunnel VPN between C1712 and PIX515 (lan-to-lan), so users of 192.168.14.x would be able to connect to servers located on a central site in network 10.1.20.x.

  NAT - T is manually enabled on PIX and 'IPsec passtrough' is enabled on the Linksys router. Then what should I do now to create a VPN tunnel?

  What is the basic C1712 and PIX515e configuration to make it work?

  All other industries (8) work, but they are directly connected to the internet via C1712, so without router Linksys in front of him. Thus, PIX is already properly configured for this configuration.

  I guess that the installer with Linksys router does not work because of PAT.

  6.3 (4) version PIX

  C1712 Version 12.4

  Please advise!

  Thank you very much in advance!

  This line is incorrect on the router configuration:

  IP nat inside source list 6 interface FastEthernet0 overload

  Please, remove it and have her take:

  overload of IP nat inside source list 101 interface FastEthernet0

  Hope that solves this problem.

• Standard Gmail view does not work behind the router WRT110

  

  PIC - full view

  I use the gmail webmail site.

  Behind router wrt110 and in standard gmail view, I can't read my emails

  because the site stops loading in.

  The problem only occurs in the browser Firefox 3.5.7.

  In Internet Explorer 8, everything seems fine.

  Help, pls.

  Problem solved.

  NoScript Firefox addon was guilty.

  It automatically blocks goole.com scripts.

  After the activation of google in noscript standard display GMail works again.

• Router dual-band only invited E3200 access works

  Hello, I am looking for help on my router.  Today my main band has stopped working and I can not connect.  I tried to change the password and am still unable to connect, and can't even get an option to enter the new password to other devices, even if the signal is recognized.  My guest access works very well.  Can anyone help?

  Yes, the router behind router can be a bit confusing, but I think you're in luck because the E3200 supports bridge mode.

  Simply follow the instructions to configure your E3200 in Bridge mode.

  http://www6.nohold.NET/Cisco2/GetArticle.aspx?docid=28cee6a2fb0d4176a2210942d1d5836c_Setting_up_the _...

  The alternative if you want to use your E3200 as the main router is to set your modem in Bridge mode, if it is able.

• Very strange Vista problem when behind a switch

  I bought the router WRT610N along a LINKSYS EG008W 10/100/1000Mbps Gigabit Workgroup Switch. In my small office (4 closed offices and an area central + kitchen + room + storage + a bowl of chocolate for my pregnant wife), we were using our ISP (Bell) modem/router (Wi - Fi + 4 ports RJ-45) with switch 8 old ports. There are 3 Mackintosh a XP and a Vista workstations and a D - Link DNS-323 NAS on the local network, + XP/Vista/Mac laptop wireless now and then. I wanted to update our stuff for a flow rate of localized Gigabyte (still looking autour to build a Xeon server + file server), with Wireless N Dual-Band, and the following configuration has worked right away without installing anything same software-wise, nor the need to reset - restart a computer or device: all records shared Internet connection was available immediately which was very satisfying. I even bought Cisco Network Magic Pro 5.5 and I'm glad I did, this is a really well done and intuitive graphic interface to manage small business networks (one license for PC stations up to 8 + 8 Mac stations), if not the best out there for its target market niche and prices vary.

  However, there is a confused about Vista glitch: I have to fix directly on one of the ports on the WRT610N, it won't work if I try behind a switch box (although it works for all other operating systems), using the following network configuration:

  1. all the workstations are connected to the switch, focused on one of the ports of WRT610N
  2. The Internet WRT610N port Bell's DSL modem
  3. SIN D - Link DNS - 323 and the port 3 WRT610N
  4. EG008W Switch 4 port WRT610N 1 port
  5. Workstation to the switch EG008W 2 Vista port
  6. Workstation XP and switch EG008W 3 port
  7. Workstations Mac to switch EG008W ports 1, 5, and 6

  From the XP desktop, I see Macs and access the NAS. From a Mac, I can see + access the XP and the NAS. Vista station connects any behind the switch EG008W: I * must * plug into the router, WRT610N, something I don't want to because the switch is there to serve as a wall mounted RJ45 plugs into each office (where the Mac XP and Vista workstations are located)... Any help or link to a relevant reference would be greatly appreciated.

  Kevj, thanks for answer you, I came here to close the topic because I put the finger on the problem and it is resolved: the problem lies elsewhere, it is not the calbling or some other hardware problem. I have replace the Vista box by a mobile XP, using the same wiring right and everything worked well, he wasn't a wiring problem... Note that the workstation is a Dell Studio which comes with a Realteck Gigabit controller box (so I guess that many other models/brands also provide this same controller, which means that many other users can know this problem).

  Here's what I did:

  • I got rid of Vista by installing Windows 7 and everything worked fine!
  • I then published an update of Windows from the Microsoft site, which offered a patch for the familly Realteck GBE (among other patches) controller
  • After restarting the computer, the network was not accessible more while the Win7 box is behind the Swithcher: it behaved exactly as when it was Vista (indicating that the adapter was unplugged when behind the selector and then giving access while behind router WRT)!
  • So I restored the last just restore point prior to the update of the controller and got everything back to normal; I then did another session of MS Windows Update without the Realteck driver patch, and everything worked well.

  Conclusion: DO NOT update your controller driver Realteck GBE from Microsoft, whether for Vista or Windows 7, it has a bug which takes place whenever your Vista/Win7 box is behind a DMZ sub-segment of LAN using a blender (switch-router-router/DSL-ISP).

  Note: the WRT610N works like a charm! It is plugged with a RAID0 of DNS-323 1 TB NAS, one 8-port Gigabit switch power supply 3 macs, 1 XP and 1 Windows 7, Wi - FI works well enough (G mode, while the band n is open - I don't have a camera of 5 GHz yet so I can't say for this FREQUENCY range) and I left the own DSL access available Point. Which means that there are 3 Access Points: one directly on the DSL router that leaves the LAN in a DMZ (cannot be seen or accessed from the mobile) and 2 more on the WRT610N dual band access not only to the Internet but also for shared resources). Blue color for the port connected to the dwitcher, which means a Gigabit local LAN, and green port for the DNS-323 whitch works to 100 MB (unfortunately they still do not have a Gigabit NAS). I am very happy with the product, more when combined with Network Magic Pro.

• I get the error message on debugging ipsec-l2l tunnel

  Hello

  Can someone help me understand the debug message?
  I get the error message on debugging ipsec-l2l tunnel

  I tried to configure an ASA5520 with an ipsec-l2l to ios router 1721

  = 1721 router =.

  Cisco 1721 (flash: c1700-k9o3sy7 - mz.123 - 2.XC2.bin)
  80.89.47.102 outside
  inside 10.100.110.1 255.255.255.0

  Debug crypto ipsec
  Debug crypto ISAKMP

  -config-
  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  0 1234567890 128.39.189.10 crypto isakmp key address
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des pix-series
  !
  ASA 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  defined by peer 128.39.189.10
  transform-set pix - Set
  match address 101
  !
  !
  interface FastEthernet0

  Outside-interface description

  IP 80.89.47.102 255.255.255.252

  NAT outside IP

  card crypto asa

  !

  interface Vlan10
  Inside description
  IP 10.100.110.1 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside

  !

  !

  IP nat inside source overload map route interface FastEthernet0 sheep

  !

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.100.110.0 0.0.0.255 10.100.4.0 0.0.3.255

  !

  access-list 110 deny ip 10.100.110.0 0.0.0.255 10.100.4.0 0.0.3.255
  access-list 110 permit ip 10.100.110.0 0.0.0.255 any
  !
  sheep allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 110
  !

  = Config ASA =.

  Cisco 5520 ASA Version 8.2 (1)
  128.39.189.10 outside
  inside 10.100.4.255 255.255.252.0

  Debug crypto ipsec
  Debug crypto ISAKMP

  -Config-
  !
  Allow Access-list extended sheep 255.255.252.0 IP 10.100.4.0 10.100.110.0 255.255.255.0
  !
  access extensive list ip 10.100.4.0 outside110 allow 255.255.252.0 10.100.110.0 255.255.255.0
  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
  86400 seconds, duration of life crypto ipsec security association
  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
  card crypto outside_map 11 match address outside110
  peer set card crypto outside_map 11 80.89.47.102
  card crypto outside_map 11 game of transformation-ESP-3DES-MD5
  outside_map interface card crypto outside
  crypto ISAKMP allow outside
  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  preshared authentication
  3des encryption
  md5 hash
  Group 2
  life 86400

  !

  attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
  VPN-idle-timeout no
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  !

  tunnel-group 80.89.47.102 type ipsec-l2l
  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 80.89.47.102
  pre-shared key 1234567890

  Concerning
  Tor

  You have a transformation defined on the SAA named ESP-3DES-MD5? Your crypto card refers to that but I don't see it listed in the config you have posted. I don't have much experience with routers, but is MD5 hashing algoritm (and why it is not)?

  James

• VPN router to the problem of the ASA

  Hello world.

  I am doing a VPN between a router and a series of ASA5500 and difficulties.

  The router part is 100% correct because it is a daily task, but miss me something on the side of the ASA of the things.

  The ASA also has remote via IPsec tunnels clients as you'll see below, so I have to make sure that continues to work!

  It is a fairly urgent question. So any help or advice can be provided, it would be very appreciated!

  Here is the router part:

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  isakmp encryption key * ASA-PUBLIC-IP address

  ISAKMP crypto keepalive 100

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac

  !

  10 customers map ipsec-isakmp crypto

  defined ASA-PUBLIC-IP peer

  transform-set transform-Set

  match address 102

  QoS before filing

  !

  !

  Access-list 100 remark [== NAT control ==]

  access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 any

  Access-list 102 remark == [VPN access LISTS] ==

  access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255

  Access-list 102 remark

  (Crypto card has been applied to the corresponding interface)

  SIDE OF THE ASA:

  permit inside_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.192 255.255.255.224

  prevpn_splitTunnelAcl list standard access allowed 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list Interior-access-in extended permit ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 any

  access-list Interior-access-in extended permit icmp 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 any

  access list for distance-extended permitted ip network 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0

  Global (outside) 1 ASA-PUBLIC-IP

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound

  NAT (inside) 1 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto-map dynamic outside_dyn_map 20 the transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 value

  card crypto outside_map 40 match remote-network address

  card crypto outside_map 40 game peers REMOTE-router-IP

  outside_map card crypto 40 the transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 value

  map outside_map 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic outside_dyn_map

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  ISAKMP allows outside

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

  ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption

  ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

  10 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

  tunnel-group prevpn type ipsec-ra

  tunnel-group prevpn General-attributes

  address pool VPN-pool

  Group Policy - by default-prevpn

  prevpn group of tunnel ipsec-attributes

  pre-shared-key *.

  tunnel-group REMOTE-router-IP type ipsec-l2l

  REMOTE-router-IP tunnel-group ipsec-attributes

  pre-shared-key *.

  Hi Chris

  first on the router make this change to littil than u ned to add md5 as hashing whil employees u th in the asa and the router u did not, so the default is sha!

  do

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  md5 hash

  now on the SAA as I see that there is a problem in nat0 you line l2l tunnel

  so that you need to look like:

  permit inside_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0

  You also need a permit for the ipsec traffic, the following command will allow all ipsec traffic if you want to filter traffic not to use this command and use rather ACLs on the external interface, but following that to allow all traffic to your L2L and remote vpn access:

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  so, please:

  clear xlate and reload the ASA then attempt to leave the expmtion NAT new effects

  Good luck

  If useful rates

• Lor on wrt1900ac flow?

  Recently, I have raised a ticket with my ISP to tell don't reach is not my bamdwith contraxt. I have 120 MB of up and down. On speed tests I have abt 55 scope consistentluly to the top and 150 down. It seems that my wrt1900ac is the culprit:
  -all tests must be carried out by cat6 cable
  -a test when it is connected directly to the modem/vocations ISPs give you 150 upstairs and downstairs
  -If I put my pc behind my linksys (which is the router behind router of the Internet service provider), I get aforentioned low download
  -copy of files in my local network (nas to pc) gives 700 MB
  -all switches are linksys gigabit switches

  What's happening here? Is it normal that my traffic loses speed so just browsing through my router side wan side lan?

  Enable the prioritization of media and configure it correctly:
  Activate the Support WMM
  The maximum value that your ISP provides you with the value Downstream\Bandwidth. # x 1024 = # value to enter the area downstream.
  http://www.Linksys.com/us/support-article?articleNum=138353
  http://www.Linksys.com/us/support-article?articleNum=156271

• Subnetting RV042

  Hello

  I'm trying to implement a subnet 2 with two routers RV042. A router will act as a bridge and the two WAN ports will be used by two different isp connection. The first router (gateway) IP LAN will be 192.168.0.1/24.

  I also want to set up another router behind router modem with different subnet 192.168.1.X/24. And I would that the customers of the 192.168.1.x subnet that you want to use the internet through the gateway router and the 192.168.0.x subnet clients to access resources on the 192.168.1.x subnet. I am able to do it with two RV042?

  Hello.

  These products are processed by the Cisco Small Business Support Community.

  * If my post answered your question, please mark it as "acceptable Solution".

  Thank you!

• Loopback Interface client endpoint VPN Site

  My project consists of 871 router connected to the router soho 3845 network head on the MPLS network unencrypted for data communication. For the Client PC behind router 871 on remote site, they need activate the Cisco VPN client and connect to headend 3845 so that they can access information behind the main switch 6506.

  To reduce to a minimum the installation, I would like to prepare a unique VPN profile for all remote controls. So, I plan on using lo0 int for the VPN endpoint. However, I have found that when the VPN connection is in place on the int lo0, the remote client computer can 'ping' lo0 only, but can not 'ping' all other IP addresses. However, when I set up the connection to the IP address on router 3845, the connection is ok.

  I have attached my config for the VPN and the diagram. Can anyone help?

  Hello

  You need to change your ACL split tunnel:

  FEHD_VPN extended IP access list

  Note * outbound VPN client traffic *.

  IP 10.0.0.0 allow 0.255.255.255 10.65.215.0 0.0.0.255

  Note: Do not know what is the purpose of "allowed host ip host 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.