L2l VPN between two ASA5505 works not

Similar Questions

• Easy VPN between two ASA 9.5 - Split tunnel does not

  Hi guys,.

  We have set up a site to site vpn using easy configuration vpn between ver 9.5 race (1) two ASA. The tunnels are up and ping is reached between sites. I also configured split tunnel for internet traffic under the overall strategy of the ASA easy vpn server. But for some unknown reason all the customer same internet traffic is sent to the primary site. I have configured NAT to relieve on the side of server and client-side. Please advise if no limitation so that the installation program.

  Thank you and best regards,

  Arjun T P

  I have the same question and open a support case.

  It's a bug in the software 9.5.1. See the bug: CSCuw22886

• ASA 5505 - I can't create an IPSEC VPN between two ASA 5505

  Hello

  I have two ASA 5505 with basic license and I'm trying to create a VPN IPSEC using the CLI. Here are the steps I did:

  1 Configure ASA-1 (host name, vlan 1 and vlan 2).

  2. configure a static route

  3. create object network (local and remote)

  4. create the access list

  5. create ikev1 crypto

  6. create tunnel-group

  7 Configure nat

  and I repeat the steps above with the ASA but another change IP.

  Are to correct the above steps?

  Why can I not create an IPSEC VPN between devices?.

  No, you needn't. The ASA configuration is ok. Packet trace proved it. I think it can be a problem on the hosts. Please, check the firewall on the PC and try to put out of service, if it is running.

• IPsec VPN between two routers - mode ESP Transport and Tunnel mode

  Hi experts,

  I have this question about the Transport mode and Tunnel mode for awhile.

  Based on my understanding of 'Transport' mode is not possible because you always original "internal" private in the IP headers or IP addresses. They are always different as public IP on interfaces enabled with Crypto Card addresses. When encapsulated in the VPN tunnel, the internal IP addresses must be included or the remote VPN router won't know where to forward the packet.

  To test, I built a simple GNS3 with three routers laboratory. R1 and R3 are configured as VPN routers and the R2 must simulate Internet.

  My configs are also very basic. The R2 is routing between 1.1.1.0/24 and 2.2.2.0/24. It is defined as the gateway of R1 and R3.

  R1:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 100
  BA aes
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto key 123456 address 2.2.2.2
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP_null null esp esp-sha-hmac
  !
  10 map ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  defined peer 2.2.2.2
  transformation-ESP_null game
  match address VPN

  !

  list of IP - VPN access scope
  ip permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
  !

  R3:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 100
  BA aes
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto key 123456 address 1.1.1.2
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP_null null esp esp-sha-hmac
  !
  10 map ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  defined peer 1.1.1.2
  transformation-ESP_null game
  match address VPN

  !

  list of IP - VPN access scope
  Licensing ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  I configured transform-"null" value, while it will not encrypt the traffic.

  Then I tried the two 'transport' mode and mode "tunnel". I ping a host in the internal network of the R1 to another host in the internal network of the R3. I also tried 'telnet'. I also captured packets and carefully compared in both modes.

  Packets encapsulated in exactly the same way!

  It's just SPI + sequence No. + + padding

  I will attach my screenshots here for you guys to analyze it. I would be grateful for any explanation. I confused maybe just when it comes to the NAT...

  I guess my next step is to check if the two modes to make the difference when the GRE is used.

  Thank you

  Difan

  Hi Difan,

  As you point out the mode of transport is not always applicable (i.e. applicable if IP source and destination is equal to corresnpoding proxy IDs).

  A typical scenario in this mode of transport is used:

  -Encryption between two hosts

  -GRE tunnels

  -L2TP over IPsec

  Even if you set "transport mode" this does not mean that it will be used. IOS routers and I blieve also ASA will perform backup even if the mode of transport is configured but does not apply in tunnel mode.

  I can take a look at your traces to sniff, but all first can you please check if you transport mode on your ipsec security associations? "See the crypto ipsec his" exit you will show the tunnel or transport mode.

  HTH,

  Marcin

• L2l VPN between ASA with the IP address public and CISCO2911 behind the ISP router with port forwarding

  Hi all

  My apologies if this is a trivial question, but I spent considerable time trying to search and had no luck.

  I encountered a problem trying to set up a temporary L2L VPN from a Subscriber with CISCO2911 sitting behind the router of the ISP of an ASA. ISP has informed that I can't ignore their device and complete the circuit Internet on the Cisco for a reason, so I'm stuck with it. The Setup is:

  company 10.1.17.1 - y.y.y.y - router Internet - z.z.z.z - ISP - LAN - 10.x.x.2 - XXX1 - ASA - 10.1.17.2 - CISCO2911 - 10.1.15.1 LAN

  where 10.x.x.x is a corporate LAN Beach private network, y.y.y.y is a public ip address assigned to the external interface of the ASA and the z.z.z.z is the public IP address of the ISP router.

  I have forwarded ports 500, 4500 and ESP on the ISP router for 10.1.17.2. The 2911 config attached below, what I can't understand is what peer IP address to configure on the SAA, because if I use z.z.z.z it will be a cause of incompatibility of identity 2911 identifies himself as 10.1.17.2...

  ! ^ ^ ^ ISAKMP (Phase 1) ^ ^ ^!
  crypto ISAKMP policy 5
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  lifetime 28800
  isakmp encryption key * address no.-xauth y.y.y.y

  ! ^ ^ ^ IPSEC (Phase 2) ^ ^ ^!
  crymap extended IP access list
  IP 10.1.15.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA 3rd-esp esp-sha-hmac
  card crypto 1 TUNNEL VPN ipsec-isakmp
  defined peer y.y.y.y
  game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
  match the address crymap

  Gi0/2 interface
  card crypto VPN TUNNEL

  Hello

  debug output, it seems he's going on IPSEC States at the tunnel of final bud QM_IDLE's.

  What I noticed in your configuration of ASA box, it's that you're usig PFS but not on 2911 router.

  So I suggest:

  no card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 don't set pfs <-- this="" will="" disable="" pfs="" on="" asa="">

  Then try tunnel initiate.

  Kind regards

  Jan

• Space between two words is not properly considered by WXE_AdjacentSpace!

  Hi, in my acrobat plugin, use the following line to judge if there is a space between two words as based on what I have to join two words.

  attrWord = PDWordGetAttr (pdWord);

  bHasAdjacentSpace = (attrWord & WXE_AdjacentSpace);

  But for the two words in a particular PDF document, it gives a correct result. Although visually, I see that there is a space between these words, but the above method means that there is NO space between the two.

  Could you please let me know what's going wrong here?

  Or if is there any other way to judge precisely the space between the two words, and if they need to be joined or not?

  You can get the bounding box (Quads) for each word you get home and they take your own decision as to the amount of white space is acceptable to join to...

• Tunnel VPN between two Cisco ASA5505 drops every 15-30 minutes

  authentication attempts but never reconnects.  I have to restart the app

  dence to back tunnel.

  In syslogs, found the following:

  2010-07-07 13:28:34 Local4.Notice 10.0.0.254: Jul 07 10:22:22 UTC: % ASA-vpn-5-713259: Group = 74.126.85.149, IP = 74.126.85.149, Session is be demolished. Reason: Service lost
  2010-07-07 13:28:34 Local4.Warning 10.0.0.254: Jul 07 10:22:22 UTC: % ASA-auth-4-113019: Group = 74.126.85.149 username = 74.126.85.149, IP = 74.126.85.149, disconnected Session. Session type: IPsec, duration: 0 h: 36 m: 03 s, xmt bytes: 584567664, RRs bytes: 156692759, reason: Service lost

  David,

  Indeed, this might be the reason.

  Any chance you can apply some kind of formatting? (Comes from bad to worse ASA can do very decently, but only in the outbound direction AFAIR)

  Marcin

• Share music between two people, but not to play count

  My iTunes library, I have more than 1000 songs. My library has increased since I got an iPod a few years ago, and now I listen to it 24/7 on my iPad. My brother and I have same taste of music, and he always listened to what I played when it was not a device. When I got my iPad, let him have my iPod, so we both had the same library (it is not yet have his own account), and our devices to sync past computer game account between our devices.

  As we grew up, he developed more than taste in classical music, particularly the soundtracks, I. That's fine, but he listens so that he starts to spoil some smart playlists that I have running on the game account. He no longer has the iPod, he listens just to music off of the iTunes library on your laptop, and I still have my iPad.

  My question is this: is there a way for us to have the same music but have his game will not carry more on my iPad? Better yet, have the same starting point for the music, but have any new music classic it does not add to move on my iPad but I add that he can still listen to the music? Something in this direction?

  If he needs to make an account to do this, it is fine. Have looked at the "creation of new libraries' and such, I am not quite knowledgeable on the subject. Everything that makes something like this possible would be much appreciated!

  Thoughts?

  If he has his own computer and simply listen to music via iTunes on this computer, then it should be possible.

  You can activate Sharing host iTunes on your computer and allow his computer to connect via iTunes home sharing of your library. He will then be able to navigate and play the tracks in your library. In iTunes home sharing preferences is an option to play counties puts is not up to date.

  If the two of you use the same computer maybe it's not feasible.

• VPN between two computers xp via a dsl connection

  Is it possible to remotely connect to two computers xp via a dsl connection? Using vpn

  Hello

  To establish a VPN connection must act as a VPN server.

  There are hardware devices (such as some routers) that can do the job.

  Or try this, http://www.aeonity.com/frost/howto-windows-xp-vpn-server-setup

• CS6: Unique black frame between two elements should not be here...

  Hello

  I hope that someone will be able to answer this question.

  I have two clips in my calendar that I broke together, on the timeline there seems to be a gap and still when I advance frame by frame a single black frame appears.

  I tried to cut a frame outside each of the clips but the black frame always appears.

  Here are a few screenshots to clarify (I'm completely on the timeline zoom).

  It is the last image before the split

  This is where the two clips join

  It is the first image after the split

  I would appreciate any help/advice anyone can offer!

  P.s. I'm under first CS6 on Mac OSX 10.8.3 (Mountain Lion)

  Thank you!

  A recent discussion with a similar problem:

  Stabilizing warp CS6 scales down to the last image

  http://forums.Adobe.com/message/5170132

• How backup VPN configuration between two universities?

  Hello, I am a student of the Greece and I have a graduation project to configure Backup VPN between two universities. Principal of communication made with leased lines. I study a lot, but now that it's time for implementation I have some thoughts:

  -What hardware and software IOS do I need? Cisco 1841 it is ok for A & D routers?

  -Use GRE IPSec transport mode or IPsec Tunnel mode?

  -What will be the failover mechanism for switching traffic lines leased to IP VPN Backup and opposite? A teacher told me something about the Interface Prioritys. I read somewhere that this is done with the such as EIGRP routing protocol. who was right the Professor or the book?  :-D

  -In the same place, they have Firewall and NAT, I need to do any action for this?

  The attached file contains topology I want to implement

  'My' talk site 1

  2 a Central Site

  E communicates with A, but no traffic is to A of E with normal circumstances. Subnet on E access Internet through F, then press D.    VPN will be implemented on the LAN but the specific source E traffic will pass through the Backdoor VPN (I think that the solution to this is ACL on the router). They have no routing protocol in 'my' site A directly connected routers and the default routes.

  How imlement this?

  I think the first thing to do is A to D connectivity

  I will try to do this to tracers package first, but how can ' I imitate the SP network?

  I need help I can get!

  Hi John,.

  In our scenario, given that our main connection is a direct leased line between E and F, so I guess there is no other network between the two routers. In this case we do not need to configure SLA monitoring or any interface a priority. We can simply enter two default routes:

  IP route

  IP route 254

  In this scenario, if the leased line interface goes down, the second default route is used and the traffic should be routed by A router.

  SLA monitoring monitors connection (using the ping tests) by one of the interfaces of the router, and when we are not able to ping from one server (specified in the configuration of the SLA) through the interface, then we change the default track to track traffic through some other interface.

  So, in your scenario, we can monitor the connection between E and F, and when the link goes down, we can change the default route to point a.

  This is useful in the scenario where we have another ISP connection as our primary connection.

  Here is a link on how to configure SLA monitoring on the router:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_4/ip_sla/configuration/guide/hsicmp.html

  After you have configured the SLA followed by using the link above, you can bind it to the default route by using the following command line:

  track road IP / / default main route

  IP route 255 / / default route with a metric of higer that comes into play when the main default route goes down

  In addition, the sample configuration that you give in the doc is almost correct, defined transformation is missing just a hashing algorithm. Here is a link with an example for a tunnel from lan-to-lan between two routers:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/HW/routers/ps221/products_configuration_example09186a008073e078.shtml

• TreeView: Line white between the two nodes are not appear

  Hi all

  I added a treeview control in my dialog plugin for InDesign CS3 and CS4.

  In CS4, it works fine but in CS3, I get a strange question.

  Question: A blank line between two nodes may not appear. See the image below

  I am referring to the white line which we can see in the InDesign paragraph style palette / all indesign sample as the Board treeview as shown below

  I tried this problem but has not found a solution

  Please help me solve this problem.

  Kind regards

  Alam

  I had a similar problem, but in the end, I couldn't figure how to remove the white lines.

  I have given up trying to remove the white and just changed the color of the treeview and everything that was drawn on the top in white.

  It was the only way I managed to hide lines.

• VPN between 2 routers Cisco 1841 (LAN to LAN)

  Hello

  I need to connect two offices (two different LAN) using routers cisco 1841 at both ends.

  Currently the two cisco router are in working condition and refer the internet LAN clients. (making the NAT).

  Can someone please tell us what is the easiest way to set up a VPN between two sites, so that LAN users to an office to access mail servers electronic/request to the office LAN.

  I understand that I need IPSec Site to Site VPN (I think).

  Anyonce can you please advise.

  Kind regards.

  s.nasheet wrote:
  Hi ,
  I need to connect two offices ( two different LAN's) together using cisco 1841 routers at both end.
  Currently both cisco router are in working order and  acting as a internet gateway to the LAN clients. ( doing NAT).
  Can anybody please advise what is the easiest method to configure VPN between two sites so that  LAN users at one office be able to access  the  email/application servers at the other LAN office.
  I understand I need IPSec Site to Site VPN  ( i think).
  Can anyonce please advise.
  Regards.
  

  Yes, you need a VPN site-to site. Start with this link which gives a number of examples to set up a VPN S2S between 2 routers Cisco.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/tech_configuration_examples_list.html#anchor16

  Jon

• How can I use VPN to access my work files?

  Original title: VPN connection... then what?

  Our IT consultant gave me a procedure to set up a VPN between home and work.  I can establish a VPN connection now.  I can see the handshake of communication by the illustration.  All this is well and good, but how use VPN to access my work files?  In Logmein, I get a screen that remotes me to my work PC.  With VPN I get nothing.

  Hello

  Your question of Windows 7 is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the Technet Forum.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Windows/en-us/home?Forum=w7itprogeneral

  I hope this helps.

• VPN-&gt; ASA1 &lt; - l2l Tunnel - &gt; client-&gt; Service ASA2 will not work?

  Hello

  I have spent a lot of time with this problem, but I have not found a working configuration. I sound so simple, but nothing seems to work.

  We have a Site 2 Site tunnel established between two ASA 5505, in the network 'ASA2, 192.168.33.0/24' a terminal server server is located.

  A warrior of the road the VPN user connects to the network 'ASA1, 192.168.0.0/24' using the Cisco VPN Client. It is able to connect to its network services, but not the services that are found in the ASA2 network. The log file is clean, without drops.

  The client shows stats both networks secure routes.

  I'm blind for the solution, or is this not possible?

  Someone has an int for me?

  Best regards

  Markus

  Looks like you need to configure 192.168.0.0/24 within the field of encryption for the tunnel between ASA 1 with the ASA2 L2L.

  You must configure the user of warrior to also encrypt the traffic to the ASA2 network.

  You must activate the same communication intra-interface security, so that traffic can enter ASA 1, then let ASA 1 ASA 2 on the same outside the interface.

  HTH >