L2TP/IPSec and VRRP on Cisco VPN3000

Hello. I don't know if this is the right forum, please excuse me if this is not (of course a pointer to the right we'd appreciate it :)

I'm experimenting with the implementation of VPN 3000 Concentrator series VRRP, and it seems that when the unit of "backup" takes over, no L2TP/IPsec tunnel can be established more.

When the switch takes place, the backup device takes over VRRP group IP addresses, which are the IP address of the master own as well on VPN 3000. Thus, the backup unit manages two different IP addresses, its own ad group.

Well, what I observed using a sniffer is that while the IKE/IPSec packets come well to the group address, L2TP packets are by IP address of the backup device physical and clear instead of be encapsulated in IPSec travel packages. The client computer (PC Windows 2000) clearly ignores the L2TP packets and no L2TP/Ipsec tunnel can be established. PPTP tunnels work, however.

The foregoing does not occur when the VPN 3000 master works, like the VRRP group addresses are the same as its own interface addresses.

Now, VPN 3000 documentation or TAC documents explicitly say that L2TP/IPSec and VRRP are incompatible, but they do not mention compatibility as well (although they do mention the VRRP Protocol PPTP compatibility).

Did someone better informed than me? Is there a technical reason for the incompatibility between L2TP with VRRP, or it's a bug any?

Thank you

Roberto Patriarca

This has proved quite recently and a high severity bug has been open about it and is currently under review.

See http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCeb77328&Submit=Search for more details.

Nice work well in the survey.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • L2TP/ipsec passthrough firewall of cisco router

    Hello! I have the following problem.

    External network users wish to connect internal Windows to network and share resources 2012 (start the software, files, etc)

    So it's time to deploy a vpn server and as I did not have a free license to run on my windows 2012, I decided to use my qnap for it (because it has this built-in feature) so I chose l2tp/ipsec and tested on the laboratory at home with simple tplink router with upnp function and it worked like a charm.

    However, in the real production environment, I need to use the cisco router, and this is how the story begins ;)

    Thus, clients with their machines say (7, 8.1, 10) must pass router cisco (with nat) firewall and access a vpn server and the internal network on qnap.

    I googled for sample configuration, but most of them related to the configuration of the router as a vpn server, and I want to achieve is to make my pass router vpn traffic. Once I found the same sample of pptp config, I have modified it a bit, but do not know if it works because I have not yet tested.

    In any case, could you check my config and see if it's ok? I'm doing a static nat for vpn 192.168.5.253 server to external address?

    Also, here is a short pattern

    vpn client VPN server (win 7,8,10)---routeur cisco 1921 - qnap)

    xxx.194 cloud 5,254 5.253 (internal network)

    test #show runn
    Building configuration...

    Current configuration: 3611 bytes
    !
    ! Last modified at 19:31:01 UTC Wednesday, may 4, 2016 configuration by
    !
    version 15.4
    horodateurs service debug datetime msec
    Log service timestamps datetime msec
    encryption password service
    !
    hostname test
    !
    boot-start-marker
    boot-end-marker
    !
    !
    enable secret $5
    !
    No aaa new-model
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    DHCP excluded-address IP 192.168.5.200 192.168.5.254
    DHCP excluded-address IP 192.168.5.1 192.168.5.189
    !
    pool dhcp IP network
    network 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0
    router by default - 192.168.5.254
    network domain name
    xxx.x.xxx.244 DNS server
    !
    !
    !
    IP domain name temp
    IP cef
    No ipv6 cef
    !
    Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
    !
    CTS verbose logging
    !
    !
    license udi pid CISCO1921/K9 sn xxxxxx
    licence start-up module c1900 technology-package securityk9
    !
    !
    username secret abc 5
    username privilege 15 7 cisco password
    !
    redundancy
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    property intellectual ssh version 2
    !
    type of class-card inspect entire game cm_helpdek_protocols
    http protocol game
    https protocol game
    ssh protocol game
    type of class-card inspect entire game cm_gre_protocols
    Access-group name WILL
    type of class-card inspect entire game cm_icmp
    group-access icmp name game
    type of class-card inspect the correspondence cm_helpdesk
    match the name of group-access helpdesk
    type of class-card inspect entire game inside_to_outside
    h323 Protocol game
    match Protocol pptp
    ftp protocol game
    tcp protocol match
    udp Protocol game
    match icmp Protocol
    !
    type of policy-card inspect pm_outside_to_inside
    class type inspect cm_gre_protocols
    Pass
    class type inspect cm_icmp
    inspect
    class type inspect cm_helpdesk
    inspect
    class class by default
    Drop newspaper
    type of policy-card inspect pm_inside_to_outside
    class type inspect inside_to_outside
    inspect
    class type inspect cm_gre_protocols
    Pass
    class class by default
    Drop newspaper
    !
    area inside security
    Description inside the zone of confidence
    security of the outside area
    Outside the untrusted area description
    source of zonep_insiede_to_outside security pair area inside the destination outside
    type of service-strategy inspect pm_inside_to_outside
    source of zonep_outside_to_inside security zone-pair outside the destination inside
    type of service-strategy inspect pm_outside_to_inside
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    the Embedded-Service-Engine0/0 interface
    no ip address
    Shutdown
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet0/0
    Description 'LAN '.
    IP 192.168.5.254 255.255.255.0
    IP nat inside
    IP virtual-reassembly in
    security of the inside members area
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    !
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    Description "WAN CID: xxxxx".
    IP address xxx.xxx.xxx.194 255.255.255.252
    NAT outside IP
    IP virtual-reassembly in
    security of the outside Member area
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    !
    IP forward-Protocol ND
    !
    IP http server
    local IP http authentication
    no ip http secure server
    !
    IP nat pool network xxx.xxx.xxx.201 xxx.xxx.xxx.201 netmask 255.255.255.248
    IP nat inside source list 1 pool overload the network
    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.193
    !
    GRE extended IP access list
    Note ACL to allow ACCORD of PPTP OUTBOUND
    allow a gre
    permit any any eq udp 1701
    allow udp any any eq isakmp
    permit any any eq non500-isakmp udp
    helpdesk extended IP access list
    IP enable any host 192.168.5.253
    icmp extended IP access list
    allow icmp any host 192.168.5.253
    !
    !
    !
    access-list 1 permit 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255
    !
    control plan
    !
    !
    !
    Line con 0
    local connection
    line to 0
    line 2
    no activation-character
    No exec
    preferred no transport
    transport output pad telnet, rlogin xxxxx
    StopBits 1
    line vty 0 4
    local connection
    transport input telnet ssh
    !
    Scheduler allocate 20000 1000
    !
    end

    Kind regards

    Andrew

    Once the client has been connected to the VPN, you want traffic back to flow to the client. Which can be easily received with "inspect".

    And from the point of view of the firewall, you do not have ESP-traffic (which would be the IP/50). You have only UDP traffic (initially UDP/500 which goes into UDP/4500)

    And you are right with your last ACE. That of a lot to permissive and not necessary for this function.

  • AC100 - no VPN L2TP/IPSec PSK available

    Android 2.2 (Froyo) devices show for VPN connections the following possibilities: PPTP, L2TP, PSK L2TP/IPSec and L2TP/IPSec CRT (checked on several brands of smartphones).

    The AC100 appears only from any PPTP and L2TP, so not L2TP/IPSec.

    No idea why they are missing, and how to fix this?

    Need for L2TP/IPSec to a VPN with a Sonicwall 3060/Pro.

    Here is a description how to connect: [https://www.fuzeqna.com/sonicwallkb/consumer/kbdetail.asp?kbid=8658]

    Hello

    AFAIK the L2TP/IPSec is only available for android devices routed.

    So maybe it's the reason why the L2TP/IPSec in unavailable for AC100.

    I found here a beautiful Android L2TP/IPSec VPN HowTo
    http://blogs.nopcode.org/brainstorm/2010/08/22/Android-l2tpipsec-VPN-mini-HOWTO/

    Maybe it might help a bit!

  • Press L2L VPN, IPSEC, and L2TP PIX connections

    Hi all

    I'm trying to implement a solution on my FW PIX (pix804 - 24.bin) to be able to support a VPN L2L session with VPN dynamic user sessions where clients will use a mix of IPSEC(Nat detection) and L2TP. We have always supported things IPSEC and that worked great for many years. I'm now trying to Add L2TP support, so that I can support Android phones/ipads, etc. as well as Windows with built in VPN l2tp clients clients. Everything works well except for the new features of L2TP. Allows you to complete one phase but then tries to use the card encryption that is used for the VPN L2L. It seems to fail because IP addresses are not in the configured ACL to the crypto-map L2L. Does anyone know if there are any questions all these configurations support both. And if not can you see what I have wrong here, which would make it not work. Here are the relevant training:

    C515 - A # sh run crypto
    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set of society-ras-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac company-l2tp
    life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
    Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
    Dynamic crypto map company-ras 1 correspondence address company-dynamic
    company Dynamics-card crypto-ras 1 set pfs
    Dynamic crypto map company-ras 1 transform-set ESP-SHA-3DES ESP-3DES-MD5 company-ras
    Dynamic crypto map company-ras 1 lifetime of security association set seconds 28800
    company Dynamics-card crypto-ras 1 kilobytes of life together - the association of safety 4608000
    crypto dynamic-map-ras company 2 address company-dynamic game
    crypto dynamic-map company-ras 2 transform-set of society-l2tp
    crypto dynamic-map company-ras 2 set security association lifetime seconds 28800
    company Dynamics-card crypto-ras 2 kilobytes of life together - the association of safety 4608000
    card crypto company-map 1 correspondence address company-colo
    card crypto company-card 1 set pfs
    card crypto company-card 1 set counterpart colo-pix-ext
    card crypto card company 1 value transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 SHA-ESP-3DES
    company-map 1 lifetime of security association set seconds 28800 crypto
    card company-card 1 set security-association life crypto kilobytes 4608000
    company-card 1 set nat-t-disable crypto card
    company-card 2 card crypto ipsec-isakmp dynamic company-ras
    business-card interface card crypto outside
    crypto isakmp identity address
    crypto ISAKMP allow outside

    Crypto isakmp nat-traversal 3600

    crypto ISAKMP policy 1
    preshared authentication
    3des encryption
    sha hash
    Group 2
    life 86400
    crypto ISAKMP policy 2
    preshared authentication
    3des encryption
    md5 hash
    Group 2
    life 86400
    C515 - A # sh run tunnel-group
    attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
    company-ras address pool
    Group-LOCAL radius authentication server
    Group Policy - by default-l2tp
    IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
    pre-shared-key *.
    tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup ppp-attributes
    PAP Authentication
    No chap authentication
    ms-chap-v2 authentication
    eap-proxy authentication
    type tunnel-group company-ras remote access
    tunnel-group global company-ras-attributes
    company-ras address pool
    Group-LOCAL radius authentication server
    tunnel-group company-ras ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *.
    type tunnel-group company-admin remote access
    attributes global-tunnel-group company-admin
    company-admin address pool
    Group-LOCAL radius authentication server
    company strategy-group-by default-admin
    IPSec-attributes of tunnel-group company-admin
    pre-shared-key *.
    PPP-attributes of tunnel-group company-admin
    No chap authentication
    ms-chap-v2 authentication
    tunnel-group x.x.x.x type ipsec-l2l
    tunnel-group ipsec-attributes x.x.x.x
    pre-shared-key *.
    ISAKMP keepalive retry threshold 15 10
    C515 - A # sh run Group Policy
    attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
    Server DNS 10.10.10.20 value 10.10.10.21
    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
    enable PFS
    Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    Split-tunnel-network-list value company-SPLIT-TUNNEL-ACL
    company.int value by default-field
    NAC-parameters DfltGrpPolicy-NAC-framework-create value
    internal strategy of company-admin group
    attributes of the strategy of company-admin group
    WINS server no
    DHCP-network-scope no
    VPN-access-hour no
    VPN - 20 simultaneous connections
    VPN-idle-timeout 30
    VPN-session-timeout no
    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec
    disable the IP-comp
    Re-xauth disable
    Group-lock no
    enable PFS
    Split-tunnel-network-list value company-ADMIN-SPLIT-TUNNEL-ACL
    L2TP strategy of Group internal
    Group l2tp policy attributes
    Server DNS 10.10.10.20 value 10.10.10.21
    Protocol-tunnel-VPN l2tp ipsec
    disable the PFS
    Split-tunnel-policy tunnelall
    company.int value by default-field
    NAC-parameters DfltGrpPolicy-NAC-framework-create value

    Relevant debug output

    C515 - Has # Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 66.25.14.195, Oakley proposal is acceptable
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 66.25.14.195, IKE Peer included IKE fragmentation capability flags: Main Mode: real aggressive Mode: false
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 66.25.14.195, IKE SA proposal # 1, turn # 1 entry IKE acceptable Matches # 3 overall
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, status of automatic NAT detection: remote endpoint IS behind a NAT device this end is NOT behind a NAT device
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, previously allocated memory of liberation for permission-dn-attributes
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, for this connection Keep-alive type: None
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, Keep-alives configured on, but the peer does not support persistent (type = None)
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, timer to generate a new key to start P1: 21600 seconds.
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, data received in payload ID remote Proxy Host: address 172.16.0.104 17 of the Protocol, Port 0
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, data received in payload ID local Proxy Host: address x.x.x.x, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, detected L2TP/IPSec session.
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, QM IsRekeyed its not found old addr
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, static check card Crypto, check card company card, seq = 1 =...
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, static check card Crypto card = company-map, seq = 1, ACL does not proxy IDs src:66.25.14.195 dst: x.x.x.x
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, tunnel IPSec rejecting: no entry for crypto for proxy card proxy remote 66.25.14.195/255.255.255.255/17/0 local x.x.x.x/255.255.255.255/17/1701 on the outside interface
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x501c1f0, mess id 0xa181b866).
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, case of mistaken IKE responder QM WSF (struct & 0x501c1f0) , : QM_DONE EV_ERROR--> QM_BLD_MSG2 EV_NEGO_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_IS_REKEY--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_CONFIRM_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_PROC_MSG--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_HASH_OK--> QM_BLD_MSG2, NullEvent--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_COMP_HASH
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, peer table correlator Removing failed, no match!
    Sep 03 02:09:33 [IKEv1]: ignoring msg SA brand with Iddm 204910592 dead because ITS removal
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 66.25.14.195, Oakley proposal is acceptable
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 66.25.14.195, IKE Peer included IKE fragmentation capability flags: Main Mode: real aggressive Mode: false
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 66.25.14.195, IKE SA proposal # 1, turn # 1 entry IKE acceptable Matches # 3 overall
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup

    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, status of automatic NAT detection: remote endpoint IS behind a NAT device this end is NOT behind a NAT device
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, previously allocated memory of liberation for permission-dn-attributes
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, for this connection Keep-alive type: None
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: IP = 66.25.14.195, Keep-alives configured on, but the peer does not support persistent (type = None)
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, timer to generate a new key to start P1: 21600 seconds.
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, data received in payload ID remote Proxy Host: address 172.16.0.104 17 of the Protocol, Port 0
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, data received in payload ID local Proxy Host: address x.x.x.x, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, detected L2TP/IPSec session.
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, QM IsRekeyed its not found old addr
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, static check card Crypto, check card company card, seq = 1 =...
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, static check card Crypto card = company-map, seq = 1, ACL does not proxy IDs src:66.25.14.195 dst: x.x.x.x
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, tunnel IPSec rejecting: no entry for crypto for proxy card proxy remote 66.25.14.195/255.255.255.255/17/0 local x.x.x.x/255.255.255.255/17/1701 on the outside interface
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x501c1f0, mess id 0xa5db9562).
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, case of mistaken IKE responder QM WSF (struct & 0x501c1f0) , : QM_DONE EV_ERROR--> QM_BLD_MSG2 EV_NEGO_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_IS_REKEY--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_CONFIRM_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_PROC_MSG--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_HASH_OK--> QM_BLD_MSG2, NullEvent--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_COMP_HASH
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, peer table correlator Removing failed, no match!
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: ignoring msg SA brand with Iddm 204914688 dead because ITS removal

    The outputs of two debugging who worry are the following:

    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, data received in payload ID remote Proxy Host: address 172.16.0.104 17 of the Protocol, Port 0
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, data received in payload ID local Proxy Host: address x.x.x.x, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701

    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, static check card Crypto, check card company card, seq = 1 =...
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, static check card Crypto card = company-map, seq = 1, ACL does not proxy IDs src:66.25.14.195 dst: x.x.x.x
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, tunnel IPSec rejecting: no entry for crypto for proxy card proxy remote 66.25.14.195/255.255.255.255/17/0 local x.x.x.x/255.255.255.255/17/1701 on the outside interface
    Sep 03 02:10:05 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 66.25.14.195, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x501c1f0, mess id 0xa5db9562).

    This seems to indicate that his NAT detection but then do not assign to the entry card cryptography because networks are encrypted are not in the configured ACL that is true. He needs to use dynamic input and it doesn't seem to be.

    I need to create another dynamic map entry to make it work instead of add lines to the same dynamic with a lower (higher) priority map entry?

    Thanks in advance for any help here.

    Hello

    That won't do the trick, l2tp clients are picky kindda, so you know if they do not hit the correct strategy first they just stop trying. Follow these steps:

    correspondence from the company of dynamic-map crypto-ras 1 address company-dynamic

    No crypto-card set pfs dynamic company-ras 1

    No crypto dynamic-map company-ras-1 transform-set ESP-SHA-3DES ESP-3DES-MD5 company-ras

    Dynamic crypto map company-ras 1 transform-set company-l2tp SHA-ESP-3DES ESP-3DES-MD5 company-ras

    The foregoing will not affect existing customers of IPsec at all, these clients will not use the statement of pfs and will link even if the correspondence address is not configured (it is optional), besides Cisco IPsec clients will be affected first the mode of transport policy and fail however they will continue to try and hit another police PH2.

    Regarding your last question, I was referring specifically to the support of l2tp for android, and Yes, you will need to run one of these versions.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa82/release/notes/asarn82.html#wp431562

    Tavo-

  • Cisco ASA Site to Site VPN IPSEC and NAT question

    Hi people,

    I have a question about the two Site to Site VPN IPSEC and NAT. basically what I want to achieve is to do the following:

    ASA2 is at HQ and ASA1 is a remote site. I have no problem setting a static static is a Site to IPSEC VPN between sites. Guests residing in 10.1.0.0/16 are able to communicate with hosts in 192.168.1.0/24, but what I want is to configure the NAT with IPSEC VPN for this host to 10.1.0.0/16 will communicate with hosts in 192.168.1.0/24 with translated addresses

    Just an example:

    N2 host (10.1.0.1/16) contacted N1 192.168.1.5 with destination host say 10.23.1.5 No 192.168.1.5 (notice the last byte is the same in the present case,.5)

    The translation still for the rest of the communication (host pings ip destination host 10.23.1.6 N3 N2 not 192.168.1.6 new last byte is the same)

    It sounds a bit confusing to me, but I've seen this type of configuration before when I worked for the supplier of managed services where we have given our customers (Ipsec Site to Site VPN with NAT, don't know how it was setup)

    Basically we contact the customer via site-to-site VPN hosts but their real address were hidden and we used as translated address more high 10.23.1.0/24 instead of (real) 192.168.1.0/24, last byte must be the same.

    Grateful if someone can shed some light on this subject.

    Hello

    OK so went with the old format of NAT configuration

    It seems to me that you could do the following:

    • Configure the ASA1 with static NAT strategy

      • access-list L2LVPN-POLICYNAT allowed ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
      • public static 10.23.1.0 (inside, outside) access-list L2LVPN-POLICYNAT
    • Because the above is a static NAT of the policy, this means that the translation will be made only when the destination network is 10.1.0.0/16
    • If you have for example a PAT basic configuration to inside-> external traffic, the above NAT configuration and the custom of the actual configuration of PAT interfere with eachother
    • ASA2 side, you can normally configure NAT0 / NAT Exemption for the 10.1.0.0/16 network
      • Note of the INTERIOR-SHEEP access-list SHEEP L2LVPN
      • the permitted INSIDE SHEEP 10.1.0.0 ip access list 255.255.0.0 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0
      • NAT (inside) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-SHEEP
    • You will need to consider that your access-list defining the VPN encrypted L2L traffic must reflect the new NAT network
      • ASA1: allowed to access-list L2LVPN-ENCRYPTIONDOMAIN ip 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
      • ASA2: list L2LVPN-ENCRYPTIONDOMAIN allowed ip 10.1.0.0 access 255.255.0.0 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0

    I could test this configuration to work tomorrow but I would like to know if it works.

    Please rate if this was helpful

    -Jouni

  • Windows Error VPNC3005 "unauthorized tunneling protocol" L2TP/IPSec

    I'm trying to implement a vpn L2TP/IPSec to a concentrator 3005. Everything seems to work (phase 1 completed, PHASE2 full, updated tunnel, the session began and the user is authenticated with the RADIUS) but then the tunnel fell with the message "unauthorized tunneling protocol. What causes this message?

    At one point the tunnel remained upward and running, but later I tried again and it failed. I don't remember changing anything in the config right.

    I read somewhere that I should turn on "L2TP over IPSEC" in the group but this disables the IPSEC option and it seems to me that I need IPSec for Cisco vpn clients that need to connect.

    Any suggestions?

    Change the base group to allow l2tp/ipsec; Check if l2tp is enabled at the global level.

  • Chrombook L2TP/IPSec for ASA 5510

    Hello

    I have trouble getting a chromebook to establish a remote access connection VPN using L2TP/IPsec for a Cisco ASA 5510 12 7.2 (5) running.

    Run a debug crypto isakmp 5 I see the following logs (ip changed...)

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 1.1.1.1, Oakley proposal is acceptable

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 1.1.1.1, IKE SA proposal # 1, turn # 1 entry overall IKE acceptable matches # 4

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, status of automatic NAT detection: remote endpoint IS behind a NAT device this end is NOT behind a NAT device

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, previously allocated memory of liberation for permission-dn-attributes

    06 jan 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, PHASE 1 COMPLETED

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, Keep-alive type for this connection: DPD

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, timer to generate a new key to start P1: 8100 seconds.

    06 jan 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, PHASE 1 COMPLETED

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, Keep-alive type for this connection: DPD

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, timer to generate a new key to start P1: 8100 seconds.

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, data received in payload ID remote Proxy Host: address 3.3.3.3, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, data received in payload ID local Proxy Host: address 2.2.2.2, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, detected L2TP/IPSec session.

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, QM IsRekeyed its not found old addr

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, static checking Card Crypto, check card = outside_map, seq = 1...

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, static checking Card Crypto Card = outside_map, seq = 1, ACL does not proxy IDs src:1.1.1.1 dst: 2.2.2.2

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, only Tunnel UDP-encapsulated and UDP-encapsulated-Transport mode NAT-Traversal-defined selection

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, remote peer IKE configured crypto card: outside_dyn_map0

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, ITS processing IPSec payload

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, proposals of any IPSec security association has deemed unacceptable.

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x3d48800, mess id 0xce12c3dc).

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, history of mistake IKE responder QM WSF (struct & 0x3d48800) , : QM_DONE EV_ERROR--> QM_BLD_MSG2 EV_NEGO_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_IS_REKEY--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_CONFIRM_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_PROC_MSG--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_HASH_OK--> QM_BLD_MSG2, NullEvent--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_COMP_HASH

    Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, removing counterpart table correlator failed, no match!

    1.1.1.1 = address remote chromebook NAT

    2.2.2.2 = ASA 5510 acting as distance termintaion access point

    3.3.3.3 = Chromebook private address

    I noticed that the Chromebook is appearing as the ID of the remote proxy but later, he seeks the applied to the Chromebook NAT address.  Not sure if this is the cause or how to solve this problem, if it is.

    Can someone advise please

    Thank you

    Ryan

    7.2 is old code.  You can re - test with 9.0.x or 9.1.x.

    https://support.Google.com/Chromebook/answer/1282338?hl=en

  • RVS4000 L2TP IPSec

    Trying to establish a L2TP IPSec VPN tunnels between remote Windows XP and Windows 2003 RRAS server customer.

    XP remote client and the RRAS W2003 server are behind routers RVS4000.

    Have established that the RRAS W2003 server will accept connections L2TP IPSec clients behind the router Cisco RVS4000 [LAN clients].

    Could not establish remote through the RVS4000 router L2TP IPSec connections. Have established that PPTP VPN RVS4000 router. Both routers are running the version 1.3.0.5

    Both routers 4000 RVs are configured for PPTP, IPSec, and L2TP VPN passthrough with the port UDP 1701 transferred to the RRAS server by the

    RVS router 4000. VPN PPTP connections have no problems.

    Error code is 792

    The problem seems to be with IPSec passthrough.  The port UDP 1701 is sent to the RRAS server. Unable to create port rules for IKE 500 or IP protocol 50/4500 on the RVS4000 because these policies collide with transmission UDP1701.

    No indication about why the IPSec fails with the RVS4000 for remote access clients, but IPSec has managed to connect to the RRAS server using LAN clients.

    1. never transfer the port UDP 1701. The port UDP 1701 is used for L2TP. However, L2TP is supposed to be in the tunnel within an IPSec tunnel. Exposing a L2TP server directly to the internet can be a security risk. Don't, don't.

    2. what you must have to pass, this is port UDP 500 for IKE (establishing the IPSec connection) and possibly port TCP/UDP 4500 for NAT traversal for IPSec. There should be no conflict. If there is, I guess it's because the RVS4000 has its own implementation of IPSec.

    3 LAN works because there's NAT involved and therefore there is no need of NAT traversal, port forwarding or something similar.

  • L2TP/IPSEC: IOS <>- Android

    Hello

    is there a working solution L2TP/IPSEC VPN between Cisco IOS and Android 2.1?

    I'm trying to get my mobile online, but the connection is complete after 10 sek.

    Any tips?

    Harald

    My IOS config:

    VPDN enable
    !
    VPDN-group l2tpvpn
    ! Default L2TP VPDN group
    accept-dialin
    L2tp Protocol
    virtual-model 1
    no authentication of l2tp tunnel
    !

    username privilege 15 secret password user

    door-key crypto l2tpvpn
    pre-shared key address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 test key
    !
    crypto ISAKMP policy 1
    BA 3des
    preshared authentication
    Group 2
    life 3600

    test key crypto isakmp 0.0.0.0 address 0.0.0.0

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac L2TP-TS
    !
    Dynvpn crypto dynamic-map 1
    Set nat demux
    game of transformation-L2TP-TS

    map CRYPTOMAP 20-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynvpn

    interface virtual-Template1
    IP unnumbered Ethernet0
    the peer default VPN ip address pool
    KeepAlive 5
    PPP authentication ms-chap-v2

    interface BVI1
    IP address 212.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.0
    NAT outside IP
    IP virtual-reassembly
    by default auto-configured IPv6 address
    enable IPv6
    card crypto CRYPTOMAP
    !
    local pool IP VPN 172.17.0.1 172.17.0.10

    Some debugs:

    IOS #.
    Jul 2 16:00:01.800 it IS: ISAKMP:(0:13:HW:2): IPSec policy invalidated proposal
    Jul 2 16:00:01.800 it IS: ISAKMP:(0:13:HW:2): IPSec policy invalidated proposal
    Jul 2 16:00:01.800 it IS: ISAKMP:(0:13:HW:2): IPSec policy invalidated proposal
    Jul 2 16:00:01.804 it IS: ISAKMP:(0:13:HW:2): IPSec policy invalidated proposal
    Jul 2 16:00:01.804 it IS: ISAKMP:(0:13:HW:2): IPSec policy invalidated proposal
    Jul 2 16:00:01.808 it IS: ISAKMP:(0:13:HW:2): IPSec policy invalidated proposal
    Jul 2 16:00:01.808 it IS: ISAKMP:(0:13:HW:2): politics of ITS phase 2 is not acceptable! (local 212.xxx.xxx.xxx remote 80.xxx.xxx.xxx)
    Jul 2 16:00:01.816 it IS: ISAKMP: (0:13:HW:2): node-1463956874 error suppression REAL reason "QM rejected."
    Jul 2 16:00:01.816 it IS: ISAKMP (0:268435469): unknown entry IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_QM_EXCH: node-1463956874: State = IKE_QM_R EADY
    Jul 2 16:00:01.820 it IS: % CRYPTO-6-IKMP_MODE_FAILURE: fast processing mode failed with the peer to 80.xxx.xxx.xxx

    IOS #.
    Jul 2 16:00:32.695 it IS: L2X: Parse AVP flag 0, len 8, 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.695 2 Jul CEST: L2X: Parse SCCRQ
    Jul 2 16:00:32.695 it IS: L2X: Parse AVP 2 flag, len 8, 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.699 2 Jul CEST: L2X: Protocol Version 1
    Jul 2 16:00:32.699 it IS: L2X: Parse AVP 7, len 15, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    Jul 2 16:00:32.699 it IS: L2X: anonymous host name
    Jul 2 16:00:32.699 it IS: L2X: Parse AVP 3, len 10, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.699 2 Jul CEST: L2X: framing course 0 x 3
    Jul 2 16:00:32.703 it IS: L2X: Parse AVP 9 flag, len 8, 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.703 2 Jul CEST: L2X: Tunnel ID 3545 assigned
    Jul 2 16:00:32.703 it IS: L2X: Parse AVP 10 flag, len 8, 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.703 2 Jul CEST: L2X: Rx 1 window size
    Jul 2 16:00:32.703 it IS: L2X: no missing AVPs in SCCRQ
    Jul 2 16:00:32.703 it IS: L2X: I SCCRQ, flg TLS, worm 2, len 69, NL 0 ns 0, nr 0
    contiguous Pak, size 69
    C8 02 00 45 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 08 00 00
    00 00 00 01 80 08 00 00 00 02 01 00 80 00 00 0F
    00-07-61 6TH 6TH 6F 6F 79 6 75 73 80 0 A 00 00 00
    03 00 00 00 03 80 08 00 00 00 09 0D 80 08 00 D9
    00 00 0 A 00 01
    Jul 2 16:00:32.707 it IS: L2TP: I LNP SCCRQ anonymous 3545
    Jul 2 16:00:32.711 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: authorization of Tunnel began to host anonymous
    Jul 2 16:00:32.711 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: new tunnel created for remote anonymous, address 80.xxx.xxx.xxx
    Jul 2 16:00:32.715 it IS: L2X: response to author Tunnel L2X info not found
    Jul 2 16:00:32.715 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: O SCCRP anonymous 3545 tnlid
    Jul 2 16:00:32.715 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: AVP Parse 0, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.715 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse SCCRP
    Jul 2 16:00:32.719 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse AVP 2, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.719 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: Protocol Version 1
    Jul 2 16:00:32.719 it IS: L2TP 55994 LNP: Parse AVP 6 flag, len 8, 0 x 0
    16:00:32.719 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: Firmware Ver 0 x 1120
    Jul 2 16:00:32.719 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse AVP 7, len 9, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.719 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: Hostname IOS
    Jul 2 16:00:32.723 it IS: L2TP 55994 LNP: flag of Parse AVP 8, len 25, 0 x 0
    16:00:32.723 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: name provider Cisco Systems, Inc.
    Jul 2 16:00:32.727 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse AVP 10, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.727 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: Rx 300 window size
    Jul 2 16:00:32.727 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse AVP 9, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.727 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: assigned Tunnel ID 55994
    Jul 2 16:00:32.727 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse AVP 3, len 10, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.727 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: framing course 0 x 0
    Jul 2 16:00:32.731 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse AVP 4, len 10, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.731 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: bearer Cap 0 x 0
    Jul 2 16:00:32.731 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: O SCCRP, flg TLS, worm 2, len 106, LNP 3545, ns 0 nr 1
    C8 02 00 6A 00 00 00 00 00 01 80 08 00 00 D9 0D
    00 00 00 02 80 08 00 00 00 02 01 00 00 08 00 00
    00 06 11 20 80 09 00 00 00 07 49 53 00 19 00 4F
    00 00 08 43 69 73 63 6F 20 53 79 73 74 65 6 D 73
    2 20 49 6 2 63 80...
    Jul 2 16:00:32.735 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: setting channel delay retransmission positioned in 1 seconds
    Jul 2 16:00:32.735 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Tunnel of status change from idle to wait-ctl-reply
    Jul 2 16:00:32.887 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: AVP Parse 0, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:32.887 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse SCCCN
    Jul 2 16:00:32.887 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: no missing AVPs in SCCCN
    Jul 2 16:00:32.887 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: I SCCCN, flg TLS, worm 2, len 20, LNP 55994 ns 1, n ° 1
    contiguous Pak, size 20
    C8 02 00 14 DA 00 00 00 01 00 01 80 08 00 00 BA
    00 00 00 03
    Jul 2 16:00:32.891 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: O ZPL ctrl ack, flg TLS, worm 2, len 12, LNP 3545, ns 1, n ° 2
    C8 02 00 00 00 00 01 00 02 D9 0D 0C
    Jul 2 16:00:32.891 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: I LNP SCCCN anonymous 3545
    Jul 2 16:00:32.895 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Tunnel of change of State of wait-ctl-reply to set up
    Jul 2 16:00:32.895 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: SM established State
    Jul 2 16:00:33.091 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: AVP Parse 0, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:33.091 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse ICRQ
    Jul 2 16:00:33.091 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse AVP 14, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:33.091 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: assigned Call ID 43765
    Jul 2 16:00:33.091 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse AVP 15, len 10, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:33.091 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: serial number 1986235932
    Jul 2 16:00:33.091 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: no missing AVPs in ICRQ
    Jul 2 16:00:33.095 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: I ICRQ, flg TLS, worm 2, len 38, LNP 55994 ns 2, n ° 1
    contiguous Pak, size 38
    C8 02 00 26 DA 00 00 00 02 00 01 80 08 00 00 BA
    00 00 00 0 A 80 08 00 00 00 0E AA 80 0 A 00 00 F5
    0F 00 76 63 8F 1 C
    Jul 2 16:00:33.095 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: I LNP ICRQ anonymous 3545
    Jul 2 16:00:33.099 it IS: nl/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: change of State of Session idle for wait-connect
    Jul 2 16:00:33.099 it IS: L2TP 55994/18 LNP/Sn: accepted ICRQ, new session created
    Jul 2 16:00:33.099 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: O ICRP to anonymous 3545/43765
    Jul 2 16:00:33.099 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: AVP Parse 0, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    Jul 2 16:00:33.103 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: Parse IPRC
    Jul 2 16:00:33.103 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: Parse AVP 14, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    Jul 2 16:00:33.103 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: call ID assigned 18
    Jul 2 16:00:33.103 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: O IPRC, flg TLS, len 28, LNP 3545, lsid 18, rsid 43765, worm 2, ns 1, no. 3
    C8 02 00 1 C F5 00 01 00 03 80 08 00 00 AA D9 0D
    00 00 00 0 B 80 08 00 00 00 0E 00 12
    Jul 2 16:00:33.107 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: setting channel delay retransmission positioned in 1 seconds
    Jul 2 16:00:33.259 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: AVP Parse 0, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    Jul 2 16:00:33.259 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: Parse ICCN
    Jul 2 16:00:33.259 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: Parse AVP 24, len 10, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    Jul 2 16:00:33.259 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: connect speed 100000000
    Jul 2 16:00:33.259 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: Parse AVP 19, len 10, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    Jul 2 16:00:33.259 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: framing Type 3
    Jul 2 16:00:33.263 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: no missing AVPs to ICCN
    Jul 2 16:00:33.263 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: I ICCN, flg TLS, worm 2, len 40, LNP 55994, 18, rsid 43765 lsid, ns 3, n ° 2
    contiguous Pak, size 40
    C8 02 00 28 DA 00 12 00 03 00 02 80 08 00 00 BA
    00 00 00 0 C 80 0 A 00 00 00 18 05 F5 E1 00 0 A 80
    00 00 00 13 00 00 00 03
    Jul 2 16:00:33.263 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: O ZPL ctrl ack, flg TLS, worm 2, len 12, LNP 3545, 18, rsid 43765 lsid, ns 2, nr 4
    C8 02 00 00 00 00 02 00 04 D9 0D 0C
    Jul 2 16:00:33.267 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: I have anonymous LNP 3545 ICCN, cl 43765
    Jul 2 16:00:33.267 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: change of State of waiting Session - connect to wait-for-service-selection-iccn
    Jul 2 16:00:33.275 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: O SLI to anonymous 3545/43765
    Jul 2 16:00:33.275 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: sending send 0xFFFFFFFF ACCM and receive ACCM 0xFFFFFFFF
    Jul 2 16:00:33.275 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: AVP Parse 0, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:33.275 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse SLI
    Jul 2 16:00:33.275 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse AVP 35, len 16, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    Jul 2 16:00:33.279 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: O SLI, flg TLS, worm 2, len 36, LNP 3545, ns 2 nr 4
    C8 02 00 24 AA D9 00 02 00 04 80 08 00 00 0D F5
    00 00 00 10 80 10 00 00 00 23 00 00 FF FF FF FF
    FF FF FF FF
    Jul 2 16:00:33.279 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: setting channel delay retransmission positioned in 1 seconds
    Jul 2 16:00:33.283 THATS: ppp25 PPP: send a Message [dynamic Bind response]
    Jul 2 16:00:33.283 THATS: ppp25 PPP: via vpn, set the direction of the call
    Jul 2 16:00:33.283 THATS: ppp25 PPP: treatment of connection as a callin
    Jul 2 16:00:33.283 THATS: ppp25 PPP: id of Session Session handle [A300003D] [25]
    Jul 2 16:00:33.283 THATS: ppp25 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Passive open
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.283: ppp25 TPIF: State is listening
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.475: ppp25 TPIF: I CONFREQ [listen] id 1 len 24
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.475: ppp25 TPIF: MRU 1400 (0 x 01040578)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.479: ppp25 TPIF: ACCM 0x00000000 (0 x 020600000000)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.479: ppp25 TPIF: MagicNumber 0x81EDA0D1 (0x050681EDA0D1)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.479: ppp25 TPIF: PFC (0 x 0702)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.479: ppp25 TPIF: RAC (0 x 0802)
    Jul 2 16:00:33.479 THATS: ppp25 PPP: required authorization
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.479: ppp25 TPIF: O CONFREQ [listen] id 1 len 25
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.483: ppp25 TPIF: ACCM 0x000A0000 (0x0206000A0000)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.483: ppp25 TPIF: AuthProto MS-CHAP-V2 (0x0305C22381)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.483: ppp25 TPIF: MagicNumber 0x1D3AB2DD (0x05061D3AB2DD)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.483: ppp25 TPIF: PFC (0 x 0702)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.483: ppp25 TPIF: RAC (0 x 0802)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.483: ppp25 TPIF: O CONFNAK [listen] id 1 len 8
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.487: ppp25 TPIF: MRU 1500 (0x010405DC)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.635: ppp25 TPIF: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 1 len 25
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.635: ppp25 TPIF: ACCM 0x000A0000 (0x0206000A0000)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.639: ppp25 TPIF: AuthProto MS-CHAP-V2 (0x0305C22381)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.639: ppp25 TPIF: MagicNumber 0x1D3AB2DD (0x05061D3AB2DD)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.639: ppp25 TPIF: PFC (0 x 0702)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.639: ppp25 TPIF: RAC (0 x 0802)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.647: ppp25 TPIF: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 20
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.647: ppp25 TPIF: ACCM 0x00000000 (0 x 020600000000)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.647: ppp25 TPIF: MagicNumber 0x81EDA0D1 (0x050681EDA0D1)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.647: ppp25 TPIF: PFC (0 x 0702)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.647: ppp25 TPIF: RAC (0 x 0802)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.651: ppp25 TPIF: O CONFACK [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 20
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.651: ppp25 TPIF: ACCM 0x00000000 (0 x 020600000000)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.651: ppp25 TPIF: MagicNumber 0x81EDA0D1 (0x050681EDA0D1)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.651: ppp25 TPIF: PFC (0 x 0702)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.651: ppp25 TPIF: RAC (0 x 0802)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:33.651: ppp25 TPIF: State is open
    Jul 2 16:00:33.655 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: O SLI to anonymous 3545/43765
    Jul 2 16:00:33.655 THATS: uid:25 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: sending sending ACCM 0x00000000 and receive ACCM 0x000A0000
    Jul 2 16:00:33.655 THATS: ppp25 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING,
    Jul 2 16:00:33.659 THATS: ppp25 MS-CHAP-V2: O CHALLENGE id 1 len 24 'IOS '.
    Jul 2 16:00:33.847 THATS: ppp25 MS-CHAP-V2: I ANSWER id 1 len 59 of 'user '.
    Jul 2 16:00:33.847 THATS: ppp25 PPP: Phase TRANSFER, tempting with impatience
    Jul 2 16:00:33.851 THATS: ppp25 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, unauthenticated user
    Jul 2 16:00:33.851 THATS: ppp25 PPP: request sent MSCHAP_V2 LOGIN
    Jul 2 16:00:33.891 THATS: ppp25 PPP: received LOGIN response PASS
    Jul 2 16:00:33.891 THATS: ppp25 PPP: Phase TRANSFER, tempting with impatience
    Jul 2 16:00:33.891 THATS: ppp25 PPP: send a Message [Local connection]
    Jul 2 16:00:33.899 THATS: Vi3.1 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: virtual interface created for the unknown, bandwidth 100000 Kbps
    Jul 2 16:00:33.899 THATS: ppp25 PPP: link [Virtual - Access3.1]
    2 Jul EST 16:00:33.903: Vi3.1 PPP: Send Message [static response Bind]
    Jul 2 16:00:33.903 THATS: Vi3.1 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: change of State of Session waiting-for-service-selection-iccn Workbench
    Jul 2 16:00:33.903 THATS: Vi3.1 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: VPDN session upwards
    Jul 2 16:00:33.907 THATS: Vi3.1 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, authenticated user
    2 Jul EST 16:00:33.911: Vi3.1 PPP: LCP AUTHOR asked
    2 Jul EST 16:00:33.911: Vi3.1 PPP: sent CPIW AUTHOR request
    2 Jul EST 16:00:33.911: Vi3.1 TPIF: received AAA AUTHOR response PASS
    2 Jul EST 16:00:33.915: Vi3.1 IPCP: received AAA AUTHOR response PASS
    Jul 2 16:00:33.915 THATS: Vi3.1 MS-CHAP-V2: SUCCESS O id 1 len 46 msg is "S = D216E8EA91BF8126B5CF3D0CAA7AFF2B580216AA".
    Jul 2 16:00:33.919 THATS: Vi3.1 PPP: Phase is in PLACE
    Jul 2 16:00:33.919 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 1 len 10
    2 Jul EST 16:00:33.919: Vi3.1 CPIW: address 192.168.0.254 (0x0306AC1000FE)
    Jul 2 16:00:33.919 THATS: Vi3.1 PPP: process pending ncp packets
    Jul 2 16:00:34.067 THATS: Vi3.1 CCP: I CONFREQ [not negotiated] id 1 len 15
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.067: Vi3.1 CCP: deflate 0 x 7800 (0x1A047800)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.067: Vi3.1 CCP: MVRMA 0 x 7800 (0 x 18047800)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.067: Vi3.1 CCP: BSDLZW 47 (0x15032F)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:34.071: Vi3.1 TPIF: Protocol of 21 O PROTREJ [open] id len 2 CCP
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.071: Vi3.1 TPIF: (0x80FD0101000F1A047800180478001503)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.071: Vi3.1 TPIF: (0x2F)
    Jul 2 16:00:34.071 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 1 len 28
    Jul 2 16:00:34.071 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: CompressType VJ 15 slots CompressSlotID (0x0206002D0F01)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.075: Vi3.1 CPIW: address 0.0.0.0 (0 x 030600000000)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.075: Vi3.1 IPCP: PrimaryDNS 0.0.0.0 (0 x 810600000000)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.075: Vi3.1 CPIW: SecondaryDNS 0.0.0.0 (0 x 830600000000)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.075: Vi3.1 AAA/AUTHOR/CPIW: start.  We want his address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.075: Vi3.1 AAA/AUTHOR/CPIW: fact.  We want his address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
    Jul 2 16:00:34.079 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: pool returned 172.17.0.1
    Jul 2 16:00:34.079 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: O CONFREJ [REQsent] id 1 len 10
    Jul 2 16:00:34.079 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: CompressType VJ 15 slots CompressSlotID (0x0206002D0F01)
    Jul 2 16:00:34.079 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 1 len 10
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.079: Vi3.1 CPIW: address 172.16.0.254 (0x0306AC1000FE)
    Jul 2 16:00:34.283 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 22
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.283: Vi3.1 CPIW: address 0.0.0.0 (0 x 030600000000)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.287: Vi3.1 IPCP: PrimaryDNS 0.0.0.0 (0 x 810600000000)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.287: Vi3.1 CPIW: SecondaryDNS 0.0.0.0 (0 x 830600000000)
    Jul 2 16:00:34.287 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: O CONFNAK [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 22
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.287: Vi3.1 CPIW: address of 172.17.0.1 (0x0306AC110001)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.287: Vi3.1 IPCP: PrimaryDNS 1.1.1.1 (0x8106D918C242)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.287: Vi3.1 CPIW: SecondaryDNS 2.2.2.2 (0x83065262438E)
    Jul 2 16:00:34.291 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: 3 added to resendQ, updated nr 4 and sent through peer review
    Jul 2 16:00:34.295 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: O SLI, flg TLS, worm 2, len 36, LNP 3545, ns 3 nr 4
    C8 02 00 24 0D AA 00 03 00 04 80 08 00 00 F5 D9
    00 00 00 10 80 10 00 00 00 23 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0 A 00 00 00
    Jul 2 16:00:34.447 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 3 len 22
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.447: Vi3.1 CPIW: address of 172.17.0.1 (0x0306AC110001)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.447: Vi3.1 IPCP: PrimaryDNS 1.1.1.1 (0x8106D918C242)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.451: Vi3.1 CPIW: SecondaryDNS 2.2.2.2 (0x83065262438E)
    Jul 2 16:00:34.451 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: O CONFACK [ACKrcvd] id 3 len 22
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.451: Vi3.1 CPIW: address of 172.17.0.1 (0x0306AC110001)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.451: Vi3.1 IPCP: PrimaryDNS 1.1.1.1 (0x8106D918C242)
    2 Jul EST 16:00:34.451: Vi3.1 CPIW: SecondaryDNS 2.2.2.2 (0x83065262438E)
    Jul 2 16:00:34.451 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: State is open
    Jul 2 16:00:34.459 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: install road to 172.17.0.1
    Jul 2 16:00:35.303 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: setting channel delay retransmission positioned in 1 seconds

    IOS #ping 172.17.0.1

    Type to abort escape sequence.
    Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 172.17.0.1, wait time is 2 seconds:
    !!!!!
    Success rate is 100 per cent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 156/160/172 ms
    IOS #.

    Jul 2 EST 16:00:45.547: Vi3.1 TPIF: I TERMREQ [open] id 3 len 16 (0 x 557365722072657175657374)
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:45.547: Vi3.1 TPIF: O TERMACK [open] id 3 len 4
    Jul 2 16:00:45.547 THATS: Vi3.1 PPP: sending Acct event [low] id [F0D]
    Jul 2 16:00:45.547 THATS: Vi3.1 PPP: Phase ENDS
    Jul 2 16:00:45.955 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: AVP Parse 0, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:45.955 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse StopCCN
    Jul 2 16:00:45.955 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse AVP 9, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    16:00:45.959 2 Jul CEST: LNP 55994 L2TP: Tunnel ID 3545 assigned
    Jul 2 16:00:45.959 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Parse AVP 1, len 8, flag 0 x 8000 (M)
    Jul 2 16:00:45.959 it IS: L2X: lead (6): 6: applicant is either stopped
    Jul 2 16:00:45.959 it IS: code (0) error: no error
    Jul 2 16:00:45.959 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: no missing AVPs in StopCCN
    Jul 2 16:00:45.959 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: I StopCCN, flg TLS, worm 2, len 36, LNP 55994 ns 4, no. 4
    contiguous Pak, size 36
    C8 02 00 24 DA 00 00 00 04 00 04 80 08 00 00 BA
    00 00 00 04 80 08 00 00 00 09 0D 80 08 00 00 D9
    00 01 00 06
    Jul 2 16:00:45.963 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: O ZPL ctrl ack, flg TLS, worm 2, len 12, LNP 3545, ns 4, no. 5
    C8 02 00 00 00 00 04 00 05 D9 0D 0C
    Jul 2 16:00:45.967 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: I LNP StopCCN anonymous 3545
    Jul 2 16:00:45.967 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: changing the status of the Tunnel created for withdrawal
    Jul 2 16:00:45.967 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: tunnel of Shutdown
    Jul 2 16:00:45.967 THATS: Vi3.1 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: disconnect (L2X) IETF: 9/Ascend nas-error: 65/VPDN Tunnel down / installation fails
    Jul 2 16:00:45.967 THATS: Vi3.1 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: destruction of session
    Jul 2 16:00:45.967 THATS: Vi3.1 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: change of State of Session bench in slow motion
    Jul 2 16:00:45.971 THATS: Vi3.1 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: judgment of accounting sent
    Jul 2 16:00:45.971 THATS: Vi3.1 LNP/Sn 55994/18 L2TP: session without commitment of the IDB
    Jul 2 16:00:45.971 THATS: Vi3.1 VPDN: interface reset
    Jul 2 16:00:45.975 THATS: Vi3.1 PPP: block vaccess to be released [0 x 19]
    Jul 2 16:00:45.975 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: Tunnel State closing down all by destroying the session
    Jul 2 16:00:45.975 it IS: LNP 55994 L2TP: changing the State of closing down to the idle-Tunnel
    Jul 2 16:00:46.179 THATS: Vi3.1 PPP: link broken down notification
    Jul 2 EST 16:00:46.179: Vi3.1 TPIF: State is closed
    Jul 2 16:00:46.179 THATS: Vi3.1 PPP: Phase is BROKEN
    Jul 2 16:00:46.179 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: State is closed
    2 Jul EST 16:00:46.183: Vi3.1 PPP: unlocked by 0 x [1] always locked by 0 x [18]
    2 Jul EST 16:00:46.183: Vi3.1 PPP: unlocked by [0x10] always locked by [0 x 8]
    2 Jul EST 16:00:46.183: Vi3.1 PPP: Send Message [logout]
    2 Jul EST 16:00:46.183: Vi3.1 PPP: unlocked by [0x8] always locked by 0 x [0]
    Jul 2 16:00:46.183 THATS: Vi3.1 PPP: free previously blocked vaccess
    Jul 2 16:00:46.187 THATS: Vi3.1 CPIW: Remove the road to 172.17.0.1

    Harold,

    I need of debugs more to be sure, but it seems that the quick mode ipsec fails (phase 2).  Try changing your transformation set to use "transport mode", because I believe that required for l2tp/ipsec.

    If it does not, it should be him debugs full for "debug crypto isakmp" and "debug crypto ipsec".

    -Jason

  • Support for L2TP/IpSec VPN on 1921

    Hello

    I am not able to find an answer on something very simple... Fact of 1921 Cisco router supports L2TP/IpSec VPN connections? (from Windows 7 clients)

    If she could please point me to the right location/document where I can read more about it.

    I already tried with the configuration below, but command ppp under a virtual-Template1 don't output interface.

    Thank you very much for your answers.

    Kind regards

    Herman

    # VPN configuration I've tried, but it did not work.

    crypto ISAKMP policy 1

    BA 3des

    preshared authentication

    Group 2

    life 4000

    ISAKMP crypto key xxxxxxx address X.X.X.X (ip strongvpn)

    !

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES256-SHA1 esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac

    transport mode

    !

    Map 10 IPSEC L2TP ipsec-isakmp crypto

    defined peer X.X.X.X

    game of transformation-ESP-AES256-SHA1

    match address 101

    !

    !

    !

    Pseudowire-class pwclass1

    encapsulation l2tpv2

    local IP interface FastEthernet0/0

    PMTU IP

    !

    !

    !

    !

    interface FastEthernet0/0

    DHCP IP address

    automatic duplex

    automatic speed

    card crypto IPSEC L2TP

    !

    interface FastEthernet0/1

    IP 10.20.20.1 255.255.255.0

    IP nat inside

    IP virtual-reassembly

    automatic duplex

    automatic speed

    !

    interface Serial0/0/0

    no ip address

    Shutdown

    !

    interface Serial0/1/0

    no ip address

    Shutdown

    2000000 clock frequency

    !

    virtual-PPP1 interface

    the negotiated IP address

    IP mtu 1399

    NAT outside IP

    IP virtual-reassembly max-pumping 64

    No cdp enable

    PPP authentication ms-chap-v2 callin

    PPP chap hostname vpnxxx

    PPP chap password 0 xxxxxxxxxx

    Pseudowire pw-class 1, pwclass1 X.X.X.X

    ##################################################################################################################

    Cisco-gw #show version

    Cisco IOS software, software C1900 (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2 (4) M2, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc2)

    Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport

    Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc.

    Updated Thursday, November 7, 12 and 12:45 by prod_rel_team

    ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0 M16 (1r), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

    Cisco-gw uptime is 2 days, 4 hours, 22 minutes

    System to regain the power ROM

    System restart to 09:11:07 PCTime Tuesday, April 2, 2013

    System image file is "usbflash0:c1900 - universalk9-mz.» Spa. 152 - 4.M2.bin.

    Last reload type: normal charging

    Reload last reason: power

    This product contains cryptographic features and is under the United States

    States and local laws governing the import, export, transfer and

    use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply

    third party approval to import, export, distribute or use encryption.

    Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for

    compliance with U.S. laws and local countries. By using this product you

    agree to comply with the regulations and laws in force. If you are unable

    to satisfy the United States and local laws, return the product.

    A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products to:

    http://www.Cisco.com/WWL/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html

    If you need assistance please contact us by mail at

    [email protected] / * /.

    Cisco CISCO1921/K9 (revision 1.0) with 491520K / 32768K bytes of memory.

    Card processor ID FCZ170793UH

    2 gigabit Ethernet interfaces

    1 line of terminal

    1 module of virtual private network (VPN)

    Configuration of DRAM is 64 bits wide with disabled parity.

    255K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.

    249840K bytes of Flash usbflash0 (read/write)

    License info:

    License IDU:

    -------------------------------------------------

    Device SN # PID

    -------------------------------------------------

    * 0 CISCO1921/K9

    Technology for the Module package license information: "c1900".

    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    Technology-technology-package technology

    Course Type next reboot

    ------------------------------------------------------------------

    IPBase ipbasek9 ipbasek9 Permanent

    Security securityk9 Permanent securityk9

    given none none none

    Configuration register is 0 x 2102

    Yes, it is supported.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk827/tk369/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094501.shtml#iosforl2tp

    It is necessary to configure the encapsulation under virtual-model.

    Note: you will have much better results by using the IPSec VPN or SSL VPN client AnyConnect client.

  • L2TP/IPSec connection failed for Windows 7 Ultimate for Windows Server R2 2012 with error 789.

    For this preface, I use the server in a lab environment and trying to set up my own VPN L2TP/IPSec. I opened the UDP 500 and 1701 TCP ports on my router for the interface of the primary server where is the VPN. It is on a Comcast connection consumer where other applications such as Arma 3 servers dedicated and IIS have worked.
    The RRAS role to run based on this tutorial: http://www.thomasmaurer.ch/2014/01/how-to-install-vpn-on-windows-server-2012-r2/ I have only strayed from it using DHCP forwarding instead of a static pool of IP as my router is running a DHCP server, and if I understand correctly, the router must give IP addresses of the internal IP pool which I use for everything else. I also use the PSK authentication rather than be based certificate. For the authentication of users I have MS-CHAP-V2 and CHAP enabled; I connect from the remote device with an account on that I created on the server for the purpose of this VPN I know RRAS connections are allowed.

    When the connection I get error 789: L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer detected a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer. From what I've seen, this can be fixed by checking that the two ends of the connection are not behind a NAT (not an option), verification of the PSK (already done) and certificates (not applicable). If there is a way to solve this problem that would be great, but my server will always be behind a NAT firewall because the router is one, and the modem becomes one if several devices are connected to him without a router between the two.


    This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN

    http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  • Problem on the establishment of a GRE/IPsec tunnel between 2 cisco routers

    Hello world

    I am trying to establish a GRE IPsec tunnel between two cisco routers (2620XM and a 836).

    I created a tunnel interfaces on both routers as follows.

    2620XM

    interface Tunnel0

    IP 10.1.5.2 255.255.255.252

    tunnel source x.x.x.x

    tunnel destination y.y.y.y

    end

    836

    interface Tunnel0

    IP 10.1.5.1 255.255.255.252

    tunnel source y.y.y.y

    tunnel destination x.x.x.x

    end

    and configuration of isakmp/ipsec as follows,

    2620XM

    crypto ISAKMP policy 10

    md5 hash

    preshared authentication

    ISAKMP crypto key {keys} address y.y.y.y no.-xauth

    !

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac to_melissia

    !

    myvpn 9 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    defined peer y.y.y.y

    Set transform-set to_melissia

    match address 101

    2620XM-router #sh ip access list 101

    Expand the access IP 101 list

    10 permit host x.x.x.x y.y.y.y host will

    836

    crypto ISAKMP policy 10

    md5 hash

    preshared authentication

    ISAKMP crypto key {keys} address x.x.x.x No.-xauth

    !

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac to_metamorfosi

    !

    myvpn 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    defined peer x.x.x.x

    Set transform-set to_metamorfosi

    match address 101

    836-router #sh access list 101

    Expand the access IP 101 list

    10 licences will host host x.x.x.x y.y.y.y

    Unfortunately I had no isakmp security associations at all and when I enter the debugging to this output.

    CRYPTO: IPSEC (crypto_map_check_encrypt_core): CRYPTO: removed package as currently being created cryptomap.

    Any ideas why I get this result? Any help will be a great help

    Thank you!!!

    I think it's possible. It seems to me that you are assuming that the address of the interface where goes the card encryption is peering address. While this is the default action, it is possible to configure it differently.

    As you have discovered the card encryption must be on the physical output interface. If you want the peering address to have a different value of the physical interface address outgoing, then you can add this command to your crypto card:

    card crypto-address

    so if you put loopback0 as the id_interface then he would use loopback0 as peering address even if the card encryption may be affected on serial0/0 or another physical interface.

    HTH

    Rick

  • IPSEC not Pkts on Cisco ASA

    Hi, please I need a help.

    I have an IPSEC tunnel with my Cisco ASA and a PFsense Peer, VPN is to include phase 2.

    But I could not send pkts on this VPN.

    My internal network - 10.2.0.0/17, 172.31.2.2/32 customer network

    ==========================

    FW - counterpart of the ipsec VPN - 01 # sho 177.154.83.34
    address of the peers: 177.154.83.34
    Tag crypto map: outside_map0, seq num: 4, local addr: 200.243.146.20

    access extensive list ip 10.2.0.0 outside_cryptomap_8 allow 255.255.128.0 host 172.31.2.2
    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.2.0.0/255.255.128.0/0/0)
    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.31.2.2/255.255.255.255/0/0)
    current_peer: 177.154.83.34

    #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
          #pkts decaps: 2957, #pkts decrypt: 2957, #pkts check: 2957
    compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
    #pkts uncompressed: 0, comp #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
    success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0
    Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0
    #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 1

    local crypto endpt. : 200.243.146.20/0, remote Start crypto. : 177.154.83.34/0
    Path mtu 1500, fresh ipsec generals 74, media, mtu 1500
    current outbound SPI: C1A13463
    current inbound SPI: 5B6B0EAB

    SAS of the esp on arrival:
    SPI: 0x5B6B0EAB (1533742763)
    transform: aes-256-esp esp-sha-hmac no compression
    running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel, PFS 2 group}
    slot: 0, id_conn: 9179136, crypto-card: outside_map0
    calendar of his: service life remaining key (s): 858
    Size IV: 16 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Anti-replay bitmap:
    0xFFFFFFFF to 0xFFFFFFFF
    outgoing esp sas:
    SPI: 0xC1A13463 (3248567395)
    transform: aes-256-esp esp-sha-hmac no compression
    running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel, PFS 2 group}
    slot: 0, id_conn: 9179136, crypto-card: outside_map0
    calendar of his: service life remaining key (s): 858
    Size IV: 16 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Anti-replay bitmap:
    0x00000000 0x00000001

    ===========================

    Entry packet - trace FW-VPN-01 # outside icmp 10.2.110.10 1 172.31.2.2 0

    Phase: 1
    Type:-ROUTE SEARCH
    Subtype: entry
    Result: ALLOW
    Config:
    Additional information:
    in 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outdoors

    Phase: 2
    Type: ACCESS-LIST
    Subtype:
    Result: DECLINE
    Config:
    Implicit rule
    Additional information:

    Result:
    input interface: outdoors
    entry status: to the top
    entry-line-status: to the top
    output interface: outside
    the status of the output: to the top
    output-line-status: to the top
    Action: drop
    Drop-reason: flow (acl-drop) is denied by the configured rule

    ===============================

    FW-VPN-01 # sho running-config | 177.154.83.34 Inc.
    outside_map0 card crypto 4 peers set 177.154.83.34
    internal GroupPolicy_177.154.83.34 group strategy
    attributes of Group Policy GroupPolicy_177.154.83.34
    tunnel-group 177.154.83.34 type ipsec-l2l
    tunnel-group 177.154.83.34 general-attributes
    Group - default policy - GroupPolicy_177.154.83.34
    IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 177.154.83.34

    ==============================

    FW-VPN-01 # sho running-config | 172.31.2.2 Inc.
    network 172.31.2.2_32 object
    Home 172.31.2.2
    access-list sheep extended 10.2.0.0 ip allow 255.255.128.0 host 172.31.2.2
    access extensive list ip 10.2.0.0 inside_access_in allow 255.255.128.0 object 172.31.2.2_32
    permit access list extended ip object 10.2.0.0_17 object 172.31.2.2_32 outside_cryptomap_5
    permit access list extended ip object 10.2.0.0_17 object 172.31.2.2_32 outside_cryptomap_8
    NAT (inside, all) source 10.2.0.0_17 destination 10.2.0.0_17 static static 172.31.2.2_32 172.31.2.2_32 non-proxy-arp-search to itinerary

    so you see the packets traverse your inside interface but no response back. Please check if you have a route to 172.31.2.2 host in your internal network pointing traffic to the ASA.

    the package shows plotter drop because you run of out-of-in and in this case, you must specifically that traffic on the acl allow external interface. When the real traffic arrives through vpn, it checks for sysopt and then the interface access list is bypassed. but when you do a package tracer, simulated package does not in reality of vpn and therefore we have that allow outside interface acl for package tarcer to enable.

  • IPSEC and SSH2

    Does anyone know if the switch Cisco 3750 G supports IPSEC and SSH2?

    Mohsen

    Yep, that's what I would do as well.

    I'm happy to have helped.

    Jon

  • Problem setting up vpn l2tp/ipsec

    I tried to configure an ASA5505 with a l2tp/ipsec vpn which I can connect to with Windows Vista vpn client. I had connection problems. When I try to connect, watch windows vpn client tell an error message "error 789: the L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer detected a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer." The newspaper on the SAA is errors saying "Phase 1 failure: incompatibility of the types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: unknown Cfg was: Group 2.

    It seems that the ASA does not like windows vpn client IKE proposal but I do not know if I interpret correctly this error message.

    I was wondering if anyone has seen this problem or have had success with this type of installation. I have the setup of device OK so that I can connect with the Cisco VPN client, but get l2tp/ipsec Setup to work with the windows vpn client turns out to be problematic.

    Can you post the Config of your ASA. Did you check the following link:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807213a7.shtml

Maybe you are looking for