Left join

Hello world

Im trying to create the query that displays the values that are not available in the other table.

Scenario:

I have two tables, the material and materialfolder. I want to display documents that are not available in materialfolder.

Here's my query

SELECT m.material_id
    ,  m.MATERIAL_TYPE_ID
    ,  m.name
    ,  m.created
        FROM material m
        LEFT  JOIN materialfolder mf ON m.material_id = mf.material_id
        where to_char(m.CREATED, 'yyyy') >= ('2011')
        and to_char(m.CREATED, 'yyyy') <= ('2013');

The result does not show the correct values. Don't know what my error here...

Hoping that someone could help me.

Thank you.

Kind regards

Ed

Hello

If you just want to know the values that are not available in materialfolder, use a NOT EXISTS condition:

SELECT m.material_id

m.MATERIAL_TYPE_ID

$m.name

m.created

MATERIAL m

If NOT EXISTS (select null from materialfolder mf

where m.material_id = mf.material_id

)

AND m.CREATED > = TO_DATE('01/01/2011', 'dd/mm/yyyy') AND m.CREATED< to_date('01/01/2014',="">

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • LEFT JOIN question

    Hello

    Here's 2 queries. First one help for the joints and the second query uses a join ancient. The first works very well and I tried to write the 2nd one to work exactly like the first. I don't know where to put the sub condition sysdate in 2nd query such that there operator.

      AND trunc(SYSDATE) BETWEEN hapf.effective_start_date(+) AND
           hapf.effective_end_date(+)
    

    1.

    SELECT papf.full_name,
           hapf.name position_name
      FROM per_people_x       papf,
           per_assignments_x  pax,
           hr_all_positions_f hapf
     WHERE papf.person_id = pax.person_id
           AND pax.position_id = hapf.position_id(+)
           AND trunc(SYSDATE) BETWEEN hapf.effective_start_date(+) AND
           hapf.effective_end_date(+)
    

    2.

    SELECT papf.full_name,
           hapf.name position_name
      FROM per_people_x      papf,
           per_assignments_x pax
      LEFT JOIN hr_all_positions_f hapf
        ON (pax.position_id = hapf.position_id)
     WHERE papf.person_id = pax.person_id
    

    Any suggestion is appreciated.

    Thank you

    KK

    SELECT papf.full_name,

    hapf. Name position_name

    THE women's wear per_people_x

    JOIN THE

    Pax per_assignments_x

    ON)

    PAPF.person_id = pax.person_id

    )

    LEFT JOIN

    hr_all_positions_f hapf

    ON)

    Pax.POSITION_ID = hapf.position_id

    AND

    trunc (sysdate) BETWEEN hapf.effective_start_date AND hapf.effective_end_date

    )

    /

    SY.

  • LEFT JOIN and performance

    Hi guys,.

    I inherited a previous devloper the query below. T_MAXVALUES has 100,000 rows and T_STA_ERG about 1 m.

    The performance is so bad, it works for 5 hours now and I have nothing so I can´t say much about the data of test or how it should look.

    It works on Oracle 11 g and I can´t get my head around all JOIN clauses and the ultimate goal but sense that there could be a better way

    to achieve what is tried below. All of you guru´s able to immediately spot the big failures?

    SELECT DISTINCT T1. PARAMETER, T1. ZERL_MATRIX, T1. MONTHS, T1. ADDITIONAL_CRI,

    DECODE (H2. MRL, NULL, (DECODE (H1. MRL, NULL, (DECODE (H3. MRL, NULL, (DECODE (H4. MRL, NULL, NULL, 'R')), 'R')), M1. MRL)), H2. MRL)

    OF T_STA_ERG T1

    LEFT JOIN (SELECT PARAMETER, ZERL_MATRIX_2, MRL

    OF T_MAXVALUES, WHERE ZERL_MATRIX_1 IS NULL) H1

    ON T1. PARAMETER = H1. PARAMETER

    AND substr (T1. ZERL_MATRIX, 4, 3) = H1. ZERL_MATRIX_2

    LEFT JOIN (SELECT PARAMETER, ZERL_MATRIX_1, ZERL_MATRIX_2, MRL

    OF T_MAXVALUES

    WHERE ZERL_MATRIX_1 IS NOT NULL) H2

    ON T1. PARAMETER = H2. PARAMETER

    AND substr (T1. ZERL_MATRIX, 1, 3) = H2. ZERL_MATRIX_1

    AND substr (T1. ZERL_MATRIX, 4, 3) = H2. ZERL_MATRIX_2

    LEFT JOIN (SELECT PARAMETER, ZERL_MATRIX_2, MRL

    OF T_MAXVALUES

    WHERE ZERL_MATRIX_1 IS NULL) H3

    ON T1. PARAMETER = H3. PARAMETER

    LEFT JOIN T_MAXVALUES H4

    ON substr (T1. ZERL_MATRIX, 1, 3) = H4. ZERL_MATRIX_1

    The idea is to get maxvalues lines that at least match the lines of t. The game minimum is the game of columns of the parameter (type 3), or matches the matrix 1 (type 4).

    If you get all possible matches, and you will then take the MRLS of the best match: better if the parameter, matrix1 and matrix2 all game, then if parameter and matrix2 match, etc.

    What I have not included here are a test for null matrix1. If a match where parameter and matrix2 match, but there's a matrix1 value that does not match the value in T matrix1, will have to be thrown out, then just add this additional condition in the CASE statement.

    Untested of course:

    Select T1. PARAMETER, T1. ZERL_MATRIX, T1. MONTHS, T1. ADDITIONAL_CRI, Max (MRL) keep dense_rank of first order by type)

    Of

    (SELECT T1. PARAMETER, T1. ZERL_MATRIX, T1. MONTHS, T1. ADDITIONAL_CRI,

    -case when T1. PARAMETER = H.PARAMETER and substr (T1. ZERL_MATRIX, 1, 3) = H2. ZERL_MATRIX_1 AND substr (T1. ZERL_MATRIX, 4, 3) = H2. ZERL_MATRIX_2 then 1

    When T1. PARAMETER = H.PARAMETER and substr (T1. ZERL_MATRIX, 4, 3) = H1. ZERL_MATRIX_2 then 2

    When T1. PARAMETER = H.PARAMETER then 3

    When substr (T1. ZERL_MATRIX, 1, 3) = H.ZERL_MATRIX_1 then 4

    end match_type, h.mrl

    OF T_STA_ERG T1

    LEFT JOIN T_MAXVALUES h on (T1. PARAMETER = H.PARAMETER or substr (T1. (ZERL_MATRIX, 1, 3) = H.ZERL_MATRIX_1)

    )

    Group T1. PARAMETER, T1. ZERL_MATRIX, T1. MONTHS, T1. ADDITIONAL_CRI;

  • LEFT JOIN increases the number of lines

    Hi guys,.

    I had a problem, my left join retrieves multiple values. I know he has only 252 in there that correspond to the place where

    condition. If I use the table in a left join with the same condition where my row count increases.

    -1176 lines

    Select count (erg_ID) of

    MySchema. T_STA_ERG sta_erg

    INNER JOIN T_MEN hoechst

    ON sta_erg. PARAMETER = hoechst. PARAMETER

    AND sta_erg. JAHR = 2014

    where sta_erg. MESSERG_KNG = 'A' AND sta_erg. MESSERG_ALPHA IN ('03 ") and sta_erg. NORM_MESS is null

    -252 lines

    Select distinct erg_ID myschema. T_STA_ERG sta_erg where sta_erg. MESSERG_KNG = 'A' AND sta_erg. MESSERG_ALPHA IN ('03 ") and sta_erg. NORM_MESS is null

    any clue´s how I can build in conditions in my join which would not increase the results of the line?

    Why not just an inner join then?

  • Clarification on NULL or behavior LEFT JOIN behavior

    Good day ladies------Gentlemen\ gurus-Experts-and Al:

    Just when I thought I got my mind wrapped around the notion of NULL value, as defined by Oracle, I met what follows below.  Basically, what you are watching is how our employees of the human resources tables are set up (for the most part).  We have the employees, employee contracts table and the tables of positions.  When I want to make a list of active staff, I always use the filter end date, you will see below in the Super request, essentially looking for staff who do not have a contract AND a position end date entered in the DB.  It works like a charm.  However, today, I noticed an official on the list, who has never had a position is entered in the comic book, and he had an 'open' contract  In my example below, why would "Hal Jordan" appear on the active staff list?  Yes, he spends the first part of my predicate (contract_end is null), but it does not work (at least by my understanding) past the second part of the predicate which is position_end has the value NULL because there not even a record is entered in the comics!  Why would he appear?  Is it because of the LEFT JOIN or a NULL rule type, I'm not aware of?  Thanks for your help!

    Aqua

    EMPLOYEES AS

    (

    SELECT '10' AS emp_id, 'Banner' last_name, 'Robert' NAME FROM dual

    UNION ALL

    SELECT '20', 'Wayne', 'Bruce' OF THE double

    UNION ALL

    SELECT '30', 'Kent', 'Clark' FROM dual

    UNION ALL

    SELECT "40", "Parker", "Peter" OF THE double

    UNION ALL

    SELECT '50', 'Last', 'Tony' FROM dual

    UNION ALL

    SELECT '60', 'Jordan', 'Hal' OF THE double

    ),

    emp_contracts AS

    (

    SELECT '10' AS emp_id, to_date (January 1, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "") LIKE contract_start, to_date (1 January 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') AS contract_end FROM dual

    UNION ALL

    To_date '10', SELECT (January 1, 2010 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (December 31, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    To_date '10', SELECT (January 2, 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), double NULL

    UNION ALL

    To_date '20', SELECT (January 1, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    To_date '20', SELECT (January 1, 2010 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (December 31, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    To_date '20', SELECT (January 2, 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), double NULL

    UNION ALL

    To_date '30', SELECT (January 1, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    To_date '30', SELECT (January 1, 2010 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (December 31, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    To_date '30', SELECT (January 2, 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), double NULL

    UNION ALL

    To_date '40', SELECT (January 1, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY'), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') FROM dual

    UNION ALL

    To_date '40', SELECT (January 1, 2010 ',' MON-DD-YYYY'), to_date (December 31, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') FROM dual

    UNION ALL

    To_date '40', SELECT (January 2, 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), double NULL

    UNION ALL

    To_date '50', SELECT (January 1, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    To_date '50', SELECT (January 1, 2010 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (December 31, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    To_date '50', SELECT (January 2, 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), double NULL

    UNION ALL

    To_date '60', SELECT (January 1, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    To_date '60', SELECT (January 1, 2010 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (December 31, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    To_date '60', SELECT (January 2, 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), double NULL

    ),

    emp_positions AS

    (

    SELECT '10' AS emp_id, '43XY' AS title_id, to_date (January 1, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY "") LIKE position_start, to_date (1 January 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') AS position_end FROM dual

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 10', '47NT', to_date (January 1, 2010 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (December 31, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 10', '41JE', to_date (January 2, 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), double NULL

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 20', '48AW', to_date (January 1, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 20', '42KD', to_date (January 1, 2010 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (December 31, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 20', '46LD', to_date (January 2, 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), double NULL

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 30 ', 45 MI', to_date (January 1, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY'), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') FROM dual

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 30', '44KH', to_date (January 1, 2010 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (December 31, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 30', '43LL', to_date (January 2, 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), double NULL

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 40', '41', to_date (January 1, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 40', '40', to_date (January 1, 2010 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (December 31, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 40', '42DX', to_date (January 2, 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), double NULL

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 50', '48IB', to_date (January 1, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), to_date (1 January 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') OF double

    UNION ALL

    SELECT '50 ', 47 DL', to_date (January 1, 2010 ',' MON-DD-YYYY'), to_date (December 31, 2011 ',' MON-DD-YYYY') FROM dual

    UNION ALL

    SELECT ' 50', '42A', to_date (January 2, 2012 ',' MON-DD-YYYY ""), double NULL

    )

    SELECT

    1. ES.emp_id,
    2. ES.last_name,
    3. ES.first_name,
    4. EP.title_id,
    5. EP.position_start,
    6. EP.position_end

    Employees are

    LEFT JOIN emp_contracts ec

    ON ec.emp_id = es.first_name

    LEFT JOIN emp_positions ep

    ON ep.emp_id = es.emp_id

    WHERE ec.contract_end IS NULL AND ep.position_end IS NULL

    Hello

    AquaNX4 wrote:

    Good day ladies------Gentlemen\ gurus-Experts-and Al:

    Just when I thought I got my mind wrapped around the notion of NULL value, as defined by Oracle, I met what follows below.  Basically, what you are watching is how our employees of the human resources tables are set up (for the most part).  We have the employees, employee contracts table and the tables of positions.  When I want to make a list of active staff, I always use the filter end date, you will see below in the Super request, essentially looking for staff who do not have a contract AND a position end date entered in the DB.  It works like a charm.  However, today, I noticed an official on the list, who has never had a position is entered in the comic book, and he had an 'open' contract  In my example below, why would "Hal Jordan" appear on the active staff list?  Yes, he spends the first part of my predicate (contract_end is null), but it does not work (at least by my understanding) past the second part of the predicate which is position_end has the value NULL because there not even a record is entered in the comics!  Why would he appear?  Is it because of the LEFT JOIN or a NULL rule type, I'm not aware of?  ...

    It's the outer join.

    When you say

    Employees are

    LEFT JOIN emp_positions ON ep.emp_id = es.emp_id ep

    then, at the time when the WHERE clause is evaluated, the result set contains at least 1 row for each line of employees.  If there is no line in emp_postitions that meet the join condition, then all the columns that should be provided by the emp_positions table will be NULL. This is precisely what concerns the outer join.

    Think about it for a minute.  NULL means the absence of any value.  Is there is no corresponding row in the emp_positions table, then there is no value for emp_position.position_end.  If so doesn't; "have a value, then, by definition, it is NULL.

    It if were not NULL, then this would mean that it had a value.  Would what value?  Why the request would give him one value rather than another?

    Thanks for the display of the data of the sample; It's always useful!

  • Double left join creates a unwanted loop...

    I have therefore two paintings, I need to extract the counts of "tickets".

    I want to have the date given match then I use a 'connect by level' so that the same dates without data will have records in the result set.

    There are two tables I want to join on this "timeline" when I join each of them that individually, it works but when I join together that there is an order of operations issue I'm not sure how to move.

    ORIGINAL DATA:

    TABLE SMINCREQ:

    OPEN_DATE NUMBER
    JANUARY 12, 2015IM392039
    JANUARY 12, 2015IM399495
    JANUARY 12, 2015RM394950
    JANUARY 13, 2015IM394958
    JANUARY 13, 2015
    RM394958

    TABLE SMINTERACTIONS:

    OPEN_DATE INCIDENT_ID
    JANUARY 12, 2015SD394858
    JANUARY 12, 2015SD399495
    JANUARY 12, 2015SD394950
    JANUARY 13, 2015SD394958
    JANUARY 13, 2015
    SD394958

    THE QUERY:

    SELECT to_char(DAYS_,'DD-MON-YYYY'),
          
          sum(decode(INSTR(SMINCREQ."NUMBER",'IM'),'1','1',0)) "INCIDENT",
          sum(decode(INSTR(SMINCREQ."NUMBER",'RM'),'1','1',0)) "REQUEST"
         --sum(decode(INSTR(SMINTERACTIONS.INCIDENT_ID,'SD'),'1','1',0)) "INTERACTION"  
          FROM
      ( SELECT (TRUNC(to_date(SYSDATE-ROWNUM),'DD')) DAYS_ FROM DUAL
    CONNECT BY LEVEL <= (SELECT 14 FROM DUAL)
      ) THE_TIMELINE
        LEFT OUTER JOIN SMINCREQ ON  (to_char(DAYS_,'DD-MON-YYYY')=to_char(SMINCREQ.OPEN_TIME,'DD-MON-YYYY')  and (OPEN_GROUP like '%HELP%'))
        --LEFT OUTER JOIN SMINTERACTIONS on (to_char(DAYS_,'DD-MON-YYYY')=to_char(SMINTERACTIONS.OPEN_TIME,'DD-MON-YYYY')  and PRIMARY_ASSIGNMENT_GROUP like '%HELP%')
        GROUP BY to_char(DAYS_,'DD-MON-YYYY') ORDER BY to_char(DAYS_,'DD-MON-YYYY')
      ;
    
    

    When I run the present and just get the number of SMINCREQ is

    DATEINCIDENTSREQUEST
    JANUARY 12, 20151034
    JANUARY 13, 20155910

    When I run the query for SMINTERACTIONS I get

    DATEINTERACTION
    JANUARY 12, 201555
    JANUARY 13, 201550

    When I try to run the two left joins them together I get:

    DATEINCIDENTSAPPLICATIONSINTERACTIONS
    JANUARY 12, 201556652205885
    JANUARY 13, 201529505003450

    I know that what is happening is a loop where the date is is developed in a relationship 1 to many through the joints and then the GROUP is not the case until the end.

    What I want to achieve is:

    DATEINCIDENTSREQIESTINTERACTION
    JANUARY 12, 2015103455
    JANUARY 13, 2015591050

    Thanks for the tips

    I decided to go this route that will just join the new data (INTERACTIONS) of INCIDENTS already implemented and APPLICATIONS:

    SELECT NULL LINK,DAYS,INCIDENT,"REQUEST",sum(decode(INSTR(SMINTERACTIONS.INCIDENT_ID,'SD'),'1','1',0)) "INTERACTION" from(
    
    SELECT to_char(DAYS_,'DD-MON-YYYY') DAYS,sum(decode(INSTR(SMINCREQ."NUMBER",'IM'),'1','1',0)) "INCIDENT",
          sum(decode(INSTR(SMINCREQ."NUMBER",'RM'),'1','1',0)) "REQUEST"
          FROM
      ( SELECT (TRUNC(to_date(SYSDATE-ROWNUM),'DD')) DAYS_ FROM DUAL
     CONNECT BY LEVEL <= (SELECT 14 FROM DUAL)
      ) THE_TIMELINE
        LEFT OUTER JOIN SMINCREQ ON  (to_char(DAYS_,'DD-MON-YYYY')=to_char(SMINCREQ.OPEN_TIME,'DD-MON-YYYY')  and (OPEN_GROUP like '%HELP CENTER%')
    )
    
        GROUP BY to_char(DAYS_,'DD-MON-YYYY') ORDER BY to_char(DAYS_,'DD-MON-YYYY')
    ) LEFT JOIN SMINTERACTIONS on (DAYS=to_char(OPEN_TIME,'DD-MON-YYYY') and (PRIMARY_ASSIGNMENT_GROUP like '%HELP CENTER%'))
    GROUP BY DAYS,INCIDENT,"REQUEST" order by DAYS ASC;
    

    Thanks for all the entries...

  • LEFT JOIN DUPLICATION PROBLEM

    Hello

    I'm having a problem with the left join query, when I join table a two table based on column task1 I get duplicate in table1.task1, table1.price.

    Table1. Task1Table1. Pricetable2. Task1table2. Resourcetable2. Price
    001100001A50
    001100001B250

    How can I make a request to get a result as below.

    Table1. Task1Table1. Pricetable2.Task2table2. Resourcetable2. Price
    001100001A50
    001B250

    Thank you.

    Note that your query uses an inner join. Your original question mentioned a join left, generally interpreted as meaning a left OUTER join.

    Anyway, according to Frank, you can use the BREAK command in SQL * Plus for the goal sought through formatting. You can also use an analytical function as Roger suggests. I think ROW_NUMBER() might do the trick, but we must be clear about the criteria for partitioning and ordering the results, for example

    WITH table1 AS (
      SELECT '001' AS task1
           , 100 AS price
      FROM   dual
    ), table2 AS (
      SELECT '001' AS task1
           , 'A' AS resources
           , 50 AS price
      FROM   dual
      UNION ALL
      SELECT '001' AS task1
           , 'B' AS resources
           , 250 AS price
      FROM   dual
    )
    SELECT DECODE(ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY t1.task1, t1.price ORDER BY t2.resources, t2.price),1,t1.task1) AS task1_alt
         , DECODE(ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY t1.task1, t1.price ORDER BY t2.resources, t2.price),1,t1.price) AS price_alt
         , t2.task1 AS task_with_resource
         , t2.resources
         , t2.price
    FROM   table1 t1
    INNER JOIN table2 t2
    ON     t1.task1 = t2.task1
    ORDER BY t1.task1, t1.price, t2.resources, t2.price;
    
  • How to avoid the union and use a left join

    Hello

    I have the following tables

    {code}

    create the table mainTable

    (col1 varchar2 (2) varchar2 (2) col2, col3 varchar2 (2), col4 varchar2 (2));

    create table secTable

    (col1 varchar2 (2));

    create the table secTable1

    (col2 varchar2 (2));

    create the table secTable2

    (col3 varchar2 (2));

    Insert in maintable

    values ('a', 'b', 'this,' would be ');

    Insert in maintable

    values (', 'o', 'n', 'p');

    insert into secTable

    values ('a');

    insert into secTable1

    values ('b');

    insert into secTable2

    values ('c');

    commit;

    {code}

    I made a request, drank, I would use join without clause union how can I change to receive the same result as the following query?

    {code}

    Select t1.*, 'bad value' | T1.Col1
    from maintable t1
    T1.Col1 left join t2 = t2.col1 sectable
    where t2.col1 is null
    Union of all the
    Select t1.*, 'bad value' | T1.col2
    from maintable t1
    Join t2 left on t1.col1 = t2.col2 sectable1
    where t2.col2 is null
    Union of all the
    Select t1.*, 'bad value' | T1. COL3
    from maintable t1
    Join t2 left on t1.col1 = t2.col3 sectable2
    where t2.col3 is null

    {code}

    Thank you

    Coco

    Like this?:

    SQL > SELECT col1, col2, col3, col4, xvalue

    2 from (SELECT m0.*

    3, NVL (t0.col1, 'bad value t0' | m0.col1) t0_col1

    4, NVL (t1.col2, 'bad value t1' | m0.col2) t0_col2

    5, NVL (t2.col3, 'bad value t2' | m0.col3) t0_col3

    Maintable m0 6

    LEFT OUTER JOIN sectable t0 7

    8. WE (m0.col1 = t0.col1

    9 AND t0.col1 IS NULL)

    10 LEFT OUTER JOIN sectable1 t1

    11. WE (m0.col1 t1.col2 =

    12 AND t1.col2 IS NULL)

    13 LEFT OUTER JOIN t2 sectable2

    14. WE (m0.col1 = t2.col3

    15 t2.col3 AND IS NULL))

    16 UNPIVOT INCLUDES NULL values (xvalue wrongly IN (t0_col1, t0_col2, t0_col3))

    17 ORDER BY xvalue

    18.

    COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4 XVALUE

    ------ ------ ------ ------ ---------------------------------------------------

    a b c d bad value t0 a

    m o n p bad value m t0

    a b c d bad value t1 b

    m o n p o t1 value of evil

    a b c d bad value t2 c

    m o n p value t2 n bad

    6 selected lines.

  • Interesting behavior of left join

    We will create 3 tables as follows:


    CREATE TABLE "A1" ()"A1_ID" NUMBER ENABLE NON NULL,CONSTRAINT "A1_PK" SELECT the PRIMARY KEY ('A1_ID') );

    CREATE TABLE "A2" ()"A2_ID" NUMBER ENABLE NON NULL,CONSTRAINT "A2_PK" SELECT the PRIMARY KEY ('A2_ID'));

    CREATE TABLE "A12" ()'A12_ID' ENABLE NUMBER NOT NULL,'A1_ID' ENABLE NUMBER NOT NULL,'A2_ID' ENABLE NUMBER NOT NULL,"A12_PK" PRIMARY KEY ('A12_ID'), CONSTRAINTREFERENCES of FOREIGN ("A1_ID") of CONSTRAINT "A12_A1_FK1" "BUTUNLESIK" KEY "" A1 "("A1_ID") ENABLE,KEY REFERENCES FOREIGN ("A2_ID") of CONSTRAINT 'A12_A2_FK1' 'BUTUNLESIK '. ("" A2 "("A2_ID") ALLOW);

    We insert the values as follows:

    Insert into A1 values (1);

    Insert into A1 values (2);

    Insert into A1 values (3);

    Insert 4 A1;

    Insert into A1 values (5);

    Insert into A1 values (6);

    Insert into A2 values (1);

    insert into values A12 (1,1,1);

    Tables a1 and A2 are just simple tables with primary keys and A12 table contains many-to-many relationship between them.

    When I run the query below,

    SELECT * A1 A1 A12 A12 LEFT JOIN ON a1.a1_id = a12.a1_id A2 LEFT JOIN A2 ON a2.a2_id = a12.a2_id WHERE a2.a2_id IS NULL;

    I get the following results, as I predicted:

    A1_ID A12_ID A1_ID A2_ID A2_ID

    ----------     ----------    ----------     ---------- ----------

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    However when I run the second query below (where I select only the a1 id column instead of "*")

    SELECT a1.a1_id A1 A1 A12 A12 LEFT JOIN ON a1.a1_id = a12.a1_id A2 LEFT JOIN A2 ON a2.a2_id = a12.a2_id WHERE a2.a2_id IS NULL;


    I get nothing, no lines have been selected. When I look at the plan of the second query I see a predicate to filter such as "'NULL IS NOT NULL". " I guess that this does not return results. Is this a bug, or y at - it a satisfactory explanation for this behavior?

    Step 1 - check the execution plans.

    At first glance, this looks like a variant of https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2594321

    Concerning

    Jonathan Lewis

  • Left join of the two tables and multiple values into a single value separated by commas

    Hello

    I have following tables with their structures and their data as below.

    CREATE TABLE 'BETODI '. "" BETINFO ".

    (

    VARCHAR2 (8 BYTE) "CURRENTPRESS."

    ENABLE 'TYPEIDCONTAINER' VARCHAR2 (30 BYTE) NOT NULL

    )

    INSERT INTO Betinfo (Currentpress, typeidcontainer) VALUES ('A24G', 'PMC');

    INSERT INTO Betinfo (Currentpress, typeidcontainer) VALUES ('A24D', 'Pensky-MARTENS');

    INSERT INTO Betinfo (Currentpress, typeidcontainer) VALUES ("A25D", "CMP");

    INSERT INTO Betinfo (Currentpress, typeidcontainer) VALUES ('A25G', 'PMC');

    INSERT INTO Betinfo (Currentpress, typeidcontainer) VALUES ('A26D', 'PMC');

    INSERT INTO Betinfo (Currentpress, typeidcontainer) VALUES ('A26G', 'PMC');

    INSERT INTO Betinfo (Currentpress, typeidcontainer) VALUES ("A32G", "V-BFC3");

    INSERT INTO Betinfo (Currentpress, typeidcontainer) VALUES ('A32D', "V-BFC2");

    CREATE TABLE 'BETODI '. "" BETMASTER ".

    (

    ACTIVATE THE "CUREPRESS" TANK (5 BYTES) NOT NULL,

    ACTIVATE THE "TYPE" VARCHAR2 (5 BYTE) NOT NULL,

    NUMBER (5.0) "LASTPCIRIM".

    )

    INSERT INTO BetMaster (Curepress, type, lastpcirim) VALUES ('A24', '45 M 8', 15);

    INSERT INTO BetMaster (Curepress, type, lastpcirim) VALUES ('A25', 42 16', 15);

    INSERT INTO BetMaster (Curepress, type, lastpcirim) VALUES ("A26", 16' 45, 15);

    INSERT INTO BetMaster (Curepress, type, lastpcirim) VALUES ("A27", '45 M 34', 16);

    INSERT INTO BetMaster (Curepress, type, lastpcirim) VALUES ('A28', '45 M 34', 16);

    INSERT INTO BetMaster (Curepress, type, lastpcirim) VALUES ('A29', '45 M 34', 16);

    INSERT INTO BetMaster (Curepress, type, lastpcirim) VALUES ('A30', '45MCH', 15);

    INSERT INTO BetMaster (Curepress, type, lastpcirim) VALUES ("A31", "45MCH", 16);

    INSERT INTO BetMaster (Curepress, type, lastpcirim) VALUES ('A32', '45MCH', 16);

    INSERT INTO BetMaster (Curepress, type, lastpcirim) VALUES ('A33', '45MCH', 16);

    INSERT INTO BetMaster (Curepress, type, lastpcirim) VALUES ("A34", "45MCH", 16);

    These two tables have left join as

    BETMASTER. CUREPRESS = substr (BETINFO. CURRENTPRESS, 1, 3)

    now I want to have the data in the two tables with fields Curepress, Lastpcirim, typeidcontainer.

    Also something like

    Make a group of typeidcontainer if this value is greater than 1 by press separated the values of semicolon (;)

    So, for example above, we should be given as

    A24 PMC 15; PENSKY-MARTENS

    A25 15 PMC

    A26 15 PMC

    A27 16 (NULL)

    A28 16 (NULL)

    A30 15 (NULL)

    A31 16 (NULL)

    A32 16 BFC2-V; V BFC3

    A33 16 (NULL)

    A34 16 (NULL)

    How could do?

    My current request is as

    Select distinct Curepress, lastpcirim, typeidcontainer

    BETMASTER STD left join INF BETINFO

    on the trim (STD. CUREPRESS) = substr (trim (INF. CURRENTPRESS), 1, 3)

    but I am unable to get the values separated by commas.

    Any help would be appreciated.

    Thank you

    Mahesh.

    Hi, Mahesh,

    If you want to only 1 row of output for each distinct combination of currentpress and lastpcirim?  This sounds like a job for GROUP BY.

    And you want the row to contain a list of all different typidcontainers-delimited?  This sounds like a job for the aggregate LISTAGG function.

    WITH joined_data AS

    (

    SELECT DISTINCT

    MST.curepress, mst.lastpcirim, inf.typeidcontainer

    OF betmaster STD

    LEFT JOIN betinfo ON TRIM (mst.curepress) inf = SUBSTR (TRIM (inf.currentpress)

    1

    3

    )

    )

    SELECT curepress, lastpcirim

    LISTAGG (typeidcontainer, ',')

    THE Group (ORDER BY typeidcontainer) AS container_list

    OF joined_data

    Curepress GROUP, lastpcirim

    ;

    Unfortunately, you can't say LISTAGG (DISTINCT ...), so you should always get the separate containers how you already are.  (Note that the subquery is just what you posted).

    Thanks for posting the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements; It is very useful.  Don't forget to tell what version of Oracle you are using.  LISTAGG was new in Oracle 11.2.

    Why not add CHECK constraints (and perhaps triggers) to your tables, so that curepress and currentpress are not stored with the head or trailing spaces?  Then you wouldn't need to use the PAD in queries like this, and your code would be simpler and more effective.

  • Left join between two tables using two different conditions

    I have following three tables with their data, as shown below.

    CREATE TABLE TIREMASTERPROCESS_TEMP
    (
    PRODUCTIONCODE TANK (12 BYTES),
    FIELDNAME CHAR (12 BYTES),
    DATACHR VARCHAR2 (60 BYTE),
    REVISIONNO TANK (3 BYTES),
    DATANUM NUMBER (9.4)
    )
    Whether the table c. and its sample data are like

    FIELDNAME DATACHR REVISIONNO DATANUM PRODUCTIONCODE
    AB No. Nch 1 100 0
    AB No. Nch 1 108 0
    AB No.-of-Nch 1 1 0
    Ass42 teased dishes 1 0
    Ass42 BTDrumNo1 BTD-051 1 0
    AB53 BTDrumNo1 BTD-051 104 0


    CREATE TABLE materialcode
    (
    UPPERMATERIALCODE CHAR (20),
    PROCESSNO TANK (3),
    PROCESSADOPTDATE TANK (9)

    )
    Whether the table b. and its sample data are like

    UPPERMATERIALCODE PROCESSNO PROCESSADOPTDATE
    Ass42 1 20120717
    AB53 108 20121121
    111 20111104 AS05
    104 20120928 AS30


    CREATE TABLE BUILDINGSCHEDULEMASTER
    (
    BUILDINGSIZE TANK (5 BYTES),
    GTCODE FLOAT (4 BYTES),
    TIREPERCART NUMBER (3.0).
    BUILDINGLOT NUMBER (3.0)
    )
    Whether table and its sample data are like

    BUILDINGSIZE GTCODE TIREPERCART BUILDINGLOT
    AB42A 4 12 ass42
    AB53A 4 88 AB53
    AS30A AS30 4 80
    BF03A 1 90 BF03


    Now, I need to get some data in these fields by using the suite of mappings.

    « PR_ » || Trim (a.BUILDINGSIZE) | ' / MPL2' Processid,--PRIMARY KEY
    TO_DATE (substr (NVL(b.PROCESSADOPTDATE,'19800101'), 7, 2) |) » /'|| SUBSTR (NVL(b.PROCESSADOPTDATE,'19800101'), 5, 2) | » /'|| SUBSTR (NVL(b.PROCESSADOPTDATE,'19800101'), 1, 4). (' 01:00:00 ',' dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss') starteff, to_date (SUBSTR (NVL(b.PROCESSADOPTDATE,'19800101'), 7, 2) |) » /'|| SUBSTR (NVL(b.PROCESSADOPTDATE,'19800101'), 5, 2) | » /'|| SUBSTR (NVL(b.PROCESSADOPTDATE,'19800101'), 1, 4). (' 01:00:00 ',' dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss') startDate.
    b.PROCESSNO revisioncodeid,
    a.BUILDINGLOT tirepercart ,
    CASE WHEN c.FIELDNAME = 'BTDrumNo1' then c.DATACHR end drumtype1.
    BOX WHEN (trim (C.DATACHR) = '1' and trim (C.FIELDNAME) = "No. Nch") and THEN click 'YES '.
    ANOTHER 'NO '.
    END may-BUG,
    case
    When c.FIELDNAME = 'Wavy'
    AND c.DATACHR = 'Use' THEN on 'YES '.
    When c.FIELDNAME = 'Wavy'
    AND c.DATACHR <>'Use' THEN 'NO '.
    fine wavy


    Now for the tables A and B I have the simple join as condition

    a.GTCODE = b.UPPERMATERIALCODE

    But I have to use two different left join conditions to join the table B and C to calculate the RESP fields according to the condition.
    Now, I have to use

    (trim (b.UPPERMATERIALCODE)). » -'|| Trim (b.PROCESSNO) = Trim (c.PRODUCTIONCODE) | » -'|| Trim (c.REVISIONNO)

    condition to get the data for the WAVY and DRUMTYPE1 fields.

    But at the same time, I have to use

    substr (Trim (b.UPPERMATERIALCODE), 1, 2). » -'|| Trim (b.PROCESSNO) = Trim (c.PRODUCTIONCODE) | » -'|| Trim (c.REVISIONNO)

    conition to derive the CHAFER field.

    And for this reason I am come so many duplicates and do not correct results for JUNEBUG, WAVY, DRUMTYPE1, and STARTDATE field.

    I need some advice as how can I do so that I get the correct results without duplicates for the PRIMARY KEY.

    Thank you

    Mahesh

    It would have been easier to answer if you gave us your example query that gives incorrect results - which both show us what you are doing and give us a starting point.
    Insert instructions for data, rather than only the data would have helped too, making it more quick to test this point.
    You do not show what you have done with your two outer join criteria, but I think you need to list TIREMASTERPROCESS_TEMP in your query twice, with alias names. Here's what I did:

    select a.BUILDINGSIZE, a.GTCODE, b.PROCESSNO ,  c1.FIELDNAME, c1.DATACHR, C2.FIELDNAME, C2.DATACHR
    , CASE WHEN c1.FIELDNAME='BTDrumNo1' then c1.DATACHR end drumtype1
    , CASE WHEN (trim(c2.DATACHR) = '1' and trim(c2.FIELDNAME) = 'No-of-Nch') THEN 'YES' ELSE 'NO' END CHAFER
    , case when c1.FIELDNAME='Wavy' AND c1.DATACHR='Use' THEN 'YES'
           when c1.FIELDNAME='Wavy' then 'NO' else null end wavy
    from BUILDINGSCHEDULEMASTER        A
    join materialcode b on a.GTCODE=b.UPPERMATERIALCODE
    left outer join TIREMASTERPROCESS_TEMP c1
       ON trim(b.UPPERMATERIALCODE)||'-'||trim(b.PROCESSNO) = trim(c1.PRODUCTIONCODE)||'-'||trim(c1.REVISIONNO)
    left outer join TIREMASTERPROCESS_TEMP c2
       ON substr(trim(b.UPPERMATERIALCODE),1,2)||'-'||trim(b.PROCESSNO) = trim(c2.PRODUCTIONCODE)||'-'||trim(c2.REVISIONNO)
    

    C1 is an alias for the TIREMASTERPROCESS_TEMP line which is necessary for drumtype1 and wavy, c2 is an alias for the TIREMASTERPROCESS_TEMP line required for JuneBug. There was some minor errors in your calculations of field I tried to correct.

    The results are:

    BUILD GTCO PRO FIELDNAME    DATACHR    FIELDNAME    DATACHR    DRUMTYPE1  CHA WAV
    ----- ---- --- ------------ ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- --- ---
    AB53A AB53 108                         No-of-Nch    1                     YES
    AB42A AB42 1   BTDrumNo1    BTD-051    No-of-Nch    1          BTD-051    YES
    AB42A AB42 1   Wavy         NotUse     No-of-Nch    1                     YES NO
    AS30A AS30 104                                                            NO
    

    Hope this helps,
    David

  • Left join on 3 tables

    I have 3 tables to know

    CUREPRESSMASTER,
    CUREBLDGMACHINECONDITION,
    NAMINGMASTER

    with the structure of each table as
    CUREPRESSMASTER: -.
    CUREPRESS CHAR (5)
    PRESSTYPE TANK (8)
    CURINGGROUP CHAR (2)

    examples of data
    "CUREPRESS" "PRESSTYPE'"CURINGGROUP ".
    'M02' "HAM OF 63.5" "31".
    "M03" "HAM OF 63.5" "31".
    "M04" "HAM OF 63.5" "31".
    "M05" "HAM OF 63.5" "31".
    "M06" "63.5" "31".
    "M07" "HAM OF 63.5" "31".
    "S03" "63.5" "31".
    "S04" "HAM OF 63.5" "31".
    "S05" "HAM OF 63.5" "31".

    CUREBLDGMACHINECONDITION: -.
    GROUPID (2) TANK
    MACHINENAME CHAR (5)
    DATA01 CHAR(10)
    DATA02 CHAR(10)
    Samples: -.

    'GROUPID' "MACHINENAME" "DATA01" "DATA02.
    '30' 'M03' "63.5" "UNDER".
    '30' 'M04""63.5""UNDER ".
    '30' 'M05""63.5""UNDER ".
    '30' 'M06""63.5""UNDER ".
    '30' 'M07""63.5""UNDER ".
    "30" "M08" "63.5" "UNDER".

    NAMINGMASTER: -.
    IETS1 CHAR (1)
    CLASSEMENT2 CHAR (2)
    CERTIFICATE3 TANK (2)
    NAMING2 CHAR (10)

    Samples: -.
    "IETS1" "CLASSEMENT2" "CERTIFICATE3'"NAMING2 ".
    "0' '52" "31" "281".
    '0' '69' "31" "110".
    '2' '30' "31" "TBR".
    "3' '30'"31""TIRE PLANT. "
    "0' '51" "31" "261".
    "A" "30" "31" "RP".
    "A" "31" "31" "RP".
    "H'" ""31""MTRLBhind. "
    "J"     "01"     "31"     ""
    "L"     "01"     "31"     ""
    "G"     " "     "31"     ""
    "8" "" "31" "CambioMedi."

    Now, I want to have all the rows of the table CUREPRESS left join with two other tables as specified below.
    CUREPRESSMASTER. CUREPRESS = CUREBLDGMACHINECONDITION. MACHINENAME
    CUREPRESSMASTER. CURINGGROUP = NAMINGMASTER. CERTIFICATE3.

    Now I want to select the following columns as CUREPRESS, PRESSTYPE, NAMING2, DATA01 DATA02 after leaving the joints as shown above and curepress as primary key.

    When I tried using a General left join she gave much more duplicate rows.
    I have 100 lines in curepress, then I would have only 100 lines in the final result but I get my as 233 lines output, this may be due to CUREPRESSMASTER. CURINGGROUP = NAMINGMASTER. Certificate3 this condition.

    Please suggest me some queries.

    This may be due to CUREPRESSMASTER. CURINGGROUP = NAMINGMASTER. Certificate3 this condition.

    Yes. Because the above join result in one-to-MANY relationship. Look at your data

    CUREPRESS PRESSTYPE CURINGGROUP
    --------- --------- -----------
    M02       63.5 HAM  31
    M03       63.5 HAM  31
    M04       63.5 HAM  31
    M05       63.5 HAM  31
    M06       63.5      31
    M07       63.5 HAM  31
    S03       63.5      31
    S04       63.5 HAM  31
    S05       63.5 HAM  31          
    
     9 rows selected 
    
    CLASSIFICATION1 CLASSIFICATION2 CLASSIFICATION3 NAMING2
    --------------- --------------- --------------- ----------
    0               52              31              281
    0               69              31              110
    2               30              31              TBR
    3               30              31              TIRE PLANT
    0               51              31              261
    A               30              31              PSR
    A               31              31              PSR
    H                               31              MTRLBhind
    J               01              31
    L               01              31
    G                               31
    8                               31              CambioMedi 
    
     12 rows selected 
    

    The value is 31 for all rows in the table two. And so 9 * 12 output will be 108 lines. Its one expected result how you expect to only 9 lines?

    You can show us your results as well. I guess you are missing some basic business requirements. Show us your results.

  • Seen the lock of brain on Left Join

    Always on Oracle 11.2.0.1.0

    Examples of data
    CREATE TABLE theEmails (
    RID NUMBER(10) PRIMARY KEY,
    employee NUMBER(6),
    emailType VARCHAR2(4),
    emailAddress VARCHAR2(50),
    emailActive number(1)
    )
    ;
    INSERT INTO theEmails VALUES(778437,231509,'OTHR','[email protected]',0);
    INSERT INTO theEmails VALUES(847168,231509,'WRK1','[email protected]',0);
    INSERT INTO theEmails VALUES(784690,231509,'OTHR','[email protected]',1);
    INSERT INTO theEmails VALUES(1459884,239868,'OTHR','[email protected]',0);
    INSERT INTO theEmails VALUES(1485781,239868,'OTHR','[email protected]',1);
    INSERT INTO theEmails VALUES(1485782,239868,'WRK1','[email protected]',0);
    INSERT INTO theEmails VALUES(1501028,231509,'WRK1','[email protected]',1);
    INSERT INTO theEmails VALUES(1492288,239868,'WRK1','[email protected]',1);
    INSERT INTO theEmails VALUES(1456785,239865,'OTHR','[email protected]',0);
    INSERT INTO theEmails VALUES(1489166,239865,'WRK1','[email protected]',0);
    INSERT INTO theEmails VALUES(1482668,239865,'WRK1','[email protected]',0);
    INSERT INTO theEmails VALUES(1482667,239865,'OTHR','[email protected]',1);
    
    
    
    CREATE TABLE thePeople (
    employee NUMBER(6),
    recordNum NUMBER(2),
    lastName VARCHAR2(20),
    firstName VARCHAR2(20)
    )
    ;
    
    INSERT INTO thePeople VALUES(231509,0,'P','Michelle');
    INSERT INTO thePeople VALUES(239868,0,'K','Dan');
    INSERT INTO thePeople VALUES(239865,0,'T','Mary');
    So, here is my SQL that does not work well:
    SELECT p.employee, p.recordNum, p.lastName, p.firstName, e.emailaddress, e.emailactive, e.emailtype
    FROM thePeople p LEFT JOIN theemails e ON p.employee = e.employee
    WHERE (e.emailactive = 1)
          AND
          (e.emailtype = 'WRK1')
          AND
          (e.emailaddress LIKE '%school.edu')
    ;
    AND this:
    SELECT p.employee, p.recordNum, p.lastName, p.firstName, e.emailaddress, e.emailactive, e.emailtype
    FROM thePeople p LEFT JOIN theemails e ON p.employee = e.employee
    WHERE (e.emailactive = 1 OR e.emailactive IS NULL)
          AND
          (e.emailtype = 'WRK1' OR e.emailtype IS NULL)
          AND
          (e.emailaddress LIKE '%school.edu' OR e.emailaddress IS NULL)
    Both give me this:

    employee | record | lastName. firstName. emailAddress. emailActive | emailType
    231509 | 0 | P     | Michelle | [email protected] | 1. WRK1


    But what I need is the following:
    employee | record | lastName. firstName. emailAddress. emailActive | emailType
    239868 | 0 | K     | Dan |      |     |
    231509 | 0 | P     | Michelle | [email protected] | 1. WRK1
    239865 | 0 | T     | Mary |          |


    Email from Dan is not included, because his "wrk1" email does not stop it school.edu
    E-mail Mary is not included, because his 'wrk1' email is not active.
    However, I need to come back with their numbers of name registration and employee.


    Once it works, I'll add employee = number in the WHERE clause, because I only need to find a person both for the actual production.

    What I am doing wrong?

    Thank you!

    Michelle

    Hello

    WHERE is the filtering actually record the selection.

    In your case, you might want to include in your LEFT OUTER JOIN ON conditions:

    SELECT p.employee, p.recordnum, p.lastname, p.firstname
         , e.emailaddress, e.emailactive, e.emailtype
      FROM    thepeople p
           LEFT JOIN
              theemails e
           ON     p.employee = e.employee
              AND e.emailactive = 1
              AND e.emailtype = 'WRK1'
              AND e.emailaddress LIKE '%school.edu';
    

    If you put them in your JOIN conditions actually join Chronogram of table theemails that adapt to the conditions of membership.
    As you use LEFT [OUTER] JOIN unmatched chronogram thepeople table will be displayed even when the theemail table column appears with a NULL value in the output files

    I hope that I was able to unlock your brain. :-)

    Kind regards.
    Al

    Published by: Alberto Faenza on 25 October 2012 16:58
    Additional note added

  • rewrite the left join

    Work according to code, but I want to rewrite them in the left join on style, how
    Select *.
    of a, b, c, d, e
    v_codeNumber f
    where a.my_numb = '5582017'
    and a.username = b.username
    and c.username = b.username
    and c.DEPARTMENT_CODE = d.TDEPT_CODE
    and c.discipline_num = f.discipline_num (+)

    You mean you want the ANSI syntax?

    select *
    from a join b on (a.username = b.username)
           join c on (c.username = b.username)
           join d on (c.DEPARTMENT_CODE= d.TDEPT_CODE)
           cross join e
           left join v_codeNumber f on (c.discipline_num = f.discipline_num)
    where a.my_numb ='5582017' 
    
  • left join problem?

    I want left join two tables (a, b) where a.account = b.accountNumber number and this join must occur only for the specified account numbers. For this, my request is as follows.

    Select a.PRIMARY_FIRST_NAME, a.PRIMARY_LAST_NAME, a.ACCOUNT_NUMBER, a.PRIMARY_SSN, a.ADDRESS_1, a.ADDRESS_2,
    a.CITY, a.STATE, a.ZIP, b.phone_number, cust_account_details a b.status
    Join phone_data b left
    on
    a.Account_Number = b.account_number
    and
    a.Account_Number in
    ('11 ', ' 22')


    The above does not work correctly. the join occurs not only for the numbers in the range. What could be the problem?

    Try this: -.

    select a.PRIMARY_FIRST_NAME,a.PRIMARY_LAST_NAME,a.ACCOUNT_NUMBER,a.PRIMARY_SSN,a.ADDRESS_1,a.ADDRESS_2,
    a.CITY,a.STATE,a.ZIP,b.phone_number,b.status from cust_account_details a
    left join phone_data b
    on
    a.account_number=b.account_number
    *where*
    a.account_number in
    ('11','22')
    

    Thank you.

Maybe you are looking for