Limits of the skeleton L

Similar Questions

• HP Z600: What processors am I limited with the hpz600 workstation?

  Hi, I have a HP Z600 that I bought refurbished. The vehicle currently has 2 x Xeon X 5560 2.8 cpus.

  I am struck with this configuration cpu load limit (I run the intensive 3d modeling software), and I want to improve.

  Am I limited with the motherboard on these workstations?

  Which processors that you would recommend? (I looking for a quite intensive help and have a few hundred dollars to spend).

  Thank you!

  anti1, older versions of the Z600 support microprocessors Intel 55xx only, later versions support as 55xx 56xx CPUs.  The best way to determine this is to boot the system, enter the BIOS F10 setup and look at the date of starting block.

  If the boot block date is 03/01/2009, the system supports the 55xx only processors.

  If the block start date is 07/01/2010, the system supports processors 55xx both 56xx.

  -C' is the block of start date, not the date of the version of the BIOS.

  -There is no way to update the boot block.  (There are several discussions in this forum about this)

  If your system has the block to start later, upgrade to a 6 core CPU 56xx will give best performance.  I think that the frequency of the processor 6 c is 3.47 GHz, although there is a 4 processor 3.6 GHz.  Your application supports multiple cores?

  To get an idea of any increase in performance, look at the reference site of CPU of the pass mark for the top processors of range, here.

  Based on these landmarks (I know, they are markers without real object numbers), you could get about 70% performance increase by using a X 5690 6 3.47 GHz CPU core.  Is it enough for your application?

• I lost the code for the option menu 'limitations' of the iPhone 4, how can you do then? so I can come and factory reset, it is a 4 digit code, so I can be able toexample factory reset the phone, don't know if this is the right forum for my question but

  I lost the code for the option menu 'limitations' of the iPhone 4, how can you do then? so I can come and factory reset, it is a 4 digit code, so I can be able toexample factory reset the phone, don't know if this is the right forum for my question but

  Sorry, but the restriction password cannot be reset, it is part of the backup and restore a backup that was taken after the restrictions were activated, restore this code again.

  You will have to start without the help of the data backup, configure the phone to factory settings and start over. Follow the steps mentioned in this article:

  Use iTunes to restore your device to factory settings - Support Apple iOS

  If you lose or forget your password restriction, you must erase your device and then put it up as a new device to remove the restriction password. Restore the device by using a backup does not delete the access code.

  copied from: Sur les Restrictions (parental control) on iPhone, iPad and iPod touch - Apple Support

• Engine step doesn't fail before reaching its physical limits for the sinusoidal movement

  Hello

  My ultimate goal is to skip a XY (via 2 linear actuators) in a circular motion (radius of 0.47 ") at a frequency of 1 Hz. I run the example VI 'Demo circle' which received my copy of LabView, version 9.0.

  The problem I encounter is that given the physical limitations of the engine and the drive motor, the task should technically be feasible (see calculation *). However, even when the engines are completely discharged (no not attached to anything whatsoever), they start missing steps away from my final goal. I'm only able to reach a radius of 0.2 "(vitesse de pointe de 1.25" / seconde). "

  My question; Is the system set up incorrectly or is my final goal unrealistic, given performance reductions inevitable due to software/hardware?

  I apologize for the naivety of this question, but if there is any information that you may provide which might shed some light on this problem, I would be very happy.

  Possible theories:

  Torque is decreased more at high speeds because of microstep

  A closed loop system would improve performance at high speed

  The VI 'Demo circle' is not the best method to create a circle

  The acceleration is the limiting factor, not speed

  * RADIUS = 0.47 "

  Maximum speed = (RADIUS * 2 * pi) * cos(2 * pi)

  Maximum speed = 2.9 "/ second"

  System:

  LabView v9.0

  PCI-7340

  open loop configuration

  MID-7604

  1 4 a per axis

  10 micro steps

  Linear actuator (form is attached)

  NEMA 17 ordered by motor (sold by ultra-motion).

  Maximum speed of 3.3 inches per second

  1. 2A voltage coil

  1.8º step angle

  Kind regards

  Nick

  Nick-

  I really wonder the max speed in the datasheet.  0,0833 "/ to 3.3" rev / s = about 40RPS (2400 RPM), which is extremely fast for a motor, especially at 24VDC.  Know exactly what engine is on the cylinder and go to www.applied-motion.com and you should be able to find curves of torque for that or a similar engine with various readers.  You will see that couple to 24VDC curves are not good.  In addition, ask Ultramotion if their speed/strength curve is theoretical, or tests have been conducted.

• Range Focus limiter on the 100mm Macro F2.8

  On an ILCA - 77M 2, just how to deal with this switch

  Of the operating instructions of the Macro Sony SAL100M28 100 mm f/2.8 lens:

  "To focus on subjects at close range..., update fixed anywhere near the object, and then set focus-range up to LIMITlimiter; the focus range is limited to the range of big point. Similarly, when shooting subjects at an extreme range, set thefocus anywhere near the object and then set the limiter of development-range up to LIMIT; the focal range is limited to the range Far-getting to the point. Set the limiter of development-range FULL to allow the range of focus. »

  The SAL100M28 is a macro lens, and as such, it has a long beach of possible focus distances. In addition, in order to get the sharpest image possible, it adjusts the focus more slowly than a conventional lens. This means that should naturally be for some time to focus on a subject. The focus range limiter gives you the ability to limit the movement of the lens at half of its normal range, which speeds up the process.

  Do not use it at all ever, but it can help to to focus on your topic before it moves.

• The limitation on the W520 with BIOS update?

  Hey everybody,

  My decision was very long, and whenever I get the motivation to upgrade to a W520, I always get worried about the forums. My main concern the limitation on the battery and the blocked processor clock. Since the last update of the BIOS, is it resolved? I can handle a small limitation on battery but 800 MHz is all just ridiculous. Before that I have finally let go of my money, buy the W520 in confidence that there is always these problems? I'll have to use this machine for at least 5 years, and if I have to start with these problems, I won't be a happy camper.

  Thank you.

  Hey, J,

  I think you get a view polarized the W520 on this forum. It is a solid and reliable machine. The limitation of problems have been resolved there are some revisions of the BIOS.

  Yes, it is not perfect in every way. However, it is a boon to the developer of this software. Yes, I use it to do the real work.

  Now that I've sung his praises, I'll do a 180 in saying that I would wait for the "W530" at this late stage of the game. This is probably only a few months at sea and can represent a significant improvement.

  BTW: If you want to get one, you will get a better deal by the way for one of the pre-built reseller like Amazon or Buy.com. It is much cheaper to do it and then upgrade only to have Lenovo customize it for you.

  For example, I went this route:

  Amazon W520

  I saw this as low as $1360 model. You can throw in a load of RAM for not much money.

  I wanted to talk, Buy.com stocks often this machine, and they have a 45 day return policy.

  There is my 2 cents.

  ZZ

• verification code 422 - what are the limits of the JVM?

  Hello

  I'm porting an application for BlackBerry 8900 using his emulator via the eclipse plugin. The application is large enough, it contains a lot of classes, some of them use a lot of static fields (mainly in the form: public final static String xxx = "yyy") and some here and there of the static methods.

  I ran into issues when I tried to run the application: 422 to xxxxx offset verification code.

  I found a few posts on the forum about this problem, but I have seen no clear solution. Someone has suggested that the source of the problem is the static methods/fields and proposed to refactor our source code to avoid using static fields. I followed technical debugging what he suggested, but it does not solve my problem. The error logged in the file '8900.bug' has changed of pointing on my course to point to the SDK classes ('Module 'net_rim_cldc_impl_softtoken' has verification errors"and"Module "net_rim_rimsecuridlib" contains errors of audit").

  I think that these errors are due to the limitations of black Berry JVM.

  I did a test program memory to display the amoungt of free memory (using "Runtime.getRuntime () .freeMemory ()" "") and it seems that it is not the limiting factor.

  (1) is anyone knows what is the verification code 422 and why this occurred on the modules of the SDK?

  (2) I tried to find the limits of the JAVA virtual machine specification somewhere in the documentation, but I can't find them anywhere. They emerge?

  (3) the BlackBerry 8900 JVM have a limitation on the number of fields/static methods that it can process?

  Right now, I'm stuck, any help would be greatly appreciated.

  I found that my midlet was causing a NullPointerException in the thread who load the classes and run their static initalizer. The JVM is hung not because of the static function, but the first load of the class that contains the static function.

• Limits of the hard drive?

  Hello! I'm new to the site, please bear with me. I have a question on 2 computers and 1 hard disk. Computer # 1: Presario S6300NX; originally with 512 MB of memory and 120 GB hard drive ATA parallel; a currently 1 GB of memory and installed a second hard drive 80 GB Parallel ATA. Computer #2: Presario SR1315CL; originally with 512 MB of memory and 160 GB hard drive ATA parallel; currently has 2 GB of memory and a 320 GB SATA hard drive installed. The hard drive in question is a Western Digital 500 GB SATA. Two of these computers would argue that hard drive? I can't find a coherent response to the question of the limits of the hard drive.

  AMM, since your computers were made in 2003/2004, the SATA ports will be first-generation (1.5Gbit / s).  I think that the hard drive will work, but it will not perform up to his capabilities (3 Gbps).

• Question on the limitation of the RAM

  I use Windows 7 x 86 ultimate (SP1) on a computer laptop 4 GB ram
  I am well aware of the limited memory posed by Microsoft, but why he only 2.16 GB usable memory?

  page
  http://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/Windows/desktop/aa366778%28V=vs.85%29.aspx#physical_memory_limits_windows_7
  shows that for 7 ultimate, the limit is 4 GB
  How is the limit for my laptop only 2.16?

  Edit:
  is there somehow I can ask Microsoft to remove this limitation? as quite the player, the more RAM is better for me, and this unusable GB 1.8 is quite disturbing

  I use Windows 7 x 86 ultimate (SP1) on a computer laptop 4 GB ram
  I am well aware of the limited memory posed by Microsoft, but why he only 2.16 GB usable memory?

  page
  http://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/Windows/desktop/aa366778%28V=vs.85%29.aspx#physical_memory_limits_windows_7
  shows that for 7 ultimate, the limit is 4 GB
  How is the limit for my laptop only 2.16?

  Edit:
  is there somehow I can ask Microsoft to remove this limitation? as quite the player, the more RAM is better for me, and this unusable GB 1.8 is quite disturbing

  As you know, the limitation is the 32-bit operating system you have chosen to run.  You want to use the memory better, get 64-bit Windows.

  Your material is to eat the rest of your memory with my guess it being likely to centre around a video camera, you have probably chosen to improve your gaming experience.

  Your solution, once again, is to set up a 64-bit operating system.  That's all.

  Do you have Windows 7 is pre-installed (OEM license) or did you buy this detail (the retail license)?

• Lineage tracing an SQL error: ORA-22813: value of the operand exceeds the limits of the system

  Hi all

  I started playing with OEMM and I get the following error when I try to 'Trace Data Impact' in an Oracle table. Here's what I do:

  • I created a template and collected a few schemas/tables:

  

  

  • Now when I try to "Trace Data Impact' on the table AP_DEF_STG, I get the following:

  

  

  

  I already tried to create a "Configuration" for her, I tried to text instead of graphics, but the error is the same. If I go to a view of Oracle and do a "track Data Lineage", I get the same error again.

  
  

  That someone was already been in this situation? This is the full error trace:

  
  

  ({"error": true, "errorMessage": "SQL error during the tracing of lineage: ORA-22813: value of the operand exceeds the limits of the system"})

  ', 'errorType': 'Line error', 'errorCodes': "[LNGTRC_E0016]".

  ","stackTrace":"Error Codes - [LNGTRC_E0016].

  Request - VizModelLineage

  Settings - showInternalObject [false] showNoType [true] showControlLinks [false] startingIds [17 #4723 #0] isBizUI [false] ObjectID [17 #1 #0] showSummaryView [true] collapseLevel [features] resetCache [fake] profile [] showMappingsAsNodes [true] skipCache [false] tracingDirection [3] tracingType [DataLineage] [ReportTree2202015-104855025] originalStartingObject cacheId [17 #4723 #0] viewType actionType [loadlineage] of viewId [ReportTree2202015-104855025] [ModelLineage]

  MITI.web.common.exceptions.LineageUIException: SQL for tracing line error: ORA-22813: value of the operand exceeds the limits of the system

  at MITI.web.common.service.facades.LineageFacadeImpl.getLineageGraph (LineageFacadeImpl.java:284)

  at MITI.flash.tabs.VizModelLineage.getLineageTree (VizModelLineage.java:429)

  at MITI.flash.tabs.VizModelLineage.buildLineageGraph (VizModelLineage.java:356)

  at MITI.flash.tabs.VizModelLineage.performAction (VizModelLineage.java:148)

  at MITI.server.servlets.FlashServlet.doPost (FlashServlet.java:156)

  at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:646)

  at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:727)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:303)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:208)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:220)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:122)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:170)

  at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:103)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:116)

  at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:421)

  at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:1070)

  to org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ AbstractConnectionHandler.process (AbstractProtocol.java:611)

  to org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$ SocketProcessor.run (JIoEndpoint.java:316)

  to java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$ Worker.runTask (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:895)

  to java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$ Worker.run (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:918)

  to org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$ WrappingRunnable.run (TaskThread.java:61)

  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)

  Caused by: MITI.server.services.lineage.LineageException: (LNGTRC_E0016) SQL error during the tracing of lineage: ORA-22813: value of the operand exceeds the limits of the system

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.database.LineageDataSource.handle (LineageDataSource.java:41)

  at MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource.handleSQLException (CommonDataSource.java:124)

  at MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource.executeTransaction (CommonDataSource.java:83)

  at MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource.executeStatement (CommonDataSource.java:54)

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.impl.LineageImpl.traceLineage (LineageImpl.java:554)

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.common.LineageTracer.traceLineage (LineageTracer.java:1078)

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.common.LineageTracer.traceDataLineage (LineageTracer.java:313)

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.common.LineageTracer.traceTechnicalData (LineageTracer.java:176)

  at MITI.web.common.service.facades.LineageFacadeImpl.getLineageGraph (LineageFacadeImpl.java:245)

  ... 21 more

  Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-22813: value of the operand exceeds the limits of the system

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.SQLStateMapping.newSQLException(SQLStateMapping.java:70)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.newSQLException(DatabaseError.java:133)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:206)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:455)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:413)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.receive(T4C8Oall.java:1035)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.doOall8(T4CPreparedStatement.java:194)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeForDescribe(T4CPreparedStatement.java:791)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeMaybeDescribe(T4CPreparedStatement.java:866)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1188)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeInternal(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3386)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.execute(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3487)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.execute(OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.java:1374)

  at MITI.util.database.Query.executeStatement (Query.java:45)

  at MITI.util.database.Statement.execute (Statement.java:66)

  to MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource$ 1.run(CommonDataSource.java:50)

  to MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource$ 1.run(CommonDataSource.java:47)

  at MITI.util.database.Transaction.execute (Transaction.java:92)

  at MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource.executeTransaction (CommonDataSource.java:80)

  ... more than 27

  Caused by:

  MITI.server.services.lineage.LineageException: (LNGTRC_E0016) SQL error during the tracing of lineage: ORA-22813: value of the operand exceeds the limits of the system

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.database.LineageDataSource.handle (LineageDataSource.java:41)

  at MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource.handleSQLException (CommonDataSource.java:124)

  at MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource.executeTransaction (CommonDataSource.java:83)

  at MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource.executeStatement (CommonDataSource.java:54)

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.impl.LineageImpl.traceLineage (LineageImpl.java:554)

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.common.LineageTracer.traceLineage (LineageTracer.java:1078)

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.common.LineageTracer.traceDataLineage (LineageTracer.java:313)

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.common.LineageTracer.traceTechnicalData (LineageTracer.java:176)

  at MITI.web.common.service.facades.LineageFacadeImpl.getLineageGraph (LineageFacadeImpl.java:245)

  at MITI.flash.tabs.VizModelLineage.getLineageTree (VizModelLineage.java:429)

  at MITI.flash.tabs.VizModelLineage.buildLineageGraph (VizModelLineage.java:356)

  at MITI.flash.tabs.VizModelLineage.performAction (VizModelLineage.java:148)

  at MITI.server.servlets.FlashServlet.doPost (FlashServlet.java:156)

  at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:646)

  at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:727)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:303)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:208)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:220)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:122)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:170)

  at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:103)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:116)

  at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:421)

  at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:1070)

  to org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ AbstractConnectionHandler.process (AbstractProtocol.java:611)

  to org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$ SocketProcessor.run (JIoEndpoint.java:316)

  to java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$ Worker.runTask (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:895)

  to java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$ Worker.run (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:918)

  to org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$ WrappingRunnable.run (TaskThread.java:61)

  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)

  Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-22813: value of the operand exceeds the limits of the system

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.SQLStateMapping.newSQLException(SQLStateMapping.java:70)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.newSQLException(DatabaseError.java:133)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:206)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:455)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:413)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.receive(T4C8Oall.java:1035)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.doOall8(T4CPreparedStatement.java:194)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeForDescribe(T4CPreparedStatement.java:791)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeMaybeDescribe(T4CPreparedStatement.java:866)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1188)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeInternal(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3386)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.execute(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3487)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.execute(OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.java:1374)

  at MITI.util.database.Query.executeStatement (Query.java:45)

  at MITI.util.database.Statement.execute (Statement.java:66)

  to MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource$ 1.run(CommonDataSource.java:50)

  to MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource$ 1.run(CommonDataSource.java:47)

  at MITI.util.database.Transaction.execute (Transaction.java:92)

  at MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource.executeTransaction (CommonDataSource.java:80)

  ... more than 27

  Caused by:

  java.sql.SQLException: ORA-22813: value of the operand exceeds the limits of the system

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.SQLStateMapping.newSQLException(SQLStateMapping.java:70)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.newSQLException(DatabaseError.java:133)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:206)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:455)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:413)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.receive(T4C8Oall.java:1035)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.doOall8(T4CPreparedStatement.java:194)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeForDescribe(T4CPreparedStatement.java:791)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeMaybeDescribe(T4CPreparedStatement.java:866)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1188)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeInternal(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3386)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.execute(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3487)

  at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.execute(OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.java:1374)

  at MITI.util.database.Query.executeStatement (Query.java:45)

  at MITI.util.database.Statement.execute (Statement.java:66)

  to MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource$ 1.run(CommonDataSource.java:50)

  to MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource$ 1.run(CommonDataSource.java:47)

  at MITI.util.database.Transaction.execute (Transaction.java:92)

  at MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource.executeTransaction (CommonDataSource.java:80)

  at MITI.util.database.CommonDataSource.executeStatement (CommonDataSource.java:54)

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.impl.LineageImpl.traceLineage (LineageImpl.java:554)

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.common.LineageTracer.traceLineage (LineageTracer.java:1078)

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.common.LineageTracer.traceDataLineage (LineageTracer.java:313)

  at MITI.server.services.lineage.common.LineageTracer.traceTechnicalData (LineageTracer.java:176)

  at MITI.web.common.service.facades.LineageFacadeImpl.getLineageGraph (LineageFacadeImpl.java:245)

  at MITI.flash.tabs.VizModelLineage.getLineageTree (VizModelLineage.java:429)

  at MITI.flash.tabs.VizModelLineage.buildLineageGraph (VizModelLineage.java:356)

  at MITI.flash.tabs.VizModelLineage.performAction (VizModelLineage.java:148)

  at MITI.server.servlets.FlashServlet.doPost (FlashServlet.java:156)

  at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:646)

  at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:727)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:303)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:208)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:220)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:122)

  at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:170)

  Oracle has published OEMM 12.2.1 and this error is gone! So if you are facing this problem in an older version, just go to the newest one.

• JUnit Test Suite Limitations on the number of test classes can be included in the suite

  I run JUnit tests on my ADF Model picardalice in an application. I'm getting an instance of a request through the class of the device module and it helps in my test classes. It was created using all the Test Suite of Business components in JDeveloper 12.1.3.

  I'm running a JUnit test suite and it has several test classes in its operation. It runs successfully some and others fail. If I run those who fail by themselves, they are successful. If I remove the test classes in the suite they work (even those who have failed when the test classes were listed as a result of tests).

  Here is my code for the test method.

  @Test

  public void testAccess() {}

  See ViewObject = fixture1.getApplicationModule () .findViewObject ("ProjEstimateDtlVO");

  assertNotNull (view);

  }

  the ViewObject perspective comes return null for the execution of the test suite during all test classes are ran. It's successful return if I run one test case. It's successful return if I remove test classes in the following before running the suite.

  There are 70 + test classes in the suite. Is there a limitation on the number of test classes that must be executed in a test suite? Is it because it is repeatedly using an instance of the application module? Is this other thing?

  Everyone ran through this?

  Thank you.

  The problem in my case was because in one of the test cases I was releasing the module of the application in the method of disassembly. Since the application module was created once again, when I ran after tests and he ran this test scenario, anything after this would fail due to no application being created module.

  Thanks, Timo

• Details on the Limitation of the API calls

  Hi all

  I'm newbie to Eloqua API and have a few questions about that.

  
  

  1. What is the maximum No. API calls limit for SOAP and REST (especially for large API) per day?

  2. when we say limit maximum API calls, is for the specific user or instance Eloqua together?

  for example, a single user can call the ends of the API for 2,000 times per day the maximum number (may be that other users can call the same on this day).

  OR special Eloqua instance is limited to 2000 calls is the maximum that API calls for a day (without distinction of different users).

  Please specify.

  Thank you

  Ashok.

  Hey Ashok,

  See this document for more information on limits for the bulk API API limits.

  Other APIs, the daily, the limits are based on Eloqua topping:

  Basic - 20 000

  Standard - 100 000

  Company - 500 000

  These limits are per instance.

  I hope this helps!

  T.J.

• Why im getting this error: "ORA-22813: value of the operand exceeds the limits of the system.

  HI EXPERTS...

  Please helpme to fix this...

  I have a database of oracle 11g, runnint on a Windows Server 2008:

  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production

  I have two tables:

  CREATE TABLE UTILS. SEG_ROLES

  (

  VARCHAR2 (12-BYTE) APPLICATION,

  ROL VARCHAR2 (12-BYTE),

  USERS VARCHAR2 (255 BYTE)

  )

  TOGETHER TO DEFINE

  Insert into SEG_ROLES (APPLICATION, ROL, USERS) Values ('MULTIPLAN', 'ADMIN', 'ADMIN');

  Insert into SEG_ROLES (APPLICATION, ROL, USERS) Values ("MULTICLIP", 'CAR01', 'PATY');

  Insert into SEG_ROLES (APPLICATION, ROL, USERS) Values ("MULTICLIP", "CAR02", "FABIOLA, ERIKA");

  Insert into SEG_ROLES (APPLICATION, ROL, USERS) Values ("MULTICLIP", "CON01', 'LUCY, PATY');

  Insert into SEG_ROLES (APPLICATION, ROL, USERS) Values ("MULTICLIP", 'CON02', 'VALERIA');

  COMMIT;

  CREATE TABLE UTILS. SEG_ACCESOS

  (

  VARCHAR2 (12-BYTE) APPLICATION,

  ADMROL VARCHAR2 (12-BYTE),

  VARCHAR2 (20 BYTE) MENU,

  OPCION VARCHAR2 (20 BYTE),

  TYPE VARCHAR2 (5 BYTE),

  OBJETO_MENU VARCHAR2 (40 BYTE),

  ACCESO VARCHAR2 (2 BYTE),

  ROLES_ACCESOS VARCHAR2 (255 BYTE)

  )

  TOGETHER TO DEFINE

  Insert into SEG_ACCESOS (APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION, TIPO, OBJETO_MENU, ACCESO, ROLES_ACCESOS)

  Values ("MULTICLIP", "ADMIN", "ROOMMA", NULL, am', 'm_coloca', the of ', 'CAR01, CAR02');

  Insert into SEG_ACCESOS (APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION, TIPO, OBJETO_MENU, ACCESO, ROLES_ACCESOS)

  Values ("MULTICLIP", "ADMIN", "PUT", "PREVALIDA", "SM", "sm_prevalida", the from ', 'CAR01, CAR02');

  Insert into SEG_ACCESOS (APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION, TIPO, OBJETO_MENU, ACCESO, ROLES_ACCESOS)

  Values ("MULTICLIP", "ADMIN", "PUT", "PRECOLOCA", "SM", "sm_preColocacion", the from ', 'CAR01, CAR02');

  Insert into SEG_ACCESOS (APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION, TIPO, OBJETO_MENU, ACCESO, ROLES_ACCESOS)

  Values ("MULTICLIP", 'ADMIN', 'LOVE', "COLOCACIÓN", "SM", "sm_colocacion", the from ', "CAR01");

  Insert into SEG_ACCESOS (APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION, TIPO, OBJETO_MENU, ACCESO, ROLES_ACCESOS)

  Values ("MULTICLIP", "ADMIN", "PUT", "REGCOLOCA", "SM", "sm_regcoloca", the from ', "CAR01");

  Insert into SEG_ACCESOS (APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION, TIPO, OBJETO_MENU, ACCESO, ROLES_ACCESOS)

  Values ("MULTICLIP", "ADMIN", "LDP", NULL, am', 'm_PLD', the of ', "CAR01, CAR02, CON01 CON02");

  Insert into SEG_ACCESOS (APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION, TIPO, OBJETO_MENU, ACCESO, ROLES_ACCESOS)

  Values ("MULTICLIP", "ADMIN", "LDP", "LN_CONSULTA", "SM", "sm_PLD_LNConsulta", the from ', 'CAR01, CAR02');

  Insert into SEG_ACCESOS (APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION, TIPO, OBJETO_MENU, ACCESO, ROLES_ACCESOS)

  Values ("MULTICLIP", "ADMIN", "LDP", "LN_BARRIDOMASIVO", "SM", "sm_PLD_LNBarridoMasivo", the from ', "CAR01");

  Insert into SEG_ACCESOS (APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION, TIPO, OBJETO_MENU, ACCESO, ROLES_ACCESOS)

  Values ("MULTICLIP", "ADMIN", "LDP", "REP_INICICLO", "SM", "sm_PLD_ReporIniciclo", the from ', 'CON01, CON02');

  Insert into SEG_ACCESOS (APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION, TIPO, OBJETO_MENU, ACCESO, ROLES_ACCESOS)

  Values ("MULTICLIP", "ADMIN", "LDP", "LN_BITACORA", "SM", "sm_PLD_LNBitacora", the from ', "CON01");

  COMMIT;

  - And this point of view:

  
  

  CREATE VIEW UTILS. VW_ROL_USER AS

  Select distinct APPLICATION, ROL, trim (column_value) USUARIO

  from (SELECT APPLICATION, ROL, USERS USER

  FROM UTILS. SEG_ROLES

  WHERE IT IS NOT NULL TO USERS

  ORDER BY APPLICATION, ROL

  ) t,.

  XMLTable ((' «' ||)) Replace (USER, ",", "",""). '"'))

  order by APPLICATION, ROL, trim (column_value)

  CREATE VIEW UTILS. VW_ACC_ROL AS

  Select distinct APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION, TIPO, OBJETO_MENU, ACCESO, trim (column_value) ROL

  (SELECT APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION, TIPO, OBJETO_MENU, ACCESO, ROLES_ACCESOS ROL

  FROM UTILS. SEG_ACCESOS

  WHERE ROLES_ACCESOS IS NOT NULL

  ORDER BY APPLICATION, ADMROL, MENU, OPTION

  ) t,.

  XMLTable ((' «' ||)) Replace (ROL, ",", "",""). '"'))

  MENU, TYPE, OPTION, APPLICATION control, trim (column_value)

  CREATE VIEW UTILS. VW_SEG_ACCESOS AS

  SELECT VACR. APPLICATION, VACR. MENU, VACR. TIPO, VACR. OPCION, VACR. OBJETO_MENU, VACR. ACCESO, VACR. ROL, VUSR. USUARIO

  FROM UTILS. VW_ACC_ROL VACR,

  UTILS. VW_ROL_USER VUSR

  WHERE VACR. ROL = VUSR. ROL

  ORDER OF VACR. APPLICATION, VACR. ROL, VACR. MENU, VUSR. USUARIO, VACR. TIPO, VACR. OPCION

  When I ask the last posting, it works fine:

  SELECT VSEG.* IN UTILS. VW_SEG_ACCESOS VSEG

  But when I add conditions:

  SELECT VSEG.* IN UTILS. VW_SEG_ACCESOS VSEG

  WHERE VSEG. APPLICATION = "MULTIPLAN.

  AND VSEG. USER = 'PATY '.

  It generates this error:

  ORA-22813: value of the operand is greater than the limits of the system

  Cause: The value of the object or the Collection was too big. The size of the value might have exceeded 30 k in a context of TYPE, or size may be too large for the available memory.

  Action: Choose a different value, and try the operation again.

  Why?

  Thanks in advance...

  Finally found a SOLUTION at: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14328621/oracle-10g-splitting-string-into-multiple-rows

  just change the way we create the view using the regexp_substr.

  CREATE VIEW UTILS. VW_ROL_USER AS

  SELECT distinct trim APPLICATION, ROL, (regexp_substr (USERS, ' [^,] +', 1, level)) USER

  FROM UTILS. SEG_ROLES t

  WHERE IT IS NOT NULL TO USERS

  CONNECTION BY instr (USERS, ',', 1, level - 1) > 0

  order by APPLICATION, ROL

  Thank you all

• This operation is limited by the administrator of the error when you run the command get-stats

  I have a script that use to collect monthly performance report - but after the upgrade of the CR, the script fails with the error below

  Get-Stat, this operation is limited by the administrator - "vpxd.stats.maxQueryMetrics". Contact your system administrator.

  I tried after the Ko -https://kb.vmware.com/kb/2107096 , but I don't see the webclient service performance

  Please notify

  As you use the API and not the Web Client, you need only modify the value in the advanced settings of vCenter.

  This can be done with

  Note that the value of-1 disables the limit altogether.

  The default value is 64.

  Get-AdvancedSetting - YourvCenter of the entity-name config.vpxd.stats.MaxQueryMetrics |

  Game-AdvancedSetting - value - 1

• Hello, im a student in England, student of architecture. I have the pack student for 12 months and I really need to know my limits with the use, (copyright licensing). I am allowed, except by using my home application to show works that i already have)

  Hello, im a student in England, student of architecture. I have the pack student for 12 months and I really need to know my limits with the use, (copyright licensing). I am allowed, except by using my home application to show works which I have already done (as portfolios) to architectural firms, I intend to request a placement to? also can I post my stuff (already did the work) on my blog or tumblr? I intend not to use for profit/money at all well (if I was I wouldn't ask you this lol). Thank you.

  Hi,

  Please see Licensing FAQ: where can I find the terms of membership and the terms of use?

  Hope that helps!

  Kind regards

  Sheena