logical formula interpreter

Similar Questions

• formula interpreter not activated

  A good reason why my formula interpreter is not enabled in dasyLab 12?  Window OS 8.1.

  Thanks for the help CJ, the directted file worked you me very well!

• Confusion about the use of the formula interpreter

  How can I rate a 4-bit input and output an integer value I need to map to a different value? I am to evaluate the following entries (4, 1 output):

  (((IN (0) AND IN (1)) AND (IN (2) AND IN (3)) = 13) <= we="" know="" that=""> 1111 b is 15decimal, but I need to translate the value 13 , so that it represents the index of a spreadsheet I'll be selecting with the sequencer.)

  I'm GOLD ' ing every possible combination of the 4 inputs and each combination should generate a value of 'special' I need to get out to represent the index that I need.

  The result of a comparison or logical operation (OR, AND, =, <> , etc.) is 0 (False, zero) or 1 (True, we).

  Change the formula for

  (IN (1), IN (0) AND IN (3) AND IN (2)) * 13

  In my limited testing, any value not zero entries will test to TRUE, if one is zero, then the output is zero, otherwise, the output is 13.

• Conditional formula using one of the two operations

  How to create a conditional formula where the results are a choice between two formulas based on the cell to two cells has a value greater than 0?  More specifically, I have to add value in a cell (in the column headed "added amount") to a cell in a column of the running totals if the value of this cell is greater than 0, or subtract the value of a different cell (in the column headed "amount withdrawn") in the same line, if the value of this cell is greater than 0.  Only one of the two will have a value in a given line.

  Hi George,.

  If you only have a value in a column, then you have even a logical formula. You can do this:

  

  A2 is an input value, it could be called "balance forward".

  A3 is filled down.

  Quinn

• Event-based proration formula group

  follwing text is mentioned in the user's guide for formula OracleFast:
  
  Write formulas of proration
  When the payroll running encounters an event (such as a change of category) that you have
  _defined as an event apportionment to the element being processed, it creates two execution results_
  for the element - one for the period of pay until the day before the event and the other of
  the date of the event for the end of the period. You define a formula to handle this
  proration for part of treatment
  
  
  Can someone tell why do two execution results? I don't need only one result!
  
  Thanks in advance,

  Hi user597685

  I was just referring to GET_ASSIGNMENT_STATUS formula you to create a custom function mentioning. So instead of using the seeded GET_ASSIGNMENT_STATUS formula function, create a custom formula similar to the above but referring to a different pl/sql function that must be something like below.

  function xx_get_Assignment_Status
  (p_assignment_id number
  p_effective_date IN Date) number IS back

  CURSOR csr_get_asg_status (p_assignment_id p_effective_date DATE NUMBER) IS
  SELECT decode(past.per_system_status,'ACTIVE_ASSIGN',1,'SUSP_ASSIGN',2,'TERM_ASSIGN',3,4)
  BY the ADP per_all_assignments_f.
  last per_assignment_status_types
  WHERE paaf.assignment_id = p_assignment_id
  AND p_effective_date BETWEEN paaf.effective_start_date AND paaf.effective_end_date
  AND paaf.assignment_status_type_id = past.assignment_status_type_id;

  number of l_return;
  BEGIN
  OPEN csr_get_asg_status (p_assignment_id, p_effective_date);
  SEEK csr_get_asg_status INTO l_status;
  CLOSE Csr_get_asg_status;

  RETURN l_status;
  END;

  This function returns 1 for the active state of the assignment, 2 suspended, completed 3 and 4 for the other. Amend accordingly the logical formula. This should solve your problem.

  Kind regards
  Sharath

• in (0) ^ 0.125

  In DasyLab11 formula interpreter with the out following equation ERR on digital counter, why?

  in (0) ^ 0.125

  However in (0) ^ 2 shows no error! (the entrance is from 0.1 to 5)

  It's just a guess, but maybe it's the digital counter associated. Try to increase the total number of digits in the DM of the icon "Options-> numbers" to 10 or more. If it works, then increase the number of decimal places for the channel and see if it works.

• Different signals controlled by relay... we want to show only the "chosen" signal

  Hello

  I have the following program:

  

  Explanation of this little program:

  I have 3 different signals recorded in variables:

  Variable 1: the tension that comes from the 'hands-on' + 1, (according to the formula interpreter).
  Variable 2: the tension that comes from the 'hands-on' + 2, (according to the formula interpreter).
  Variable 3: the tension that comes from the 'hands-on' + 3, (after the formula interpreter).

  Then these Variables are read and they can pass (enabled) randomly by switches, (this is just an example). In the actual program, only one relay can be activated, NOT 2 or 3 at the same time. (This program is only a part of a main program, control of the relays come from the other part of the main program).

  OK, now, we start the program: in the second 0 (departure), the 01 relay is activated (the other not); and, for example, in the second 10, 02 relay is activated (and relays 01 disabled). Pentecost, I want to view, or "do" the following: 4.5 V of the second 10, 0 to 9 and from the second, I want to get 5.5 V of the same line, (because this tension will be the output from my main program', is - it possible?)

  Thanks for your help,
  Arter

  Option 2 - based on standard modules DASYLab, but a lot of things todo.

  See the blue rectangle area of worksheet.

  
  The Module Aktion00 define any action of 'Dummy '. Important is that with the arrival of action that would increase the Global Variable 1.

  

  Initialization with departure of spreadsheet for the 1 Variable Global opportunity

  

  Global Variable 1 2.5 >-> then we reset to 0.

  

  

  Best regards

  MHa

• Fluctuation of the potentiometer signal

  I have a potentiometer of 10 k, I'm reading through Labview. I got the signal to work and come through and everything, but there is a problem with the signal. The potentiometer is connected to a dial and returns a signal of 0-5 based on where the dial turns. So there 4.5 volts at 06:00 the signal gives 2.5 volts and 09:00. The question comes with 12:00. The signal can freeze to 4,997 volts for about 1% of the rotation and jumps to 1.45% ~ 1 and then goes to zero.

  I'm trying to detect very fine when the dial begins to move and when it stops moving. I can't program a method to detect when the dial stops when the signal jumps around like he does. If you look at my program, I'm trying to set two criteria when the dial starts to move and when the dial stops. The problem is that jumps into the signal on the dial by midnight cause vi to prematurely close because the signal is erratic. Is there a way that I can change the signal of the device or anyone to think of a way of 100% can happen to these two criteria?

  Thank you

  Kevin

  His character has written:
  It's not a way I can just do a program that can logically interpreting the movements of the potentiometer? The value must go linearly from 0 to 5, and somehow use a VI or some form of logic to interpret if the value starts at 4.997 and then jumps to 1.4 instead of going to zero it must interpret this value of 1.4 as zero?

  This will do:

  

• Calculations of the rate of aggregation in essbase ASO SEEP cubes

  The question (limitation to ASO) we tried to find a solution/workaround. ON PBCS (Cloud)
  

  Details of the application:

  
  Application: type of ASO in cloud Oracle planning 11.1.2.3 (PBCS) application

  
  Dimension : Total 8 dimensions. Account to the dynamic hierarchy. Remaining 7 dimensional hierarchies Stored value. Only 2 dimensions have about 5000 members and others are relatively small and flat hierarchies.

  Description of the question of the requirement: We have a lot of calculations in the sketch that use amount = units * rates type of logic. The obligation is such that these calculation logic should apply only to the intersections of Level0 and then data resulted must roll up (down) to the respective parents across all dimensions. But when apply us this hierarchical logic / formula calculation to ASO, the logic(i.e.,amount=units*rate) of calculation is applied at all levels (not only the leaf level) of remaining dimensions. Here, rates are also numbers derived using the formula MDX.

  Some of the options explored so far:
  Option1: This is an expected behavior in ASO as all stored hierarcies are calculated first, then the dynamic hierarchies. So we tried to change the formula for each of the calculated members to explicitly summarize data at parent levels using algorithm as shown below.

  IF (Leaf Level combination)
  amount = units * rate
  Else / * for all levels parents * /.
  Use the function sum adding up the amounts between the children of the current members of dimension1, dimension2 and so on.
  End

  Result: Recovery works through the parents for a dimension. When the summary level members are selected in 2 or more dimensions, the recovery freezes.

  Option2: Change the type of hierarchy to group all the dimensions to "Dynamic" so that they calc after account (i.e. after amount = units * rate runs at intersections Level0).

  Result: Same as option 1. Although the aggregation works through one or 2 dimensions, it freezes when the summary level members are from many dimensions.

  Option3: ASO use custom Calc.
  We created a custom calc by fixing the POV Level0 members of any size and with the amount of formul = units * rate.

  Result: Calc never ends because the rate used is a dynamic calc with formula MDX (which is needed to roll forward rates for a specified period at all the following exercises).

  If you could get any help on this, it would be a great help.

  
  

  Thank you and best regards,

  Alex keny
  

  
  

  
  

  Your best bet is to use the allocation of the ASO, what difference does make. (one ton)

  There are a few messages blog out there that can help you meet this goal. (including mine), the trick is to create a member calculated with a NONEMPTYMEMBER in the formula

  Then it will be a member with an inside MDX formula

  NONEMPTYMEMBER units, rates

  Units * rates

  Now, make a copy of data (allocation) of this member-to-Member stored.

  http://www.orahyplabs.com/2015/02/block-creation-in-ASO.html

  http://camerons-blog-for-Essbase-hackers.blogspot.com/2014/08/calculation-Manager-BSO-planning-and.html

  Concerning

  Celvin Kattookaran

  PS I found NONEMPTYTUPLE does not and still used NONEMPTYMEMBER

• InDesign data merge true or false to create the list

  Hello

  I have an Excel spreadsheet of customer data that needs to be transformed into a several doc page impression.

  Each participant in an event gets a page each details listed. I can do this with a fusion of database.

  However, each client has chosen certain things that they are interested and the customer has created a matrix, as shown, where 1 means that they are interested in the subject in the heading of column and 0 means that they are not.

  Is there a way, a script or extension or something that will allow me to data merge these 1s and 0s in a simple list of subjects they have chosen.

  Any help greatly appreciated

  My next option is to try to do something with the Excel file but I am far from an expert in office.

  You must add one or more columns tot eh spreadsheet and use some kind of logical formula to fill based on zeros and ones, then merge this column.

• Oracle R OBI user custom graphics

  Hello

  I created Block anonymous in the database as below:

  Start

  sys.rqScriptCreate ('RandomRedDots3',

  "{additionnerAX

  field (1: n, rnorm (n), pch = 21)

  BG = 'red', cex = 2)

  }');

  end;

  /

  In the physical layer of OBI11.1.1.7, which creates a view like below:

  
  

  SELECT id, table image (rqTableEval (cursor (select VALUEOF (NQ_SESSION.))) NumRedDots) double n), NULL, 'PNG', 'RandomRedDots3'));

  
  

  Created 2 columns:

  ID with the data type DOUBLE

  IMAGE with LONGVARBINARY data type (32768)

  
  

  Created Session NumRedDots variable
  

  
  

  The joins necessary layer logic and changed the logical formula for an IMAGE column as below:

  Lookup (DENSE RandomRedDotsN.IMAGE, RandomRedDotsN.ID)

  
  

  Presentations in the presentation layer. Consistency check indicates no error.

  
  

  In the analysis, when I select those columns, get the error below:

  
  

  Error
  	View display error
  	ODBC driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW). Error details Error codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error occurred. [nQSError: 43113] The message returned by OBIS. [nQSError: 17001] Oracle error code: 911, message: ORA-00911: invalid character in the OIC call OCIStmtExecute. [nQSError: 17010] Prepare the SQL statement failed. (HY000) SQL published: SELECT 0 s_0, DESCRIPTOR_IDOF ("Prediction". "" "" RandomRedDotsN '. "" S_1 IMAGE"),"Prediction ". "" "" RandomRedDotsN '. "" IMAGE' s_2, SORTKEY ("Prediction". "" "" RandomRedDotsN '. "" S_3 IMAGE') 'FORECAST' FETCH FIRST 65001 LINES ONLY

  Can someone help me with this please?

  Thank you and best regards,

  Namrata

  Hi Sylvie,.

  Try to remove the colon semi at the end of the sql statement when you use it in RPD.

  The select block in the physical layer of RPD takes a SQL both and therefore does not need; as delimiter

  ~ Kedar

• Proration

  Hi all
  
  I have an obligation to pay compensation based on the mentioned accroding global values to grades. I need to pay the amount in proportion to the employees based on their eligibility.
  
  rank 1-2-100
  grade 3-4-200 etc...
  
  Now, if the grade of the official is changed in the middle of the month as for ex
  If the EMP grade changes 11 it must be paid
  the 1st to the 10th 100 and 200 from 11 to 30.
  
  How can I go about...
  
  I use under formula to achieve this objective
  
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  DEFAULT FOR ELIGIBLE_AMOUNT IS 0
  DEFAULT IS FOR PRORATE_START '' 01-JAN-1951 (DATE)
  DEFAULT IS FOR PRORATE_END '' 31-DEC-4712 (DATE)
  DEFAULT IS FOR PAY_PROC_PERIOD_END_DATE '' 31-DEC-4712 (DATE)
  DEFAULT IS FOR PAY_PROC_PERIOD_START_DATE '' 01-JAN-1951 (DATE)
  
  / * Local variables * /.
  
  DEFAULT for L_Amount IS 0
  DEFAULT for L_pay IS 0
  
  / * INPUT section * /.
  
  THE ENTRIES ARE ELIGIBLE_AMOUNT, PRORATE_START (DATE), PRORATE_END (DATE)
  
  
  / * NO proration * /.
  
  IF PRORATE_START = TO_DATE('01-JAN-1951','DD-MON-YYYY') AND PRORATE_END = TO_DATE('31-DEC-4712','DD-MON-YYYY') THEN
  L_pay = ELIGIBLE_AMOUNT
  
  / Proportional calculating * /.
  ON THE OTHER
  (
  L_Amount =(ELIGIBLE_AMOUNT*12)/365 / * gives the amount eligible for a day * /.
  L_pay = L_Amount * (DAYS_BETWEEN (PRORATE_END, PRORATE_START) + 1).
  )
  RETURN L_pay
  
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  My doubt is how the beginning of proration and the end date will be affected
  and what must be the condition in case of groups...
  
  Thanks in advance,
  SRS.

  OK it still applies, even if your logical formula must have something in place as:

  IF ASG_GRADE = "GRADE1" OR ASG_GRADE = "GRADE2" THEN
  (value = )
  ELSE IF etc.

  Personally, I would be inclined to do as a table defined by the user, then make a GET_TABLE_VALUE by passing in the rank (instead of an overall value, I mean)

  If you have this kind of logic, the DB corresponding quality should match what is appropriate to , so as long you do your daily val * no of days type calculation, then you should properly be pro-rating

  Clive

• How to divide the column Date OBIEE

  Hello
  We have the name of the date column: To_Date and the format is DD/MM/YY hh.
  How to divide the date in YEARS, MONTHS, DAY as new columns.
  kindly help on that.
  
  
  Kind regards.
  CHR
  
  Published by: 867932 on November 23, 2011 22:18

  Hi user,

  All 3 functions can be written in RPD too. MDB layer, duplicate the date column-> the mapping tab to column of Goto-> expression-> functions Builder Select-> calendar Date functions / hour-> select DayofMOnth function. The column of your logic formula will look like,

  DayofMonth (YourDateColumn)

  Rgds,
  DpKa

• Problem in making a chart with the time Dimension

  Hello experts! I have a problem with a specific chart.
  
  I have a quick TIME in my dashboard page: format: 09/07/2010
  
  Now I have to make a graph in LINE with two lines (actual, previous) and X axis is a week that belongs to this day in my message of General solicitation.
  
  My problem is that I see in my dashboard page two weeks: week 2009 containing a line (last year) and week 2010 which has another line (actual year).
  
  I would like to see a week with two lines together
  
  I have two measures in my report (actual and previous measure-> logical formula with AGO of my oracle administration)
  
  
  Any solution?
  
  Thank you!!
  
  PD: Obiee 11.1.1.5

  N ° but a 1 looks cool... I am sure that your customer will like this :)

  You can close this now... Buddy nice discussion. Try to connect on LinkedIn.

• Application of the rules to Instances of entity in a sequence (multiple calls necessary?)

  Hello
  
  In my OPA team, we have a situation in which it would be useful to be able to run a series of calculations on a set of instances sequentially. We wonder if there is an acceptable method for this in a single call to a modules, because the OPA does not allow a loop or a sequential processing of data in a way that seems obvious.
  
  Context:
  Consider a situation involving a computation that can be performed on a single Bill, but we have a series of bills to deal with. For example, let's say that there are a certain amount of a deduction or "co-payments" that must be subtracted from the large bills, but is deducted in greater quantity of invoices received earlier (rather than be distributed also among them) and then will deplete fairly once was subtracted in all. In this case, it is not sufficient to use a statement of the type «for each of the Bills...» "because the conditions for the calculation have to change with each invoice. This seems to require the ability to browse an ordered list, but we do not know if something like this is possible (without violating an axiom or advised).
  
  Ideas:
  The best idea we could come to would be to use a time stamp to identify the Bill earlier as a starting point and then use the function of 'unknown' to force the rules to calculate the deduction for 'other' more former Bill in sequence. The current solution will be to call several times modules by an external script that loops through the Bills.
  
  To sum up, we wonder whether there is an acceptable approach to apply a set of rules to an entity instance before to apply the same rules to others, without requiring multiple calls for modules.
  
  Thank you!
  -Patrick
  
  Published by: Patrick guess on July 6, 2011 19:11

  You started down the right path. To quickly answer questions, there is no need for multiple calls to the basis of rules, no for ranking explicit rules or data.

  The challenge when using unordered rules / systems of determinations is out procedural thinking (that loops or sequencing data explicit is required). The solution is by expressing the declarative logic equivalent (which requires no sequence with the right answer). In this case, consider the calculation from the perspective of one invoice at a time and write the rules that express properly how much to pay, what is the quota, etc. For the batch processing where running tallies are needed, there is something practical for use in the rule based systems - conclude the subtotal per each item being counted (for example, remaining annual quota through each invoice). This approach allows the declarative rules which "defined" the method calculate the score by a Bill, so that the following invoices can use the score of previous bills. Unfortunately, the description abstract approach always sounds more confused, so here is an example of rule of pseudocode that can communicate the key elements of the approach...

  Assume:
  Bills have numbers (or dates/hours) which can be used to conclude an absolute order for all bills (we will use Bill in ordering them in this example)
  Remaining annual quota of the person is the initial amount of copay remaining before the current batch of invoices is treated
  Each invoice must include a co-payment of $50 (for simplicity, although this could be concluded by rules and vary based on the services provided, etc.)
  Assume all bills are more than the share (again to simplify this example, this could be dealt with in the rules of both conditions)
  The main objectives of the basis of rules are to determine the share of each invoice and the balance sheet of the share of the person (i.e. copay they may still have to pay this year) after treats a batch of invoices.

  Pseudo rules to get the general concept:

  Set the order in which the bills need to be addressed...
  -The Bill (prior Bill) is a member of previous invoices of the invoice if the s prior invoice ID< the="" invoice's="">
  -The Bill (later Bill) is a member of the subsequent invoices of the invoice if the invoice later s ID > ID of the invoice
  -The Bill (Bill immediately preceding) is a member of if immediately before invoice
  the immediately previous invoice is a member, if the prior Bill of Bill AND
  the number of previous invoices of the invoice with ID > ID of the invoice immediately before = 0

  To conclude the first remaining share of each invoice... put them in a table of rules, so they can conclude the same attribute but use different logical formulas
  -Initial remaining Copay of the invoice = remaining share of the person if the number of the invoice is immediately previous bills is 0 (i.e. the first Bill in the batch)
  -Initial remaining Copay of the invoice = share of remaining final invoice of the immediately previous invoice (i.e. each ' initial rest copay "is the same that the invoice immediately before the 'final remaining copay)

  A table is used to define how much share for each invoice - two possible scenarios...
  -Share of the invoice = $50 if the original invoice remaining share > = $50
  -Share of the Bill remaining share = original invoice if the original invoice remaining quota<>

  A rule to determine the final remaining share of each invoice (i.e. after subtracting the share upward through this invoice of the annual overall amount of the person)
  -Copay remaining final invoice = remaining share original of the invoice - share of the Bill

  A rule to determine the person remains final share (i.e. After all invoices in this batch have been processed)
  -remaining share final person = final remaining share of the Bill if later the invoice s County bills = 0 (i.e. the final copay remaining of the 'last' Bill in the batch)

  Note that some attributes and relationships above are not absolutely necessary (i.e., it is not necessary to postpone the two remaining original co-pay and determine a final remaining share by invoice, but it retains the logic of each a little more simple rule).

  Hope that helps...