Lost the remote TCP/IP connection through NOR-MAX

"" Hi, I try remotely LeCroy WaveRunner 104Xi oscilloscope through "resources VISA TCP/IP" option in Control Panel OR MAX, but the VISA session is lost (0xBFFF00A6) right after I viWrite the '* IDN?" order several times.

Here's my full configuration process:
1. install the Passport VISA LeCroyVICPPassportInstaller_1.0.8.exe , LeCroy oscilloscope

2. setting of the session to follow the instructions (as per joint, LAB_WM827.pdf)

[by the way, I'm not able to configure the session as "VCIP:'type', I only be able to configure the session asTCPIP0:: 1861:OCKET" ""]
   
    TCP/IP resources VISA-> Create TCP/IP new resource...-> Raw Socket
   
Set the IP address: 137.57.96.8 (this IP address is successful to be ping by PC and this address is of course belong to the 104Xi WaveRunner oscilloscope)
Set the port number: 1861

3. then, there will be a new resource under "resources VISA TCP/IP". Select this option and 'VISA Open Session'. A dialog box will be retractable to the communication of the instrument.

4. go to the tab "viSetAttribute", the value VI_ATTR_TCP_KEEPALIVE to VI_TRUE, VI_ATTR_TMO_VALUE the value of 15000.

* NOR-MAX Version: 3.1.1.3004
* Connection: The ethernet cable is used through the server (No 1 to 1 connection) of the company,

"After all this, I send '* IDN? \n"(dans l'onglet viWrite ), it returns the value 0 (which means no error occur) and return 6 counts. " So I try to read a buffer (in the viRead tab), but it send me error timeout (VI_ERROR_TMO). After that, I erase the buffer in viClear. Then, I repeat same steps, this time he (viRead) return me connection lost error (VI_ERROR_CONN_LOST).

This situation is repeated every time that I reopen it new session. In the meantime, I also doubt that the viWrite did send the command to the oscilloscope or not. The oscilloscope was no response after that I have send "ASET" (WaveRunner 104Xi order for autosetup oscilloscope) through the viWrite tab.

I am out of ideas now.

What's my configuration OR-MAX problem? or hardware problem? or a server problem?

Please advice... need help badly.

Thanks in advance.

Hi wcsoh,

Alan and LeCroy Support here...

Use the type of connection (LXI).  The problem is that when you use the connection TCP/IP (ACIP) type, you cannot configure the WaveRunner 104MXi as a resource of VISA's TCP/IP in MAX.   Note that MAX is not 'hip' to recognize any instrument type TCPIP, including extended via ACIP LeCroy.  To use LXI, go to utilities > utility configuration... and then to the 'Remote' tab, where you will find the button on the left side of the screen of config to use 'LXI '.  If you don't see this button, you will probably need to update your firmware.

With the type of connection (LXI), you can automatically find the scope through MAX, enter this amount as a VISA TCP/IP resource and configure an alias as well...  You can also point your web browser to the IP address of the bezel, and you will see a status page with information, including the name VISA always useful resource to use when you configure the scope in MAX.  (Note, however, there is no need to use MAX at all when the connections of VISA to LeCroy oscillloscopes!)

Here is a link to an application note written by me which deals with the LXI interface, including information about the configuration of MAX to show scope: http://www.lecroy.com/tm/library/AppNotes/LXI/LXI_Interfacing_AppNote.pdf

Do not hesitate to contact me for any question!

Best regards

Alan Blankman

Tags: NI Hardware

Similar Questions

  • How to change the remote ip address connection svs - vCenter was reloctated

    We just finished relocating our vCenter from one subnet to another, the IP address has changed and now we cannot add vmware port groups in the vNetwork Distributed Switch.

    When we tried to add the port profile the warning was "warning: operation successful locally but the update failed on the vCenter server.» Check if you are connected to vCenter Server. "We have checked the configuration on the 1010V link and found the culprit, the svs to vCenter connection had the old remote ip address.

    What is the preferred method to change it without destroying the config?

    Thanks in advance.

    How to do is the following:

    n1000v (config) # svs connection vcenter

    n1000v(config-SVS-conn) # no connection

    # 1.1.1.1 remote ip address n1000v(config-SVS-conn)

    n1000v(config-SVS-conn) # connect

    Essentially to turn off, change the IP address and then reactivate the connection.

  • cRIO 9082 - cannot connect through NI MAX/LV

    Hi all

    I am writing my bachelor on the dynamic memory and the vibration tests.

    The project I design an experimental platform used to excite some mechanical components.

    We need several sensors (MON, accelerometers, DC motors etc.), we use a cRIO 9082.

    However, when I want to connect to the cRIO I can't OR Max, that is I can't set it up. I can see it only in the browser OR (see photo).

    I am connected directly to the cRIO via a crossover cable and IPv4 is set to automatically assign the IP address.

    Any ideas of how I properly connect to the cRIO 9082.

    I'm new on the job with this kind of electronic products, since I am majoring in mechanical engineering - so please keep the explanations as simple as possible ;-)

    If you want more details, please let me know.

    Thanks in advance.

    JZaulich.

    Hi Alex,

    Thank you very much for your answer.

    I had to disable the Windows Firewall as well as the AVG firewall, that did the trick.

    Apparently Windows does not allow this type of connection.

    After you turn off the firewall, I added the cRIO using the IP address, and it seems to work very well.

    Thanks again.

    Best regards

    Jakob Zaulich

  • Siri new Apple TV remote will work on the old Apple TV (I lost the original remote control).

    The new remote Siri will work with older versions of the Apple TV. I lost the remote of my older generation 2nd Apple TV and wondered if the new remote would work or I have to buy an older remote.

    N ° you need remote rained money. If you have all the iOS devices there as a remote for those application.

    TT2

  • How to set up the MySQL database to connect from another computer?

    Hello

    I have a huge problem with that.

    What I want to do is:

    I want to create a system (in LabWindows/CVI) this will (among others) allow users to send simple messages to each other. So I want to create a MySQL database , which will be based on a server. Other computers running the system then is able to remotely connect to this database and read a certain table to see if they have new messages. I want that the client computer to connect through the LAN to the database on the server.

    But how can I do this?

    1. How to create a database that can be connected through the LAN?

    2. How my connection string should look like not on the client computer?

    3. What configurations on the client and server computers can I do?

    Any help is appreciated, and if you could suggest how can I do to reach my goal. I'm a very competent programmer, but HATE those network things.

    Thank you

    Umer

    Nothing really associated with LabWindows. Try http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/tutorial.html for the database installed and running on a server.

  • Establishment of a VISA for a TCP/IP connection

    I'm writing a LabVIEW program that will allow me to recover data in my LeCroy Wavejet 354 and display them in a LabVIEW interface.  I set ACIP of LeCroy passport.  I have a problem ping from the unit so I know that my ethernet to the computer connection is good.  We know do not know how I can use VISA to make the connection for TCP/IP connections. In MAX, the function of remote systems will not detect the IP address of the bezel-o.  I also tried to create a new device under devices and interfaces in MAX and after "create new", he gave me no option to create anything.   You have an example VI that can help me see how VISA can be used to establish this connection or know another way I could get this to work?  Thanks for the help.

    Remote systems is not the right way to add Ethernet instrument. Right click on the device and Interfaces and then left or do a right click on the Create New..., must display the screen below. You want to select VISA TCP/IP resource

  • The connection to the remote host has been lost.

    Seriously, almost every time I save a file and try to download it I get this error:

    The connection to the remote host has been lost. Click Refresh to reconnect.

    So I have to start again to download the file again... but no, I get this error again... until about 7 times then it will finally through. After that happening by once I have on a window of 2 minutes where I can download files without errors... then the cycle continues.

    This is driving me CRAZY! It happened for about 2 weeks. I have not recently changed all the server info. I used to download files on the same server from dreamweaver all the time with ease. My partner with the same configuration works always with ease. So why am I having so much trouble?

    I often have to troubleshoot PHP where I upload to the server to run it to see if it works, and I could have several times to download a file in the few minutes that becomes incredibly tedious task with this ongoing issue.

    Someone please help.

    Thank you!

    P.S. I'm using CS3.

    Ah ha! I finally got to work properly!

    Your site-> Site-> Remote Info Manager, try to check the passive FTP box and see if it works.

  • I lost the connection to Windows 2003 server and through the connector.

    I lost the connection to Windows 2003 server and through the connector.

    original title: WHS connector has stopped working.

    Hi Mjopritchard,

    The question you have posted is related to Windows Home server and would be better suited to the Windows Home server community.
    Please visit the following link to find a community that will support what ask you:

    Support for Windows Home Server

  • Check the connections TCP & UDP host through ACL

    Hello!

    I use ACL to control TCP UDP & connections pass through my router (C805 & C2500). I plan to control of the host, but after I have created a new ACL that and add it on IP Access-Group of my Serial interface, the acl that I add before who is used to control the connections TCP & UDP is removed because of an ACL. How can I handle this?

    What you have is a standard access list, which would block anything with the source 127.0.0.1 address and an access list more extended negates several types of traffic.

    To combine I would rewrite the access list standard as a broader access list:

    access-list 100 deny ip 127.0.0.1 host everything

    who deny packets whose source 127.0.0.1 address.

    I would put rewriting stated as first statement in the new list access followed by others which would give you this:

    Note 100 access list refuse the specific host

    access-list 100 deny ip 127.0.0.1 host everything

    Access-list 100 remark block number TCP and UDP ports

    access list 100 permit tcp any any eq www

    access-list 100 permit tcp a whole Workbench

    access-list 100 tcp refuse any any eq 135

    access-list 100 tcp refuse any any eq 445

    access-list 100 tcp refuse any any eq 593

    access-list 100 deny udp any any eq 135

    access-list 100 deny udp any any eq tftp

    access-list 100 deny udp any any eq netbios-ns

    access ip-list 100 permit a whole

    That should do it.

    HTH

    Rick

  • CS4 'the connection to the remote host was lost.

    Suddenly, I get the error message (CS4) when I try to connect to remote hosts: "the connection to the remote host has been lost. Click Refresh to reconnect. "It is impossible to connect to a remote host.

    This happens for all my sites on remote servers in different countries, so it must be a problem of DW. Please advice.

    Have you tried to use passive mode:

    Definition of site > advanced > click on the passive FTP box and see if it works.

    --

    Nadia

    Adobe Community Expert: Dreamweaver

    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    Unique templates CSS | Tutorials | SEO articles

    http://www.DreamweaverResources.com

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Web Design & development

    http://www.perrelink.com.au

    http://Twitter.com/nadiap

  • I have a desktop PC with windows XP (Professional) on this subject, but I can't access to the pc through the remote desktop tool.

    Remote Desktop does not work

    Hello

    I have a desktop PC with windows XP (Professional) on this subject, but I can't access to the pc through the remote desktop tool. I already checked several options, but nothing seems to work. I don't even get an error message, the window just those which blinks and nothing happens...

    Could you please help?

    This is wat I already checked:

    -"allow users to connect remotely...". ' is running

    -TCP/IP listening on port 3389

    -Terminal services are started

    -J' tried connecting to Windows 7 and Windows XP, nothing works

    -Ping the ip address of the client PC works fine

    If you have any other ideas, I would be very gratefull!

    Thanks to advandce

    You will probably need to open port 3389 on your router so that it maps on the computer that is tuned to the connections of the DRC. It seems that you did all the other steps, but your router can prevent the connection to go anywhere. Here's a detailed guide to configure your router for DRC that can provide some guidance.

  • "Error 720: a connection to the remote computer could not be established.

    Earlier, it was working fine. One day it stopped working. I don't write my windows key and the serial number of HP for reasons of confidentiality, but it is authentic.

    I use Windows 7 Home Premium on my laptop HP bought 4 months ago. While trying to connect to internet through my USB data card (I use Auntie Photon +) I get an error message "error 720: a connection to the remote computer could not be established. When I connect the same device to another laptop, it works fine. The USB card company suggests that it is a matter of TCP/IP and I need my OS resintall. I don't have any CD of windows with my HP laptop. I tried to restore my machine, but that did not help. Please help me.

    Hello

    Do the methods and check if this solves the problem.

    Method 1: Try to run the network troubleshooter, check the link for more information on the same.

    Using the troubleshooter from network in Windows 7

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/using-the-network-troubleshooter-in-Windows-7

    Method2: You can try the steps outlined in the article and check if this gives a probable solution.

    "Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage" error when you view a Web site in Internet Explorer

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/956196

    Reset Internet Explorer WARNING:
    Please note that reset the settings of Internet Explorer running resets all of the settings defined by the user, including those established by the installed extensions, toolbars and other add-ons for IE by default. This includes all the security, privacy and settings area. Also this will erase browsing history, delete all temporary Internet, cookies, form data files and especially all the passwords.

    I hope this helps.

  • IPSec on the Client TCP connections via USB

    We have a problem (and I noticed that several other people here are as well) to our users of broadband remote is not not able to connect. We just recently started getting complaints from users at home XP they were getting errors while trying to connect to the hub.

    To begin troubleshooting we moved our hub 3015 outside our firewall temporarily. Users were still unable to connect. After some additional troubleshooting, we were able to successfully reproduce this problem by simply changing the VPN client to users of IPsec over TCP to IPsec over UDP.

    Then, we tried to identify why she passed to some customers, but not all. In the end, the only thing we could find really different was that customers who have a USB port to connect to the network instead of a correct Ethernet port cannot connect via IPSec over TCP. We have tested and verified on several operating systems, including Windows 2000, XP Home and XP PRO. We have also tested and verified with multiple VPN Clients including 3.5.1 and 3.6.3b.

    The end result is that all case users who use a type USB connection cannot connect via IPSec over TCP. All users who connect through a correct Ethernet adapter are able to connect via another method.

    Our problem is that we cannot run UDP connections behind our firewall without conversion on NAT. We send a client preconfigured to our users which forces to use tcp port udp by default 10000 10000 verses. We do this for several reasons, but the most important of them is our firewall will not redirect sessions IPSec UDP, IPSec TCP sessions only.

    Leaving the VPN concentrator outside the firewall and exposed is not an option. So, I find myself with say to all my users USB that is the only way that they can connect to install an Ethernet card, which ultimately is not really much of an option considering expenditure and technical knowledge necessary to pull it off the coast with hundreds of individuals it just will not fly.

    So, this brings me to this forum. Before I open a TAC case I hear experts to try to determine as closely as possible, if this is a problem of Microsoft or Cisco VPN client. I have my suspicions that this is owned by Microsoft, but I can't prove anything yet. Does anyone else have an idea on this? Please, I invite everyone to test this out and let us know what you find. If you would like more details on the methodology please let me know and I would be happy to provide it. I think it is potentially a huge problem only by the number of complaints I've seen in this forum. My supervisor thinks I smoking something when I try to explain this to him. All he can say is "if it was really a problem, more people would certainly also, and you would have heard about it now, it must be in your configuration." GO FIX"(does all this sound familiar?)

    I appreciate all of the comments that everyone is willing to give. I think that if we as a community get together on this we can find a solution.

    Thanks for your time!

    It is a bug, use the bugtool kit to see bug CSCdv00229.

  • Resolved - getting error when connecting to the remote database to the host

    Hello

    I try to connect to the remote form of database host and get error. Can someone please help.

    I've seen a few threads about similar issues, but I am not able to solve this problem.

    I use Oracle Apps 12.2.0, Linux 5.1, Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit, using SQL Developer to connect.

    I am able to connect using SQL Developer in distance and using the same credentials in SQL Developer host, but in error

    Status: Failure-Test failed: IO Error: Connection reset

    The host

    I am able to ping remote, but cannot tnsping

    The tnsping error-

    Use settings files:

    C:\app\oracle\product\12.1.0\dbhome_2\NETWORK\ADMIN\sqlnet.ora

    EZCONNECT adapter used to resolve the alias

    Try to contact (DESCRIPTION = (CONNECT_DATA = (SERVICE_NAME =)) (ADDRESS = (PROTO

    (COL = TCP)(HOST=192.168.1.102) (PORT = 1521)))

    AMT-12547: TNS: lost contact

    Here are more details

    I have added the following in the TNSNAMES file. ORA file

    SCREW =

    (DESCRIPTION =

    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP) (HOST = 192.168.1.102)(Port= 1521))

    (CONNECT_DATA =

    (SERVER = DEDICATED)

    (SERVICE_NAME = SCREW)

    )

    )

    I have added the following in the listener

    LISTENER =

    (DESCRIPTION_LIST =

    (DESCRIPTION =

    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = CIP)(KEY = EXTPROC1521))

    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP) (HOST = 192.168.1.102)(PORT = 1521))

    )

    )

    Finally - the firewall is disabled in Linux Machine

    Can you ping the server IP (or nomhote.nomdomaine) address of the client machine?

    What is the error you get when you issue "tnsping SCREWS" of the client machine?

    You have added the following entry to your client's tnsnames.ora file?

    +++++++++++++++++++++

    SCREW =

    (DESCRIPTION =

    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP) (HOST = 192.168.1.102)(Port= 1521))

    (CONNECT_DATA =

    (SERVER = DEDICATED)

    (SERVICE_NAME = SCREW)

    )

    )

    +++++++++++++++++++++

    Can you reproduce the problem with sqlplus? If so, please see (11.5.10 news: run SQL * Net access for guests (Doc ID 291897.1)).

    If the problem with SQL Developer only, please see (SQLDeveloper receives ' java.sql.SQLRecoverableException: IO Error: Connection reset "and ORA - 609 database alert (Doc ID 1483287.1)).

    Thank you

    Hussein

  • Very slow queries when connecting through the listener in Oracle 10.2.0.4

    Hello

    I have a database 10g with a small table (2 columns, 9 lines).

    When I connect to the db through the listener (sqlplus system/manager@SID) and run this query: select * table, the run time is approximately 500ms

    When I connect to the db, giving the ORACLE_SID SID (export ORACLE_SID = SID; sqlplus system/manager) and run the same query, it is 10 x faster...

    The listener is: TNSLSNR for Solaris: release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    Is the database: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production 64-bit

    Any ideas?

    Thank you... (I'm a newbie in oracle and English... so I apologize in advance)

    Edited by: user1248176 APR 12. 2010 22:50

    steve80lyon wrote:
    If this problem a network, then please note that I run the client and the server db on the same machine... a sun fire v240 and I'm alone on this server.

    I also tried it on another computer, run the client on the same machine as the server... It's the same question.

    I am lost... I ran the client that connects to a Database 9i (the same structure but the data of the elder) I have a time to ' correct '...

    Edited by: steve80lyon Apr 13. 2010 08:11

    The request may not be leaving the machine, but it is still going through the network TCP stack. You have the gun of smoking showing exactly where the extra time is coming. Should it take that long? I don't know, but it seems to me that calculation adds up correctly to account for the difference between the tcp protocol and legacy connections.

Maybe you are looking for