LOW 5.0 API search Exchange storage group

Similar Questions

• Unit - mailbox moved to the new storage group is not available

  Hello

  I have a 4.0 (4) unit UM with a message from Exchange 2003 offbox store. During the initial installation, only the first storage group on the mail server was present and mailboxes of the users are hosted here.

  Recently, a new storage group was created on the mail server and a mailbox has been moved from the first group of storage to the new storage group. The Subscriber is able to receive voice messages via e-mail, however his MWI does not illuminate. When it tries to connect to retrieve messages on his phone, the unit said "your messages are not available now.

  I am able to create or import users that are hosted in the new storage group, but I'm having the same symptoms. Is it necessary to rerun the configuration of message store wizard?

  Thanks in advance.

  Have you run Assistant permission for the new Bank of mailboxes?

  The other thing to do is to restart the AvMsgStoreMonitor service; But wait after hours. A reboot will do the same.

• CX3-20: host in several storage groups?

  Hi all

  What is the trick? I have all the storage groups created on our SAN access to our server VCB (Virtual Consolidated Backup of VMware).

  The problem is that our Clarion EMC Cx3-20 allow us only to add a host to a storage group.

  If I want to connect the VCB server to a different storage group, I get a prompt saying (in Navisphere):
  AMS - back.corp.com: this host is already connected to a different storage group. Connection to the current storage group will be be disconnected from the other storage group. This will cause the host unable to access the LUNS that are in the other storage group.

  VCB server must see all LUNS, can advise you?
  Thank you

  
  

• Orientation of storage group

  Hi all

  We are expanding our storage environment and wanted some advice on setting up our group/pools.

  We currently consisting of 12 TB PS4000E storage group, it is used as mass storage for files and archiving of mail servers. All volumes are in the default storage pool.

  We bought a 24 CT PS4100E and a 14 TB PS6100X to add to this group. The idea is to migrate existing data from Vault/e-mail on the server of the PS4000E file, so it can be removed from the Group and used elsewhere in the company.

  In scenario 1 we add two devices in the Group and separate storage pools and migrating volumes from the storage pool by default for the pool containing the PS4100E. Then remove the PS4000E of the group.

  In scenario 2 we have the PS4100E and the PS6100X in the same pool of storage and migrate the data in the same way. The group can then distribute the data as seems it.

  In the future we will migrate VM storage over another group, containing a PS5000.

  What are the considerations of raid level and pool for these scenarios? RAID5 has been recommended for both of the new features, but can they coexist in the same pool and work well with the same level of raid?

  Thanks in advance.

  Jim

  Yes, you can run different RAID levels in the same pool and through different speeds with him when to use the latest version of the firmware (5.x and v6.x).

  You can add new members in any combination you like (an a R10 two R10 or the two R6, or alone as a R6).  APLB (Automatic Performance Load Balancing) will examine various aspects of i/o, disk speed, type, RAID and determine the best placement for the slices of volume and move the data according to the needs (in the background) to provide the best performance.

  Just note that because the SAS bays generally have more space, volumes have generally several sections on the largest capacity table.

  -joe

• Storage groups

  Hello

  At the start of SAN in UCS, what is the best practice when creating the storage groups in the drive Bay?

  For example, VMware: is it best practice to have a storage group for each ESXi and add its own ESXi Boot LUN (id = 0) and the necessary VM LUN data store?

  Other environments (Linnux, Windows, Hyoer-V) have something special in these terms to support?

  Thank you

  It's a security issue.  Because the LUN ID can be changed easily on the host computer, you could continuously clobber the LUN hurt if your server administrator has incorrectly changed LUN ID.  In addition, once a host is started, it will be able to see & access each LUNS in the storage group independently LUN ID.  The importance of the impacts host LUN ID matches only a host trying to start SAN.

  The two main forms of security applied to the storage is zoning and masking.

  Zoning - on storage switch, acts as an ACL restricting the scope of what can see the members of the zone.  An area will normally contain only a single host and target WWN.  * Who I can see *.

  Masking - on the table limits of storage 'what' LUN a host has access to.  This is done in the form of storage groups.  * What can I access *.

  Either work around poses a great risk to corruption or destruction of data given that different operating systems can be read their native file systems.  E.g. If you had all your hosts in a storage group (ESX, Windows etc.) and tried to separate them only by a LUN ID, a simple change of 1 digit of the start ID LUN on the initiator target could lead a crowd to not read the file system and potentially right a new signature to the risk - replace your existing data.  Windows cannot read a linux partition and vice versa.

  Follow these best practices and your data will be much more safe & secure.

  Kind regards

  Robert

• Replication storage group

  Just a quick question about automated replication.

  I noticed that, sometimes, a stack of app will be automatically repeated at all storage in a storage group, as soon as the stack is created. Maybe it's just a coincidence of timing. Other times, I have to use the button repeated in storage group menu, which I am reluctant to do it because I guess, he is everything that the replication (in the case where there may be changes).

  Is there a timetable? Can I force replication just to a single appstack, for example by using a command line on the server?

  Just for reference, we use only local flash storage on the hosts for the non-persistent linked clones, so we need to replicate to all the machines see the battery.

  the timing is every 4 hours and no its not configurable. You can force replication, but not for a single AppStack. However if there is that one added and you force a replication, it will only replicate a new a

• How to work on the strategy of Distribution of the storage group?

  Any body can help me to understand the strategy of Distribution of the storage group?

  The App, the storage Volumes have the option below:

  Spread: Distribute files in all storage locations.
  When a file is created, the storage with the most available space is selected.

  Round-robin: Distribute files sequentially using the storage locations.
  When a file is created, with the oldest time used storage is selected.

  I don't know what is different from this two option. When I select this option, I can see on my environment? Thank you.

  I think that it is used only for writable volumes right?

  If you are using storage with appstacks groups all appstacks are synchronized between the two storage when you use the sync option.

  When you create writeable volumes in the storage group it will create in one of the stores of data defined in the storage group.

  Let's say your staorage is called ST1, ST2, ST3 and ST4 and ST1 and 2 are 100GB and 3 and 4 are 1000GO then that's what happens.

  East Round Robin

  ST1, ST2, ST3, ST4, ST1, ST2, ST3, ST4 and so on and so forth. It would take into space wanted account.

  With the other he will do

  ST3, ST4, ST3, ST4, until both have also 100 GB of disk space and it will then be evenly.

• Volume App storage groups

  Has someone already implemented App Volumes storage groups?

  I've set up a group of storage with the following parameters:

  • Automation: "Appstacks of auto import" and "Automatic Appstacks replicate" active
  • Distribution strategy: left by default to "spread" that this only applies to writable volumes according to the documentation and I don't use the accessible volumes in writing
  • Storage of model: I chose here the LUN where my appstacks
  • Selection of storage: Direct
  • Storage: I chose here the LUN I want my appstacks to replicate to

  but nothing seems to happen.

  I'm doing something wrong?

  Looks like you selected only 1 storage location. You must select 1 more data store for replication to occur. Typically, you would select the data store that you create the appstacks on (the same data store that you used for the storage of model) and data 1 or more additional warehouses to replicate. So, using the direct selection of storage, you must have a minimum of 2 warehouses of verified data.

• Adding a lun to multiple storage groups

  Is it OK to have the same LUNS in storage groups? I'll put up a new cluster and its own storage group. But I need to have other LUN mounted in the other cluster so that I can migrate virtual machines to this new cluster

  Fix. It's all basically just of masking.

• Max or recommended LUNS per storage group

  I can't find any definitive or maximum recommendation for the number of logical units (VMFS5), which can be placed in a storage group.

  Can someone point me to some documents that indicate this and possiblly some explanation of ups and downs?

  32 data warehouses by cluster of data by the maximum configuration store.

  http://www.VMware.com/PDF/vsphere5/R50/vSphere-50-configuration-maximums.PDF

• MS SQL or Exchange Storage Tuning Question

  Does anyone know how better to tune SQL or Exchange storage?

  We create 2 TB LUN using the SAS 8 x 300 GB on an IBM DS3400 FC SAN disks.

  (1) for the creation of the IBM Storage Manager dashboard, should what segment size we use? the indicated only are 128 KB or 256 KB. (512 can be done using the CLI)

  (2) what VMFS block size should be used? Then this SQL affect disk performance?

  (3) is there any special NTFS formatting required in the operating system (Windows Server 2003) to get better disk performance?

  Advice or guidance would be appreciated.

  Concerning

  Nicholas

  Reading the messages of various virtualization experts, the size of the block of VMFS has little impact on performance. If you have more than 256 GB virtual disks, then a larger block size would be better.

  Also, be sure to create the VMFS with Virtual Center partition as this will automatically align the VMFS.

  You need to align your XXXX in Windows Server 2003 for best performance. VMware has a guide that can be referenced here:

  http://www.VMware.com/PDF/esx3_partition_align.PDF

• Item number: 933779: an instant copy of a storage group backup fails and event IDS are logged in the application log in Exchange Server 2003

  Regarding the Article ID: 933779, after copying the system and logs in a backup location, and restart the server.  Place the files in the folder before doing a backup full?

  Help please.

  Hello

  For assistance on this issue, you can post your question in the Technet Forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/

• search criteria for groups vCops 5.6: child vs Descendant of?  + Nested groups...

  What is the difference between ascending to and Parent of / Descendant of and the child of?

  Also if I nest a group is a way to add the children of groups of children to parent group?

  For example:

  • Parent group: racks 1
  • Child group: BladeChassis1

  Can I create a rule to search on racks 1 group that will add children from BladeChassis1 to 1 racks as well.  This measure metric level additional host level racks 1.   I would go a little further and adds the VM guests in the BladeChassis1 to 1 racks as well.  This would allow the additional to consider level racks 1 VM metric.   I know that I can manually add virtual machines, but it won't work because virtual machines are able to migrate between hosts.

  Worse, I would create Super Metrics.   It just hurts to create Super Metrics, if summary data are available in the default user interface.

  Thank you

  -MattG

  Hi Matt,

  I guess I was not clear enough. "An object must match all of the criteria in this rule set to become a member of the group" - it's quite true. What I propose is to create two 'sets', each containing a criteria. individual rule sets are joined with the logical OR operator. Just click on the "Add a new set of rules" link and you will figure it out.

  Let me know if you still not the desired behavior, and I'll upload a screenshot of tomorrow to illustrate

• Pagination fails when searching through search results security groups

  When I'm doing research for a paper of the specific security group, in the search results pagination works fine. But when the research spans several security groups, the first page of the search results shows the number of law, but when you go on the following pages, the County is messed up. For example if the result total count value would be 400 in the first page. The second page would show only page 2 of 20 or something like that. and we can get on the pages after this. Is there a way to fix this?
  
  Thanks for your help!

  I also opened an SR for that matter, support seemed unfamiliar with it.

  I finally found a reference to the question of the basis of knowledge in bug 10055173. The proposed solution is to update CS10gR35UpdateBundle to a version > = 86. Version of this bundle is 79, so you must apply for it. I'm done with build 92.

  I installed the new version. The occurrence of the problem, however. Finally, I have disabled the SimpleProfiles component (which we do not), and this seems to have solved the problem. I also determined that disabling SimpleProfiles under generation 79 did not fix the issue.

• Search for EBS group

  Hi all

  EBS R12.1.3

  RHEL5.3

  I always create my level apps like applmgr with dba group owner

  I also create my level with the Group dba and Oracle db owner.

  I check other configuration of clients and I see their applmgr AIO group. I'm confused how to handle this cloning if I change the target to dba?

  I know that you can use any group like aaa, bbb, abc, etc. But how will this affect the apps or layers of db? How do you handle this different group name?

  Can I change my group dba to xxx?

  Please throw lights...

  Thank you very much

  JC

  Yes, in your case you can have a dba as a group. This is the related users Club as applmgr/oracle in the same group.

  You can name your users like applvis/appltest/oravis (similar to applmgr/oracle only to reflect the name of the instance). Similarly, you can change the name of the group. commonly accepted is s/n

  concerning

  Pravin