Multi-user with Yoga 10 HD +.

Hello

Android allows for multiple spaces user on shared devices such as tablets. Each user on a device has its own set of accounts, apps, system, files and other data associated with the user settings. The previous 10 Lenovo Yoga disabled this feature. This feature is available with the new Yoga 10 HD +?

Yes.

Man, I like the easier.

Tags: Lenovo Tablets

Similar Questions

  • New technology on the EA8500 MU will benefit users with older technology

    I'm looking for some advice REGUARDING the new EA8500... If your not sure if your devices are supported on the new MU technologyt then

    1 - How can you check your devices to see if they support the MU technology which offers EA8500. ? And

    2. I guess because it is so new, that all my devices do not have this ability and if I'm right is there an advantage for me to upgrade to the new EA8500? I like the idea of the function (multi-user) and think that it would improve my put through, but I am running windows 7, several (I pads, I have Mac, IPad mini Apple air, several every years) as a smart TV AND SMART THERMOSTS. Running ON a linksys EA4500 and I've been jumping this new Ea 8500 migh speed things up a little bit for me. Also have a very slow ISP run 10 mbs

    Thanks for advice or technical knowledge that might steere me in the right dirrection

    BJT...

    Thank you very much for getting back to me so quickly... My current setup is mostly wireless with just the smart TV cable.

    the other devices are all wireless. The EA 4500 router in a back room unfournitureitly but I get good signals upwards to the second floor and given that my ISP only pushes 10Mps using my p/c desktop and a laptop computer sony running windows 7 and the two using a usb adapter type N 900 AE 3000 , pc tracks fairly quickly with no drop-outs... The problem seems to occure when I'm at the same level as the router using an I Pad air and Mini or 3rd gen.or an Apple laptop look old for many years. The answer is horrible... Although my I touch gen.will 6 same in thoes receive locations that the iPad and computer laptop air apple don't work well in. It seems that the Androids have the same proublem... Of course, the Smart connected TV works fine with no dropouts.

    Once again thanks for your time... And I'm going to start looking for the plug on the devices. I thought maybe a signal extender?

    PS I shared the concert using 5 g hz or 2.4 at different times and it doesn't seem to help... in fact when I try and choose or change of 2.4 g to 5 g Ipads don't see the 5 g on occaisions network a lot...

    BJT

  • Same time multi-user?

    If I connect two sets of keyboards, mice and monitors to a single PC, can two users at the same time, use a running Win7 and one with Ubuntu?

    If so, I guess that is run directly on the host operating system.

    Can be used for 3 users? 4? What is the limit/equipment needs for this kind of use.

    ... Data access: if each user has its own operating system, it has its own system of files and data. No security problem...

    I don't know the guest OS security.  I mean the security of the host computer if a 'boy' to start the computer and you're not with us, but the keyboard and mouse config gets messed up.  The 'kid' needs access to VMware Workstation to get the USB menu, which means that they now have access to the files on the host computer.  So my example of password protecting individual files/folders and not relying on the main logon password.

    .. If I can't easily assign hardware by virtual machine, you are right, no point of going in that direction. and I thought the addition of audio cards to provide a function audio...

    Audio can be done with the USB sound cards.  This brings us then to the question of the enough USB ports, which can mean the USB PCI card, and then you have enough PCI slots.  And my previous point that all this extra material is adding up.  You need to analyze if you really save that much $$$ by doing low-end all-in-one compared to individual machines.  Imagine the 'kid' play a clip from YouTube or some other videos Flash the CPU of pigs and bog down other users.  (Or worse, WoW).  What have you really reduce other than the power supply casing, motherboard,?   The user third need a video card given that most of the cards can manage only 2 monitors.  (Or fourth user, if you also use integrated graphics).  But once again you have enough PCI slots for cards USB, you need to add?  Or had the intention of getting a ka-zillion USB hubs?  That could restrict you the transfer of large files to USB hard drives because you share the USB bandwidth.  (Oops, Bobby accidentally bumped the power cord on the hub, external hard drive of disconneting Becky, while she wrote the disk.  Now, the reader is corupt and must redo its homework.  Dad!  And now Wifey says it cannot open the tax files!  )

    ... But what scares me, is that you said that the world of the virtual machine is not mature enough and not stable...

    This thing 'multi-user' was found several years without virtualization.  You have added a PCI card that gave you a monitor, keyboard, mouse connection.  The cost was a little high (~ $300 per unit) and you always had to deal with things like limited hard disk space, (then add the cost of additional hard drives), buy additional audio cards, slowing the host when a users inadvertently ran something CPU intensive, or system crash, forcing a restart of all, etc. , etc, etc.  It was all without adding any of the limitations of virtualization so much questions that I'm pointing out have nothing to do with the 'maturity' of virtualization.  It's the limitations inherent in a shared PC project.  My cousin was a librarian at an elementary school and investigating such a system.  Finally, as the PCs are down less than $1,000, it was considered as more sensible and easier to maintain (aka less specialized technical knowledge) for parts 'standards' rather than 'custom' systems, especially when it has been factored into the much higher cost of the consolidated host.  And realize that it was a public elementary school, where the children could do things that 'broken' system, intentional or not.  Now place your orders on the system and see how your children will plant your configuration when they are Torrenting or YouTubing, despite your repeated warnings not to do that. (Because we know that children always to listen to their parents.)

    Therefore, if the number very restricted users "of trust", which is fine.  But the point is to go through all the theoretical scenarios.  So even if you have to allocate hardware devices, so in a multiuser system is always a number very limited situations.  Like I said, theoretically possible.  Practical but only up to a point.

  • Using the free account but pro option not available for upgrade only multi-user

    Why am I not given the possibility to opt for a free account multi-user account? I want to upgrade to Pro's Free. I did this 2 - 3 times before in recent years. Anyone seen this before? I have attempted to remedy this by online chat with no help given and my support ticket has been underway for a few days now.

    Thanks, for the reply. EchoSign support responded twice to me this morning which was a pleasant surprise. They had to make a change to my user name that allowed me to access the Pro upgrade page. I don't know what the problem was, but they fixed. Everything is good now. It comes to the screen, that I was taken in when I clicked on the link to upgrade you mentioned.

  • Development multi User (MUD) - appear dosent option local modification of the merger

    Hi, I'm new to OBIEE and I encounter a problem merging my local changes.
    When I try to merge the project into MUD, in the Administration tool, I don't see the option ' changes local merger ' in file > multi-user.
    The options available are

    Multi-user >
    Checkout
    Compare with the Original
    Refresh the subset
    Publish on network
    Unpublish
    Discard local changes
    can someone please let me know what Im doing wrong

    Published by: ABoini on September 29, 2012 09:32

    Hello

    In 11.1.1.6, "local merger change" and options "Published to the network" has been merged into one. Publish on network will take care of these two fusion and publish.

    Kind regards
    DpKa

  • 5.1.7 server on El Capitan: create a user with a personalized folder location

    I've recently upgraded to El Capitan on my server once an apple advisor told me that 5.1.7 server had a bunch of bug fixes for Open Directory(which I plan on using down the road). Given that the Working Group Manager is not compatible with 10.11...

    Is there a way to create a user with a personalized folder location? When I create a user on the server, I can choose to create a home folder, with or without limitation in the disc or make the service of the user only. My problem is that I have no way (that I know) in the window of creating user to change the location of this folder.

    I tried to create a model of a user with a basic 'tailor-made' folder location (Volume/promised Pegasus/Home 2016 / etc...) but when I create the user, the home folder is not in the specified path.

    The "work around" I found for this batch of user is to create in the default location then move them on my raid Promise Pegasus, change the path to the advanced option to the each user and reassign the appropriate permissions.

    It is not so much a problem if I would deal with users 10. But I have to manage/create about 130-150 users every 5-6 months.

    I guess that there is an easier way to create a user with a custom home folder location. It would make sense that apple removes the Workgroup Manager and does not replace its characteristics.

    Best case scenario is that I do evil and do not hesitate to let me know if this is the case!

    Thank you

    Francis

    I may be wrong, but it seems that Workgroup Manager version 10.8 works under El Capitan: I can certainly start the application and query users / groups that are there.  I guess maybe it's on the machine as a rest to be updated periodically since days Lion... but it also shows that if you can find a copy, you may be able to run on your machine.

    HTH

  • MacBook Pro OS 10.8.5 multi-user login loop.

    Suddenly my Macbook Pro mid-2010 Mountain Lion 10.8.5 running would not allow any user to connect.  The system starts successfully at the connection of the login screen.  I have 2 users on the window, a user with the administrator and standard user rights.  When I enter the password for each user with that it seems to work the colorful spinning ball and then the grey train like thing. Then it goes to a white/gray screen and then returns to the screen connection again.  I researched and found a lot of Info for a similar problem (the problem only affected only one user on Mac), but nothing for 10.8.5.  I started using the safe, but the problem remains the same.  I ran disk utility on recovery without any problem drive.  Started in single-user and run fsck - fy until he says ok.  Removed caches in / library and/System/Library, but nothing has worked.   Any other suggestions?

    Restart your computer, hold down the option/alt - P - R keys command before the gray screen appears. Continue until you hear the startup chime for the second time.

    Reset the NVRAM EXTRA memory

    Try a SMC reset. Article covers when necessary, but this will not affect anything.

    Reset the SMC

  • Yosemite: Why 'Shares and Permissions' displays 2 all users with different privileges?

    Some folders and files inside my user folder sharing and permissions like this:

    I can remove the user from "search...". "(a user who has been deleted and no longer exists) but I don't know what to do on both"all"users with different permissions. I can't delete the one with custom privileges. Help!

    Solved by Leroy Douglas. See What are these custom privileges?

  • Functions defined by the user with several parameters

    I set features three following user using "Define."

    UF1 takes a single patameter;

    UF2 takes two parameters;

    and UFX takes two parameters - with the second is 'X' in the definition.

    Œuvres F1.  F2 is the EVAL of F1 version and it works too.  User functions only seem to work fine.

    F3, a function of two user settings, produces a graph of NaN.

    F4 is the EVAL of F3 version.  Note that 'B 'is not replaced by 1'.  Also produces a NaN chart.

    F5 produces a graph of NaN.

    F6 is EVAL of F5.  The 'X' is not replaced (even with the ' B' above), and even if it looks like 'X * X', it also produces a graph of NaN.

    Is it possible to get defined by the user, with several parameters, features work by tracing the curve?

    Hi!, Fortin:

    If you download and install the ultimate Firmware with the version of the software: 2015 6 17 (8151), with the number of Version: 1.1.2 - 11, you can trace your examples of definition of the function, with curves and values, without NaN.

  • You need permission to perform this action - field user with file rights. Please advice

    You need permission to perform this action - field user with file rights.

    I can't access folder on drive network even with domain administrator of error do 'you need permission to perform this action. "
    I would be very grateful if you could please advice, I can't change folder\files in this folder, even with admin rights.
    Thanks in advance
    Saad Ali

    Hello

    I suggest you post the same question in the Microsoft Technet forum for assistance. We have a team to help you with this guy's questions.

  • can you multi delete with out checking all of the boxes.

    Can u multi delete with out checking all of the boxes.

    This is for email, but it is almost global.
     
    To remove all the: select one and Ctrl + A will highlight all. -Delete.
     
    To delete a section: highlight the first one you want to remove. Scroll to last and click while holding down the SHIFT key. -Delete.
     
    To delete several messages that alternate: hold down the CTRL key while you click each message in order to highlight. -Delete.
  • Cannot delete the account of a user with administrator rights

    I want to remove a user who has administrator rights account.  Win XP machine has two users (Administrator and a user name) that both are of type of administrator account.

    I you as an administrator and should be able to change the other named to Limited user account, but for Limited is greyed out.  The option to delete the named account is not present.

    How can I delete this account, leaving only administrator?

    Often, I find that using the command line commands gives errors better when you can not do something.  Try the following:

    o bring a window prompt (start-> Run-> "cmd")

    o enter the following command in the window:

    net localgroup administrators

    o that it must return a list of all users with administrator privileges.  You should see the built-in user 'Administrator' and your other user (assuming that both have administrator privileges).  To remove administrator privileges from the user (assuming that this another username is "Joe"), then enter the following command:

    net localgroup administrators Joe/remove

    If this is not possible, an error no doubt will provide you with enough information.

    HTH,

    JW

  • User with limited XP Home Edition privleges can not access an external hard drive

    I can't set up an external hard drive in Windows XP Home Edition so that a user who has 'Limited' privleges can access.  The user receives the access denied message.  I tried to configure this by starting in safe mode.  I shared the unit with everyone.  If I'm the administrator user then it can access the drive.  The troubling question is that this system has been configured with the user having limited privleges as well as access to the external drive in the past.  I recently removed Norton antivirus and replaced by MS Security Essentials and I'm so glad I did.  But now it's problem arose.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    You probably just need to change permissions for access of the disk and/or subfolders.  The following article describes how to do this:

    "How to set, view, change, or remove special permissions for files and folders in Windows XP"
      <>http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/308419 >

    The bad news is that this article was written for XP Pro and you have XP Home.  This means that the 'Security' tab, which is at the heart of the management of permissions is not present during the implementation of the properties of file or a folder on your computer. (Or y at - it an option to disable Simple file sharing).  The good news is that if you start your computer in safe mode (repeatedly tap the F8 key when your computer starts) and log on as a user with administrator privileges, you can then obtain access to the security"" tab.  Once you have access to this tab, you can give "Everyone" permission to all of the disk if you wish.  Once you set the permissions as you like them, you can restart your machine in Normal mode.

    HTH,
    JW

  • try to install a printer and receive a message error «software cannot be installed...» To resolve this problem, log off and log in as a user with administrative privileges.

    original title: help installing a printer

    I try to install a printer on my computer and continue to receive an error message indicating that the "software cannot be installed using the command" run as ".". To resolve this problem, he told me to sign out and then sign in as a user with administrative privileges. I am the owner of this computer and that you have had for several years. I need to know how to solve this problem. Can anyone help?

    Hello

    have you tried right clicking on setup.exe printing software then run as administrator?

  • Multi-user, same computer, printing problems - I can, my wife can not

    I bought a HP Photosmart 6520 yesterday to replace a 6510.  I could get installed it on my computer at home.  However, it does work when I am connected to the computer.  My wife uses this computer more than I do, and when it is connected to the computer with its own credentials that she cannot print anything.  What are we doing to ensure that all users can print (also two grown children who use it occasionally)?

    What operating system?

    My guess would be the security settings.  If you use Windows 7 do the following: log in as a user with administrative capabilities.  Click on start, devices and printers.  Right-click on the Photosmart 6520, select printer properties, security.  Click on everyone and click on checkboxes to allow to print, manage this printer and manage documents, apply.

    For other Windows systems, procedures would be similar.

Maybe you are looking for

  • ML350 G6: NIC ML350 driver

    Hello I'm in a bit of a catch 22, since a driver update manager or windows may be able to find the right one, but I cannot connect to the internet, and to connect to the internet, I need the diver. I have a ML350 G6 run a clean install of Win7 pro x

  • restoration of my iphoto on my mac pro book library

    the restoration of my iphoto on my mac pro book library.  I am importing some pictures and my macbook pro shutdown and restarted on its own.  after which iphoto would not respond.  I tried to open it several times and several times with the key of th

  • no windows startup

    IV lost all my windows and can't recharge my screen xp NTLDR is missing and that the acpi-sys file is corrupt

  • change suddenly in the front and back with Word 2010 and JO 8600 Pro printer

    I have been successfully using Word 2010 and my Officejet Pro 8600 - to set duplexing if necessary. I used printing without margins to print 8.5 X 11 brochure and was happy with the result (no white space on both sides). However, this somehow messed

  • Problem of parameters of Malware Protection Check

    I have Windows Vista 32 bit HP.  My Format of Malware Protection is no longer supported byWindows security system.  How can I get the right Format installed. My Windows Update is in progress, but I still have this problem of Malware Protection... Hel