My low bandwidth of WRT160NL


It is Upnp issue! If I disable Upnp, there is no more problems of speed!

But it is hard to get along without UPnP. It is essential that a router is included in this function.

Please fix this as soon as possible!

Tags: Linksys Routers

Similar Questions

  • How to optimize the website on low bandwidth

    I created a web site when it is displayed with a low bandwidth connection load javascripts to slow and sometimes it would break the layout, caused by the slow connection.

    All the JS files are minimized. The css file is compressed.

    I placed a few inline css in the head for a faster execution of an image slider.

    Images are reduced to the size of the file when it is possible.

    Maybe I forgot something in the doc, but I'm stuck on web site optimization.

    I hope that someone in the community has some tips and tricks on this topic.

    Kind regards

    Carla

    Here's an avalanche of tips and tricks: perf.rocks

    To target the poor with internet users (or even lie-fi), I would include the service workers to the top of the list.

    Equally important, remove absolutely everything that is not critical to the user. This includes images of high-fidelity, elements that are not visible, sliders, followed scripts, buttons that bounces, fonts and many other things. (They can be loaded after semi-critical items.)

    I use the function "Emulate network connectivity" of the Chrome Dev Tools to discover the site as internet users slow do. Webpagetest.org offers similar features.

  • Updates of player for low bandwidth areas

    I would like to learn the best way to plan updates player for a low-bandwidth environment.

    We look at Intune use to deploy updates on Win 7 Ent machines, and many of them will be areas of Africa and only very expensive bandwidth, usually in a small office with 5 to 10 other machines in the company.

    It's great that updated quarterly security release Adobe, but the last were about 50 MB.

    While Intune and Win 7 Ent will allow machines to the same local network to share an update (so it is downloaded only once on the Internet), a 50 MB download is still big enough and it could easily saturate a VSAT connection for a day.  Or if someone on a BGAN connection, she might hire a fee of $25!  The BGAN is an extreme example, as we'll have updates for these people.

    The main question would be is there a way to minimize the size of the updates of the player, or they will always be about 50MB?

    Second, is there an install switch that turns off the automatic check for updates?  (as this prompt is annoying for customers and they don't have permission to install updates)

    Thirdly, Intune wants to check if the software is installed before deploying the it's and can run a check of reg key.  Where can I find the reg key relevant for each new version of the player?

    I checked http://www.adobe.com/devnet-docs/acrobatetk/tools/AdminGuide/sccm.html for the reg key info (SCCM is the closest Intune) and checked http://www.adobe.com/devnet-docs/acrobatetk/tools/AdminGuide/cmdline.html to try to find a switch which disables auto-update, but no joy.

    All advice welcome - I am new on this!

    Hi eryan24,

    HTH,

    Ben

  • Problems with cross certification over a link to low bandwidth to the domain controllers in the same forest

    I need to explain to a user a simple explanation on why this is not an effective solution for filing committed in different places trying to share a single file. The file is an excel document and the original file would be shared at 4 different locations on 4 separate domain controllers. The link is weak across all domains at best and the file is accessible by several people at the same time. Server 2003

    Hello

    I suggest you send the same question in the Microsoft Technet Forum for assistance. We have a dedicated team to help you with such questions.
    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/windowsxpitpro

  • Low bandwidth, disk Options?

    I am a long time user of Photoshop (since version 3.0 in 1993) and hesitated to go cloud option (latest version of disc was CS5) because here in Alaska internet sucks eggs if you do not live in a metropolitan area. All of the rural area here have little or no internet (same 12 miles outside Fairbanks). So that being said, I signed up for CC yesterday in the hopes that I could get the disks from Adobe, or have direct links that I could download the content to a place with internet better. But so far I have not found these links to CC 2015.5. So I ask if there is a way to send discs to paying customers who have similar problems? If this isn't the case, can provide you some direct download links so that customers who pay like myself can I access content to another location, to copy to a disc to disc/burn thumb to bring to install on your device? I use a Mac at home and a laptop that I can download the content too. I hope that other options are available, or I'll have to cancel my subscription.

    Søren

    As far as I know...

    1 - NO disk... later has no link direct http://prodesigntools.com/adobe-cc-no-more-direct-download-links.html

    2 - the latest version does not have a direct download, it's a "multichannel" download using a special Downloader

    I think you can download older versions from response #1 here https://forums.adobe.com/thread/2081216

    If this does not work for you, I think you have to cancel

  • FF resolution settings to lower the consumption of bandwidth

    What versions of FF will do and what the specific settings are there for lower bandwidth consumption?

    In addition, the FF settings will be override settings on sites like youtube? For example, if my children were to click on a higher resolution or HD video settings for their videos on youtube, what would happen?

    Changing the resolution has no effect on the performance of Firefox, and can even be worse if you operate an LDC monitor not in its native resolution.

    You can block content if you ant to improve performance of a connection to low broadband bandwidth.

    You can watch Adblock Plus.

    You must subscribe to a list of filters (for example the EasyList).

  • RV042 cannot summarize upstream bandwidth

    Hi all,

    Since I bought my CISCO RV042 (v3 hardware, firmware v4.1.1.01 - sp December 6, 2011 20:03:18) I couldn't leave work properly with my two llines of DSL network.

    I explain.

    I had 2 DSL network:

    1 - PPPoE with authentication (MTU set as auto) with 4 Mbps of upstream and downstream speed 5 Mbit/s speed

    2-direct line with IP static with 7Mbit/S of upstream and downstream Speed 1Mbps speed

    I never could SUM the two WAN by using all of the LOAD BALANCE.

    I tried all combinations:

    DSL 1 in WAN 1 or 2 WAN

    DSL 2 in 2 WAN or 1 WAN

    I set any speeds speed WAN management Web

    It seems, for some sort of reason it takes of the upstream speed, I can put web management default value on which he decides to use the other WAN.

    When I put the low-bandwidth for DSL 2 upstream, it is able to sum up the endorsements of WAN but not the upstreams.

    I was never not abel to add the upstreams?

    How does it work?

    There is no work around for this problem?

    Thanks in advance

    Frank

    FRA,

    Load Balancing is used to balance the traffic accroos the two links for not using the two links at the same time for the same traffic. For example, it can be configured to send 1 PC on a line and PC2 on another, or you might send http link and https via two connection. Once you start sending links to two the same session, unless you use virtual MAC or virtual IPs. You'll have session issues and drop packets.

    I hope this helps.

    Cisco Small Business Support Center

    Randy Manthey

    CCNA, CCNA - security

  • SX20, MX200G2, and MX300G2 consumes same bandwidth as the SX80/MX700/MX800?

    Guys,

    If I understand well SX80/MX700/MX800 H.265 codec has put in place and then have half of bandwidth consumed compared to the older codecs. I noticed for a while most video conferencing codec Cisco including SX20, MX200G2/MX300G2 data sheet has band bandwidth information updated with 720p30 with 768 Kbps. This average series SX20 support H.265 also? Or it's just the mistake of plug technique Cisco?

    In addition, when these codec supports H.265 talk to MCU or webex RMC, they will always use double bandwidth because the other end does not support H.265 yet, correct?

    Thank you.

    Lou

    H.265 is only supported on SX80/MX700/MX800 and only when using SIP.

    Once you call a device, or introduce a device in the call that does not support H.265, well, so he won't need to use it.

    720p30 at 768 KPS is not full HD, is not a mistake.

    is 1080 p full HD, and to do this you will need a lot of higher bandwidth, and that's where all the benefits of the H.265 kicks in which can give you full HD at a lower bandwidth.

    /Jens

    Please note the answers and score the questions as "answered" as appropriate.

  • Bandwidth for remote nodes Collector needs

    Hello

    Is there a sort of calculator available which specify how much bandwidth should be available from the master node to nodes of collector at a distance, according to the number of objects, VMs, hosts, clusters etc or any documentation of how much bandwidth vROps uses?

    Erik

    EDIT: What I am trying to determine is if it is feasible to sites/locations of low bandwidth to send data to the master node or if vROps will saturate the link completely. There should be documentation on this right?

    Calculator for vR network Ops, not just that moment. This will depend on the volume object of County and the perception (metrics #). But it's also based on what, exactly, actually each MP. Some are heavier than others with regarding the API calls and what they swallow you up the data source. However, if we are talking about only the data we keep, call 24 bytes per metric. Assuming you're metric collecting 1 million, it will end up being about 22.8 MB per 5 min. Once you get a RC in there, he will manage the dirty part of the collection of data and normalize the data down to something effective for transfer to analytical nodes. Thus, a RC certainly can not harm a remote site which got a WAN as well as the link between the data source and the analytical cluster nodes. Here are a few guidelines-

    Between nodes of cluster analytic and remote collectors, make sure that your WAN latency is less than 200ms.

    From a throughput perspective, the use of the analytic node-to-RC network will be a little lower than if you use sources of knots-to-data analytics. This is because the RC makes the collections of raw data from a source data, and then standardized and cleans data before it sends it to the analytic node.

    Another consideration is the tail... the remote sensors will be given queue and attempts for 2 min if it loses connectivity to the Analytics lymph. After less than 2 minutes, it will move the data queued and pull fresh from the source of data on the next collection interval and repeat the cycle. This gives you a small stamp on the unreliable WAN links.

    So, no inconvenience to the RCs in the EXTENDED network scenarios, make us them in good standing if you have anything other than a high quality fat WAN link.

  • How to test bandwidth continuously on localhost with Flash Media Server?

    Hello

    I'm trying debbug my code (ActionScript 3) client that works with Flash Media Server 4 on localhost. Everything seems fine until this day.

    However, when I'm testing my player with other remote streaming servers, I notice the bugs because of the transmission of lower bandwidth between the server and the player.

    Is there a simple way to simulate lower bandwidth with FMS4 on localhost (with config, application.xml, programming...)?

    Thank you

    SEB Ethier

    Have you tried using Client.setBandwidthLimit () API available in SSAS? He can probably help you with what you want to do.

    Beside that, you can use NetLimiter or shunra utlitiy to choke BW like client-side.

    Hope that will help you.

  • How to Segment LAN/WLAN with TimeCapsule and third party LAN

    Hello

    I have a bit of a delicate situation. I need to speed up my (W) LAN through segmentation and hope that many of you might be able to help here.

    Currently my TimeCapsule connects via its WAN for a FritzBox with DHCP port. 255.255.255.0 subnet / host 192.168.178.1 TC router is turned off (bridge mode). The TC creates a wireless network. The FritzBox connects to the ISP and a lot other customers outside the TimeCapsule.

    The first WLAN TimeCapsule is extended by a second TimeCapsule. A couple AppleTV and expresses the airport are connected in the scope wireless of the 2nd TimeCapsule but far out of reach for first time capsule. Apple network and FritzBox network clients need NOT communicate with each other. It will be even better if they were aware, because there are other AppleTV, printers, servers UPnP, stream movie, etc.

    Thus, the 2nd TimeCapsule acts as a 'bridge' for the internet.

    Now, I want to segment the LAN (W). The main reason is to reduce traffic. The two TimeCapsules to connect with a very low bandwidth, because there are a whole bunch of concrete between the two. Since then, there are a LOT of current traffic, customers and also the internet connection around my TimeCapsules is not responding to most of the time.

    Is it possible to segment the LAN (W) with my first TimeCapsule and create a LAN (W) dedicated?

    Thank you very much for your help!

    I think that you need good QoS or limitation if I read your message.

    Give me real numbers.

    What is the max download and upload becomes your Frtizbox? Many real world real... using ethernet for the Fritzy and anything else using the bandwidth.

    The first link to the TC1 on ethernet should be no problem... but the TC2 wireless link is probably give you mediocre results... and there is very little you can do about it... have you tried or considered using adapters EOP. (homeplug to the United States).

    If you take the link that will help you.

    Segment the network's not going help the problem that I see.

    What model is the Christopher? Is there a QoS limitation or even decent with the limitation of bandwidth?

    You can set IP alias or VLAN on that?

    What model is the TC?

  • AirPlay - aTV video, sound effects for AExpress: does not work with large files

    Hello!

    My setup

    • Internett--> modem (Cisco?) --> a/c Airport Extreme (latest high version)
    • iMac, iPad, 2 x iPhones. iMac installed Beamer.
    • Bedroom: AppleTV 3rd GEN rev A - hdmi--> LG TV (old). AirPlay ON, 'Apple TV room '. Connected to the local network of 5 GHz.
    • Bedroom: AirportExpress 1st GEN 802.11 a/b/g N-Draft (last type of those that go right into the socket) with AirPlay - stereo--> stereo BOSE. AirPlay ON, 'room '. Connected to the local network of 5 GHz I also tried to connect 2.4 GHz network, no significant variation...
    • Living room: AppleTV 4th Gen. - hdmi--> LG TV (new). AirPlay ON, "iTV."

    Problem (abridged version)

    Most of the time - but not every time - when I stream video + audio iMac to aTV and choose to listen to the audio portion of the aTV to a separate AExpress (which is connected to a better BOSE audio system), the movie will not play. Streaming both audio and video - and only - the aTV works perfectly, but then I have bad sound, since I use the TV's internal speakers. What is reasons for it? Tips to fix it?

    Problem (full version)

    Every time when I stream video and audio from large multimedia files (about 3-4 GB .mkv) of the iMac (Beamer) on the ATV to the room, I didn't encounter any problem. Buffering is fast (2-4) and there is no delay or other negative experience. Unfortunately, as with all flat TVs, the sound of the TV is poor. Since I have a BOSE sound system, placed around this TV, I like to use it for audio. As I do this is - after the streaming media file (Beamer) iMac to the bedroom aTV - pressing the Center "Select" button during 1 sec on the remote to display the "audio" preferences and select money "Chamber" (AExpress related to the BOSE sound system). In this way, I think that audio + video is streamed to the iMac on the ATV in the bedroom, and the sound is then broadcast the ATV to the AExpress. This is where the problem occurs. Sometimes it works very well, as today in the morning. No lag and everything works fine. But most of the time, after changing the preference "audio" in the sound stream for the BOSE, the beginning of the play symbol buffering becomes the symbol of the break and nothing happens. I hit play again and the symbol of the game / buffering symbol lights up for a few seconds, and then again to pause. She never starts.

    The problem usually occurs with heavy multimedia files / large size 1080 p and 3-4 GB, not with the simplest 720 p files weighing about 1 to 2 GB. This makes me think it's a matter of WiFi capability. But if my WiFi network should not be able to manage that? I think that the apple TV in the bedroom and the AExpress uses the N standard, so it is the limiting factor. But if this interface should not be able to handle the traffic? Is it true that do what I do - separate the video and audio - use twice the network traffic?

    I also want to mention that everything works perfectly at certain times, like this morning. Last night (12 h) it wouldn't work at all... Perhaps there are more traffic yesterday (Saturday) evening.

    Questions (summarizes all Qs in text and some new)

    1. My network be able to handle the traffic encountered at the stream video + audio iMac to mountain BIKING in the room and streaming audio of ATV to AExpress at the same time?
    2. It is true that this configuration requires / use twice the network resources?
    3. Do you also think that my problem is caused by a network limited issue / the amount of data PR. second?
    4. I have a new (flat unit with power cord separate) Airport Express. This device manage more traffic and thus possibly resolve my problem?
    5. Other suggestions to solve my problem?

    Sorry for long post, but I think that its better with much info little. Have a great Sunday =)

    I think I can explain the reason for the problem... but I have little experience with sound problems... so you will need to figure out a work around.

    The nature of wireless networks, it's to manage the stream very well... but they are much less good at the sensitive time of things like multimedia transmission continuously. In fact, if you want to stream multimedia content over wireless, it is preferable to use specialized units... no wifi. I have a 3D projector and home theater system that uses a special wireless link from Epson to the projector... It is amazing that it can handle the required data of 3D projection. It does so by using 60GHz or some these extremely high FREQ... and totally dedicated units... no wifi. In the end, we ran an HDMI cable in the wall... it was largest wireless but not could be started reliably. Wireless is simply not ready for the big time of streaming video high definition even when dedicated.

    Wireless network adapter... It is wifi, can handle only one connection at a time and it time slices between clients. It's also half-duplex, so it can only send or receive... it can't do both at the same time.

    On the other hand, modern interrrupteurs ethernet can stream to multiple devices at the same time. It can also handle send them and receive at the same time... That is to say in full duplex. This is why the networks ethernet much more suitable for media streaming wireless never can be.

    As soon as you try to use double flow... even if it is audio (low bandwidth) and a video (broadband), you will cause huge delays to the video component. The video stream has literally if stop to give the time to the audio to catch up... you can immediately see where this will lead. Low resolution, it might work... but at high resolution, there is bandwidth inadequate considering the Division of time.

    It would be much better to use the audio on the TV. Or check if the TV itself has audio output... that plug into the standard analog audio system RCA or it could even have out optical. Who will then provide a means by which the flow must not be split. My samsung smart TV offers you both.

    The other solution probably won't be viable... execution of ethernet.

  • Control Panel suddenly stops downloading at 90%

    Hello

    I have a running in a cRIO Vi and I want to control it with a web browser (Internet Explorer 7). The cRIO is connected to the internet with a modem GPRS (GPRS of Multitech MultiModem).

    Because the GPRS connection is low bandwidth, I can open the panels of remote façade of small screws, but the main Vi, always, stops download exactly 90 seconds and means a download of about 90%, as shown in the image I ve attached. To open the remote front panels small screws tooks 90 seconds.

    The time-out for the Configuration of the Web server, in the cRIO, is 360 seconds. I, also, modified, witout success, the KeepAliveTimeout 600000 = and ServerInfoTimeou = 600000, for Internet Explorer (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/813827/en-us).

    Thus, any idea on what could happen?

    Thank you.

    Hello

    A few days ago, I called to the Brazil OR ask for help. They suggested me to use a more recent version of Labview.

    I was using the software provided with the Developer Suite 8.5.1 (LV 8.5.1, LV 8.5.1, 8.5.1, RIO FPGA RT driver NOR-RIO 2.4.0).

    Now I m using the Suite Developer 8.6.0 (LV 8.6.0, LV 8.6.0, FPGA 8.6.0, RT driver NOR-RIO Rio 3.0.0).

    The issue has been resolved because with the new version of Labview, the front is smaller (approximately 144kbytes) with LV8.5.1 (about 230kbytes). So, due to this fact, the façade remotely download in less than 90seconds.

    Thanks to all who help.

  • Use of iSCSI as the source for the work of copying using rsync

    How?

    A simple task, I have an ix2 - dl in raid 1 and all the space is designated for iSCSI.

    Now, I want to back up these data to another NAS using rsync

    I looked at the help and didn't see the answer.

    I'm not an expert, but I don't think that this is possible. I asked a question a while back on the use of the Mozy backup service to replicate files on a remote server and I was told that the ISCSI disk space is not visible on the Iomega drive so that you can transfer the data. I was told that you must back up the PC that has the ISCSI drive. For me, it was unacceptable, since the ISCSI drive was on my laptop and I could be anywhere. Then the data must leave my NAS, trip to my PC (everywhere where I am, maybe with a low bandwidth) and will then travel to the remote server (i.e. Mozy). Here is the link to my other post. http://forums.Lenovo.com/T5/Iomega-network-storage/iSCSI-backup-Iomega-IX2/m-p/1246171/highlight/Tru...

  • Any way to induce latency for VISA TCPIP

    I'm trying to debug the behaviour on my program with very poor connectivity networks, but I can't find a way to get poor connectivity I want. Anyone know of any kind of VISA or windows debugging tool, where I can intentionally introduce latency spikes, etc.?

    There are a lot of tools / options listed in this stackoverflow question:

    http://StackOverflow.com/questions/130354/how-do-i-simulate-a-low-bandwidth-high-latency-environment

Maybe you are looking for