NEITHER 9205

Similar Questions

• NEITHER 9205 in a task; error-200077

  I'm trying to set up a task to read all 16 channel differential on a NI 9205.

  I get an error-200077 when I get to add channel8 (from count to zero) to the task, almost as if the software

  It's an e-mail with asymmetric 16-8 differential channels, not 32/16 like in reality.

  Anyone, no matter what?

  Use AI0 - 7 and HAVE 15-23

  AI8 is the - side of AI0

• NEITHER 9205 fpga digital output

  Hey Gang,

  Hardware people left me with having to toggle the output of the NI 9205 DO0.  I looked hard, but have not found anywhere where the PFIO and/or DO0 pin code feature is described.  Part I/O of the application is written using the mode of FPGA.  Of course, I would be able to control this bit of LabVIEW.

  All responses will be welcome!

  Thank you

  Roger

  Good,

  I'm embarrassed!

  I had inputs and outputs bass-ackward in my head.  I took a digital Voltmeter to pin.

  Everything is fine, except, perhaps, my brain!

  Roger

• NEITHER 9205 always returns the noise from rail to rail.

  Hi all

  I'm completely stumped on this one. I went through the procedure of implementation of the NI 9205 module in my project. Setting the channel to the appropriate type. Placed the node IO in my FPGA code, read and all I get is noise from rail to rail, that is, whatever the measurement range is, I'm getting noise across the range. I ran it as a measure of CSR, as a measure differential, differential with COM updated wrt my diet, differential with COM Earth and the mass of the chassis connected to my powersupply ground.

  Rail to rail noise ringing bells for anyone?

  I checked with an oscilloscope that the appropriate signal is seen on the pins in all the configurations above. I even unplugged and plugged a 3 v battery through the pines and still noise from rail to rail get.

  Help!

  HM, I used the 9205 before, but didn't have never seen something like this. I am more fan of data buffering in a FIFO, rather than reading a control value, but still, you shouldn't see this kind of securities for a reason that I don't see. I had problems with the modules where something is messed up and randomly, the signal will drop out then go back (in fact, I am about to send an or because it is still under warranty, but it's in a portable box, so I think that he may have had problems with shock or something of the sort). I wish I had a good answer for you, but you seem you know what you're doing, so it could be one of those cases where there is a hardware problem.  You have any other module HAVE you can share and see if those working in this niche? You can try it in a different location to maybe see there is a connection from bad backplane? You can also check if your local rep OR has a loan that they can indulge for a day, just to see if another 9205 works. Usually, these are the steps I take when I think that there may be a hardware problem. Unfortunately, except that I don't have a lot of input for you.

• NEITHER 9205 digital output configuration with DAQ Assist

  Hello

  I have two NI 9205 Analog Input Modules which I have configured to read from each of their 32 channels.  I used the DAQ Assistant help generate the vi which contains the task out - DAQmx event and also the DAQmx Read vi.

  I used the Wizard twice, once for each module 9205 and then put the playback functions in a sequence structure so that only read would be carried out at the same time.  It all works very well!

  Now, I want to add in the code to wait in a loop before all loop containing playback functions, so that the user can press the GUI to send a logic 1 to the unit under test, and after it is sent immediately starts collecting data.

  The DAQ Assistant Help does not recognize the module 9205 when I try to set up a task to write a digital output.  9205 a 1 digital output so why is the wizard does not recognize this?  I also tried to create a task manually, but I got stuck.

  Someone please help.  I can reach the source if needed, but I thought that the descriptions above were sufficient.

  Thank you

  Gary

  Hello

  You are right it shows a line in this user manual, and in fact, you have found an instance where an important piece of information was left out of the documentation. This digital output line is actually only available when you use a cRIO chassis. It will not work with the chassis for the acquisition of data compact 9172. Here is a knowledge base that explains it. I'll also go ahead and file a request for corrective measures so that this note be included in the next version of this manual. Thanks for the comments.

  Chris

• NEITHER 9205 multichannel devices

  Hello

  I use two 9205 materials nor supporter of tensions. When I connect one fo the features everything seems to be ok. When I conncet the second device, I can't read the correct value for the voltage. I had read that change the sampling frequency and the convert clock would help, but I don't know how to do this.

  Can someone help me?

  The module nor 9205 are connected to a device or cDaq-9172.

  Concerning

  Hi, I had read the message but I don't undesrstand how to change samplig rates and the clock to convert?

  Do you know how to do this? I'm doing the modification in the VI suggestd in this message but returns an error.

  Tahnks for your attention

• Sync module NI 9205 with NOR-9234

  Hello

  I have a cDAQ-9178 chassis with 4 x accelerometers IEPE PCB 16 absorbent of NOR-9234 (DSA). I have a NOR-9205 I intend to use to acquire the power of 4 problems. The NI - 9234 s are synchronized through their extensions in a single task. I would add the NOR-9205 to the chassis and synchronize it with the NOR - 9234 s. I have the following questions:

  1. Calendar synchronization

  How to properly START and the NOR-9205 CLOCK synchronization with the NOR - 9234 s? PXI I export the master St DSA. WHICH device (OR-9234 or NOR-9205) should export WHICH signals to WHOM?

  2. even or parallel task

  Since I produce a TDMS file in its task of NOR - 9234, it would be nice if I could simply to ADD the OR-9205 to this task to develop this unique TDMS with extra 4 channels of the NOR-9205 file. Is this possible?

  Thanks in advance,

  Hi golubovski,

  > Are you saying my task of canal expansion can fire them OR - s and NEITHER-9205 9234 with its 32 channels of multuplexed HAVE? How to recognize which modules can be combined in this way convinient?

  Yes. With the cDAQ-9178, any set of AI modules can be included in the same task and in most cases that apply to the AO and DIO as well, but you cannot mix a, AO and DIO in the same spot. The NOR cDAQ-917 x manual goes into more details on what combinations of modules, the types of channels and the tasks are possible.

  > I am aware since I worked so far with the PXI - 4472 DSAS. How well can correlate between the NI 9234 - and the NI9205?

  Well, I wanted to make sure that you did not know that it is something that you'll probably need to take into account. On the top of my head, I don't know the answer to this question.

  > As far as I know, in which case I use dummy DAQ with the NOR - 9234 to offset 40 clock cycles I guess I'll need to separate the tasks - how to integrate viewers into a single stream of TDMS?

  If you use two separate tasks and you are using the built-in support of DAQmx for TDMS logging, then you will get flow TDMS separated for each task. Note that a dummy read will still record to the PDM file, then maybe it will not work in your case.

  If you use the TDMS API to write to the PDM file, you can do the preliminary processing of data before it is written in a single stream, but there is some trade-off between ease of use and efficiency: either you write data point floating in the file (easier but less effective), or you have to deal with scaling (most effective raw data (, but harder to do).

  Another approach is to put all the modules in the same task and compensate for the delay of the filter after reading the data from the PDM file.

  > Also, for fixed 3.2 µs I have to calculate how many cycles given the actual sampling frequency or is there another method?

  If you filter delay compensation by removing a whole number of data samples, then Yes. However, there are other methods of data processing that can compensate for a number that is not part of the sample clock periods. I don't have a recommendation, but maybe someone else does?

  Brad

• NEITHER 9212 - issues with sampling frequency, number of samples and size of buffer or slowness comes together with thermocouple module

  To begin with, I am very new to labview and unfortunately on that my first task is to build something rather complicated for a project that my company works. Fortunately it is especially followed rather than control critical processes.

  Currently, I have a cDAQ with modules, DI, AO, and TC.

  cDAQ-9133

  NEITHER 9472

  NEITHER 9421

  NEITHER 9263

  NEITHER 9205

  NEITHER 9212

  I'm currently running read-write for all 5 of these modules in parallel while loops and analog and digital inputs/outputs modules that all work as expected. Each loop requires 1 sample per channel through the wizard DAQmx etc for each module and I got can interact with all the asyncronosly inputs and outputs which at the moment is the goal. I can switch power switch for each module save memory, or if the need arrives later.

  My problem is that the module TC (NI 9212) when tilt on which allows the acquisition of sample 1 loop seems to take much, much longer to collect samples. I have played with different acquisition parameters and can seem to get a continuous flow of data when you use streaming samples, or even when specifying N-samples but I come in questions where the "application cannot catch up with the hardware.

  I tried to find an optimal number of samples/sampling, rate, etc I can get an update of temperature more than every 1 to 2 seconds, but if I set the number of samples that are high enough to apparently get a constant flow, what ends up happening waveform graphs seem to lag behind the actual data, and that's where I get errors. I only want 1 sample per channel per cycle anyway. Yet once, all the other modules in the cycle with less than 100ms delay between acquisitions but the module thermocouple ends up being 1-2 seconds. It's okay because in our application temperature should not rise/drop very quickly but its boring nonetheless.

  I have the acquisition set up for the same (NI 9212) thermocouple module was like my modules of analog and digital inputs (NI 9205 and NI 9421) take 1 sample every time the task is called so I'm having a hard time understand why do the same for the TC module introduced such a delay. Max sampling rate is supposed to be 95 samples/s/ch, so I guess that the delay must come from call the task over and over again in a loop.

  Synchronization and how you have configured the 9212?

  In the case of high resolution, it can reach 1.8 samples/s. see page 7 of the plug technique here for rates for the supported modes:

  http://www.NI.com/PDF/manuals/374389a.PDF

  -AK2DM

• Sampling OR 9205 if rate not specified

  Hi all

  I have an application that requires the generation of a binary sequence (for that I use NO-9401). After each number is generated the back are connected to a demultiplexer, each output of the demux generates a voltage I need to acquire with a NEITHER-9205, i.e. after each number is generated, I have to acquire an analog voltage. This process must be very precise. To minimize errors, I take 10 readings of everyvoltage one generate an average. I did like on playback, but my question is the sampling frequency, that is - this determinant the sampling frequency, the time if takes LabVIEW to read the 1Chan analog DBL 1 Samp?

  I also came for a result like on playback 1, however even if the results are correct, start and stop the task each round is not time efficient for my application.

  I use a 9172 chassis.

  Thank you very much for your help

  Hi JosephM,

  Your first photo (Reading.PNG) is using synchronization on demand for the two tasks. This means that DAQmx no entry or exit anything until you call DAQmx Read or DAQmx Write and the timing is entirely controlled by when your VI calls these subVIs. Adding a delay to the loop for will increase the time between the analog input samples, but "timing" software on Windows has a significant amount of jitter (it may delay much longer that you have requested).

  Your second image (read 1.png) uses sample clock calendar instead of synchronization on demand for the analog input. This implies much more accurate analog synchronization because the analog input is synchronized to a sample clock that is generated in the material. However, the digital output is still software timed. You can reduce the time spent in the DAQmx Start on the task to HAVE by calling DAQmx task Control (Commit) out of the loop. This will cause DAQmx book and partially program AI material once instead of once per loop execution.

  Should you precise timing? If so, you must be material too timed the digital output. The cDAQ-9172 supports load/s digital correlated in slots 1-4, which is hardware timed digital i/o using a clock source external sample (or a sampling of another subsystem clock, as AI/SampleClock or Ctr0InternalOutput). To use it, you will need to generate a matrix or a form containing digital models, you want to output waveform and in this table or the waveform, you will control the timing by repeating samples. A few screws example that should you started: dig write metered DAQmx/Digital/generate values/Correlated and DAQmx/Digital/generate values/write dig Chan-Ext CLK.

  Note that the cDAQ-9172 has two internal counter on the chassis channels that are useful for generating clock for digital I/o correlated examples: / cDAQ1/_ctr0 and/cDAQ1/_ctr1. These appear in the channel physical control e/s if you right click and select «IO name filtering...» "and check the box"internal channels.

  If you synchronize your DIO directly to your HAVE, you may need to insert additional examples of and throw the first samples of AI in order to take account of the time that it takes your demux to settle. If you continue to use avoiding the, you may need to insert a break from software to account for the waiting time.

  Is the electric line (60 Hz or 50 Hz) noise a problem? The sample rate and the number of samples can affect how well your average eliminates electrical line noise. Plu signal advanced such as windowing can help.

  Brad

• cRIO-9025 is not recognized in MAX

  I have the cRIO-9025 controller connected directly to the computer, but it is not recognized in MAX.

  I tried to manually add the IP address, but that does not work either.

  I've disabled most of the virus protection software and added to the exceptions in the firewall for the software OR.

  I am running Version MAX 5.0.0f1

  cRIO-9025 with

  • NEITHER 9205
  
  
  • NEITHER 9208
  
  
  • NEITHER 9214 (x 2)
  
  
  • NEITHER 9401
  
  
  • NEITHER 9411
  
  
  • NEITHER 9485
  
  
  • NEITHER 9512

  What type of network are you on? Is it a computer University (I'm trying to understand why you can't change the settings of the firewall)? You can add measurement and Automation Explorer as an exception? You can add UDP 44525 as an exception? Another thing you can do to really tell if it is a firewall problem is to try another computer with a different firewall configuration (but with the same driver of RIO) to see if the cRIO is detected it. It looks like, based on my experience that something prevents MAX to communicate to your target. Your cRIO has an IP address? If so have you tried it ping via the command prompt. To get the IP address (of the kind that you can ping), you can use embedded in the cRIO out console.

  

• Accelerometer for several modules in a cRIO

  Dear all,

  I try to connect my model 805M 1 accelerometer (form is attached) to one of our cRIOs in lab, I think I need some advice because we have two cRIOs and bunch of modules I want to use them instead of buying another module. We have these controllers and modules:

  NEITHER cRIO-9073

  NEITHER cRIO-9024

  NEITHER 9265

  NEITHER 9237

  NEITHER 9205

  NEITHER 9203

  I think I can excite (he needs 3 v to 5.5 v) the acceleremoter with for example NI 9237 and read it with NI 9205. Am wrong me or is there another combination that I can use?

  I appreciate your help.

  Best,

  Bardiya

  BAK777,

  Yes, you can use the NI 9237 module to provide the voltage using a custom voltage customized by excitement and ignore the input data for this task. You can read in the output voltage of your accelerometer on the NI 9205 module.

  According to the characteristics of the accelerometer signal, it might be useful to research using an Analyzer of dynamic signals (DSA) module, such as the NI 9234, which is made for the acquisition of accelerometer data applications.

• stand alone compact rio

  Hi to everyone!

  I am a student of the University and for my thesis, I use a COMPACT RIO with neither 9205 and gps module, some measures aboard an eletric car, measures will be saved to a TDMS file in the RIO COMPACT by a stand alone configuration and without connection to a pc.

  The compact rio will begins with the car and it will go off with him also.
  So I have a question, how can I stop the VI within the CRIO before turning off the car?  or in TDMS data will be saved in the same way without close the VI within the CRIO before turning off the car?

  Thank you

  Hello antoniolc!

  There is no way of knowing inside CompactRIO, if the system will be shut down.

  You must use an external signal to find out when your car will be stopped.

  Or you can use a multiple TDMS file and like it, just the last TDMS file will be unreadable. But you can probably read all previous TDMS files.

  Best regards.

• DAQmx does not recognize the NI 9213 TC module

  Hello

  I'm quite new to LabView and just tried to set up the system.

  We use a cRIO-9022 controller real time with a cRio 9114.

  DAQmx recognizes the real time controller, but not TC (NI 9213) module and all other modules

  (NEITHER 9205, 9421, 9472).

  Can't simulate these devices in DAQmx (V 9.0).

  Moreover, that meant exactly by time real target?

  Thanks for your help

  Patrick

  Hi Patrick,

  The cRIO chassis is programmed with LabVIEW FPGA and the pilot of RIO and is in fact not supported by DAQmx.

  For some more information, I suggest through Getting Started with CompactRIO and LabVIEW.

  Best regards

• Is it possible to collect data from two separate modules of cDAQ NOR while game mode "continuous sampling?

  I am using a cDAQ with NI 9237 module and one NEITHER 9205 and LabVIEW 8.6.1. The two arecoded of modules using the DAQ Assistant in LabVIEW.

  I would like to simultaneously read data guarantee of deformation (NI 9237) and data LVDT (NOR 9205) in order to operate a piece of equipment from laboratory to different load profiles. However, when I try to run the VI with two Assistants DAQ continuous sampling value, I get an error saying that the 'resources are not available."

  To work around this problem, I tried to have both alternate between taking a series of samples. This method is insufficient, as it produces choppy data that controls a machine cannot be invoked.

  Sorry if the words I have used are not good. I'm kinda new to labVIEW.

  Thank you

  I assume you are using cDAQ-9172 chassis.

  This was just an analog input synchronization engine, which means that only HAVE task can run at a time.

• Compatibility with windows 64 bit OS

  Hi, we intend to upgrade our current computer, possibly to a multicore 64-bit with windows OS. Currently, we use C++ as a software platform on a 32-bit Windows XP for the following devices:

  PCI-6534

  PCI 6713

  PCI-6071E

  NEITHER 9205

  USB 6501

  Most of them use NIDAQmx as drivers of base level. These devices are compatible with OS (win 7) 64-bit?

  Thank you

  I have not checked all of your devices are covered, but you should start to look at here and here.