NETGEAR ProSafe VPN Firewall SRXN3205 and port forwarding?

Similar Questions

• VPN site to Site with NAT and Port forwarding on a 871

  Hello

  Could someone please look at the config 871 router attached and tell me where I'm wrong!

  VPNs all work, work, BUT anyone trying to connect to a port that is sent through the VPN port forwarding fails.

  In the config attached Port 3389 (RDP) is sent to an internal server, if you connect to the external interface Internet connection is made and it works well, but if someone tries to connect to the IP address internal to that same server through VPN, it does not.

  We've added commands to stop working on the lines VPN NAT, but these do not seem to work.

  What Miss me?

  Thank you in advance and I will adjudicate all useful responses.

  It is a common problem. Yes you added controls to prevent NAT to work above the tunnel, but your static nat port to port 3389 takes precedence over the generic nat command, and there not all orders top to prevent it is nat would be above the tunnel.

  I wrote an example configuration for this some time, see here for more details:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094634.shtml

  If all goes well, he explains everything. Note that it is for a general order static host, not a static port that you have, but the concept is exactly the same. Just add a statement roadmap on the end of your static command of the port, and this route map - will reference an ACL that denies are used when going up above the tunnel.

• VPN and port forwarding problem

  Hello

  I configured a VPN (IPSec) between 2 sites on Cisco 881 - K9.

  The server 'A', which the 192.168.0.X address must be accessible on port 80, 8080 and 90 of the public network.

  I have configured the ports of shipment with the command:

  IP nat inside source static TCP 192.168.0.X 90 interface fastethernet 4 90

  IP nat inside source static TCP 192.168.0.X 80 4 80 fastethernet interface

  IP nat inside source static TCP 8080 interface fastethernet 4 8080 192.168.0.X

  The server is accessible from the outside, the site in which it is located.

  But there is a problem with the second site:

  • I ping the server with its local address 192.168.0.X
  • But when I try to open a Web page that is using port 80 or 8080 or 90, the server appears inaccessible

  It seems that the problem is due to the translation of port because when I delete the configuration of port forwarding is no problem over on the second site.

  Thanks for your help

  Hello

  You need conditional NAT.
  When you want to Port Forwarding to work just for a part of traffic, e.g. when access to the server from the Internet
  but not for traffic entering via VPN, you can add a roadmap to the end.

  Thus,.
  IP nat inside source static TCP 192.168.0.X PUBLIC_IP 4 xx xx map route VPN

  The road map tells when it is NAT that will to spend.
  It will always happen, but when traffic is coming from the VPN.

  Now... the problem is that you can add a roadmap, when you have a rule of Port forwarding to an IP address (and not an interface).

  Anyway, give it a try and let us know.

  Federico.

• RV220W and Port forwarding

  Hello

  I have a problem with my Cisco RV220W with Firmware 1.0.3.5

  I have in my local network a Dreambox with the IP 192.168.1.230, he listen Port 8880.

  How can I implement a WAN port forwarding to the Dreambox?

  Thank you

  Michael

  Hi Michael,

  Thank you for posting. Please follow the steps below to transfer the port to your Dreambox:

  1. Log in to the router, then go to: Firewall-> Access Control-Services > custom.
  2. Press 'Add' and then type Dreambox name, TCP for type. The Port of departure and Port of finish will be 8880. Press "Save".
  3. Go to the IPv4 firewall rules and press 'Add '. Use the following settings:

  Area: No reliable (WAN)

  Area: Trust (LAN)

  Service: Dreambox

  Action: Always allow the

  Source host: no

  Send to the Local (DNAT IP) server: type the address LAN IP of the Dreambox here device (i.e. 192.168.1.150)

  Ignore the other settings on this page and press 'Save' at the bottom. You should now be able to reach the Dreambox from the Web using: 8880

  Please let us know if it works or if you need further assistance.

• Need help with the implementation of a VPN to bypass the port forwarding to access my web server

  Pretty much as the title suggests, but it's probably not clear enough. Let me explain:
  I want to host a Web site on my computer. Not another major, but something small and private.

  Before you set up a domain name, I want to make sure the site works - which it is not.
  I am currently using WAMPServer to organize it all.

  I put it so when I connect to localhost, I have access to all my files in the directory, regardless of whether or not I'm "online" or "offline" on WAMPServer (or not, others will have access to my Web page).

  When I turn WAMPServer 'on-line', it allows the connection of my WAMPServer homepage through both localhost and connection through the static IP address, I put in place, but only in LAN, meaning that only computers connected to my home network would have access to the page.

  My router cannot be configured to allow port forwarding for can I open a port to allow redirection to my computer, rather than the ambiguous router itself. As an alternative, I downloaded Hamachi to allow a computer to connect to the VPN (Hamachi) and, by extension, my IP for access to files in the directory.

  In theory, it should work, but it didn't. In my local network computers could still connect to the IP address, but the computer in the virtual private network, but not on the local network could not.

  Is there something I'm missing here, or is there any suggestions to make this work?

  Note:
  My works of static IP as what it is, however, it is different from the IP address used in Hamachi. If I change the IP address used by my computer to access the site to the IP address that uses my Hamachi, would that work? As another suggestion, can I change my static IP setting is automatic and change one used on WAMPServer (from localhost, allowing the connection to bring) than on Hamachi? Or I do all three IP addresses the same?

  Thanks for all the help and solutions,
  Elgo

  Domain/server/business questions are best addressed @ Technet.  Answers is more connected consumer.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/

• Question about WRT54G2 and port forwarding

  Recently, I replaced my WRT54G with a new WRT54G2. My old router had the port forwarding for 2 pc is as follows:

  192.168.1.100

  6073 - UDP port

  2302-2303-TCP port

  192.168.1.101

  2302-2400-UDP

  6073 - at once

  8085 - at once

  TCP port 26100-26110

  27100-27110-both

  When I try to set up my new router, it says I have overlapping of ports. Maybe I'm confused but how could he have been working on my old router and now it does not work on my new?

  Of course, try this, and I think I could solve your problem.

• RV130W - Firewall locks? Port forwarding no longer works!

  Hey all,.

  I have a Cisco RV130W router, which seems to have problems with the Port Forwarding type stuff.  Port forwarding is without a doubt done properly (as I did on all other RV130W) and the ports actually work for a few hours or maybe more, but then it's like she goes down on the lock and blocks all traffic that passes through.

  My solution is to reboot the router for port forwarding works again.

  I can't access management "distance" more when this happens.  I can access the Web Interface via LAN and Internet and network continues to operate correctly - DHCP and all.

  I'm under the new firmware.

  Any ideas?  Thank you!

  Hello Jeff,.

  Sorry the camera does not work as expected.  I have seen this problem before and I think that you would see if you were doing a capture of packets across the Wan is the router receives a SYN, but never respond with a SYN ACK.  We have found a workaround is to, I suspect that you have single port forwarding enabled, try to configure the same ports in the range of port forwarding page.  Configure the ports of departure and end in the same port number, and remove the single port forwarding configuration.  I hope this helps.

• WRT160N V3 DMZ and Port-Forwarding does not work

  Hi all

  I have a V3 WRT160N and DMZ or Portforwarding do not work.

  I tried on locally

  WAN_PC-> WAN - PORT-> WRT160N V3-> LOCAL - PORT-> LOCAL_PC

  The WAN_PC has a static IP 192.168.1.2, subnet 255.255.255.0

  The WAN PORT has a static IP 192.168.1.1, subnet 255.255.255.0

  ON the WRT160N V3, I set up a DMZ on 192.168.0.100.and off the firewall.

  On the LOCAL_PC (192.168.0.100:8888) is an Apache

  So when I type 192.168.1.1:8888 on the WAN_PC I get NOOO the Apache on 192.168.0.100:8888 Web site?

  WHY??????????????

  Please correct me if I'm wrong. My understanding of your installation, it is that you have a computer connected to the internet port of the router and another computer connected to the router's ethernet port? Is this correct? You don't have a modem for internet connection or something like that? If you can post here a diagram that will be better. Thank you.

• NetGear ProSafe VPN client (6.12.001) fails after latest version 10 of Windows update (FVS336Gv2)

  
  

  Rokhaya, all,.

  Windows most recent system update (KB 3124200) solved the problem NetGear VPN for me.

  For no matter what Windows major release (since 8.1), be sure to repeat the following steps:

  1. disable the IKEEXT service

  2 re-install NetGear

  Good luck!

  -Jelena

• ASA 5510 more and Port forwarding

  Hallo,

  I don't know if the thread title is correctly written, so I'll try to explain my problem.

  I have an ASA 5510 more linking several external interface VPN tunnels to internal interface. they work very well. Now I want to access a server in the internal network of trust on the Internet via RDP.

  I've set up a static NAT rule which translates by [my public ip phone]: 11111 on [the internal server ip]: 3389. Moreover, I met [my public ip phone] traffic: 11111 outside [the internal server ip]: 3389 inside via the access control list.

  Yes, it does not. I made a few soft logic error?

  Code:

  static (exterior, Interior) [the internal server ip] tcp 3389 [my laptop public ip] 11111 netmask 255.255.255.255

  Outside_access_in list extended access permit tcp host [my ip public notebook] [internal server ip] eq 3389

  Best regards

  EYAD Tayeb.

  Hi... I might have a word here!

  looking at your config you have

  static (inside, outside) tcp 3389 11111 netmask 255.255.255.255

  It should be

  static (inside, outside) of the tcp 3389 3389 netmask 255.255.255.255 interface

  Also... Make sure that the aplpied of the access list for the external interface in the outbound direction does not block traffic referred by your inside host with the public client that initiated the RDP session.

  I hope this helps... Please, write it down if she does!

• vpn port forward?

  Hey everybody,

  Here's the situation, I have a sidewinder firewall right behind a Cisco 2811 router. The router has an external public IP address, so it offered a NAT overload (PAT). I want to allow users to connect to my network using a vpn ipsec to the firewall. Due to design issues, I can't put the firewall directly on the Internet. Now, here is my question I have to port before the router's ipsec vpn firewall? And now, the question of the great rookie if I need to port-forward how can I do this?

  Thanks for the help,

  Andrew

  Andrew,

  I don't know if the firewall supports forwarding port or how to do it, but you will need to redirect

  UDP 500 port

  ESP IP protocol

  UDP port 4500

  So, if it's a cisco device, you create a rule to forward ports above to the internal firewall of port forwarding.

  To do port forwarding in the router you do:

  IP nat inside source udp static x.x.x.x interface 500 500

  IP nat inside source udp static x.x.x.x interface 4500 500

  IP nat inside source static esp x.x.x.x interface

  Federico.

• RVS4000 Port forwarding

  I have a RVS4000 put in place as my internet router/gateway to a client of 75 MS Server 2003 network. All network devices receive a static IP address. I used Port Forwarding and Port Range Forwarding on the RVS4000 to allow remote desktop connection to outside network to specific clients within the network. I have used all available space on the RVS4000 software for the seizure of the Port addresses and still needed to connect multiple users more. I bought a second RVS4000 and connected to the first through one of the lan ports, then the network through another lan port.  I have forwarded a range of addresses of the first router to another and then used the second router port forwarding and port forwarding tables range to the IP addresses of each client. Everything seems to be set up correctly and I can access both routers on the network, the individual port forwarding and the addresses of forwarding port on the first router range still work, but the transmitted address range appear not to be through to the second router and then to the customers. What I am doing wrong?

  I think the WRVS4400N has an IP based ACL that you can do to open the ports of the PC. It has a capacity of 1 G more but I don't know if the ACL can handle 25-50 PCs. I suggest you try to contact CISCO technical support so that you can be well informed of the router you need to make it work.

• Unable to do port forwarding, to connect to the VPN and install Windows updates

  first of all, I tried to launch a minecraft Server trying to port forward, had problems with this, so I tried Hamachi, wouldn't connect to the VPN, then I tried Tunngle, at least, it was more useful, so I tried to use Device Manager to search for tunngle found when trying to manually install it, then he said that he could not or invaild something (or something of the sort) then it says windows may need to be put updated to fix this problem, so I tried to update to windows and it will not be updated, he is stuck at 0%, I tried the thing to download the patch to update windows and that has not helped,): I DO

  Original title: Windows Update will not be blocked at 0%

  Hello

  Thanks for posting your query in Microsoft Community.

  Depending on your problem troubleshooting to establish a VPN connection, I recommend that you post your question in the TechNet forums. TechNet is watched by other computing professionals who would be more likely to help you.

  TechNet Forum

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Windows/en-us/home?category=w8itpro

  Hope this information is useful.

• RV042 Port forwarding stops working when the firewall is turned on

  Hey all,.

  I have an on a single WAN RV042 router and internal network. I have configured port forwarding as follows:

  HTTP[TCP/80~80]->10.0.0.6
  HTTPS[TCP/443~443]->10.0.0.6
  IMAP[TCP/143~143]->10.0.0.5
  IMAP SSL[TCP/993~993]->10.0.0.5
  SSL[TCP/587~587]->10.0.0.5 SMTP

  Everything works fine when I have the firewall turned OFF. However, when I enable the behavior is erratic. 1 of 10 attempts to connect to ANY port transmitted works. Almost all attempts at expiration time.

  Note that this happens even if you only use the default firewall rules (which must be circumvented by the port translation I've read in other posts).

  My second try was to create rules to Firewall manually, the substitution of the value default ones. I tried to add source WAN1 rules (where is my connection) to the ONE and UNIQUE IP on each port. Nothing seems to work.

  I don't know what I'm doing wrong, it's really bugging me. I had to disable the firewall if we can access our servers from outside the office. It shouldn't have to do.

  Do you know what I might try?

  Best regards

  Theo

  Hello.

  These products are processed by the Cisco Small Business Support Community.

  * If my post answered your question, please mark it as "acceptable Solution".

  Thank you!

• The ASA with crossed VPN Port forwarding

  Hello

  I worked on a question for a while and I have managed to track down the issue, but I don't know how to solve the problem.

  I have an ASA 5505 8.4 (7) running with a tunnel for incoming remote users anyconnect vpn. I also want to configure incoming Web server port forwarding.

  The question seems to be traversed rule which stops incoming port forwarding:

  NAT (outside, outside) NETWORK_OBJ_172.16.1.0_28 interface description dynamic source hairpin to natting users vpn on the external interface

  When I disable the port forwarding will work perfectly (according to tracer packet that is).

  I have attached the config to this post. I would appreciate any idea how to get the through VPN and the transfer to the incoming port working.

  The config has been condensed to remove unneed config.

  Thank you

  Hello

  What is the configuration commands, you use to put in place the static PAT (Port Forward)?

  The problem is most likely order of the NAT configurations such as configuring NAT above in the upper part of the NAT configurations.

  Configuring static PAT, that you could use to make it work would be

  the SERVER object network

  host

  service object WWW

  tcp source eq www service

  NAT (server, on the outside) of the interface to the static SERVER 1 source WWW WWW service

  The above assumes the source for the host interface is "Server" and the service that you want to PAT static TCP/80.

  Note that we add the number '1' in the 'nat' command. This will add at the top. The same should be done for any other static PAT you configure you want for these VPN Clients.

  Hope this helps

  -Jouni