Network - high CPU load problem

Similar Questions

• Satellite P300-212 - system causes the periodic high CPU load

  Windows Vista Edition Home Premium (OEM) on the Toshiba Satellite P300-212

  Even on a system Windows freshly installed (from recovery DVDs), the system process (PID 4, NT Kernel & System) causes on a regular basis (every five minutes) a CPU load high for a few seconds, during which the system hangs, not even the mouse pointer can be moved.
  Sysinternals Process Explorer identifies the thread of high load as "ntkrnlpa.exe! ExfTryAcquirePushLockShared + 0 x 15 2 "with the thread ID 20 or 24.

  Does anyone have an explanation for this behavior or a solution to the problem?

  Hey,.

  If you have installed Windows recovery disk Toshiba but still high CPU usage? Hmm that's strange because this image is tested by Toshiba

  Have you installed or uninstalled any software or tools?
  I uninstall the current antivirus and disable some start up programs you n t need in msconfig. Usually, this should work.

• [MSD] High CPU load of Java

  Hello

  One of my colleagues has a problem with the CPU load high caused by the process of java under the wrapper, it uses the latest version of TMS 13.2.2 with TMSPE, the server running Server 2008 R2 Enterprise, 4 GB RAM, 64-bit java (9) was last updated was applied, to no avail.

  The process of java on my TMS system runs at 0.54% avg, the only difference I see is the amount of RAM, its user base is tiny (80 users).

  Any suggestions on what he can try to diagnose the problem?

  

  Hi you use findme?

  You can check if the address of the video template is the same as the address of device model?

  In the diagnostics of tmspe can also see if the importation of the aircraft has a work «»
  Circle on it as his performs a constant import?

  If you do not use findme, disable it on tms tmspe settings and restart the tmspe service. The cpu is now stable?

  / Magnus

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• 100% high CPU load and memory usage

  Hi all

  My company bought a new appliance IPS 4510 and after initial installation, I see that the CPU load and memory is 100%. The device is not in a production network. Is this normal or there is a hardware problem? Enjoy a Counselor about it.

  Concerning

  Christine

  Hi Damien,.

  It is actually normal behavior for an IPS sensor.

  To measure the actual load of an IPS sensor, you will want to monitor the "percentage load treatment" of the analytical engine that processes all inspection processing for the sensor.

  You can view these statistics by using the command 'display the scan statistics-engine '.

  Also, the sensor running version 7.0000 E4 5,0000 E4 (or later version), you can check the load percentage value Inspection displayed by the command "Display inspection-load" in its place.

  Hope that answers your query.

  Cyril Shankar

• setInterval - CPU loading problem

  I have a Flash application to completion, I am about to enter its first pilot site - then do the test alpha with a few members of the family...
  
  Everything works fine but my son tests threw upward a CPU loadind weird question - I'll try to explain...
  
  In the part of my Ap I use lineto to draw shapes on the screen with sets of coordinates, pre loaded into tables. I charge setInterval with a different millisecond value to change the speed of drawing of such forms and then whenever it is called, he picks up a new coordinate in the table and the lines to that. Once an incremented counter reaches the end of the table, I erase the current setInterval and pick up a new set of coords and begine. Each set of coords is about 100 pairs of value to ._x, ._y
  
  The issue is that on long distances, more than 5 or 6 sets of coordinates, with values of low millisecond in setInterval (say 10-15) the CPU loading people gets more along the sequence, effectively limiting the animation once the download on the CPU gets higher than 80%
  
  In my eyes - the effort to draw the shape 8 in a sequence must be the same as that necessary to attract the first - but is clearly not what happens in practice, I also checked CPU loading with the highest values of millisecond by slower speeds - and here also the CPU load increases, but not as dramatically.
  
  Memory usage doesn't just increase CPU are so clearly there thing being left running - all pointers to where I should look at to solve this, would be very welcome...
  
  TIA
  
  Nigel

  Guys - I just put a clooge in my code to break down 10 movieclips instead of a big easy coz a drawing - I already had movieclips on the stage in places - right and on my DELL 5 year, the animation runs at a constant speed and is never above 8% CPU load!

  So I call it fixed - well, when I sort out all the other consiquences of change - might even be able to get out in the garden on Sunday now!

  Thanks for poking me in the right direction

  Nigel

• Q180 high CPU usage problem

  My new Q180 shows CPU usage by at least 40% all the time in the Windows 7 Task Manager. Sysinternals Process Explorer show that this is due to more than 25% of material interruptions happening all the time.

  Everyone sees these problems / symptoms?

  
  

• command prompt and high cpu utilization problems

  I have an Acer Aspire laptop. Windows 7-64 bit. My CPU usage has been quite erratic for months. She sometimes becomes up to 4 or 5%, but most of the time, he is running between 50 and 100% (I have a counter on my desk). I've been running all kinds of tools and cleaning methods. I had McAfee antivirus for a prior year of minimal, but renewed problems a few months ago and found strange and annoying that he wouldn't be updated every day while I was working. I assumed something was wrong with her, so I replaced it with a program that I got for free with another purchase from Best Buy... Trend Micro, I think it was called. Well, it appeared that Trend Micro used more process and CPU than McAfee. At that time, I thought it would be safer and cleaner for Microsoft Security Essentials TM trade. I also have CCleaner installed and I run it every other day or two. I also run r-kill and tdsskiller a few times but never found something dangerous. I removed everything that I felt uncomfortable unused programs were safe to remove. The last thing that I see and which seems odd to me is that, at startup, a "command prompt" icon will appear briefly in my taskbar and then quickly go to 'start' 'recent '... I have never seen this before so it seems weird, like a clue any. Also in the last few days, usually online, but also with Solitair Windows offline. Either the cursor will freeze or the screen freezes making useless cursor, even for a moment, and sometimes I'll just "end task." I'm not a gamer, I mainly watch movies and videos... Try, anyway! Thanks in advance for the help!

  Wow you're gluten for punishment than TrendMicro Mcafee Ouch

  You did use less uninstallation of Mcafee?

  http://service.McAfee.com/FAQDocument.aspx?ID=TS101331

  You can get trendmicro from Mcafee here too

  http://www.SevenForums.com/system-security/151276-instructions-tools-remove-residual-anti-virus-programs.html

  Personally, I use Panda free and Premium of Malwarebytes.

• High CPU load of FSX

  I have a FSX Acceleration. Whenever I run the FSX, the CPU always hit at least 60% (sometimes even at full load) on all 4 cores (I changed to use the 4 hearts somewhere in the config). For this reason, my CPU temp is around 70-95°C during my GPU temp is not 55°C. My question is, is there a way to reduce the CPU usage to 50% or less for the entire game? Is it possible to move the CPU to the GPU still load?

  Spec:

  Processor - Intel Core i5-2500 running at default clock

  RAM - 8 GB

  Hard Drive-WD Blue 500 GB

  GPU - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550Ti by Gigabyte

  Motherboard - GA-P75-D3

  Hi Frank,.

  Check if the operations since the next thread is useful.

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/Windows_7-gaming/Microsoft-Flight-Simulator-x-CPU-overusage-error/56106f93-5742-4005-b3ea-cb21d2b91efb

  CHKDSK warning:

  Important: When running chkdsk on the drive if bad sectors are found on the disk hard when chkdsk attempts to repair this area if all available on which data can be lost.

• High CPU load on Oracle when executing select on TT

  Hello. I have grid cache: 2 instances of global TT + Oracle with async dynamic writing group of cache on a single table with 1 million entries. Each instance of grid cache is located on its own host. I start the execution performance test only on instances of TT SELECT queries. Now, I see that the process Oracle starts consuming a lot of time CPU. According to the documentation (if I understand correctly) all db readings are performed between instances of TT. That fact Oracle when I run select TT? In case that we to scale horizontally by adding instances TT Oracle doesn't become a bottleneck?

  A few points:

  1 data movement between grid mnodes requires that we update some informaiton in oracle (via the replication agent). Thi is probably what is causimng load you see you on Oracle.

  2. a load of work that creates a lot of data movement will not run and will not well. This isn't a good way to use the grid of the cache. You should 'soft partition' workload
  so that the connections on a member of the grid work preferentially on a (mostly) disjoint subset of data compoared connctions to members of grid President.

  3. If you plan to work intensively with grid you hould reallly use the latest major version (11.2.2) not old enough now 11.2.1. There has been many improvements,
  bug fixes etc since 11.2.1.8.0.

  Chris

• BT stack file TosBTMng.Exe generates 100% of CPU load

  I am also facing the problem that the Toshiba Bluetooth Manager (TosBtMng.exe) very often starts a loop and causes a 100% CPU load.

  This has happened with older versions of the Toshiba Bluetooth stack and the current version (5.1.0.12).

  The affected system is a Tecra S1, BT-Modul and Windows XP SP2.

  BT battery installation went well and the laptop starts succesfull while BT is enabled. I also checked for hidden COM-Ports and other tips in this forum, without success.

  Blocking seems to occur at different times. Sometimes just after are restarted, by clicking on the tray icon of BT with the right button of the mouse. Then the context menu is shown all too the white box, no entries. He can also try to connect to a device already associated. If I kill the process with the Task Manager, I can restart and he continues to work for a while.

  As found in another thread here, I enabled the registration of the API of the Bluetooth Manager and found the following when connecting with the Nokia PC Suite for my mobile phone:

  Call the 00042519 21:55:05 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042520 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042521 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2: InitCOMPort = COM6, CreateCOMPort = COM23
  00042522 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall: send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000036 (54)
  00042523 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
  00042524 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000028 (40)
  00042525 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
  00042526 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetLocalInfo()
  00042527 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BtGetLocalInfo2: entry Paramers / pLocalBtDeviceInfo = 00D9FE8C, plStatus = 00D9FE84
  00042528 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall: send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00001000 (4096), Size = 00000030 (48)
  00042529 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
  00042530 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00001000 (4096), Size = 0000003F (63)
  00042531 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
  00042532 21:56:17 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetRemoteDeviceList2()

  A new COM port is created successfully (COM23) and a few seconds later the CPU of TosBtMng load goes up to 100%, but no API calls are made. And if you wait long enough the phone are connected and data can be transferred. However, very slowly.

  Probably because of the high CPU load a next port COM (COM24) will be created some time later and this process is then repeated once again:

  00042740 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
  00042741 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008007 (32775), Size = 00000041 (65)
  00042742 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
  Call the 00042743 21:56:47 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042744 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042745 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2: InitCOMPort = COM6, CreateCOMPort = COM24
  00042746 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall: send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000036 (54)
  00042747 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI (BOOL) = 0
  00042748 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData: receipt COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber = 00008000 (32768), Size = 00000028 (40)
  00042749 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
  00042750 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetCOMMInfoList2()
  Call the 00042751 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042752 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  Call the 00042753 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042754 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  Call the 00042755 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042756 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  Call the 00042757 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042758 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  Call the 00042759 21:57:52 [7208] (TosBtAPI / PCCSTBTP) BtCreateCOMM()-> BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042760 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtCreateCOMM2()
  00042761 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetLocalInfo()
  00042762 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI (PCCSTBTP)] call BtGetLocalInfo()

  Maybe this allows to locate the origin of the problem CPU load of the Bluetooth Manager.

  Thank you
  Gerhard

  How your com port configuration look like?
  Please compare with the DeviceManager screenshot from the following Web site:
  http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/Bluetooth/?page=FAQ/bluetoothnotworking

• VI causes CPU load after several days of running

  Hello

  I have a strange problem. I have craeted a control test VI bench and it runs on five computers, five test of control systems. All PCs have almost the same hardware, same card mother, same processor, etc.

  Normally the CPU load is around 50% when I run the VI, but to a PC, CPU load goes up to 85% after several days (maybe a week) market continues and the PC is almost tied up - VI execution becomes very slow (10 times slower) and the mouse moves only very slowly.

  I have first thought that the PC has a problem, but the problem disappears as soon as I stop and restart the VI!

  I don't even have to put an end to LabVIEW - only my VI and then all is well again.

  The problem does not occur in the other four PC, but I can't say for sure.

  The Task Manager indicates that LabVIEW causes CPU - use swap file load is small.

  Is it possible to analyse the causes of high CPU load?

  I use LabVIEW 7.1 Professional

  Operating system: Win XP (SP 2 or 3 that I can't remember)

  P.S. I have no loops without waiting-functions.

  johanneshoer wrote:

  ...

  the PC where the problem is occurring only 2 x 512 GB RAM, others have 2 x 1 GB. Maybe I have the upgrade of RAM would be my first action...

  ...

  Assuming that it's a typo problem, is you have run out of memory physics and are returning to the virtual (which is 1000 X) slower than real memory.

  Christian has nailed.

  Ben

• problem with high CPU usage audiodg.exe

  While playing the game, I get a message saying that I raised the CPU usage 99% of the base. This is caused by "audiodg.exe. I tried a few bugs that I found online. I was told that they would not work with my computer. I have a Dell XPS15 second-generation i5. Has anyone experience this problem?

  Hello

  1. what you did to solve the problem?

  audiodg.exe [Windows Audio Device Graph Isolation] file hosts the audio engine for Vista and Window s 7.

  All DSP [Digital Signal Processing] and audio processing is done within this file. Suppliers are able to install their own audio effects and DSP in the audio pipeline, which is then processed by audiodg.exe

  In order to correct the high CPU usage, disable audio enhancements addressed by the file audiodg.exe. To disable the audio improvements, follow these steps:
  a. right click on the speaker in the lower corner icon right.

  b. Select the playback device from the menu. A list of devices should appear on the screen.

  c. double-click the device that has a green check mark. The properties for the device windows should open.

  d. click the improvements at the top.

  e. in the list of improvements, uncheck all the, or check Disable all improvements.

  f. click on the OK button to save your changes and close the window.

  g. click OK to close the devices window of reading.

  I would also say that you use resource monitor to monitor the CPU usage.

  Resource monitor is a tool that allows you to analyze the use of the CPU, disk, network, and memory in real time.

  You can use the performance tab in the Manager of tasks to see how the CPU of your computer is used by Windows and other programs running on your computer.

  Reference:

  See use of CPU utilization and other performance information

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/view-CPU-utilization-and-other-performance-information

• Tecra M2 - stop hard on high CPU (turns off with no BSOD)

  Experienced stops consistent when the CPU is running at full during a little while.
  -J' mean 'stops' complete power cut with no blue screen of death where all is lost and the computer must be restarted manually.
  -by "high CPU", I mean when the processor locks to full use such that when you insert a column in a big Excel sheet with errors or if you want a large number of files and you open a video from the network or when you run a registry scan and antivirus analysis at the same time.

  The problem took place regularly for a few months and I can now make a case with greater predictability. Using the hardware monitor suite 'Everest', it seems that the problem occurs when the temperature of the CPU is located at 99 for more than a minute or more.

  This happens with some, but never when batteries run - then attempts to force the error, it will not be stopped if the power cable is released just before the drop point.

  In the cases of the problem, it seems to be a small error message appearing only a fraction of a second before the death of the computer.

  Each reference forum and help that I read would suggest the problem is related material and that the chip or the motherboard is overheating and need replacement. While the laptop is almost 18 months old, I bought a new ' everything except the screen and HDD "earlier this year, and was not prepared to accept the explanation without more tests.

  Kantonix Linux works very well and the CD starts seems to tax the processor as much as the same events that kill for me under XP.

  A few weeks back, I installed Windows XP on a second HARD drive in the Bay of hotswappable and noted the installation seems to work pretty hot computer and he died during the process. It has experienced no difficulties for while but, a few days after moving the HARD drive reinstalled in the primary position and after you have reinstalled a lot a lot of applications, the error started happening again.

  Last night I caught a few fractions of a second before the death, the pulling power and stop the process and allow me to see the error message (as mentioned above):

  -first message came from "TOSHIBA Power Saver" saying "a fatal error occurred at x 06" (not sure about the last bit) ".

  -second message was "THotkey.exe' saying 'could not load powrprof.dll.

  -monitoring of several hundred cases of the second message.

  Because of the error messages, I was not able to get a print screen.

  Solutions or even on ideas that would be very appreciated!

  Post edited by: DC-financial

  Hello

  According to your explanations and the information in your ad, I think that the problem is related to the software.
  You wrote something about energy saving. This Toshiba utility controls the speed of the CPU and the use of cooling modules.
  I think that this request could be responsible by the judgments. Try reinstalling this utility.
  In addition, check the configuration of the unique power plans. If you work only with battery energy saver using another mode of power supply as working on AC.
  I think you could check these consumption patterns and configure it.

  Verification of the cooling module is also not a bad idea. Maybe fans cannot work properly because of the dust and debris inside the books.
  I use the vacuum cleaner to clean the fans. CA? s an easy way to make it free of dust.
  But if you get it, you must be careful.

• Windows 7 update - slow download, svchost high CPU usage

  I have a problem downloading by using the Windows Update application. This problem started after January 2016.  In the past, the request of update seems to work without the use of the svchost high CPU and with a reasonable download time.  There is usually a delay until the download has started, but then they ended quickly.

  I have 4 computers: 3 running Windows 7 Pro (CPU - Intel dual, i5 & i7) and 1 running Windows 7 Home (Intel i3).  If the problem is not related to the CPU hardware as best I can tell.

  My update setting is 'check for updates but let me download and install ".

  The Windows Update process includes 3 steps:
  1. identify the important and recommended updates for your computer.
  2. the selection and download updates.
  3. the creation of the restore point and of the installation, the selected updates.

  My problem is step 2, download the selected updates.  This happens on all 4 systems, and I do not expect a download to be this CPU load.  The download time is too long on all systems 4.

  My online search for answers has been frustrating, but several posts said search for viruses, malware and Trojans.  I ran Malwarebytes (free), Windows Defender, Norton Security and ESET (online) on systems and no objects are found.

  My most recent experience involved my Lenovo 7847 system (Intel dual core). Monday, May 23, I checked the updates and there were 15 updates important and 3 optional updates listed.

  After reviewing the updates, I chose the 15 updates and started the download process.  The svchost.exe that is associated with the update happened to 45-60% CPU usage, update status showed no size or % finished and the task manager - network or explore the process did not show any activity download for a long time.

  Finally, after about an hour, the update showed the download size and the % downloaded.  Svchost usage remains high during the time of whole download.  Once the download is complete, the restore point was created and updates have been installed, who also took some time (but it would be I/O CPU & Drive dependent).

  The download status has not changed during most of the time that the download process is running.  The Task Manager and process explore both show very little network activity up to that very near the end of the download procedure. There is therefore no real indication that the process is blocked or just turn very slowly.   It almost seems that the Microsoft servers are overloaded, they delay the download for some reason, or the process svchost and sub-process fail to create good handshake with the server for download.

  My Questions:

  1. Why is svchost usage so high when nothing seems to happen?
  2. Why does take an hour or more to download the updates?  These aren't the huge file sizes, and this attempt to update was almost 2 weeks after Patch Tuesday, then Microsoft servers should not be overloaded.
  3. Why is the situation unchanged for so long during the download process?
  4. most important, what can I do to change this situation?
   
  Thanks in advance for your help.

  My 'update problem' seems to have changed.  Checking updates takes a lot of CPU resources and a lot of time.

  We will leave well enough alone for now. [It took 3-4 hours for MU download/install updates of June on my Win7 boxes].

  But please bookmark this thread. If the behavior persists in July - and especially in August, respond to this thread instead of starting a new. Good luck!

• BlackBerry Smartphones battery drain with High CPU (v6.0 Bundle 3049) because of the net.rim.io.impl module

  Hello

  .

  I have improved my Torch (9800) a week ago and have been noticiing battery drain issues.  The problem is NOT persistent, but is most of the time that goes well.  I am currently on OS v6.0 bundle 3049 (v6.0.0.706, Devils 6.6.0.246).  My Wifi and Bluetooth are always TURNED off.  Only by using the Bell network, for which I have all 5 bars available.

  .

  I investigated further and found that the Blackberry system software was running with more than the processor - usually in the 1970s high, 90 same high.  And this corresponded over the hours until the battery was dead.  I have since deleted all the apps I have suspecpected - such as the Office of Nice and LinkedIn.  But the problem persists.

  .

  Battery pull was made several times, as I checked and there is no update of the OS.

  .

  Now, currently, only the Basic apps are loaded (Alt-Back): home, BBM, phone, Messages, Borwser.  All other applications are closed or exit.

  .

  Further study in the modules of the system software of BB, I found that the net_rim_io_impl, is her consuming ALL the CPU.  I don't know where/what this module does - so I'm not clear on this service within the BB I can disable (OFF) to get rid of the issue.

  .

  Please see the following screenshots, the CPU for the system a little, drops as Options use a part, otherwise it goes back 90 years, if left alone: -.

  

  And in the system software of BB: -.

  

  .

  Please help and guide, with either a fix to the module, or via a workaround solution, in which some service can be stopped or a setting can be changed to avoid this battery drain.

  .

  Thank you!

  I think it could have been resolved in a second thread.

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/BlackBerry-torch/pls-help-100-high-CPU-utilization-V6-0-bundl...