Newly created table not appearing is not in ESXi

HP DL380 G5

ESXi 5.5.0

Smart Array P400

I created the table using HP via SSH command line utility with the command on 2 x 300 GB drives

hpssacli slot = 1 ctrl create type = ld = 1I:1:7, 1I:1:8 size drives = raid 300 = 1

Grand - LEDs are lit and all is good - do a quick check of the State (note the new table is table C)

Array has

then 1I:1:5 (port 1I:box 1:bay 5, SAS, 72 GB, OK)

then 1I:1:6 (port 1I:box 1:bay 6, SAS, 72 GB, OK)

then 2I:1:3 (port 2I:box 1:bay 3, SAS, 72 GB, OK)

then 2I:1:4 (port 2I:box 1:bay 4, SAS, 72 GB, OK)

Table B

then 2I:1:1 (port 2I:box 1:bay 1, SAS, 36 GB, OK)

then 2I:1:2 (port 2I:box 1:bay 2, SAS, 36 GB, OK)

Table C

then 1I:1:7 (port 1I:box 1:bay 7, SAS, 300 GB, OK)

then 1I:1:8 (port 1I:box 1:bay 8, SAS, 300 GB, OK)

Problem, I have now, is that it does not appear in storage, even when I re-fresh it or try to add additional storage. Is there anything else I need to do for the newly created table? On a quick google, I see nothing. I wonder if it is because I created the mirror with the actual size of the readers, however if this was going to be a problem, I don't know that it would be bombed when I created it.

The problem is probably that the partitions exist at all. Unless you need these NTFS partitions, take a look at http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1008886 ("information partitioning compensation in ESXi using the DD utility" section) to see if that solves the problem.

André

Tags: VMware

Similar Questions

Cannot SELECT newly created tables
Hi all

Summer faced with granting permissions to the newly created tables.

I designed a database in Toad DataModeller and generated the script data out of it.

After you run the script, I can see the tables in schema browser Toad but cannot run a query on those.

If I run for example - "* select * users *; I get an error "ORA00942 - Table or view does not exist.

But if I create a new table in Toad itself (table Assistant creation of usage, I can do SELECT without any problem.

There is no difference in the table creation script generated by the Toad and toad Datamodeller.

I tried to connect as SYSDBA and ran ' * GRANT ALL ON USERS TO TEST. " (The TEST is normal user).

I got all kinds of permissions for the TEST user account... But still it's not working. :(

I put the table creation script and the creation of the user script... If that helps.

Please suggest.
Please share the script. With the assumption that you are connected to the same pattern on the same instance of two different tools, my guess is the name table (and possibly the names of the columns) are in quotes and have been spelled in cases - this is why you are not able to query these tables.

loading data into the newly created table
I have a basic question

I have a table named 'A' and it has 5 columns

Now, I created a new table 'B' and copied the 4 columns of table "A".

Now, I have to add the 5th column along wiith given in table "B".

my table for 'B' have now 5 columns and the same data that the table 'one '.

Could someone tell me the procedure. According to my knowledge, it is not possible. Can I even the reason for it.

Note: With let them down my new table

Thanks and greetings
Pallis
Assumption: You have the following table:

Table1 (a number, b, c number, number d, e number);

You made Table2 from table1 as below with the same data as for these 4 columns table1 table2.
Table1 (a number, b number, number c number d)

Now, you want to copy the e column too in table1 from table2...

Means the simplest is:
```
drop table table2;
crate table table2 as select a,b,c,d,e from table1;
```
Another way is:
```
alter table table2 add e number;

update table2  t2
set  t2.e = ( select t1.e from table1 t1 where t1.a=t2.a and t1.b=t2.b and t1.c=t2.c and t1.d=t2.d);
```
If you have the primary key on table1, then only the primary columns must be mapped in this inner query where clause.

Kind regards...

How to get data in the procedure after CREATE TABLE table1 AS SELECT * from table2

Hello
can any body tell me how to get the data in the new table created in the procedure. because it gives following error.
- Error (47,21): PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
tableName: = "BCKUP_" | TO_CHAR (sysdate, 'ddmmrrrr');
tableDDL: = 'CREATE TABLE' | tableName. "AS SELECT * FROM Table1 where to_char(MSG_IN_TIME,''dd-mon-rrrr'') < sysdate - ' | daysNumber;
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE backUpDDL;
COMMIT;
DELETE FROM Table1;
How to select the data in the newly created table. as...
Select * from ". tableName;

Do not choose anything to get the number...

Just after backupDDL EXECUTE IMMEDIATE, simply refers to SQL % ROWCOUNT - who will be the number of lines.

Oh and DDL engages automatically, your commitment is redundant.

New tables and indexes created do not appear in the view dba_segments
Hi all

I created 3 tables and indexes, but these items do not appear in dba_segments views. Is this a normal behavior? Previously, with dictionary managed tablespace, I can specify the least possible to create, at the table/index is created. But I don't know how works the locally managed tablespace. Please do advice. Thank you much in advance.

I am using Oracle 11 g R2 (11.2.0.1.0) for Microsoft Windows (x 64), running on Windows 7.

To reproduce this problem, I created the tablespaces as follows:

CREATE TABLESPACE CUST_DATA
DATAFILE ' d:\app\asus\oradata\orcl11gr2\CUST_DATA01. DBF' SIZE 512K
AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT MAXSIZE 2000 K 256K
MANAGEMENT UNIFORM LOCAL 256K SIZE MEASURE
SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO;

CREATE TABLESPACE CUST_INDX
DATAFILE ' d:\app\asus\oradata\orcl11gr2\CUST_INDX. DBF' SIZE 256K
AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT MAXSIZE 2000 K 128K
MANAGEMENT UNIFORM LOCAL 128K SIZE MEASURE
SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT AUTO;

CREATE TABLE CUSTOMER_MASTER (CUST_ID VARCHAR2 (10))
CUST_NAME VARCHAR2 (30),
E-MAIL VARCHAR2 (30),
DATE OF BIRTH,
ADD_TYPE CHAR (2) CONSTRAINT CK_ADD_TYPE CHECK (ADD_TYPE ("B1", "B2", "H1", "H2")),
CRE_USER VARCHAR2 (5) DEFAULT USER,.
CRE_TIME TIMESTAMP (3) DEFAULT SYSTIMESTAMP.
MOD_USER VARCHAR2 (5).
MOD_TIME TIMESTAMP (3),
CONSTRAINT PK_CUSTOMER_MASTER PRIMARY KEY (CUST_ID) USING INDEX TABLESPACE CUST_INDX)
TABLESPACE CUST_DATA;

SQL > SELECT TABLE_NAME, nom_tablespace
USER_TABLES 2
3 WHERE TABLE_NAME LIKE '% CUST. "

TABLE_NAME, TABLESPACE_NAME
------------------------------ ------------------------------
CUSTOMER_MASTER CUST_DATA

SQL > SELECT INDEX_NAME, nom_tablespace
2 FROM USER_INDEXES
3 WHERE TABLE_NAME LIKE '% CUST. "

INDEX_NAME TABLESPACE_NAME
------------------------------ ------------------------------
PK_CUSTOMER_MASTER CUST_INDX

SQL > SELECT nom_segment, SEGMENT_TYPE, nom_tablespace, BYTES
2 FROM WHERE USER_SEGMENTS;

no selected line
An extension to what Sybrand said:

There is a parameter called differed_segment_creation, who runs the behavior.

If it is set to TRUE (the default), no segments will be allocated until you fill your table / index.

Try to insert a row. You will see your table and index in dba_segments.

See for more information

http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E14072_01/server.112/e10595/tables002.htm

Delete operation does not remove the newly created line of VO

Hi all
I use Jdev 11.1.1.7
I try to use a simple delete on a line of an af:table operation.
The line is newly created (not in DB) and I have some autoSubmit = "true" defined on certain inputText of the table (not sure if it's relevant information).
I followed the nice post of Andrejus on the immediate = "true" the button Delete.
Andrejus Baranovskis Blog: Deleting line new form ADF (ADF followed Webinar)
It works fine when I delete the line, it ignores validation and disappears from my af:table.
But when I commit my transaction, all new lines, even those deleted, stored in DB.
No idea what could be the problem?
Let me know if you need me to post the code.
Thanks for your time!

I found the problem in the definition of my VO.

The use of the entity has been defined with the property DeleteParticipant = "false"...

What I don't understand is the reason why I had to go to the source to change, in the overview of the VO, the box is read-only...

'Create table' is not possible with Jet.OLEDB.4.0

I use LabVIEW Toolkit DB to access databases.

I opened an access database of microsoft with the connection string "Provider = Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0; Data Source = C:\test3.accdb".

When I exeucted

create table leq_octave_5min (recorded_time DATETIME CONSTRAINT PRIMARY KEY pk1,
Leq5 LEQ5 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Min MIN FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Max MAX FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
L05 FLOAT L05 CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.
L10 FLOAT L10 CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.
L50 FLOAT L50 CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.
L.90 L.90 FLOAT CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,
L95 FLOAT L95 CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.
Us01 us01 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
EN02 EN02 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr03 FR03 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr04 fr04 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr05 fr05 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr06 fr06 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr07 fr07 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr08 FR08 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr09 FR09 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr10 fr10 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr11 FR11 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr12 FR12 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr13 FR13 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr14 FR14 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr15 FR15 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr16 FR16 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr17 FR17 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr18 FR18 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr19 FR19 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr20 FR20 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr21 FR21 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr22 FR22 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
E23, e23 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr24 FR24 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr25 fr25 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr26 FR26 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr27 fr27 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr28 FR28 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr29 FR29 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
Fr30 FR30 FLOAT NOT NULL CONSTRAINT,
status TEXT (2) st NOT NULL CONSTRAINT)

I got an error saying "error ADO: 0x80040E14.

I have not had any problems with an ODBC driver.

Why make such a mistake with Jet OLE DB?

A web page was told that MIN and MAX are reserved words of Jet 4.0.

So I defined with [and].

Then, after it works.

Total memory of 4 GB newly installed does not appear in the Task Manager

Total memory of 4 GB newly installed does not appear in the tab of the Task Manager performance. Only 3.3 GB appears. Is something wrong with the chopsticks of mem or mem from Vista 32 bit OS limit uses at this level. I have SP2.

http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929605

"System memory shown in the system information dialog box in Windows Vista is less than expected if the 4 GB of RAM is installed.

This behavior is the expected result of some hardware and software factors.

Various devices in a typical computer require memory-mapped access. This is known as memory-mapped i/o (MMIO). For the MMIO space is available for 32-bit operating systems, the MMIO space must reside in the first 4 GB of address space.

For example, if you have a video card that has 256 MB on-board memory, that memory must be mapped in the first 4 GB of address space. If 4 GB of system memory is already installed, the part of this address space must be reserved by the graphics memory mapping. Graphics memory mapping replaces part of the system memory. These conditions reduce the total amount of memory available to the OS System.

The reduction in available system memory depends on the devices that are installed in the computer. However, to avoid potential driver compatibility issues, 32-bit versions of Windows Vista limit the total available memory to 3.12 GB. See the section 'More information' for more information on potential driver compatibility issues.

If a computer has many features implemented, the available memory can be reduced to 3 GB or less. However, the maximum memory available in 32-bit versions of Windows Vista is typically 3.12 GB.

See you soon.

Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

Port-group on newly created vDS does not work

Hello
I have 4 hosts ESXi with version 5.1. The VCenter had the same version 5.1 but the server crashed a few months back, and reinstalled the VCenter engineer new version 5.5 U2. I also have virtual Distributed Switch configured with several groups of ports (VLAN). VLANS are separated by the ID VLAN different. All virtual machines with their VLAN respective can communicate to the breast even VLAN, but also the other VLANs.
However, I just created a new group of Port with different VLAN ID. Now, the virtual machines in this new VLAN cannot communicate themselves as well as other VLANs. From the virtual machines ping response say "Destination host" inaccessible
When I move the virtual machines to another VLAN they start working and when I move them back to this new VLAN they do not.
I also tried assigning VLAN IDS to another VLAN to this group of port newly created, beginning of VMs works again. But the VLAN ID of this group of ports does not work with other groups of Port.
To me, it seems that the creation of new VLAN ID has some problems. Although I followed the documented process of VMWare.
I noticed that I have the following versions:
1 VCenter Server: worm 5.5
2 Server ESXI host: ver 5.1
3 vDisbritued Switch: ver 5.0
Have idea if it's a bug or compatibility problems. Am I missing something?
Thank you

I was talking about this doc-

https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/115461/configuring-VLANs-UCS-and-VMware

I hope this help you.

Thank you

Hentzien

Destination area has VMware player 3.1.4. Not possible to run a newly created virtual machine.

For the first time, I tried to virtualize my machine using VMware vCenter Converter Standalone. The destination machine has VMware Player installed 3.1.4, so I chose, as a destination having VMware 4.0.x instead of VMware 3.0.x as 3.1.4 overflows 3.0.x. The newly created virtual machine does not under VMware 3.1.4. Is there anyway out of this except can create an another VM using VMware player 3.0.x as the destination machine? Thank you.

Then, you should be able to simply create a (empty) virtual machine with VMware Player 3.x and then just remove the blank virtual hard drive (hard files) and replace it with the one created with VMware vCenter Converter.

ORA-14030: partitioning column does not exist in the CREATE TABLE statement
Hi all

We are trying to create a partition materialized view and get an error below.
ORA-14030: partitioning column does not exist in the CREATE TABLE statement
Our GL_BALANCES21 and GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 base tables is already divided by interval of the range on Code_combination_id.
In the same way that we try to partition the view materialized
We get the error.
ORA-14030: partitioning column does not exist in the CREATE TABLE statement
Where the clause there are 4 tables gl_balances21, gl_code_combinations21, gl_periods and gl_set_of_books.

CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW apps. BAL_PART
PARTITION BY RANGE ("CODE_COMBINATION_ID")
(SCORE LOWER (80000) VALUES,
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (160000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (240000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (320000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (400000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (480000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (560000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (640000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (720000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (800000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (880000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (960000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (10400000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (11200000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (12000000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (12800000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (13600000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (14400000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (15200000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (16000000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (16800000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (17600000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (18400000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (19200000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (20000000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (20800000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (21600000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (22400000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (23200000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (24000000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (24800000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (25600000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (26400000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (27200000),
PARTITION OF LOWER VALUES (28000000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (28800000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (29600000),
PARTITION OF VALUES LESS THAN (30400000),
PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE))
QUICKLY REFRESH ON DEMAND
SELECT the QUERY REWRITE as
SELECT GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21. ROWID C1,
GL.GL_BALANCES21. ROWID C2,
"GL". "" GL_BALANCES21 ". "" ACTUAL_FLAG, "
"GL". "" GL_BALANCES21 ". "" CURRENCY_CODE "
"GL". "" GL_BALANCES21 ". "" PERIOD_NUM, "
"GL". "" GL_BALANCES21 ". "" PERIOD_YEAR ".
"GL". "" GL_BALANCES21 ". "" SET_OF_BOOKS_ID ""SOB_ID"
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" CODE_COMBINATION_ID ""CCID.
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT1 ",.
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT10, "
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" DIRECTION11, "
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT12, "
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT13, "
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT14, "
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT2 ",.
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT3. "
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT4, "
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT5, "
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT6, "
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT7. "
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT8, "
"GL". "" GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21 ". "" SEGMENT9, "
"GL". "" "" GL_PERIODS '. "" PERIOD_NAME,"
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (BEGIN_BALANCE_CR', 0) Open_Bal_Cr,
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (BEGIN_BALANCE_CR', 0) +.
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (PERIOD_NET_CR', 0) Close_Bal_Cr,
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (BEGIN_BALANCE_DR', 0) Open_Bal_Dr,
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (BEGIN_BALANCE_DR', 0) +.
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (PERIOD_NET_DR', 0) Close_Bal_Dr,
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (BEGIN_BALANCE_DR', 0).
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (BEGIN_BALANCE_CR', 0) Open_Bal,
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (BEGIN_BALANCE_DR', 0).
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (BEGIN_BALANCE_CR', 0) +.
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (PERIOD_NET_DR', 0).
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (PERIOD_NET_CR', 0) Close_Bal,
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (PERIOD_NET_CR', 0) Period_Cr,
NVL ("GL". "GL_BALANCES21" "." " (PERIOD_NET_DR', 0) Period_Dr
OF GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21.
GL.GL_BALANCES21,
GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS,
GL.GL_PERIODS
WHERE GL.GL_BALANCES21. CODE_COMBINATION_ID = GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21. CODE_COMBINATION_ID
AND GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS. SET_OF_BOOKS_ID = GL.GL_BALANCES21. SET_OF_BOOKS_ID
AND GL.GL_PERIODS. PERIOD_NUM = GL.GL_BALANCES21. PERIOD_NUM
AND GL.GL_PERIODS. PERIOD_YEAR = GL.GL_BALANCES21. PERIOD_YEAR
AND GL.GL_PERIODS. PERIOD_TYPE = GL.GL_BALANCES21. PERIOD_TYPE
AND GL.GL_PERIODS. PERIOD_NAME = GL.GL_BALANCES21. PERIOD_NAME
AND GL.GL_PERIODS. PERIOD_SET_NAME = GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS. PERIOD_SET_NAME
and gl.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21.summary_flag! = « Y »

ERROR on line 54:
ORA-01013: user has requested the cancellation of the current operation

I checked the metalink note saying that ensure that all columns in a partitioning column list are columns of
the table being created.

Partition is already there, on the column of code_combination_id of gl_balances21 and gl_code_combinations21.

Please suggest.

Thank you
It's your mistake:
```
PARTITION BY RANGE ("CODE_COMBINATION_ID") 
```
but in your projection of column list, you have an alias he:
```
"GL"."GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS21"."CODE_COMBINATION_ID" "CCID",
```
You must use the alias as a partition key, not the name fom the secondary table column.
--
John Watson
Oracle Certified Master s/n
http://skillbuilders.com

sqldeveloper could not connect the newly created user
Here is my description of my computer and software
# OS - > ubuntu 10.04 (32 bit)
# DB-> 10 g XE
# Request Express - > version 4.0.2
# Sqldeveloper-> version 3.0.04

I installed 10g XE in my ubuntu 10.04 (32-bit) with success and you then unblock account HR. After that I upgraded application Express 2 to 4. Then created a new "worksapce' with user name and password.

I can access with success of HR, sys and system account of sqldeveloper. But when I try to access newly created valid workspace with his user name and password I could not do that. You can see more details, [see here | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_G_EeBgZ1KY].

But in the past, I can connect newly created Workspace even as human resources account. So what's the problem. Can you guyz guide me to conncet it.

Thanks in advance
>
I can access with success of HR, sys and system account of sqldeveloper. But when I try to access newly created valid workspace with his user name and password I couldn't do that
>
If you have a problem or a question about Apex post in this forum
Oracle Application Express (APEX)

In sql developer, you can only connect to users of Oracle (schemas), not workspaces. So unless you have a user called "admin" Oracle, you won't be able to connect. When you created the workspace you may reuse an existing schema or provide a name for the new schema. These patterns are what you would connect to.

In the nav tree open the tree of the user "sys" and see the list of "other users". This subtree will contain ALL Oracle users. You must log on to one of them.

Other users but admin is not able to connect to a newly created application
Hello

My customer has created a new application and only admin users have used until now. Now, they have configured the user rights to a group of people "Sales" but none of the people in this group of users are able to connect to the new application. They get the following error message: "year error occurred while processing this page.» See the log for more details. If please close the current tab and launch the application again. »

I should advice them on the phone, I have no access to this environment right now myself. The 'Sales' people are able to connect to the old application. You have any suggestions what could be harming the user the rights, roles, etc. ? And the error message refers to Essbase journal or... ?

Thank you very much for your suggestions!
PLS, check that the application is not in the section Maintenance (administration-> application-> settings) mode is default settings for newly created app

Published by: vvipirailo on May 30, 2012 21:50

ORA-00604 with ORA-20010: the user is not authorized to CREATE Table
Hello

I use 11.1.0.7 database

I'm only running this SQL logged on as a schema PLAN. PLAN scheme a DBA privilege but I receive error message-
```
create table SALARY.test (ID NUMBER);
create table SALARY.test (ID NUMBER)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-20010: PLAN is not allowed to CREATE this -
SALARY.TEST
ORA-06512: at line 15
```
What can be the problem here?

Thank you!
user608897 wrote:

I know that we cannot use in a DDL trigger, but how can this be a DDL trigger.

As sybrand hinted it often allows to read a manual.

http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e16508/srvrside.htm#CNCPT118

>
Overview of triggers

A database trigger is a stored program unit compiled, written in PL/SQL or Java, that Oracle Database ("fire") automatically calls whenever one of the following occurs:

1. DML instructions on a particular table or view, issued by a user
The DML statements modify data in the schema objects. For example, inserting and removing lines are DML operations.

* 2. DDL statements issued by a particular user or any user *.
DDL statements define schema objects. For example, create a table and add a column are DDL operations.

3. database events
User login or closing of session, errors and database startup or a stop are events that can call triggers.
>

A DDL trigger is one that runs when the DDL is made as in 2 above.

When you create the table, you run DDL, someone wrote a trigger that runs when you try to create the table, and in this trigger, they raise a user-defined exception ORA-20010: the user is not authorized to CREATE Table to tell you that you are not authorized to create the table.

Why not a Global change, newly created to change the activity ID work?
Why not a newly created role of Global change (substrings) to change the activity ID work? Yet, I can copy a modifier of function (substrings) existing Global change to change the activity ID and it will work. The newly created is identical to that copied?
Please upgrade to P6v7 and rename the activity ID problem will be fixed for life.
You can rename 10 000 activities in 10 seconds using P6v7 without global change running.

Jawad
Novo rail, Sydney

Newly created table not appearing is not in ESXi

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for