Outlook 2007 backup file is greater than the source file. Why?

My Outlook pst data source personal folders file using 2.4 GB.  The backup file (by using the backup tool) uses 5.4 GB.  Why the difference?  I back up all my data on a hard drive to FAT 32 format, which will not accept a file greater than 4 GB, so I'm not able to save Outlook backup file given its current size.

Hello GaryCalgary,

Thanks for visiting the site of the community of Microsoft Windows XP. The question you have posted is related to Outlook and would be better suited to the community of Office Discussion groups. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.
Outlook General Questions Discussion Group

Steven
Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think

Tags: Windows

Similar Questions

  • Namespace 0,0 in the application descriptor file must be equal to or greater than the minimum version 3.1

    Hello everyone

    I followed the link to create app Hello world for the playbook using Flashbuilder 4.6.

    https://developer.BlackBerry.com/air/documentation/ww_air_getting_started/Create_your_first_applicat...

    and I get the following error

    Namespace 0,0 in the application descriptor file must be equal to or greater than the minimum version 3.1 required by Flex SDK. AirHelloWorld-app.xml/AirHelloWorld/srcUnknownAIR application.xml problem.

    Any ideas or suggestions?

    Thank you

    I solved this problem.

    A PC restrated it is resolved.

    Thank you

  • Flex Builder error: Namespace 2.6 in the application descriptor file must be equal to or greater than the minimum version 3.1 required by Flex SDK.

    "2.6 Namespace in the application descriptor file must be equal to or greater than the minimum version 3.1 required by the Flex SDK kit."

    what it means?

    to run the application

    (1) I need lower version 3.1

    (2) I need a newer version than the 3.1

    I'm confused.

    You can change the project xml file. I solved like this.

  • 2.6 Namespace in the application descriptor file must be equal to or greater than the minimum version

    I imported a project mobile fb fb4.6, but this error:

    2.6 Namespace in the application descriptor file must be equal to or greater than the minimum version 3.1 required by Flex SDK.

    Is there a quick fix for this?

    you need to replace http://ns.adobe.com/air/application/2.6 "> to http://ns.adobe.com/air/application/3.1" > inside *-app.xml file. ""

  • How can I burn a movie to a blank dvd when the movie to burn is greater than the amount of space on the blank dvd?

    How can I burn a movie to a blank dvd when the movie to burn is greater than the amount of space on the blank dvd?

    How can I burn a movie to a blank dvd when the movie to burn is greater than the amount of space on the blank dvd?

    You could import the movie into Windows Movie Maker, use the 'split' option, split the video to 2 or more smaller movie files, then burn each smaller movie file to separate DVDs.

    This would be my method. There may be a better way.

    For the benefits of others looking for answers, please mark as answer suggestion if it solves your problem.

  • give meaning to cases where minimum effective_start_date is greater than the current date

    Hi guys, I'm not a developer oracle as such, but I'm trying to get some information from oracle to send to other systems of the company, since we are dealing with oracle HRMS as the master system for employee information.

    In particular, we would like to create people in our training and the security system when they are created in oracle.

    I was told that the oracle per_all_people_f object acts as a slowly changing dimension of type 2, where a person can have several versions, which only is always the current version and the current version can be retrieved using the standard parttern of "date of current between the effective start date and actual end date. So far so good.

    However, I can see there are cases where the minimum 'effective_start_date' is greater than the current date. It is, indeed, equal to their start_date. I guess start_date represents "the first day of work" of the person.

    But this means then there is no "current" information known to people who have not yet really started working for the company again. This seems odd. How can I have someone for whom we have no information "currently correct? I was told that the effective_start_date of the line is automatically set to their "first day of work" date on which the information is entered into the system, IE, the user to enter information doesn't have the ability to say 'this is the current version of the data for that person, who starts at a date in the future. "

    For this reason, I cannot know these new people (who have been entered in oracle, but did not have actually to their first day of work still) training system. But we would obviously get people established in related systems so that they can use all of these systems on their first day of work.

    Have I misunderstood something here? How can there be no correct version for a person at the date and time?

    Hello

    How normally "inform you" the training system on a new person record? If it's a kind of report or an interface, it may be useful changed to examine a number of days in the future, for example + 7

    It is important to understand when you look at an Oracle HRMS instance through enforcement (i.e. the ' front end'), you look at the data on a date date (of the session) - by default, the date is the system date, but it is possible for a user to change this date to be in the future or the past as they see fit. The ability to implement the records in person in the future is a great feature to have, of course, but it must be understood that in this situation, at the date of the day the person's file logically does not exist yet from the point of view of the MFC features. Behind the scenes, however, in the per_all_people_f of the table, the line exist. Similarly, future update of changes to a person (e.g. marital status from Single to married) could be implemented, and the change in status would be visible if the session has been scheduled on a date or after the date of the marriage. As correctly observe you, behind the scenes, the table will hold all historic entries for this person_id with contiguous effective_start_date and effective_end_date beaches.

    Either way, date_start value is not related to as such hiring date; It is actually the value of effective_start_date earlier for the person_id. All changes, regardless of how many or what the effective_start_date is in each case, will always carry this same start_date value. It * may * be identical to the hiring date (certainly the fact that you configure their hire date person records would cause that), but if the person has been created as a postulant effective from 1 September and was then hired has effect from 21 September, column start_date value would be still 1 September. The record of the person would be visible when the current date is on or after this date - the only difference is that they show that an employee until the 21st.

    I hope this helps, but it is possible, that I just confused you more!

    Clive

  • Increment Dt start with day greater than the Dt at the end of the year Prev in Pro * C

    Morning people and greetings from Toronto.

    I'm trying to change a Pro * C program. Since ages I touched a Pro * C program but I have made an attempt for her. I would probably need some help andhopefully is the right forum I could nto seem to find any section decicated Pro * C programs.

    Here's what its supposed to do. I'm supposed to check if a Start Date of overlap between the start dates and dates from the end of the previous year, and if so, I'm supposed to assign one day Start Date greater than the Date of the end of the previous year.

    I have a control panel that stores records for start date and end Date for each year. Here's what I have for 2010.

    Start date = 8 May 2010 '; End date = may 12, 2011 'year =' 2010 From now the previous record in the table 1 (where the new record is supposed to be inserted) has a record that looks like this:
    DOC_ID     NAME               YEAR         START_DATE     END_DATE
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    999999     Mary Poppins      2009         03-May-2009      08-May-2010
    Now, based on the control table, the Start Date for 2010 coincides with the Date of the end of 2009. In this case, I would need to move the start date = may 9, 2010 "(Date of end + 1)

    Here is my ProC program in hand
    /* Include Headers */
    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <stdlib.h>
    #include <string.h>
    #include <ctype.h>
    #include <math.h>
    ---------------------------
    /* Define constants */
    ---------------------------
    #define  nullterm(string) string.arr[string.len] = '\0';
    /* SQL Host Variables */
    exec sql begin declare section;
    exec sql include sqlca;
    
     varchar   ctrl_start_date[11];
     short     ctrl_start_date_ind;
     varchar   ctrl_end_date[11];
     short     ctrl_end_date_ind;
    
     varchar   end_date[11];
     short     end_date_ind;
    
     int       exist_end_date_flag;
     short     exist_end_date_flag_ind;
    
    exec sql end declare section;
    
    
    /* Function Prototypes */
    
    void check_date_overlap();
    
    
    void main(int argc, char *argv[])
    {
    /* Coding starts here */
    
    void get_ctrl_dates()
    {
     exec sql
      select  to_char(trunc(ctrl_start_date),'YYYY/MM/DD'),
              to_char(trunc(ctrl_end_date),'YYYY/MM/DD')
      into    :ctrl_start_date :ctrl_start_date_ind,
              :ctrl_end_date  :ctrl_end_date_ind
      from    control_tb
      where   current_yyyy = :year_number;
    }
    
       check_date_overlap();
    
       if (strcmp( (char *)run_mode.arr,"N")==0)
       {
        check_date_overlap();
        create_person_rec(); /* This will insert record into person_tb table */
       }
    }
    
    /***********************/
    /* CHECK_DATE_OVERLAP  */ 
    /***********************/
    void check_date_overlap()
    {
    
     exist_end_date_flag = 0; /* assume he does not have a record */
    
     exec sql
      select count(*), end_date + 1
      into   :exist_end_date_flag exist_end_date_flag_ind,
             :end_date :end_date_ind
      from   person_tb
      where  doc_id = :doc_id
      and (( :ctrl_start_date between start_date  and end_date ) or
           ( :ctrl_end_date   between start_date  and end_date ) or
           ( start_date between :ctrl_start_date  and :ctrl_end_date ) or
           ( end_date   between :ctrl_start_date  and :ctrl_end_date ))
      and    year_number = (:year_number - 1)
      group by end_date
      having count(*) = 1;
    
      /*** Error Check Routine goes in here ***/
    
      /* Overlapping of dates; Set the Start Date equal End Date + 1 to avoid overlap */
      if (exist_end_date_flag == 1)
      {
       print_to_err_file("The Start Date is overlapping with a previous period.",0);
      }
    
       nullterm(end_date);
    
    } /* check_date_overlap */
    Here would be my question:

    My question is, should the SQL above be written like this instead?
    /***********************/
    /* CHECK_DATE_OVERLAP  */ 
    /***********************/
    void check_date_overlap()
    {
    
     exist_end_date_flag = 0; /* assume he does not have a record */
    
     exec sql
      select count(*), end_date
      into   :exist_end_date_flag exist_end_date_flag_ind,
             :end_date :end_date_ind
      from   person_tb
      where  doc_id = :doc_id
      and (( :ctrl_start_date between start_date  and end_date ) or
           ( :ctrl_end_date   between start_date  and end_date ) or
           ( start_date between :ctrl_start_date  and :ctrl_end_date ) or
           ( end_date   between :ctrl_start_date  and :ctrl_end_date ))
      and    year_number = (:year_number - 1)
      group by end_date;
    
      /*** Error Check Routine goes in here ***/
    
      /* Overlapping of dates; Set the Start Date equal End Date + 1 to avoid overlap */
      if (exist_end_date_flag == 1)
      {
        /* Is this even correct or would I have to do a strcpy?.
            Also note that I am overwriting ctrl_start_date which
            was fetched earlier in get_ctrl_dates() */
       ctrl_start_date = end_date + 1;
       print_to_err_file("The Start Date is overlapping with a previous period.",0);
      }
    
       nullterm(end_date);
    
    } /* check_date_overlap */
    Published by: Raj404261 on June 10, 2009 11:21

    You can put your code between the {code}

    As
    {code}
    your code...
    ...
    {code}

    SS

  • ORA-22813: value of the operand is greater than the limits of the system

    Hello
    for small query

    SQL > select COMPLETION_TIME from RC_BACKUP_FILES WHERE ROWNUM < 2;

    I get

    ORA-22813: value of the operand is greater than the limits of the system

    It seems starnge to me, you know?

    I have a great value operand?

    Thanks for help.

    The Version could help here

    might be a bug

  • ProRes renders EI have garbage Frames / longer than the Source

    I had some weird problems output prores of After Effect recently. My workflow typical offline was Prores422HQ or Prores4444 exit offline for and it is a regular method of rock for years. Recently, all Prores of After Effects renders have additional frameworks of garbage and longer than the source:

    An animation example 720 with DPX source, attended the Prores4444 image eventually 724 frameworks when read on the desk or ingested in Avid/Final Cut. When this rendering is re-imported in AE, it is considered as having only 720 images and fits perfectly into the chronology of 720 original frame, but outside the EA, it is considered as having 724 frameworks (QT7, Avid, Final Cut, etc.).

    Has anyone seen this problem before? I started using Avid rather - codecs which works very well - but this question worries since most deliverables are Prores these days... and AE was the best way to maintain the 16 bits of color in these sorties.

    * This problem started around a month ago and is on all GFX boxes in the Office *.

    Chris

    This problem is resolved by update fixes after effects CC (12.2.1), which is now available:

    http://Adobe.LY/AE_CC_1221

    Note the part at the end of this page on a crucial update for the creative cloud desktop application, which addresses serious problems with the SOUL, first Pro and After Effects.

  • Window Vista Ultimate 2007 backup files empty on the external drive.

    The computer is a desktop HP running Windows Vista Ultimate 2007, 32 Bit OS, RAM 400 GB and Intel Quad CPU 2 .4GHz.

    I ran Windows Vista backup for a full backup and a backup of the file.  When I look at the external disk to verify the backup files are empty.  There are two created on the external hard drive, but both files are empty.  The program indicates that the backup routine successfully on the external drive. I have not received any error message.

    I use a Toshiba external drive with 500 + GB.  I have a lot of room.  I tried twice.  The first time I reformatted the external drive using Windows and revived the full backup only.  Once again the image file on the external drive shows 0 bytes, 0 files.

    I wonder why the backup files are not getting moved on the external drive.

    Hi BEM Consult,.

    1. are you allowing Windows to choose recommended backup or you choose "Let me pick" option on the backup configuration window?

    We recommend that you connect the external hard drive on another computer and check if the size of the backup file is in the list.

    Check if you have selected all the items in the backup settings to create a backup file. Try to create a new backup file by selecting all items on the Backup Wizard and check the result.

    See set or change automatic backup settings

    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

  • File is greater than the maximum size supported by the data store "Datastore1".

    Okay, I'm trying to create a virtual machine from 350 GB.  I need to run a database of 283 GB to test / Proof of concept that will grow more than 325 GB. I get this error message

    -


    Error

    -


    File is larger than the maximum size supported by datastore 'Datastore '.  vm name.domain.com/server name.domain.com.vmdk

    -


    Ok

    -


    I have read that I need to increase the size of the block, but I need to remove the data store. Is it the same on ESXi 4.0?  I have 4 other VM about 150 GB. Please tell me I'm wrong.  Please...

    Same rules apply.  Create an another LUN with the correct block size and away files or hang the lun and recreate

    Steve Beaver

    VMware communities user moderator

    VMware vExpert 2009

    ====

    Co-author of "VMware ESX Essentials in the data center" virtual

    (ISBN:1420070274) Auerbach

    Come and see my blog: www.theVirtualBlackHole.com

    Come follow me on twitter http://www.twitter.com/sbeaver

    *Virtualization is a journey, not a project. *

  • Deny access to my SkyDrive workbook error: "workbook is greater than the maximum size of workbook can be opened in the browser.

    Original title: deny access to my workbook to SkyDrive

    I have a workbook stored in SkyDrive that I share with several co-workers. We had no problem sharing the workbook for the last two weeks, but this morning, we are all getting an error message saying "Workbook is larger than the maximum size of workbook can be opened in the browser" and cannot access it at all. It's a very important workbook we need on a daily basis at work, then I would greatly appreciate any advice you could provide!

    Thank you
    Samantha

    Hello

    Because the problem is related to SkyDrive, I suggest you to report this problem in windows live support team.
    http://windowslivehelp.com/product.aspx?ProductID=6

  • Windows 7 backup is much bigger than my source files.

    I have a new Dell Precision M6500 running Windows 7 pro 64-bit. Hard drive is 500 GB and I configured the backup and restore feature to backup to a hard disk of 500 GB eSata extrnal.

    I'm just back up my data to 'library' files which explain probably about 150 GB. However, very quickly the external 500 GB drive is full

    "After the backup is apparently running for a few hours I get the message:

    "Check backup of disk space - that your backups are being saved on the disk is not enough free space".

    I click on options, manage disk space for backup, it is said I can free disk space by removing backups of data files, but there is a "period of backup" listed

    Under the Backup Configuration, I checked that only a set of 150 GB of data files are checked to save and "include an image of disk system" is not checked

    Hi casidougal,

    I suggest you check the settings below.

    To view and manage your backup disk space

    (a) open backup and restore by clicking the Start button, click Control Panel, click system and Maintenanceand then clicking backup and restore.

    (b) click on Manage space. If you are prompted for an administrator password or a confirmation, type the password or provide confirmation.

    (c) now under data backup file, click view backups.

    Now, you would see the list of backup the value entered for each full backup, it should argued to the top entries.

    You should also see the set of data that has been saved, do you think that any new data that has been defined by the options?

    You can also view the contents of the Windows backup logs. They can be found at this place C:\Windows\Logs\WindowsBackup.

    Should what backup settings I use to maximize my disk space?

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/what-backup-settings-should-I-use-to-maximize-my-disk-space

    Back up and restore: frequently asked questions

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/back-up-and-restore-frequently-asked-questions

    I hope this helps!

    Halima S - Microsoft technical support.

    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

  • iCloud library greater than the Mac library

    I have in my original photo library with all photos Mac and the size is about 108 GB. After activating iCloud photo library, I see that the same library iCloud is about 202 GB! In my Mac, I have the ability to download all the photos in original quality.

    I also see that, in the two libraries, the amount of photos and videos is the same. So my question is why is the iCloud photo library so much bigger and what can I do to reduce it to the same size as the local library.

    The library in iCloud should be less than the library on your Mac, unless you do not use storage optimize or the Mac is still downloading iCloud.  You see a progress bar in Photos > Preferences > iCloud Panel?

    In my Mac, I have the ability to download all the photos in original quality.

    Have you turned it on recently?

    You synchronize iCloud photo library with multiple devices?

  • Assets of image import as a res lower than the source

    I have seen several posts similar to this discussion and have never seen a response. Whenever I attempt to ad an image, sometimes half of the original asset. I tried format PNG, JPG, Gif etc. and it's all the same. Years ago, when I used first Muse, it didn't happen. Just to put everything everybody some time, yes I'm saving the images correctly and the size/resolution 100% I'm looking. I did this for a loooong time. For example, I 1600x600px image at 72 dpi. Save the images in the same way and the same resolutions I would entrust to any developer.  My Muse file is located at standard resolution. I deselected retina, hoping that would solve the problem.

    What happens is when I drag the image a Muse W 1600px site, the image comes in about 1/2 - 1 / 3 of the original size. (Note: I also can't not proportional to scale while holding SHIFT as is the norm in Adobe products). I used really love using Muse for prototypes show customers, but for this reason probably, and my inability to get an answer, I gave up. Once and a while, like now, I'm, hoping things will work properly.

    Please let me know if you know what's the deal. kind of makes me crazy. It's used to work fine a few years back.

    If HiDPI is on images will be important to half size. That's how 2 x HiDPI works. A 1600px by 600px image will appear at 800px of 300px Dimensions in Design view and on screens in standard resolution. On a screen HiDPI image will always be physically the same size on screen, but 1600 x 600 pixels will appear.

    How did make you the image in Muse? File > Place and click on the page will bring the image in original size, unless it would be much bigger than the size of your page (in which case Muse will resize itself it down to manageable dimensions). If the image is used as a background fill Image sizing is controlled by the fill parameters (i.e. the scale to adapt, evolve to fill, etc.).

    Regarding the scaling proportional, for better or worse, the default behavior in Muse is the resizing of the images is proportional. If you want the disproportionate scale (free style), then hold down the SHIFT key. Note that this applies to the placed images and the images in the slide show. It does not apply to elements with a background image fill.

Maybe you are looking for