Similar Questions

• Firefox is not always compatible with the connection to my comcast email account. I need to clear the cache, and then I can back into my email account. Is there a way to permanently solve this problem? Thank you.

  Firefox is not always compatible with the connection to my comcast email account. I need to clear the cache, and then I am able to get back into my email account. Is there a way to permanently solve this problem? Thank you.

  Clear the cache and cookies from sites that cause problems.

  "Clear the Cache":

  • Tools > Options > advanced > network > storage (Cache) offline: 'clear now '.

  'Delete Cookies' sites causing problems:

  • Tools > Options > privacy > Cookies: "show the Cookies".
  • https://support.Mozilla.com/kb/cannot+log+in+to+websites

• Two servers to connect internal using the virtual machine even in a swimming pool?

  I was deploying a pilot here VDI environment.  Working with the deployment with the planning guides, most things went smoothly.  However, in practice (and by the guides and information online) I learned that ultimately it works best to have two individual servers to connect internal (not replicated). a dedicated to access internal only, and the other coupled with a security server in the DMZ.

  My question is, can a system (physical workstation w / agent or VM) live in a resource pool manual for two managers of internal connections?  What is the best way to manage a scenario in which a worker would use a specific virtual machine during the day (and thus the internal connection manager), verus remotely using this same VM?

  Also, when you have a connection to Server 2, should a 2nd database of events created in SQL, or if it can share the same database of events?

  Thank you!

  sketchy00 wrote:

  However, in practice (and by the guides and information online) I learned that ultimately it works best to have two individual servers to connect internal (not replicated). a dedicated to access internal only, and the other coupled with a security server in the DMZ.

  Lol this is not correct. For a mode environment that supports both internal and external users, it is true that you should have one or more servers dedicated to the internal connection and one or more dedicated for external, but they should all work as a replica group. for example, to install the first as a standard instance and others as a replica instance. In this way, users can access the same pools they are internal and external, administration can be performed only once on the entire environment.

  Architecture and planning guide is a good reference.

  http://pubs.VMware.com/view-50/topic/com.VMware.ICbase/PDF/view-50-architecture-planning.PDF

  In particular, look at the diagram page 61 that shows this. All 4 connection servers are in the same group of replicated, then it will have been installed as a standard and others installed as replicas. Of course, you don't have to have 4 unless you have HA needs, you can have just two and so without balancing the load, but in all these cases, the connection servers share the configuration via the replication data.

  I hope this helps.

  Select this option.

• Allow customers to AnyConnect access to only a few servers when connected

  We have 30 teleworkers that we recently acquired that are put in place with the client AnyConnect to connect to our head of line ASA 5510. For security reasons, we must give them access to only 3 of our servers in-house, all our subnet 10.10.X.X/16. The remotes are published an address via DHCP on the SAA 10.10.50.X/24 when connecting. I thought it would be as simple as creating an access list, but have had no luck in doing so. In addition, we must allow them full access to the servers in a data center connected to our head even ASA via a site to site VPN, while they are connected using AnyConnect. Pointers would be appreciated.

  ASA version 8.3

  Thank you

  -Mike

  You have two choices. You can either apply the ACL as a tunnel of splitting ACL with Group Policy:

  split_tunnel list standard access allowed host 10.10.0.1

  split_tunnel list standard access allowed host 10.10.0.2

  split_tunnel list standard access allowed host 10.10.0.3

  !

  Group Policy GROUP attributes

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-network-list split_tunnel

  or you can apply ACLs as a vpn-filter o group policy:

  filter_vendor list standard access allowed host 10.10.0.1

  filter_vendor list standard access allowed host 10.10.0.2

  filter_vendor list standard access allowed host 10.10.0.3

  !

  Group Policy GROUP attributes

  VPN-filter value filter_vendor

• Connect to virtual machines across multiple servers of connection for internal/external access

  Hello everyone

  My apologies if this is a silly question, but is it possible to have an individual virtual machine or pool accessible through multiple connection servers? Here is my setup and my scenario:

  Connection to server 1 - direct connect active, PCoIP, serving internal users.

  Connection to Server 2 - live disabled connect, RDP, coupled with a security server, serving external users.

  We seek to deploy Wyse PocketCloud on Wireless / 3G iPad so support for users outside the campus of the hospital can access their desktop.  Users will be expected to have office in the same condition as when they were on campus.  Our doctors are attracted to the iPad, then this will be a test for future deployment phase.

  VMS users are controlled by cs 1.  I would like that the possibility for users to directly connect to their virtual machines using PCoIP when they are internal and RDP via security server when they are external.  Is it possible without using a VPN or live with disabilities on cs connect 1?  I tried to add a virtual machine that has already been setup on cs 1 CS 2 but once cs 2 picks up I can connect is no longer the virtual machine through cs 1. Servers will also relay the reconfigure virtual computer every minute, so this is not the right way to do this.  Someone had customers or users who wanted to make something similar to this?  If so, how did you manage?

  Thanks in advance for your comments

  View what version are you running?  In later versions, you can set directly relate to the level of the server.  So now you can simply deploy a replica of your main connection server that runs Live mode while having your other login server in indirect.   This way you can have a view environment and run your desired configuration.

  If you have found this device or any other useful post please consider the use of buttons useful/correct to award points

• Clone the virtual machine between two ESX 3.5.0 servers (low connection)

  Hi all!

  I have two ESX 3.5.0 servers that are managed by a vCenter servers one have just the connection of 32 KB.

  I need to clone one of my virtual machines from one to the other ESX is W2k8 created with 40 GB HARD drive. I tried to start it clone trough my low connection, but the task is about 86% for 4 days :|

  Is it possible to clone virtualmachine on one of my ESX for its local storage and after that, get it by vCenter for example an external HARD drive and then copy them all to my second ESX? How to run copied virtual machine on my second ESX? Maybe I can do it with another way - ideas?

  Two ESX are the same versions and machines, only the names and the ip addresses are different.

  Thanks for the tips

  Kris

  I don't think it is possible since the virtual disk will be 40 GB in size - I was suggesting using a laptop as a server NFS ESX sees and access the virtual machine for this storage clone - it take the first vessel of ESX host it to secondary site attach NFS datastore on the second ESX Server and using the browser of data store you navigate to the cloned VMX of VM file and to him the second ESX host - you can cold migrate leaving the second host and then move the cursor above for the storage you want.

  If you find this or any other answer useful please consider awarding points marking the answer correct or useful

• My DLNA servers do not work since the TWC connection.

  I had a Verizon Wireless modem/router... and Dlna My servers could Connect/stream my music/vids to my reader Blu - Ray sony fine without problems...

  Then I switched to TWC and they gave me a Motorola Modem and a router wireless Ubee wifi etc... Since this Server DLNA No. I try works
  I tried Servio/WMP/plex/few others...

  Ive disabled firewall router and windows and moy. So idk what happened... Ive been on google for weeks... but no method don't work...

  But yes my Bluray does not 1 of the Ive tried servers... I'm pretty sure that it is not an update I did.

  [EDIT}
  It turns out that some of my Services has not been updated, so I installed a fixer of Services.exe and now my network sharing lights up and stays on, now... Tested and functional lol... I feel stupid, please close this post

• vRops for Horizon broker Agent on NLB'd connection servers

  I install the vRops for components of the Horizon in my existing vRops v6.0.2 instance.  The big issue is the vRops for agent broker Horizon that goes on the display connection server.  In my case, I have two connection (a master and a replica) servers in a Windows NETWORK load balancing configuration.
  
  Can I just install the broker on the server of connection?  The documentation says a broker by pod, but is silent on a platform with a login server load-balanced.  If reviews are coming in one of the servers of connection load-balanced (the one who does not have the chance to have the vRops for agent Horizon on that), these measures View Client not getting sent to vRops?  I guess it's reasonable to assume that without measures to be sent at all if the connection to the server with the rRops for the agent of the Horizon is down altogether (for example, for maintenance or due to a failure).

  I guess that your design has a load balanced, and treats each individual IP host IP address.  You install the Agent to broker view on a single server connection by pod and point your adapter from the Horizon to the IP address of the IP system, rather than the load balanced IP.

  Display customer metric are sent directly from the view on the vROps Server Agent.

• WAN connection between security and connection of servers?

  Hi all

  one of our clients wants to place its servers view Horizon 5.2 security in remote data centers and servers to connect in their headquarters. They have two DMZ environments to hosting provider data centers and they want to fill it with 2 security servers each for redundancy. I have currently no accurate information on the speed and latency (and packet loss). I know that connection servers sharing the same ADLDS need connection to the LAN due to replication requirements strict, but what security servers?

  Can I put my security servers in a region far away and have them matched (and PCoIP routed by gateway) with servers to connect to Headquarters via a WAN connection?

  Kind regards

  Jacques.

  That's fine, as long as they have properly configured firewall rules, but I have to ask: what are they hoping to win this configuration - is-to-end latency lower and upper for remote users of the local data center and then goes on the link of the site, instead of going on the internet directly to the headquarters of the bandwidth?

• Join a new MD1000 to an MD3000 existing query

  I'm as confused as if I connect our new MD1000 to our exisiting MD3000 in unified mode or in shared mode. Our existing MD3000 has 2 controllers host at the back of the it. Our new MD1000 has a primary EMM and a secondary EMM. What I can do I connect the MD3000 the MD1000 in shared Mode by running a cable from the "in" on the primary EMM in the MD1000 to the available port in the first controller on the MD3000 host (slot 0) then by running a second cable from the 'in' on the secondary EMM in the MD1000 to the available port on the second controller on the MD3000 host (slot 1).

  Can you confirm that the above is what I have to do?

  Also looking at the requirements for adding the MD1000 it is mentioned that I need to have the following:

  "Developing an existing Md3000 with a new Md1000 chassis system".
  Follow these steps to fix a new MD1000 to an MD3000 existing extension
  attachment.
  NOTICE: The mode dial must be in the position of the mode "Uni" for the MD1000 chassis to function
  with the MD3000 chassis.
  1 on the MD3000 chassis, upgrade the controller to A01 or later software.
  2 on the host servers and the MD3000 system, follow these steps (in order) to upgrade
  components:
  an upgrade of the SAS 5/E driver and firmware. For Windows hosts, use the update package.
  For Linux hosts, use the DKMS package.
  b upgrade the Modular Disk Storage Manager on each host server. (The latest version is available
  from the support.dell.com site.) Refer to the Installation Guide of PowerVault MD3000 for further
  information.
  c upgrade pilots multichannel on each host server. Paths multiple drivers are provided with the
  Modular disk (MD) Storage Manager installation package.
  On Windows hosts, the drivers are installed automatically when you install MD Storage Manager
  in Full mode or host. On Linux hosts, you must install Multipath drivers manually.
  NOTICE: If you are prompted, restart the host servers during the upgrade process.
  3 once all components have been upgraded, to stop one or more hosts, then shut down the MD3000
  attachment.
  4 attach the MD1000 expansion on the MD3000 chassis, following the steps in the
  Dell PowerVault Compatibility Matrix (available from support.dell.com site). »

  Is there documentation that explains how to perform updates to the firmware on the MD3000 and the MD1000? Thank you.

  Doug

  The minimum to connect to a MD3000 is A03 and A04 later and came out for about 3 years now, so if you bought your speaker this year, it came with A04 already and the MD1000 itself should not need upgrades (drives in the MD1000 is another story, but you can not determine their firmware until you connect it to the MD3000).

• ORA-12170: TNS: Connect timeout occurred Description: an unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. P

  Hello

  I deployed a simple asp.net application in a sharepoint wfe Server

  Client 32-bit installed oracle 12

  32-bit Oracle Data Access Components (ODAC)
  with Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio

  bit alias 32 and 54 sql set up in all the sharepoit servers to connect to sql server

  SharePoint farm works very well

  ASP.net application to connect to sql server and oracle dbs to get and display the data

  in iis, asp.net application compatible 32-bit and executed under asp.net version 4.0

  When I connect to sql server and a data base of data it displays error below

  ORA-12170: TNS: Connect timeout occurred

  Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and its origin in the code.

  Exception details: System.Data.OleDb.OleDbException: ORA-12170: TNS: Connect timeout occurred

  Source error:

  Line 4142: Dim da2 as new OleDbDataAdapter (sqlStr2, conStr2)
  Line 4143: Dim ds2 As New DataSet
  Line 4144: da2. Fill (DS2)
  Line 4145:
  4146 line: DropDownList38.DataSource = ds2

  Source file: C:\inetpub\wwwroot\wss\VirtualDirectories\lxxxx\xxx.ascx.vb line: 4144

  Stack trace:

  a common cause of Timeout is a firewall on or between customer & dbserver

  What was the last time it worked without error?

  What has changed since then?

• Formatted VMFS3 ISCSI data warehouses are compatible with ESX5.5?

  Hi all

  I'm currently building an ESX 5.5 environment to run in parallel with my environment 4.1 existing and need the new 5.5 ESX servers to connect via iSCSI to a couple of VMFS3 formatted lun.

  I can't see them via the iSCSI storage adapter, but when I try to mount it asks me to format first. I wanted to confirm if anyone else had this problem or has confirmed that VMFS3 is fully compatible with ESX 5.5 connected via iSCSI.

  Thanks in advance.

  Looks like that the MTU on my NICs is set too high. Once I lowered around 1500, they began to present correct data warehouses.

  Thanks for the help, I think I have a handle on it.

  Thank you, MP.

• Customer display 5.0.0 and compatibility view connection server 5.1

  Curently we run see 5.0.0 eviorment but we are planing an upgrade in 5.1 mode and I'm a little confused abut compatibility view 5.1 server connection and view customer 5.0.0.

  Here in this compatibility matrix, it seems that customer 5.0.0 and 5.1 server are compatible.

  
  And here, in this compatibility matrix, it looks like this only 5.01 client is compatible with Server 5.1

  

  So if I upgrade the servers to connect to 5.1 will be users with 5.0.0 customers still able to connect to their desktop?

  Best regards, Primoz

  Customer display 5.0 is compatible with the 5.1 server connection; However, the 4.x clients are not. That's what you see above.

• External hard drive compatible with 10.5.8 os

  Hi, I have an old 2009 iMac 2.4 ghz processor intel core 2 double running 10.5.8. I want to update the snow leopard operating system.

  Ive been told to should save my system before you install the update... but I can't find an external hard drive that compatible with 10.5.8... suggestions any? (seagate / WD?)

  James NZ

  Hard drives must be compatible with the connection port on a computer, not with an operating system. You can use any external HARD drive that can be connected by Firewire and USB ports on the computer.

• iMac does not connect to the Internet.

  I checked my network connections, and he said: I am connected to wifi and ethernet. However, I can not load safari, chrome, Firefox, iTunes, appstore or my girls playing minecraft. I think it has to do with my wifi or Ethernet, because the same things happen on my iPhone when connected to wifi. But then again, when I disabled my wifi on my computer it still does not work. I became very impatient with this because we can not load a update system or Apple.com! I deleted cookies and the data of the Web site, restarted and shut down completely, replaced by OpenDNS servers and connected through other users of accounts. We've even cleared up little space on our computer. We have planned the download CleanMyMac if that was the problem but we can not even on the site.

  DOWNLOAD NOT clean my Mac, this is one of the worst pieces of available crapware.

  Now, that said, try the steps here use Diagnostics wireless for you help to solve the problems of Wi-Fi on your Mac - Apple Support