Performance of Windows 7 and the differences of 32 and 64-bit...

Similar Questions

• Essbase Excel add-in on 64-bit Windows 7 and 64-bit Office 2010

  Hello world
  
  I installed 11.1.2.2 on server with Essbase and Shared Services.
  
  Now, on the client, I have 64-bit Windows 7 and 64-bit office 2010.
  
  I tried to install the Excel Addin client only (without customer Essbase) and restarted the computer after installation.
  After that install addin not launched automatically and I tried to manually set the add-in, I get an error "is not a valid add-in.
  
  Is this because I use 64-bit office and need to revert to 32-bit.
  is not supported for the last 11.1.2.2 Essbase 64-bit?
  
  Any ideas or experience in this regard will be useful to me that our society is underway for Windows 7 and Office 2010 through the users and if 64-bit Office is not supported or has problems, I wanted them to go with 32-bit Office 2010.
  
  Thank you.

  Have a read of http://essbaselabs.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/smart-view-64-bit-office-support.html

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• mutex slow performance in windows xp on the host ESX 5 prompt

  I've done a few consumer casual producer marks written in C with visual studio 2005 on dual core 2 ghz cpu, with processor type and identical win xp professional o.s., it seems to me on ESX, execution mutex, events and corresponding waitforsingleobject is 1/10th to 1/2 the speed on the physical machine, Windows 7 instead the performance is about half of the corresponding physical machine I was wondering if anyone else noticed, this is perhaps due to how mutex/criticism sections/events/semaphores are emulated in the ESX binary translation, there are all the settings of windows xp 32 bits comments under ESX 5 to allow especially stimulate the sync speed of process/thread to make it similar to a physical machine may?

  I am attaching a small test project for vs 2005 in case anyone could take the trouble to try and compare the pure speed of physical synchronization primitives and ESX especially if in win xp there is a penalty of macroscopic speed or maybe I did something wrong as I ran the test on an overloaded perhaps ESX.

  gf111 wrote:

  Is it possible to wake up another process in win xp without incurring TPR registry bashing?

  I do not know.  It is not clear to me why Windows wants to change the TPR in the first place.  The TPR is to block external interruptions, and I see not why Windows would change the external interrupts are blocked, according to what level process user is active.

  I noticed that windows 7 synchronization is much faster on the same ESX with FlexPriority probably not activated, likely due to 'Lazy TPR', which I believe has been implemented in o.s. later than xp, so I guess that the more realistic prospect is to go with win 7, given I don't think that in my particular environment , I'm working on they would be willing to risk life and limb with potentially unstable FlexPriority bios patcher, has taken the fact that xp is end of life taken into charge anyway, but thanks for giving me a clue what may happen anyway.

  Windows XP 64-bit is another option.  He always denigrated on the TPR, but uses instead of MMIO CR8. (AMD hotfix did the same thing with an ISA AMD extension that allows the code to 32-bit access CR8.)

  Note also that FlexPriority is not a panacea.  It can reduce the cost of a TPR of 2000 update ~ cycles to ~ 400 cycles, but it is still far from what it costs in native mode, which is of ~ 2 cycles.

  Binary translation, TPR updates are rather cheap, but BT has its own performance issues.

  Your Windows XP guest running with binary translation or hardware-assisted virtualization?  You can check the file for 'HV Settings' vmware.log know.

• Incompatibility of Windows 7 and 32-bit

  I have a new laptop PavillionDV6T, running windows 7 and some of my previous 32-bit discs are not compatible. I was advised to upgrade to the professional version, what I did, but still get the message that the program is not compatible.

  W7 64-bit has a 32-bit subsystem, then this would not be the problem, what type of program (s) is?

  Probably the reason that you were asked to upgrade to Pro had to install XP mode, allows you to run older allpications XP on a Windows 7 PC.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/Virtual-PC/Download.aspx

• I can't download Windows updates or updates of Windows Defender, and my BITS will not start.

  Hi, I have a HP Pavilion dv4 Notebook PC, and I can't get my updates of windows to download anything. My BITS will not start.

  -Processor: Intel (r) Core (TM) 2 Duo CPU
  At 2.10 GHz, 2.10 GHz T6500
  -Memory (RAM): 4.00 GB
  -System type: 64-bit operating system
  -Windows Vista Home Premium Edition
  -Service Pack 2

  I have Webroot AntiVirus with Spy Sweeper and I recently downloaded the Malewarebytes Malware Anti.

  Whenever I try to download an update for anything, be it Itunes, Windows Defender, Windows updates, updates to HP or Microsoft Updates, they do not always arrive.

  When I go into the service menu & try to start BITS it comes up with this message:

  Windows cannot start the Service on the Local computer's Background Intelligent Transfer
  Error 126: The specified module is not found.

  When the updates of Windows fails to download updates, it comes up with the error Code: 80246008.

  I tried to download on microsoft.com BITS Repair tool, but it is said that the tool is not necessary.

  I really need someone to help me and to understand this point for me, it's happened now for about 3 months. When I bought the laptop I had Webroot AntiVirus with Spy Sweeper installed, and I just installed Malwarebytes' Anti Malware, a week ago.

  Anyway, do the following:

  1. download the Norton Removal Tool, save it to your desktop: ftp://ftp.symantec.com/public/english_us_canada/removal_tools/Norton_Removal_Tool.exe

  1B. download the tool McAfee Consumer Product Removal, save it to your desktop: http://download.mcafee.com/products/licensed/cust_support_patches/MCPR.exe

  2. close all open applications (that is, anything with an icon on the taskbar).

  3. click right on the file saved in # 1 above, and then select run as administrator to run the utility. DO TAP not your keyboard until the race ends, then restart.

  4. click right on the file saved in # 1 b above, and then select run as administrator to run the utility. DO TAP not your keyboard until the race ends, then reboot again.

  5 test.

  ~ Robear Dyer (PA Bear) ~ MS MVP (that is to say, mail, security, Windows & Update Services) since 2002 ~ WARNING: MS MVPs represent or work for Microsoft

• Satellite A100 - need tools for Windows 7 and 64-bit drivers

  Hello

  I have W7 RTM from Technet, and I install 64-bit edition on my laptop ' Satellite A100 (PSAA9) "I need 64-bit drivers and 64 bit utility (value added package..), but I can't find them... value added 32-bit package does not work on 64-bit (installation is rejected) :/"

  Sorry, my English is very very bad

  Thanks for the tips

  I do not think that you will have success installing Win7 64 bit on an old system as the A100, you should install 32 bit Win7 and use Vista 32-bit drivers.

• will I get the improved performance on windows xp using the pagefile in enhanced USB flash

  Lenovo 3000 J200 512 MB RAM slow operation with the new installation of windows.

  How do I do this

  Are you talking about something like ReadyBoost?

  http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/ReadyBoost

  That feature (and SuperFetch) are not available in XP.

  My opinion is that unless you know more about managing memory than XP, you must set the option for the paging file to the size of the managed system and just let XP take care of things.

  I read somewhere that there are none or only a performance problem minute if you can get the page file to XP on a USB key.  Keep in mind that flash drives will also be "usury" after a number of cycles of read/write so who knows how long to set up your continue to operate reliably if you were beat your USB device, day and night.

  If your system is slow, you must define what slow means for you and provide more details on your system.

  If you think that it starts too slowly: for example, I would use some software tools to measure boot time to the millisecond so that you can see exactly how long it takes, make some adjustments and measure again to see if things improve.  It allows to eliminate the human element of subjectivity in the matter.

  For example, I know that it takes my system exactly 24.03.024 seconds to start, but I have zero startup items configured at boot time.  Maybe this isn't the right configuration to everyone, but I'm all about the search for better performance.

  If your Lenovo will have more RAM, I would consider that.  512 MB is not a lot and RAM is relatively expensive, these days, and who would probably be on the best thing you could do for your system.  I can run XP with 256 MB, very good (but a bit slow), but more RAM is usually better - seek 2-4 GB if you can rotate.

  If you want someone to watch you have, follow these steps:

  Provide information on your system, the better you can:

  What is your Version of XP and the Service Pack?

  Your system have IDE or SATA disks?

  Describe your current antivirus and software anti malware situation: McAfee, Symantec, Norton, Spybot, AVG, Avira!, MSE, Panda, Trend Micro, CA, Defender, ZoneAlarm, PC Tools, Comodo, etc..

  Now make some clarifications:

  Click Start, run and enter in the box:

  Msinfo32

  Click OK, and when the system info summary appears, click on edit, select all (Ctrl-A), copy (Ctrl-C) and paste (Ctrl-V) the information back here.

  For information about video drivers, expand components, click view, click on edit, select all, copy and then paste the information here.

  I have a list of your startup items will also help.  Here's a way to do it:

  So tell us what are all your startup items and we will help you to look at to see if there are some that you may not need.

  Here's a way to provide a list of your startup items:

  Download and install CCleaner here:

  http://www.Piriform.com/CCleaner

  Launch CCleaner, click on tools, startup and at the bottom right of the screen, click on the button "Save to text file" to save the startup information in a text file (name it something like startup.txt, so you can find it).

  Save the information to your desktop (or somewhere you can find it) start, open the text file with a text editor, select all of the text copy (Ctrl-A) it
  (Ctrl-C) and paste (Ctrl + V) the contents of the startup list of back here for analysis.

  Uninstall CCleaner later if you don't like (most people seem to like for it of other features).

  Here's what my startup.txt file looks like:

  That's right - I have zero startup items.  Maybe this isn't the right configuration to everyone, but I'm all about the search for better performance.

• Windows 8 and 128-bit cpu

  Hello.

  I buy a laptop. but I have question.

  I've got my friend lesson: Windows 8 only Support 128 bit processor. Is it really?

  Computers will not go 128 bit very very very long time...

  A 32-bit address register means that 4 GB ofRAM or 2³² addresses. It's the MAXIMUM THEORETICAL TOTAL AMOUNT OF MEMORY a 32-bit system can handle. So if you have 32 bit and you have 4 GB or RAM and 512 MB GPU RAm, your computer will use only 3.5 GB of RAM for the main system... TOTAL OF 4 GB. The 4 GB max has been implemented on almost all 32-bit systems...

  64-bit, however, is not this double... Infact it does much more than that... currently on windows 7/vista, I think that the maximum memory is 192GO (this is only if you have the teacher/enter/ultimate) If you have the Starter/Home Edition it's 8 GB if you have Home Premium is 16 GB

  The theoretical MAXIMUM for 64 - bit is actually 16 EXABYTES. 1 GB = 2 ^ 30 an exabyte is 2 ^ 60... now to give you another kind of referance what size an exabyte is really... 'In March 2010^[UPDATE] , the overall monthly Internet traffic is estimated at 21 exabytes'

  So I guess to answer your question... don't listen to your friend, he doesn't know what he's talking about. I've never even heard of a 128-bit processor. I've never heard of Windows 8. And all modern laptops will run vista or windows 7. Your CPU will most likely be 64 and 32 compatible (if the computer has been made in the last 3 years) Windows is 64 or 32-bit, but if you have the 64-bit, as I do, then 32-bit applications still works fine... But in theory, you can get more performance from a 64-bit application/software. The main reason to get a 64 bit version of windows in my opinion is to allow more than 4 GB of memory on your system.

• Flash said Adobe installed but isn; t windows 7 and 64 bit cpu

  Hello, I tried to download Adobe latest flash; I click on the Finnish window and says program installed but no go. If I try to use youtube or I.Player say error message says I need to install Adobe flash. Thank you

  Sandeep thank you sorry for the late reply, but I found it, that is, flash has been blocked. Arranged, again. Tom

• I have Windows XP and my PC gets slower and slower

  I have Windows XP and my PC gets slower and slower

  Well, if you have a slow computer experience, it is a serious performance problem.

  There may be several reasons for the performance decline computer day after day, most common are the following:
  -Inadequate system or RAM, memory
  -Too many unnecessary things and fragmented in the computer files
  -Programs that run in the background and consuming system resources
  -Activity, virus, Spyware and Malware
  -Several Antivirus running in the system

  I guess if your computer worked well at the beginning means that you have good amount of system memory or RAM memory, but it is recommended to increase. Otherwise, you can do away with the increase in the virtual memory or paging file.
  Right click on my computer go Properties. In the System Properties window go to the Advanced tab.
  Now, click on the settings buttons in Performance. The Performance Options window click on the Advanced tab again and you will see the virtual memory down. Click on change. Now, you can keep it managed system or Custom. If you use the custom, then make sure that the initial size is 1.5 times the physical memory is actual and the maximum size is 3 x times.
  Then apply and close all windows and restart the computer, note any change in performance.

  To clean all the unwanted files just use the disk cleanup utility, it will clean up all unwanted computer junk files. Then you can go ahead and use Disk Defragmenter to defragment all the files fragmented in the c: Drive.

  Prevention of the execution of unwanted programs must be done with caution. Sometimes programs load automatically whenever the computer is turned on these programs to continue to run in the background and consume system resources. The best thing to do is to stop them from loading automatically. Click START and then click RUN. RUN window opens upward, in the type of window run msconfig, system configuration window opens. Click on the last tab that says startup. You will see the list and most of them will have a check. First of all to uncheck all the, then control selectively the most important like your Antivirus, Internet connection, modem, another important application driver tool that may be necessary. You can hardly but understand that those check must sound familiar to you. Apply and then restart the computer. When the computer restarts, you will see a prompt that saya that you have used the System Configuration utility. Simple uncheck the box at the bottom and click OK. Notice the change in system performance.

  If you run more thn an Antivirus, make sure you uninstall one. Since then, most of the antiviruses have a real-time scanner or resident shield that consumes some system resources, using several will cause more consumption of system resources. Subsequently, slow down the computer.

  If all of the above does little to improve the performance of the Virus issue might have to be declared. However, let me know and we'll do something if it's a virus problem.

• Difference between SOA Suite 64 Bit and SOA Suite 32 Bit

  Hello

  I'm new to SOA. I want to install SOA Suite 64 Bit on my laptop with 64-bit system and a window 8 64-bit.

  I'm curious to know what what is the difference between SOA Suite 64 Bit and SOA Suite 32 Bit.

  There are various facilities available for the 64-bit and 32-bit?

  Or

  The facilities are same for 64-bit and 32-bit, but it's only depends on whether the JDK is 64-bit or 32-bit.

  Thank you

  Prashant jegou

  Hi Prashant, there.

  If you use the JDK that is bundled with WLS, I think that you have installed 32 - bit.

  The best way to check is to run java-version on the prompt of the JDK that helps run the suite servers SOA. Another approach is to examine the server log and files where the start is unloaded and you should be able to see the seller of the JVM and architecture.

  To install WLS 64-bit, you must use the generic installation program (.jar) which requires a JDK 64 - bit pre-installed. And then on top, with installation of SOA.

  I never tried to SOA on 32-bit and I think that it is not stable at all due to the limited segment size you can allocate for the JVM.

  Hope this helps,

  Anatoli

• The Windows 7 for P1007 driver will work on 64-bit Windows 8?

  Can use the printer driver Windows 7 for the Laserjet P1007 on a 64-bit system of Windows 8 - otherwise, when the driver of Windows 8 will be available?

  Hi CherylSan,

  I think some of my previous tests that it will work. Give it a shot and let me know what happens?

  Base driver HP LaserJet Hostbased Plug-and-Play

• 64-bit and 16-bit Windows 8 compatibility

  If Windows 8 64-bit is not 16-bit compatibility. Is there anyway that I can do so it has compatibility? I'm trying to run an old program plan that runs on windows XP and 16 - Bit editing

  This is true of Windows 8 64 bit as well: the 16-bit programs only are not supported, because they are so old. Microsoft cannot continue to support all for always. You have two options:

  You could dual-boot with a 32 bit OS - that would let you run Windows 8 or switch to XP to run the card program. You always have your copy of XP?

  You could downgrade Win8 to 32 bits, which could allow you to run the program, but this is an extreme solution for a single program. There is also still no guarantee that the program would work.

  You could do a 'virtual machine' in Virtualbox, which would allow you to run Windows XP inside of Windows 8, and you can run the card on that program. That's actually what I would say.

  There are ways to run your program, but none of them are simple, quick solutions and easy, I'm afraid.

• What is the difference between my "reinstallation DVD' and a 'Windows Vista Installation disk'

  In a thread on repair Vista (link below), "a real Windows Vista Installation disc" has been claimed. Laptop Dell Inspiron 1525, my wife took a Dell DVD "Reinstalling Windows Vista Home Premium 32 BIT SP1 - DVD".

  Are they equivalent?

  Virve
  --
  (http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vistarepair/thread/61769574-0b39-46cb-ac28-5352e503d5a2/)

  In general, yes your reinstall Dell drive is identical to a disc to install Windows genuine.

  The differences are not applicable for the repair procedure. (FYI - Toshiba and HP Vista, the disks cannot be used to perform a repair install, while gateway disks will work for Vista)

  -John ( http://www.carrona.org/index.html )

• new hard drive - what is the difference in performance between the new installation of Windows 7 or a clone of old hard drive?

  I get a new hard Hard Drive (SSD).  The new disc is the same size as my existing SATA drive.  I can do either a new

  the installation of Windows 7 or a clone old hard drive?  I would prefer to clone the old hard drive and keep all my settings, etc.   It's empirical data on the performance difference between a new installation of Windows 7 or to continue with the Windows 7 which was 3 or 4 years ago.

  I know the conventional wisdom is that the new installation is faster, but, no matter who actually tested and compared the differences?  I know I'll get better performance of the SSD the SATA drive, but I don't know if it's worth the hassle to do a fresh install and redo all my programs and settings.

  Others that the performance of the SSD you should not see any differences.  If you do, you can always do a clean installation later.