performance on the VMS problem

Similar Questions

• Performance using the virtualization problem

  If we compare our software installed in a physical host and a comparable VM (same CPU, memory), we notice that the product is twice slower when running in a virtual machine (guest operating system is Windows 2003, the use of an ESXi 4.0 host. The software uses a single CPU)

  As we are not in the production environment, we tried with all other VM turned off. We tested our VM with and without reserve of CPU (best results with), with and without memory (absolutely no difference) and 1, 2 and 4 vCPU

  After several tests, it seems that the problem comes from the use of semaphores: when replacing them with critical sections (but we cannot just replace), the performances are quite the same between the physical host and the virtual machine. All the code is executed with similar performance, but when using semaphores, the VM uses longer than the physical host CPU.

  Someone at - it something on such a problem ears already? Is there a reason to explain the poor performance when using semaphores Windows hosted by ESXi 4.0?

  For example, we wrote a simple program to compare hosted by ESX Windows semaphores (in our laboratory, it took 10 sec on a physical host and 22sec in a virtual machine):

  #include "stdafx.h".

  int _tmain (int argc, _TCHAR * argv)

  {

  unsigned __int64 nCount;

  NTickCount = DWORD: GetTickCount();

  HANDLE hSemaphoreBridgets = CreateSemaphore (NULL, 1, 1, NULL);

  for (nCount = 0; nCount < 10000000; ++ nCount)

  {

  WaitForSingleObject (hSemaphoreBridgets, INFINITE);

  ReleaseSemaphore (hSemaphoreBridgets, 1, NULL);

  }

  printf ("%d s\r\n duration", (: GetTickCount() - nTickCount) / 1000);

  CloseHandle (hSemaphoreBridgets);

  return 0;

  }

  I have your reference of profiling and found that he spends most of his time in these three Windows HAL functions:

  HAL 39.83%! KfLowerIrql

  HAL 19,82%! KeRaiseIrqlToDpcLevel

  19.07% hal! KeRaiseIrqlToSynchLevel

  Hot spots in each function are the access TPR (0FFFE0080h is the address of the TPR in the local APIC):

  HAL! KfLowerIrql:

  807168e4 890d8000feff mov dword ptr ds:------[0FFFE0080h], ecx

  807168ea a18000feff mov eax, dword ptr ds:-[FFFE0080h]

  HAL! KeRaiseIrqlToDpcLevel:

  807168a 0 8b158000feff mov edx, dword ptr ds:-[0FFFE0080h]

  807168a 6 c7058000feff41000000 mov dword ptr ds:------[0FFFE0080h], 41 h

  HAL! KeRaiseIrqlToSynchLevel:

  807168bc 8b158000feff mov edx, dword ptr ds:-[0FFFE0080h]

  807168c 2 c7058000feff41000000 mov dword ptr ds:------[0FFFE0080h], 41 h

  Since the local APIC is virtualized, TPR access usually causes a VM exit under hardware virtualization.  However, Intel has introduced FlexPriority, which prevents the release of the virtual computer for all TPR readings and some TPR Scriptures.  For this reason, ESX 4.0 by default x - VT for 32-bit Windows 2003 on Intel FlexPriority chips.  Unfortunately, FlexPriority isn't a panacea.  On native hardware, TPR access are usually only a few cycles.  With FlexPriority, TPR access which do not cause a VM output may still take hundreds of cycles.  Access TPR cause VM-output take several cycles of a thousand.  Fortunately, we still have the possibility to use binary translation.  Under the binary translation, TPR access usually take dozens of cycles.

  For this particular workload, you must configure your client to use binary translation.  On my system of Penryn, benchmark runs in 22 seconds using VT - x (with FlexPriority), but it takes 13 seconds using the binary translation.  (For completeness, it takes 90 seconds using VT - x without FlexPriority).

  Your client's situation is different.  AMD has never introduced an equivalent to FlexPriority technology.  However, if your customer has configured their VM to use the material support of the MMU, then the virtual computer will use AMD - V, which suffers from the same problems that VT - x without FlexPriority.  Make sure they have configured computer virtual for the MMU software support so that it runs using the binary translation. (For this guest under ESX 3.5 default execution mode is binary translation).

• Network on the VMS problem guests on nested Hyper-V on ESXi 5.5

  Nesting of virtualization is already complicated, now, I hope that my subject of this discussion is not too complicated.

  Server: Dell PowerEdge R730 double E2640

  • External hypervisor: ESXi 5.5.0u2 (Dell custom image, installed on the server), 4 (NIC0, NIC1 in use) network interface cards
    • Management IP address 10.200.200.9/ subnet mask: 255.255.255.0 / Gateway: 10.200.200.1
  • Inner hypervisor: Windows Server 2012 R2 Datacenter, using 2 network cards virtual x E1000E
    • IP 10.200.200.10 (for BONES)
    • IP 10.200.200.11 (for guest virtual machines)

  
  

  Basically, I followed the instructions to create a new virtual machine with Virtual hardware version 10, edit the vmx file, allocate and reserve the 64 GB of RAM with 8 vCPU for Windows Server,

  VHV. Enable = "TRUE".

  Hypervisor.CPUID.v0 = "FALSE".

  MCE. Enable = "TRUE".

  At this point, everything works fine- I am able to install the Windows server 2012 R2 with Hyper-V feature. I also installed VMware Tools on this 2012 Windows Hyper-V, datacenter arrived at the field, ran iSCSI to connect to our NAS and restarted the hyper-V without problem on ESXi.

  
  
  

  But when I try to install a new guest VM in Hyper-V, the network does not work properly.

  I install a Windows Standard 2012 on Hyper-V (the inner hypervisor) without problem and the guest that OS Gets a 10.200.200.86 IP address (assigned by DHCP on the same subnet)

  This guest operating system, I am able to ping it's computer Hyper-V host 1st layer (10.200.200.10 and 10.200.200.11) and 2nd ESXi host (10.200.200.9), but the impossibility of joining as a result of gateway (10.200.200.1).
  

  And of course, I received an exclamation sign on the network icon in the taskbar of the 2012 Windows standard saying 'no internet connection '.

  * I was always able to join this Windows 2012 Std comments to the domain.

  No existingon the same subnet is an another Hyper-V on server physical hosting multiple virtual machines of comments including the controller of field and the DHCP servers, etc.

  
  

  I tried using PCIe with the Dell Server NIC3 pass through, but it crashed the ESXi and gave me an IERR (CPU 1 error) error message on my screen front of server Dell

  I ended up not using pass-through PCIe (although I really want to use if this solves my problem), because I learned that it can cause problems with other discussion threads Intel processors.

  Also, does anyone have similar problems? What did you do to fix this? I have been stuck for days not being is not able to connect guest VM in internet...

  My goals for this configuration are

  (1) simplify my strategy of VM backup (backup only the Hyper-V 2012 to capture all the parameters of the virtual machine)

  (2) maintain the real guest VMs on the NAS.

  (3) use this new Hyper-V with another Hyper-V (on another old physical server, are not nested) to provide high availability

  Andrew

  You have activated the Promiscuous Mode on your ESXi host vSphere vSwitch? Have a look here: http://vblog.is/?p=94

• Cube Performance for the Refresh problem

  We are facing a strange performance problem with the refresh of the cube. The cube that would take 1 HR to update takes about 3.5 to 4 hours without any change in the environment. In addition, the data it processes are almost the same before and now. Only these cube out of all of the cubes in the workspace suffers the problem of performance over a period of time.
  
  Details of the cube:
  This cube has 7 dimensions and 11 measures (mixture of sum and avg as grouping algorithm). No compression. Cube is partitioned (48 partitions). Main source of data is a materialized view that is partitioned in the same way as the cube.
  
  Data volume: 2480261 records in the source to deal with everyday (almost evenly distributed across the partition)
  
  Cube is refreshed with the script below
  
  DBMS_CUBE. BUILD (< < cube_name > >, 'SS', 5, false, true, false, true);
  
  Has anyone faced a similar question? Please can advise on what could be the cause of performance degradation.
  
  Environment - Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0
  MN - awm11.2.0.2.0A

  Records are recorded in CUBE_BUILD_LOG if you generate from DBMS_CUBE. BUILD or AWM. (The situation for CUBE_REJECTED_RECORDS is different).

  Maybe you build another schema? Records are sent to the CUBE_BUILD_LOG table in the schema of the invoker, not the AW patterns. For example, if you have an AW in the SCOTT schema and run the DBMS_CUBE. BUILD connected call as SCOTT, then all the log records will be inserted in SCOTT. CUBE_BUILD_LOG. But if you run DBMS_CUBE. BUILD connected as certain master pattern, say OLAPDBA, then the folders would be added in OLAPDBA. CUBE_BUILD_LOG. In both cases if the table does not exist, then the construction will continue without error (and connect).

  On the slowdown in general construction, have you tried the cube of compensation and rebuild from scratch? If you have visited additional charges running for awhile, then can slow down the performance of cube generation. Think about the fragmentation of the disk, and you get the basic idea.

• Driver went on a pad and perform a system restore, the hardware is not installed but the same problem.

  I have Vista Home Basic. I have a HP printer that whenever I logged in re-installed drivers. So I decided to uninstall all printer and software and re-install fresh. All seemed well and good work but if I restart or stop and come back on the laptop tells me a driver went on a buffer and performs a restore of the system. The system restore seems to work and restores me awhile before I re-installed the printer. But again if I restart or stop it has the same problem. the pilot and buffer. I have not yet installed or reconnect the printer because it restored. I don't know much about computers and I don't know what to do. I wanted to kind of do a clean install of Vista but it comes preinstalled on my laptop so I don't have a disk and that I read removing the drivers does not seem an option.

  Hi ChristopherParvin,

  You did it happen any changes made to the computer before the show?

  Method 1: Try the following steps.
  a. log in your computer using an administrator account.
  b. Click Start and then click Run.
  (c) in the Open box, type regedit and then click OK.
  d. Locate and click the following registry key:
  HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Enum\LPTENUM5. Right click on the registry key and then click on remove.
  e. under confirm delete key, click Yes.
  f. close the registry editor and restart your computer.
  
  Important: this section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click the following article: back up the registry in Windows 7

  Method 2: I suggest to install the drivers of clean boot and then restart the computer and check if the problem persists.

  How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

  Note: follow step 7 of section of boot KB929135 to the computer in normal mode.

  Method 3:
  Printer in Windows problems
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/printer-problems-in-Windows

  Tips for solving common driver problems
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/tips-for-fixing-common-driver-problems

• Problems of huge performance with the list of scrolling on the Playbook (especially Air applications)

  Hello

  It is more of a general question but also for the development of Air for the Playbook and other devices BB10.

  My Playbook has huge performance problems when it comes to scrolling lists.

  And this problem exists with almost all applications (not the ones that I have developed).

  For example, take a look at the app NTV - such its bad, its almost unusable because it's so late when scrolling lists.

  I don't know how this app was developed, but I guess it's Webworks or Air.

  You can see this delay also in the official app of Facebook: it's the same poor performance when it comes to scrolling.

  I guess this Facebook app is also WebWorks or Air.

  So Air or usable at all WebWorks?

  This performance is not fun, and it has no sense to develop applications with this platforms if these performance issues are of type platform.

  Now, my question is - is it true that the only platform that "really works at all" (about performance) is the native "platform"?

  Or is it a problem in the current version of the Playbook OS?

  Else you have noticed that this operation met during the scrolling of lists?

  Thank you

  Bullety

  It's a question AIR, specifically made software. All of the applications you listed are AIR. Try something like Scrapbook, and you see things how smooth can be (waterfalls).

  I saw not the same problems when using WebWorks with Sencha Touch. It is also quite possible to make things smooth in the NDK with waterfalls, but it's only for BB10 (for developers non - RIM). So cannot use it PB BB10 release (end of 2012).

  I also note that the new fuse QNX user interface components are much smoother than conventional QNX UI components. If you use make sure you air that you use.

• CS4 and performance with the Radeon HD 4670 problems

  I just updated my graphics to Embedded Intel G41 for a Sapphire HD 4670 512 MB GDDR3 card. While there certainly improves the General performance of the PC it leaves first faced, with video performance WORSE than the Intel. The video of the timeline is aweful - stuttering and jerky. I used to use the HDMI output to a HD of Hitachi TV with a resolution of 1440 x 900. It is a little choppy, but overall not too bad. Now, it's really bad.

  My spec is complete:

  PC with custom:

  Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit

  Intel E6300 2.8 ghz Dual - Core CPU

  Corsair 4 GB RAM

  3 x SATA hard drives

  POWER 450W

  Can someone advise me what I please. I bought this card for £58. Well above that is not an option.

  UPDATE:

  I have to say that I want to say is that to happen when I go to playback settings - reading in real-time - external device: and select the Hitachi. If I choose 'None', then it is fine, but only plays back in the monitor of CS4 window. I could use Hitachi okay with graphic edge.

  Post edited by: Funky monk

  9.12 to uninstall, reboot, install 9.11 from here.

• (Interrupted) poor disk i/o on the VMS during file transfers

  Hi - I'm a newbie to vSphere useage. My apologies if this is obvious...!

  What overall behavior we are seeing?

  -Transfer speeds of slow file between given VM and a remote computer

  -VMs periodically freezes on the command-line ssh connection

  What tests have been done and what were the results?

  -Download wget via known connection 100 Mbps-> transfer speed is very low and has declined steadily, vmstat suggests the VM freezes when it writes the data in the buffer to disk

  -transfer of physical machine to the virtual machine is much slower than expected, speed decreases and then increases after a period of time - there seems to be a total blockage of the I/O for about 5 minutes, during the transfer of large files

  -write speed disc shows 19 Mbps

  -before install us VM we receive transfers to all about 95Mbps between machines on the network and almost as good from remote machines with good pipes to their end

  NB during those tests, no intensive activity happening on any of the other virtual machines. During the normal use of all virtual machines, at least 2 if not all virtual machines become so slow as to be unusable.

  We have a kit that we think should be more than enough.

  We organise four VM (linux, CentOS).

  Most of the work of the virtual machine will occur will be file transfers to/from the VM and the LAN to the host or remote device via the internet.

  Files will be read or written in a/Import/Storage location in the virtual disks - storage is on the host machine.

  File transfers are made by using proprietary WAN acceleration software that is proven to get 95% of the bandwidth available on UDP transfer.

  File transfers will sometimes also be TCP or HTTP.

  Maybe we did a few obvious errors or omissions in our allocation of resources or the configuration of our kit. However, it is very frustrating because the performance sometimes makes the virtual machine unusable.

  I'm after pointers as to what we must try to work again then, or what we should have checked that we do not have. Thank you!

  Detail:

  Model of host machine:

  HPDL360

  Intel Xeon 5504 (2.0 GHz) with 4 cores

  4Gio RAM

  Records of host machine:

  2 x 330 GB SAS

  RAID 1

  (NB would have previously implemented us a host with the specifications below using 2 × 500 GB 7 .2kRPM SATA disks but became poor i/o performance, so we increased the specification according to retail but still see questions.)

  Type of disk controller:

  HP P410i RAID built-in, no cache or battery

  Available called bandwidth:

  100 Mbps

  ESXi version on the host: 4.1.0_260247

  Virtual machines:

  The host contains 4 VM.

  Each virtual machine uses Centos 5.5 (2.6.18 - 194.32.1.el5)

  set resource pools 4 up on the host, each containing a VM, each pool configured identically as follows;

  CPU resources;

  Actions: Normal (4000 in gray)

  Booking: 1609 extensible MHz

  Limit the 6500 Mhz (in gray) unlimited

  Memory resources:

  Actions: Normal

  Booking: 3375 MB expandable

  Limit 13500 unlimited (dimmed) MB

  A VM in each pool, no resource options defined on the computer level or by default, the values apply as follows: allocation of resources;

  Actions: Normal 1000 (in gray)

  Reservation: 0 MHz

  Limit 2000MHx unlimited

  I've also attached a document with screenshots of the performance of the host and the VM that is involved in the transfer to show the fall of IO mi transfer performance. It can be reproduced to a certain extent.

  You need a controller with battery backup write cache and this active (write), simple as that.  Perhaps there is also a duplex problem if expaining slow transfers of the box - check the ports on the switch and natachasery in vSphere Client all show good negotiation.

• The operation cannot be performed because the "Firefox" element is in use.

  Whenever I try to download the latest version of Firefox on my mac, I get the following error:

  "The operation cannot be performed because the"Firefox"element is in use."

  I close Firefox and still get this error. I tried this guy 100 times and may not know how to solve this problem. Help!

  I have Mac OS X 10.6.8 v.

  Download the full Firefox installation program and save the file to the desktop
  https://www.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/all.html

  If he has problems with the update or with the permissions then best is to download the full version and trash the version currently installed to do a fresh install of the new version.

  Download a new copy of the Firefox application and save the file to disk on the desktop image

  • Firefox 33.0: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all.html
  • Basket of the current application of Firefox (open the Applications folder in Finder and drag the Firefox application to the trash) to do a cleanup (re) install
  • Install the new version you downloaded
  • https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/installing+Firefox+on+Mac

  Your personal data are stored in the Firefox profile folder, so you will not lose your bookmarks and other data to personal when you uninstall and (re) install Firefox.

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox

• Slow performance HP Pavilion laptop problems

  Very recently, I bought a laptop HP Pavilion. It has Windows 8 and arrived in the mail, no more than a week ago. The first thing I did after that the mandatory installation process was to restore the files from my old laptop (which broke) via ClickFree (currently I have 625 677 GB free) and once that was completed, I installed several programs (office, Vipre, Photoshop, etc.). Apart from that, I did very little about the real hard disk of the computer, since I save everything externally on my ClickFree.

  My problems started occurring rather suddenly, Wednesday morning. In Firefox, I opened a tab for go on Facebook, and scroll the RSS seemed pretty gloomy. I closed the tab, but the slow pace continued in the other tabs, I had opened and then spread to the programs not involving is not the Internet. These problems have worsened gradually.

  On the Internet, the performance is particularly slow. I gave up video players like Netflix, because they freeze the browser to the point of crashing. Page loading is very delayed, even typing this message experiences freeze, despite the fact that I have nothing else running in the browser. There is warning of frequent messages in scripts and plugins does not (although, ironically, these messages are often unresponsive until I finish the script or the offending plugin). It is difficult to do anything on the Internet, such as the loading of pages and tabs of switching may take several minutes. Just clicking can cause the browser to freeze for minutes at a time.

  Off the Internet, programs load extremely slowly, often freezing. Opening files sometimes, with an increase in frequency, translates into a green loading bar at the top of the screen. Sometimes this bar gets stuck and cannot finish, and I can't access the contents of the file; This happened when I tried to open the Panel, to get more specific information about the computer to include in this message. Sometimes programs, such as video players, open without actually playing the video file, or they open at all. Often these programs freeze and sometimes hang; the desktop and the Explorer bar at the bottom of the screen (with the start menu, etc.) are not likely to freeze or disappear, for varying degrees of time. When I came to the computer, CPU utilization averaged about 4-6%, but now he's averaging 40 to 60%.

  Start the computer became too long and hard. The last time that I restarted, I entered my password only to get a completely black screen for at least half an hour; My office and the icons have appeared when I pressed Ctrl-alt-delete. After that, I stopped to turn off the computer (it was not a long time ago). This morning, I opened the laptop to connect, but received only a "Please wait" while the computer has tried to load the login page. It took 10-15 minutes, and then I was finally able to enter my password.

  These issues are getting worse, and I'm sure I'm forgetting several, but I think that what I've included enough to illustrate my problem. This is a new laptop, but it works almost as bad as my old laptop, which became unusable recently and had to be replaced with this one. I can't imagine what is the cause, but I really wish she was fixed. I installed a program called Fix - It Utilities (the installation disk supplied with the notebook) to try to improve the performance of the laptop, but to no avail. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Hello ValentineKills. I understand that the computer is slow. I will do my best to help you!

  This can be caused by a hardware failure or a software/driver/virus conflict. However, we won't know until the diagnosis is made.

  I'll provide a few official documents that provide information on how to speed up the computer. I want that you follow all the steps in all documents. In this way, if the problem exists, it will restrict the root cause. Here are the documents that I want you to try:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2746761

  http://support.HP.com/us-en/document/c03460887

  Since you're under Windows 8, I have a further suggestion: complete all updates to Windows, and then upgrade the computer to Windows 8.1. While the operating system is upgraded, try to use the computer and see if the speed is any different.

  Please reply when you have finished troubleshooting. I'm only here to help!

  Mario

• Performance of the hard drive, runs at 30% all the time; slow response

  Pavilion Slimline works 30% all the time, slow at times, all the time. Run the Task Manager, identified all of the questions.

  Defragmentation, historical, navigation can be run. Registry cleaner also run.

  Still slow responses,

  Suspect still running games, must stop them, as well as other unnecessary programs.

  Any suggestions, useful, believe, this will solve the problem and improve poor performance.

  Thank you for the comprehensive answer. If the speed is the main problem now, theoretically, upgrading the hard drive would be able to increase the speed up to a point. Of course, this would impact speed of normal programs, programs on the web, etc. I also carefully read the document provided Red Rose, and although it is informative, I don't know about most in this paper has been tried.

  Regarding the age of the laptop, age obviously decreases the computer's full performance, and you have little control over this, unless you buy another computer.

  I have an idea of how research and troubleshooting have achieved you, but it is only an idea. I'll link some documents with information that you may or may not be useful:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-CA/Windows-8/improve-performance-optimizing-hard-drive

  http://itzkumar.WordPress.com/2010/07/03/10-ways-to-increase-hard-disk-life-and-performance/

  Let me know if you have any other questions, and I'll do my best to help you.

  Mario

• Performance of the fans on Satellite L30-134

  Hello

  I have a question about the performance of the cpu on my L30-134 fans (celeron M 410 @1. 46 ghz). Some users posted similar questions on different laptops series L, but I'd love to hear some comments L30 - 134 user/advice.

  The problem is that by default, the fan does not work on the down low all the time, but it is off and goes on every 2-3 minutes hit RPM high and causing a lot of noise. Sometimes however it works down low most of the time, being really quiet and keep the temperature at 48 to 55 degrees, while during for turning on and off the temperature is 58-65.

  There are two options for cooling in Toshiba Power Saver (which came preinstalled) we're max performance, the other is to optimize the battery. The fan seems to work on the Tower on / disable system regardless of the option selected.
  
  Q1 Do these two options are actually on the fan is constantly working on low speed or activation and deactivation?
  Q2 How can I do the fan runs all the time at low revs?
  Q3 is there third-party security programs to control the fan speed?
  
  PS: I don't have all of the options on the fan speed in the BIOS

  I'd appreciate your comments. It is not fun to have a noisy fan :)

  Hello

  As you have already mentioned the Toshiba Power saver is preinstalled on your device.
  My phone supports also this utility and energy saver controls the speed of the CPU and cooling mode.
  M unit fan starts to turn if the temperature rises to a higher level, but it depends on the use of the laptop. I don t play much games performance, but I use my camera for graphic design. Sometimes, the fans run really fast and long, but sometimes the laptop is quite.
  My support of intelligence tools speed level 4 CPU processing power and cooling method is the value max performance.
  I think the cooling also depends on the environment

  Moreover, I also read a lot of reviews on the cooling fan rotation and. Sometimes, the update of the BIOS changed the performance of fans

  A small comment to Q3: Don t think that any 3rd party application will control the performance of the fans properly. If the energy saver is not installed on the device, the power of Microsoft options are responsible for execution.

• Re: Satellite L500-19Z - how to increase the performance of the game?

  Hey

  Basically, I have a Toshiba Satellite L500-19z, with chipsets Intel Series 4 express. I know this isn't a particularly good game, but surely the performance of game should be reasonable?

  I get 80% of the time lag - while on my old laptop (which costs no more than £200) I could play World of Warcraft on it no problem (I played the Sims3 on this laptop and had very few problems. I'm playing Dragon Age, but it is almost impossible.) My laptop is not more than 8 months old.

  I just want to know if there is a way to increase the performance of the game? I thought that maybe to connect my laptop to a PC Tower, but that could lead to the worst game performance, so I said.
  I'm sure I can't replace the graphics card, I've updated my drivers, defragment disks and so on.

  Any help is really appreciated, thanks in advance.

  Hello

  Is there anything to do to increase game performance. It depends on the graphics card and Intel cards are not designed for games, they are a good choice for mobile use because they don t need a lot of power.
  In addition, the peut t graphics card be exchanged, s thereby.

  It s always depending on the game that you can play. Therefore, check the system requirements of all the games you want to play and if your graphics card is supported. Not all games support all graphics cards.

  You must also use low graphics settings in each game. You can use the parameters of t.

  For example on my Satellite U400, possessing the same Intel graphics card, I can play Half Life 2 which has already 5 years but always low medium graphics settings.

• Performance of the game on Satellite Pro P100-439

  Hallo,

  After paying a lot of money for this laptop, it's actually only worse typing Word-texts. There is almost no games that could be played on this laptop, nore wether Fifa 07, Fifa 08, wether Call of Duty 2 nore Red Orchestra (this list is in fact muuuuch longer), most of the time its simly to slow down. graphikcard 512 MB is not a lot if you cann't play anything. I have not now what to do... hope someone can help me, cause, I'm with my nerves on the end.
  Stan

  Published by: Admin on October 6, 2007 08:08

  One question;
  Are you using Vista on this laptop?
  Well, if you bought this phone especially for a game I recommend the installation of Windows XP with the latest graphics drivers and then to try to play all the games.
  As you probably known t the Vista operating system needs a lot more material resources like old operating systems from Ms. This could have a bad influence on the performance of the game.

  Also I recommend you to check this page.
  078 http://www.Computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9011 & pageNumber = 1
  On this page you will find an interesting discussion about the game on Vista OS

  _By the way; _
  Microsoft has released a published and patch which solves the problems with the use of virtual address space. This is a reason why some games is crushed or didn't run smoothly on Vista OS

  * + Use of space virtual address in Windows game development + *.
  http://support.Microsoft.com/?scid=kb%3ben-us%3B940105&x=11&y=9

  Best regards

• Performance of the Satego P100-491 and 490

  At the moment I really disappointed of the performance of the portable computer game, but it would be a point to check with a
  installation of XP for the boarder that is due to the new vista!
  The problem is that I have a breakdown of the frame after a few seconds of the game, it seems to be related to the noise
  out, but I couldn't find any new drivers that the video driver date is December 2006 and the driver audio Nov 2006!

  Even on the nvidia site, there was no possibility to download a driver for vista and the series Go7X!
  Any thoughts would be nice!

  Even the same performance may be approved by the utility of radar of Toshiba it self it seems to be a Direct3D application and if you start it when its starting to animate and you move the mouse in a circle, you can see a hit on performance which is related to the video card/driver/hardware!

  It's a real mess, I opened a gives support to Toshiba speech on samedimidi does not have any answher. IM really surpriced I thought always to...

  Satego P100 unknown to me, but I presume that this laptop is similar to the Satellite P100. I can just recommend you to check all the processes and substantive services and put an end to all things, that you don't need.

  I put t know which antivir application is preinstalled but it's probably Norton as on other laptops Toshiba. Try to stop it or even delete the system and see if the laptop works better.

  By the way: is this model of laptop available in Germany?