Photoshop has given up waiting for the assessment

Similar Questions

• I get the message: Photoshop has encountered a problem with the display driver and has temporarily disabled GPU enhancements. Visit the Web site of the manufacturer of the video card for the latest version of the software.

  Photoshop has been giving me the warning:

  Photoshop has encountered a problem with the display driver and has temporarily disabled GPU enhancements. Visit the Web site of the manufacturer of the video card for the latest version of the software.

  Also other programs are affected.  I suspect a recent download of Adobe.  Can anyone HELP.

  No, it has nothing to do with updates of Adobe. There is a problem with your video card driver.

  Go directly to the Web site of the manufacturer of the GPU for updates (not Microsoft, not a System Builder).

• Please wait for the customer to political group - stop questions

  Hello

  I have problems with the closing of a machine. When the machine is connected to the corporate network, everything works fine. However, if the computer is connected to the VPN (1 hour or more) it is always suspended when it stops. First step in the shutdown process is:

  Please wait for the system event Notification service.

  This change after 3 minutes exactly. Next step:

  Please wait for Group Policy client windows 7

  is never exceeded (even after a few hours). Machine never off.

  Under newspapers there are always these 4 events when the machine stops in vain:

  1. 6005: the winlogon notification subscriber takes a long time to handle the notification event (Logoff).
  2. 4627: the event COM + a system expired attempt to fire the method of logging on the event {D5978650-5B9F-11D1-8DD2-00AA004ABD5E} class for the Publisher and the Subscriber.  The Subscriber has not responded within 180 seconds. The full name of the subscription is "ISensLogon2". The HRESULT is 80010002
  3. 6006: the winlogon notification subscriber took 180 second (s) to handle the notification event (Logoff).
  4. 6005: the winlogon notification subscriber takes a long time to handle the notification event (Logoff).

  Sense has expired after 3 minutes while there is no event 6006 for GPClient and machine is stuck there for centuries (Please wait for the customer to group policy). I noticed in the system logs that before the machine hangs during the shutdown process there are these errors and warnings:

  • 5783: the session configuration for the Windows NT or Windows 2000 Domain Controller \\server for the domain X is not admissible.  The current CPP of Netlogon call on \\machine to \\server was canceled.
  • 1014: name resolution for the name of the server has expired after none of the configured DNS servers answered.
  • 131: NtpClient could not set a domain peer to use as a source of time due to the DNS resolution error on ". NtpClient will try again in 3473457 minutes and double the reattempt interval thereafter. The error was: the requested name is valid, but no data of the requested type was found. (0x80072AFC).

  There is more than 1014 events for different servers and some 131. 5783 is always alone.

  I did a group policy log, because I thought that I will be able to see where the machine stuck. Below you can see the part of the newspaper GPSVC when the machine stops in vain:

  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: incoming with the event 0xe58
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: cancellation pending appeals
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x71a
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: cancelled waiting for calls
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: dating dwStatus = 0 x 0
  GPSVC (438.1a04) 21:31:24:327 waiting for user group wire political end.
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: incoming with the event 0xe10
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: cancellation pending appeals
  GPSVC (218.C88) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0 x 525
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0x71a
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: cancelled waiting for calls
  GPSVC (2d4.9C8) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: incoming with the event 0xdcc
  GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: incoming with the event 0x20cc
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
  GPSVC (2d4.9C8) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: incoming with the event 0xd90
  GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:327 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
  GPSVC (2d4.1cfc) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: dating dwStatus = 0 x 0
  GPSVC (218.D48) 21:31:24:342 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0 x 525
  GPSVC (218.D48) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
  GPSVC (218.1c04) 21:31:24:327 Client_CompleteNotificationCall: failed with 0 x 525
  GPSVC (218.1c04) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::OnNotificationTriggered: Completenotification failed with 1317
  GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
  GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: dating dwStatus = 0 x 0
  GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: entering with the event 0 x 2100
  GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
  GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: dating dwStatus = 0 x 0
  GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: entering with the event 0 x 1264
  GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::AbortAsyncRegistration: No asynchronous recording is in progress
  GPSVC (218.1054) 21:31:24:342 CGPNotify::UnregisterNotification: dating dwStatus = 0 x 0

  I excluded 1 GP machine and left on the VPN for a few hours, several times. He always stopped correctly.

  However I tried with the VPN disconnection before turning off the machine, I even turned off WiFi but machine still hanging. If I tried to get GP results it takes ages before stopping the machine and he's stuck in the step "to get the user name. Gpupdate/force will never update policy (it stops at policy update...). I tired with the installation of different patches that has not solved the problem.

  I think that there is that DNS issues while the machine is on VPN which led the GP cannot be applied. When the machine tries to close it is always somehow connected. There is no problem with the connection, no GP application script when the user disconnects, not roaming profiles.

  Does anyone have the same problems? All machines are Dell with Juniper NC (VPN).

  Thank you

  Hello

  The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums. I would recommend posting your query in the TechNet Forums.

  TechNet forum: For Windows 7 

  Hope this information helps.

• CREATE INDEXES online is waiting for the TX = 4 mode

  Hello

  I have a strange blocking problem where an INDEX CREATE LINE is waiting for a transaction that did only inserted a line in the parent table.

  Wait is mode TX = 4 (not TM locks) and I currently have it reproduced only on 11.2.0.3 and 11.2.0.4

  Easy to replicate the schema SCOTT:

  Session 1:

  SQL > set time on

  14:54:58 SQL > insert into SCOTT. Dept (DEPTNO, dname) values (50, 'test');

  1 line of creation.

  Session 2;

  14:55:24 SQL > create index test on SCOTT. EMP (ename) online;

  It's waiting ' enq: TX - line lock conflict ":"

  SQL > select sid, chain_signature from v$ wait_chains where blocker_is_valid = 'TRUE '.

  SID CHAIN_SIGNATURE

  ---------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------

  603 ' SQL * Net client message' < ='enq: TX - line lock conflict '

  While waiting to acquire the lock of transaction in mode 4:

  SQL > select * lock gv$ where sid = 603

  INST_ID SELECT ADDR KADDR SID TYPE ID1 ID2 LMODE CTIME BLOCK REQUEST

  ---------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

  1 00000006CDA05EB8 00000006CDA05F10 603 352577 0 4 0 348 2 AE

  1 00000006CDA06078 00000006CDA060D0 603 DL 779505 0 3 0 308 2

  1 00000006CD9FABE0 00000006CD9FAC38 603 DL 779505 0 3 0 308 2

  1 00007F28001F5028 00007F28001F5088 603 779505 0 2 0 308 2 TM

  1 00007F28001F5028 00007F28001F5088 603 779510 0 4 0 308 2 TM

  1 00000006CD9FA240 00000006CD9FA298 603 779505 0 4 0 308 2 OD

  1 00000006B4F26790 00000006B4F26808 589847 711499 6 0 308 2 TX 603

  1 00000006CDA0ED68 00000006CDA0EDC0 655377 996169 0 4 308 TX 603 0

  I've traced 10046 and 10704:

  broadcast message = obj 29231196672 #= 779514 tim = 1447251053634045

  ksqgtl * mode TX-000f001e-000ad97c = 4 flags = 0 x 10001 timeout = 21474836 *.

  ksqgtl: xcb = 0x6bb322528, ktcdix = 2147483647, topxcb = 0x6bb322528

  ktcipt (topxcb) = 0 x 0

  ksucti: init logon has of txn DID:

  ksqgtl:

  ksqlkdid: 0001-003F-0000AFC4

  ksudidTrace: ksqgtl

  ktcmydid(): 0001-003F-0000AFC4

  ksusesdi: 0001-003F-0000AFC3

  ksusetxn: 0001-003F-0000AFC4

  ksqcmi: TX, f001e, ad97c mode = 4 timeout = 21474836

  2015-11-11 15:11:36.566

  WAITING #140700792578680: nam ='enq: TX - line lock conflict ' ela 42932082 name = | mode = 1415053316 usn < < 16 | location = sequence 983070 = obj 711036 #= 779514 tim = 1447251096566283

  And there is nothing in V$ SESSION leader/block/line current. class obj # is EMP. current sql_id is the CREATE INDEX.

  If anyone has an idea on:

  -Why creating an index in line must wait for transactions that modified only parent table

  -How to continue the investigation

  -can or cannot reproduce in other versions

  Thanks in advance,

  Franck.

  I guess you have a constraint foreign key between emp and Dept.

  It's expected behaviours: since 11.1 any DML at one end of a referential integrity constraint translates into a mode lock 3 taken at the other end, and your phenomenon resembles a side effect of this.

  When you try to create the index online that your session must assume that the other session (holding mode 3 on the emp and dept) may have changed the emp and dept, so it must wait for the session to the commit or rollback.

  (I guess that in principle, he could walk the cancellation of the transaction see if EMP had in fact been changed - but maybe who was considered too complicated to be worth the risk to implement)

  Concerning

  Jonathan Lewis

  Updated - I just did a quick check to reproduce the effect on 11.1.0.7

  For reference - here are a few notes on modes of locking and how the application has changed over time: https://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/locks/

• HP laserjet 1022 does not wait for the user to turn the pages when printing double-sided

  My Hp laserjet 1022 printer working properly for years.

  So far, when he executed more paper he tried a couple of times to get more paper and then stops with a message on the PC it is out of paper.

  Very annoyingly, this has changed recently, now when it is out of paper, he tries a couple of times to get more paper and watch the message on the PC, saying that it is paper and then again, try a couple of times to get more paper and again shows the same message on the PC and him back... This continues to go on and on.

  It's especially annoying when trying to print double-sided. Before he used to stop and ask you to turn the pages to print the other side. Now the previous behavior overrides the break to turn the pages and keeps it will try to get more paper. As now, it does not wait for the user to turn the pages, in general it spoils the impression out by getting another paper that is not what I wanted, he drives me crazy! It's really hard to print anything double face now.

  All solutions?

  Operating system is Windows 7, I just downloaded and installed the latest driver for this printer "2013-01-09, Version: 20120918" and I get the same behavior. In the properties of the printer that I put some State Messages to Off and at least I don't get the full windows message screen poping up every time the printer is trying again to get more paper. I have not found all the other parameters that may affect this behavior.

  Help!

  Hello

  I solved the problem! I found the original CD for the printer. I uninstall the current driver and then install CD and now when the printer is out of paper trying to get paper a couple of times and then stops, as it used to be.

  Thanks for your help.

  Martin

• Photoshop has encountered a problem with the display driver

  I've updated photoshop on my mac last night as it kept prompting me to do, and I have an exam tomorrow, which requires the use of photoshop. When I open photoshop this morning the following message appears:

  "Photoshop has encountered a problem with the display driver and has temporarily disabled the improvements using graphics hardware. Visit the Web site of the manufacturer for the latest version of the software. For more information, visit: http://www.adobe.com/go/photoshop_gpu_cc_en'. '.

  Can someone help me with this? IT IS URGENT!

  The problem is the driver for your video card, no Photoshop.

  Update the video card driver from the website of the manufacturer of the GPU (NOT Microsoft or a system integrator).

• Storage VMotion - a general error occurred: could not wait for the data.  Error bad0007.

  People,

  I searched through this forum and have not found an answer that works in many positions out there, I say to myself that I would ask him once again.

  Here's the context:

  We have 12 identical Dell M600 blades in 2 chassis with 16 GB of Ram, 2 x Xeon E5430, they are all connected to an Equallogic PS 5000XV iSCSI SAN on a separate iSCSI (vswitch1) with 2 cards network dedicated network and dedicated switch, console svc iscsi dedicated, dedicated VMkernel port for iscsi access. Net access (vswitch0) contains port groups VM for our various networks and a console port and vmkernel svc for VMotion with 2 separate NETWORK cards as well.

  We are running ESX 3.5 U3 and VCenter 2.5 U3 on Win2k3 R2

  VMotion works between all servers, Storage Vmotion works for most machines, HA works and the value 2 host failurs with no monitoring of vm, DRS is set to manual for now I have a few machines on the local stores that I complete my rebuilt LUN, there is no set of rules for DRS and VMware EVC is enabled for guests of the Intel. However, I'll just describe one machine to do svmotion below.

  Here's the problem:

  I'm trying to Svmotion via svmotion.pl - interactive, a Machine to Windows 2000 with a virtual disk and a virtual RDM. I am aware of the requirements for the RDM and required parameters for svmotion, independent is not selected for the RDM, and I also have svmotioned several machines linux and win2k3 with the same configuration without problem. In the interactive session, I choose to individually place the disks and I chose the virtual disk to only the virtual machine to be moved, essentially, as I saw it move vdisk virtual machine and then copy to the pointer of the RDM.

  The use of the processor in this machine is about 25% average. but I try to run migrations at the time the lowest. and The Host it itself shows only about 5.5 GB of the 16 GB of RAM used. so I think we're good on the RAM. the volume/datastore that I'm migrating from has 485 GB free and the volume/datastore I migration towards a 145 GB free. the VM virtual disk is only about 33 GB.

  I run the script the windows version of the RCLI svmotion. and when to begin the process, I get the following error at around 2 percent of the progress:

  "Since the server has encountered an error: a general error occurred: could not wait for the data."  Error bad0007. Invalid parameter. »

  After searching around, I found the following hotfixes to the U2 release notes

  • Migrate.PageInTimeoutResetOnProgress: Set the value to 1.

  • Migrate.PageInProgress: The value 30, if you get an error even after the setting of the Migrate.PageInTimeoutResetOnProgress variable.

  I've made these changes, and I still get the same error.

  When I dig in the newspaper, I see these entries in the journal of vmkwarning:

  (Feb 24 00:17:32 vmkernel iq-virt-c2-b6: 82:04:13:56.794 cpu4:1394) WARNING: bunch: 1397: migHeap0 already at its maximumSize bunch. Cannot extend.

  (Feb 24 00:17:32 vmkernel iq-virt-c2-b6: 82:04:13:56.794 cpu4:1394) WARNING: bunch: 1522: Heap_Align (migHeap0, 1030120338/1030120338 bytes, 4 align) failed.  calling: 0x988f61

  (Feb 24 00:17:32 vmkernel iq-virt-c2-b6: 82:04:13:56.794 cpu4:1394) WARNING: migrate: 1243: 1235452646235015: failure: out of memory (0xbad0014) @0x98da8b

  (Feb 24 00:17:32 vmkernel iq-virt-c2-b6: 82:04:13:56.794 cpu2:1395) WARNING: MigrateNet: 309: 1235452646235015: 5 - 0xa023818: sent only 4096 bytes of data in message 0: Broken pipe

  (Feb 24 00:17:32 vmkernel iq-virt-c2-b6: 82:04:13:56.794 cpu6:1396) WARNING: migrate: 1243: 1235452646235015: failed: Migration protocol error (0xbad003e) @0x98da8b

  (Feb 24 00:17:32 vmkernel iq-virt-c2-b6: 82:04:13:56.794 cpu2:1395) WARNING: migrate: 6776: 1235452646235015: could not send data for 56486: Broken pipe

  At this point, I'm stuck... What is Windows RCLI? the vcenter Server? or the service console with not enough of RAM? We have already increased all our consoles service 512 MB...

  Any help would be greatly appreciated...

  Thanks in advance.

  Alvin

  The vmkernel on out of memory error, I had that before. And vmware support recommends setting 800M Max service console memory. And I did it and have no problems after that.

  See if that helps the issue.

  Mike

• HumanTaskActivity does not wait for the user to act

  Hello
  
  Proc2 I stole the activity of each of the branches, I invoke another process called PROC3 from the e-mail as PROC3 entry.
  
  PROC3 contains only HumanTaskActivity.
  
  By the time wherever I start my PROC2, he calls PROC3, but in HumanTaskActivity PROC3 does not wait for the response, it gets full without sending email.
  
  Any help would be very handful for me.
  
  Thank you
  VIKI

  VIKI,

  You can run just PROC3? It work? Except that there is a problem with the assignment of the user / group in this task? Users of human tasks has the correct permissions / roles?

  Marc

• Satellite P200D-128: Toshiba has a Web page for the graphics card drivers?

  Hi I want to update the driver for my card graphics ATI Mobility Radeon 2400HD with the updated driver, Toshiba has a Web page for the graphics card drivers?

  Concerning the best and warm
  Adrian Wainer

  Hello

  All Toshiba drivers for European notebook series can be found on the European driver Toshiba page:

  You can find it here:
  http://EU.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com-> support Download Center &-> Download drivers

  You will find all the latest drivers published by Toshiba

• Ive been waiting for 20 minutes waiting for the consultant to apple. Must be a lot of problems apple these days

  Ive been waiting for 20 minutes waiting for the consultant to apple. Must be a lot of problems apple these days

  A twenty minute wait is not at all unusual.

• Looking for a Boolean function similar to or, but do not wait for the second entry in case he gets a 'real' a single entry

  my program works in 2 processes in parallel inside a while loop and should stop when one of them ends.

  How can I do? Uses the function 'Or' wire loop the stop condition will not do the job, waiting for the two processes to give their comments before running.

  What I really need is a function that waits until she gets a 'true' through one of its entry and then executes without waiting than the other.

  Y at - it such an option?

  If not, does anyone have an idea how to achieve what I have described here?

  Thanks in advance!

  What you need is a "not synchronous or", i.e. "do something if Item 1 becomes real GOLD point 2 becomes true.  One way that comes to mind to do is with a design of producer/consumer model (event), where the consumer is a State Machine with a shutdown state.  Get 1 point to trigger an event (perhaps using a user event or property Value Change (follow the signs)) when it turns out true, and have it send to the consumer the Stop State.  Download point 2, to do the same thing.  Now one of them becoming true will cause the shutdown state be registered (without taking care of doing the other element), in other words, that becomes a real, (consumer) loop stops.

  Bob Schor

• Delay (30000 milliseconds) waiting for the SNMP service to communicate.

  When I start the SNMP service in Windows Server 2003 Enterprise 64-bit (SP2), the event ID 7009 (Timeout (30000 milliseconds) waiting for the SNMP service to communicate.), kindly help me to solve this problem.

  Hello

  Note that your computer is under domain, you must contact the TechNet forum, where we are the support technicians who are well equipped with knowledge on the issues of domain, do please visit the link provided below.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winserverfiles/threads

• remote desktop hang at 'Please wait for the system event notification' during logoff

  When I disconnect a remote connection, sometimes the GET logoff screen stuck at "Please wait for the system event notification" next time I try to open a session.
  This can also happen if that I disconnect the user, but the user seems to weigh on this same screen as well.

  There is a particular difficulty for this?  I can connect as long as administrator to another account, I can't kill connection attached somehow to be registered in the next time?

  Thank you

  Hello

  I suggest you to take a look at the answer in this thread and check if it helps.

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/windows_vista-security/Sens-could-not-connect-to-the-system-event/4e5a04e9-88f8-4017-9416-2ca67c5ce7c5

  Hope this helps,

• The message I get is Microsoft word has not been installed for the current user. Please run set up to install the application. I reinstalled the software, but get the same message.

  The message I get is Microsoft word has not been installed for the current user.   Please run set up to install the application.   I reinstalled the software, but get the same message.

  Hello
  
  See the methods listed in the articles below and check.
  You receive an error "Microsoft has not been installed for the current user" message when you try to start an Office 2003 program or an Office XP program for the first time
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/898512
   
  You receive a message "Microsoft has not been installed for the current user" when you start an Office XP program or start of Microsoft Office Maintenance mode
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/298022
  
  I hope this helps.

  Thank you, and in what concerns:
  Shekhar S - Microsoft technical support.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.
  If this post can help solve your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

• Does anyone has found a fix for the update of VISTA KB275842 error 80070490?

  Anyone found a fix for VISTA KB275842 error 80070490, or none of the solutions or help?

  80070490 ERROR_NOT_FOUND

  Corrupted system file

  You will need to perform an upgrade on the spot or reinstalling the operating system.

  Use the System File Checker tool to troubleshoot missing or corrupted on Windows Vista or Windows 7 system files

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929833>

  `~`

  If you receive the Windows Update 80070490 error, it means that a file (CBS Manifest) that is needed to install updates is corrupt.

  The System Update Readiness Tool for Windows can correct some conditions that cause Windows Update 80070490 error.

  To learn more about this tool, go to which is the analysis of system update tool? on the Windows website. http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/947821>

  If the system update readiness tool solves the problem, you will need repair Windows.

  Repair Windows will not damage your personal files or the programs that are installed on your computer.

  Once you have completed the repair, you will need to restart Windows Update to install updates are not included on the installation DVD.

  To repair Windows, follow these steps:

  1. Close all programs and restart your computer.

  2. Insert the Windows DVD into the drive of the computer. Wait for the installer to start. If the installation program does not start automatically, follow these steps:

     1. Click Start and type Drive: \setup.exe in the search box, where drive is the letter of the DVD drive of your computer (for example, D:\setup.exe).

     2. List programs, click Setup.exe.

  3. Click on install now.

  4. Click go online to get the latest updates for installation (recommended).

  5. If you are prompted to do this, type the Windows product key.

  6. What type of installation you want? window, click upgrade.

  7. Once the installation is complete, restart your computer, and then run Windows Update.

  `~`

  I hope that's enough to put you on the right path for nºw.

  Let us know how it works ºut.

  Good luck

  The current time and the date now in France is

  22:04

  Tuesday, March 26, 2013
  Central European time (CET) + 0100 UTC

  UTC/GMT is 21:04 Tuesday, March 26, 2013

  Current weather conditions in Paris

  Cloudy4 ° C / 39 ° F