PIX of routing

Similar Questions

• PIX of routing and two router

  My scenario is My PIX to 5 five interface. Interface E0 connect "Main router" Interface E1 connect "Partner router" Interface E3 connect 'Server Zone' Interface E4 connect 'Client area '.

  My problem is 'Partner of router' care network 172.16.1.0/24 and they have used 10.0.1.0/24 service behind "Main router" and I configure default route of 'Router Partner' for PIX as same as "main router.

  I have config road for PIX

  "" main route 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0 main router ""

  "partner of route 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 router partner."

  I can do? PIX can route?

  What you have listed above should be fine. The PIX you can route packets. However, the usual rules still apply to allow packets pass between 2 interfaces on the PIX. You should always create the xlates and access control so that the packets to pass. I hope this helps.

  Scott

• PIX-to-router VPN static-to-dynamic

  Dear friends,

  I'm trying to configure an IPSec tunnel between a router IOS and a PIX v7.0. I've seen some URL pointing here for a configuration example. However, this example only covers the v6.x PIX version, is not not helpful to resolve my case.

  My situation is that the router connects to a DSL provider and obtain a dynamic IP address and my PIX device has a static (Leased line) connection to the Internet. So, I have to establish the tunnel using preshared keys.

  How to make using v7.x on the PIX?

  Appreciate the help,

  Mauricio

  Mauricio,

  Here is an example for version 7.0 of PIX a tunnel L2L dynamic.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00804675ac.shtml

  You must create a dynamic encryption card, and use the tunnel defaultL2L-group for pre-shared key settings.

  The rate of this post, if that helps.

  See you soon

  Gilbert

• Termination of VPN on Pix behind router IOS with private subnet

  OK, basically, I wonder if it is possible to terminate a VPN connection on a Pix 506 Firewall which is behind a router IOS. The public interface of the Pix 506 have a private on a 29 ip address will IOS within the interface. Network is configured as follows:

  Internet as 10Base T

  | (5 public - X.X.X.34. 38)

  | (In WIC-1ENET)

  | (.34 assigned to interface)

  Cisco 1760

  | (Pomp) | (WIC-4PORTSWITCH)

  | | (10.0.0.1 29 on 1760)

  Net private Pix 506

  (192.168.1.0) (10.0.0.2 29 on Pix)

  Now, two internal interfaces of the 1760 are configured to PAT on the IP of the interface of the 1760 and all internet traffic goes perfectly. None of the access lists are currently applied anywhere on the 1760 and a static translation on the 1760 is configured pour.35 to 10.0.0.2 ('public' ip pix). RDP and other services authorized in the pix access list work perfectly well from the outside world when you enter a.35, but if I try to terminate a VPN from a pix 501 for the pix 506 offsite using the Intellectuelle.35 property, it does not work.

  Is it possible to do this type of work setting.

  I realize I could put an external switch to 1760 and run the public subnet directly and individually in the 1760 and Pix 506, however, I really would prefer not no need to do so if it is possible to avoid it.

  Remove the crypto map to the interface on the PIX and reapply.

• ASA at PIX VPN - routing

  Hi all, I built a site 2 site between an ASA 5510 and a PIX IPsec tunnel.  The tunnel is up, and most of the time the traffic flow between source and destination LANs as planned. The problem is that we need the ASA to send syslog messages in the VPN tunnel to a syslog on PIX site server.  If I get a router on the ASA website, I ping the site of PIX syslog server.   The following statement is in the ASA:

  Route out of pix.net.addr sub.net.mask next.hop

  But in the journal of the ASA, I see messages "Routing failed" for the traffic of the SAA on the syslog server.

  April 8, 2010 08:32:01 ASA5510: % ASA-6-110003: routing could not locate the next hop for icmp NP identity Ifc:10.xx.x.xx/0 to inside:172.xx.x.xx/0

  Any thoughts?

  Thank you

  Robert

  Hello

  Public IP address of the ASA must be in interesting for this tunnel traffic (since it's the INVESTIGATION period where newspapers are going to be sent from).

  Also, the IP address of the syslog server must be in the interesting traffic.

  In other words, you should be able to PING from the ASA to syslog (through the tunnel) server.

  Federico.

• PIX: Dialin routing through a different VPN VPN

  Here's the scenario: I have 2 PIX firewall on various sites connected to the internet with public (PIX A and B PIX) IP addresses.

  There is a permanent VPN site to site between the two and there is a clear separation between subnets between the two sites (internal network behind PIX is 10.10.4.0/24 and the internal network behind PIX B 192.168.0.0/16).

  I created dialin VPDN access to PIX for laptops to dialin via VPN - it currently allows access to the subnet 10.10.4.0/24 without problem.

  Now - I need these users of portable computers, when connects via the VPN to PIX has to be able to access the other remote site and access the subnet 192.168.0.0/16 of routing through the VPN site to site of PIX B.

  Is this possible? I would be grateful to anyone who helps with that. Thank you...

  This is currently not possible on the PIX as the PIX will not route traffic back on the same interface, it is entered in the.

  This feature will be available in the upcoming v7.0 version, which is currently in beta, so look out for it and you're ready to go.

• PIX as router

  Hello guys need your advice!

  Is it possible to use the PIX 515E as a router? See the link below for the topology of the network.

  http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/2831/pixasarouterns1.jpg

  Referring to the topology of the network. The customer wants the two subnets (192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24) can access each other. In addition, both subnets access to the web.

  It would be much easier if it's version 7.x

  What you can do, is make 2 interfaces that connect to your internal subnets at the same level of security. Then add the following command to your config file

  permit same-security-traffic inter-interface

  This will allow traffic to flow freely between these 2 subnets without NAT statements or access lists.

  HTH

  Jon

• PIX vlan routing

  Hello

  Two VLANs on the PIX 506 to 6.3 interface code. Is it possible to use these logical interfaces in exactly in the same way as physical ones? i.e. access lists can be applied and packets enter the firewall on vlan x and be allowed/denied to the vlan, where x and y are of VLAN on the same physical interface? In other words, as long as they are allowed to do in politics, the packets can route in and out the same physical interface on different VLAN? ASA definitley support this since I've done this numeorus times. However, I remember someone saying that you can't do on a stick with the PIX rouitng. Surely you can? I insist on the 6.3 it is, I use.

  Sorry for this very basic question; EAC is not clear. I have no access to our laboratory until Monday to get out either!

  Cheers, Steve

  Hello

  Quick answer is Yes, you can, as long as it's between two interfaces (which may be either phyical or logic). PIX 6.3 does not support them 'on a stick' routing on phyical or logical interfaces (7.0 does however), but between two interfaces is perfectly feasible.

  HTH

  Andrew.

• Performs a PIX routes packets from one LAN to the same LAN?

  Hello

  My PIX is the default gateway for my local network.

  Can I set up a static route in my 5151E PIX routes the packets of my LAN to another gateway in the same local network?

  Thanks in advance

  IMHO, it would be better to say:

  The PIX performs routing, but it is is not a router. It can offers routing features, but one thing is that the PIX will never allow traffic leaving the same interface it came. This is due to the Adaptive Security algorithm in the PIX.

  What about the reverse? Make the default gateway router and assigning a static route all (gateway of last resort) of this router for the PIX. Could be a solution.

  Kind regards

  Leo

• Routing problem of inside inside via PIX

  Hello

  I use a Cisco PIX 506th Version 6.3 (4).

  My inner interface is 192.168.5.1/24. The interface connects to a Cisco Catalyst 4503, the interface in question lies in the VLAN 20.

  On the 4053, I recently created a new VLAN (30). This VLAN holds 192.168.6.0/24. On the 4503, I created an interface VLAN, which acts as a default gateway for the network 192.168.6.0/24, IP: 192.168.6.2. The IP address of the interface VLAN on 4503 belonging to VLAN 20 is 192.168.5.2.

  My hosts in VLAN 30 have 192.168.6.2 default gateway - the Cisco 4503.

  My hosts in VLAN 20 have default gateway 192.168.5.1 - the Cisco PIX.

  I am trying to establish connectivity between the 2 networks. When I try to install between 192.168.5.10 (a random host) and 192.168.6.10 (another random host), I see that the PIX complains of not having a route to 192.168.5.10 192.168.6.10.

  (Road No. 6-PIX-110001 to 192.168.6.10 of 192.168.5.10)

  I have however to add a lane on the PIX that presents itself as such:

  inside 192.168.6.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.2 1 ANOTHER static

  So I will try to explain the PIX she can find 192.168.6.0/24 through 192.168.5.2.

  With regard to the NAT'ing:

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  NAT (inside) 0 access list acl-sheep

  NAT (inside) 1 access list acl-inside 0 0

  I thought for a moment it could have something to do with NAT'ing, so I added this to the ACL acl-sheep:

  allowed to access list acl sheep line 4 192.168.5.0 ip 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0)

  allowed to access list acl sheep line 4 192.168.5.0 ip 255.255.255.0 192.168.6.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0)

  allowed to access list acl sheep line 4 192.168.6.0 ip 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0)

  allowed to access list acl sheep line 4 192.168.6.0 ip 255.255.255.0 192.168.6.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 0)

  Because I don't want PIX of NAT traffic.

  After that, he always complains about not having a route.

  Does anyone have an idea what I could always try to solve this problem?

  With sincere friendships.

  Kevin

  Unfortunately, PIX does not route or redirect traffic on the interface, he received the package. Unlike a router, the PIX cannot route packets back through the same interface where the packet was originally received.

  CEC reference URL:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_qanda_item09186a0080094874.shtml

  Another suggestion for you, is if there are only a handful of hosts on the NET 192.168.5.0/24 needed to arrive at the NET 192.168.6.0/24 you can add a static route on them for use as the next hop 4503 to access the 192.168.6.0/24.

  Let me know if this helped.

  Sundar-

• Firewall PIX to connect to router - link light not on

  I'm trying to connect the PIX501 firewall to our router (router PortMaster) to test the external connection but light not on port 0.

  I used the crossover cable (also try normal cable), also to reboot the router. After the reboot, the light becomes on for a very short time (10 or 20 seconds) and then turned off and never more.

  Anyone know what happened? Any suggestions are welcome.

  See you soon

  Are the PIX or router interfaces to close? If this isn't the case, which are then they fixed on duplex speed? If it has a value of 10, the other 100, they won't come to the top.

  If they do not resolve, try another device on each port (501 and router) to check the status.

• Reverse Route injection

  My PIX firewall's VPN headend device. It is located behind the router C1721. I customize remote access VPN split tunnel network. It's working OK if I try to connect to VPN client located between PIX and C1721. If I try to connect to external VPN client before C1721 then it work without access to internal resources. But it works OK if I use the option to split the tunnel network. I passed on the opportunity to reverse the Injection of the road. Help to locate an error, please. What's wrong?

  If you're talking about access to internal LAN behind PIX of customers, there is no way it will NOT work without a split tunnel, if it works with split tunnel.

  Could you please paste a n/w diagram and the relevant part of PIX and router config.

• Incoming direction on the Pix interfaces

  Access-group of statements always apply an ACL to an interface with the command "in the interface. The Pix docs say "this filter incoming packets to the given interface. I would like a clear definition of what's arrival. My understanding, according to the logic of the access lists that I have made a request, this incoming is-bound traffic in the interface of the Pix of the connected subnet. So for the following interfaces, traffic entering the following subnet provenance

  outdoor - traffic from the Internet

  inside - traffic from inside Lan

  DMZ - traffic coming from the DMZ

  I just wanted to check that, because it's contrasted with IOS router configs. My understanding is the following:

  Outside the s0 interface - incoming list applies to incoming traffic from the Internet

  Inside interface e0/0 - incoming list applies to incoming traffic traffic vs subnet towards inteface as in my example of Pix inside.

  If someone could verify this, point me to a link or correct my examples?

  Thank you

  RJ

  1. Yes, to filter incoming traffic in the interface

  2 traffic can originate from anywhere, that is to say of many jumps/subnets away or directly connected before it hits the interface, but it moves to the interface. Same logic on pix and router.

  3. Yes, to filter traffic leaving the interface

  4 Yes, traffic position away from the router to the connected subnet or a destination of many jumps far (PIX has no more outgoing ACL)

  Steve

• Using PIX 515E configuration require

  Dear all,

  Hi.Actually I need help for PIX 515E.Pls. check out the scenario, design & suggest?

  Pls. find the details following and configuration of VLAN attached router.

  # I want to put as

  «Spend my LAN on CISCO 2900 (range 172.16.29.X IP...» (25 PCs) - VLAN router - CISCO PIX - ISP public IP.

  # Now it's

  "My LAN on CISCO 2900 - VLAN (external) router - ISP.

  Details of router & PIX:

  #Router inside the IP - 172.16.29.1 (inside property intellectual as it is very critical that cannot be changed)

  Outdoor #Router ip - what ip should I use? (I tried with 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0)

  #PIX outside intellectual property - what ip should I use? (My ISP IP?-j' tried with 208.144.230.197 which is currently outside of my router)

  #PIX within the intellectual property - what ip should I use? (I tried with 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0)

  Connection ISP #My is directly from the ISP GW to an ethernet cat 5 on my router VLAN

  #I would allow www, FTP, web-based like Yahoomail... etc... & Messenger services

  VLAN router Config:

  Current configuration: 1028 bytes

  !

  version 12.3

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  no password encryption service

  !

  hostname VLANRouter

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  activate the gcsroot password

  !

  No aaa new-model

  IP subnet zero

  !

  !

  no record of conflict ip dhcp

  DHCP excluded-address IP 172.16.29.1 172.16.29.240

  DHCP excluded-address IP 172.16.29.250 172.16.29.254

  !

  IP dhcp pool dhcppool

  network 172.16.29.0 255.255.255.0

  DNS-server 208.144.230.1 208.144.230.2

  router by default - 172.16.29.1

  !

  !

  !

  !

  controller E1 0/0

  !

  controller E1 0/1

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  IP 208.144.230.197 255.255.255.224

  NAT outside IP

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  IP 172.16.29.1 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  IP nat inside source list 7 interface FastEthernet0/0 overload

  IP http server

  IP classless

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 208.144.230.200

  !

  !

  access-list 7 permit 172.16.29.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  Line con 0

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  opening of session

  !

  !

  !

  end

  All advice is appreciated.

  Kind regards

  Hiren s Mehta.

  ORG Informatics Ltd.

  Bamako, MALI

  AFRICA

  Hi hiren,.

  See the answers below:

  #Router inside the IP - 172.16.29.1 (inside property intellectual as it is very critical that cannot be changed)

  When you upgrade the PIX router inbetween and your switch, you must put the PIX inside IP like 172.16.29.1 and change the router within the subnet to someother pool. Do the PAT on the PIX, rather than the router.

  Outdoor #Router ip - what ip should I use? (I tried with 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0)

  Router outside the property intellectual property will be that given by the ISP... The ISP would have given a public IP address for the WAN link. This cannot be changed.

  #PIX outside intellectual property - what ip should I use? (My ISP IP?-j' tried with 208.144.230.197 which is currently outside of my router)

  PIX outside IP must be comprehensive. ISP would have given you a LAN subnet. Use it. In this case, inside the interface of the router has an IP address from that subnet even...

  #PIX within the intellectual property - what ip should I use? (I tried with 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0)

  PIX inside must be 172.16.29.1, which will be the default gateway for all PCs. If you change this subnet, then the PC should have an IP address on the same subnet that has decided.

  Connection ISP #My is directly from the ISP GW to an ethernet cat 5 on my router VLAN

  didn't get it... is that on the internet router or switch?

  #I would allow www, FTP, web-based like Yahoomail... etc... & Messenger services

  If all these must be permitted from inside to outside, you have not open anything... by default, all traffic to the inside outside is allowed (except if you put a list of access denied)...

• Internet access without split tunneling VPN PIX

  I have a PIX 515E with code 6.31. I installed a VPN to allow access to the internal network from the Internet using the Cisco VPN client. It does not work properly. We have some sellers who demand that we come from our Internet IP range to allow us access to their database on the Internet. This works very well for our internal users, but I will allow users VPN for this also.

  Is there a way to allow the user from the VPN client to use the Internet for business access to the internet instead of use the split tunneling to access the internet through their own connection? I would like users to vpn to be NAT would have réécrirait Internet and seeming come from our pool of Internet addresses. What I found references by using the split tunneling, but this won't work for me. Am I stuck getting a VPN concentrator to achieve?

  Thank you

  Josh

  [email protected] / * /.

  The PIX cannot route a package back on the same interface, he entered the, which includes a customer entering the interface external and routed VPN package back on the same interface.

  A router or a VPN concentrator would be able to do this, but not a PIX, sorry.