PIX VPN problem!

Hello

I have currently having problem with vpn, the pix pix506e works fine yesterday, but today morning that the problem appears, the pix did more than 2 connections vpn client, if the user connected, user B will cut this time... If the user B, user A logs off, I write erase config and rebuild again with the base, but still the problem occurs, what could be the problem, software or... material? Here I am attaching my beginning of basic config and vpn client connection.

Our network is down now... Help, please.

118 17:07:12.460 12/16/04 Sev = Info/6 IKE/0x6300003D

Sending DPD asks 218.xxx.xxx.161, seq # = 1257657895

119 17:07:12.460 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013

SEND to > ISAKMP OAK INFO * (HASH, NOTIFY: DPD_REQUEST) to 218.xxx.xxx.161

120 17:07:17.468 16/12/04 Sev = Info/6 IKE/0x6300003D

Sending DPD asks 218.xxx.xxx.161, seq # = 1257657896

121 17:07:17.468 16/12/04 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013

SEND to > ISAKMP OAK INFO * (HASH, NOTIFY: DPD_REQUEST) to 218.xxx.xxx.161

122 17:07:22.475 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013

SEND to > ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, DEL) to 218.xxx.xxx.161

123 17:07:22.475 12/16/04 Sev = Info/5 IKE / 0 x 63000018

Deleting IPsec security association: (OUTBOUND SPI = 695320B 5 SPI INCOMING = F0A2471)

124 17:07:22.475 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000048

IPsec security association negotiation made scrapped, MsgID = 7A8F1E11

125 17:07:22.475 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000017

Marking of IKE SA delete (I_Cookie = BAF3D743B1D25DD6 R_Cookie = ED5BAEF920BA3244) reason = DEL_REASON_PEER_NOT_RESPONDING

126 17:07:22.475 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013

SEND to > ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, DEL) to 218.xxx.xxx.161

127 17:07:22.475 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700013

Delete the internal key with SPI = 0x71240a0f

128 17:07:22.475 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC/0x6370000C

Key removed by SPI 0x71240a0f

129 17:07:22.475 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700013

Delete the internal key with SPI = 0xb5205369

130 17:07:22.475 16/12/04 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC/0x6370000C

Key removed by SPI 0xb5205369

131 17:07:22.986 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 IKE/0x6300004A

IKE negotiation to throw HIS (I_Cookie = BAF3D743B1D25DD6 R_Cookie = ED5BAEF920BA3244) reason = DEL_REASON_PEER_NOT_RESPONDING

132 17:07:22.986 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100013

ITS phase 1 deleted because of DEL_REASON_PEER_NOT_RESPONDING. 0 ITS phase 1 currently in the system

133 17:07:22.996 16/12/04 Sev = Info/5 CM / 0 x 63100025

Initializing CVPNDrv

134 17:07:23.106 12/16/04 Sev = Info/6 CM / 0 x 63100031

Head of network device tunnel 218.xxx.xxx.161 disconnected: duration: 0 days 0:16:44

135 17:07:23.286 16/12/04 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000001

Signal received IKE to complete the VPN connection

138 17:07:23.316 12/16/04 Sev = Info/6 CM / 0 x 63100037

The routing table was returned to the original state before virtual card

139 17:07:25.649 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100035

The virtual adapter has been disabled

140 17:07:25.699 16/12/04 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000085

Service Microsoft's IPSec Policy Agent started successfully

141 17:07:25.699 16/12/04 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014

Remove all keys

142 17:07:25.699 16/12/04 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014

Remove all keys

143 17:07:25.699 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014

Remove all keys

144 17:07:25.699 12/16/04 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC/0x6370000A

IPSec driver successfully stopped

Thank you

Tonny

In your PIX, enter the following command:

ISAKMP nat-traversal

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • ping for the pix vpn problem

    Hello

    I got a pix 501 (6.3 - 4) on a local network and try to use Cisco VPN Client (4.0.2-D) on a remote pc.

    I can open a vpn session.

    I can't ping from the remote pc to the LAN

    I can ping from any station on the LAN to the remote pc

    After that I did a ping of a station on the LAN to the remote pc, I ping the remote computer to the local network.

    I am so newb, trying for 2 days changing ACLs, no way.

    I must say that I am in dynamic ip wan on the local network and the remote pc.

    Any idea about this problem?

    Any help is welcome.

    Here is the configuration of my pix:

    6.3 (4) version PIX

    interface ethernet0 10baset

    interface ethernet1 100full

    ethernet0 nameif outside security0

    nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

    activate the password * encrypted

    passwd * encrypted

    pixfirewall hostname

    domain ciscopix.com

    clock timezone THATS 1

    clock to summer time CEDT recurring last Sun Mar 02:00 last Sun Oct 03:00

    fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512

    fixup protocol ftp 21

    correction... /...

    fixup protocol tftp 69

    names of

    name 192.168.42.0 Dmi

    inside_access_in ip access list allow a whole

    inside_outbound_nat0_acl ip access list allow any 192.168.229.0 255.255.255.0

    outside_cryptomap_dyn_20 ip access list Dmi 255.255.255.0 allow 192.168.229.32 255.255.255.224

    access-list outside_cryptomap_dyn_20 allow icmp a whole

    pager lines 24

    opening of session

    logging trap information

    Outside 1500 MTU

    Within 1500 MTU

    IP address outside the 209.x.x.x.255.255.224

    IP address inside 192.168.42.40 255.255.255.0

    alarm action IP verification of information

    alarm action attack IP audit

    IP local pool dmivpndhcp 192.168.229.1 - 192.168.229.254

    location of PDM 192.168.229.1 255.255.255.255 outside

    209.165.x.x.x.255.255 PDM location inside

    209.x.x.x.255.255.255 PDM location outdoors

    PDM logging 100 information

    history of PDM activate

    ARP timeout 14400

    Global 1 interface (outside)

    NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_outbound_nat0_acl

    NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

    Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 209.165.200.225 1

    Timeout xlate 0:05:00

    Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225

    H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00

    Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute

    GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server

    AAA-server GANYMEDE + 3 max-failed-attempts

    AAA-server GANYMEDE + deadtime 10

    RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server

    AAA-server RADIUS 3 max-failed-attempts

    AAA-RADIUS deadtime 10 Server

    AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

    Enable http server

    Dmi 255.255.255.0 inside http

    No snmp server location

    No snmp Server contact

    SNMP-Server Community public

    No trap to activate snmp Server

    TFTP server inside the 192.168.42.100.

    enable floodguard

    Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

    AUTH-prompt quick pass

    AUTH-guest accept good

    AUTH-prompt bad rejection

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac

    Crypto-map dynamic outside_dyn_map 20 the value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

    Dynamic crypto map dynmap 20 match address outside_cryptomap_dyn_20

    map outside_map 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic outside_dyn_map

    outside_map interface card crypto outside

    ISAKMP allows outside

    ISAKMP identity address

    part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 20

    ISAKMP policy 20 3des encryption

    ISAKMP policy 20 chopping sha

    20 2 ISAKMP policy group

    ISAKMP duration strategy of life 20 86400

    vpngroup address dmivpndhcp pool dmivpn

    vpngroup dns 192.168.42.20 Server dmivpn

    vpngroup dmivpn wins server - 192.168.42.20

    vpngroup dmivpn by default-field defi.local

    vpngroup idle 1800 dmivpn-time

    vpngroup password dmivpn *.

    Telnet timeout 5

    SSH timeout 5

    Console timeout 0

    VPDN username vpnuser password *.

    VPDN allow outside

    VPDN allow inside

    dhcpd address 192.168.42.41 - 192.168.42.72 inside

    dhcpd lease 3600

    dhcpd ping_timeout 750

    Terminal width 80

    Cryptochecksum: *.

    Noelle,

    Add the command: (in config mode): isakmp nat-traversal

    Let me know if it helps.

    Jay

  • Site to Site PIX VPN problems

    Hi, I currently have a site to site vpn upward and running and it works fine. I try to put the other two online and just cannot make them work. I used the same configuration of one operation but I cannot get the next tunnel. I saw several errors when debugging isakmp and ipsec and they are at the end of my configs. Anyone have any ideas? Thank you

    Main site - a vpn clients connecting too it and pt to pt vpn to 3 endpoints

    Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3 (3)

    * Main Site Config *.

    client_vpn 10.10.0.0 ip access list allow 255.255.0.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

    VPN_to_Site2 10.10.0.0 ip access list allow 255.255.0.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (inside) 0-list of access client_vpn

    Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac fws_encry_set

    outside_map 60 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    address for correspondence card crypto outside_map 60 VPN_to_Site2

    crypto outside_map 60 peer 64.X.X.19 card game

    card crypto outside_map 60 transform-set fws_encry_set

    outside_map interface card crypto outside

    ISAKMP allows outside

    ISAKMP key * address 64.X.X.19 netmask 255.255.255.255 No.-xauth-no-config-mode

    ISAKMP identity address

    ISAKMP nat-traversal 20

    part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

    ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption

    ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

    10 2 ISAKMP policy group

    ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

    Site 2 config

    * only because the pt to pt does not work I have it set up to allow vpn clients to cross to connect to the main site.

    Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3 (5) *.

    permit access ip 192.168.0.0 list VPN_to_Main 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0

    NAT (inside) 0-list of access VPN_to_Main

    Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac fws_encry_set

    outside_map 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    outside_map card crypto 10 corresponds to the address VPN_to_Main

    crypto outside_map 10 peer 207.X.X.13 card game

    card crypto outside_map 10 transform-set fws_encry_set

    outside_map interface card crypto outside

    ISAKMP allows outside

    ISAKMP key * address 207.X.X.13 netmask 255.255.255.255 No.-xauth-no-config-mode

    ISAKMP identity address

    ISAKMP nat-traversal 20

    part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

    ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption

    ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

    10 2 ISAKMP policy group

    ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

    Errors

    PIX (config) # IPSEC (sa_initiate): ACL = deny; No its created

    authenticator is HMAC-MD5IPSEC (validate_proposal): invalid local address

    I have a link that works very well. I have copied the config from there, changed the ip info and it does not work. The only differences in the configs are no sysopt route dnat and it's on Version 6.2 (2)

    IPSec (sa_initiate): ACL = deny; No its created

    I think that you have configured a VPN tunnel without removing the cryptographic card of the external interface. The message above is the error we get in such situation.

    I suggest the following solution:

    -remove the external interface (the two pix) cryptographic card

    -Cree claire isa his and trendy clear ipsec his (the two pix)

    -Reapply the card encryption on external interfaces.

    If this doesn't solve the problem, restart the equipment.

    Kind regards

    Ajit

  • Simple PIX PIX VPN issues

    I'm trying to implement a simple PIX PIX VPN using the simple PIX - PIX VPN documentation for the sample config page. I have a lot of VPN tunnels with other very happy other PIX devices so it's quite annoying. Anyway, on the source PIX config is as follows:-

    access-list 101 permit ip 172.18.138.0 255.255.255.0 172.18.133.0 255.255.255.0

    access-list 101 permit ip 172.18.133.0 255.255.255.0 172.18.138.0 255.255.255.0

    NAT (phoenix_private) 0-access list 101

    Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

    No sysopt route dnat

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac chevelle

    ntlink 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map TransAm

    correspondence address 1 card crypto transam 101

    card crypto transam 1 set peer 172.18.126.233

    card crypto transam 1 transform-set chevelle

    interface inside crypto map transam

    ISAKMP allows inside

    ISAKMP key * address 172.18.126.233 netmask 255.255.255.255

    ISAKMP identity address

    part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 1

    of ISAKMP policy 1 encryption

    ISAKMP policy 1 md5 hash

    1 1 ISAKMP policy group

    ISAKMP policy 1 lifetime 1000

    and if I generate the traffic logs show this: -.

    9 August 18:40:15 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no translation not found for icmp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111 dst domestic group: 172.18.133.51 (type 8, code 0)

    9 August 18:40:17 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no translation not found for icmp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111 dst domestic group: 172.18.133.51 (type 8, code 0)

    9 August 18:40:18 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no group of translation not found for udp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111/3832 dst inside:172.18.133.51/53

    9 August 18:40:18 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no translation not found for icmp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111 dst domestic group: 172.18.133.51 (type 8, code 0)

    9 August 18:40:19 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no group of translation not found for udp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111/3832 dst inside:172.18.133.51/53

    No isakmp and ipsec debugging message appears, but you who wait that the PIX does not even link the traffic with the access list or a NAT.

    I do something obviously stupid, can someone tell me what it is, thank you.

    Jon.

    Hello

    1. you create a second access as list:

    outside_cryptomap ip 172.18.138.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 172.18.133.0 255.255.255.0

    and

    2. instead of

    correspondence address 1 card crypto transam 101

    You must configure

    card crypto transam 1 match address outside_cryptomap

    the problem is that you configure an ACL for nat and crypto - that does not work

    concerning

    Alex

  • With PAT on Cisco PIX VPN client

    Dear all,

    I have a PIX 515 to the main site with the IPSec security is enabled. Homepage user using 3.x VPN client connects to the PIX for VPN access. When user Home use real IP, I can ping to the local network of the main site. However, when the Home user using a router with PAT, the VPN can be established.

    Is there a setting I should put on PIX, VPN client or router?

    Thank you.

    Doug

    And if you still have problems, upgrade your pix, 6.3 and usage:

    ISAKMP nat-traversal

    But the first thing would be to check the IPSEC passthrough as Ade suggested. If the device is a linksys check the version of the firmware as well.

    Kind regards

  • Cisco VPN problems after installing the 506e

    My apologies if this makes no sense, because it is my 1st install of a PIX.

    I distance support external sites and had a Cisco VPN 4.6.00.49 connection through our Linksys router for access, company which worked a treat. We asked to have VPN access to our society, so I replaced the Linksys with a 506th PIX. I ran the Wizards(Yes I heard the gasps from 90% of you then) GUI access Internet out worked, came from e-mail in Exchange server and external users could vpn in our internal network. Great, I thought!

    BUT NOW

    I have a problem with coming out through the 506th pix VPN.

    My client connects to the external site. Authenticates the Logni & assigns a valid IP address. Unfortunately I couldn't make a ping, rdp or anything with the remote network.

    Thanks in advance

    Paul

    Paul

    Sorry, I wasn't clear on my post - that the order was necessary on the remote device. In any case I'm glad to hear his work.

  • On Pix VPN tunnel to the same subnet

    I have a customer who want to set up a the PIX VPN tunnel located on each site. For some reason, each side has the same subnet number, for example. 10.10.10.x/32. I'm sure we must run NAT, but is it possible.

    This can help

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800949f1.shtml

  • VPN clients cannot access remote sites - PIX, routing problem?

    I have a problem with routing to remote from our company websites when users connect via their VPN client remotely (i.e. for home workers)

    Our headquarters contains a PIX 515E firewall. A number of remote sites to connect (via ADSL) to head office using IPSEC tunnels, ending the PIX.

    Behind the PIX is a router 7206 with connections to the seat of LANs and connections to a number of ISDN connected remote sites. The default route on 7206 points to the PIX from traffic firewall which sits to ADSL connected remote sites through the PIX. Internal traffic for LAN and ISDN connected sites is done via the 7206.

    Very good and works very well.

    When a user connects remotely using their VPN client (connection is interrupted on the PIX) so that they get an IP address from the pool configured on the PIX and they can access resources located on local networks to the office with no problems.

    However, the problem arises when a remote user wants access to a server located in one of the remote sites ADSL connected - it is impossible to access all these sites.

    On the remote site routers, I configured the access lists to allow access from the pool of IP addresses used by the PIX. But it made no difference. I think that the problem may be the routes configured on the PIX itself, but I don't know what is necessary to solve this problem.

    Does anyone have suggestions on what needs to be done to allow access to remote sites for users connected remotely via VPN?

    (Note: I suggested a workaround, users can use a server on LAN headquarters as a "jump point" to connect to remote servers from there)

    with pix v6, no traffic is allowed to redirect to the same interface.

    for example, a remote user initiates an rdp session for one of the barns adsl. PIX decrypts the packet coming from the external interface and looks at the destination. because the destination is one of adsl sites, pix will have to return traffic to the external interface. Unfortunately, pix v6.x has a limitation that would force the pix to drop the packet.

    with the v7, this restriction has been removed with the "same-security-traffic control intra-interface permits".

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a008046f307.shtml

  • pix 501 vpn problem

    Can connect, I see not all network resources.

    The Vpn Client, worm: 5.0.01, is running on an xp machine.

    It connects to the network is behind a 6.3 (5) pix501-worm.

    When the connection is established the remote client gets an address assigned to the pool 192.168.2.10 vpn - 192.168.2.25:

    The vpn client log shows:

    Line: 45 18:07:27.898 12/08/09 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100034

    The virtual card has been activated:

    IP=192.168.2.10/255.255.255.0

    DNS = 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

    WINS = 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

    Area =

    Split = DNS names

    It is followed by these lines:

    46 18:07:27.968 12/08/09 Sev = WARNING/2 CVPND/0xE3400013

    AddRoute cannot add a route: code 87

    Destination 192.168.1.255

    Subnet mask 255.255.255.255

    Gateway 192.168.2.1

    Interface 192.168.2.10

    47 18:07:27.968 12/08/09 Sev = WARNING/2 CM/0xA3100024

    Failed to add the route. Network: c0a801ff, subnet mask: ffffffff, Interface: c0a8020a Gateway: c0a80201.

    48 18:07:28.178 12/08/09 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100038

    Were saved successfully road to file changes.

    49 18:07:28.198 12/08/09 Sev = Info/6 CM / 0 x 63100036

    The routing table has been updated for the virtual card

    50 18:07:29.760 12/08/09 Sev = Info/4 CM/0x6310001A

    A secure connection established

    * ...

    I can ping the remote client, on an inside ip behind the same pix

    When I get the 'route add failure' above, but I cannot ping the computer name.

    I activated traversal of NAT using the PDM, but when I connect with this option, I get the error that the "remote endpoint is NOT behind a NAT device this end is behind a NAT device" and ping fails.

    Behind the pix are a few computers with no central server, so I'm failed a WINS server for remote clients.

    I created the vpn with the wizard.

    The configuration file is attached.

    Any suggestion would be appreciated.

    Kind regards

    Hugh

    Hugh, sure you can classify based on the whole conversation, but you don't have to do but be certainly provide assessments.

    To sum up the shrinking global problems, the main objective was to ensure configuration VPN RA on the PIX501 has been corrected.

    1. we have enabled NAT - T on the firewall - even if it wasn't the question, but need it either it should you RA other places - travseral NAT VPN sensitizes the firewall on the other ends NAT devices - here is some good information on NAT - T for reference in the future

    http://www.Microsoft.com/technet/community/columns/cableguy/cg0802.mspx

    2. we fixed the VPN-POOL/28 network as well as the access list and acl to be coherent crypto sheep.

    Here is a link for future reference with many PIX configuration scenarios

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/prod_configuration_examples_list.html

    Finally, your only question remaining, we can say is purely isolated with the customer software vpn and MAC machine.

    You could maybe try a different version of the client in the MAC, or also look at the release notes for the open caveats to avoid cisco cleint managing versions and MAC versions if there are problems.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/prod_release_notes_list.html

    Concerning

  • Cisco Pix 515 VPN problems

    Hi all

    Here's my problem, I have 2 PIX 515 firewall...

    I'm trying to implement a VPN site-to site between 2 of our websites...

    Two of these firewalls currently run another site to site VPN so I know who works...

    I can't do the second site to the site to launch the VPN... when looking on the syslogs I get refused packages...

    Protected networks are:

    172.16.48.0/24 and 172.16.4.0/22

    If I try to ping from the Cisco (172.16.48.4) to 172.16.4.5, I get the following syslog:

    2 sep 02 2008 08:59:47 106001 172.16.48.4 172.16.4.5 incoming TCP connection doesn't deny from 172.16.48.4/1231 to 172.16.4.5/135 SYN flags on the interface inside

    It seems that the tunnel is trying to initiate, but something is blocking the internal traffic to penetrate through the VPN.

    Don't know what that might be, the other VPN are working properly.

    Any help would be great...

    I enclose a copy of one of the configs...

    Let me know if you need another...

    no road inside 172.16.4.0 255.255.252.0 172.16.48.1 1

    Remove this path should you get. Please rate if it does. Similarly, if you have a road similar to the other end, it should be deleted as well.

  • VPN to PIX access problem.

    I set up PPTP VPN on PIX 515 access with unrestricted license for Windows-based computers. I can connect but I'm unable to access all the resources on the network. I suspect this has something to access the list, but I don't know where to start. Here's the relevant part of the PIX config:

    access-list all-traffic ip to allow a whole

    access-list 100 permit icmp any any echo response

    access-list 100 permit icmp any one time exceed

    access-list 100 permit everything all unreachable icmp

    .

    IP address outside x.x.x.130 255.255.255.252

    IP address inside 192.168.254.1 255.255.255.0

    IP address x.x.x.97 255.255.255.224 DMZ1

    address IP DMZ2 192.168.251.1 255.255.255.0

    alarm action IP verification of information

    alarm action attack IP audit

    IP local pool vpnpool 192.168.254.201 - 192.168.254.254

    .

    Global (outside) 1 x.x.x.65 - x.x.x.93 netmask 255.255.255.224

    Global (outside) 1 x.x.x.94 netmask 255.255.255.224

    NAT (inside) 1 access-list all-traffic 0 0

    (DMZ1) 1 access-list all-traffic NAT 0 0

    Access-group 100 in external interface

    Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.129 1

    .

    Sysopt connection permit-pptp

    Telnet 192.168.254.0 255.255.255.0 inside

    Telnet timeout 5

    SSH timeout 5

    Console timeout 0

    VPDN Group 1 accept dialin pptp

    PAP VPDN Group 1 ppp authentication

    VPDN Group 1 chap for ppp authentication

    VPDN Group 1 ppp authentication mschap

    VPDN group ppp 1 encryption mppe auto

    VPDN Group 1 client configuration address local vpnpool

    VPDN Group 1 pptp echo 60

    VPDN Group 1 client authentication local

    VPDN username * password *.

    VPDN allow outside

    dhcpd address 192.168.254.100 - 192.168.254.200 inside

    dhcpd dns x.x.x.131 x.x.x.200

    dhcpd rental 86400

    dhcpd ping_timeout 750

    dhcpd allow inside

    Looks like you forgot to add a "nat 0" defines that there are no PAT beween your local inside network and the PPTP DHCP pool.

    PPTP pool must be different from the inside pool otherwise it is not routable correctly.

    no ip local pool vpnpool 192.168.254.201 - 192.168.254.254

    # Choose a new network PPTP pool that is not in use

    example of dansMon # is 192.168.1.0/24

    IP local pool vpnpool 192.168.1.1 - 192.168.1.254

    access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.254.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

    (Inside) NAT 0-list of access 101

    See this site for more information:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a0080143a5d.shtml

    http://www.Cisco.com/pcgi-bin/support/browse/psp_view.pl?p=hardware:PIX & s = Software_Configuration

    see PPTP

    sincerely

    Patrick

  • VPN connection between two pix firewall problems

    Hi, trying to create a VPN between the firewall two pix a 501 and a 506e.

    currently on the 506th pdm shows 1 IKE tunnel in the stats, but it displays then return to zero. The two hosts of pix can access the web and ping each other gateways.

    I posted the 506th config but the 501 config is the same.

    outside IP for pix 506th = a.a.a.a

    outside IP for pix 501 = b.b.b.b

    Internet service provider ip of the gateway to 506th = x.x.x.x

    Thank you

    Alex

    Hi Alex

    See the configuration on the other side (PIX501) it will be difficult to solve, you'll need to be sure when it is a phase failure 1 or phase 2.

    Please note between the two PIX IPSec negotiation fails if both of the phases SAs IKE do not match on the peers.

    Cordially MJ

  • VPN problem persists

    Hi, I implemented a project some time back which went something like this: a Headquarters site where a PIX515E is installed with a public static IP on its external interface. Three remote sites, each with connecting to the internet through 837 routers ADSL with a dynamic public IP address. I configured the firewall and routers for EzVPN (router is configured in client mode) and the VPN tunnel rises and it works fine. Of course, when there is no interesting traffic through the tunnel and the idle timer on the PIX expires, the tunnel down. It is also very good. The problem is once the tunnel breaks down, it is again automatically when interesting traffic passes through the router (which is assumed). I use the console and ran the debugging on one of the routers and noticed that once the tunnel descends and the router tries to bring it up again, it gives the message:

    "Key pair for this"XXX. " XX. XX. Mask XX/XX"already exists." Then, when I give the command "clear crypto isakmp his ', the tunnel rises immediately. I already posted this question before (link:http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1dd6e4b2). Maybe she has something to do with the Dead Peer Detection on the PIX and the router system. In any case, I have configured the following command on the router and PIX:

    ISAKMP crypto keepalive 2 10

    but still it does not solve the problem. The router's IOS version 12.3 (2) XC2 and the PIX OS version 6.3 a (3). Also im attaching the PIX and router config for this post. What else can be done to solve the problem?

    I replied to your last message.

    As I said, you must at least 12.3.7 so that it works correctly.

    "You must at least 12.3 (7) T for Dead Peer Detection work and send KeepAlive interval you want.

    ISAKMP crypto keepalive [interval] [dry til counted dead] periodical

    for example,.

    "isakmp crypto 15 5 keepalive periodicals.

    the key word is "periodic" is not available until 12.3.7 or later.

    ISAKMP crypto keepalive 2 10

    without periodic does nothing, you need periodic KeepAlive.

    ISAKMP crypto keepalive 2 10 periodicals

    will maintain the tunnel and head of network device know if/when it falls. It should be applied to the router and the PIX in your situation.

    I worked through this issue before with IOS EzVPN (12.3 (11) T) to PIX (6.3 (3)) and IOS EzVPN hub VPN3000 (4.1) of the basic VPN

    also... http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/SW/iosswrel/ps5207/products_feature_guide09186a00801ee19a.html

  • IP Sec VPN problem

    All, Hy

    I have a problem with IPSec VPN established between a PIX 515e and a Nortel contivity 1010. I do the configuration of the tunnel on both sides and it works correctly, but I can't do the communication between the two LANs.

    In the PIX log, I show this:

    2010-03-18 08:57:52 Local7.info 172.17.1.250 : 18 Mar 08:57:52 WEST: % PIX-6-602302: SA deletion, (his) sa_dest = 62.48.238.3, sa_prot = 50, sa_spi = 0x3fcc692a (1070360874) sa_trans = sa_conn_id of hmac-sha-esp, esp-3des = 4

    2010-03-18 08:57:52 Local7.info 172.17.1.250 : 18 Mar 08:57:52 WEST: % PIX-6-602302: SA deletion, (his) sa_dest = 213.223.214.52, sa_prot = 50, sa_spi = 0x1f7f65 (2064229), esp-3des esp-sha-hmac = sa_trans, sa_conn_id = 3

    This line is delivered every 2 minutes... Is it possible that it may be causing my problem? and what is that message?

    I show you my pix configuration:

    For me, this configuration is fine, but it's not work very well!

    Can you help me please?

    Kind regards

    In fact, it corresponds to the following:

    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (AENOR_ALL/255.255.0.0/0/0)

    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.9.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)

    current_peer: 213.223.214.52:500

    LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},

    #pkts program: 0, #pkts encrypt: 0, #pkts 0 digest

    #pkts decaps: 60, #pkts decrypt: 60, #pkts check 60

    compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0

    #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0

    Errors #send 0, #recv 0 errors

    So the packets are received and décapsulés, however, no response to be encapsulated.

    Please set 'error fixup protocol icmp' for the icmp inspection.

    Please check on the 172.17.1.7 the host itself to see if the default gateway is configured to be 172.17.1.250, and the host has no other specific channels configured. If it is a windows host, you can check "route print" at the DOS prompt.

    Please also check if it allows the incoming RDP session? Are you able to RDP from in-house?

    Are you able to Telnet on port 3389, from the DOS command prompt (telnet 172.17.1.7 3389)? What have you found?

  • ASA at PIX VPN - routing

    Hi all, I built a site 2 site between an ASA 5510 and a PIX IPsec tunnel.  The tunnel is up, and most of the time the traffic flow between source and destination LANs as planned. The problem is that we need the ASA to send syslog messages in the VPN tunnel to a syslog on PIX site server.  If I get a router on the ASA website, I ping the site of PIX syslog server.   The following statement is in the ASA:

    Route out of pix.net.addr sub.net.mask next.hop

    But in the journal of the ASA, I see messages "Routing failed" for the traffic of the SAA on the syslog server.

    April 8, 2010 08:32:01 ASA5510: % ASA-6-110003: routing could not locate the next hop for icmp NP identity Ifc:10.xx.x.xx/0 to inside:172.xx.x.xx/0

    Any thoughts?

    Thank you

    Robert

    Hello

    Public IP address of the ASA must be in interesting for this tunnel traffic (since it's the INVESTIGATION period where newspapers are going to be sent from).

    Also, the IP address of the syslog server must be in the interesting traffic.

    In other words, you should be able to PING from the ASA to syslog (through the tunnel) server.

    Federico.

Maybe you are looking for