Plugin Container causing the system to delay

I've updated Firefox version 13.0 x and when I made my browsing is down the tubes. When I was getting errors on which script that I waited just nearly two minutes before I could go forward, or in some cases, type the next character.

I restarted Firefox disable all add-ins and it seems to work normally. (with all the things that the plugin to do)

I started all of my additional macros plugins and extensions that allow both, and I came with the plugin following which causes an error on my system.
Shockwave Flash

Once I activate this plugin my browsing experience goes down the tubes. I don't know why this particular point suddenly of the problems after the upgrade, but it seems to be. Firefox itself seems to be blocked waiting on a reminder of the flash player. After about a minute passes, then the flash player will continue and the page works as the author designed it to. Once I have disabled the plugin again, then the performance of Firefox are restored.

Since this is my work computer, I think I can live without this plugin without problem. However, I would like to know what has changed with Firefox that caused it suddenly stop working.

Tags: Firefox

Similar Questions

  • Restart causes the 'system thread unhandled exception '.

    Freezes in Windows 8.  Restart causes the 'system thread unhandled exception '. Windows restores successfully to earlier restore point start, but the questions is recurring.

    3 crashes so far because the computer was purchased at the end of February, 2014.

    All 3 minidumps are available at:

    https://onedrive.live.com/redir?RESID=7B6D641161EAE33%211120

    This disturbs my work whenever I need to reactivate my license of office until I can get back to where I was.

    How can I avoid this problem happen again and still be able to fully use my computer?

    SYSTEM_THREAD_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED_M (1000007e)
    It is a very common bugcheck.  Usually the PIN address of exception
    the driver/function that caused the problem.  Always note this address
    and the date of the picture link / driver that contains this address.
    Some common problems are the exception code 0 x 80000003.  This means a hard
    coded breakpoint or assertion was hit, but this system has been started
    / /NODEBUG.  It is not supposed to happen as developers should never have
    breakpoints coded hard in retail code, but...
    In this case, make sure a debugger must be connected and the
    system startup/DEBUG.  This will we will see why this breakpoint is
    happening.
    Arguments:
    Arg1: ffffffffc0000005, unhandled exception code
    Arg2: 0000000000000000, the address that the exception occurred at
    Arg3: fffff880031a2938, address of Exception report
    Arg4: fffff880031a2170, address of the context record

    USTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1

    DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: VISTA_DRIVER_FAULT

    Nom_processus: System

    CURRENT_IRQL: 0

    Error_code: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - the instruction at 0 x % lx 08 referenced memory at 0 x % 08 lx. The

    memory could not be %s.

    EXCEPTION_PARAMETER1: 0000000000000008

    EXCEPTION_PARAMETER2: 0000000000000000

    WRITE_ADDRESS: GetPointerFromAddress: unable to read from fffff800d4fd3168
    Unable to get nt! MmPoolCodeStart
    Unable to get nt! MmPoolCodeEnd
    0000000000000000

    FOLLOWUP_IP:
    nvkflt + 37 c 2
    fffff880'03e187c2?              ???

    FAILED_INSTRUCTION_ADDRESS:
    + 37 c 2
    00000000'00000000?              ???

    STACK_TEXT:
    fffff880 '031a2b78 fffff880' 03e187c2: fffffa80'0d67d950 fffff880 '031a2e00 fffffa80' 0d67d950

    00000000'00230047: 0 x 0
    fffff880 '031a2b80 fffffa80' 0d67d950: fffff880 '031a2e00 fffffa80' 0d67d950 00000000'00230047

    00000000' 00000000: nvkflt + 0x37c2
    fffff880 '031a2b88 fffff880' 031a2e00: fffffa80'0d67d950 00000000'00230047 00000000'00000000

    00000000 00000001': 0xfffffa80'0d67d950
    fffff880 '031a2b90 fffffa80' 0d67d950: 00000000'00230047 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000001

    00000000' 00000000: 0xfffff880'031a2e00
    fffff880 '031a2b98 00000000' 00230047: 00000000'00000000 00000000'00000001 00000000'00000000

    fffff8a0'05c3b700: 0xfffffa80'0d67d950
    fffff880 '031a2ba0 00000000' 00000000: 00000000'00000001 00000000'00000000 fffff8a0'05c3b700

    fffff880'031a2c78: 0 x 230047

    nvkflt.sys

    Driver Description: Filter driver NVIDIA Graphics

    Driver update site: http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx

    Make sure all your display drivers are updated and if this does not work, uninstall and perform a clean installation.

    Guide on how to install the NVIDIA Windows 7/Windows Vista display driver (even in windows 8)

    http://NVIDIA.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/A_ID/2900/~/guide-on-how-to-install-the-NVIDIA-display-driver-under-Windows-7%2Fwindows-Vista

    Good luck

  • Satellite L655 - upgrade RAM causes the system crash

    I bought and inserted 2 RAM Kingston 4 GB chips. When I boot the Windows and Ubuntu 14.04 (I have a dual boot) fails.

    If I run a test memory Ubuntu start menu, the system hangs.

    I put the old RAM and all is well.

    To resolve this problem, I tried upgrading the BIOS firmware using the software available on the Toshiba site, but it gives me an error saying that the battery must be fully charged and the power adapter is connected. A fully charged battery with the charger plugged still gives the same error. I replaced the battery, which was old and lasted 5 minutes, but the error remains on the upgrade of the bios.

    Any ideas what could be causing this would be appreciated.

    Can I get hold of a BIOS upgrade CD ISO which does not check the status of the battery and the charger? I promise you I will not let the of of the machine while upgrading the bios is going forward!

    Thanks in advance.

    Hello

    At first, I must say that updating the BIOS won't help you any. Many people think that the update of the BIOS is a kind of "quick fix" for different questions.
    In my opinion there must be a compatibility problem. Did you buy the memory right modules approved for your system?

    I don't know what 665 do you have exactly, but I think that you need the modules of DDR3 - 1066 MHz and 4 GB of RAM has part number PA3677U-1M4G.

  • How to know which update causes the system crash

    Can you tell us how to check the update is the culprit?

    Hi Steve,.

    Inorder to know which update is the cause of the crash of the system, you can install the updates one by one. Firstly uninstall the updates that have been recently installed.

    Uninstall the update:

    1. click on start and type "update installed" in the searc box. Click on view installed updates

    2. right click on the update you want to uninstall. Once the uninstall is complete, reboot the computer.

    3. install the updates one by one.

    You would get to know what update is at the origin of the disorder. You can hide this particular update.

  • High resolution monitor and VMware Workstation, causing the system to hang

    I usually like VMware / WS... I used VMware / WS for many years with problems little / not serious - until recently.

    I'm under WS 6.5.1 on MS/Windows/XP/Pro/SP2 (host), and 2 guests of virtual machines: RHEL4 and MS/Windows/XP/PRO.

    Recently I bought a SAMSUNG T260 (1920 x 1200) high-resolution screen - I really like (I also used SAMSUNG monitors for many years with little / no serious problems).

    Currently, I am frequently (several times a day) see the two VMware / WS (all guests) and my XP any host COMPLETELY FREEZES up.  The only way out of this is perhaps a shutoff of the system and then restart.

    Needless to say it is (IMHO) a OFF THE CHARTS SERIOUS PROBLEM... with all fingers pointing to VMware / WS (TBD).

    Previously, I was running on a HP low resolution screen 1280 x 1024.  I can run for days/months/still without seeing the problem above.

    Also, I believe many/most/all lower resolution monitors is likely no other problems (be it).

    This is a 'system to freeze the scenario:

    1 pass to MS/Win/XP vm host RHEL (mode full-screen)

    2. press quickly on full screen non-plein screen

    3. If I do the above too fast my entire army system freezes up.

    Any body else see something like that?  Any ideas/help/suggestions will be appreciated.

    Mark

    PS/BTW - I've seen this problem originally under 6.0.3

    Are you running the latest drivers for your videocard host?  Video drivers are complex enough that they almost always end up containing pretty serious bugs and VMware video cards use is broad enough for us fires frequently these questions.  If upgrading the drivers didn't help not can you let us know:

    -What graphics card and cpu type is your host machine?

    -Don't you update of tools in two virtual machines?

    -What is your workload, particularly in the XP VM?

    -3D acceleration enabled in the XP VM is?

  • Causing the system RMAN backups for not responding

    Need some help here. I inherited a system in which has about 65 GB memory, Linux 64 - bit - 16 processors. Whenever an RMAN backup is performed, else cannot do anything. The load average is about 10 (max). My theory is that it is the init.ora parameters, but not sure... Here's the deal:

    SGA_MAX_SIZE = 47GB
    SGA_TARGET = 0
    shared_pool_size = 5G
    JAVA_POOL_SIZE = 1 G
    LARGE_POOL_SIZE = 0
    db_cache_size = 38G

    I'll look into what I have to change. I just wanted to get other opinions since I inherited a wasp nest and need elements good enough before you can change all the settings. All documents, Metalink, etc that you can provide to support a change in these parameters would be great. Thank you.

    Hello

    You can check http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96566/rcmtunin.htm

    You can use the formula to set the size of the pool. If you do not install the largest basin of the rman uses memory of shared pool which can cause the problem of e/s/execution.

    LARGE_POOL_SIZE = number_of_allocated_channels * (16 MB + (4 * size_of_tape_buffer))

    Hope this will help you.

    Thank you
    Krishna

  • Replacing an old hard drive causes the system had become unbootable

    OK, here's the scenario.

    Background:
    My old computer with Windows XP has been installed on a hard disk of 40 GB. Later through subsequent updates, I bought the upgrade Windows Vista Professional (retail) and proceeded to install Vista on a brand new 250 GB hard drive. Initially, he had some problems I did a clean install with upgrade to Vista, but then with the help of Mircrosoft support (and several hours of reformats and corrupt the old installation of XP) managed to get Vista installed hard disk new and active. I kept the old drive hard in the computer for about a year, but then noticed that he was starting to get out. I moved all the old information off the drive and recently bought a 1 TB drive to replace. I deleted everything that above with the exception of a few remaining files that won't let me not delete - documents and settings and startup records, respectively.

    Problem:
    When I take the old 40 GB hard drive to reside on Windows XP, my computer when startup is unable to find a drive it can boot from. Under disk management, it is labeled as system - even if the windows directory is on a completely separate drive. My intention was to replace the old hard drive, but I can't get my computer to recognize that it is not on the system drive somehow.

    Question:
    Is it possible to change what hard drive is recognized as a system disk or make sure I can get out the old hard drive and still keep my bootable system?

    Hello Lightningfst,

    Thanks for posting in the Microsoft answers Forum.  First off I would say that, before trying any of the suggestions I'm about to do that you completely back up the contents of the drive with Vista Business as a precaution.  The first suggestion I have is to copy the MBR of the disk of 40G to 250G drive.  It could be as simple as that.  However, when Windows sees a drive and initializes it, Windows writes a serial number of 4 bytes in the MBR (sector 0) of the disc. No matter what partition you create on this disc is then associated with the serial number and the drive letter that the partition is given.

    When you then progress to clone a boot partition on the new disk with a cloning program that does not copy the MBR, the serial number of the old drive is not copied to the new disk, so the new disk retains its serial number Windows has seen before.

    When Windows starts on the new disc, he sees the serial number of the new drive and guess the partition that is on that now belongs to the previously selected drive letter which is almost always not C:. Since installing Windows starts on C:, there is now no C: drive when Windows starts. Trying to connect allows Windows attempts to load the user from C:\Documents and Settings\registry, and the C: drive is not there, so Windows simply to abandon the attempt to logon and closes a session back.

    If this happens to you after copy the MBR of the disk of 40G to 150G Unit let us know and we can help you solve the problems that.  I hope this information is useful.

    Thank you

    Jack

    Jack
    Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

  • Vista SP2 enterprise. Updates to Windows from 11 August caused the system hang after starting.

    Œuvres of mouse pointer, but the catch systems when I click on any element of the bar of tasks or office. OK works in safe mode. System Restore to a date before the updates does not help. I've eliminated all unnecessary programs in menu start, including NVIDIA drivers, but the problem persists.  Any suggestions?  Thank you!

    Hi Mathew and Imran;

    Thank you.  After several reboots, add and remove services, I believe a solution to the problem.   It seems that McAfee Total Protection disliked among updates August 11... or the update did not like 'total Protection '.

    After much frustration, I removed any trace of McAfee, first using windows uninstaller, then running the downloaded program to uninstall McAfee. I then installed Microsoft Security Essentials and downloaded and re-installed McAfee Site Advisor.

    I don't think I have the same level of protection as I had before, but the system is faster and I think that I have an adequate level of security.  I'll leave it as it is for now.

    I don't want this post as a blow against McAfee, they are an industry leader in computer security and 'Total Protection' provided exactly that.  We have a second PC in our House... material of identical office however, but under Vista Home Premium, whereas this one is running Vista Business.  Home Premium system runs 'Total Protection' and has not experienced the same problem, as the system of the company.  What's up mind dat?  It runs more slowly, probably because of McAfee files analysis procedures.

    If Security Essentials works well in the coming months on this system, I can install it on the other system, as well as on my laptop.  In more than 10 years (from Windows 98 to Vista), we always used McAfee products and have NEVER had a viral infection.  Is it because of MCafee or our own due diligence?  Assume that this is not serious.

    Thanks again for your help.  You got me on the right track!  Best regards... TeeDubTW

  • VMWare Converter cause the system to hang to cold start 96% and no converter available to the licensee of vSphere 4.1

    Hello

    I'm trying to convert a Windows 2008 Server; everything seems to go along very well until we reach 96% and then it causes either the server BSOD or just hang.  I have read and found mention of the cold start conversion which is apparently available to subscribers from business 3.x.

    Does anyone have a good suggestion as to what I might try next?

    I have attached the logs, but I don't know where to look (aside from the bottom of the last log).

    If you have a license for vCenter Server 4.1, you should be able to download the latest converter BootCD. You will find when you go to the vSphere download section and click on the 'View history' link for the vcenter Server. From there, select modules and VMware vCenter Server 4.0 Update 3

    André

  • WhatWhere is the plug-incontainer? happened to the plugin container? He disappeared with the latest version and now firefox crashes several times a day.

    I do not see the plugin container in the task manager of Windows since the last update of Firefox and now FF freezes several times per day (since the previous update, before yesterday). It takes several minutes after that I see this until it thaws, and it is faster the "end task" and restart Firefox to wait. This most often seems to happen when the computer has been idle for a certain time, rather than when I use it.

    Be sure to let the process of plugin-container in the firewall.

  • FF 8 causes flash to not however with load after you open the Task Manager and open the plugin container folder, everything works fine

    New upgrade FF and all the flash based video site does not load and makes computer almost hang. After I open the Task Manager and go to the folder where is the plugin container, everything works back. I don't do anything at all after opening the folder.

    What kind of error is it? Its very strange. If all goes well, there is a fix for this.

    Another method would be to uninstall FF and install FF8.0 and not use the upgrade FF7.0. It worked for me.

  • Why plugin - container.exe crash so often during the closing of PDF files?

    When I load multiple PDF files in Firefox to check their content for the errors one by one, closing a tab PDF to reveal another tab PDF very often causes plugin - container.exe planting, which means I have to reload each tab PDF remaining to display the remaining files. This of course defeated the purpose to open more than one at the time and adds about 5 times because the number of clicks to the whole process because I erase the mistake and reload each page, then it might happen again or not. It produced whenever I close a PDF file, but about 1/4 times.

    I know that I have two versions of Acrobat installed (9.5.5 of Acrobat and Reader 11.0.10) and therefore two Firefox plugins, but for the record that this same thing happening on other computers that just have Reader or simply Acrobat, this isn't a matter of conflicting plugins. Although I noticed that you are not allowed to disable one or the other - a disable disables both. As a first step, it does not appear, but if you reload the plugins page, you will see that the two are actually off.

    Windows coughs following error report when the plugin - container.exe grave failure, but Firefox says nothing, I guess because the plugin-container is a stand-alone application:

    Signature of the problem:

     Problem Event Name:	APPCRASH
     Application Name:	plugin-container.exe
     Application Version:	36.0.4.5557
     Application Timestamp:	550d0883
     Fault Module Name:	xul.dll
     Fault Module Version:	36.0.4.5557
     Fault Module Timestamp:	550d07d2
     Exception Code:	c0000005
     Exception Offset:	011f734a
     OS Version:	6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.48
     Locale ID:	1033
     Additional Information 1:	0a9e
     Additional Information 2:	0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
     Additional Information 3:	0a9e
     Additional Information 4:	0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
    

    Appreciate any help available in the resolution of this crash.

    Looks like this problem has been fixed in 37.0.1. Thank you all.

  • Why plugin - container.exe shows the process when I disabled all extensions and plug-ins?

    Firefox has been slow, locking and become insensitive since 27.0, I now 28.0 installed, but no difference. I suspect the plugin container could cause or contribute to this. You kindly told me why it is still in progress when everything is turned off, I would like to block. In addition, how comes I can watch a YouTube video when the Flash is turned off? I have the original - this plug-in is disabled - view, and then the video begins to play?

    It is possible that the HTML5 Media Player is used to play videos.

    If the Flash player would be the you get the context menu Flash Player if you right click on the video player.

    Start Firefox in Safe Mode to check if one of the extensions (Firefox/tools > Modules > Extensions) or if hardware acceleration is the cause of the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/tools > Modules > appearance).

    • Do NOT click on the reset button on the startup window Mode without failure.

    You can create a new profile as a test to see if your profile is the source of the problem.

    See "create a profile":

    If the new profile works then you can transfer files from a profile already used in the new profile, but be careful not to copy files corrupted to avoid transporting on the problem

  • Version 3.6 still has the plugin - container.exe?

    Plugin - container.exe causing me huge problems with crashes, hangs, the CPU usage in the range of 90-100% and he seems to force the cooling fan to run at maximum at all times. It makes the computer useless as anything other than an extremely noisy Clipboard and attempts to solve the problem failed. This is why I want to downgrade to a version that does not have this terrible thing.

    Is the oldest version (3.6.0 from what I can see) have plugin container.exe?

    Yes, he does.

  • plugin - container.exe takes up and uses 100% of my CPU locking me and leaving my non-functional PC. Is it a bug or a memory, leak in the Firefox software? Can we do anything to solve this problem?

    Looking at the Windows Task Manager, I found this plugin - container.exe took over 100% of my CPU and my system froze. Is this a leak memory or another bug?

    plugin - container.exe is simply a third wrapper 3 plug-ins. This plug-in is loaded? The bug is with this plugin (Flash for example)

Maybe you are looking for