Possible bug: function ReadySHARE R7000 - V1.0.6.40_1.1.90

The ReadySHARE funsction do not work normally.

Functions-> ReadySHARE USB-> available network folders
Cannot use the button

Please correct the problem.

Hi daniel0615,

I have used change it, create the network folder, and delete buttons using the beta firmware. You must ensure that Blocker is not enabled in your browser.

Tags: Netgear

Similar Questions

  • possible bug? formatting number 0 is displayed as 4 294 967 295

    This is really two questions in one. First of all, I have a routine that sometimes gives a result of 0, which is * sometimes * displayed in an AdvancedDataGrid column in the form of 4 294 967 295, which I assume is somehow a significant number (more big int?). In any case, I have one ADG with a column defined as:

    < mx:AdvancedDataGridColumn headerText = "Remaining work" labelFunction = "rem_work_fmt" textAlign = "right" / >

    The called labelFunction is illustrated below:

    private void rem_work_fmt(item:Object,_column:AdvancedDataGridColumn):String
    {
    var num:String = numberFormatter.format (item.get_remaining_work ());
    trace ("result:" + num);
    return num;
    }
    Track of exit impressions: "result: 0" as expected, but the number displayed in the grid is sometimes 0 and 4294967295 sometimes.

    More strangeness, this only happens to the last column in the ADG. I call the same logic of format on another column and have never seen a wrong result. In addition, the same 'get_remaining_work()' function is called on the same data and the result is properly displayed in a field of text as 0.

    Second question, I met a few other possible bugs, I didn't report because I found a work around. How to do that in the beta program?

    LW1001,

    Bugs can be filed in the public bug at http://bugs.adobe.com/flex/
    You will need to register before you can submit bugs.
    Also, if you can attach files to bug to the bug report, it makes it much easier for Adobe to investigate.

    Let me know if you have any other questions/problems.

    Peter

  • Are you aware of a possible bug in the version 3.6.23? In the browser, for example, "two /" appears with the slash through the 'o'. Is this a known bug? Thank you

    Are you aware of a possible bug in the version 3.6.23? In the browser, for example, "two /" appears with the slash through the 'o'. Is this a known bug?

    When the same text is seen in another browser, it is displayed correctly as "two."

    The same question is displayed on another computer.

    Thank you.

    Sounds that you use a font that supports ligatures (Palatino?).

  • possible bug in match pattern string of dot and a special character

    Hi friend recently and I find something in game chain model that it looks like bug, I want to know labveiw expert opinion on it
    the possible bug is
    have you ever tried to match (.) dot for use in regular expression? this icon could not find the point inside the string? 
    I also think what happens if we try to find a character within a string that is a piece of special character
    for example how you can use this icon to find \b inside the string as (hatef\blabview)?

    [.] to find the period

    \\B to find the backslash b

  • Possible bug: save the table with double and extended precision to the worksheet

    If one concatenates an array of double-precision and an array of precision extended with the 'build' vi table, then recorded using 'Write in a spreadsheet file' vi any digits to the right of the decimal are reset to zero in the saved file. Regardless of the entry of signifier of format (for example %.10f) to the vi 'Write in a spreadsheet file'.

    I'm on Vista Ultimate 32 bit and labview 9.0

    This is a possible bug that is easily circumvented by the conversion of a type before you incorporate arrar in a worksheet. Nevertheless, it's a bug and it cost me some time.

    Hi JL,.

    No, this is not a bug - it's a feature

    Well, if you'd look closer you would recognize the 'save to spreadsheet' as polymorphic VI. As this polymorphic VI does not support the EXTENSION numbers internally (it only supports DBL, I64, and String) LabVIEW selects the instance with more precision: I64 (I64 a 64 bits of precision, DBL that 53...). Your options are:

    -the value of the instance to use as the DBL (by right click and "Select type... »)

    -make a copy of this VI, save it under a different name and make support number of POST (not rework the polymorphic VI like you would break compatibility with other facilities of LV or future revisions)

  • Possible bug on role assignments

    I am using SOA/BPM 11.1.1.7.

    I found a possible bug when you deploy a BPM Application which mixed assignments (some directly to one user, others to a role of Application BPM (created in the workspace).

    I did two tests.

    Test 1.  Created a project/process of BPM with two lanes.  In organization, I assigned the roles of corridor users (to the embedded Weblogic LDAP).  On deployment, these roles were driven from the area space of work/Administration/roles (when logged in as a Weblogic).

    Test 2.

    In the workspace I created a few BPM roles (and put assignments users), then in a project of assigned BPM Application roles to my role of corridor.

    However, I created a corridor and made the assignment directly to the user.

    On deployment, the role which has been directly attributed to the user at the level of BPM projects has been eliminated NOT to the role area.

    A video of it is here: http://youtu.be/bWtEIRavlEY

    Stuart

    Hi Stuart,

    Could check you how your mapping roles work if you check "deployment of existing objects of update on ' option in organization.xml?

  • APEX translated application 4.2 available possible bugs on theme 25

    Hello everyone,

    I try APEX 4.2 with reactive Blue theme (theme 25). So far so good. When I tried to do an application translated from my one shot (I don't translate any string, just de-seeded and released the app), I discovered some possible bugs on the page layout. For example, in areas of form, fields with the scope of auto column cannot be aligned in the same line. They are moved to a new line, although in the original application, it works. I know it's easy to fix by setting a specific value in the scope of column. But how can I fix the page layout in the pages who are magicians (with the standard model of region) and fields are placed in the table not div like in the initial application. Is there a difference between a translated application (which is actually not yet translated) and on the initial page rendering?

    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Grandmaster,

    I think that you are hit bug 15922307 - model of presentation of the grid of a translation application is not used
    who sets us 4.2.1.00.08. Can you check if you're on this version or if you are still on APEX 4.2.0

    Concerning
    Patrick
    -----------
    Member of the APEX development team

    My Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
    APEX Plug-Ins: http://apex.oracle.com/plugins
    Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/patrickwolf

  • Possible bug in a Select NULL-option list

    Hi all
    I tried to use a list to select a tabular form and found a possible bug.
    I have reproduced the issue on apex.oracle.com.
    Please visit http://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=38499:2.
    It seems that the fields for 'Display value Null' and 'return Null value are switched.
    Can someone try this and tell me if I'm doing something wrong or it's really a bug?

    Kind regards
    Moritz

    Hello

    what I saw bug # 10095760 has been filed for this issue.

    Concerning
    Patrick
    -----------
    My Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
    APEX 4.0 Plug-Ins: http://apex.oracle.com/plugins
    Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/patrickwolf

  • possible bug in class date

    I stumbled upon a possible bug in the class Date. When comparing two dates of November 20, 2007 and on November 22, 2007, I get false logic.

    public var expireDate: Date = new Date ("2007", "11", "20");
    public var todaysDate:Date = new Date();

    If (todaysDate.getTime () > = expireDate.getTime ())
    {
    this.currentState = "courseExpired";
    }
    on the other
    {
    this.currentState = 'loggedIn ';
    }

    todaysDate.getTime (returned): 1198126800000

    expireDate.getTime (returned): 1195742469234

    But whatever happens, todaysDate wins even if it shouldn't. Courses should have shown have expired.

    probably because the month is zero means the basis therefore 11 December November not :) (I know its not very obvious, but it's like that in flex and java as well).

  • possible bug: ListCollectionView.addAll with filter function

    Hello

    I wrote this post in the "General Discussion" Forum "LFex sdk", I also put it there.

    I think I found a bug in the flex SDK. I checked in JIRA and it seems it is not reported.
    This simple code raise an 'out of bouds exception' (flex SDK 4.1):

    var list: collection ArrayCollection = new ArrayCollection();

    list.filterFunction = filter;

    List.Refresh ();

    var items: ArrayList = new ArrayList ([1,2,3,4,5]);

    list.addAll (items);

    Function filter(obj:Object): Boolean {}

    var n: Number is obj in numbers;.

    return n < 2;

    }

    I checked the code in mx.collections.ListCollectionView and it's obvious: addAll called addAllAt. "addAllAt" launches a call loop on the list to add and calling the addItemAt for each element, but it increments the index arguments, even if the previous item has not really added (because of a restriction of the filter), and the "out of bounds exception occurs. In my opinion, addAllAt must be changed as as follows:

    current version:

    public function addAllAt (addList:IList, index: int):void {}

    var length: int = addList.length;

    for (var i: int = 0; i < length; i ++)

    {

    this.addItemAt (addList.getItemAt (i), I + index);

    }

    }

    proposed version:

    public function addAllAt (addList:IList, index: int):void {}

    var length: int = addList.length;

    for (var i: int = 0; i < length; i ++)

    {

    var to: int = I + index;

    if(at>Length) {}

    a = length;

    }

    this.addItemAt (addList.getItemAt (i), to);

    }

    }

    Should I open a bug? Or am I missing something?

    M1kal

    Fill out a bug report.

  • Possible bug - PLS-00372 creating BODY calculation of the PL/SQL FUNCTION

    3.2 on Oracle APEX: 10 x e

    I was creating a calculation for a page element by using the type 'BODY of the PL/SQL FUNCTION '. Step by step in the wizard when I entered my code block, I received the error PLS-00372. Here is the code:

    DECLARE
    l_return person_v.full_name%TYPE: = 'UNKNOWN ';
    BEGIN

    SELECT full_name
    IN l_return
    OF person_v
    WHERE party_id =: P230_CONTACTED_PARTY_ID;

    RETURN l_return;
    EXCEPTION
    WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN
    RETURN l_return;
    END;

    If I change my name of the variable to another thing that l_return the error disappears. Later, I can't change the name of the variable in l_return and I do not get the error if it seems to be the validation happening on just this page of the wizard.

    Greg - it's because of a quirk in the validation, like imagine you. Workaround is to put a space between return characters and the terminal semi-colon, for example:

    RETURN l_return;

    Scott

  • Possible bug in sv_Harmonic distortion and Noise.vi

    Hello

    I ran into what seems to be a bug in distortion and Noise.vi sv_Harmonic

    I call this VI into a higher level VI which is part of the box sound & Vibration tool (SVT SNR without harmonic (time) (1ch) .vi)

    What is happening is that I sometimes get error 0xFFFFB1A3 (-20061):

    Error-20061 occurred at NI_MABase.lvlibine Waveform.vi:22 > NI_MABase.lvlib:ma_Trap Fgen parameter Errors.vi:1
    frequency must be<= sampling="">

    Possible reasons:

    Analysis: The selection is not valid.

    This error is actually produced in distortion and Noise.vi sv_Harmonic by one of his subVIs (your unique information (complex) .vi svc_Extract) although I'm not able to activate debugging for this VI so I can't dig deeper.

    What seems to be the case, it is for certain fundamental frequencies that result in higher order harmonic which is located very close to Fs/2, you get the error.  I have attached a waveform and a simple VI that generates the error.  My debugging, it seems that the error occurred when the code attempts to extract the harmonic at 5119,53 Hz.  FS/2 is 5120Hz, so it must be valid, but generates an error.

    Thank you

    -mat

    Hey Matt,

    I spoke with R & D and the source of this problem is we're detects peaking at exactly the Nyquist frequency for the 127th harmonic, while it should work, we get the false error. To work around the problem, you can specify the frequency range of 0-126 harmonics as seen in the image below.  Have one less harmonic should not be a big problem as the harmonic 127th is anyway in the noise.  R & D is now aware of the issue and look forward to it.   Thank you!

  • Possible bug found in hyperlinkctrl.c when you use the "VAL_POINTING_FINGER_CURSOR" mouse cursor in your own user interface.

    Hi people, I think I found a bug in the hyperlinkctrl.c custom control, after the update/upgrade an old project CVI.

    I found when I started using the "VAL_POINTING_FINGER_CURSOR" mouse in my UI, when adding a new hyperlink control.

    The error is recoverable error: ' from the mouse cursor is not valid.

    This error breaks in RunUserInterface (never seen anything like this before and I use CVI since version 3.1).

    This happens whenever I mouse - hovering anywhere on the Panel that contains the new hyperlink control.

    I also had a hack temporary to solve the problem, for now, I'll pass it along to this announcement...

    The hyperlink control's source code is located in \toolslib\custctrl\hyperlinkctrl.c

    The bug/problem lies in the service of reminder (of HyperLinkPanelCallback), specifically in lines 460 to 465.

    This hyperlink control wants to use the VAL_POINTING_FINGER_CURSOR as its default cursor when you hover over the custom hyperlink.

    However, if you already use 'VAL_POINTING_FINGER_CURSOR' in your user interface, the branch which verifies that you use what he thinks is 'his own' thread-safe mouse cursor ID, so that can reset it by using his "token concatenation" - created macro "GetTsvCursor", is not an 'else' branch to protect the picture when you actually use the cursor pointing finger... where the error that the mouse cursor is not valid. Here is the snippet of these lines.

    The mouse is not over a hyperlink
    If (cursor is VAL_POINTING_FINGER_CURSOR)
    {
    Reset the cursor to the previous cached cursor
    cursor = GetTsvCursor();
    errChk (SetMouseCursor (cursor));

    ... etc...

    }

    So my hack was to change the type of cursor to "VAL_CHECK_CURSOR" in place and place the cursor of "VAL_POINTING_FINGER_CURSOR" in three locations in this function, then rebuilt files x 86 and x 64.

    Hey Luis, finally win a free T-shirt of LabWindows/CVI with not only have reported this bug, but also to give the precise location of the source, as well as a work around?

    :^)

    JB

    In the meantime, I have submitted a bug with ID #545203 report to track down this problem.

    -Johannes

  • vsscanf problem: possible BUG?

    Hi guys,.

    I've lived a strange effect, and if I didn't have (to be confirmed) error, a problem inside the vsscanf function and, possibly, the scanf, sscanf family...

    In fact, to summarize the context, I did a few line of code to read from a file where data is written in ASCII.

    10 columns, 1 will receive an integer 'index', 9 columns remaining will receive some "analog" value with 3 or 6 digits.

    Here are the 3 extracted lines of the file

    000007 ~ 0.000280 ~ 0.020 ~-148.535 ~ 149.590 ~ 0,124 ~ 0,180 ~ 7.671 ~ 38.356 ~ 0,170
    000008 ~ 0.000320 ~ 0.020 ~-148.535 ~ 149.590 ~ 0,124 ~ 0,180 ~ 7.671 ~ 38.356 ~ 0,170
    000009 ~ 0.000360 ~ 0,023 ~-148.535 ~ 149.590 ~ 0,149 ~ 0.139 ~ 7.721 ~ 38.606 ~ 0,170 (where ~ is the tank of tab: '\t')

    To get a file quite easily modifiable, I kept the number of digits in the 1st field constant, to be always the same number of digits (here 6)... This is why in this case, we have 5 zeros before.

    The problem is ALWAYS the same:

    When I at least 1 zero 1 character of the line (for example 000008 but also 0124824 or 001542 but NOT 100020 or 106430)

    AND

    The 1st field include the figure: 8 or 9 and only these numbers (for example 000008 but not 000007)

    THEN, my 1st converted analog value (double1 in the code) in the next argument will be to float the 1st field value:

    double1 will receive 0.000280 in the analysis of the 1st line, it is normal.

    double1 will receive 8.0000 and 9.0000 for the last 2 lines extracted from the file. It is NOT normal at all

    Of course, it is always used of the same service, same format string, I also checked the data before the vsscanf (string Templine) and the return of the vsscanf are still 10 and that's right, the number of the parameter analyzed.

    Is someone have already experienced somethings like that?

    Is anyone able to reproduce this problem?

    Is someone with some sort of explanation, or everything just detected a possible error in my code.

    Any help is welcome

    Thanks in advance.

    Damien Hoyen

    Now, I have used the following code:

    int LineIndex;

    Double double1, or 2, double3 - to - double9;

    ReadLineFromFile (FileHandle,"%i\t%lf\t%lf\t%lf\t%lf\t%lf\t%lf\t%lf\t%lf\t%lf",&LineIndex,
    & double1,
    & or 2,
    & double3,
    & double4,

    & double5,
    & double6,
    & double7,
    & double8,

    & double9};

    with:

    int ReadLineFromFile (int FileHandle, char * FmtStr,...)
    {
     
    TempLine char [1024];
    int Status;
     
    start multi arg
    va_list args;
    va_start (args, FmtStr);

    Check the validity of the FmtStr
    assert (FmtStr! = NULL);
      
    Memset (TempLine, 0, 1024);
      
    Read line
    Status = ReadLine (descriptor file, TempLine, (1023));
    Parse

    Status = vsscanf (TempLine, FmtStr, args);
     
    va_end (args);
    Return (Status);
    }

    a catch of jr_2005.

    I will be his response: using %d in the format string always a decimal number, while %i tries to find the base of the number and bed octal if it starts with 0.

    (I don't have never seen anything so flawed by specifying an octal number by adding only a 0, as if people ever add a 0 to the decimal numbers... it's just another screw up in the long list of why C is one of the worst programming language ever invented.)

  • Possible bug-&gt; CompactDAQ synchronization between HAVE and counter - sync error depends on the sampling frequency (exactly).

    I have a system with a map of the 9234 compactDAQ 4 Groove and a 9401 in slot 5.

    I use a function generator to create a 5V square wave frequency sweep.

    The frequency of scans from 1 Hz to 10 Hz in 3 seconds.

    I have this tee in my door to counter 0 (PFI1 - 16 Pin) and an analog input channel 0.

    In LabView, I do a period measure counter that has a trigger defined on the trigger to start ArmStart HAVE.

    Piecemeal the signal into two channels, I see the time counter correspond to zero-level positive slope crossings in the data to HAVE it.

    By the presence of a square with a mutation frequency wave, I know for sure that the time is not out of a period.

    I noticed the downturn to take samples, the greatest moment of the synchronization error.

    Here is the data that I have saved:

    sampling rate 1 / (sync error times)

    51200 1250

    25600 625

    10240 256

    2048 51.8

    1651 37

    It worked of Y = 0,0244 X + 1.1262 with R ^ 2 = 1.0

    So it could be, I have a programming error, or that there is a bug in the hardware or the base software.

    Thanks for any help to understand this question.

    BTW, I use this system to make an analysis program in the stopped vehicle with direct sequence over time - of course analysis based on the revolutions.  I found that order analytical tools was not flexible enough for what I had done, so I started from the ground upward.

    Hi Greg,.

    Looks like you see the entry delay the NI 9234 (Group delay).   As specified in the instructions for use NI 9234, entry delay is equal to 38.4 / fs + 3.2us.  This is because of how the sigma delta ADC works - after the start, it must acquire a certain number of samples before returning the first valid sample.  This delay is expected.

    Here is a knowledge base on the subject.  There are a lot more, just do a search of the knowledge base for "group delay.

Maybe you are looking for