Query where clause of different table without data

Similar Questions

• a slightly different similar query where clause

  Hi all, I am facing a problem with my request.
  I have a query that looks like this
  
  with names like
  (select name, lastname, id
  FROM table1
  where id = 1
  and type = "enu".
  and asset = 'other '.
  and cashid = 2
  and $vdate = system_date
  )
  Select * from names
  (< joins with other tables)
  
  the thing is that enu value is past as parameter of the procedure. This is only of value if away from the front end.
  further, I have to spend 2 different values now ("cae", "peq")
  However, for these two values, of what I need not use the active column in where clause and the cashid will have to be change to cashid in (3.4)
  
  I was thinking a dynamic query construction and function of the value pass, I'll build the query. I am looking for another way to implement these changes with minimal impact on the code. Anyone know how to go around this case?
  
  with these two new values for the query are very similar with the exception of the active column that is more use and cashid will include an IN clause. only a value will be in the procedure, either enu, cae, peq. for enu, the query must be as above, but for the other two active column values are not in the query and cashid must be cashid in (3.4). How to take care of these scenarios

  with names as
  (select name, lastname, id
     from table1
    where id = 1
      and (
      (type = 'enu' and asset = 'others' and cashid =2)
      or
      (type in ('cae','peq') and cashid in (3,4))
      )
      and vdate = system_date
  )
  select * from names
  
  

  Max

• Move the schema objects to a different database without data

  Hi all

  I have to migrate schema objects in one database to another without data. Help, please.

  Kind regards

  Cherkaoui

  Hello

  Please read the doc, there is option

  CONTENT = {ALL |} DATA_ONLY | METADATA_ONLY}

  ALL loads all data and metadata contained in the source. It is the default value.

  DATA_ONLY only loads the data in row of table in the existing tables; No database object is created.

  METADATA_ONLY only loads the database object definitions; No data line of the table is loaded.

  so in your case, you can use CONTENT = METADATA_ONLY

  HTH

• Best place to initialize the View object query where clause or params

  Where is the best place to initialize the View object 'where' clause before the page is initially rendered? Or how should it be done?
  Specifically, I can't set these values in the entity or view objects because I need information from the user or information Session
  the user has entered before you navigate to the page. I want to prepare the View object so that the results of the query appears something reasonable
  the first time before using chooses search.
  
  Note: The view object must exist and I need to access managed beans to define the query.
  
  Is there an event hook (java code) that can be called before the page is rendered?
  Also, there are hooks that can be called when the user navigates to another tab or page?
  
  Published by: Greateful Sep 6, 2012 19:48

  Hello

  Check out this blog: https://blogs.oracle.com/aramamoo/entry/an_epic_question_how_to

  Arun-

• How can I export the schema with all objects and a few tables without data

  Hi all
  
  Verion 10g EA.
  I export the schema with all objects but I need ignored some of the data in the table.
  
  There is a table 4 people gave huge, we need not to export data from tables but structure must export.
  
  
  Thank you
  Nr

  You can do this with a single command.  Run your export as usual and add the query parameters for 4 tables you want all the lines:

  expdp... query = schema1.table1: "where rownum = 0" query = schema2.table2: 'where rownum = 0'...

  It is best to place the query parameters in a parameter file if you don't have to worry about escaping special characters of the OS.

  Dean

• selection of values to query where clause

  Hi guys, it of maybe a silly question but do not know if I approach the solution in the correct engineering.
  
  At the top of my form, I framed that the user fills out the different values. These values are then used to refine the query results in the block below. I know that I can go in the datablock being interrogated and set the where the clause equal to the value of the text boxes above, but I don't feel it is the right place to do it.
  
  If I do like this when the above text box is empty, it returns no results when infact I want to ask all if the values are left white. So should I put it in motion pre? If so how should we do?
  
  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
  
  Thank you.

  In the trigger of the QUERY before block you, just put the value in the corresponding element

    :block.name := :ctrl.selection ;
  

  François

• left outer join and the where clause for the table to the right

  I want to join two tables a and b, where a is a must and b is a result set in option. When I use a left outer join to a to b, I want to achieve:
  
  1. Select a single column, two columns of b (not the join columns)
  2 - even if theres no friendly on the join column does not return data from one.
  3. If there is a match applies when the criteria on column b (table in option)
  
  so, how can I avoid no_data_found in this case? When I apply where criteria for b, so it does not return the data from one, which is a must.

  Sounds like a regular outer join to me...

  select a.col1, b.col2, b.col2
  from   tableA a
         left outer join tableB b
         on (a.id = b.id and b.colX = 'X')
  

• How can get the structure of the table without data

  Hai All
  
  
  I have two tables namely T1, T2 and these have some fields and I need to create a new table and the table two and only the header fields that I need but not the data.
  
  Thanks and greetings
  
  srikkanth. M

  Hello

  Something like that

  SQL> create table emp_bkp as
    2  select * from emp where 1=2;
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL>  select * from emp_bkp;
  
  no rows selected
  
  or
  
  SQL> drop table emp_bkp;
  
  Table dropped.
  
  SQL> create table emp_bkp
    2  as
    3  select e.empno,e.ename,e.deptno,d.dname,e.sal
    4  from emp e,dept d
    5  where e.deptno = d.deptno
    6  and
    7  1=2;
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> select * from emp_bkp;
  
  no rows selected
  
  SQL> desc emp_bkp
   Name                                      Null?    Type
   ----------------------------------------- -------- --------------------------
   EMPNO                                              NUMBER(4)
   ENAME                                              VARCHAR2(10)
   DEPTNO                                             NUMBER(2)
   DNAME                                              VARCHAR2(14)
   SAL                                                NUMBER(7,2)
  

  Twinkle

• Question about the order of evaluation of the clause WHERE CLAUSE when the Oracle OF the syntax used to join tables

  Hello

  Oracle version: 11.1.0.7.0 - 64 bit

  I read the documentation online at joins. The page is avialable here: joins at

  My question is about the join order of evaluation of the conditions in clause and the conditions of those

  are not the join conditions and are placed in the WHERE clause.

  Consider the following pseudocode

  SELECT

  T1. Col1,

  T2.Col1

  Of

  Table1 t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN table2 t2

  WE

  (condition_expression1)

  WHERE

  (condition_expression2)

  Is it correct to say that if there is no column on the status of join (condition_expression1) in condition_expression2, then condition_expression2 is executed before condition_expression1? In other words, oracle always trying to filter based on the WHERE clause individually each table as much as possible before joining them based on the conditions on the article?

  Thanks in advance,

  Hello

  dariyoosh wrote:

  Hello

  Oracle version: 11.1.0.7.0 - 64 bit

  I read the documentation online at joins. The page is avialable here: joins at

  My question is about the join order of evaluation of the conditions in clause and the conditions of those

  are not the join conditions and are placed in the WHERE clause.

  Consider the following pseudocode

  SELECT

  T1. Col1,

  T2.Col1

  Of

  Table1 t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN table2 t2

  WE

  (condition_expression1)

  WHERE

  (condition_expression2)

  Is it correct to say that if there is no column on the status of join (condition_expression1) in condition_expression2, then condition_expression2 is executed before condition_expression1? In other words, oracle always trying to filter based on the WHERE clause individually each table as much as possible before joining them based on the conditions on the article? ...

  The reverse is actually closer to the truth, but we can't really make general statements like that.

  SQL is not a language of the proceedings.  Looking at the code SQL, we could say that the code does, but we cannot say much about how that code it.  In other words, SQL is a language that describes the results you get, not the way to get them.

  The optimizer will do everything what he thinks is faster if it does not change the results.  If any order in which they are applied (in outer joins or CONNECT BY queries, for example), then think of the join is done first, and the value of the WHERE clause is applied to the result of the join.

  Here is a query looks very much like you posted:

  SELECT d.deptno

  e.ename, e.sal

  OF scott.dept d

  LEFT OUTER JOIN scott.emp e ON e.deptno = d.deptno

  WHERE e.sal > = 3000

  ORDER BY d.deptno

  ;

  Output:

  DEPTNO ENAME SAL

  ---------- ---------- ----------

  10 KING 5000

  20 FORD 3000

  20 3000 SCOTT

  The scott.dept table contains deptnos 30 and 40; Why are they not in the result set?  The query behaves as if the outer join is made first (production 15 rows), then the WHERE clause has been applied.  All lines with deptno = 30 had sals down han 3000 and all single line with deptno = 40 was NULL in the sal column, then these lines are excluded (as well as other lines of deptnos 10 and 20), and only 3 lines above are left.

• Complex Inner Join and outer subquery where clause to join internal?

  The DDL for this post was too big and I had to put on my site:
  http://www.harbortownsolutions.com/DDLForDORTable.txt
  
  My goal is to create a report of sales data for 116 stores containing daily sales and count of comments in recent years. My challenge is that I am pulling data from the same table, but with different dates to get data from last year and the week in data from date of last year.
  
  
  The dates used for reports are:
  
  SalesDate = 06/04/2009
  SalesDateForLastYear = 2008-06-05
  SalesDateBeginningOfWeek = 01/06/2009
  SalesDateBginningOFWeekLastYear = 2008-06-02
  
  PSEUDOQUERYS:

  ---======= DOLLAR VARIANCE = You Said you have $100 worth of meat(inventory) but you only have $50 worth of meat
  SELECT 
      BUSI_DATE as BusinessDate, 
      ORACLE_KEY as StoreID,
      FIELD1  as Sales,
      FIELD2  as GuestCount,
      FIELD3  as DollarVariance,
      FIELD4  as Cars
  FROM MYDAILYTOTALS
  WHERE Busi_date = SalesDate
     AND ORACLE_KEY IN (SELECT StoreID From MyStores); 
  -======= ONLY Guest count and Sales are needed in comparisons against last year    
  ---======    Last YEar dates = corresponding dates for this year ie Tuesday of this 
  week matched to Tuesday of last year (except for leap year)
  SELECT 
      ORACLE_KEY as StoreID
      FIELD1  as SalesLastYear
      FIELD2  as GuestCountLastYear   
  FROM MYDAILYTOTALS
  WHERE Busi_date = SalesDateForLastYear 
     AND ORACLE_KEY IN (SELECT StoreID From MyStores);
         
  
  SELECT 
      ORACLE_KEY as StoreID
      SUM(FIELD1)  as WeekToDateSales
      SUM(FIELD2)  as WeekToDateGuestCount  
  FROM MYDAILYTOTALS
  WHERE Busi_date BETWEEN SalesDateBeginningOfWeek and SalesDate
     AND ORACLE_KEY IN (SELECT StoreID From MyStores) 
  GROUP BY ORACLE_KEY 
     --=======  
  SELECT 
      ORACLE_KEY as StoreID
      SUM(FIELD1)  as WeekToDateSalesLastYear
      SUM(FIELD2)  as WeekToDateGuestCountLastYear  
  FROM MYDAILYTOTALS
  WHERE Busi_date BETWEEN SalesDateBeginningOfWeekLastYear and SalesDateLastYear
     AND ORACLE_KEY IN (SELECT StoreID From MyStores) 
  GROUP BY ORACLE_KEY   

  Question: Since they all use the same store of nbrs, I specify on each request? Can't I just specify only once on outer query Where clause?
  
  Also, how would fit the following of HOEK script:
  See how I put 1 field based on another field value
  
  He reads a record for each store of 116 stores in the database. There are 2 situations that have been addressed by Hoeks code:
  For each of the 116 stores in the store table, there must be 1 and only
  registration of 1 stock to match the record of MyStoreTotals. However, sometimes there is no record of inventory.
  and sometimes there will be 2 (in a case where a manager of database updates)
  After daily treatment) files. If so, the record with Is_posted = 1
  is the one that should be included in the query. The following text accomplishes this:
  -chr (39) is the single quote
  

   Select StoreId, 
           DollarVariance 
    from   (select store.storeid, 
                     case
                            when inv.storeid is null then 'None'
                            when inv.is_posted = 0 then 'NP'
                            else chr(39)||inv.total_dol_var||chr(39)
                      end as DollarVariance, 
                      row_number() over (partition by store.storeid order by inv.is_posted desc) rn  
                 from  myInven inv 
                 right outer join mystores  store
                                on store.storeid = inv.fk_str_main_id
                                and inv.busi_date = to_date(SalesDate, 'dd-mon-yyyy'))
        where rn = 1;      

  Can I put this request on the place where clause of the outer to query I put on a JOIN clause?

  So I guess that's why you used the MAX.

  That is right.
  I used CASES to identify and complete the necessary columns since the first set of results (WITH).
  So then I more or less "swivels somehow" lines of this result set to the columns, each store will appear once the most.

• Passing the value of the where clause with the page

  Dear friends,

  I have a requirement like when I select a selection list value I should pass this value to sql query where clause without submitting the page

  ex I have a select like: P1_Dept guess I selects the value 10 in this

  then I have a query select * from emp where deptno =: P1_Dept.

  DB. ORACLE 11G

  APEX 4.1.1.00.23

  is this possible? can someone help me please in this topic

  Thanks and greetings

  Vballeda

  Suppose we have the selection list with the name P1_DEPT and query for report

  select * from emp where deptno = :P1_DEPT
  

  We create dynamic Action on the evolution of the P1_DEPT point. We will need two real actions:

  1-> set value action

  Set the Type - > body of the PL/SQL function

  The function of body - > return 1;

  Page item to submit-> P1_DEPT

  Change to delete-> Yes event

  Selecttion Type-> trigger element

  2. action-> Refresh

  Selecttion Type-> region

  Region-> your region of report

• A CASE statement with additional where clause

  Hi all
  
  I need assistance in which this obligation clause
  
  Table:-balance_table
  
  Columns:-balance_type, balance_amount, balance_month, budget_name
  
  balance_type column had given 'Real' OR 'Budget '.
  
  Now I am trying to extract data such as: if: entered_month is Mar-2009 then before and including Mar-2009 will show real balance sheet Date and after Mar-2009 will show budget data.
  
  It works fine, I need to add a condition more restrict the budget name, there are several budget_name in the table for balance_type = 'Budget '.
  
  
  
  SELECT SUM (balance_amount), balance_type, balance_month
  OF balance_table
  WHERE balance_type =
  (CASE
  WHEN balance_month < =: entered_month
  THEN 'real '.
  ANOTHER 'Budget '.
  END
  )
  AND budget_name = 'BUDGET1.
  Balance_type GROUP, balance_month
  
  Stated above is erroneous because ' AND budget_name = ' BUDGET1 "clause restricts the set of data."
  
  Please help in contrcuting where clause 1) to sort the data according to Budget/actual and 2) for specific budgets, so budget_type = Budget
  
  Thank you
  Bobin

  That should do it.

  SELECT SUM (balance_amount),
         balance_type,
         balance_month
  FROM balance_table
  WHERE (balance_type = 'Actual'
         and balance_month <= :entered_month
        )
  or (balance_type = 'Budget'
      and balance_month > :entered_month
      and budget_name = :entered_budget_name
     )
  GROUP BY balance_type,
           balance_month
  ORDER BY 2
  

  See you soon
  Sarma.

• How to change where clause in VO interview at the bean

  Hi experts

  I need to change vo object query where clause execution... is - it possible?

  If so please suggest me.

  as mentioned by Timo, it is quite possible

  See this link-

  Change in the WHERE clause or query on VO when running in Oracle ADF | Techartifact

  Dynamically change the query in the view object in Oracle ADF | Techartifact

• How can I filter a table of data control without entering the query

  I have a table from a WSDL-based web service data control.
  
  I want to filter the table without input query in the filter text box. Without text filter box, each could filter the table with a query hardcoded internally.
  For example, when the user menu button click and then it filters the table where type = '1' and B menu button filters the table by type = '2' and C menu button filters the table by type =' "."
  
  How can I filter the table without entering the query?
  
  Could someone point me to a solution please.
  
  Thank you.
  11.1.5 jdev
  
  Published by: 893364 on October 26, 2011 12:15
  
  Published by: 893364 on October 26, 2011 12:21

  Hello

  When you have created the table, have you tried selecting the option "filter". Select the table, and access the property of m.. In the toolbar of the Properties Inspector, there is an icon to change the configuration. His fields of filter adding filter for the user to search in.

  Option 2: Data from the Web Service are actually held in iterators. If you want to filter the Web service request, I wouldn't use the WS domain controller but a proxy of JAX - WS in a POJO to recover data from the WS. Then the data control created from the POJO. You might have a method exposed on the POJO which allows you to filter the data internally that is held

  Frank

• where clause to query the hierarchy in the tree Apex area does not

  Hi all

  I am building a tree Menu in Apex 5.0.3 (Oracle 11 g XE), when using when the clause, it does show all the data, but without him, showing all the data.

  I'm trying to populate Tree Menu with data specific to a user successfully logged on.

  (A) table created as HR2. TREE_MENU

  menu_name varchar2 (50).

  number of menu_parent

  number of menu_child

  menu_id varchar2 (12),

  menu_path varchar2 (100),

  number of user_no

  (B) SQL statement for the tree in the Apex region

  Select case when connect_by_isleaf = 1 then 0

  When level = 1 then 1

  else                           -1

  end the status,

  level,

  'Menu_name' as the title,

  NULL as an icon,

  "MENU_CHILD" as a value.

  NULL as ToolTip,

  NULL as link

  to HR2. "" TREE_MENU ".

  -WHERE USER_NO =: P_USERNO

  Start with 'MENU_CHILD' is null

  connect prior "MENU_PARENT" = "MENU_CHILD."

  brothers and sisters of order by 'MENU_ID '.

  Note: also used static value where clause but is not workd.

  that the mistake of me or something else? When using the wizard, she asks (possibly) where clause, this means that when the clause can be used in the SQL statement.

  Help, please.

  Kind regards.

  If you want to prune your tree to show only the elements of the No. 7 usermenu, copy the following code helps you

  select case when connect_by_isleaf = 1 then 0
              when level = 1             then 1
              else                           -1
         end as status,
         level,
         "MENU_NAME" as title,
         null as icon,
         "MENU_CHILD" as value,
         null as tooltip,
         null as link
  from HR2."TREE_MENU"
  start with "MENU_CHILD" is null
  connect by
      prior "MENU_PARENT" = "MENU_CHILD"
      and "USER_NO" = 7
  order siblings by "MENU_ID"
  

  Concerning

  Mahmoud