Question of Access-list PIX
The following access list works on a cisco router, however, the list will not work on the PIX (I change the mask to wildcards to a for the PIX subnet mask).
Router (works)
access allowed test tcp 192.168.1.50 list 0.0.0.5 host 10.10.10.1 eq 80
PIX (does not work)
access list permit test tcp 192.168.1.50 0.0.0.10 host 10.10.10.1 eq 80
I get the error on the PIX:
ERROR: Source, mask <192.168.1.50, 0.0.0.10="">address not pair
Is it possible to group IP addresses as well as on the PIX in a similar way as Cisco IOS?
Thank you!
Domo Arigato!
You can use
192.168.1.48 255.255.255.248 for the source or if they are many hosts you must insert an individual entry for each source.
Of course you can refuse the host 192.168.1.49 and
Let the others allow 192.168.1.48 255.255.255.248
192.168.1.50,>
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
Question of access list for Cisco 1710 performing the 3DES VPN tunnel
I have a question about the use of access lists in the configuration of a router Cisco 1710 that uses access lists to control traffic through the VPN tunnel.
For example the following lines in a configuration on the remote router. My question is whether or not the traffic that matches the definition of list access-130 (something other than 192.168.100.0/24), cross the VPN tunnel or go directly to the Ethernet0 interface.
My understanding is that traffic that matches the access list 120 would be encrypted and sent through the IPSec tunnel. If there was "ban" set out in the statements of 120 access-list, the traffic for those would be sent through the IPSec tunnel but not encrypted (if possible). And finally, given that the definition of crypto card reference only "adapt to 120", any traffic that matches 130 access list would be sent Ethernet0 but not associated with the card encryption and thus not sent through the IPSec tunnel. "
Any input or assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Map Test 11 ipsec-isakmp crypto
..
match address 120
Interface Ethernet0
..
card crypto Test
IP nat inside source overload map route sheep interface Ethernet0
access-list 120 allow ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 130 refuse ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 130 allow ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 any
sheep allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 130
He would go through the interface e0 to the Internet in clear text without going above the tunnel
Jean Marc
-
Simple Question SSH Access-List
I am allowing SSH access for all of our Cisco devices and you want to restrict access to all the following ip addresses: 192.168.200.1 - 192.168.200.50. I forgot the exact configuration of access list to achieve this. The subnet is 24 and I don't want the whole subnet - seulement.1-. 50.
Thank you
Thomas Reiling
Hello
If you use ssh, make sure that you have a domain name, host name and a rsa key is generated. Assuing you have done this, the command vty ACL and following line will do the trick. Note that the host 1-50 list is not on a subnet barrier.
To get it exactly
access-list 1 remark MANAGEMENT ALLOW
access-list 1 permit 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.31access-list 1 permit 192.168.200.32 0.0.0.15
access-list 1 permit 192.168.200.48 0.0.0.1
host access-list 1 192.168.200.50
access-list 1 refuse any newspaper
It would be a good idea to put it on a limit, however, so the following would be much simpler and easier to read.
access-list 1 remark MANAGEMENT ALLOW
access-list 1 permit 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.63access-list 1 refuse any newspaper
Apply the class of access on the vty lines and authentication, I would put something there too.
line vty 0 4
access-class 1
entry ssh transportpassword Bonneau
That should do it.
Good luck!
Brad
-
PIX 501 ICMP access list Question
According to the book, I have the pix and firewall that I know of dealing with routers and switches access lists define what traffic is allowed outside the network. With pix access lists can only be applied one way, to the interface they enter, not leaving. It's my understanding, but when I do an ICMP command:
PIX1 (config) # access - list ethernet1 permit icmp any any echo response
PIX1 (config) # access - list icmp permitted ethernet1 everything all inaccessible
Access-group ethernet1 PIX1 (config) # interface inside
This does not work, but if I apply the access group to the external interface it works. I understand why it is like that.
Thank you
This works because the pix is not aware of session state for the way icmp traffic that it does for tcp and udp.
By default, less access to a high to an interface is allowed, unless you have an acl applies to the interface of higer - then only what the acl permits will be allowed. So you can send outbound icmp echo request. However, for the response to be returned, you must allow that explicitly in an acl that is applied on the external interface, because the pix won't allow any outside traffic by default.
Even for icmp unreachable, although I want to put in custody to be part of the config. Allow only the unattainable due to the ttl expired to facilitate detection of mtu path, not all unachievable.
Let me know if it helps.
-
Hello
We have a Cisco PIX 535. By default, traffic on one more secure interface with a lower security level is allowed, what is?
OK, I have a doubt, I had to define an access list entry to allow a telnet connection between inside and outside. There is no rule against that traffic, but without this rule the telnet connection cannot be established.
And my question is: why? It is not supposed to be allowed by default?
Thanks in advance.
Higher default-> bottom is allowed... However, once you add instructions permit, it is implicitly deny all at the end. So, if you allow ftp and ssl web... so by default, any other traffic is denied and you need to be precise with your permit.
-
Access list ID # on a PIX firewall
Is anyone know what of the identifier access list on a pix firewall?
Standard IOS = 1-99
Extended IOS is 100-199.
SW = PIX?
There is no "limit" by Word to say in the Pix. These limits are in IOS because they define what 'type' of acl, it's IE APPLETALK, IPX, IP etc etc. Pix IP is therefore not necessary for this type of identification.
access-list 100000000000000; 1 items
allow line of the access list 1 100000000000000 ip any a (hitcnt = 0)
Jason
-
How PIX cross access lists?
I'm new with PIX.
I would like to know how this fw through access lists. I mean, it's in what order it checks the rules. I guess it can be quite an important issue if you want to keep performance with more than 400 rules and a flow of traffic.
I thank the of for any comment.
Hello
the pix treats the ACL from top to bottom. Put the rules used most frequently at the top. After a match, the pix stop processing the ACL.
Kind regards
Tom
-
I am facing convert statements leads on our PIX 520 access lists. Is there a better way to do this will be as little as possible traffic interruption? For example, to create access lists and then remove the conduit, or vice versa?
Second, is there a priority recommended in order to access list?
Hello
This is a very good paper on the conversion of lines to the ACL, also when writing ACL always have your most important ACL on top of the ACL work from the top down. When you make changes to the ACL or static lines always issue the command clear xlate and save with RAM command.
http://www.giac.org/practical/GSEC/Bill_Donaldson_GSEC.pdf - by Bill Donaldson, GSEC.
If you want more information/inf, then let me know.
Thank you / Jay.
-
How can I clear counters access-list on a pix firewall
How can I erase the hitcounts on an on a pix firewall access list without resetting the pix?
It would be clear access-list on a router counters.
Thanks in advance
Steve
access list counters Clear
-
Cisco ASA tunnel access list question
We have created a site to IPSec tunnel. Initially, only two IP address were allowed access to the tunnel. They ask now addresses. My question is, if I use access-list extended inside_access_in permit ip any host 10.60.55.10, I also have to make a statement of NAT that allows this?
And when we change the VPN Site to Site connection profile, I have to allow all through this tunnel as well, correct?
I thank you and I hope this makes sense. We were originally political thought based routing on the nearest core of the source.
Dwane
Hi Sylvie,.
If you use NAT so I say yes you must consider from... Normally, in a private LAN on L2L scenario, you might have used no. - NAT... If you have LAN identical at both ends, then you might have using a NAT to a diff of subnets at both ends... If you use the NAT public IP then it will be on the public IP based L2L address... So it depends on your current configuration.
If you use one to 10.60.55.10 (then your site any subnet which flows through the VPN Firewall to 10.60.55.10 is allowed... here you may need to modify NAT as a source...)
But the problem comes from the other end... for them the source will be 10.60.55.10 and destination would... then all traffic from host 10.60.55.10 is taken through the tunnel...
So instead of making a statement as any visit its respective great nets 172.16.0/16 for example...
Concerning
Knockaert
-
I know it must be simple, however, I have some difficulty doing that work. I use version 5.3
I'm trying to block access to the internet at 172.16.39.X. whatever it is on this network should NOT be able to access the internet.
I use the list of access and access - group commands but I must have some syntax errors or something as there doesn't seem to be blocking access. Could someone provide a concrete syntax for this address with 255.255.255.0 subnet so I can see if perhaps I simply make a mistake in the entry. I am new to PIX so I wouldn't be really surprised.
Thank you
Dave
You can do this in several ways:
1. you can exclude this your NAT range. This will not allow this range out to the internet.
2. on your inside interface, apply this rule:
insideACL list access deny ip 172.16.39.0 255.255.255.0 any
insideACL ip access list allow a whole
I hope this helps.
-
I have a hand router Cisco 871 and 5 remote sites using the Cisco 850. The tunnel comes up fine and can ping back from the 850 to the 871. However, I think that I have a problem of access list because I can't open the main database which is on the main site of any of the 5 locations nor do I get on the internet that the proxy server get no not at other sites. I can ping these remote sites, but cannot use them in fact. These rules are very different, and then the PIX.
192.168.1x
* THE REMOTE SITE
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
not run cdp
sheep allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 101
192.168.0.X
HAND ROUTER
recording of debug trap
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 103 allow ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 104. allow ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255
not run cdp
sheep allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 101
!
IP tcp mss<68-10000>
Hope this helps,
Gilbert
68-10000> -
New to pix, need help with "debug access list of all the" command
I have a pix 515 v6.3. I am tring to use then "debug access list of all the" command to see what traffic is stopped by my access list. However, I don't get any output. I turn execution of the command, but nothing happens. Other debug commands give the console. Perhaps, I do not understand what "debug to access list of all the" is used for. Any help that can be provided would be greatly appreciated.
Tim
Also try following the commands of logging
LOGG on
LOGG buff 7
term Lun
M.
-
I have the access-list applied on my "external" my PIX interface and I'm trying to make it so pings coming from the 'inside' book, but those who come of the? outside? in case of failure.
access-list outside permit icmp any any echo response
list a whole outside access allowed icmp time-exceeded
access outside allowed icmp list everything all inaccessible
Using a VPN, you can create a rule/filter and apply it to the tunnel which verifies the established bit to be set. Is it possible to do this with a list of access a PIX?
I have a 6.3 (5) PIX 501
If you add (in config mode)
ICMP deny everything outside
The above will disable any ping/trace route or network scans of the internet (that is, your network will be in stealth mode), if you also add
access-list outside permit icmp any any echo response
list a whole outside access allowed icmp time-exceeded
access outside allowed icmp list everything all inaccessible
outside access-group in external interface
This will then allow icmp traffic going out to the internet, BUT don't be do not allow anyone to ping/trace route internet or analyze your network!
You can test this by visiting http://www.grc.com and using the program "shields up" to analyze your network. Try first without icmp deny out of any instruction and then with the statement added to your configuration.
Hope this helps
Jay
-
PIX Firewall 525 access list problem
Hello.
I have the following problem. After insertion of an access list, despite seeing the packages associated with the list, they do not "match", that is, it is as if the list wasn't doing his job.
Who can be the cause of this behavior?
PIX 525 model
IOS 6.3 (4)
Thank you.
Marulanda Ramiro Z.
Are all of syslogs sent properly to the remote host? If so, I would say that the udp connection is never closed by the PIX. Let's say that the connection never hit the timeout in the pix config. If the connection remains open and doesnot increments the hit count for your access list. I have a PIX that makes the same behavior.
The increase in the number of accesses is also based on the connection and not on each packet passing through the PIX.
You can use a debug command to see the packets through the PIX.
HTH
Mike
Maybe you are looking for
-
Noisy cooling on Satellite A300 module
I bought myself a Satellite A300-1mc and I wondered how noisy, they should be.My old (first) Toshiba laptop A100-147 (xp) cooling system was so quiet.Could hardly hear a thing but as soon as Vista starts on Sat A300 it becomes noisy. Then after a few
-
XML report shows the parameters instead of the name of the variable
I would like to than the actual variable name to be included in the report XML rather than the "settings." I tried many things to get there without success. Any ideas?
-
My xbox does not recognize my hard drive, but my pc detect in Device Manager.
Well one day I had the prototype 2 for my Xbox I played it for a while then I turned it off to get something to eat and when I turned it back on this subject came up with sign in screen with no profile and when I went to the storage screen I had no s
-
Is there a way to upgrade Vista to windows 7 or 8?
Original title: older computers upgrade I have a really nice hp tower top that is configured for multimedia and I noticed after walking and part support for vista is over or soon will be. I have several computers and one with 10 windows, but I'm not
-
New monitor displays an Error Message "Signal out of range" when computer starts
Installed new ASUS VS24H-P control on my computer and I get this image of "out of range" bouncing around the corners of the screen.