R7000 firmware version 1.0.5.64_1.1.88 released today

Similar Questions

• Nighthawk R7000 Firmware Version V1.0.6.28_1.1.83 adds a new network called NETGEAR41-arlo_246912

  I just upgarded my R7000 for the latest firmware of the device itself. Now, I have an additional network that matches my real network called NETGEAR41-arlo_246912. I tried to switch my camera on another channel, and he followed. He got the exact same force that my wifi. The net effect is that I have 2 signals on channel and my coverage and bandwidth has suffered.

  Anyone know what it is and how to turn off?

  OK, found a similar bug by someone else with a solution:

  https://community.NETGEAR.com/T5/Nighthawk-WiFi-routers/r7000-firmware-version-1-0-6-28-strange-3rd-...

  Basically, they have added a feature and it enabled by default. It is in the STANDARD settings and no ADVANCED setting. Disable the arlo. Ugh.

• R7000 - change of firmware version

  I already had firmware version: V1.0.6.28_1.1.83 installed, but now find the newest website is Firmware Version V1.0.4.30_1.1.67. Why the most recent version is down? I would like to re - download version V1.0.6.28_1.1.83

  Thank you

• Calculator chart 50g. How can I find my firmware version? Thank you, johnnaben

  How can I find my firmware version?

  Thank you

  johnnaben

  I thank very much - the two methods have worked

  johnnaben

• Site WEB BLOCKED on WRT54G V6 (Firmware Version: v1.02.8)

  Hello friends,

  In short: why block some Web pages and others do not use this feature in my router?  As mentioned above, I run a small office and uses one: WRT54G V6 (Firmware Version: v1.02.8): router.

  For example, I managed to block sites like 'sex.com' and others.  Also, blocking sites by keywords such as: News, music, vid, naked, etc.  BUT, when I try to block FACEBOOK or TWITTER or by URL or keyword, guess what: IT DOES NOT WORK...!

  No idea why this is happening and how can I be successful in the configuration of this feature?  I'd appreciate that!  Blessings...

  Just to let you know two things:

  1. I contacted Linksys live chat and they confirmed Web sites I want blocked using the protocol https, thye can not be blocked because the router features

  2. as mentioned before, I warned an account with DynDNS as you suggest, followed their instructions, and after 24 hours or more, the protection is active...! Now no one in my little office is losing work time to monitor their FB status or send tweets!   In addition, because my office is on the first floor of my house, I have peace of mind because I can block different sites using their "protection plans" categories: sport, games, porn, social media, blogs, videos, etc.   I love...!  I would recommend this service to anyone

  Thank you

• Access Point WRT1900AC & Firmware version: 1.1.10.167514, it cannot be accessed the config page.

  Hello!

  I am a new user of router dual-band WRT1900AC . The installation has been updated instantly to
  Firmware version: 1.1.10.167514
  Release date: June 30, 2015

  My WRT1900AC is configured as a wireless gateway.

  https://community.Linksys.com/T5/wireless-routers/WRT1900AC-as-wireless-access-point/TD-p/847286

  Also, I have disabled firewall and uPnP.
  A tutorial here:

  http://www.Linksys.com/us/support-article?articleNum=140371

  Everything works except that without access to the router config page.

  The problem is, I can't access my page to config WRT1900AC Wireless Access Point and the only solution is to connect temporary exit HAND ROUTER LAN to WAN WRT1900AC, can I access my AP

  (after restart of course). Change after I return the cable to the LAN again and restart WRT1900AC. This works.

  Yesterday, I spoke with live chat. I received recommendations:
  "Once the router is configured to bridge fashion, page configuration accessible only using its new IP address. The new IP address can be found on the main router DHCP table. It is because only in LAN - LAN, the

  WRT1900AC will be his disabled DHCP. »

  I also saw Table of customer routers main DHCP but I have not found the IP address of my wireless WRT1900AC Access Point there. I think it is a bug in the version of the Firmware: 1.1.10.167514
  Page config in the case of WRT1900AC Wireless Access Point is isolated or possible only thanks to the WAN WRT1900AC. It would be nice if someone confirms that and maybe in the next version of

  fix. :-) I have a beautiful smartphone App "Smart Wi - Fi" and I can not comfortably use it due to this error/bug.
  Otherwise everything works well and stably.

  inspire wrote:

  Hi chadster766!

  Thanks for your suggestion and a quick response. I have a feeling it would work then as you described. But how to set Internet settings in mode Bridge? I've already put a static IP address router IP address WRT1900AC. I see it with IP scanner.
  If I leave the cables as you suggest (hand router LAN to WAN WRT1900AC), the Internet does not work. In this case go to the config page, but Internet with other devices will not work. Also good Wifi, it works but can not access. How to set the Bridge Mode? (I think this is my problem in this scenario)

  IP address of the router (LAN):

  Connectivity-online-online details router LAN => Edit

  * If your main router IP subnet example is 192.168.0.x, then set the address of the WRT1900AC IP to an IP outside the range of the main router DHCP. Ex: 192.168.0.2

  Bridge mode:
  Connectivity-online Internet-online IPv4 settings => Edit-online Bridge Mode

• WRT54G Firmware Version: update v7.00.7 Beta?

  Hello

  I have a router wireless EMEA WRT54G v7 with Firmware Version: v7.00.7 Beta. I can't find an update of the firmware on the site.

  Can you please help?

  Thank you

  Firmware update is available. Version 7.00.8 is available on the EMEA website. Click here!

  It is enough to click on "Downloads" and select the correct hardware version.

• How do I know the hardware version WRT54G to only the firmware version and date

  Hi - on a Linksys WRT54G, serial numbers and the version number have
  been worn except in the case of the unit, so I don't know what version it is. He has since been released in it's 'safe place' to which I don't have physical access (and yet they want me to admin it). Don't think that I even get cable connect, wireless only. Gee. In any case... of the configuration screens I see:

  The current version of the firmware is 1.00.6 January 20, 2006.
  I could, I guess that to get the MAC address

  The default login and password are what is active.

  Can you tell what version of the material is, so that I can download the
  good firmware flash update?
  Thank you

  The best way is to check the hardware, but as you mentioned, it is not an option. I suggest that you check each firmware release notes, check the previous firmware versions and dates on each version of the output material. However, it may be tedious.

• WRT54G (version 2) Firmware Version Question

  Hello

  Beautiful room here. I'm glad that this facility exists.

  I have the router WRT54G version 2. Finally, I upgraded the version of firmware years before Cisco Linksys bought.

  A recent announcement by the people of Black Hat (treaties in this article of TechSpot) about their intention to publish a validation tool to exploit a vulnerability of DNS rebinding on a great many routers SOHO forced me to check for the latest update of firmware for my router.

  The interesting thing is that my router's Web interface lists the current version of the firmware as 4.30.12, but the latest version of the downloadable firmware that I see listed on the support site is 4.21.1. I'm not very surprised by this apparent anomaly. If I remember correctly, that firmware version 4.30.12 download is a beta that was supposed to fix a problem connecting WiFi to a certain type. If this version of the firmware was still considered a beta at the time of the acquisition of Linksys by Cisco - or a 'stable' later firmware version incorporating the same or better fixes for the issues addressed by 4.30.12 that had been produced at that time-so maybe 4.30.12 was ruled out.

  If you read the article of TechSpot and the associated table of preliminary vulnerability, test reports, you'll see that router WRT54G version 2 is not specifically listed. Version 3 of the router is listed as vulnerable, and version 5 of the router is not.

  So, my questions are:

  Everyone here is aware of information indicating whether or not the problem of DNS Rebinding vulnerability affects the WRT54G version 2 with the last registered (4.21.1) router firmware version?

  If so, does anyone know if yes or no Cisco plans to release an update for this old router?

  If the router is vulnerable and will not be solved with a firmware update I'll probably have myself a new LInksys router which is not listed as vulnerable. (Believe me, I'm not leaving this thread to bash Linksys. This router ran like a train of 24 hours a day for years without a single hiccup that was not directly attributable to the problems of the ISP. For the price, it's one of the best purchases of equipment I've ever done calculation. And I have done this since the beginning of the 80s when I was using a CP/M system and an Apple / / e.)

  If the 4.21.1 version firmware for WRT54G version 2 is not affected, I wonder if anyone knows if yes or no 'downgrading' of 4.30.12 to 4.21.1 is likely to lead to a failure of the router. (I'll probably try it anyway. If it brick the router I'll just go ahead and get a new one.)

  BTW, I use this router with the ease of remote administration and UPnP off and strong admin password that is changed each week. (When I always used wireless I used WPA2 AES with strong password, but I am all wired now with the systems running Debian testing).

  Forgive me for talking to myself. I decided to just go ahead and "downgrade" of the 4.30.12 firmware 4.21.1 version - just because I prefer to use a version of firmware known and supported for this material. The downgrade has gone well, so no worries about this.

  I'll look for news on whether or not this version of the firmware on this particular router is vulnerable to the flaw in DNS rebinding and acts accordingly.

  Sorry for the noise.

• PS6100 with firmware version 7.0.5 + Oracle Linux 5.10 + multipathd question

  I try to use the multipath regular linux (device-map-multipath) with my PS6100 and it doesn't quite work. It gives me "readsector0 Auditor reports path is down," "pdu (op 0 x 50000370 itt 0x1) rejected.» Code 0 x 4 reason"errors and my iSCSI connections are reset every few seconds. My OS is Oracle Linux 5.10 (fully updated) and my PS6100 is running with the latest firmware version 7.0.5.

  The latest kit from Dell STRUCK for Linux, 1.3.0-2, works fine on this machine, but the reason why I'm putting multipathd is to compare the performance between the two solution. If we look at the other system we have that run the ordinary multipathd, paths of Dell could give us performance. We doubt it, but we want to do the tests and a comparison of its performance stats.

  We have another server which has almost the same configuration (same OS connected to an another PS6100) and multipathd works well on this one. And one of the difference between this system and no work is that the PS6100 is running on firmware 5.2.5 instead of 7.0.5. I'd be willing to downgrade firmware (this unit is not yet in production, and I don't mind losing the data on it) but I'm not find anything on the internet that show how other that of the "call from Dell and it'll do it for you. If the only thing you need to do is a special command in the CLI then why there is no documentation on this subject?

  So I wonder if anyone here runs a firmware equallogic 7.0.5 with the multipathd of linux and a RedHat 5 of operating system (Oracle Linux, Redhat, CentOS, etc.)?

  Hello

  It is documented in the release notes for the firmware 7.0.x.  There is a bug in Multipathd, which is exposed with 7.0.x. firmware.   Replace readsector0 TUR or ARM and restart multipathd.  Protocol errors will stop and Linux MPIO works perfectly.

  Kind regards

• RAID Controller degraded by the Firmware version

  Hi all

  My security system is sending me alert because my RAID controllers being day. RAID controllers are fine, but the State is deteriorating because of the "latest Firmware Version available" which means I can't properly control if something really bad happens.

  Is it possible to disable the alert or lower the minimum version expected? I just can't reboot all my servers just for an update of the RAID firmware.

  My security system expects a status: Ok

  Thank you very much in advance!

  Greg

  Below the output omreport:

  omreport storage controller $
  Controller PERC H700 integrated (Embedded)

  Controllers of
  ID                                            : 0
  Status: No reviews
  Name: PERC H700 integrated
  Location ID: shipped
  State: degraded
  Firmware version: 12.10.1 - 0001
  Latest Version of the Firmware available: 12.10.4 - 0001
  Driver version: 00.00.06.14 - kh1
  The minimum required driver version: not Applicable
  The Storport driver version: not Applicable
  Minimum required: Version of the Storport driver: not Applicable
  Number of connectors: 2
  Regeneration rate: 30%
  BGI Rate                                      : 30%
  Consistency check rate: 30%
  Rebuild rate: 30%
  Alarm status: not applicable
  Cluster mode: not Applicable
  SCSI initiator ID: not Applicable
  Cache memory size: 512 MB
  Patrol read mode: manual
  Patrol read status: stopped
  Patrol read rate: 30%
  Read the iterations of patrol: 2
  Give up control of consistency error: disabled
  Enable reversible hot spare and replace the: enabled
  Load Balancing: not Applicable
  Auto Member Replace on Predictive Failure: disabled
  Redundant path view: not Applicable
  Able CacheCade: Non Applicable
  Persistent backup: disabled
  Encryption Capable: Yes
  Currently key encryption: No.
  Encryption mode: no
  Preserved cache: No.
  Spin down drives unconfigured: disabled
  Turn down hot spares: disabled
  Centrifuge the configured drives: not Applicable
  Automatic disk Power Saving (idle C): not Applicable

  Thanks again!

  gcharot

  Is it possible to update the firmware without system reboot? I am running CentOS 5 and 6

  No, you can update the firmware without a reboot, but the update will be based in the controller cache until a reset is performed. So yes, you can perform the update without reboot, but it will not take effect until you perform a reboot.

  Thank you

• How to get the driver network card and on the use of the PowerCLI firmware version?

  Hi all

  I would like to know if anyone can help me in sharing the PowerCLI script to list the server NETWORK card driver and the firmware version?

  Note: I use the HP Blade Server and it's manual ESX - CLI command output:

  	HP BL 465c G8
  	~ # ethtool-i vmnic0
  	pilot: be2net
  	version: 10.5.65.4
  	firmware version: 10.2.340.19
  	bus-info: 0000:04:00.0

  	HP BL 465c G7
  	~ # ethtool-i vmnic0
  	pilot: be2net
  	version: 10.2.293.0
  	firmware version: 4.9.416.7
  	bus-info: 0000:04:00.0

  Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you.

  PowerCLI Version

  ----------------

  VMware vSphere PowerCLI 6.0 Release 2 build 3056836

  ---------------

  Component versions

  ---------------

  VMWare AutoDeploy PowerCLI component 6.0 build 2358282

  VMWare ImageBuilder PowerCLI component 6.0 build 2358282

  VMware vSphere PowerCLI component 6.0 build 3052101

  It works for you?

  $esxName = "MyEsx".

  $esxcli = get-EsxCli - VMHost $esxName

  $esxcli.network.nic.list () | %{

  $esxcli.network.nic.get ($_.) Name) |

  Select Name,

  @{N = "Driver"; E={$_. DriverInfo.Driver}},

  @{N = 'Version'; E={$_. DriverInfo.Version}},

  @{N = 'Firmware Version'; E={$_. DriverInfo.FirmwareVersion}}

  }

• Need help with changing PowerCLI script to get the interface driver NETWORK & firmware version?

  Hi all

  mattboren created the script below for a list of BIOS hardware version and firmware version:

  ## Script function: quickly get BIOS date, Smart Array FW version, and iLO FW version for HP hosts in a given location (folder, cluster, datacenter, etc.)
  ## Author: vNugglets.com -- Sep 2011
  
  ## folder in which hosts in which we are interested reside
  #$strHostsFolderName = "myFolder"
  #Get-View -ViewType HostSystem -Property Name, Runtime.HealthSystemRuntime.SystemHealthInfo.NumericSensorInfo -SearchRoot (Get-View -ViewType Folder -Property Name -Filter @{"Name" = "^$([RegEx]::escape($strHostsFolderName))$"}).MoRef | %{
  ## cluster in which hosts in which we are interested reside
  
  $strHostsClusterName = "Production"
  Get-View -ViewType HostSystem -Property Name, Runtime.HealthSystemRuntime.SystemHealthInfo.NumericSensorInfo -SearchRoot (Get-View -ViewType ClusterComputeResource -Property Name -Filter @{"Name" = "^$([RegEx]::escape($strHostsClusterName))$"}).MoRef | %{
      $arrNumericSensorInfo = @($_.Runtime.HealthSystemRuntime.SystemHealthInfo.NumericSensorInfo)
      # HostNumericSensorInfo for BIOS, iLO, array controller
      $nsiBIOS = $arrNumericSensorInfo | ? {$_.Name -like "*System BIOS*"}
      $nsiArrayCtrlr = $arrNumericSensorInfo | ? {$_.Name -like "HP Smart Array Controller*"}
      $nsiILO = $arrNumericSensorInfo | ? {$_.Name -like "Hewlett-Packard BMC Firmware*"}
      $nsiNXdev = $arrNumericSensorInfo | ? {$_.Name -like "nx_nic device*"}
      $nsiNXdrv = $arrNumericSensorInfo | ? {$_.Name -like "nx_nic driver*"}
  
    if ( $nsiNXdev.Count -gt 0 ) {
         $nsiNXdevice = $nsiNXdev[0].Name
    } else {
         $nsiNXdevice = "n/a"
    }
    if ( $nsiNXdrv.Count -gt 0 ) {
         $nsiNXdriver = $nsiNXdrv[0].Name
    } else {
         $nsiNXdriver = "n/a"
    }
  
      New-Object PSObject -Property @{
          VMHost = $_.Name
          "SystemBIOS" = $nsiBIOS.name
          "HPSmartArray" = $nsiArrayCtrlr.Name
          "iLOFirmware" = $nsiILO.Name
          "nx_nic device" = $nsiNXdevice
          "nx_nic driver" = $nsiNXdriver
      } ## end new-object
  } | Export-Csv C:\temp\Production-BLadeG7.csv  ## end Foreach-Object
  
  
  
  
  

  However, I would like to change the driver for the CARD and the version of the firmware but still appear.

  Any kind of help and suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you.

  Try like this

  $strHostsClusterName = 'production '.

  Get-view ViewType - HostSystem-Property Name, Runtime.HealthSystemRuntime.SystemHealthInfo.NumericSensorInfo - SearchRoot (Get-View - Name ClusterComputeResource-property - ViewType filter @{'Name' = ' ^ $([RegEx]: escape ($strHostsClusterName)) $"" "}). MoRef | %{

  $arrNumericSensorInfo = @($_.) Runtime.HealthSystemRuntime.SystemHealthInfo.NumericSensorInfo)

  # HostNumericSensorInfo for controller table of BIOS, ILO,

  $nsiBIOS = $arrNumericSensorInfo |? {$_. {Name: like "* system BIOS *"}

  $nsiArrayCtrlr = $arrNumericSensorInfo |? {$_. {Name - like "HP Smart Array Controller *"}

  $nsiILO = $arrNumericSensorInfo |? {$_. {Name - like "Hewlett-Packard BMC Firmware *"}

  $esxName = $_. Name

  $esxcli = get-EsxCli - VMHost $_. Name

  $esxcli.network.nic.list () | %{

  $esxcli.network.nic.get ($_.) Name) | %{

  $props [ordered] = @ {}

  VMHost = $esxName

  "SystemBIOS" = $nsiBIOS.name

  "HPSmartArray" = $nsiArrayCtrlr.Name

  "iLOFirmware" = $nsiILO.Name

  "nx_nic device" = $_. Name

  'nx_nic pilot' = $_. DriverInfo.Driver

  "nx_nic driver version" = $_. DriverInfo.Version

  "nx_nic firmware version" = $_. DriverInfo.FirmwareVersion

  } # end new object

  New-object PSObject-property $props

  }

  }

  } | Export-Csv C:\temp\Production-BLadeG7.csv # end Foreach-Object

• R7000 Nighthawk Firmware Version V1.0.6.28_1.1.83

  Running the FW indicated in the title. What version should I run for performance and stability?

  @Bdad We have released a new official firmware 1.0.5.64. See this link for the release notes.

  This should also fix issues of 2.4 GHz. Feel free to update, redefinition and reconfigure. Provide us with details if you encounter problems.

• New firmware Version 4

  All,

  Please see the table below for version 4 of the F65 firmware, in the coming days we will provide you the details and the firmware

  Concerning

  Peter

  

  I installed 4.01, I think you should contact your Sony representative.

  The best

  brand