RADIUS authentication does not

Similar Questions

• RADIUS authorization does not not for Nortel by ACS 5.3 switches

  Hello

  RADIUS authorization does not work on the Nortel switches, I configured the access policies relevant for the attributes RADIUS (attached screenshot)

  Order get not executed due to the failure of authorization:

  config cli password rwa

  I do not see RADIUS authorization reports option, just to check if someone has understood how to set up these reports?

  I made a capture of packages for packages of AAA of the nortel switch and found that the accounting request contains the cli command sent for authorization. (pcap file attached)

  Kind regards

  Akhtar

  Akhtar,

  This isn't how the authorization of RADIUS. Accept access and the av-pairs that are sent in the response is the permission for the session of the user. This isn't like Ganymede where each command is permitted with an authentication request separate with the command that the client is running.

  When it comes to radius account management isn't too late in the process.

  Thank you

  Tarik admani

• RADIUS authentic works not 3560

  Hello world.

  The switch's config for RADIUS authentic.

  When I try here is the log

  % SSH-SSH2_USERAUTH 5: 'xy' authentication SSH2 Session 192.168.x.x (ATS = 1) using crypto cipher "aes256-cbc" hmac "hmac-sha1' Failed

  What should I check now

  Concerning

  Mahesh

  You must post a few outings until I'd suggest something. If SSH works very well with the local database which means the keys RSA are fine.

  If you can't attach the executed full show. Attach the bottom of the outputs listed in your next reply.

  See the race | in aaa

  See the race | Please line vty 0 4

  Debug RADIUS

  Debug aaa authentic

  Debug aaa approval

  The radius, if any server error.

  ~ BR
  Jatin kone

  * Does the rate of useful messages *.

• Operating system authentication does not not in SQL Developer 4.0.1.14

  I just tried to upgrade from the 4.0.0.12 version of the a 4.0.1.14 new and that doing so broke the OS authentication. I checked the settings and 'use Oracle Client' and 'use driver OIC/thickness' are both enabled, the correct paths.

  Launch of the previous version instead, the exact same connection works fine.

  I use the 11 GR 2 11.2.0.3 x 86 Windows 7 client, in a field. Two versions of the SQL Developer seem to be running in x 86 mode, so they should be able to use the Oracle client.

  I managed to make it work. It turned out that when I left my settings to import from the previous version, it does not seem that is imported correctly. It showed as active for the pilot of the OIC, but it was not in reality.

  So I had to disable (and restart), then turn it back on (and restart). After that, it worked fine.

• NAC appliance local authentication does not

  Hello

  I try a test for the NAC scenario. It's the gateway virtual oob

  I get the login page when trying to access the web, but when I try to authenticate to the local db that I get an error message and I am on the authentication screen.

  I listened with tcpdump on both interfaces. on the unreliable side, I see traffic but on the side confidence no difference in traffic doesn't appear (but maybe that's normal)

  can someone please help with detailed steps that follows authentication

  not only host--> nas--> nam (localdb)

  or some ideas

  Thank you!

  check the teporary certificates that you generated and set the field of domain name FULL to the nas ip address and so the nam

• HTTP GET with authentication does not work in Adobe Indesign javascript

  Hello

  This is the code I am trying to run in the Indesign script. The URL http://localhost:4502/content/geometrixx/en/company/news/articles.html works directly in a browser, it renders the content. But when I try running the below in Indesign, it gives the following result. It does not really give the conent return.

  InDesign script code:

  response = "";

  Conn = new Socket;

  access the Adobe homepage

  If (conn.open ("localhost:4502")) {}

  var request = "GET /content/geometrixx/en/company/news/articles.html HTTP/1.0\n\n ' +.

  "Authorization: basic admin:admin\n"

  Conn.Write (request); and read the response from the server

  response = conn.read (999999);

  Alert (Reply);

  Conn.Close ();

  }

  Output in Indesign:

  HTTP/1.1 404 not found

  Connection: close

  Server: Day-Servlet-Engine/4.1.12

  Content-Type: text/html; Charset = UTF-8

  Content-Length: 387

  Date: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 03:05:26 GMT

  <! DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0 / / BY" > ".

  < html > < head >

  < title > 404 not found < /title >

  < / head > < body >

  Found < H1 > < / h1 >

  < p > the requested URL /content/geometrixx/en/company/news/articles.html was not found on this server. < /p >

  < hr >

  < address > ApacheSling/2.2 (Java hotspot Server VM 64 1.6.0_29;) Mac OS X 10.7.2 x86_64) < / address >

  < body / > < / html >

  Hello

  Your code has problems.

  1 HTTP request closed 1st line. Server wait and get the data so that come from "\n\n".

  2. name and password of the user authorization string must be base64 encoding.

  You can read as a reference:

  http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_access_authentication

  Here's an example query:

  var request = "GET /autharea/index.html HTTP/1.1\n '.

  + "Host: (servername) \n".

  + "Content-Type: text/html;" Charset = UTF - 8\n ".

  + "Authorization: basic" + encodedData + "\n\n";

  and work with function base64 code

  var authStr = "name";

  var encodedData = base64 (authStr);

  var response = "";

  var conn = new Socket;

  var request = "GET /autharea/index.html HTTP/1.1\n '.

  + "Host: (serverName) \n"

  + "Content-Type: text/html;" Charset = UTF - 8\n ".

  + "Authorization: basic" + encodedData + "\n\n";

  If (conn.open ('130.1.6.46:80', 'UTF-8')) {}

  Conn.Write (request);

  response = conn.read (999999);

  Conn.Close ();

  Alert (Reply);

  }

  function base64 (binaryString) {}

  var keyStr = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789 + / =";

  var encoded = "";

  var c1, c2, c3;

  var e1, e2, e3, e4;

  var i = 0;

  While (i< binarystring.length)="">

  C1 = binaryString.charCodeAt(i++);

  C2 is equal to binaryString.charCodeAt(i++);

  C3 = binaryString.charCodeAt(i++);

  E1 = c1 > 2;

  e2 = ((c1 & 3) < 4)="" |="" (c2="">> 4);

  E3 = ((c2 & 15) < 2)="" |="" (c3=""> > 6);

  E4 = c3 & 63;

  If (isNaN (c2)) {}

  E3 = e4 = 64;

  } Else if (isNaN (c3)) {}

  E4 = 64;

  }

  encoded = code + keyStr.charAt (e1) + keyStr.charAt (e2) +.

  keyStr.charAt (e3) + keyStr.charAt (e4);

  }

  return encoded;

  }

  Ten

• WLC Flex connect local authentication does not work

  Hi guys,.

  I'll give you a brief description of our current flexconnect configuration. We have APs configured mode flexconnect in the remote office and in local mode in the local office. Wireless LANs are the same in both locations and we have detected a problem in one specific SSID. It is a voice SSID and configured in 802.1 x mode that authenticates to a RADIUS server in the remote desktop.

  We detected only when the WAN line gets collapsed the IP phones unplugged wireless SSID and when the WAN line become free, reconnected.

  We have seen that we can configure Flexconnect local auth mode to avoid this problem, but it of esn can't work properly. We have set up APs in remote site with an IP address static and configured as NAS in the RADIUS server, but we did not see any which authenticayion in th RADIUS server package when change us the SSID to «FlexConnect auth» local

  Can you give me an idea to help solve this problem?

  Thanks in advance.

  Joel

  I suppose that clients connected by access points Flexconnect have problems where the WAN connection is down (?)

  It depends on your current configuration and security policy what are the feasible options in this scenario. If there is an available RADIUS server - who can still authenticate your users while the WAN line is down, you can configure your access points to access this server directly. You must use a FlexConnect for this group and configure the external server on the general tab, in the menu "AAA". You already made the point of access-static IP addresses and add them as clients on the RADIUS server, then it should work.

  Another option is that in the event of failure, access points to will authenticate the client based on a local data base and/or certificate. Also, this requires a FlexConnect group and the option 'Enable local authentication AP'. For example: If you are using PEAP and a specific user for VoWLAN account you can download the server and the certificates of CA to the WLC and add the credentials of this account to build the same configuration with the external server. Downside of this is the lack of central logging that may not match your security policy.

  Remember that the access point itself can't remember the relationship between the access point and FlexConnect group, in both scenarios, you need to configure all controllers manually with these MAC to the Group mappings. This behavior is different in comparison with the "groups of AP" what access point you remember during the passage of the controllers.

  The "FlexConnect local authentication" option on the SSID itself forces always use local authentication that has been configured on the FlexConnect group even if the connection with the WLC is available. I don't think that it is feasible to use it in your scenario.

  Please rate helpful messages... :-)

• How the process in two steps of authentication does not work if you are not in an area of cellular service

  Outside cellular service areas, IS those who know how the two step aunthicatuon process works in an iPhone 6, using the operating system iOS 9.3.4?  Would a being completely locked out of their iphone and apple services until they could find themselves in a cell service area? Or can it be accessed by a public wifi? Who beg to differ on whether or not it is beneficial to use when you travel?

  I did a little research to see if all Apple items shed light...

  See "How it works" in the Apple ID - Apple Support for two-factor authentication - a time that a device is approved, he'll never ask again unless you perform one or more of several things to "break the connection.

  If I were you, I would spend it TURNED off if you fear that one of these things could happen while you might not be able to obtain the code by SMS

  Frequently asked questions about the audit in two steps for Apple ID - Apple Support

  I'm confused as to why Apple would use two different expressions for what seems to be the same:

  • "Two -authentication"- and
  • "Two -step".

  The above two articles begin with a statement like: [underlining is unique, "BOLD" is synonymous with]

  "Two-factor authentication is just an extra layer of security of your ID Apple aiming to sure you are the only person who can access to your account, even if someone knows your password."

  «The two-step verification is an additional security feature for your Apple which designed to prevent anyone to access or use your account, same ID is they know your password.»

  Maybe someone with more experience can shed some light on your question and MY confusion?

• Cross domain authentication does not?

  Hello community,

  I ran into a problem with authentication and am confused if it's something that in our configuration, or if it is seen elsewhere as well?

  Scenario:
  1. a service account for installation used, who has access to read for the 3 areas in question. The account itself is one of the 3 areas (not sure if this is the origin of the question, but somehow in doubt).

  2. a single tenant with 3 mounting identity, one for each region stores, all configured exactly the same way;

  Question:
  
  

  Users not in the same domain as the systems (which is also the same domain as the service account), cannot connect. There is no error thrown to the logon screen, after a moment of the authentication attempt, the user is with the login screen allowed out again. If I add accounts, which are not members of a handful of groups, they can identify.

  According to the guidelines of VMware, the problem with no authentication is possible that if a user is a member of about 100 nested groups should be solved with update 1, we have applied as well.

  Device name: VMware vCAC device
  Version of the device: 6.0.1.0 build 1569764

  Device name: identity of VMware Appliance
  The unit version: 2.0.1.0 build 1545089

  Thanks for any advice you may have.

  Bij

  Solved this problem by changing the configuration to use only the tenant default and thereby using Native AD authentication. I hope that it might help others who see similar problems.

• Smart card authentication does not

  I am currently configuring a deployment view in our environment.  Installation requires that we use smart cards to connect (Aladdin eToken Pro).  I have the aladdin software installed on the client computer.  When I run the client to view I don't get invited to my PIN and instead get a message indicating that this smart card is required for the connection.

  Smart card for my domain authentication is working because I need a smart card to connect to our current physical machines.

  Has anyone had an experience getting the aladdin etokens to work?

  Thank you

  Casey Shenberger

  It's really weird.  I don't expect this step to get this part working, but I guess stranger things have occurred.

  In general, the answer to your question is to set the GPO of Agent 'AllowSingleSignOn' to false/stop.  Then the SSO will not be attempted in remote desktop.  If, as you say, you don't want users to have access to the smart card reader in the remote desktop connection or for use with applications, the next step depends on the Protocol.  If the end users use PCoIP, then it seems that you do not want to install the Sub-function "PCoIP Smart Card" of the agent Installer and devices will not be redirected.  If end users use RDP, then use one of the client group policy to turn off the smart card redirection.  In my view, there is also a PCoIP GPO to do the same thing (or he respects the GPO of RDP, offhand, I don't remember that one).

• CSS border-radius rule does not work in IE9

  Hi all.

  I wonder if anyone has a CSS border-radius rule to work with release of RoboHelp's WebHelp/WebHelp Pro in IE9?

  I have tried to create a new, empty project and have used some simple built-in CSS (no external CSS is called), namely:

  < style type = "text/css" >

  div {}

  border-radius: 15px;

  background-color: #f00;

  }

  < / style >

  and then, in the <>body, all this:

  < div >

  < p > Hello world. < /p >

  < / div >

  The result is exactly as expected when viewed as Safari, Chrome and Firefox, but IE9 stubbornly refuses to display curved corners on the div. The same code works perfectly in IE9 when I write it in Dreamweaver.

  I thought that I might have met around the problem when I found a site which proposes to add the following code to the head of <>:

  < meta http-equiv = "X-UA-Compatible" content = "IE = 9" / >

  It seemed to work when previewing the theme with the "Show selected item" button (it looks like a pair of glasses), but when the WebHelp output has been generated, the rounded corners were still left in IE9. The same is true when the output with WebHelp Pro.
  So, is the process of release of RoboHelp do something to remove the application of the rule of border-radius in IE9? By specifying values individual border-radius for each side of the div did not help either.
  I use RoboHelp 9.0.1.232.

  Hello

  Just did a quick test and it's certainly a bug in IE9. It seems that when you use frameset, the top frame rendering mode is used for all of the images below. Given that the appearance of WebHelp file still use the game of HTML 4 frames, the IE9 rendering mode is on quicks mode or something.

  Solution: Add the meta tag for IE not only your topics, but all of the htm files mode in your output. Try my rendered IE script tags: http://www.wvanweelden.eu/robohelp/scripts/ierendertags. This will add tags to all htm files in your output. Voila, the boundary curves are now visible in IE9.

  A note: I have no idea what standard mode of IE will be at the table of the contents/index/search/etc. of the WebHelp. I don't know if IE9 is already supported by Adobe so be sure to test your WebHelp.

  Take a bow

  Willam

• NTLM authentication does not work well with Firefox and WebTier (11 GR 2)

  Hello
  We use authentication NTLM with Jason Straubs NTLM - Sentry feature (http://jastraub.blogspot.com/2008/03/ntlm-http-authentication-and.html) Page.
  
  With the old configuration of Apex 3.2 with HTTP-Server Oracle 10 g 2-companion-album, it works fine.
  
  Now install us a Web server with Oracle 11 GR 2 (Oracle Web Tier). I have set up the DADS. CONF in the same way as the old HTTP server. With IE, it works, but with Firefox, I get a HTTP 401 "authorization required". If I press the F5 key to reload the page in Firefox, it works.
  
  Any suggestions?
  
  Kind regards
  Mark

  Hi Mark,

  I'm sorry that I have not seen that you stayed with APEX 3.2. Therefore, it is fair to ESO who changed...

  First new idea:
  Debug information are useful as we see where Firefox gets to. The flow seems to be the same for both browsers. Perhaps the WebTier sends answers differently. I see another article that could be excluded for Firefox:

          -- See http://www.nabble.com/Empty-POST-requests-on-IE-td15332680.html
          -- We have to trick IE that he thinks the authentication fails, otherwise
          -- he doesn't send any data when issueing a POST because he wants to
          -- do the NTLM stuff again
          owa_util.status_line
            ( nstatus => 401,
              creason => 'Unauthorized',
              bclose_header => FALSE
            );
  

  The commentary says that the part is required for IE. The result for owa_util.status_line is perhaps send too early for Firefox or closed, that the 'old' OSH handled diffrently. If indeed this should be left aside for Firefox, you can try to change the code as follows

  IF WWV_Flow.get_browser_version != 'NSCP'
          THEN
          -- See http://www.nabble.com/Empty-POST-requests-on-IE-td15332680.html
          -- We have to trick IE that he thinks the authentication fails, otherwise
          -- he doesn't send any data when issueing a POST because he wants to
          -- do the NTLM stuff again
          owa_util.status_line
            ( nstatus => 401,
              creason => 'Unauthorized',
              bclose_header => FALSE
            );
  END IF;
  

  This leads me to a second point:
  I remember of this manual, you may need to update the owa_util when using the APEX in combination with OHS 11 g.
  What version of owa_util do you currently use?

  select owa_util.get_version from dual;
  

  APEX 3.2.1 comes with owa_util 10.2.0.6 which is the minimum required version. If your database currently has a lower version, you can update it out of your installation package APEX by running owainst.sql located in the owa- directory as sysdba.

  -Udo

  Published by: Udo on 31.08.2010 14:16
  Comparison of fixed

• LDAP authentication does not

  I'm trying to authenticate to our Active Directory. Makes the composition of the DN string look appropriate? (The names have been changed to protect the innocent)... I use the tool to Test of LDAP in dialog box "edit authentication scheme. I get the red message "authentication failed!"
  
  String DN: cn = % LDAP_USER %, or = users, or = production, dc = bitter, dc = globalaxz, dc = net
  Host: dc3axz001.amer.globalaxz.net
  
  I tried to reduce the chain just ldapuser, bitter, globalaxz, net (depending on the format of the FQDN of the host server) without success. I don't know if I'm simply not defining the DN string correctly... or what.
  
  I don't know if the tool will "walk" to the bottom of the structure of the AD to find a match (or within the OU) - or he asks only one OU for the username?
  
  Apex 3.2.1 on Centos 5.4 (RedHat).

  RESOLVED:

  Instead of using this field of the DN:
  CN = % LDAP_USER %, bitter = DC, DC is domain_name, DC = net

  I used:
  % [email protected]

  worked very well. Thanks to all who helped.

  Rich

  Published by: rdarlin2 on December 14, 2009 16:57

• Custom authentication does not work after upgrade to 4.1

  Hi, are there problems with authentication in 4.1? I can't get my new authentication scheme to work for some reason any. I was wondering, is that there are problems with 4.1?
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: Andyindo on Sep 17, 2011 14:57

  Hi Andyindo,

  Name your packagename.function in your custom authentication as the below and check.

  >return final_users_security.valid_user

  Brgds,
  Mini

  -----------------
  Mark responds promptly

• COA Key does not.

  I have a laptop that I just have to re - install windows on without the original CD as it is second hand. I installed using a SP3 CD and the key on the bottom of the laptop, on the certificate of authenticity does not work when you try to activate. Any ideas?

  "PhobiaB13" wrote in message News: 401cab47-52fa-49 c 8-b632-973bb2db3cae...

  I have a laptop that I just have to re - install windows on without the original CD as it is second hand. I installed using a SP3 CD and the key on the bottom of the laptop, on the certificate of authenticity does not work when you try to activate. Any ideas?

  Try to use the tool to update product key for re - enter your COA key
   
  http://www.Microsoft.com/genuine/selfhelp/xppkuinst.aspx
  --

  Noel Paton | Nil Carborundum Illegitemi | CrashFixPC | The lazy three fingers