RemoteScan is not for some users

Similar Questions

• Questions not selectable answers in quiz slide for some users

  We have a training SCORM Captivate content published on our LMS (SAP Learning Solutions). Some users are unable to answer questions about the content. For these users, the answers are locked and can not be selected. In addition, don't seem not buttons validate and clear.

  The problem about 10% of our users.

  This training contains content and quiz slides slides.

  

  The content is published in SCORM 1.2 (SWF + HTML) with Adobe Captivate 5.5. We had the same problem for some users with the previous version of this training content with Captivate 4.

  All users have the same settings:

  Flash Player 10.3.183.11

  Internet Explorer 6

  Microsoft Windows XP

  Place a button on the first or second slide you need the user to click to go forward with the course.  I've usually place it on a slide that gives an overview of what the module will be about.  Once the user has finished with the slide, they need to click on this button to continue in the content.  The user is not aware that this button has a fixed score and the FACT that it has a score means that Captivate believes that it is part of the questionnaire, which means the scope quiz begins at this time, the first question of the quiz.

  Yes, you click the button, go to properties > reports and select the check box to include in the questionnaire.

• HP M477fdn printers have been impossible to install the driver for some users. We receive the error message following '0 x 00000006 '.

  have been unable to install the driver for some users. We do not receive the following error message.

  Error: 0 x 00000006

  Hi Sameer,

  Thanks for posting your query on the Microsoft Community.

  According to the description, I understand that you are getting an error code.

  I would like to know some information.

  1. You are connected to a domain network?

  2. When exactly do you get this error code?

  3. Do you also have any error message?

  This problem may occur if the print spooler service is stopped.

  To start the spooler service, follow these steps:

  1. click on Startand then click Control Panel.

  2. double-click Administrative Toolsand then click Services.

  3. double-click on the Printer Spooler service and then change the startup type to Automatic. This option sets the spooler service starts automatically when you restart the computer.

  4. If you want to start the spooler service immediately, click Start in the area of The State of the Service .

  I would also refer to the Microsoft Help Article below and check if that helps.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/printer-problems-in-Windows-help#fix-printer-problems=Windows-7&V1H=win8tab1&V2H=win7tab1&V3H=winvistatab1

  Hope this information helps. Please let us know if you need any other help with Windows in the future. We will be happy to help you.

• VMware VIEW how to block or unallow USB for some users

  Hi guys,.

  I have a question, I can block or unallow USB for some users? not all users just someone, I have a pool with 25 machines and need block USB for 4 users, do you have any idea how to do that?

  Thanks for your help

  GPO USB - http://www.petri.co.il/disable_usb_disks_with_gpo.htm

• How can I increase size of mail for some users only in exchange 2003 or the smtp server

  I have 2 break the two server installed ms 2003, an Exchange and a another smtp, Smtp is independent, not added to the domain. My business mail size is limited to all users maximum 5 MB.  But now I need to increase the size of the mail for specific users, and not for all users. can I create a policy for this. Can I increase size of mail for users of 10 or 15 MB. If can where I can configure this option. Exchange or SMTP. Please give me counsel.
  Thank you & best regards
  Anas

  ASK THE QUESTION IN THE EXHANGE SERVER FORUMS:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer/

• Is it possible to hide a conditional function in responsibility. Say it together a small number of users, I need the function display and for some users, it must be hidden.

  Is it possible to hide a conditional function in responsibility. Say it together a small number of users, I need the function display and for some users, it must be hidden.

  Hello

  The normal thing to do is to create a similar additional responsibility and using Exclusions to 'hide' the features you want.

  Then assign it to restricted users.

  Kind regards

  Bashar

• object is missing for some users

  Hello
  I have a custom connector and im doing request put in service, but for some users in the form of object-based is just jumping in based provisioning request. I have checked the Group and permissions, and all eyes. can pls someone tell what could be the reason?
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  I checked "Allow multiple" on the subject of resource and now the form object appears

  I don't understand this... no explanation?

• Possible to make an element editable for some users and read-only for others

  Is it possible to make an element editable for some users and read only for others?
  
  I was able to achieve by catches of the select statement that I used to define an authorization scheme, placing in the State of read-only element. However, I would simply refer to the authorization scheme to use caching and to help keep things cleaner for future maintenance.
  
  Is it possible for a system of authorisation under a condition similar to the way point another element can be referenced by preceding with two reference points (e.g.: P1_First_Name)?

  I accomplished this in one of my applications by setting the value of a hidden Page 0 item on connect, for example P0_ACCESS_PRIVILIGES, and then use the feature 'Read only' integrated into the APEX for each article that I don't read for some users check the value of this element.

• query not using the index for some user

  Hello
  
  I have a query that is running in less than a second for sys, system, or schema owner. However, another user (test_user) take 30 seconds to run the same query.
  
  I certainly dba and privileges identical to test_user as schmea_user, but the result is the same.
  
  I checked
  
  Select * from V$ SYS_OPTIMIZER_ENV;
  
  Both are the same for both users.
  
  I have check the plan to explain to both users. I noticed that for sys/system/schema_owner, the query uses an index, but not the test_user.
  
  All have experience the issue where a user uses an index, but not the other?
  
  Thank you for any assistance.

  Thank you for the display of formatting output, this output is much easier to read.

  One of the first things you notice about the execution plans that is for the owner non-schema "SQL_ID, 0wcs85uywn72m, number of children 1" appears in the output of DBMS_XPLAN, while "SQL_ID 0wcs85uywn72m, child number 0" (the same SQL_ID but a different number of child) appears for the schema owner. "" Whereas the SQL_ID is the same, which indicates that the client requires exactly the same SQL statement, so it's a good start.

  Then, note that in the predicate for the nonschema owner information section the following appears (sometimes with the order of the two conditions switched in position) as a condition placed on each table that is available in the schema:

  filter(("SEAL_FLAG" IS NULL OR "SEAL_FLAG"'Y'))
  

  The above suggests the presence of the virtual private database (or a superset of private database virtual) generated the predicates. You should be able to confirm that this is the case by querying V$ VPD_POLICY using the SQL_ID which was displayed in the DBMS_XPLAN output:

  SELECT
    *
  FROM
    V$VPD_POLICY
  WHERE
    SQL_ID='0wcs85uywn72m';
  

  As a test, I made a few minor adjustments to the example on this page:
  http://Antognini.ch/2011/09/optimizer_secure_view_merging-and-VPD/
  I changed the name of T to T12 and TESTUSER table specified for the schema names. I then created the function S of this page as follows:

  CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION s (schema IN VARCHAR2, tab IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 AS
  BEGIN
    RETURN 'ID < 10';
  END;
  /
  

  I then added a couple of lines in the T12 test table:

  INSERT INTO T12 VALUES (1,1,NULL);
  INSERT INTO T12 VALUES (4,1,NULL);
  INSERT INTO T12 VALUES (10,1,NULL);
  INSERT INTO T12 VALUES (12,1,NULL);
  
  COMMIT;
  

  With an active 10053 trace, I executed the following SQL statement:

  SELECT id, pad
    FROM t12
    WHERE
    spy(id, pad) = 1
  

  The SQL_ID (in my case, found in the 10053 trace file) was 6hqw5p9d8g8wf, so I checked V$ VPD_POLICY to this SQL_ID:

  SELECT
    *
  FROM
    V$VPD_POLICY
  WHERE
    SQL_ID='6hqw5p9d8g8wf';
  
  ADDRESS          PARADDR            SQL_HASH SQL_ID        CHILD_NUMBER OBJECT_OWNER OBJECT_NAME                    POLICY_GROUP                   POLICY                 POLICY_FUNCTION_OWNER          PREDICATE
  ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  000007FFB7701608 000007FFB7743350 1518838670 6hqw5p9d8g8wf            0 TESTUSER     T12                            SYS_DEFAULT                    T_SEC                  TESTUSER                       ID < 10
  

  As noted above, the VPD test function named S added the predicate "ID".< 10"="" to="" the="" sql="">

  There are not many clues in the 10053 trace file in my test VPD generated additional predicates. Trace the following was found shortly after the beginning of the file (this is the SQL statement initially presented):

  ----- Current SQL Statement for this session (sql_id=6hqw5p9d8g8wf) -----
  SELECT id, pad
    FROM t12
    WHERE
    spy(id, pad) = 1
  

  I searched then down in the trace for final after changes query file (to be noted that this sentence could be slightly different in different versions of database Oracle). That's what I found:

  Final query after transformations: ******* UNPARSED QUERY IS *******
  SELECT "T12"."ID" "ID","T12"."PAD" "PAD" FROM "TESTUSER"."T12" "T12" WHERE "TESTUSER"."SPY"("T12"."ID","T12"."PAD")=1 AND "T12"."ID"<10
  kkoqbc: optimizing query block SEL$F5BB74E1 (#0)
  

  Note that the final query after transformation shows how the final version of the query that has been rewritten by the query optimizer before the SQL statement has been executed and this version of the query includes AND "T12". "" IDENTITY CARD ".<10. if="" i="" was="" attempting="" to="" determine="" how="" that=""><10 predicate="" was="" added="" to="" the="" sql="" statement,="" i="" would="" start="" at="" the="" "current="" sql="" statement="" for"="" line="" in="" the="" trace="" file="" and="" search="" down="" the="" trace="" file="" for=""><10* -="" in="" this="" case,="" the="" following="" is="" what="" i="" found="" as="" the="" first="" search="" result,="" very="" close="" to="" the="" "current="" sql="" statement="" for"="" line="" in="" the="" trace="">

  **************************
  Predicate Move-Around (PM)
  **************************
  PM:     PM bypassed: Outer query contains no views.
  PM:     PM bypassed: Outer query contains no views.
  query block SEL$F5BB74E1 (#0) unchanged
  FPD: Considering simple filter push in query block SEL$F5BB74E1 (#0)
  "TESTUSER"."SPY"("T12"."ID","T12"."PAD")=1 AND "T12"."ID"<10
  try to generate transitive predicate from check constraints for query block SEL$F5BB74E1 (#0)
  finally: "TESTUSER"."SPY"("T12"."ID","T12"."PAD")=1 AND "T12"."ID"<10
  

  As can be seen from the above (because the predicate again appeared before and after the line containing the word "Finally: '), the AND"T12 ". "" IDENTITY CARD ".<10 predicate="" was="" already="" added="" to="" the="" original="" sql="" statement="" by="" the="" time="" the="" predicate="" move-around="" section="" of="" the="" trace="" file="" was="" written,="" and="" that="" is="" the="" first="" mention="" of=""><10 in="" the="" trace="" file.="" in="" your="" case,="" you="" would="" search="" the="" 10053="" trace="" file="">

  "SEAL_FLAG" IS NULL
  

  If V$ VPD_POLICY revealed that there are virtual private database (VPD) generated predicates applied to the SQL statement, take a look at the following article in the Oracle documentation library:
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/network.111/B28531/VPD.htm

  This article lists the different points of view, who can be interviewed to learn more about the VPD rules which are in force in the schema. For example, with my SPV test:

  SELECT
    *
  FROM
    ALL_POLICIES;
  
  OBJECT_OWNER                   OBJECT_NAME                    POLICY_GROUP                  POLICY_NAME                    PF_OWNER                       PACKAGE                       FUNCTION                       SEL INS UPD DEL IDX CHK ENA STA POLICY_TYPE              LON
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ----------------------------- ------------------------------ --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ------------------------ ---
  TESTUSER                       T12                            SYS_DEFAULT                   T_SEC                          TESTUSER                       S                                                            YES YES YES YES NO  NO  YES NO  DYNAMIC                  NO
  

  He knows performance issues related to the use of VPD, some of which are Oracle Database version-dependent, and some have been fixed in recent versions. Take a look at the following articles if you have access to My Oracle Support:
  MetaLink (MOS) Doc ID 728292.1 ' known performance problems when you use transparent encryption data and indexes on the encrypted columns.
  MetaLink (MOS) Doc ID 967042.1 "How to investigate Query Performance regressions Caused by VPD (FGAC) predicates?"

  You might find working through the second of the above that the problem is caused by a bug in database Oracle.

  On a side note. Execution plans you have published include the 0 value in the column starts many of the operations in the execution plan. 0 indicates that the operation never actually executed. A 0 is included in the column starts on the line that includes the FULL ACCESS of TABLE of PEOPLE_TRANSACTIONS at least to the OPC. Value 123, a full table of PEOPLE_TRANSACTIONS table scan PROPERTY_CONTAINER_ID was not actually performed.

  Charles Hooper
  http://hoopercharles.WordPress.com/
  IT Manager/Oracle DBA
  K & M-making Machine, Inc.

• Present the online PDF form button does not work for some users

  Two online forms, I created in LiveCycle Designer 8.2 work very well for me. But when some of the users of my site clicking on the Submit button in a form, it just flashes and then does nothing. It's a standard transmission with a Mailto link button. The documents are PDF Version 1.7, and I use Acrobat Pro 9.4.5 and Reader 9.4. Suggestions for troubleshooting would be great.

  This form is activated with the form of rights to the player.  If the full PDF is presented, then the PDF file must be Reader enabled to operate the player.

  Another problem is that sending email is entirely dependent on the user's system.  There must be a local e-mail client installed and registered with the system.  Internet mail will not work.  This is the most likely issue.  Althougth there are other things that could be the problem.  You can consider using the Acrobat.com to distribute your forms.  This method gets around the question for most users.

  Other issues that could cause this problem are the version of Acrobat/Reader users as well as any type of system/security configuration funky.

• Sync Center will fail for some users. Work for others. Is not dependent on machine. No error sync... just no sync.

  Using Windows 7 Pro on desktop computers, Windows Server 2008 on stocks. I have set up actions of the user (the same for everyone) on the server. The share of the 'always available offline' value, flash sync to logoff.

  Synchronization of some user without problem. Some never synchronize. Synchronization log indicates a successful synchronization. I even tried reallocation of a PC, that was fine synchronization for a user to another user. No synchronization to the second user.

  I tried everything I found on the forums, but nothing changes.

  I can manually run SyncToy or FreeFileSync and operation of synchronization. I tried to run these via scheduled tasks and they fail.

  Help please!

  Hi Paul,.

  Thanks for posting in the Microsoft community.

  The question you have posted is complex in this community. I suggest you post in the TechNet Forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/WindowsServer/

  I hope this helps!

• Possible to disable cmd for some users?

  Hi, im having a problem with one of my brothers always tries to hack into windows via cmd when he is angry at someone.
  The problem is that after he did this, spit of Windows and you need to start safe mode and then collect from there.
  It's not good for the computor so I ask you; Is anyway to block some users to use the cmd program?

  Thank you

  Hi, im having a problem with one of my brothers always tries to hack into windows via cmd when he is angry at someone.
  The problem is that after he did this, spit of Windows and you need to start safe mode and then collect from there.
  It's not good for the computor so I ask you; Is anyway to block some users to use the cmd program?

  Thank you

  To run cmd, enter the administrator password.
  Change your administrator password.
  Create a user account for him without admin privileges. It cannot do any damage now.

  t-4-2

• findDeviceforUser() API with loadServiceAttributes = true does not not for some models BES

  In our application, we use the API findDeviceforUser() with loadServiceAttributes = true. This is necessary to interrogate some device related information of BES.

  However, for some devices (especially for BlackBerry 9000) models, we get the following exception:

  "Invalid character exception" and a response of

  3DES, AES-256, 0 x?

  The character of error? corresponds to a (BEL) control character

  Can someone help me please how to fix this. This is a known bug. Are there patches known for this?

  It seems that there is a problem with your BES/BOTTOM configuration. The only values that should be listed for the encryption algorithms are 3DES and AES - 256. '0 x' should not be registered. This value is unexpected, which explains why the BAA is throwing the exception, once this is resolved your application should work with these users.

  I would say to indulge in the BES forum boards or to create a ticket with server support teams to help get this resolved.

• Directory Manager does not see SOME users

  Unity 4.04 SR1 on a CCM 4.12 for a reason any CERTAIN users are not in the Directory Manager.

  We put them as indicated, I tried to remove / save and re check / except that option.

  I confirmed the name DTMF in the Subscriber table is right, but it is not yet that users.

  any ideas?

  Open saweb to these Subscriber pages and make sure that they have a name registered.

• "Oracle installed Base user" responsibility does not not for new users.

  Hi all

  We are facing problems with responsibility 'Oracle installed Base user'. This works well for existing users. When I assign this responsibility to new users, it displays error see screenshot below.

  	Error message
  	The following error occurred:
  	You do not have access to this feature.
  	No other information.
  	If the error persists, contact your system administrator.
  	Administrators can view the source of the page for more technical information about this error.

  I googled for this so that they are suggested adding CSI_NORMAL_USER or CSI_ADMIN to the user roles. even after adding user roles still faced the same question. Please suggest me on this.

  Thanks in advance,

  Guillaume.

  Hello Asif,

  Problem solved by assigning the role of CSI_NORMAL_USER users by logging in with the SYSADMIN user.

  Thanks for your time Asif.

  Thank you

  Guillaume.