resample wave information

Is there a way to re - sample vague information?

I know that I can read a wave file to 11Khz and then write information to 22 kHz or 44 Khz.  But what I want to do is read in the file of 11 Khz, 22 Khz to upconvert, perform processing of the file, maybe combine it with other information and then read it or write.

Of course, I want to go the other way, i.e. downconvert from 22 Khz to 11 Khz.  What would be great would be to have a version of write it Wave leader VI which returns the information in a table instead of save to disk. I guess I could write and then read it again but that seems inelegant to say the least.

Any advice?

I think what you're looking for is the Align attribute and resample express VI.

Tags: NI Software

Similar Questions

  • Sound bank does not work

    I unzip soundbank - deluxe.gm in:

    e:\jdk1.7.0_75\jre\lib\audio\soundbank-Deluxe.GM

    and too much is to:

    Programa\JavaSoft\JRE\1.7.0_75\lib\audio\soundbank-deluxe.gm C:\Archivos

    I have the following code in GET_MIXER.java

    javax.sound.sampled import;

    javax.sound.MIDI import;

    //=====================================================

    public class GET_MIXER {}

    public static Mixer.Info [] getMixerInfo ();

    //=====================================================

    Public Shared Sub main (String [] args) {}

    }

    //=====================================================

    } / / end of class GET_MIXER

    I compile this way:

    D:\EJ_JAVA\SOUND > JAVAC - d. GET_MIXER. Java

    and I have the following result:

    GET_MIXER. Java: 1: error: there is no such thing as javax.sound package

    javax.sound.sampled import;

    ^

    GET_MIXER. Java: 2: error: there is no such thing as javax.sound package

    javax.sound.MIDI import;

    ^

    GET_MIXER. Java: 6: error: package mix does not exist

    public static Mixer.Info [] getMixerInfo ();

    ^

    GET_MIXER. Java: 6: error: lack of method, or declare abstract body

    public static Mixer.Info [] getMixerInfo ();

    ^

    4 errors

    too, I copied soundbank - deluxe.gm to soundbank.gm

    and give me the same result.

    where is the javax.sound package search?

    Wath is bad? I do not know.

    Can you help me please?

    =====================================================================

    SOLUTION.

    Well, the error was a simple "." * »

    The 2 lines produce errors

    javax.sound.sampled import;

    javax.sound.MIDI import;

    The 2 lines are solutions

    Javax.sound.sampled import. *;

    Javax.sound.midi import. *;

    and the next line deleted

    public static Mixer.Info [] getMixerInfo ();

    Reserching in the Java Documentation, I did

    a program to play a sound file bit (11.0 KB. (WAV), and it is:

    =====================================================================

    Javax.sound.sampled import. *;

    Javax.sound.midi import. *;

    import java. IO;

    //=====================================================

    public class PLAY_SOUND_FILE {}

    //=====================================================

    Public Shared Sub main (String [] args) {}

    File = new File ("1.WAV");  Size 11KB

    try {}

    Information AudioInputStream = AudioSystem.getAudioInputStream (file);

    AudioFormat audio_format = information.getFormat ();

    System.out.println ("\nAudioInputStream.getFormat ()"WAV"] =" + information.getFormat () + "]");

    Line clip;

    DataLine.Info info = new DataLine.Info (Clip.class, audio_format);

    If (!.) AudioSystem.isLineSupported (info)) {}

    Handle the error.

    System.out.println ("\nLine is NOT taken in charge [] =" + info + "]");

    }

    else {}

    open and start the line.

    line = AudioSystem.getLine (Clip) (info);

    Line.Open (information);

    Line.Start ();

    Thread.Sleep (500);

    Line.Stop ();

    Line.Close ();

    line = null;

    }

    }

    catch (Exception e) {}

    e.printStackTrace ();

    }

    }

    } / / end of class

    =====================================================================

    It will play the song file

    and the output on the screen is:

    ("WAV") AudioInputStream.getFormat = [PCM_SIGNED 22050.0 Hz, 16-bit,

    [mono, 2 bytes/frame, little endian]

    =====================================================================

    If you do not use the line

    Thread.Sleep (500);

    do not hear the sound

  • Conflict between IE8 and Adobe Flash Player

    Hello

    I am running Windows XP Pro SP3, IE8 and Adobe Flas Player 12.0.0.70

    On some WEB sites when it is opened with the Information IE 8 bar (yellow) opens with a message

    "An add-on for this Web site has failed. Check the security settings in options Internet of potential conflicts.

    After cheking modules are so dissable

    Shockwave Flash Object name
    Publisher Adobe Systems Incorporated
    Enabled state
    Date of the file yesterday, 21 February 2014, 16:27
    Version 12.0.0.70

    Then IE does not worning.any the information bar more.

    Reinstalled IE 8, also playing with the security settings, reinstalled Flash player, but without success.

    Imidiatelly after activating the shock wave, information on some websites bar appears again.

    For egzample like this:http://www2.staseraintv.com/

    Please me advice what to do to avoid this inconvinient.

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/318378

  • First round with resampling of wave and the memory is full error

    Hi all

    I have a little problem with my VI that I don't understand.

    I'm doing a motor controller application that can take a random waveform and TTL signals for a motor controller.

    It's all good, but the first time I run VI I get a memory full error (see photo)... It is only the first time after I opened labview I get

    This error... Second time I have start the VI, it works as it should. I guess it's something to do with what kind of data it records in memory.

    Looks like it has something to do with the function resample, but exactly what I'm not sure...

    I hope some of you guys (or girls) are able to help me, thank you!

    Good day!

    Kind regards

    Tommy

    Got yourself into a race condition.  We all have a time.  Delete the local section and use the wire.  Check out this thread for more information on just how many of us have done

  • Frequency measurement and phase of a square wave using to extract the information of your unique vi

    Hi all

    I'm trying to measure the frequency and phase of a square wave from a data acquisition card using vi retrieves your unique information. So far, the frequency can be measured precisely, but there are a few problems with the measurement of phase.

    I have attached a sample program here. I generate the wave square using Square Wave PtByPt vi. The default sample size is 1000. When I put the frequency = 7.43, phase = 80, the frequency can be measured precisely, but the phase is completely. Is there something wrong with my program?

    Thank you very much for your help.

    Best regards

    A square wave is not a single signal ;-)

    If you have a square wave use the edges to make measurements.

  • Windows Media Player 12 loses album artist information when you use WHS .wav

    There seems to be a bug in WMP 12 who loses the album artist information when you use a WHS .wav files.

    Installation - WMP 12 on Windows 7 ultimate. WHS pp3. Music files stored in .wav format.

    There is a marking Wav format is possible. I read on Broadcast Wav files. They are 32-bit. I also read on 64-bit Wav files. What I read there is a limit to the size of the files Wav 32-bit and 64-bit Wav files exceed this limit. Most of the people don't need now. But as a producer of music, I can see how me should before you. Look for a program called reason by Propellerhead software: http://www.propellerheads.se/products/reason/. I ' v read in their help file, you can send support and they will help you find what you need. I've also read about this and said a little on other internet forums for producers. I have no reason, I use another software.

    Broadcast Wav: He is apparently slightly different than regular Wav files. It doesn't have as much support. Some programs or systems apparently don't read the id3 tags, have trouble with the id3 tags or have trouble with this format. So until this id3 Wav tagging is common and Wav files EVENTUALLY get their marking permanently, then what is out at the moment is all that is available.

    WMA lossless, Wav and mp3 320 kbps, etc. have a difference in sound. Listen for yourself on your device with the SAME material and the SAME Ripper programs your test files.

    The other way I tested is: I make music. Then I tore, Wav, WMA Lossless and a type of lossless, mp3 320 Kbps and mp3 256 kbps. I put all the them in the music program, I separated, but on the same timeline. I cut everything that I did not listen. I spent some time checking them. There were notable and other differences not so. I noticed a difference in the WMA and WAV. It's light and sometimes noticeable. Most people cannot tell the difference, and an MA at home or in a club from a Wav will not be a huge difference, especially when a Dj, or you can set low, the midrange and treble slightly.

    I couldn't test the AAC lossless files. My program is old and can't stand them. AAFC would however close to WMA. Give or take.

    WAV is a champion and always the wins service. I wish he was marking. :-).

    Windows Media Player has a certain set of algorithms. And one CAN customize the tear. Some ripping programs ALLOW you to customize the way in which he is torn. But you can run into problems. For example: some compression or equalizer settings are perfect for 90% of an album, but most of the songs are recorded differently or edited and mixed differently. If they are not always level throughout the album, and there may be some fluctations.

    I myself would enjoy tears to measure for a better quality and even be able to MAXIMIZE the lossless or compressed (for example: mp3) formats and make their the best sound possible. But it takes too long, and most people don't have this time or need this. These people do as a profession, are HARDCORE audiophiles or archive sound for a much higher use,:-P.

    I don't know what are the algorithms of WMP to rip. ITunes or WinAmps, etc.. It comes to be able to do custom tears. These algorithms affect your copy, transfer and archiving. This is another reason why each program is slightly different, even when they use the same open or not open source coding.

    That's what I'v has learned. It's the best I got.

  • MP3 to wav - the amount of information you let go

    Hello!

    We have scanned 1000 wav files large to 44100, 32-bit, stereo 500 discs vinil and audio cassettes. Then we cut them into smaller parts (songs units per person) and convert these parts directly to MP3 (44100, 16 bit, stereo) batch.

    Now, we would like to have these units samller also in wav format (44100, 16 bit, stereo,), not only in mp3 format.

    We have two options to:

    1. to cut again and convert it to source original wav files (44100, 32-bit, stereo) to small wav files (44100, 16 bit, stereo).

    2. If you want to convert to mp3 (44100, 16 bit, stereo) directly to wav in batch (44100, 16 bit, stereo).

    We would like to know how much information lose us if we choose the second option instead of the first - convert mp3 to wav? In this particular case, it is much faster and easier!

    The main problem is that we cut wav files original (44100, 32-bit, stereo) in a number of smaller units (about 6,000 smaller units) and save the package in the process directly in mp3 format. If you have to cut them again to our original wav files and save them as wav (like mp3) it would take us a couple of weeks!

    Thanks for the reply.

    How you lose depends entirely on what rate the MP3 files have been encoded to. If they were musical and encoded files in 128 k MP3 then the loss will be noticeable by most people in a direct comparison. If you have been lucky enough to save them at 192 k or higher, then the differences will be less obvious.

    If you want a rough idea of what you lose, it is essentially in the quieter parts which are 'hidden' by more strong adjacent sounds. What is happening is that the quieter sounds are stored at a lower resolution (fewer bits). This gives rise to what we call a 'coding gain", and this is the measure of what determines the final quality. It tends to give a quality "unreal" sort of sounds and is not only pleasant to listen to the very bottom of encoding rates.

    If the goal of saving the original in the form of wav files was somehow an attempt to keep a copy of superior quality, which must have - then you have really a re-cutting choices; You have to do. In the contrary case, it there was absolutely no reason to do this exercise in the order that you did it in the first place, was there?

    So despite the work, I see No point in doing so from MP3 files in any case, when you have 32-bit original which only require redividing and name.

  • shock wave does not work

    I'm on windows and whenever I connect to facebook an error message appears saying that shockwave has problems.
    Can you help me solve this problem?
    Thank you very much for your help!
    Best wishes
    John Cantu

    Edit: removed personal information for your protection. Please note that we cannot offer support by telephone, so please continue in the forum. Thank you for your understanding! (philipp)

    A wave of shock, or Shockwave Flash?

    Take uninstaller from here:
    Uninstall Flash Player | Windows
    Uninstall Flash Player | Mac
    Reinstall the latest version.

    Flash Player Version 17.0.0.134
    https://www.Adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html

    Shockwave Director Version 12.1.7.157 http://get.adobe.com/shockwave/

  • can send but cannot receive messages on ipad with IOS new 9.3.2 waves I

    can send but cannot receive messages on ipad with IOS new 9.3.2 waves I

    1. make sure that the information entered in the transmission & reception area in settings - Messages is correct

    2. If so - settings - Messages - switch off

    Log settings - iCloud

    Do a forced reboot - after all open applications using the app Chooser - invoked by fast double pressing the home button and drag upwards on each app until it disappears from the screen.

    Meet the sleep/wake and home buttons down until you see the logo  - then release and allow normal start upward

    If you can't send or receive messages on your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch

  • Removal of WAV files after you create AAC version in iTunes

    I recently deleted about 5 GB of iTunes WAV files after their conversion to AAC files. I chose to "move to trash" and then empty the trash. When I rebooted my computer, there is about 5 GB of free storage added to my HD but not the Audio storage, which has not changed. I forgot to check the free space came as I thought it would be audio.

    I tried manually deleted WAV files and they do not appear on my HD, only new AAC versions I created. I'm curious to know why the Audio storage did not change at all, even if the files are audio files and seem to have been properly removed from my HD. I wonder if they were not stored somewhere else and if so I want to make sure that they have been deleted. What worries me is that my iTunes library is 94 Go yet my Audio storage is 126 GB. I understand Garageband, etc. takes place, but the gap seems to be excessive. Please help/explain whether you have any ideas!

    Much appreciated!

    You'd better ask about the way in which the information system is referred to in the forum system for your computer. If it were me, I'd be just glad if you removed 5 GB of files 5 GB have been released.  If you want more details, try a specific tool like OmniDiskSweeper: https://www.omnigroup.com/more/

  • import a WAV file into iTunes?

    Can someone explain to me how do I import a WAV file into iTunes? I'm dragging in, right/option clicking on the file and go - open in iTunes but nothing happens and I can't play or do anything with it. Thank you

    It adds no doubt, but given that WAV files do not contain track information is to find with no name of the album and as the file name for a song title. Look in your recently added playlist.

  • WAV MP3 VS INFO

    new library of itunes, from scratch.  Imported on the old computer to the old library mp3 songs appear very well with all the info.  Songs imported on the last computer wav files with "replace old files" selected imported fine on the old computer, but when I look at the file in the file that it has no info attached to it.  songs are titled the same, and in the right artist, album folder tree as planned, but do not show up with the cover of the album (easy fix).  but artist and album info appear as empty when they are imported into the library

    In WAV format files do not store track information internally as pretty much any other popular file format.  Search on the website Dougscripts for a script that will assign the track information parsed from the file names if that helps.

    Is there a reason for not to transfer the library from your old computer, including the database library file that contains all the data track?

  • Do I need other Anti-Aliasing before resampling

    Hi all

    Just thinking how this resampling works.

    Basically, it's just a standard resampling with dynamics of the frequency. This means he could the high frequency alias noise down in the region of interest.

    The analog inputs have smoothing filters that will filter the signals to (-3dB) 24.56 kHz who works for the IO module because the nyquist frequency is 25 kHz.

    However we then re - sample up to (for 50 Hz) rated 12.8 kHz. This means a nyquist of 6.4 kHz for everything from 6.4 to 24.56 kHz can alias downwards.

    This can be solved by introducing a digital filter in the FPGA with a better cut-off frequency (to handle variation so probably want a bandwidth of at least 7.04 kHz 55 Hz) but I've not seen this in any of the examples.

    Am I mistaken, or nobody ever bothered?

    See you soon,.

    James

    Decided to take the experimental approach!

    Generated a wave of 50 Hz with a 5% 10 kHz imposed on this topic and it doesn't come through.

    Dig deeper into the resampling, there seems to be a FIR filter in it which I think is taking care of him.

    See you soon,.

    James

  • Simulate the sine wave using LabVIEW FPGA with NOR-myRIO and display in real time

    Hello

    I'm relatively new to LabVIEW FPGA. I am trying to test (and later apply) controllers high speed on myRIO.

    At this point, I'm trying to simulate the sine wave from 1 to 10 kHz using Sinewave generator VI express. I also intend to display the sine wave on the time real (RT) using FIFO. However, I had a bit of trouble to understaing various synchronization parameters.

    1. how to encode information about the sampling frequency generating sine wave? (The side FPGA vi requires only the frequency of the signal and possibly phase and does not rate update lines)

    2. how to estimate the number of items in a FIFO? (that is, the relationship between the rate of updates to loop (RT), the signal frequency, sampling frequency and the number of items in the FIFO)

    It would be great if we could share a very simple program (side host and target) that did something similar.

    Thank you

    MILIN

    Milot,

    I think the problem is the type of data in your FIFO. Your FIFO is configured to use a data type of I16. The problem is the number, it displays only ever will be-1, 0 or 1. To resolve this problem, you must send the sine wave as a fixed point data and convert it to a double on the side of the RT. This should significantly improve your resolution.

  • output signals of the rectangle a PEAK sine wave conversion

    Hello

    I have a question on the treatment of a PIC16F84 output signals. It seems that the simulation of Multisim does not work properly - but before I blame Multisim, I ask the community NOR or software engineers or a solution. Because I'm German, you are invited to continue this thread in German if it is allowed by the rules of the forum. If you need additional information to analyze my problem, I'll be happy to provide.

    The circuit itself has to convert "composition by pulse" signals "tone" (DTMF tones). So you can get old, classic phones work on new devices that do not support the "composition of pulse" more.

    The circuit is powered by the analog telephone line current loop line. The PIC is provided by a rudimentary voltage regulation and count pulse signals (voltage failures / power interruption on the telephone line). After that the captain means the series of impulses in their equal number (e.g. 3 pulses = number 3). The captain gives finally two signals with different frequencies to generate a DTMF tone (e.g. number 3 here is 697 and 1477Hz). As you can see in my PDF file attached, it works very well.

    Now I have to convert the rectangle wave given by the captain to an at least similar to a sine wave form - otherwise the device that receives the DTMF tones won't understand them.

    So I connected a low-pass filter at the output of the PIC. Now, expect the rectangle signal to be smooth in a way as the 'e-function' will (loading / discharging a capacitor through a resistor). But the results are very far from that - as you can see I have very strange curves.

    When I implemented a frequency generator with the same output signal as the PEAK and the low pass filter even I get curves as expected.

    So we can say that the output of the PIC works like a frequency generator in my circuit. But why does the filter not behave as it should?

    I've tried a lot of different values for the parameters of my RC-filter and simulation - this does not solve the problem.

    It would be nice if someone has any idea how to solve this problem.

    Thank you.

    The output impedance of the PEAK may be too high. May be that my car 50 output? Try scaling of impedance of the filter.  Do the 10000 ohms resistance and capacitor 10 nF.

    Lynn

Maybe you are looking for