Resolution of Windows 7 is terribly lower than previous Vista

Hi all, I'm very tired right now and I need your help:

I have a HP HDX X 16-1155 ca Premium Notebook Pc (which I love) and had Vista on it. I liked a lot and has a resolution of the screen, IF I remember correctly, 1600 x something high.

I've been a happy sailor until 3 days ago, I got my windows 7. Let me say that, in addition to its fast start-up, it's the worst microsoft software that was never published. But anyway, I'll keep my opinions about it * beep * ty product myself.

My problem is the following:

my maximum screen resolution is 1366 x 768 at 60 Hz (you're fricking kidding me)... with this resolution my icons make it my laptop look like the teenager's laptop a Virgin... unicorns and other things.

My video card is a GT Geforce9600m which I've updated to the latest version and still I can't increase my screen resolution!

I want my laptop back! Why did Vista, with a smile on my face, 3 days ago, I had a super high resolution, and today, windows 7 is now * beep * ing with the Navy wrong? I don't have time for that, right now, I am working in afghanistan and need your help people.

If I was born rich, I would buy a windows 7 just to crack his cd, every day!

Base system device is your card reader. Windows Update could offer some drivers if you run it manually from the control panel (display the icon) > Windows Update

This is the home page for this model, bookmark, you can find all your HP drivers there.

http://h10025.www1.HP.com/ewfrf/wc/product?product=3860262&LC=en&cc=us&DLC=en&lang=en&cc=us

Tags: Notebooks

Similar Questions

  • I have a message saying "windows virtual memory is low"

    I'm using windows xp (32) bits and a message keeps coming up saying "Windows virtual memory is low" what can I do about it please can someone tell me? ".

    If you mean that you see a message like this:

    Virtual memory minimum too low: your system is low on virtual memory.  Windows is increasing the size of your virtual memory paging file.

    This means that Windows XP is to let you know that he does his work.  The message is not an error message - this is an informational message.

    If XP thinks that the size of the swap file (usually c:\pagefile.sys) is too small to accommodate your day-to-day transactions, it will adjust the paging file to expand the pagefile and display this message as it does.  It is not necessarily a 'problem', but the message is boring.

    Sometimes, the message indicates someone was tampering with the XP of the paging file settings to try to solve another problem that usually has nothing to do with their paging file and resolve things inefficiently.

    This could mean that the settings have been adjusted for certain values that don't make sense for the configuration of the system.  Unless we know the system better, you can't just pick certain values out of the air and that your system behaves effectively.  You might not see the message again, but this does not mean that the settings are correct.

    This could mean that the settings have never been properly in the first place when you first install of XP and things must be properly configured.

    Sometimes, as your system configuration changes over time and other applications are running and get bigger, you may add additional RAM to your system to accommodate things (or run the number of requests).

    At least that learn you more about managing memory than Windows XP, it is usually best to simply let XP manage the size of your virtual memory paging file.

    To see what your current, make settings right click post work, properties, advanced, performance settings, Advanced tab, virtual memory, and then click the button change.

    Make a note of the current settings in case you need to change their return more later.

    The best setting for the size of swap file is usually going to be:

    System managed size

    Right click my computer, properties, Advanced tab, Performance... Settings, Advanced tab, virtual memory... Change.

    Note the current setting, so you can change things later if you have a problem.

    If it is already done, on the size of swap file:

    System managed size

    Don't forget to click on Set (to be defined), OK (several times) and then restart your computer.

    Windows XP will attempt to affect a swap file approximately 1.5 times the total amount of RAM installed on your system.  To manage the size of paging file Windows XP is enough for most configurations.

    If your system is not set to the size of the managed system, you must determine how it changed and why (usually a bad reason), make a note of the current settings to change them back later if necessary, and then change the setting to the size of the managed system, click on the Set button and then click on apply to apply the changes (you will be asked to restart).

    "Because someone told me to" is not a good reason to start making adjustments to the size of pagefile.  Setting just above to enlarge it by an arbitrary value can ease the symptoms of the problem and stop message, but may not result in the best configuration for your system.

    All the advice to 'Increase the value of the initial and maximum size to a higher value' are misinformed ideas that come from not knowing how to work XP - How do you increase it and what happens if you increase too?

    If you want your system to operate as efficiently as possible, you must understand what is happening and fix it properly and not only begin to try things or make some arbitrary adjustments.

    The size of the pagefile can really need adjustment, but you should at least try to know what you're doing and why you need to do.  It is unlikely that anyone can tell you how to adjust your settings properly without more information.

    If you don't know what are the best settings, or if you are not sure what should be your settings and need help looking at your stuff, follow these steps:

    Since the implementation of the Microsoft Answers forum does not ask for any kind of information system when a new question is asked, we know absolutely nothing about your system.  Not knowing the basic information a problem prolongs the frustration and the agony of these issues.

    Thank you MS Answers, allowing the resolution of simple problems as frustrating and a lot of time as possible.

    Provide information on your system, the better you can:

    What is your system brand and model?

    What is your Version of XP and the Service Pack?

    Describe your current antivirus and software anti malware situation: McAfee, Symantec, Norton, Spybot, AVG, Avira!, MSE, Panda, Trend Micro, CA, Defender, ZoneAlarm, PC Tools, Comodo, etc..

    Click Start, run and enter in the box:

    Msinfo32

    Click OK, and when the system info summary appears, click on edit, select all (Ctrl-A), copy (Ctrl-C) and paste (Ctrl-V) the information back here in your next reply.

    There will be some personal information (such as the user name and the name of the system), and what appears to be personal information for you, simply delete the personal information of the pasted information.

    This minimize back Q & A and eliminate the guesswork and assumptions.

  • P2416D, XPS 8000, GTX 650, resolution of Windows 10

    Resolution 2048 x 1152 on some windows applications will appear as the Control Panel, the OSD and Nvidia app that all show 2560 x 1440.

    Graphics card: GTX 650 with connection HDMI, Dell XPS 8000

    How can I get windows to display the correct resolution?

    Is it related to high resolution?

    Thank you

    I have since solved the problem by turning off the display on some applications. Windows 10 had by default

    scaling of the display to 125%, therefore the resolution has been reported that 25% lower, 2048 x 1152

    instead of 2560 x 1440.

  • Why the 2d graphics score is much lower than the 3d

    upper graphical desktop score is significantly lower than any other partition on the windows experience index. The index is just a waste of time or is there a reason for this 1 score to be much lower

    upper graphical desktop score is significantly lower than any other partition on the windows experience index. The index is just a waste of time or is there a reason for this 1 score to be much lower

    The score is less on your computer because your video (graphics) card was obviously designed for its 3D graphics was paramount while 2D was a secondary function.  (You have a game system).

    What specific video card do you have?

  • Does anyone else have a problem with the left speaker is much lower than the right?

    Any source that I use the left speaker is much lower than the left. If I put my finger on the right I can feel the pressure of air pushed but not by the left. Is it an iPhone defective 7?

    Hello, TopDog16!

    Welcome to congratulations on getting a new iPhone and Apple support communities 7.  From what I see in your post, you have any questions on the stereo speakers in your new iPhone.  I would be happy to help you with that!

    Indeed, your iPhone has holes on both right and left sides on the lower edge (on each side of the connector of the Lightning).  The holes on the right are only speaker on this edge of the phone, however.  The other speaker in the pair is at the top of the phone, where the cut is, just above the screen.  Check here to see if sound comes out.

    This page has a large diagram of the iPhone of 7 speakers (in the section entitled "Buttons and external connectors"): iPhone 7 - technical specifications

    Have a great rest of your week!

  • You just bought a macbook pro retina. Why the resolution of the camera is terrible?

    You just bought a macbook pro retina. Why the resolution of the camera is terrible? Is there a solution?

    The facetime camera is only 720 p, which is 0.92 megapixel. Same 1080 p is only 2.07mp.

    It's really designed only for video calls, if you really want to make HiRes video on the internet.

  • Audio MP3 and .mov audio playback in a lower than normal field.

    Randomly, some Web sites audio mp3 or audio .mov plays at a lower than normal tilt in Firefox.

    Have you checked the settings in QuickTime player?

  • How do I customize the resolution of Windows XP so I can do full screen in a virtual machine?

    OK, so I'm using Ubuntu Linux, but I want to kind of run Netflix. Given that Netflix only works on Mac OS X and Windows, I found a way to run Netflix inside a virtual box. Since I am under GNOME, which has a range of tool up and down * I replaced the bottom panel with a well dock, so it gives him more room * I can not afford to make the maximum resolution. Is there a way to customize the resolution of Windows XP, so I can watch Netflix easier? Otherwise, I stay with 1024 x 768

    Hello

    Windows Virtual PC on Linux is not supported. For more information on the supported operating system, see this link.

    http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/Virtual-PC/support/requirements.aspx

    In addition, also refer to this link.

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/w7itprovirt/thread/01cf6367-AA42-4351-93F6-6c7db5f6e532

    Hope the helps of information.

  • What I need to know is the name and location of the executable that runs when you click on detect monitors in the menu screen resolution of windows 7?

    Original title: name/location of the executable that runs when you click on detect monitors?

    What I need to know is the name and location of the executable that runs when you click on detect monitors in the menu screen resolution of windows 7?

    Hello

    Your question is better suited in the MSDN forums. Please post your question in the MSDN forums.

    You can follow the link to your question:
    http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/

    It will be useful.

  • JPS-00080: credentials 12.1.2.0.0 store schema Version is lower than the latest version of schema 12.1.3.0.0, upgrade the store schema of credentials to the latest version.

    JPS-00080: credentials 12.1.2.0.0 store schema Version is lower than the latest version of schema 12.1.3.0.0, upgrade the store schema of credentials to the latest version.

    Hi all

    When you try to extend my domain, it fails with the above error.

    any suggestions on a fix?

    is this related to the Fusion Infrastructure ADF RCU utility?

    Thank you

    Hi JCGO,.

    Installed on your DB schema is 12.1.2.0.0, but the Extension of domain requires 12.1.3.0.0.

    One solution is to run the 12.1.3.0.0 UCR, fall of the existing on your DB schema followed by installation 12.1.3.0.0 on the DB schema, so that the extension of area Gets the 12.1.3.0.0 schema

    Something more is to open the template on which you spread the field. The models are present in ${MW_HOME} / oracle_common/common/models/wls, explore requirements inside the yourtemplate.jar and comment out the store schema version prerequisite credentials. This is not a good approach, but again, it's going to be a good solution since the schema 12.1.2.0.0 and 12.1.3.0.0 won't much difference.

    Thank you

    Shiva Shankar B N

  • Bought Office Acrobat 11 DC Pro to my PC running Windows 7 - I have more than enough RAM and storage, but get the message: "this application cannot be installed on this operating system. The installation program will end now. Please refer to the minimum s

    Bought Office Acrobat 11 DC Pro to my PC running Windows 7 - I have more than enough RAM and storage, but get the message: "this application cannot be installed on this operating system. The installation program will end now. Please refer to the minimum requirements to... "Can't determine the location on the Adobe Web site to get answers. Any suggestions?

    I deleted an earlier version of Acrobat Pro from my computer. Still, I get the same message.

    Hi John,.

    Please specify if you have purchased DC Acrobat or Acrobat 11 or upgrade you to the latest patch for Acrobat 11, that is to say 11.0.11 so that we can help you accordingly.

    I wonder if you have checked your system requirements before you download Acrobat.

    I would also ask to share with you the screenshot of the error message with us.

    You could probably uninstall Acrobat using cleaning tool. Here is the link for the same thing.

    http://labs.Adobe.com/downloads/acrobatcleaner.html

    If you were installing DC, check out the following link to download.

    https://helpx.Adobe.com/Acrobat/KB/Acrobat-downloads.html (classic)

    https://helpx.Adobe.com/Acrobat/KB/Acrobat-DC-downloads.html (continued)

    Concerning

    Sukrit diallo

  • REP-1213: field refers to the column at a frequency lower than his group

    Is it possible to do a field that is located on a lower level group to be displayed in a group that is at a higher level in the report?

    I have a field that is in a group of lower level on a report, and I want it to appear as a header, a group which is a level above his own group. The field must remain in the original group, but should not appear in the report as a column within the original group but should appear under the heading.

    I tried and received the error REP-1213: reference field column to a frequency lower than his group, but how can I get what I want to do without getting this error? Is there a way to show this field in the header without moving in the group header? Should I create an alias or function or what and how?
    Help, please.

    user8655468 wrote:
    Sorry, I do not seem to get to you. MY report has 2 groups of repetition. The first group student_name, course_code, course_name and the 2nd group academic_year, module_name, module_code and module_grade. Academic_year which is the 2nd group should appear as a Cape as well as the elements of the first group, but may not be moved from its original group because it goes with the modules. The report displays a history of modules of a 1st year student for the current year for the school year the header will present the current academic year for a student.

    I do not understand how I should use a column of synthesis to achieve what I want to do. Please can you explain more. Thank you.

    I think you know about the analytical column. If your school year is filed, you can use it to the analytical column. Being a function of synthesis sum. You take this analytical column to group 1 and select the source of the 2nd group. Then display the 1st frame.

    Hope this will help you...

    If someone useful or appropriate, please mark accordingly.

  • In Firefox 29 Center by clicking at the top of a tab in a zoomed window will open a closed tab previously instead of close the tab you clicked on

    In Firefox 29 Center by clicking at the top of a tab in a zoomed window will open a closed tab previously instead of close the tab that you clicked.

    Is this expected behavior? And if so is it possible to turn it off?

    Thank you

    Middle-clicking on a tab the farm, any means - by clicking on an empty area of the tab bar opens a new tab.

    A different behavior is probably caused by an add-on like Tab Mix Plus tab-based. If you are unsure if you have a such add-on, restart Firefox with disabled modules and check if the problem persists.

  • Firefox 4.0.1 is extremely slow - slower than previous versions

    Firefox 4.0.1 is extremely slow - slower than previous versions. Response time extremely slow, even after I visited a Web site previously.

    Go to HELP and select "restart with disabled modules. If access speeds back up then there is a problem with a plugin addon. Post here with results.

  • I have Windows XP Pro. Can I upgrade to Windows 7 without having to first install Vista?

    I have Windows XP Pro. and lose the connection with my printer (HP Officejet 6500 and I was told that I had to upgrade to Windows 7) Can I upgrade to Windows 7 without having to first install Vista?

    I have Windows XP Pro. and lose the connection with my printer (HP Officejet 6500 and I was told that I had to upgrade to Windows 7) Can I upgrade to Windows 7 without having to first install Vista?

    You can - clean installation however.  No direct path from Windows XP to Windows 7.

    If the machine is old, but - I wouldn't bother.  You will end up by it hate because it is slow and probably blame the operating system.

    The upgrade to Windows 7 is not a solution for the loss of connectivity to a printer - not a logic.

    Is what SPECIFIC printer this?

    HP Officejet 6500 All - in - One Printer series - E709

    If you download and install the latest appropriate WIndows XP complete software driver for your printer and maybe upgrade the firmware of the printer itself-, it would probably solve your problem.  If you use it as a wireless printer (it is printed through your network, but not connected by a cable [ethernet]) so you can check for updgrades to the firmware of your router (level) and reconfigure your network completely wireless if you start with a good foundation.

Maybe you are looking for