Road map

Is there an estimated release date or a time window when you can free up more built?

I like what I see and want more.

Hello

We are constantly working to improve the user experience on the application, however, a release date of today cannot be resolved.

For the last develeopments you check this thread: http://community.skype.com/t5/Windows-Phone-BETA/Skype-0-2-0-0-Beta-for-Windows-Phone/td-p/525371

----------------------------
If the answer was helpful please give Kudos and if the problem is solved mark with the solution for other users. Thank you!

Tags: Skype

Similar Questions

  • Static NAT with the road map for excluding the VPN

    We have problems of access to certain IPs NATted static via a VPN.  After some research, we have learned that you have to exclude traffic destined for the VPN to the static NAT using a road map. So we did this:

    10.1.1.x is the VPN IP pool.

    access-list 130 refuse ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 130 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

    sheep allowed 10 route map
    corresponds to the IP 130

    IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 1.1.1.1 sheep map route

    Above worked to fix the VPN but the IP 192.168.1.5 is no longer publicly available via 1.1.1.1.  What seems to happen, is that the static NAT is not really work and this IP address is NATted with the IP of PAT.

    Any ideas on how to get this to work?

    Thank you
    Diego

    Hello

    The following example details exactly your case:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094634.shtml

    Try to replace the 192.168.1.0 subnet by the host address.

    It should work

    HTH

    Laurent.

  • Road map of Horizon view

    Hello

    Is there anyone who could share the bird's-eye view of the Horizon with the next version roadmap? Thanks in advance.

    VMwares policy not to publicly discuss road maps and features coming in public forums.

    You should reach your manager of your relationships of VMware alliance get good information about this meeting.

    Linjo

  • Road map application and product featured?

    Is there a list of feature requests, or procedure?

    Also is there a product roadmap available?

    I don't want to ask for a feature that has been requested, or which is already planned for.

    It would be as well to track the progress of these things, so I'll know when / if I can start recommending Firefox OS to my clients who are looking for an alternative to iPhonedroidberry.

    Hello Mattzees, for the feature request I would recommend a bug of deposit at bugzilla.mozilla.org - here's a public for firefox OS roadmap in case you want to go first through here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/B2G/Roadmap

  • Road map of the MAF

    What are the plans for the MAF and 10 Windows? I'll be able to write once and deploy on Windows 10/Android/IOS?

    If so, CRG go full circle and replace the ADF on the desktop? (Since Windows 10 is on Desktop and mobile).

    Thank you

    NAT

    Support for MAF windows devices is something we are considering for future releases.

  • Could someone give me a road map? I am very confused!

    I want to use the OAM Single Sign-On solution integrate with an asp.net application, and I have deployed a development environment based on the 11.1.1.5.0(OAM OAM 11.1.1.5.0 + OIM 11.1.1.5.0 + SOA 11.1.1.5.0 + OID 11.1.1.6 Oracle DB 11 GR 2).

    I have two websites:
    -> Site1 - asp.net application. In the application, which pages are protected, and pages that are not protected is dynamic, because the administrator can change the settings frequently. So I can't use the definition of static resources to define URL is protected and that the URL is not protected.
    -> Site2 - a static website html - I was able to set the Manager sources protected/not protected use of resources/strategy of the OAM.

    In Site1, I leave only wanted to use the UNIQUE of the OAM, the asp.net application authentication solution to determine whether the current page is protected:
    -> If the page needs the user to log, and then navigate the user connecting to the OAM page, the user must enter credentials; and then OAM will sail to the resource requested to the user if the logged in user.
    --> Once the user signed the Site1, then the user access to the protected resources Site2 have more need to sign again. Vice versa.

    Is this possible? Any suggestions are appreciated.

    Hi Alan,

    The .net application organizes resources protected and unprotected in different directories? For example, if all of the protected resources are placed under/dotnetapp/protected then you can always use static resources defined in OAM, as implicit Sandy. (In this case you would define resources OAM/dotnetapp/protected/and /dotnetapp/protected/.../* so that all the resources in this directory are protected.

    If the .net resources are truly dynamic and protected place resources side-by-side with resources unrprotected in the same directory and then, Yes, you could develop a .net application which would effectively repeated what does a WebGate - but it would be a development effort.

    Kind regards
    Colin

  • Road map of DPS R26

    Awaiting release R26. When? 25 April or later?

    Thank you

    Filippo

    It is looking like v26 will be released May 1. Please plan accordingly.

  • How to determine the amount of adds to add to my itinerary map

    I currently have two different ISP and I use BGP for redundancy. I see about 50% more traffic coming inbound on one ISP on the other. So I want to do is precede my ACE using a road map to one of the ISP's to create a more equitable balance of incoming traffic. I understand that this is not an accurate method of inbound load balancing and to my knowledge it is not an exact science to the load balancing incoming BGP with two ISP using different but I would try to make the incoming traffic more equitable between the two Internet service providers.

    So my question is. Is there a way to determine how much makes precede I would add to the roadmap before implementing this change or simply add a prefix and note the change and then add traffic structure adds as a result?

    Thanks in advance for any help.

    K.

    I don't think that there is a good way to determine how many prefaces for use before making any changes. You should add one, check on the distribution of traffic to see the effect and then add another until you get the approximate balance you want.

    HTH

    Rick

  • MP - BGP import map Mulfunction

    Hi guys

    Another day, another weird happening. Here it goes:

    Background:

    In our network, we have separated the different types of traffic using the VRF. We have so many VRF which increased throughout the network. The point of connection between the VRF is MP - BGP. In other words, we have independent MP - BGP (MP - BGP without any nearby statement) configured on select routers that would be subject to the import and export of the routes in the different VRF. There are 'card import' and 'export card"configured under configurations VRF to restrict the prefixes we want to transfer between the VRF.

    Problem:

    Today, I wanted to update a list of prefixes for a card to import on the entire network. I needed this change on both routers. When I added the new permit prefixes in the list of prefixes for the import map, one of the routers reflects changes correctly by redistributing the roads while the other does not. Not the answering router is a Cisco 6509 with IOS image 12.2 (33) SXH3 IP services. The router works is a service of Advanced IP Cisco 7609 with IOS 12.2 image (33) SRC1. To simplify configuration, you can view the process as below:

    Map source VRF---> MP - BGP---> import---> Destination VRF

    Troubleshooting done so far:

    I spent a good part of my day looking at this matter. I checked that:

    1. two routers have the new prefixes in the source VRF
    2. There is no limitation in MP - BGP for the source VRF export
    3. I see that the prefixes in the source VRF BGP table
    4. There is no fault striking in terms of wrong type the name of the prefix-list route-map or import plan since we have another pair of these routers and the same situation going on there. The 6509 do not redistribute while not in the 7609.
    5. Only the router 7609 would eventually import the new prefixes in the destination VRF according to the changes made in terms of the import.

    Weird or what?

    Here's what I think the problem is: the card-import on the 6509 will not refresh automatically. Here's how I came to this conclusion:

    1. Early on I did a 'ip-prefix clear list' on both routers to set the numbers of statements access 0
    2. I added the new prefixes in the list of prefixes on both routers
    3. I did a 'Show the details of the ip prefix-list' command on the two routers
    4. I found that the hit counts for all the States in the list of prefixes of the 7609 were recalculated (including the number of newly added States access)
    5. This shows that when you add or remove a declaration of the prefix list, the 7609 courtesy of the updating of the import map
    6. Shockingly the stroke counts on the statements in the list of prefixes on the 6509 had all set to 0 (resulting from the ciommand 'clear' issued earlier)
    7. This shows that the import-map has not been updated
    8. This problem manifested itself in other ways as well although I won't get in but they are all indicating that the import-map isn't updating when statements are added or removed from the partner-listI prefix

    Now I know that many of you might suggest to remove the import map and add it again however, the production and make that change is not going to happen soon, so I would be grateful if any of you guys has other thoughts on this. This could very well be a bug that we continue to discuss with Cisco.

    Thank you

    Hello Babak,

    first of all, I want to thank you for the clear and complete description of your problem.

    Your results might suggest that an alternative implementation of BGP MP regarding BGP MP feature import map is in two IOS 12.2 SXH different trains (33) and 12.2 (33) SRC.

    This could be the case.

    I tried to look at the toolkit bug for 12.2 (33) SXH3 with the search key "import map" and there are some bugs listed, but none is an exact match of your scenario.

    This one

    CSCts25780

    card IP vrf import problem
    Symptom:
    change 'ip cpmmunity-list' does not inform the route-map and directions are therefore not
    re-evaluated whenever the road map is used. Conditionsof :
    route map should be "community game" configuredWorkaround:
    change the path map directly

    Is related to the refresh missing roads when a Community list of ip is changed (called in the road used in the import map map).

    It is therefore closer what I see.

    I'd say it's almost the same question an object used for correspondence in the road map has been changed and the road map is not reassessed.

    In your case is that a prefix ip-list in the description of the bug is a Community list.

    Best regards

    Giuseppe

  • Based on the IOS VPN Lan-to-Lan (NAT and route map Questions)

    Hello world

    I worked on my review of CCNA security and I have a question about this stage

    LAN1 192.168.0.0/24---(routeur HQ)--10.10.10.0/30--(INTERNET)--20.20.20.0/30--(routeur Branch) - LAN2 192.168.1.0/24

    I use 10.10.10.0/30 and 20.20.20.0/30 networks assuming that these are public addresses (is just a laboratory).

    I read that if I want to make the VPN tunnel while I using NAT I must exclude valuable traffic from the NAT process so I look on the database of cisco for more help and I found this (look at the 3660 router configuration):

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008045a2d2.shtml#T1

    so, I applied this config for my routers, so the config is:

    IP nat inside source map route sheep interface fastEthernet0/1

    access list 110 deny ip 192.168.0.0. 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    access list 119 permit ip 192.168.0.0. 0.0.0.255 any

    sheep allowed 10 route map

    corresponds to the IP 110

    I didn't really understand who is using the command route-map here, so I made this configuration:

    IP nat inside list sheep interface FastEthernet0/1

    sheep extended IP access list

    deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    Licensing ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

    Two of them worked I could translate my LAN addresses to the public to address internet and also could establish the VPN tunnel. So my questions are:

    1. What is the purpose of the road-map command?

    2. What is the difference between these two configuration?

    3. which one I should use and in what cases?

    Thanks in advance

    Jose

    Jose,

    Very good questions and in fact no need to the road map it.

    Personally, I like using course maps because it allows much more flexibility than simply ACL setup, but in order to bypass the NAT source IPs, there is no need of route-maps and you can do this with the ACL directly.

    I personally always use road-maps just because I can (route-maps are cool) haha

    Route-maps are very useful in other scenarios where you need to put more of conditions or factors.

    Remember that it is almost always more than one method to accomplish a task... which is one of those cases.

    It will be useful.

    Federico.

  • map of Cisco network topology first Infrastructure

    Hi just want to ask if it is possible to create a map of the network topology of edge of the main cisco which shows the cable devices and wireless infrastructure, or do we need another cisco product to accomplish.

    Thank you

    Hello

    Topology service is not supported in 2.0 IP, however, it is in the road map.

    for the support and the function of the comparison, you can check out the link below:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/netmgtsw/ps6504/ps6528/ps12239/guide_c07-729089.html

    Thank you-

    Alya

    [Note the useful post]

  • route-map command

    Hello

    I try to configure the router to router ipsec tunnel, but I don't understant what of the command:

    "road-map sheep permit 10.

    Can someone explain it to me clearly?

    Regars

    It is there so that if you perform tunneling split that IE don't no nat on to the list of internet access that you set. You must follow this command with a "match ip address".

  • Newbie question route-map/access-list

    I am quite new to the thing whole cisco here.  I'm very hesitant to make changes as I am not sure that I take down the entire network of 200%. (We are a very small company)

    We have a router cisco 1811 (yes I know its old)

    We now have a road map and I'm trying to understand it to make it work the way we want.  Basically, we have a few servers and we do not want some servers to use our cable internet connection, we want to use our T1.  Our T1 uses an ASA5505 as a router.  I don't know why, I know its not the best practice but I was just hired and that's all I have to say on this subject.  I am doing as a result.  Web traffic currently out our interface cable, everything, including the speed of transfer on speedtest.net out our T1.  This makes the bad, bad VoIP phone calls. We also have a tunnel punch in Q1 of our other offices as well as our server Exchange2010 using T1.   If our cable goes down, everything for the T1 (by design).  We have a long list of defined access our route map - use corresponding ip.  I want to change the access list to not allow local network IP addresses.  I know that if I put in a whole ip allow it break our network and nothing comes out of the T1 line, and no one can get to our mail server more.  So, I was thinking of adding some statements, but I was wondering if someone could help me with logic, so I know not if I will break the network.  I wouldn't pull the laminated cord and use the console.  (I really need get a USB serial interface).  Now, you understand a little more about my situation now for all numbers, etc.

    Network internal 90.0.0.0/24, 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.30.0/24, 172.20.0.0/16 (we use only 40 addresses, why they chose 16 is beyond me, stupid really)

    PTP VPN: 192.168.116.0/24 comes and goes out our T1.

    1811 router: 90.0.0.254/192.168.30.254/192.168.0.254

    ASA: 90.0.0.50

    !

    follow the accessibility of ALS 40 ip 40

    delay the decline 90 60

    !

    interface Vlan1

    Description * INTERFACE LAN 90.0.0.x network * $FW_INSIDE$

    IP 90.0.0.254 255.255.255.0

    IP nat inside

    IP virtual-reassembly

    IP tcp adjust-mss 1452

    route WEBPBR card intellectual property policy

    !

    interface Vlan10

    Description * INTERFACE LAN NET 192.168.0.x * $FW_INSIDE$

    IP 192.168.0.254 255.255.255.0

    IP nat inside

    IP helper 90.0.0.2

    IP virtual-reassembly

    route WEBPBR card intellectual property policy

    !

    ! Static routes

    IP forward-Protocol ND

    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 90.0.0.50 track 20

    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 197.164.245.109 200

    IP route 8.8.8.8 255.255.255.255 197.164.245.109 permanent

    IP route 10.250.10.0 255.255.255.0 90.0.0.50 permanent

    IP route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 90.0.0.50 permanent

    IP route 208.67.220.220 255.255.255.255 197.164.245.109 permanent

    WEBTRAFFIC extended IP access list
    deny ip any host 208.67.222.222
    deny ip any 172.20.0.0 0.0.255.255
    refuse the host tcp 90.0.0.2 any eq www
    refuse 90.0.0.14 tcp host any eq www
    refuse 90.0.0.235 tcp host any eq www
    refuse the host ip 192.168.0.40 everything
    deny ip any host 192.168.0.40
    refuse the host ip 192.168.0.41 all
    deny ip any host 192.168.0.41
    deny ip any host 192.168.0.221
    refuse the host ip 192.168.0.221 all
    refuse the host ip 192.168.0.225 all
    refuse 90.0.0.10 tcp host any eq www
    deny ip any host 192.168.0.225
    refuse 90.0.0.11 tcp host any eq www
    refuse 90.0.0.9 tcp host any eq www
    refuse 90.0.0.8 tcp host any eq www
    refuse 90.0.0.7 tcp host any eq www
    refuse 90.0.0.6 tcp host any eq www
    refuse the 90.0.0.1 tcp host any eq www
    refuse 90.0.0.13 tcp host any eq www
    refuse 90.0.0.200 tcp host any eq www
    permit tcp any any eq www
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.131 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.130 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.132 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.133 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.134 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.135 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.136 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.137 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.138 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.139 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.140 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.141 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.142 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.143 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.144 a
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.145 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.146 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.147 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.148 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.149 one
    allow the host ip 192.168.0.150 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.80 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.81 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.82 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.83 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.84 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.85 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.86 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.87 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.88 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.89 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.90 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.91 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.92 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.93 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.94 one
    allow the host ip 90.0.0.95 one
    refuse the host tcp 90.0.0.3 any eq www

    ALS IP 40

    208.67.220.220 ICMP echo source interface Vlan1

    Timeout 6000

    frequency 20

    ALS annex IP 40 life never start-time now

    allowed WEBPBR 2 route map

    corresponds to the IP WEBTRAFFIC

    set ip next-hop to check the availability of the 197.164.245.109 1 track 40

    That is how we have it set up right now.  If I put in a few lines above WEBTRAFFIC with:

    deny ip any 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip any 90.0.0.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip any 192.168.116.0 0.0.0.255

    !  Etc with all internal networks

    * And then put at the bottom:

    allow an ip

    who will ALL break so we can not communicate with anything?  Or is that what I did to do this, we get internal routing etc.?  Also, I guess I'd put in 15 IP addresses that are coming in the SAA as well?  (We have public IPS 14 (one for the T1 gateway) that would go as well?)  I don't want to try to put in those at the top and make sure no one can do anything.  I hope I made clear what I'm doing...

    Post edited by: Ryan Young

    I have not read this thread well enough to be able to talk to the intricacies of the issue whether this access will make what you want. But I can answer the specific question you are asking. Yes - the access list is top-down, transformed and if a few more top line in the access list matches, then treatment for this package will not get the license at the bottom of the access list.

    HTH

    Rick

  • Order BGP prefix-lists and maps-

    General question about BGP.

    Taking this config:

    1.1.1.1 neighbor prefix-list MY_PREFIX_LIST in
    1.1.1.1 neighbor MY_ROUTE_MAP route map in

    MY_ROUTE_MAP allowed 10 route map
    the local 110 AC value

    IP-list of prefixes MY_PREFIX_LIST seq 5 deny 2.2.2.2/32
    IP-list of prefixes MY_PREFIX_LIST seq 10 allowed the 0.0.0.0/0 32

    If 1.1.1.1 announcement the 2.2.2.2 prefix, it will rise (and local pref set to 110) because incoming cards are processed first (and of course the absence of a statement of correspondence indicates correspondence). Fix?

    Or have I misunderstood this page?

    Hi Steven,

    The BGP FAQ document you are referencing should be guide and authoritative. So for incoming routes, first the road map, then the list of prefixes are evaluated - that's right. But I think I understand different: the roadmap is the first filter, and all that's left after crossing the road map is also subject to the list of prefixes. A route is accepted only if it is authorized by the road map and the list of prefixes - it has to go together.

    So this logic, the 2.2.2.2/32 should not be accepted because although he did through the road map, the list of prefixes it explicitly.

    Which matches your observations?

    Best regards
    Peter

  • Google maps changed his mind

    is there a reason a google map which was fixed to the road map view has now converted to the vision of the world?  It is not

    Zoom in on the location more on a website and we have not changed the file.  Thank you!

    Hello

    I see the question, if I use # 220 in the address, if you delete # it shows the correct view. Could you please change this in your address and publish the site again, and this should solve the problem.

    With #.

    without #.

    Let me know if you have any question.

Maybe you are looking for

  • on old.windows

    HP Pavilion a6655f desktop PC This pc was orginaly vista and I upgraded to W7 and it did left a former windows file that had vista on it and he baptized old.windows IM in the treatment of deletion of unnecessary files free space on my pc, but I like

  • No luck trying to extract the .inf files from the drivers downloaded as zip files

    Hello I try to extract the .inf files from the drivers downloaded as files zip on the Toshiba site, but I'm having no luck. I'm trying to deploy images by using WDS on Server 2008 and need inf files if it is to succeed, there the answer to this probl

  • Installng Server2008r2 on a T330

    I have a new T330 with RAID 1 + 10. PERC H330 embedded controller.  2 each 500 GB on RAID 1 to 4 each 500 GB on RAID 10. I try to install Server 2008r2.  The question without keyboard or mouse has been resolved by installing a Star-Tech PCIe USB 2.0

  • Use the software to find the least crowded wireless channel, help

    Hello. I would like to know if it is a simple software available that I could use to check channels 1-11 wireless congestion. There are many too many routers around my own wireless access point, with an unknown amount of traffic on each, on unknown c

  • DC of Acrobat installed but printer PDF missing in Outlook 2010.

    I just installed Acrobat Pro DC, System WIn10. The PDF printer did not appear in my Outlook 2010. I tried to repair the installation of Acrobat - not helped. How to manually install the Acrobat PDF printer? Thank you